DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE BY NON-DESTRUCTIVE TEST METHOD USING

REBOUND HAMMER
AS PER IS 13311(P-2)
TABLE NO - 01
Client: National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report and pre-construction activities in respect of “Widening of existing carriageway into
2-lane with paved shoulder configuration and Several slope protection works, treatment of vulnerable sliding/sinking zones, Improvement of safety
Project Name:
and sustainability of NH network by incorporating Bypasses, Viaducts, Bridges, Tunnels, etc along NH-10 from Km 52.00 (Rangpo) to Km 80.00
(Ranipool) in the State of Sikkim.
Location Majitar D.O.C: NA
Type of Structure MNB Tested By: JK Rout
Date of testing: 29.04.2023

Avg Adjustin Standard Coefficient of Compressive

Impact Conditio
Sl No Part of Structure REBOUND VALUES Rebound g value value (R0 Conc. age Strength (F) Remark
Angle (θ) n
Value. (R) (δR) = R + δR ) (αn) N/mm2

1 Abutment-1(LHS) 39 36 36 40 41 37 38 0 0 38 0.66 Dry 35.9

2 Abutment-1(LHS) 40 37 42 42 40 37 40 0 0 40 0.66 Dry 39.1

3 Abutment-2(LHS) 36 28 40 38 41 28 35 0 0 35 0.66 Dry 31.5

4 Abutment-2(LHS) 37 34 41 38 35 36 37 0 0 37 0.66 Dry 33.9

5 Return wall 51 46 42 40 41 47 45 0 0 45 0.66 Dry 48.3

6 Deck Slab 40 37 40 40 38 37 39 -90 0 39 0.66 Dry 37.4

Notes: 1. Average Rebound value is taken by considering the values coming within the range of mean ± 6
2. The test is being conducted randomly selected spot on the slab and abutment of MNB
3.The estimation of strength of concrete by rebound hammer method cannot be held to be very accurate and probable accuracy of prediction of concrete strength
in a structure is + 25%.

LAB MANAGER
For Arki Techno Consultants (India) Pvt Ltd
 DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE BY NON-DESTRUCTIVE TEST METHOD USING
REBOUND HAMMER
AS PER IS 13311(P-2)
TABLE NO - 01
Client: National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report and pre-construction activities in respect of “Widening of existing carriageway into
2-lane with paved shoulder configuration and Several slope protection works, treatment of vulnerable sliding/sinking zones, Improvement of safety
Project Name:
and sustainability of NH network by incorporating Bypasses, Viaducts, Bridges, Tunnels, etc along NH-10 from Km 52.00 (Rangpo) to Km 80.00
(Ranipool) in the State of Sikkim.
Location CH-61+097(Bardang Nallah) D.O.C: NA
Type of Structure MNB Tested By: JK Rout
Date of testing: 30.04.2023

Avg Adjustin Standard Coefficient of Compressive

Impact Conditio
Sl No Part of Structure REBOUND VALUES Rebound g value value Conc. age Strength (F) Remark
Angle (θ) n
Value. (R) (δR) (R0 = R + δR ) (αn) N/mm2

1 Abutment-2 22 21 18 16 32 29 23 0 0 23 0.66 Dry 13.0

2 Abutment-2 28 31 26 24 30 22 27 0 0 27 0.66 Dry 18.2

3 Slab 38 42 42 39 41 30 39 -90 0 39 0.66 Dry 37.4

4 Slab 29 30 30 40 38 32 33 -90 0 33 0.66 Dry 27.8

5 Abutment-1 30 26 35 32 32 20 29 0 0 29 0.66 Dry 21.0

6 Top Slab 40 40 41 41 30 40 39 90 0 39 0.66 Dry 37.4

Notes1. Average Rebound value is taken by considering the values coming within the range of mean ± 6
2. The test is being conducted randomly selected spot on the slab and abutment of MNB
3.The estimation of strength of concrete by rebound hammer method cannot be held to be very accurate and probable accuracy of prediction of concrete strength in a
structure is + 25%.

LAB MANAGER
For Arki Techno Consultants (India) Pvt Ltd
 DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE BY NON-DESTRUCTIVE TEST METHOD USING
REBOUND HAMMER
AS PER IS 13311(P-2)
TABLE NO - 01
Client: National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report and pre-construction activities in respect of “Widening of existing carriageway into
2-lane with paved shoulder configuration and Several slope protection works, treatment of vulnerable sliding/sinking zones, Improvement of safety
Project Name:
and sustainability of NH network by incorporating Bypasses, Viaducts, Bridges, Tunnels, etc along NH-10 from Km 52.00 (Rangpo) to Km 80.00
(Ranipool) in the State of Sikkim.
Location CH-74+575 D.O.C: NA
Type of Structure MNB Tested By: JK Rout
Date of testing: 30.04.2023
Standard
Avg Adjustin Coefficient of Compressive
Impact value Conditio
Sl No Part of Structure REBOUND VALUES Rebound g value Conc. age Strength (F) Remark
Angle (θ) (R0 = R + δR n
Value. (R) (δR) (αn) N/mm2
)

1 Garder 40 39 35 38 35 36 37 -90 0 37 0.66 Dry 33.9

2 Abutment-2 34 36 40 38 40 39 38 0 0 38 0.66 Dry 35.9

3 Abutment-A wall 32 32 34 30 30 32 32 0 0 32 0.66 Dry 25.8

4 Retaining wall 35 32 32 31 31 32 32 0 0 32 0.66 Dry 25.8

5 Bridge top slab 35 30 30 39 38 28 33 90 0 33 0.66 Dry 27.6

6 Parapet wall 31 30 30 31 30 30 30 0 0 30 0.66 Dry 22.5

Notes1. Average Rebound value is taken by considering the values coming within the range of mean ± 6
2. The test is being conducted randomly selected spot on the slab and abutment of MNB
3.The estimation of strength of concrete by rebound hammer method cannot be held to be very accurate and probable accuracy of prediction of concrete strength in a
structure is + 25%.

LAB MANAGER
For Arki Techno Consultants (India) Pvt Ltd
 DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE BY NON-DESTRUCTIVE TEST METHOD USING
REBOUND HAMMER
AS PER IS 13311(P-2)
TABLE NO - 01
Client: National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report and pre-construction activities in respect of “Widening of existing carriageway into
2-lane with paved shoulder configuration and Several slope protection works, treatment of vulnerable sliding/sinking zones, Improvement of safety
Project Name:
and sustainability of NH network by incorporating Bypasses, Viaducts, Bridges, Tunnels, etc along NH-10 from Km 52.00 (Rangpo) to Km 80.00
(Ranipool) in the State of Sikkim.
Location CH-63+589 D.O.C: NA
Type of Structure MJB Tested By: JK Rout
Date of testing: 01.05.2023

Avg Adjustin Standard Coefficient of Compressive

Impact Conditio
Sl No Part of Structure REBOUND VALUES Rebound g value value Conc. age Strength (F) Remark
Angle (θ) n
Value. (R) (δR) (R0 = R + δR ) (αn) N/mm2

1 39 36 40 45 45 41 41 0 0 41 0.66 Dry 41.1

Abutment-1
2 40 41 42 40 40 45 41 0 0 41 0.66 Dry 41.1

3 41 40 39 38 38 42 40 0 0 40 0.66 Dry 39.1

Abutment-2
4 41 36 38 30 40 36 37 0 0 37 0.66 Dry 33.9

Notes1. Average Rebound value is taken by considering the values coming within the range of mean ± 6
2. The test is being conducted randomly selected spot on the slab and abutment of MNB
3.The estimation of strength of concrete by rebound hammer method cannot be held to be very accurate and probable accuracy of prediction of concrete strength in a
structure is + 25%.

LAB MANAGER
For Arki Techno Consultants (India) Pvt Ltd