You are on page 1of 20

FOI 240-1718

T
FR HIS
BY E D
E O
TH DO C
E M UM
D O E
EP F N
AR IN T IS
TM FO R

1
EN RM ELE
T AT AS
O IO E
F N D
H A U
EA C N
LT T 1 DE
H 98 R
2 TH
E
Genome Engineering

David Tscharke, John Curtin School of Medical Research, ANU


Document 1
A Brief History of Genetic Modification

• The first GMO was made in 1973


› Bacteria carrying DNA of another species

E
2 TH
• Most manipulation of DNA has been done using short

H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
fragments in test tubes and bacterial systems

EA C N
H A U
F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
• This DNA can be transferred to human / animal cells to

EN RM ELE
TM FO R
add something new to their genome

AR IN T IS
EP F N
› Naked DNA or packaged into a virus ‘vector’ for delivery
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C

› Insertion is random → unexpected consequences


E O
BY E D
FR HIS

› Could be inserted into fertilized ovum to make an animal


T

• First targeted transgenic animal (mouse) made in 1987


› Genes could be removed or changed in an animal

FOI 240-1718 2 Document 1


A brief history of genetic modification II

• Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and chemical


synthesis of DNA made things faster

E
2 TH
• Methods like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and

H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
chemical synthesis of DNA → synthetic biology

H A U
F N D
O IO E
› Still a long way off making mammals

T AT AS
EN RM ELE
TM FO R
• RNAi allowed genes to be turned down

AR IN T IS
EP F N
› Has to be a constantly present
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D

• Achieving a desired genetic change - even in cells in


FR HIS
T

tissue culture remained practically impossible


› This is the first step towards therapeutic genome modification

FOI 240-1718 3 Document 1


FOI 240-1718
T
FR HIS
BY E D
E O
TH DO C
E M UM
D O E
EP F N
AR IN T IS
TM FO R

4
EN RM ELE
T AT AS
O IO E
F N D
H A U
EA C N
LT T 1 DE
H 98 R
2 TH
E
Gene therapy – could only add new DNA

Kaufmann KB et al, EMBO Mol Med,


Document 1
2014
Key limitations
• Most cutting and modification done in vitro not in cells
› Have to get DNA out of cells and back in again
› Limits the length that can be easily modified

E
2 TH
• The enzymes used to cut had defined recognition sites

H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
› E.g. GAATTC

H A U
F N D
O IO E
› They rarely cut exactly where you want

T AT AS
EN RM ELE
› They cut at many other places

TM FO R
AR IN T IS
• PCR and synthetic DNA methods were helping
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
› But did not overcome these basic problems
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS

• We all wanted a DNA cutting enzyme (a nuclease) that:


T

› Cuts at a sequence of our choosing


› Would work inside living cells

FOI 240-1718 5 Document 1


Enter targetted nucleases
Zinc finger nucleases and TALENs
• A new protein required for each site to be cut
• Proprietary technology

E
2 TH
H 98 R
• Expensive

LT T 1 DE
EA C N
H A U
• Efficiency limited

F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
EN RM ELE
TM FO R
AR IN T IS
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS
T

FOI 240-1718 6
Walker-Daniels J, Mater. Methods, 2013
Document 1
CRISPR/Cas9 (and variants)
Lives up to the hype!
• Open source (for research)
• Cheap

E
2 TH
• Highly efficient

H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
H A U
gRNA Cas9

F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
EN RM ELE
TM FO R
AR IN T IS
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D

Clustered
FR HIS

Regularly
T

Interspaced
Short
Palidromic
Repeats

FOI 240-1718 7
Pennisi E, Science, 2013
Document 1
Two ways to edit DNA with CRISPR/Cas9

gRNA/Cas9
Genome to be edited

E
2 TH
H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
H A U
F N D
O IO E
Homology-directed

T AT AS
EN RM ELE
repair (HDR)

TM FO R
AR IN T IS
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS

Non-homologous
T

HDR
end joining (NHEJ)

FOI 240-1718
http://www.aati-us.com/images/crispr-dual-editing-method.png
8 Document 1
Why is it so easy?
• There are genetic constructs that make Cas9 and have
a site to add DNA for any gRNA you like
› https://www.addgene.org/CRISPR/

E
2 TH
• If this is put into cells, it just goes to work…

H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
H A U
F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
EN RM ELE
TM FO R
Cas9

AR IN T IS
EP F N
gRNA
D O E
pCRISPR E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS
T

FOI 240-1718 9 Pennisi E, Science, 2013


Document 1
So very easy
• You can buy Cas9 protein and any gRNA you like
• Mix them in a tube
• ‘Transfect’ them into a cell

E
2 TH
H 98 R
› with or without a repair DNA

LT T 1 DE
EA C N
• If there is no DNA, is it a GMO?

H A U
F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
EN RM ELE
TM FO R
AR IN T IS
$200
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS

$600
T

FOI 240-1718 10
Pennisi E, Science, 2013
Document 1
The catch: Specificity and ‘off-target effects’

• Off-target effects are considered the main limitation


› Cutting at undesired locations

E
› Partly addressed by combining two Cas9 ‘nickases’

2 TH
H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
H A U
F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
EN RM ELE
TM FO R
AR IN T IS
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
5’ 3’
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS
T

3’ 5’

FOI 240-1718
http://www.genecopoeia.com/resource/crispr-cas9-specificity-taming-off-target-mutagenesis/
11 Document 1
Gene therapy can now include gene correction

E
2 TH
H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
H A U
F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
EN RM ELE
CRISPR/Cas9

TM FO R
AR IN T IS
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS
T

Repaired cells Diseased cells

Targetting the CRISPR/Cas9 is still a major hurdle for in vivo gene therapy

FOI 240-1718 12 Document 1


FOI 240-1718
T
FR HIS
BY E D
E O
TH DO C
E M UM
D O E
EP F N
AR IN T IS
TM FO R

13
EN RM ELE
T AT AS
O IO E
F N D
H A U
EA C N
LT T 1 DE
H 98 R
2 TH
E
‘CRISPR’ clinical trials on the US NIH database

Document 1
FOI 240-1718
T
FR HIS
BY E D
E O
TH DO C
E M UM
D O E
EP F N
AR IN T IS
TM FO R

14
EN RM ELE
T AT AS
O IO E
F N D
H A U
EA C N
LT T 1 DE
Gene drives

H 98 R
2 TH
E

Document 1
Gene drives

• Genes that are inherited at greater than Medelian rates

E
2 TH
H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
H A U
F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
EN RM ELE
TM FO R
AR IN T IS
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS
T

SYNTHETIC GENE DRIVES IN AUSTRALIA:


IMPLICATIONS OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCE MAY 2017

FOI 240-1718 15 Document 1


Normal (Mendelian) inheritance
• There are two copies of the genome
• One copy of each gene comes from each parent

E
2 TH
H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
H A U
F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
EN RM ELE
TM FO R
AR IN T IS
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D
FR HIS
T

The gene will be in ¼ of next generation (assuming most are grey)

FOI 240-1718 16 Document 1


FOI 240-1718
T
FR HIS
BY E D
E O
TH DO C
E M UM
D O E
EP F N
AR IN T IS
TM FO R

17
EN RM ELE
T AT AS
O IO E
F N D
H A U
EA C N
LT T 1 DE
Gene drives

H 98 R
2 TH
E
• A gene drive can cause a gene to be duplicated

Document 1
FOI 240-1718
T
FR HIS
BY E D
E O
TH DO C
E M UM
D O E
EP F N
AR IN T IS
TM FO R

18
EN RM ELE
T AT AS
O IO E
F N D
H A U
EA C N
LT T 1 DE
H 98 R
2 TH
E
What does CRISPR have to do with gene drives?

Document 1
Applications of gene drives
• Inhibiting / controlling insect vectors of disease
› Health benefits, especially for developing nations
• Pest animal control

E
2 TH
› Potential environmental benefit

H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
EA C N
• Controlling pests of agriculture

H A U
F N D
O IO E
T AT AS
› Commercial benefit

EN RM ELE
› Improved food security

TM FO R
AR IN T IS
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
TH DO C
E O
BY E D

• Any release requires enourmous care and


FR HIS

consideration
T

• Public scrutiny required


› Very substantial dread

FOI 240-1718 19 Document 1


Strategic issues

• How does Australia ensure we are active participants


and not bystanders?

E
2 TH
• How will we decide when genome engineering is

H 98 R
LT T 1 DE
considered safe for human medicine?

EA C N
H A U
F N D
O IO E
› What will be the quality benchmarks for certification?

T AT AS
EN RM ELE
• How will we balance potential health benefits against

TM FO R
AR IN T IS
environmental concern (e.g. gene drives)?
EP F N
D O E
E M UM
• How will we ensure that policy and the public are
TH DO C
E O
BY E D

informed by science?
FR HIS
T

• How will we respond to international regulatory moves


(e.g. licencing or moratoria)

FOI 240-1718 20 Document 1

You might also like