9/17/23, 11:19 PM PATENT eFiling

Welcome Harish Sharma Sign out

Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade

Marks
G.A.R.6
[See Rule 22(1)]
RECEIPT
Docket No 96693 Date/Time 2023/09/17 23:18:24

To UserId: inpa3649
Harish Sharma

A-2, Sect.-60, Noida,Uttar Pradesh

CBR Detail:

Sr. Ref. No./Application Amount C.B.R. Form

App. Number Remarks
No. No. Paid No. Name

Multiple Camera based System for 3D Model

TEMP/E-
1 202341062492 1600 42220 FORM 1 Construction of Inner Walls of Ship Propeller from 2D
1/72121/2023-CHE
Imag
E-
2 202341062492 2500 42220 FORM 9 ----
12/8700/2023/CHE

TransactionID Payment Mode Challan Identification Number Amount Paid Head of A/C No

N-0001219065 Online Bank Transfer 1709230008300 4100.00 1475001020000001

Total Amount : 4100.00

Amount in Words: Rupees Four Thousand One Hundred Only
Received from Harish Sharma the sum of 4100.00 on account of Payment of fee for above mentioned Application/Forms.
* This is a computer generated receipt, hecnce no signature required.

Print

Home About Us Contact Us

https://ipronline.ipindia.gov.in/epatentfiling/CBRReceipt/printCBRReceipt 1/1
 FORM 1 (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
THE PATENTS ACT 1970 (39 of
1970) and THE PATENTS RULES,
2003 APPLICATION FOR GRANT
OF PATENT
(See section 7, 54 and 135 and sub-rule (1) of rule
20)
Application No.
Filing date:
Amount of Fee
paid:
CBR No:
Signature:
1. APPLICANT’S REFERENCE /
IDENTIFICATION NO. (AS
ALLOTTED BY OFFICE)
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION [Please tick ( ) at the appropriate category]
Ordinary () Convention ( ) PCT-NP ( )
Divisional Patent of Divisional Patent of Divisional Patent of Addition ( )
() Addition ( ) () Addition ( ) ( )
3A. APPLICANT(S)
Name in Full Nationality Country of Address of the Applicant
Residence
1. Dr. S. Sathees Kumar Associate Professor, Department of
Mechanical Engineering,
Indian India
Institute of Aeronautical Engineering,
Hyderabad, 500043
2. Dr. Ranu Gupta Assistant Professor, Department of
Electronics and Communication
Engineering (ECE), Jaypee
Indian India
University of Engineering and
Technology, AB Road, Raghogarh,
Guna, (MP), India, 473226
3. Mr. Ashutosh Pandey Assistant Professor, Department of
Indian India Civil Engineering, MATS University,
Raipur, India, 493441
4. Ram Ji Dixit Assistant Professor, Department of
Indian India MCA, ABES Institute of Technology,
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
5. S. Riyazbanu Assistant Professor, Department of
CSE, K.S.R.M. College of
Indian India
Engineering, Kadapa, Andhra
Pradesh, 516003
1
6. J. Immanuel Durai Raj Assistant Professor, Department of
Mechanical Engineering,
Indian India
St. Joseph's Institute of Technology,
OMR, Chennai, 600119
7. Dr. Mahesh R. Shukla Associate Professor & Head,
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Indian India MKSSS Cummins College of
Engineering for Women, Hingna,
Nagpur, 441110
8. Prof. Amruta Jagdish Assistant Professor, Department of
Killol Civil Engineering, Ajeenkya D.Y.Patil
Indian India
School of Engineering, Lohgaon,
Pune
9. Dr. Rakesh Kumar Associate Professor, Department of
Pandey Indian India Civil Engineering, MATS University
Raipur, India, 493441
3B. CATEGORY OF APPLICANT [Please tick ( ) at the appropriate category]
Natural Person ( ) Other than Natural Person
Small Entity ( ) Startup () Others ()
4. INVENTOR(S) [Please tick ( ) at the appropriate category]
Are all the inventor(s) Yes ( ) No ()
same as the applicant(s)
named above?
If “No”, furnish the details of the inventor(s)
Name in Full Nationality Country of Address of the Inventor
Residence
Same as Applicant

5. TITLE OF THE INVENTION

“Multiple Camera based System for 3D Model Construction of Inner Walls of Ship
Propeller from 2D Images”
6. AUTHORISED REGISTERED PATENT IN/PA No.
AGENT(S) Name
Mobile No.
7. ADDRESS FOR SERVICE OF Name Dr. S. Sathees Kumar
APPLICANT IN INDIA Postal Address Associate Professor,
Department of Mechanical
Engineering,
Institute of Aeronautical
Engineering, Hyderabad,
500043
Telephone No.
Mobile No. 9442547353
Fax No.
2
 E-mail ID mail2patentipr@gmail.com
8. IN CASE OF APPLICATION CLAIMING PRIORITY OF APPLICATION FILED IN
CONVENTION
COUNTRY, PARTICULARS OF CONVENTION APPLICATION
Country Application Filing date Name of the Title of the IPC (as classified in the
Number applicant invention convention country)

9. IN CASE OF PCT NATIONAL PHASE APPLICATION, PARTICULARS OF

INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION FILED UNDER PATENT CO-OPERATION TREATY
(PCT)
International application number International filing date

10. IN CASE OF DIVISIONAL APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 16,

PARTICULARS OF
ORIGINAL (FIRST) APPLICATION
Original (first) application No. Date of filing of original (first) application

11. IN CASE OF PATENT OF ADDITION FILED UNDER SECTION 54, PARTICULARS

OF MAIN
APPLICATION OR PATENT
Main application/patent No. Date of filing of main application
12. DECLARATIONS
(i) Declaration by the inventor(s)
(In case the applicant is an assignee: the inventor(s) may sign herein below or the
applicant may upload the assignment or enclose the assignment with this
application for patent or send the assignment by post/electronic transmission duly
authenticated within the prescribed period).
I/We, the above named inventor(s) is/are the true & first inventor(s) for this Invention
and declare that the applicant(s) herein is/are my/our assignee or legal
representative.
(a) Date 15/09/2023
(b) Name (c) Signature
1. Dr. S. Sathees Kumar
2. Dr. Ranu Gupta
3. Mr. Ashutosh Pandey
4. Ram Ji Dixit
5. S. Riyazbanu
6. J. Immanuel Durai Raj
7. Dr. Mahesh R. Shukla
8. Prof. Amruta Jagdish Killol
9. Dr. Rakesh Kumar Pandey

3
 (ii) Declaration by the applicant(s) in the convention country
(In case the applicant in India is different than the applicant in the convention
country: the applicant in the convention country may sign herein below or applicant
in India may upload the assignment from the applicant in the convention country or
enclose the said assignment with this application for patent or send the assignment
by post/electronic transmission duly authenticated within the prescribed period)

I/We, the applicant(s) in the convention country declare that the applicant(s) herein
is/are my/our assignee or legal representative.
(a) Date
(b) Signature(s)
(c) Name(s) of the signatory
(iii) Declaration by the applicant(s)
I/We the applicant(s) hereby declare(s) that: -
 I am/ We are in possession of the above-mentioned invention.
 The provisional/complete specification relating to the invention is filed with this
application.
 The invention as disclosed in the specification uses the biological material
from India and the necessary permission from the competent authority shall be
submitted by me/us before the grant of patent to me/us.
 There is no lawful ground of objection(s) to the grant of the Patent to me/us.
 I am/we are the true & first inventor(s).
 I am/we are the assignee or legal representative of true & first inventor(s).
 The application or each of the applications, particulars of which are given in
Paragraph-8, was the first application in convention country/countries in
respect of my/our invention(s).
 I/We claim the priority from the above mentioned application(s) filed in
convention country/countries and state that no application for protection in
respect of the invention had been made in a convention country before that
date by me/us or by any person from which I/We derive the title.
 My/our application in India is based on international application under Patent
Cooperation Treaty (PCT) as mentioned in Paragraph-9.
 The application is divided out of my /our application particulars of which is
given inParagraph-10 and pray that this application may be treated as deemed
to have been filed on DD/MM/YYYY under section 16 of the Act.
 The said invention is an improvement in or modification of the invention
particulars of which are given in Paragraph-11.
13. FOLLOWING ARE THE ATTACHMENTS WITH THE APPLICATION
(a) Form 2
Item Details Fee Remarks
4
Complete/ No. of pages: 16
Provisional
specification) #
No. of Claim(s) No. of claims: 10
No. of pages: 02
Abstract No. of pages: 01
No. of Drawing(s) No. of drawings: 01
No. of pages: 01

# In case of a complete specification, if the applicant desires to adopt the drawings filed
with his provisional specification as the drawings or part of the drawings for the complete
specification under rule 13(4), the number of such pages filed with the provisional
specification are
required to be mentioned here.
(b) Complete specification (in conformation with the international application)/as
amended before the International Preliminary Examination Authority (IPEA), as
applicable (2 copies).
(c) Sequence listing in electronic form
(d) Drawings (in conformation with the international application)/as amended before the
International Preliminary Examination Authority (IPEA), as applicable (2 copies).
(e) Priority document(s) or a request to retrieve the priority document(s) from DAS (Digital
Access Service) if the applicant had already requested the office of first filing to
make the priority document(s) available to DAS.
(f) Translation of priority document/Specification/International Search
Report/International Preliminary Report on Patentability.
(g) Statement and Undertaking on Form 3
(h) Declaration of Inventorship on Form 5
(i)Power of Authority
(j)Total fee ₹……….in Cash/ Banker's Cheque /Bank Draft bearing No..........
Date on …………. Bank.
I/We hereby declare that to the best of my/our knowledge, information and belief
the fact and matters slated herein are correct and I/We request that a patent may
be granted to me/us for the said invention.
Dated this 15th day of September 2023

Signature:
Name: Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al.
To,
The Controller of Patents
The Patent Office, at Chennai

5
Note: -
* Repeat boxes in case of more than one entry.
* To be signed by the applicant(s) or by authorized registered patent agent otherwise where
mentioned.
* Tick ()/cross (x) whichever is applicable/not applicable in declaration in paragraph-12.
* Name of the inventor and applicant should be given in full, family name in the beginning.
* Strike out the portion which is/are not applicable.
* For fee: See First Schedule”;

6
 FORM 2

THE PATENTS ACT 1970

(39 of 1970)

&

The Patent Rules 2003

COMPLETE SPECIFICATION

(See section 10 and rule 13)

TITLE OF THE INVENTION

“Multiple Camera based System for 3D Model Construction of Inner Walls

of Ship Propeller from 2D Images”

We, applicant(s)

NAME NATIONALITY ADDRESS

1. Dr. S. Sathees Kumar Associate Professor,

Department of Mechanical
Indian Engineering, Institute of
Aeronautical Engineering,
Hyderabad, 500043
2. Dr. Ranu Gupta Assistant Professor, Department
of Electronics and
Communication Engineering
Indian (ECE), Jaypee University of
Engineering and Technology,
AB Road, Raghogarh, Guna,
(MP), India, 473226
3. Mr. Ashutosh Pandey Assistant Professor, Department
Indian of Civil Engineering, MATS
University, Raipur, India, 493441
4. Ram Ji Dixit Assistant Professor, Department
of MCA, ABES Institute of
Indian
Technology, Ghaziabad, Uttar
Pradesh

1
 5. S. Riyazbanu Assistant Professor, Department
of CSE, K.S.R.M. College of
Indian
Engineering, Kadapa, Andhra
Pradesh, 516003
6. J. Immanuel Durai Raj Assistant Professor, Department
of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian St. Joseph's Institute of
Technology, OMR, Chennai,
600119
7. Dr. Mahesh R. Shukla Associate Professor & Head,
Mechanical Engineering
Department, MKSSS Cummins
Indian
College of Engineering for
Women, Hingna, Nagpur,
441110
8. Prof. Amruta Jagdish Assistant Professor, Department
Killol of Civil Engineering, Ajeenkya
Indian
D.Y.Patil School of Engineering,
Lohgaon, Pune
9. Dr. Rakesh Kumar Associate Professor,
Pandey Department of Civil Engineering,
Indian
MATS University Raipur, India,
493441

The following specification particularly describes the nature of the invention and the

manner in which it is performed:

2
 FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the domain of optical imaging and three-

dimensional (3D) reconstruction. More specifically, the invention pertains to a system

that utilizes multiple cameras for capturing two-dimensional (2D) images and

5 subsequently processes these images to construct an accurate 3D model of the inner

walls of ship propellers. This inventive approach offers a precise and efficient

methodology to evaluate and inspect the intricate structural details and potential

defects of ship propellers, thereby ensuring their optimal performance and safety.

Background of the invention:

10 In the ever-evolving realm of ship manufacturing and maintenance, the propeller

stands as one of the most crucial components, responsible for the propulsion of the

vessel. Traditionally, the inspection and assessment of ship propellers, particularly

their inner walls, have been challenging due to their complex geometries and the

critical need for precision. Ensuring the structural integrity and efficiency of these

15 propellers is of paramount importance, given that even minor defects or inaccuracies

can lead to significant performance issues or even catastrophic failures.

Historically, inspections were carried out manually by divers or using rudimentary

tools, which were not only time-consuming but also prone to human errors. With the

advent of technology, two-dimensional imaging was introduced, providing a clearer

3
 view of the propeller's surface. However, 2D images often lacked depth perception,

making it hard to gauge the actual state of defects or to understand the intricacies of

the propeller's structure. As a result, it became apparent that a more advanced,

reliable, and efficient method was needed to address these challenges.

5 With the burgeoning advancements in optical imaging and digital processing, there

arose an opportunity to capture detailed images of surfaces and transform them into

three-dimensional representations. 3D modeling techniques have seen extensive

applications in various industries, from architecture to healthcare. In the context of ship

propellers, creating a 3D model from 2D images would provide an unparalleled view

10 of the inner walls, revealing details that might remain unnoticed with conventional

inspection methods.

The idea of using multiple cameras for capturing images from different angles

introduced the possibility of covering a broader area of the propeller's surface in less

time, while also ensuring that no detail, no matter how minute, was overlooked. This

15 method would harness the collective data from all cameras, process it, and then

generate a composite 3D model. Such a comprehensive approach would not only

expedite the inspection process but would also increase its accuracy, ensuring the

durability and efficacy of ship propellers.

4
 However, the lack of a dedicated system that seamlessly integrates the capabilities of

multiple cameras and processes the gathered 2D images into a detailed 3D model of

ship propeller inner walls was a glaring gap in the industry. This backdrop set the stage

for the present invention, offering a solution tailored to address the unique challenges

5 associated with ship propeller inspection and modeling.

The maritime industry has long recognized the imperative of thorough propeller

assessments. As the propeller operates in a harsh maritime environment, it's exposed

to corrosive seawater, abrasive sediments, and occasionally, marine life, leading to

wear and tear over time. Any damage or deformation can impact the hydrodynamic

10 efficiency, potentially leading to increased fuel consumption, reduced speed, or

harmful vibrations. Moreover, undetected internal defects can propagate over time,

leading to failures that could sideline a ship and result in expensive repairs or even

replacements.

The importance of a propeller's structural integrity is not just about maintaining optimal

15 performance; it's also a matter of safety. A damaged propeller can cause imbalance

and instability, leading to potentially hazardous situations especially when the ship is

in full throttle in the open sea. The potential repercussions of a propeller malfunction

underline the significance of timely and accurate inspections.

5
 The technological advancements in optical imaging had been waiting in the wings,

poised to provide solutions to these longstanding challenges. The potential of

computer vision, coupled with the power of algorithms to stitch together and interpret

multiple images, emerged as a promising avenue. However, the specific requirements

5 for inspecting the inner walls of ship propellers—given their intricate structures and the

nuances of their curvatures—demanded a more specialized approach than generic

3D modeling tools.

Introducing the concept of multiple camera systems provided a potential answer to

these demands. By strategically positioning cameras around the propeller, it became

10 feasible to capture its entirety, from the hub to the tip of the blades. This not only

ensured comprehensive coverage but also reduced shadow areas or blind spots that

might be present when using a single camera. Additionally, by comparing and

contrasting images from various angles, it became possible to identify discrepancies

or anomalies more efficiently, thereby enhancing the reliability of the inspection

15 process.

Yet, the journey from capturing multiple 2D images to constructing a cohesive 3D

model is not straightforward. It requires sophisticated algorithms that can account for

distortions, ensure accurate alignment, and seamlessly merge images to produce a

model that accurately reflects the propeller's physical state. This process needs to

6
 account for variable lighting conditions, potential reflections from the metallic surface

of the propeller, and the inherent differences in perspective from each camera.

It was against this backdrop of challenges and possibilities that the present invention

was conceived. Its goal was to bridge the technological potential with the industry's

5 pressing needs, ushering in a new era of propeller inspection and maintenance.

Through this invention, maritime professionals now have access to a tool that not only

elevates the precision of inspections but also simplifies the entire process, ensuring

that ships can continue to sail the world's oceans with confidence and efficiency. Some

patent prior art related to proposed invention mentioned below.

10 Titled “3D Surface Imaging with Spatial Cameras,” this patent describes a system and

method to obtain three-dimensional images of an object. Though it doesn't focus on

ship propellers specifically, it emphasizes the use of multiple spatial cameras to cover

different angles and facets of an object, which can be applicable to propeller imaging.

This patent, “Multi-Camera System for 3D Imaging,” provides an arrangement of

15 cameras in a specific configuration to maximize the capture of 3D data from a subject.

The system adjusts camera parameters based on the subject’s depth, ensuring

consistent and detailed 3D models, which may be adapted for detailed imaging of ship

propellers.

7
 US Patent 8,094,788 B1: “System and Method for Creating 3D Models from 2D

Sequential Images” details a method to generate 3D models using sequential 2D

images captured from a single camera in motion. Although the system primarily

operates with a single camera, its methods could be incorporated with multiple

5 cameras for propeller imaging.

WO 2016/153456 A1: Titled “Underwater Multi-Camera Imaging and 3D

Reconstruction,” this patent focuses on capturing 3D data of underwater objects. The

described system compensates for light distortions and reflections typical in

underwater environments, making it especially relevant for ship propeller imaging.

10 US Patent 9,235,934 B2: “Adaptive Structured Light Patterns for 3D Imaging” presents

a system where structured light patterns are projected onto an object, and multiple

cameras capture the reflections. This can be useful in determining the intricate

geometries of ship propellers and their inner walls.

“Three-Dimensional Measurement Apparatus Using Multiple Cameras” outlines a

15 technique where multiple cameras capture images that are then processed in tandem

to produce a 3D model. The approach could be valuable when adapted for the specific

intricacies of ship propellers.

This patent, “System and Method for Ship Hull Inspection Using Multiple Cameras,”

focuses on the ship's hull, but its methods and camera configurations can be adapted

8
 for the ship propellers. The system details how cameras can be positioned and

synchronized for comprehensive coverage of maritime structures.

“Underwater 3D Imaging Using Convergent Cameras” describes a system where

cameras converge at a specific angle to capture underwater objects. The setup

5 ensures minimized distortions from water refractions and could be particularly

beneficial for capturing the inner walls of ship propellers underwater.

Summary of the proposed invention:

The proposed invention offers a cutting-edge system designed specifically for the

three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of ship propellers, with an emphasis on their

10 inner walls, from two-dimensional (2D) images. Central to this innovation is the

integration of multiple cameras, which work collaboratively to capture comprehensive

and overlapping images of the propeller from various angles.

The captured images are then processed using advanced algorithms to stitch them

together, translating the 2D data into an accurate and detailed 3D model. This model

15 serves as a precise representation of the propeller's inner walls, revealing even the

minutest details and potential defects.

By utilizing this system, maritime professionals can obtain a more holistic and in-depth

understanding of the propeller's condition, ensuring optimal performance and safety.

The invention stands as a testament to the fusion of optical imaging technology with
9
 advanced computational techniques, delivering a solution tailored to address the

challenges associated with ship propeller inspections.

Brief description of the proposed invention:

The proposed invention is a sophisticated technological system, meticulously

5 designed to address the challenges associated with the inspection of the inner walls

of ship propellers. Recognizing the inherent complexities of these propellers and the

difficulties posed by traditional inspection methods, this invention harnesses the power

of multiple cameras to capture a series of overlapping two-dimensional (2D) images

from diverse vantage points around the propeller.

10 Each camera is strategically positioned to ensure comprehensive coverage of the

propeller’s surface. The multiple angles from which these cameras capture images

address potential blind spots and areas that may be obscured in a single-camera

configuration. This extensive image capture is essential to ensure that no detail,

however minute, is overlooked or misinterpreted. Once the 2D images are captured,

15 they are channeled into the system's processing unit, where advanced algorithms take

over.

These algorithms are the backbone of the invention, transforming the captured images

into a cohesive and accurate three-dimensional (3D) model of the propeller's inner

walls. The process involves intricate steps of aligning, comparing, and merging

10
 images, ensuring that the depth, curvature, and minute details of the propeller are

accurately represented. Any potential distortions introduced by the angle of capture,

reflections from the metallic surface of the propeller, or variable lighting conditions are

meticulously corrected to ensure the model's accuracy.

5 Beyond the mere creation of a 3D model, the system is designed to identify

discrepancies, anomalies, or potential defects that might pose a threat to the

propeller's performance. This is achieved through a combination of pattern recognition

techniques and comparison metrics that evaluate the consistency and integrity of the

propeller's structure. The detailed 3D model serves not just as a visual representation,

10 but as a comprehensive analysis tool that maritime professionals can rely on for

maintenance, repairs, or even redesigns.

The ingenuity of the proposed invention is further accentuated when considering the

dynamic and often challenging environment in which ship propellers operate. Given

that they are submerged underwater for most of their operational life, traditional

15 inspection methods often involve dry-docking the ship or deploying divers to visually

inspect the propeller. Both methods are not only resource-intensive but also come with

their set of limitations in terms of the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the

inspection.

11
 By leveraging the power of multiple cameras, the system negates the need for these

cumbersome methods. Instead, it offers the possibility of in-situ inspections, where the

propeller can be analyzed without the need to remove it from its operational

environment. This not only reduces downtime and associated costs but also provides

5 a more realistic assessment of the propeller in conditions closely mirroring its typical

operational state.

Furthermore, the advanced algorithms employed by the system ensure that the data

from each camera is harmoniously integrated. This data integration is vital to create a

3D model that is not just visually accurate but also structurally and dimensionally

10 consistent. Such high levels of accuracy are paramount, especially when considering

that even minor defects or misalignments in a propeller can lead to inefficiencies,

increased fuel consumption, or at worst, mechanical failures.

The system's adaptability is another notable feature. While the primary focus is on the

inner walls of ship propellers, the principles and methodologies employed can

15 potentially be adapted for other maritime components or even entirely different

industries where detailed 3D reconstructions from 2D images are beneficial.

In addition, the resulting 3D models are not just static representations. They can be

integrated into simulation software to predict how the propeller would behave under

different conditions, facilitating proactive interventions if required. This predictive

12
 capability is a game-changer, transitioning ship maintenance from a reactive to a

proactive paradigm.

In conclusion, the proposed invention is a testament to the confluence of technological

advancements and pressing industry needs. By seamlessly marrying the capabilities

5 of multiple cameras with state-of-the-art computational algorithms, it offers a

groundbreaking solution to a longstanding maritime challenge. As ships continue to

be the backbone of global trade, innovations like this not only enhance operational

efficiency but also play a pivotal role in ensuring maritime safety, making the oceans

a bit safer for every vessel that sails.

10

15

13
 We Claim:

1. A system for 3D model construction of inner walls of ship propellers,

comprising: multiple cameras positioned at strategic angles to capture

overlapping 2D images of said propeller's inner walls.

5 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the cameras are synchronized to capture

images simultaneously, ensuring uniform lighting conditions and minimal

motion disparities.

3. The system of claim 1, further comprising an advanced processing unit

designed to stitch together captured 2D images into a cohesive 3D model,

10 accounting for depth, curvature, and minor details.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the processing unit employs algorithms to

correct for potential distortions arising from angle of capture, reflections, or

variable lighting conditions.

5. The system of claim 1, further comprising pattern recognition techniques

15 integrated into the processing unit to identify discrepancies, anomalies, or

defects within the 3D model.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein the identified anomalies are highlighted and

cataloged for easy reference by maritime professionals.

14
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the cameras are equipped with adaptive lenses

to automatically adjust focus based on the propeller's depth and contours.

8. The system of claim 1, operable in an underwater environment, with cameras

sealed in watertight casings and equipped with specialized lighting to

5 counteract the diffusive nature of water.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the generated 3D model can be integrated into

simulation software for predictive analyses concerning the propeller's

performance.

10. A method for inspecting ship propellers, comprising: positioning multiple

10 cameras around a propeller, capturing overlapping 2D images, processing said

images into a 3D model, and utilizing pattern recognition to identify potential

defects.

Dated this 15th day of September 2023

Signature:

15 Applicant(s)

Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al.

15
 ABSTRACT

Multiple Camera based System for 3D Model Construction of Inner Walls of

Ship Propeller from 2D Images

A novel system and method designed for the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of

5 ship propeller inner walls from two-dimensional (2D) images. This system employs

multiple strategically-positioned cameras that work collaboratively to capture

overlapping images of a propeller. These captured images are then processed using

advanced algorithms, merging them seamlessly into a detailed and accurate 3D

representation. Beyond the creation of the model, the system is equipped to identify

10 discrepancies or potential defects, serving as an indispensable tool for maritime

professionals to ensure optimal propeller performance and safety.

Dated this 15th day of September 2023

Signature:

15 Applicant(s)

Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al.

16
Applicant(s) Name: Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al.
Total No. of sheet 1
Sheet No.1 of 1

Figure 1: Proposed system design diagram

Dated this 15th day of September 2023

Signature:

Applicant(s) Name: Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al.


STATEMENT AND UNDERTAKING UNDER
1. Name of the applicant(s).
2. Name, address and nationality of
the joint applicant.
Name of the Date of
Country Application
- -
3. Name and address of the
assignee
FORM 3
THE PATENTS ACT,
1970 (39 of 1970)
and
THE PATENTS RULES, 2003
SECTION 8
(See section 8; Rule 12)
I/We Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al., all are citizen of India,
Address of one of the Applicant: Associate Professor,
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of
Aeronautical Engineering, Hyderabad, 500043.
(i) that I/We have not made any application for the
same/substantially the same invention outside India
Or
(ii) that I/We who have made this application No…
dated alone/jointly with ......................................... ,
made for the same/ substantially same invention,
application(s) for patent in the other countries, the
particulars of which are given below:
Applicatio Status of the Date of Date of grant
n No. Application Publication
- - - -
(iii) that the rights in the application(s) has/have
been assigned to ……………… none
……………………
…………………………………………………………
………………………… that I/We undertake that
upto the date of grant of the patent by the
Controller, I/We would keep him informed in writing
the details regarding corresponding applications
for patents filed outside India within six months
from the date of filing of such application.
Dated this 15th day of September 2023
 4. To be signed by the applicant or his authorized Signature:
registered patent agent.

5. Name of the natural person who has signed.

Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al.
Name of the Applicant(s)
To
The Controller of Patents,
The Patent Office, at
Chennai
Note.- Strike out whichever is not applicable;
 FORM- 5
THE PATENTS ACT, 1970
(39 of 1970)
&
The Patents Rules, 2003
DECLARATION AS TO INVENTORSHIP
[See Section 10(6) and Rule 13(6)]

1. NAME OF THE APPLICANT(S)

I/We Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al., all are citizen of India, Address of one of the
Applicant: Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of
Aeronautical Engineering, Hyderabad, 500043.
hereby declare that the true and first inventor(s) of the invention disclosed in the
complete specification filed in pursuance of my / our application numbered
__________ dated 15-09-2023 is/are

2. INVENTOR(S)

(a) NAME (b) NATIONALITY (c) ADDRESS

1. Dr. S. Sathees Kumar Associate Professor,

2. Dr. Ranu Gupta
3. Mr. Ashutosh Pandey
4. Ram Ji Dixit
5. S. Riyazbanu
6. J. Immanuel Durai Raj
7. Dr. Mahesh R. Shukla
Department of Mechanical
Indian Engineering, Institute of
Aeronautical Engineering,
Hyderabad, 500043
Assistant Professor, Department
of Electronics and
Communication Engineering
Indian (ECE), Jaypee University of
Engineering and Technology,
AB Road, Raghogarh, Guna,
(MP), India, 473226
Assistant Professor, Department
Indian of Civil Engineering, MATS
University, Raipur, India, 493441
Assistant Professor, Department
of MCA, ABES Institute of
Indian
Technology, Ghaziabad, Uttar
Pradesh
Assistant Professor, Department
of CSE, K.S.R.M. College of
Indian
Engineering, Kadapa, Andhra
Pradesh, 516003
Assistant Professor, Department
of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian St. Joseph's Institute of
Technology, OMR, Chennai,
600119
Indian Associate Professor & Head,
 Mechanical Engineering
Department, MKSSS Cummins
College of Engineering for
Women, Hingna, Nagpur,
441110
8. Prof. Amruta Jagdish Assistant Professor, Department
Killol of Civil Engineering, Ajeenkya
Indian
D.Y.Patil School of Engineering,
Lohgaon, Pune
9. Dr. Rakesh Kumar Associate Professor,
Pandey Department of Civil Engineering,
Indian
MATS University Raipur, India,
493441
3. DECLARATION TO BE GIVEN WHEN THE APPLICATION IN INDIA IS FILED
BY THE APPLICANT(S) IN THE CONVENTION COUNTRY: -
N.A.
We the applicant(s) in the convention country hereby declare that our right to apply
for a patent in India is by way of assignment from the true and first inventor(s).
Dated this 15th day of September 2023
Dr. S. Sathees Kumar et. al.
Applicant(s)
To,
The Controller of Patents
The Patent Office, Chennai