Healthscope 202X, Vol X(X): XX-XX

ARTICLE TYPE (Choose RESEARCH ARTICLE or REVIEW ARTICLE)

The impact of coronavirus (Covid-19) on online business in Malaysia

First Author1*, Second Author2, Third Author1,2
1
Centre of Environmental Health and Safety, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan
Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia; 2Syngenta, Jealott’s Hill
International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6EY, United Kingdom

Abstract:
A well-prepared abstract enables the reader to identify the basic content of a document quickly and
accurately, to determine its relevance to their interests, and thus to decide whether to read the
*
Corresponding Author document in its entirety. The Abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory,
provide a clear statement of the problem, the proposed approach or solution, and point out major
Corresponding author’s findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be 100 to 200 words in length. The abstract should
name be written in the past tense. Standard nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should be
Email: xxx@uitm.edu.my avoided. No literature should be cited. The keyword list provides the opportunity to add keywords,
used by the indexing and abstracting services, in addition to those already present in the title.
Judicious use of keywords may increase the ease with which interested parties can locate our
article (9 pt).

Keywords: (Alphabetical order, not more than 5, separate by comma)

1. INTRODUCTION the theory and/or the proposed method/algorithm (Brader,

2009).
The Introduction should provide a clear
background, a clear statement of the problem, the relevant 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
literature on the subject, the proposed approach or solution,
Explaining research chronological, including research
and the new value of research which it is innovation. It
design, research procedure (in the form of algorithms,
should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range
Pseudocode or other), how to test and data acquisition (Klein
of scientific disciplines. In-text citation of one reference
& Aubry, 2017). The description of the course of research
from a publication by one or two authors, name of both
should be supported references, so the explanation can be
authors should be written (Brader, 2009; Laudon & Traver,
accepted scientifically (U.S. Food and Drug Administration,
2016). In-text citation from a publication written by three or
2018).
more authors, the name of the first author should be used and
followed by “et al.,” (Iansiti et al., 2017). The terms in Tables and Figures are presented center, as shown in Table 1
foreign languages are written italic (italic). The text should and Figure 1, and cited in the manuscript before appeared.
be divided into sections, each with a separate heading and
numbered consecutively. The section/subsection headings
should be typed on a separate line, e.g., 1. Introduction Table 1. The performance of ...
(Doyle, 2017). Authors are suggested to present their articles Variable Speed (rpm) Power (kW)
in the section structure: Introduction-the comprehensive x 10 8.6
theoretical basis and/or the Proposed Method/Algorithm- y 15 12.4
Research Method-Results and Discussion-Conclusion. z 20 15.3
Literature review that has been done author used in the qψ
chapter "Introduction" to explain the difference of the qψ uk+2 α = π/3 uk+1

manuscript with other papers, that it is innovative, it are used

Tangential flux
component

in the chapter "Research Method" to describe the step of k+2 Subsector II ψs ψ

d

research and used in the chapter "Results and Discussion" to k

k+1
sr
Subsector I
α = π/6

support the analysis of the results (Arruda-Filho et al., 2010). r

If the manuscript was written really have high originality,

which proposed a new method or algorithm, the additional
α=0

chapter after the "Introduction" chapter and before the Figure 1. Effects of selecting different switching under dynamic
"Research Method" chapter can be added to explain briefly condition

© 2021 Faculty of Health Sciences, UiTM 1

Healthscope 202X, Vol X(X)
Principle Author et al.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this section, it is explained the results of research and
at the same time is given the comprehensive discussion.
Results can be presented in figures, graphs, tables and others
that make the reader understand easily (Laudon & Traver,
2016; Iansiti et al., 2017). The discussion can be made in
several sub-chapters.
Laudon, K.C. & Traver, C.G. (2016). E-commerce: Business,
technology, society (12th ed.). Pearson.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2018, February 14).
Traumatic brain injury: FDA actions and research.
http://usgov.info/2018/02/14/traumatic-brain-injury-fda-
actions-and-research/

3.1. Sub section 1

xx

3.2. Sub section 2

yy

4. CONCLUSION
Provide a statement that what is expected, as stated in the
"Introduction" chapter can ultimately result in "Results and
Discussion" chapter, so there is compatibility. Moreover, it
can also be added the prospect of the development of
research results and application prospects of further studies
into the next (based on result and discussion).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Xx xxx

REFERENCES
The main references are international journals and proceedings. All
references should be to the most pertinent, up-to-date sources and
the minimum of references are 25. References are written in APA
style. Please use a consistent format for references – see examples
below (9 pt):

Arruda-Filho, E., Cabusas, J., & Dholakia, N. (2010). Social

behavior and brand devotion among iPhone
innovators. International Journal of Information
Management, 30(6), 475-480.
Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How
emotional appeals in political ads work. University of Chicago
Press.
Doyle, A. (2017, July 1). Best questions to ask at a job interview:
What to ask the employer during a job interview. The balance
careers. The Balance. https://www.thebalance.com/questions-
to-ask-in-a-job-interview-2061205
Iansiti, M., Lakhani, K. R., McBrien, K., & Moon, M. (2017).
Managing our hub economy: Strategy, ethics, and network
competition in the age of digital superpower. Harvard Business
Review, 95(5), 84-92.
Klein, G., & Aubry, M. (2017). Introducing the issue on
megaprojects. Project Management Journal, 48(6), 3-4.

© 2021 Faculty of Health Sciences, UiTM 2

Healthscope 202X, Vol X(X)
Principle Author et al.

© 2021 Faculty of Health Sciences, UiTM 3

Healthscope 202X, Vol X(X)
Principle Author et al.

© 2021 Faculty of Health Sciences, UiTM 4

Healthscope 202X, Vol X(X)
Principle Author et al.

© 2021 Faculty of Health Sciences, UiTM 5

Healthscope 202X, Vol X(X)
Principle Author et al.

© 2021 Faculty of Health Sciences, UiTM 6