You are on page 1of 4

KEY POINTS

Chapter 1

 Social media, a valuable tool for connection, raises concerns about body image satisfaction in
young adults.
 Aparicio-Martínez et al. (2019): Extensive social media usage linked to higher levels of body
image satisfaction.
 Shen et al. (2022): Peer pressure, especially body-related discussions, influences body image
satisfaction.
 In Indonesia, unrealistic portrayals of weight and skin color create pressure on media consumers
(Garbett et al., 2023).
 Singapore: Peer influence shapes teenage girls' views of unattainable beauty standards (Chua &
Chang, 2016).
 Malaysia: Social media imposes pressure to meet "ideal" standards (Khodabakhsh & Chan,
2020).
 Australia: High emphasis on looks in social media negatively impacts body image and well-being
(Jarman et al., 2021).
 Philippines: Online influences from peers affect body image satisfaction, both positively and
negatively (Juangco, 2023).
 Davao City research reveals that familial, peer, and social media pressures distort self-worth and
body image (Escoton et al., 2023).
 Adolescents exposed to social media can develop negative perceptions and ideals, impacting
body image satisfaction (Jyotsana, 2018).

Lack of research on the relationship between peer pressure and body image satisfaction is a significant
gap.

This study aims to raise awareness among students about the impact of social media and peer pressure
on body image satisfaction.

The research will provide insights into positive self-perception and encourage a reevaluation of
surroundings for a more positive outlook.

Results will be shared with teachers and administrators to confirm validity and reliability, benefiting
senior high school students.

 Social media is a powerful tool for connection and content sharing.


 Concerns about body image satisfaction are rising due to social media usage and peer pressure.
 Studies show a correlation between extensive social media use and higher levels of body image
satisfaction.
Global Perspectives:

Indonesia: Unrealistic media portrayals create pressure on young women.

Singapore: Peers shape beauty standards, influencing self-presentation for online validation.

Malaysia: Social media pressures individuals, especially teenagers, to meet "ideal" standards.

Australia: Social media emphasis on looks negatively impacts body image and well-being.

Philippines Insights:

Young peers in Manila are vulnerable to online influences shaping their body image perceptions.

Davao City: Familial, peer, and social media pressures converge, distorting self-worth and body image
satisfaction.

Research Gap:

 Limited studies on the relationship between peer pressure, social media, and body image
satisfaction.
 The complex interplay among these variables needs further exploration.

Study Objectives:

 Investigate how exposure to social media and peer pressure influences students' body image
satisfaction.
 Raise awareness among students about potential impacts on body image.
 Provide insights for positive self-perception and environmental reevaluation.

Benefits:

 Help students gain knowledge and awareness regarding their body image satisfaction.
 Encourage positive self-perception and critical evaluation of their surroundings.
 Present findings to teachers and administrators for validation and awareness.

Future Implications:

 Addressing the identified gaps can contribute to understanding and addressing youth-related
issues.
 The study offers evidence for future research and interventions related to body image
satisfaction.

Dissemination:

 Senior high school students will receive electronic copies of the paper, ensuring transparency
and sharing research outcomes.

This study aims to bridge the research gap and provide valuable insights into the intricate
relationship between social media, peer pressure, and students' body image satisfaction.
Chapter 2

RRL

Social Media Usage:

 Accessibility and ease of smartphones contribute to excessive social media use (Prakasha et al.,
2023).
 Social media serves as a coping mechanism and entertainment alternative (Prakasha et al.,
2023).
 Idealized body images on social media can harm students' body satisfaction (Tufail et al., 2022).
 Persuasive design elements enhance addictive social media usage among students (Tufail et al.,
2022).
 Social media impact categorized into image-based, comparison-based, belief-based, and
consumption-based dimensions.

Peer Pressure:

 Peer pressure significantly influences adolescents, shaping identity and behavior (Hartney, 2022)
 Positive and negative effects of peer pressure, affecting substance abuse and sexual behavior
(Jacobsen, 2023).
 Yielding to peer pressure involves being influenced to fit in or do something uncomfortable
(Saxena, 2023).
 Resistance to peer pressure influenced by personal factors, cognitive functions, and experiences
(Wijnen & Veenstra, 2021).
 Peer engagement impacts social development, identity formation, and behavioral patterns
(Murugesan, 2019).

Body Image Satisfaction:

 Body image satisfaction influenced by societal norms, media portrayals, cultural beliefs, and
personal experiences.
 Social media exposure correlates with body dissatisfaction, particularly in appearance-focused
activities (Sandhu & Sandhu, 2021).
 Poor body image linked to emotional and behavioral problems, including anxiety and depression
(Ren et al., 2018).
 Personal qualities, gender, and personality attributes influence body image satisfaction (Kujawa
& Budnik-Przybylska, 2023).
 Perceived social support helps overcome body image concerns (Baltaci et al., 2021).

Appearance and Social Interactions:

 Appearance consciousness during social interactions impacts body image satisfaction


(McDonnell & Mutlu, 2021).
 Positive comments on social media common, negative comments problematic (Paddock & Bell,
2021).
Cultural Values and Empowerment:

 Cultural values influence body image perceptions and ideals (Bayhan et al., 2018).
 Empowerment, body positivity, and defying beauty standards contribute to positive body image
(Chiat, 2021; Jennings, 2021; Gelsinger, 2021).

You might also like