CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
The challenge of 21st century education is to make teaching and learning
meaningful to the learners. Students need to engage in authentic and relevant activities
that develop life-long learning competencies. To achieve this target, teachers use diverse
teaching methods including inquiry, guided discovery, discussion and cooperative
learning. Among all of these Cooperative learning are one of the greatest success stories
in the history of educational research. Cooperative learning is a study approach aimed to
manage classroom activities into academic and social learning experiences
(Yusnani,2018). Cooperative learning is not merely arranging the students into groups
but it has been proved as structuring positive interdependence.
Furthermore, Cooperative learning method pressumes that team effort of students
toward a single goal of learning a particular aspect result in more understanding than solo
effect. On the contrary of this research states that through inquiry approach students
require to raise question find the answer by their own to cope up with a new student
centered ( individualized approach) in teaching and learning science (Walsh, 2015).
According to Heins meta-analysis of research, learning is a social activity. Learning is
intimately associated with the connection of teachers, peers, family as well as casual
aquaintance (Giron, 2015). Indeed, cooperative learning environment sets the stage for
the students to learn valuable collaboration and social skills that will be of use throughout
their lives.
1
In the same manner, cooperative learning activities are carefully structured in
which students are held accountable for the contribution and participation in learning.
Students are also provided incentives to work as a team in teaching others and learning
from others (Slavin, 2008). However, conflict in the classroom may arise due to several
factors such as miscommunication, exclusion, inability to express feelings appropriately
and the lack of care and respect for each other (Kneidler, 2010). The help of cooperative
learning, students have more opportunities to actively participate in their learning by
questioning, sharing, discussing their ideas to gain motivation and self-esteem.
According to Valdez (2010) there are five basic elements that allow succesful
small group learning / cooperative learning: (1) positive interdependence, (2) face-to-face
interaction, (3) individual and group accountability, (4) group behaviors, and (5) group
processing.
Cooperative learning changes students' and teacher's roles in classroom. The
ownership of teaching and learning is shared by group of students and is no longer the
sole responsibility of the teacher. Along with improving academic learning, cooperative
learning helps the students engage in thoughtful discourse and examine different
perspectives and it has been proven to increase student's self-esteem, motivation and
empathy.
Some challenges of using cooperative learning include releasing the control of
learning, managing the noise levels, resolving conflicts and assesing student learning.
Carefully structured activities can help students learn the skills to work together
2
successfully and structured discussion and reflection on group process can help avoid
some problems.
Organizing students in cooperative learning groups can lead to a gain as high as
28 percentiles in measured students achievements (Madrigal, 2011). Other researchers
report that cooperative learning typically results in higher group and individual
achievement, healthier relationships with peers, more metacognition and greater
psychological health and self-esteem. (Jaguador, 2012).
Using cooperative learning not only provides opportunities for students to develop
interpersonal skills but also gives them authentic experiences that will help them be
successful in their future careers.
The reason why the researchers chose Grade 10 students as the respondents of
their study because they are capable enough to deal with other students and build their
trust to their peers in performing any cooperative learning activities as presented by the
teacher. The researchers arrived in this study to find out the extent of cooperative
learning on the level of academic performance of Grade 10 students of EMA EMITS
College Philippines. Also, researchers wanted to know the different cooperative learning
strategies that can enhance the learning capabilities of the students.
Statement of the Problem
This study aimed to determine the possible relation between cooperative learning
and the student's academic performance based on grades.
3
Specifically, it sought answers to the following questions:
1. What is the perception of Grade 10 students on the extent of cooperative learning in
terms of:
1.1 Think-Pair-Share;
1.2 Groupworks/activities; and
1.3 Experiment?
2. What is the level of academic performance of Grade 10 students in terms of:
2.1 First Quarterly Grades?
3. Is there a significant relationship between the extent of cooperative learning (think-
pair-share, groupworks/activities and experiment) and the level of student’s academic
performance based on grades?
Statement of the Hyphothesis
There is no significant relationship between the extent of cooperative learning in
teaching Science and academic performance of Grade 10 students in EMA EMITS
College Philippines for the S.Y. 2018-2019.
Significance of the Study
This study would specifically benefit many sectors of educational institution by
providing data analysis and information evidenced by articles of known educators and
4
theories of great philosphers on the result of the extent of the cooperative learninng in
teaching science and academic performance of students.
School Administrators/ Leaders: The result provided by this study would open
the possibilities of improving active learning of students through the use of cooperative
learning methods by conducting relevant activities which help the students promote the
essence of unity through sharing their knowledge and capabilities to every learners.
Teachers: This study would be able to reassess their teaching style and provide
students opportunities to boost their confidence to participate with the assigned
lessons/activities. Teachers can select appropriate cooperative learning strategies to cope
up the needs of the students' learning.
Parents: This would help them to realize the critical role that lies within them.
Parents can increase their interaction and discussion with their children and be more
responsive and sensitive to their children's social, emotional and intellectual
developmental needs.
Students: This study would enlighten them to enhance their interest,
motivation, and participation in learning. Through their participation in the cooperative
learning activities in Scince, they can able to manage their interpersonal, listening and
critical thinking skills to achieve educational success.
Future Researchers: This may serve as a guideline or source in conducting
related to this study. Researchers can also suggest the importance of cooperative learning
are definitive and they are used to support the position that all types of cooperative
learning are important.
5
Scope and Delimitation of the Study
The extent of cooperative learning on student's academic performance is a kind of
affective aspect in the motivation that influences student's learning success as it relates to
the educational psychology. The scope of cooperative learning included:
think-pair-share, groupworks/activities and experiment.
The limitations of the study were: (1) the analysis on possible relation between
cooperative learning and the academic grade of Grade 10 students at EMA EMITS
College Philippines, (2) for collecting data about cooperative learning, the researchers did
not use triangulation because they collect data from the students only, (3) the research
was conducted to study the student's academic grade and the cooperative learning in the
year 2018-2019, (4) the result of the research can be applied to the target population, the
Grade 10 students of EMA EMITS College Philippines, Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro.
Defibition of Terms
To facilitate better understanding of the study, several terms are hereby defined.
Academic Performance refers to the outcome of education or the extent to
which the students, teachers and institution have been achieved their educational goals.
Performance is characterized by performance on test associated with coursework and the
performance of the students. In this study, it is based on the first quarterly grade of the
students.
6
Cooperative Learning refers to the ability of the students working together to
attain group goals that cannot be obtained by working alone or competitively. It is
method or strategy used by the teachers like think-pair-share, group activities and
experiment that helps a lot on this study.
Experiment is an activity where a number of students work in groups on
carefully designed guided inquiry questions. Materials provide the students with the
means of collecting data through interaction with typical laboratory materials, data
simulation tools or a decision making environment, as well as a series of question that
lead to discovery based learning.
Groupwork/ activity refers to working collaboratively and efficiently. It is one of
the best techniques of all teaching techniques.
Think-Pair-Share is a strategy in which the teacher gives student a task. The
students are given 2-5 minutes to work on it alone (think). Then they form pairs to
discuss their ideas with the whole class (share).
Science is a subject or knowledge about the study of a natural world based on
facts learned through experiment and observation in a given activity.
Theorotical Framework
The main aim of the present research was to find out whether or not any
association exists between the cooperative learning and the academic performance of
their children. It was assumed that the more cooperative learning in academic
performance, the higher the level of understanding of the students. This assumptions
seem to be partly consistent with the theoretical perspective of Kolb (1995) which
7
provides intellectual approach for cooperative learning that comes from experience
wherein the knowledge has to be discovered by themselves to make a difference to their
behavior.
Moreover, Kolb's suggests that students develop a preference for learning in a
particular way. Students may adopt different learning styles in different situations, but
they tend to favor some learning behavior over others. Individuals learn better when the
subject matter is presented in a way that is consistent with their preferred learning style.
The cores of Kolb's four-stage model is a simple description of a learning cycle that
shows how experience is translated through reflection into concepts, which in turn are
used as guides for active experimentation and the choice of new experiences. Kolb refers
to these four stages as concrete experience (CE), reflective observation (RO), abstract
conceptualization (AC) and the active experimentation (AE). These four-stages of Kolb's
model engaged students in a variety of learning style which promote teamwork and
communication skills rather than reading a book or listening to a lecture which does not
provide the same experience. Experiential learning is an opportunity for learners to apply
what they've been taught to solve-real-world challenges through cooperation. Learners
test their understanding of underlying principles, processes, and procedures and can
experiment and adapt their practice to achieve best outcomes.
Constructivism Theory of Piaget (1990) views learning as a process in which a
student actively construct or build new ideas and concept based upon their prior
knowledge and new information. This theory is advisable to teacher's instruction with the
learners to construct knowledge rather than acquire it. The teacher make sure to guide the
students' pre-existing conceptions that take place best in learning group of social
8
situations. Students construct their own meaning by building their previous knowledge
and experience. New ideas and experiences are match against existing knowledge and the
learners construct new adapted rules to make sense of the world. In such an environment
the teacher cannot be in charge of the student's learning, since everyone's view of reality
will be so different and students will come to learning already possessing their own
constructs of the world.
In addition, Gagne's Cognitive Theory suggests task would be best learned by
following a sequence of nine events: (1) gaining attention, (2) informing the learner with
the objective, (3) stimulating recall of prerequisite learning, (4) presenting new material,
(5) providing learning guidance, (6) eliciting performance, (7) providing feedback, (8)
assessing performance and (9) increasing retention and recall.
The Gagne's Nine Level of Learning model give teachers a checklist to use
before they engage in teaching. Each step highlights a form of communication that aids
the learning process. When each step is completed in turn, learners are much more likely
to be engaged and to retain the information or skills that they are being taught. This
focuses to recommended instruction of teacher's teaching method especially with the
cooperative learning method used to enact changes in the development of student's
performance.
Furthermore, this study also anchored on the Zone of Proximal Development
Theory (ZPD) proposed by Lev Vygotsky. It placed considerable emphasis on students'
potential for intellectual growth rather than their intellectual abilities at a particular point
of time. The ZPD defined as the distance between student's actual development level as
determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development
9
through adults guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers. Additionally, this
theory emphasizes the social aspects of learning by recognizing the full potential of the
learners. The teacher plays a very important role to impart knowledge and develop the
means of communication between student's peer much important learning by the child
occurs through social interaction with a skillful tutor. The tutor may model behaviors
and/or provide verbal instructions for the child. The child seeks to understand the actions
or instructions provided by the tutor (often the parent or teacher) then internalizes the
information, using it to guide or regulate their own performance.
Lastly, Social Learning Theory proponent by Albert Bandura agrees with the
behaviourist learning theorist of classical and operant conditioning whereas he adds two
important ideas: mediating process occur between stimuli and response and behavior is
learned from the environment through the process of observational learning. This theory
is relevant to the previous study as students are all taking part in the social learning
theory as they interact and learn social skills from one another. They tend to develop
about communicative skills and social skills that include asking for clarification,
checking the understanding of others explaining acknowledging contributions, asking
others to contribute, praising others, verifying consensus, and mediating conflicts. It is
important for children to directly learn from experiences in the classroom and have
interactions with others. They are also developing in a positive way both socially and
academically through social learning.
10
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
IV DV
Extent of Cooperative Learning Level of Academic Performance
i n t e r m s o f : in terms of:
1.1 Think- Pair-Share; 2.1 First Quarterly grade.
1.2 Groupworks/activities; and
1.3 Experiment.
Figure 1. Hypothesized Relationships between Variables
The paradigm illustrates the relationship between two variables: the independent
variable and the dependent variable. The independent variable is the extent of cooperative
learning wherein the indicators include think-pair-share, groupworks/activities, and
experiment while the dependent variable is the level of student's academic performance
based on grades.
The one-headed arrow represents the relationship between the independent
variable (extent of cooperative learning) and the dependent variable (level of student's
academic performance based on grades).
11
.
12