You are on page 1of 1

SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO THE 2017 BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN

TAXATION AUGUST 8, 2019

VI. Heeding the pronouncement of the President that the worsening traffic condition in
the metropolis was a sign of economic progress, the Congress enacted Republic Act
No. 10701, also

known as An Act Imposing, a Transport Tax on the Purchase of Private Vehicles. Under
RA 10701, buyers of private vehicles are required to pay a transport tax equivalent to
5% of the total purchase price per vehicle purchased. RA 10701 provides that the Land
Transportation Office (LTO) shall not accept for registration any new vehicles without
proof of payment of the 5% transport tax. RA 10701 further provide that existing owners
of private vehicles shall be required to pay a tax equivalent to 5% of the current fair
market : value of every vehicle registered with the LTO. However, RA 10701 exempts
owners of public utility vehicles and the Government from the coverage of the 5%
transport tax. A group of private vehicle owners sue on the ground that the law is
unconstitutional for contravening the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Rule
on the constitutionality and validity of RA 10701. (5%). SUGGESTED ANSWER RA
10701 is valid and constitutional. A levy of tax is not unconstitutional because it is not
intrinsically equal and uniform in its operation. The uniformity, rule does not prohibit
classification for purposes of taxation (British American Tobacco v. Jose Isidro N.
Camacho, G.R. No. 163583, August 20, 2008, 562 SCRA 511). Uniformity of taxation,
like the kindred concept of equal protection, merely requires that all subjects or objects
of taxation, similarly situated are to be treated alike both in privileges and liabilities.
Unifor-. mity does not forfend classification as long as: (1) the standards that are used
therefore are substantial and not arbitrary, (2) the categorization is germane to achieve
the legislative purpose, (3) the law applies, all things being equal, to both present and
future conditions, and (4) the classification applies equally well to all those belonging to
the same class (Rufino R. Tan v. Ramon R. Del Rosario, Jr., G.R. Nos. 109289 and
109446, October 13, 1994, 237 SCRA 324, 331). All of the foregoing requirements of a
valid classification having been net and those which are singled out are a.class. in
themselves, there is no violation of the “Equal Protection Clause” of the Constitution.

You might also like