Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TOPIC 1: teams
Case study: by an outside organization (like Harvard), that sell them to schools
Management principles
What is this module about?
- Developing an understanding of the main theories that inform managerial practice in
organizational life
- Developing an appreciation of the complexity of managing people and organisations in an
increasingly uncertain and global environment
Why theory?
A theory is “what we know to be true” at this moment in time, subject to change/revision and is
based upon clearly defined assumptions
- academic description of the real world, but complexity of the world goes sometimes against
theories), goes sometimes against reality (people’s assumptions to avoid reality)
There will always be more than one theory to consider. Different theories are based upon different
assumptions
What is practice?
Practice is what connects actors, material things, and ideas
The key management practice is control (objective of a manager, negative or positive? Mostly
positive, make sure that things go forward, be aware of how it is going (monitor), and help
employees to work better, and achieve the goals of the firm)
TEAMs introduction
We begin with the first question: “are two (or more) heads better than one?”
Too many people: process can go slower
Many points of view, better ideas if several people
Some people prefer to work alone
PROS AND CONS
Based on several comprehensive reviews of studies that examined various concept-mastery,
creativity, problem-solving, and judgment tasks, it appears that group performance, often,
although not always, exceeds that of individuals
Ex: if each individual does 1 good, if 5 of them are in team, do they produce more than 5?
(e.g Gigone&Hastie, 1997; Hill 1982; Kerr, MacCoun&Kramer, 1996; Vollrath, Sheppard, Hinsz &
Davies, 1989)
The “romance of teams”
(Allen; Hecht,2004)
Groups
= two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular
objectives
Could just be a collection of individuals, not selected by anybody to produce tasks
VS Team: When you are selected, the composition of the team is thought
Ex: sport, when they work together they are better
Groups-types
Formal groups (do a task, like in military)
- command
- task
ex: ask to dig a hole, the more people, the better (the faster) = more bodies
Informal groups (more social, like a book group)
- Interest
- Friendship (not required, but comes from it)
Influence of groups
The presence of others strongly influences individual behavior
As a part of the group, you influence it too
Ex: different groups within a company to achieve something (even within them smaller and smaller groups)
Conversely, the behaviour of individuals is affected by being part of a group
Business requires groups, therefore how groups work influences how individuals behave and work
Groups vs teams
Group: interacts to share information and make decisions to help each group member perform
his/her area of responsibility
Ex: book group (share info with each other, everybody is equal there)
Team: a group whose individual efforts result in a performance that is greater than the sum of the
individual inputs
(un pour tous tous pour un)
Engineer group of individuals that have some skills, making the whole thing more powerful and efficient
Common purpose/common approach: team created for a common purpose; they want to get
somewhere by a common approach (sport)
Mutual accountability: if the team fails, who is accountable = everyone
Accountability (=be responsible for it whether is succeeds or fails)
Ex: if the team loses the game = everybody’s fault
If fails: maybe they could have done smthg ahead of time to fix the issue
Groups vs teams
Swim “team” – is this a group or a team?
People have been selected for their ability
Common goal: win the competition
So, it is a team
EX: Relai: measure of success= time at the end (we care about who starts and who ends the relai (some of
them are very good starters and intimidate by being very fast at the very beginning, but maybe get tired
very fast / last: they are the best under pressure, so they must be last ))
COMPLEMENTARY SKILLS
Types of teams
Degree of formality
- Formal teams deliberately created (figure 17.2)
- Informal groups form spontaneously
Physical separation
- Increasingly common-for example, Cisco Systems
Permanence
Formal teams
(figure 17.2)
Team composition
Putting complementary skills together
Diversity of members implies that people take on diverse team roles
Task
Initiator, information seeker, etc
Maintenance
Encourager, peacekeeper, clarifier, etc
(from Meredith Belbin’s research on team roles)
Task 15 minutes
Complete Belbin’s self perception questionnaire (on Moodle)
Identify your dominant role(s) and discuss how this could relate to your role within a group/team
Teams-formation
Stages of team development
- Forming
- Storming
- Norming
- Performing
- Adjourning
Virtual teams
What are their characteristics and impact on team performance?
Virtual team is characterized bu
Members
- Physically dispersed
- Culturally differentiated
- Organizationally differentiated
Communication must transcend:
- Space
- Time
- Culture
Virtual teams-findings
For teams physically distributed and engaged in novel tasks, ease of communication and “routine-
ness” of tasks leads to higher performance
For teams culturally and organizationally diverse clarification of roles and a common team culture
lead to higher performance
Team processes
Effective teams develop deliberate processes
Common approach
Use “norming” stage to agree how they will work together (table 17.4)
Categories of communication
Are conscious of which types help or hinder the team
Observing the team
Develop the skill of observing how team processes are working and suggesting improvements
Summary
Teams are widely used, yet performance is often inadequate
Models outlined enable you to analyze systematically a team’s composition, stage of development
and working processes
Doing this analysis will help you to improve the performance of teams in which you work
Teams have disadvantages and are not always worth the investment they need to work well
TO SUM UP:
1. Join in
2. Invest
3. Design (architect didn’t get paid but get recognition if their design is the one selected, which will
bring them earnings in the future)
Eden’s management have been thinking up new ways to motivate people to continue to support the
project as enthusiastically as they have done so far
What is motivation?
- Motivation–the process by which a person’s efforts are energized, directed, and sustained
toward attaining a goal.
- At the most basic level, we are driven to heighten positive emotion or mood, and to reduce
negative feelings.
- Our emotional reactions in turn influence the likelihood that we will engage in an activity next
time – they positively or negatively reinforce us. the way we react influences others and vice-
versa
Psychological contract
- Psycho contract – set of mutual expectations of individuals about what he/she will contribute to
the organization and what the organization will provide in return
- Perceptions of fairness affects behavior
- Varies with context- national differences (See book The Culture Map): people have different
expectations about how the boss should act
Psycho contract
Individual contributions Organizational inducements
Effort Pay
Ability Job security
Loyalty Benefits
Skills Career opportunities
Time Status
Competencies Promotion opportunities
Case study
He visionary: Tim Smit
How did he motivate all The parties required, to realize its vision?
Steve jobs and management by meaning
Physiological needs: a person’s needs for food, drink, shelter, sexual satisfaction, and other
physical needs.
Safety needs: a person’s needs for security and protection from physical and emotional harm.
Social needs: a person’s needs for affection, belongingness, acceptance, and friendship.
Esteem needs: a person’s needs for internal factors (e.g., self-respect, autonomy, and
achievement) and external factors (such as status, recognition, and attention).
Self-actualization needs: a person’s need to become what he or she is capable of becoming.
Herzberg (cont)
The mentioned these much less frequently when describing the bad times
When talking about the bad times, they most frequently recalled these factors:
- Company policy and administration (felt like the rules had been created for situations that did
not correspond to theirs)
- Supervision (task thrown on them)
- Salary (in retrospect, they didn’t pay enough: sometimes they let you go, people see you as
greedy, they accept directly, so you feel like you could’ve asked more, or a pair has more)
- Interpersonal relations
Dissatisfiers: demotivate when not present
Summary
- The psychological contract helps to understand the relationship between organization and
employee
- Content theories of motivation show the diversity of needs which people seek to satisfy at work
- Process theories show the many ways in which people seek to satisfy those needs
- Work design theories link individual needs and organisational requirements