p.s. White beans have been discarded due to unsuccessful growth.

MUNG BEAN HEIGHT MEASUREMENTS

1st week
NON-MAGNETIC
MAGNETIC MUNG
MUNG BEAN
BEAN LEAVES
LEAVES STEM L L
STEM L L 30 14
65 25 38 19
70 27 40 25
85 30 65 33
99 30 68 34
100 35 75 34
102 35 80 35
104 37 87 36
105 37
110 40 90 36
99 36
120 40
104 40
123 40
107 43
135 45

2nd week

MAGNETIC NONMAGNETIC

MUNG MUNG
BEAN BEAN
LEAVES LEAVES
STEM L L STEM L L
80 25 55 20
85 30 65 20
90 30 70 25
107 33 70 40
110 35 75 40
113 35 90 40
119 37 105 40
120 45 110 40
130 47
115 41
135 47
120 46
140 50
120 50
160 50
123 50
3rd week
NONMAGNETIC
MAGNETIC
MUNG
MUNG
BEAN
BEAN
LEAVES
LEAVES
STEM L L
STEM L L
70 24
90 40
75 30
105 40
90 37
120 40
100 40
125 40
110 41
130 45
115 43
130 50
120 44
135 50
120 45
135 50
120 46
140 50
130 47
145 50
130 50
155 50
135 60
170 55

4th week
MAGNETI NONMAGNETIC
C
MUNG
MUNG BEAN
BEAN LEAVES
LEAVES STEM L L
STEM L L
80 30
100 40
80 35
115 45
100 40
125 45
111 40
135 46
120 41
140 50
130 45
140 50
130 45
140 53
130 47
145 54
135 47
150 54
136 50
150 54
140 54
150 55
150 60
170 56
BLACK BEANS MEASUREMENTS
1ST WEEK
NON-MAGNETIC
MAGNETIC
BLACK BEANS
BLACK BEANS
LEAVES
LEAVES
STEM L L
STEM L L
15 10
25 3
15 10
30 10
25 10
35 15
25 14
35 20
30 15
40 20
35 15
45 25
40 17
50 25
55 20
50 26
70 24
60 30
89 40
70 35
90 45
105 45

2nd week
MAGNETI NONMAGNETIC
C BLACK BEANS
BLACK BEANS STEM L LEAVES L
LEAVES 30 15
STEM L L
40 15
40 10
45 20
50 15
50 20
50 23
60 20
60 25
60 20
65 25
65 25
70 30
70 30
70 33
80 30
80 35
100 50
100 40
110 50
110 45
120 50
3rd week
NONMAGNETIC
MAGNETIC
BLACK BEANS BLACK BEANS
LEAVES LEAVES
STEM L L STEM L L
50 20 50 20
60 22 50 20
70 27 50 25
70 30 65 25
70 30 70 25
75 30 70 28
80 35 80 30
100 40 90 35
116 40 95 38
120 50
110 50
130 55
120 55

4th week
MAGNETI NONMAGNETIC
C BLACK
BLACK BEANS
BEANS LEAVE
LEAVES STEM L S L
STEM L L 60 25
70 30 62 30
75 32 65 30
80 35 70 30
80 35 85 30
80 40 90 34
80 40 90 36
90 42 101 39
115 50 105 40
130 50 120 55
135 60
130 53
135 55
PIE CHARTS
Since there are a lot of data covered, the researcher calculated for
the mean of the measurements to be inserted into the pie charts.

MUNG BEANS (MF exposed)

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th week

stem leaves

MUNG BEANS (NON MF exposed)

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th week

stem leaves
 BLACK BEANS (MF exposed)
120

100

80

60

40

20

0
1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th week

stem leaves

BLACK BEANS (NON MF exposed)

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th week

stem leaves

Charts one to four shows the measurements of the 2 kinds of

plants under non exposed and magnetic exposed. These measurements
were taken within different dates of the experiment. These data
will be used to solve for the mean of values and two sample t-
test.

DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION (PAIRED SAMPLE T TEST)

MUNG BEAN
LENGTH OF STEM
WEEK 1
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for
Means

Variab Variab
le 1 le 2
Mean 101.5 46
420.27
Variance 27 790
Observations 12 12
Pearson 0.7213
Correlation 31
Hypothesized
Mean
Difference 0
df 11
9.8756
t Stat 12
P(T<=t) one- 4.19E-
tail 07
t Critical 1.7958
one-tail 85
P(T<=t) two- 8.38E-
tail 07
t Critical 2.2009
two-tail 85

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -9.875612. Since the value of p is < .00001. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of stem
of mung beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.
WEEK 2
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for
Means

Variab Variab
le 1 le 2
 93.166
Mean 115.75 67
559.29 626.69
Variance 55 7
Observations 12 12
Pearson 0.9292
Correlation 25
Hypothesized
Mean Difference 0
df 11
8.4496
t Stat 43
P(T<=t) one- 1.93E-
tail 06
t Critical one- 1.7958
tail 85
P(T<=t) two- 3.87E-
tail 06
t Critical two- 2.2009
tail 85

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -8.449643. Since the value of p is < .00001. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of stem
of mung beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.
WEEK 3
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for
Means

Variab Variab
le 1 le 2
131.66 109.58
Mean 67 33
446.96 461.17
Variance 97 42
Observations 12 12
Pearson 0.9477
Correlation 7
Hypothesized
Mean Difference 0
df 11
 11.095
t Stat 21
P(T<=t) one- 1.3E-
tail 07
t Critical one- 1.7958
tail 85
P(T<=t) two- 2.59E-
tail 07
t Critical two- 2.2009
tail 85
Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the
value of t is -11.095206. Since the value of p is < .00001. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of stem
of mung beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.
WEEK 4
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for
Means

Variab Variab
le 1 le 2
138.33 120.16
Mean 33 67
333.33 523.78
Variance 33 79
Observations 12 12
Pearson 0.9591
Correlation 02
Hypothesized
Mean
Difference 0
df 11
8.4392
t Stat 69
P(T<=t) one- 1.96E-
tail 06
t Critical 1.7958
one-tail 85
P(T<=t) two- 3.92E-
tail 06
t Critical 2.2009
two-tail 85
Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the
value of t is -8. 439269.Since the value of p is < .00001. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of stem
of mung beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION (PAIRED SAMPLE T TEST)

MUNG BEAN
LENGTH OF LEAVES
WEEK 1

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
35.0833 32.0833
Mean 3 3
36.0833 72.0833
Variance 3 3
Observations 12 12
0.92320
Pearson Correlation 1
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 11
t Stat 2.77746
0.00899
P(T<=t) one-tail 3
1.79588
t Critical one-tail 5
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.01798
 5
2.20098
t Critical two-tail 5

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -2.77746. Since the value of p is .01799. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of leaves
of mung beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

WEEK 2

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
38.6666 37.6666
Mean 7 7
75.8787 108.787
Variance 9 9
Observations 12 12
0.86217
Pearson Correlation 6
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 11
0.65465
t Stat 4
0.26307
P(T<=t) one-tail 1
1.79588
t Critical one-tail 5
0.52614
P(T<=t) two-tail 3
2.20098
t Critical two-tail 5

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -0.654654. The value of p is .52614. The result is
not significant at p < .05. Therefore, we accept the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of leaves
of mung beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

WEEK 3

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
46.6666
Mean 7 42.25
28.7878 85.4772
Variance 8 7
Observations 12 12
0.87050
Pearson Correlation 4
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 11
2.89648
t Stat 5
0.00726
P(T<=t) one-tail 8
1.79588
t Critical one-tail 5
0.01453
P(T<=t) two-tail 6
2.20098
t Critical two-tail 5

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -2.896485. Since the value of p is .01454. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of leaves
of mung beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

WEEK 4

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
 1 2
50.1666
Mean 7 44.5
25.7878 66.0909
Variance 8 1
Observations 12 12
0.91825
Pearson Correlation 8
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 11
4.89820
t Stat 9
0.00023
P(T<=t) one-tail 6
1.79588
t Critical one-tail 5
0.00047
P(T<=t) two-tail 3
2.20098
t Critical two-tail 5

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -4.898209. Since the value of p is .00047. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of leaves
of mung beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION (PAIRED SAMPLE T TEST)

BLACK BEANS
LENGTH OF STEM
WEEK 1

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
49.5454 44.4545
Mean 5 5
512.272 763.272
Variance 7 7
Observations 11 11
0.91991
Pearson Correlation 8
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 10
1.50965
t Stat 9
0.08103
P(T<=t) one-tail 1
1.81246
t Critical one-tail 1
0.16206
P(T<=t) two-tail 1
2.22813
t Critical two-tail 9

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -1.509659. Since the value of p is .16206. The
result is not significant at p < .05. Therefore, we accept the
null hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of stem
of black beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.
WEEK 2

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
74.0909 64.5454
Mean 1 5
674.090 602.272
Variance 9 7
Observations 11 11
0.98803
Pearson Correlation 3
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 10
7.61750
t Stat 1
9.02E-
P(T<=t) one-tail 06
1.81246
t Critical one-tail 1
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.8E-05
2.22813
t Critical two-tail 9

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -7.617501. Since the value of p is .00002. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of stem
of black beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.
WEEK 3

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
85.5454 77.2727
Mean 5 3
708.272 586.818
Variance 7 2
Observations 11 11
0.96268
Pearson Correlation 7
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 10
3.74007
t Stat 7
0.00192
P(T<=t) one-tail 3
1.81246
t Critical one-tail 1
 0.00384
P(T<=t) two-tail 6
2.22813
t Critical two-tail 9

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -3.740077. Since the value of p is .00385. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of stem
of black beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

WEEK 4

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
96.8181 89.3636
Mean 8 4
636.363 600.054
Variance 6 5
Observations 11 11
0.91719
Pearson Correlation 3
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 10
2.43762
t Stat 8
0.01749
P(T<=t) one-tail 5
1.81246
t Critical one-tail 1
0.03499
P(T<=t) two-tail 1
2.22813
t Critical two-tail 9

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -2.437628. Since the value of p is .03499. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of stem
of black beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION (PAIRED SAMPLE T TEST)

BLACK BEANS
LENGTH OF LEAVES
WEEK 1

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variabl
1 e2
23.0909
Mean 1 20
134.490
Variance 9 143.6
Observations 11 11
0.89587
Pearson Correlation 1
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 10
1.90065
t Stat 8
 0.04326
P(T<=t) one-tail 4
1.81246
t Critical one-tail 1
0.08652
P(T<=t) two-tail 9
2.22813
t Critical two-tail 9

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -1.900658. Since the value of p is .08653. The
result is not significant at p < .05. Therefore, we accept the
null hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of leaves
of black beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.
WEEK 2

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
30.0909 26.8181
Mean 1 8
148.290 156.363
Variance 9 6
Observations 11 11
0.90835
Pearson Correlation 2
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 10
2.05062
t Stat 5
0.03371
P(T<=t) one-tail 9
1.81246
t Critical one-tail 1
0.06743
P(T<=t) two-tail 8
2.22813
t Critical two-tail 9

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -2.050625. Since the value of p is .06744. the
result is not significant at p < .05. Therefore, we accept the
null hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of leaves
of black beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

WEEK 3

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
34.4545 31.9090
Mean 5 9
120.472 135.290
Variance 7 9
Observations 11 11
0.98416
Pearson Correlation 5
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 10
3.99186
t Stat 2
0.00127
P(T<=t) one-tail 6
1.81246
t Critical one-tail 1
0.00255
P(T<=t) two-tail 2
2.22813
t Critical two-tail 9

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -3.991862. Since the value of p is .00255. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of leaves
of black beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.

WEEK 4
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable Variable
1 2
37.1818
Mean 42 2
121.563
Variance 76.8 6
Observations 11 11
Pearson Correlation #N/A
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 10
3.22428
t Stat 3
0.00455
P(T<=t) one-tail 4
1.81246
t Critical one-tail 1
0.00910
P(T<=t) two-tail 9
2.22813
t Critical two-tail 9

Upon performing a paired sample t-test. We found out that the

value of t is -3.224283. Since the value of p is .00911. The
result is significant at p < .05. Therefore, we reject the null
hypothesis of the paired sample t-test that there is no
statistically significant difference between the length of leaves
of black beans treated with magnetic field and without magnetic
field.
 TABLES AND CHARTS OF THE RESULTS OF THE
EXPERIMENT IN THE IMPACT OF MAGNETIC FIELD