You are on page 1of 1

IV.24.

Stochastic Processes 647

that the word “speed” is not really appropriate.) Ein-


IV.24 Stochastic Processes stein’s method was based on considerations of statis-
Jean-François Le Gall tical physics, which led him to the heat equation
[I.3 §5.4] and then to the Gaussian density that solves
this equation (see section 5.2).
1 Historical Introduction A few years before Einstein, the French mathemati-
Stochastic processes are one of the major themes of cian Louis Bachelier, in his work about the mathemat-
modern probability theory. Roughly speaking, they are ical modeling of stock markets, had already noticed
mathematical models that describe the evolution of the Gaussian distribution of Brownian motion. How-
random phenomena as time goes by. In this article, we ever, Bachelier was dealing not with the physical phe-
shall introduce and illustrate the fundamental ideas of nomenon known as Brownian motion, but rather with
the theory of stochastic processes by concentrating on random walks where the step size was very small. As
the single most important example: Brownian motion. we shall see in sections 2 and 3, the two concepts are
essentially equivalent from a mathematical viewpoint.
We start with a brief historical introduction, in order to
Bachelier pointed out what we call today the Markov
provide some motivation for the mathematical theory
property of Brownian motion: if we wish to predict the
that follows.
displacement after time t of a Brownian particle, then
In 1828, the British botanist Robert Brown observed
knowledge of the path followed by the particle before
the very irregular and wiggly motion of small particles
time t does not help us any more than just knowing
of pollen suspended in water. Brown pointed out the
the position at time t. Bachelier’s arguments were not
unpredictable character of the motion, which appeared
completely satisfactory, and his ideas were not fully
to obey no known physical rule. During the nineteenth
appreciated in his time.
century, several physicists tried to understand the ori-
How does one go about modeling a particle that
gin of this “Brownian motion,” which turned out to
moves in a random way? A first remark is that the posi-
be present in many other physical phenomena. Several
tion of the particle at time t will be a random variable
theories were proposed, some of them rather fanci-
[III.71 §4] Bt . But these random variables will depend on
ful: perhaps Brownian particles were living microscopic
each other: if you know where the particle is at time t,
animals, or perhaps the motion was due to electro-
it will affect your knowledge of how likely it is to be in
static forces. By the end of the century, however, physi-
a certain region at some later time. These two consid-
cists had concluded that the constant changes of direc- erations can be accommodated if we take as our basic
tion in Brownian motion could be explained by the model a set of random variables Bt , one for each non-
impacts on a particle from the molecules of the sur- negative real number, all defined on the same underly-
rounding medium. If the particle was sufficiently light, ing probability space. This, formally speaking, is what
then these numerous collisions could have a macro- a stochastic process is.
scopic influence on its displacement. This explanation This may seem a rather simple definition, but in order
was also consistent with the experimental observation for a stochastic process to be interesting it needs to
that the motion became faster if the temperature of the have additional properties, and difficult mathematical
water, and thus the thermal agitation of its molecules, questions arise as soon as one tries to obtain them. Let
increased. us write Ω for the underlying probability space. Then
Albert Einstein, in one of his three famous 1905 each of the random variables Bt is a function from Ω to
papers, was responsible for a major step forward in R3 , and therefore we associate a point in R3 with each
the understanding of Brownian motion. He worked out pair (t, ω) (where t is a positive real number and ω
that if a Brownian particle starts at the origin, then belongs to Ω). So far we have thought about the prob-
after a fixed time t its position should be randomly dis- ability distribution of Bt , so we have been focusing on
tributed according to the (three-dimensional) gaussian what happens when we fix t and let ω vary. However,
distribution [III.71 §5] with mean 0 and variance σ 2 t, we must also consider what happens when we look at
where σ 2 is a constant, called the diffusion constant, a “single instance” of a stochastic process, by fixing ω
that measures how quickly the distribution spreads and letting t vary. For fixed ω, the function that takes t
out with time. (One can think of this loosely as the to Bt (ω) is called a sample path. If we want a rigorous
speed of the Brownian motion, but we shall see later mathematical theory of Brownian motion, then a very

You might also like