Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Macroeconomics I
Lent Term
Empirical evidence on
consumption
Consumption as a Random Walk
Random walk view of consumption
• Changes in consumption should be unpredictable.
• Due to unpredictable events such as a lottery win
or job loss
• Expected changes are planned for due to
permanent-income hypothesis.
• Due to predictable events such as expected salary
raise or new job.
Case Study: Consumption versus Expenditure
Key prediction of model:
• Consumption should not change when an
anticipated event occurs.
However, this doesn’t always hold true.
• Retirement
• Food expenditures decrease
• Calories consumed do not, though
Precautionary Saving
Precautionary saving
• Saving money just in case of an uncertain and
unpredictable event
• Can lead consumers to behave as if they face
borrowing constraints even if they don’t
• May even save when income is low
• Always a possibility of further income decreases
Empirical Evidence on Consumption
Does the evidence agree with the following
assumptions we’ve made?
Individuals with sufficient wealth
• Consumption may obey the permanent-income
hypothesis
• Follow a random walk
Individuals with low wealth or who cannot borrow
• Display much greater sensitivity to current income
Evidence from Individual Households—1
Three main findings:
The permanent-income hypothesis applies to
households with above-average wealth.
• The MPC out of a temporary income shock is low.
• Consumption smoothing is effective.
Low income households
• Behave as if borrowing-constrained
• Engage in precautionary saving
• MPC from income boost is high.
Evidence from Individual Households—2
Many departures from the classical model in the data
• Are individuals really rational?
Behavioral economics
• Research that blends psychology, neuroscience, and
economics
• Goal is to better understand how individuals make
economic decisions.
Case Study: Behavioral Economics and Consumption—1
Economic assumption
• People are rational.
But:
• What if people are bad at math?
• They are not irrational, but may make a “wrong”
decision.
Case Study: Behavioral Economics and Consumption—2
Behavioral considerations from 401(k) plans
• Participation is almost 100 percent when the
default is opt-in.
• Participation is less than 50 percent when
enrollment is not automatic.
Enron
• Employees did not diversify; the default retirement
option was Enron stock.
The default option is “sticky.”
Investment
Investment
Investment in macroeconomics
• In the sense of national income accounting
• Accumulation of physical capital
• Roads, houses, warehouses, tools
• Today’s investment influences future opportunities.
How Do Firms Make Investment Decisions?
How much should a business invest? Remember from Week 3 lecture:
• A business should keep investing in physical capital until 𝑀𝑃𝐾 = 𝑟
Δ𝑝!
𝑀𝑃𝐾 = 𝑟 + 𝑑 −
𝑝!
Marginal product
of capital, MPK
!"!
User Cost: 𝑟 + 𝑑 − "!
Example: Investment and the Corporate Income Tax
Adding a tax component (τ):
r
Rearranging:
r
An Increase in the Corporate Income Tax
From Desired Capital to Investment—1
n Production function
r
Percentage
return in the
bank account
The Arbitrage Equation and the Price of a Stock—2
Solve for the price of stock:
• Group the bank return and capital gains
• Invert the equation
If q > 1
• Value of the firm is greater than the value of its capital.
• Firm should invest in more capital.
If q < 1
• Value of the firm is less than the value of its capital
• Firm should “disinvest.”
Tobin’s q, Physical Capital, and the Stock Market—2
Two basic predictions:
• Value of q should be close to 1.
• Value of q should be a useful predictor of firm investment.
In practice
• Prediction has problems:
• Some capital is created, patented, whereas other capital isn’t.
• Cash flow and access to loans seems to play a role, but are not
in the theory.
• Empirical evidence on the role of q is mixed.