Professional Documents
Culture Documents
vi
Contributors vii
ix
x Foreword
Classroom Teachers
Titles of classroom teachers in the 2017 standards are as follows: PreK/
primary, elementary/intermediate, middle/high school. In Standards 2010,
PreK and elementary classroom teachers were grouped into one role, and
in Standards 2017, PreK/primary and elementary/intermediate classroom
teachers are now two distinct roles. Although there are overlapping profes-
sional knowledge, skills, and dispositions required of these PreK/primary
and elementary/intermediate teachers, there are also distinctly different
bodies of research- based literacy methods and associated foundational
knowledge required for each of these two roles. In Standards 2017, the
role of middle and high school classroom teachers (of students ages 11–
18) describes their responsibilities for teaching language and literacy in the
service of learning disciplinary content (National Governors Association
Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010).
Further, the role of middle and high school reading teacher was deleted
because the work of these professionals is best categorized in the descrip-
tion of reading/literacy specialist.
Principals
In Standards 2010, the title administrator was used. In Standards 2017, the
focus is on the principal, thereby highlighting the importance of the princi-
pal as a literacy leader who understands literacy instruction and has a major
responsibility for facilitating a schoolwide culture of shared leadership and
collaboration that results in a shared vision of literacy teaching and learning.
Foreword xi
Teacher Educators
Although the title of teacher educator remained the same, the Standards
committee, using current research findings, updated the assumptions and
responsibilities for this group of literacy professionals.
Literacy Partners
In previous standards, this category was titled Education Support Person-
nel. In Standards 2017, ILA describes a much broader schema and devel-
oped the title literacy partners to include the following groups: parents
and families; allied professionals, community agencies, and volunteers; and
teaching assistants (formerly education support personnel). The goal was
to emphasize the importance of a host of people, internal and external to
the school, who team with others to make a difference in the literacy lives
of PreK–12 learners.
Standards 2010 contained six standards; in Standards 2017 there are seven.
For all standards, writers updated the content of the components using cur-
rent research evidence. The overarching key change across all standards is
the emphasis on literacy, which is operationally defined as teaching read-
ing, writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and visually representing. Next I
highlight major aspects of each of the standards.
REFERENCES
Bean, R., Kern, D., Goatley, V., Ortlieb, E., Shettel, J., Calo, K., et al. (2015). Special-
ized literacy professionals as literacy leaders: Results of a national survey. Literacy
Research and Instruction, 54(2), 83–114.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2013, April). Interstate Teacher Assessment
and Support Consortium InTASC model core teaching standards and learning
progressions for teachers 1.0: A resource for ongoing teacher development. Wash-
ington, DC: Author.
International Literacy Association. (2015a). Multiple roles of specialized literacy
professionals (Research brief). Newark, DE: Author. Retrieved from www.
l i t e ra c y wo rl d w i d e .o rg /d oc s /d e fa u lt -so u rc e / whe re -we -s t a n d / l i t e ra c y -
professionals-research brief.pdf?sfvrsn=ff3aa28e_10.
International Literacy Association. (2015b). Multiple roles of specialized literacy
professionals (Position statement). Newark, DE: Author. Retrieved from www.
l i t e ra c y wo rl d w i d e .o rg /d oc s /d e fa u lt -so u rc e / whe re -we -s t a n d / l i t e ra c y -
professionals-position-statement.pdf?sfvrsn=f33aa28e_4.
International Literacy Association. (2018). Standards for the preparation of literacy
professionals 2017. Newark, DE: Author.
International Reading Association. (2010). Standards for reading professionals—
revised. Newark, DE: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State
School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards (English language arts).
Washington, DC: Authors.
Preface
The challenges that schools face in the 21st century are many: how to safely
and effectively use new and evolving technological tools available to stu-
dents and teachers; the increasing diversity present in schools and in local
communities; the ever-shifting policies of districts, states, or the nation;
concerns around funding and the high cost of resources; and the increas-
ing demands for accountability. These challenges, as well as others, have
created pressures on schools and especially teachers, who must have the
knowledge, skill sets, and dispositions that enable them, with support, to
address these challenges and provide a high-quality education for every
student.
Those who study schools, school reform, and school improvement
highlight the importance of quality teachers and teaching and address
issues of how to prepare and then support these professionals. Educators
such as Fullan (2001) write about the importance of providing environ-
ments and opportunities that help teachers develop “habits of learning”
(p. 253) that will prepare them to address the challenges that they face.
These new demands and expectations are especially prevalent in the area of
literacy and permeate all curricular domains at all grade levels. As is often
stated, students must learn not only literacy skills, but they also must be
able to use literacy to learn. In other words, literacy provides the founda-
tion for thinking and learning.
There are two major themes in this book that are supported by the
research in the field of education and reflect the beliefs and knowledge of
the editors and authors of this text. Each theme is summarized in the fol-
lowing sections.
xv
xvi Preface
Whether one reads research findings, policy briefs, the local newspapers,
or a social media thread or blog post, there appears to be an ever-growing
awareness of the need for more innovative ways of functioning if schools are
to be successful. An emerging message is that leadership should be shared
by many professionals in schools in ways that reflect their expertise, unique
knowledge, roles, and skills. In addition to traditional administrative lead-
ership, there is a need for leadership by all those who educate students in
schools: literacy coaches or facilitators, teachers, and specialized personnel,
such as reading/literacy specialists, special educators, speech and language
teachers, and content teachers. Such leadership must be seamless; it must
flow top-down, bottom-up, and horizontally. Our belief is that effective
leadership, especially literacy leadership, can be the catalyst for improv-
ing classroom practice and student learning. One of the essential roles of
the PreK–12 principal as a designated leader is to maximize opportuni-
ties for others to assume leadership roles and to foster their capacity to
serve as leaders. Literacy professionals may have formal roles (e.g., literacy
coach), or they may serve informally as leaders (e.g., a classroom teacher
who serves as chair of the curriculum committee). Special educators, psy-
chologists, guidance counselors, and librarians/media specialists all have
specialized knowledge that can enhance the literacy program in schools,
and, as such, they too serve as literacy leaders.
KEY FEATURES
REFERENCES
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teach-
ers College Press.
International Literacy Association. (2018). Standards for the preparation of literacy
professionals 2017. Newark, DE: Author.
Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher
leadership. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171.
Contents
PART I. Roles 1
xix
xx Contents
16. Academic Language and Literacy Development for English Learners 325
MaryEllen Vogt
Who Are the English Learners in Our Schools? 326
What Do Literacy Leaders Need to Know about Appropriate Language,
Literacy, and Content Instruction for English Learners? 332
How Can Literacy Leaders Elevate and Support Teachers’ Language
and Literacy Instruction for English Learners? 338
Conclusion 340
References 341
Language: English
VOL. I.
M.DCCC.XXXI.
LONDON:
J. MOYES, TOOK’S COURT, CHANCERY LANE.
PREFACE.
This little work has been drawn up chiefly for the use of Young
Persons; it is therefore hoped, that should it fall under the eye of
older readers, the purpose for which it is written will be kept in mind.
On the other hand, should any young person meet with passages
he does not perfectly understand, he is recommended not to puzzle
over them, but rather to conclude that those parts of the book may
be intended for people a little further advanced.
It does not seem a settled point, whether, in the estimation of
Juvenile Readers, most interest attaches to a true story, or to one
entirely fictitious; but it may be right to mention, that all the incidents
here related are real.
The advice which the author has taken the liberty of offering to his
Young Friends, as well as the speculations he has occasionally
introduced, contain no opinions but such as he considers might have
proved useful to himself, at some stage of his own professional life.
Putney Heath,
28th March, 1831.
CONTENTS OF VOL. I.
Page
EARLY PREDILECTIONS 1
FIRST GOING AFLOAT 33
SPECIMENS OF COCK-PIT DISCIPLINE 61
BERMUDA IN THE PEACE 100
MIDSHIPMEN’S PRANKS 137
DIVERSITIES IN DISCIPLINE 161
GEOLOGY—NAUTICAL SQUABBLES 179
MAST-HEADING A YOUNG GENTLEMAN 196
KEEPING WATCH 217
DANGERS OF A NOVA SCOTIA FOG 261
BLOCKADING A NEUTRAL PORT 283
THE SCHOOLMASTER AFLOAT 302
FRAGMENTS
OF