Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Online resources
Visit http://login.cengagebrain.com and use the access code that comes
with this book for 12 months’ access to:
• the companion website. You’ll find worksheets for completing
the activities found throughout the text, online research activities
to further explore concepts, a list of useful weblinks, and a
downloadable version of the basic lesson plan (page 290).
• Search me! education. Fast and convenient, this resource
provides you with 24-hour access to full-text articles from
hundreds of scholarly and popular journals and newspapers,
including The Australian and The New York Times. Use Search me!
education to explore topics further and find current references.
Instructor’s guide
The Instructor’s guide provides you with content to help you set
up and administer your subject. It includes learning objectives,
ideas for adjunct teaching and discussion activities, Search me!
terms, and media resource suggestions.
PowerPointTM presentations
Chapter-by-chapter PowerPoint presentations cover the main concepts addressed within the
text, and can be edited to suit your own requirements. Use these slides to enhance your lecture
presentations and to reinforce the key principles of your subject, or for student handouts.
Artwork
The digital files of graphs, tables, pictures and flow charts from the text can be used in a variety
of media. Add them into your course management system, use them within student handouts, or
copy them into lecture presentations.
x
INTRODUCTION
Learning about teaching involves both theoretical and practical components. Learning for Teaching:
Teaching for Learning is written around a framework of three broad areas relating to learning and teaching:
1 Frameworks for teaching introduces a brief history of education with an overview of the
structure of education in Australia at present. It moves on to teaching as a profession and the
roles and responsibilities for pre-service teachers.
2 Preparing for practice addresses the act of teaching, focusing on the day-to-day responsibilities
of classroom practitioners with relevant practical examples.
3 Building relationships for effective classroom organisation and management considers how to make
your classroom operate successfully to ensure teaching and learning is making a difference for
each student.
This practical book examines teaching and learning, encouraging pre-service teachers to develop
their professional ‘personality’, knowledge and skills to make a difference.
Making a Difference
As the man walked along the cliffs at dawn
He noticed a child running on the beach below
Back and forth from washed-up starfish
to the sea.
He caught up with the child and asked
Why are you doing this?
The starfish will die if left in the sun
I’m throwing them back to the sea.
But the beach goes on for miles
And there are thousands of stranded starfish
You can never save them all
How can your effort make a difference?
The child looked at the starfish in his/her hand
And flung it far out to the safety of the sea
I’ve made a difference to that one
The child said.
Katrina Barker is a specialist in educational psychology and learning and teaching. Katrina’s
research focuses upon student motivation and engagement, self-concept, school retention and
classroom management, with particular emphasis on developing positive student behaviour through
a whole-school approach.
Mary Nosworthy has taught all levels of education in Australia and overseas. She has masters
degrees in educational leadership and special education with expertise in teaching English, French,
History and physical education, health and personal development. Her current research focus is on
young adult literature.
Catherine Sinclair has 30 years’ experience as a researcher and educator across all education
levels. Her expertise lies in motivation to teach, teacher professional learning and quality teaching.
xii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors and Cengage Learning would like to thank the following reviewers for their incisive
and helpful feedback:
• Dr Barbara Neilsen – Flinders University
• Dr Noleine Fitzallen – University of Tasmania
• Claire Hall – Edith Cowan University
• Debbie Bradbery – University of Newcastle
• Dr Nina Maadad – University of Adelaide
• Dr Richard Johnson – RMIT University
• Dr Sean Kearney – University of Notre Dame
• Dr Jayne Keogh – Griffith University
• Dr Judy Williams – Monash University
• Suzy Tamone – Queensland University of Technology
• Maria Bennet – Charles Sturt University
PART A
FRAMEWORKS FOR TEACHING
I never teach my pupils. I only attempt to provide the conditions in which they can learn.
Albert Einstein
Schools and the organisations that support them are a result of history and a reflection of the societies
they serve. Schools are intended to prepare students for their future lives but are based upon what was
successful in the past, not taking into account the dramatic differences among different communities.
A range of stakeholders and educational professionals influence decisions about what happens in
schools. Contemporary school systems are responding to changing community and industry
expectations of their graduates. Social, cultural and technological developments impact on the
teaching and learning process and beginning teachers need to be cognisant of all the changes that
occur.
You are starting to learn about teaching and you will be asked to give your opinion on teaching and
learning. Develop your own philosophy of teaching and as you undertake your course, critically review
the national Standards for teaching.
2
1
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF
THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM
IN AUSTRALIA
Any education system is a reflection of the development of the country, its politics, migration,
business, industry, culture and religion. Australia’s education system has experienced many of the
world events which have coloured what education looks like today, but also some particular events
in our history that have shaped education.
Prior to Federation
Prior to Federation of the Australian States in 1901, the six major colonies were administered
directly from Great Britain. Thus, the initial development of any education system was a mirror
image of the school system in Britain. However, the lack of government control occurring in Britain
did not last in the colonies. Since 1800, customs duties had been imposed in order to obtain money
to operate orphan schools. In 1826 the Church of England, through the Church and School Act,
was given a grant of land to support its activities, including a school system. The privilege of the
Church of England was short-lived with the withdrawal of the Act in 1833. In 1848, the Board of
National Education was established to control schools, which were open to all denominations;
however, instruction was left to the clergy of the various religions. This form of government
assistance and control of education is the foundation of the system used throughout Australia to
the present day.
The role of the government in providing for education was maintained in the New South
Wales Public Schools Act of 1866, which established another Board of National Education that
had vested in it the power to grant aid to denominational schools. Between 1872 and 1895 each
colony passed free, compulsory and secular education acts. In 1879, the Catholic bishops of
Australia realised that large numbers of Catholics were not sending their children to Catholic
schools and issued a Joint Pastoral Letter stating that Catholics must send their children to
Catholic schools.
Chapter 1 Historical overview of the educational system in Australia 3
Grants to denominational schools were abolished and education for children between the ages
of six and 14 was made compulsory. So the turning point in education in New South Wales was in
1880 when the Public Instruction Act became law. The Act also made allowances for the
establishment of primary and secondary schools but did not make public education free. Although
State aid had been withdrawn from non-government schools, they continued to develop throughout
the 19th and early 20th centuries, and they welcomed the reintroduction of grants in the 1960s.
With Federation of the six colonies in 1901, the various states maintained their control of
education. In New South Wales, the system was developed in response to the political and
religious factions of the period. The provision of any education remained with the State, the
church, or similar organisations. Attendance was compulsory but in a State as vast as New South
Wales, with many inaccessible rural areas, attendance was difficult to enforce.
Parallel to the development of the primary and secondary education systems was the
introduction of a tertiary level, offered at universities. In 1850, an act incorporated the University of
Sydney. Teaching commenced in 1852; however, the university was required to maintain itself
(Turney, Bygott & Chippendale, 1991). The presence of a university influenced the development of
grammar schools and a curriculum that prepared students for tertiary education.
The Commonwealth Government has a limited, but important role in primary and
secondary education. It provides funds to government and non-government
schools. It finances a number of national programs and, through the Curriculum
Development Council, supports curriculum development in collaboration with the
states.
Colleges of
Advanced
University
Education
doctorate
masters
and masters
degree and
Technical and Further degree
postgraduate
Education Colleges
diplomas
Professional
Institutions
Other
Para-Professional
Trades Undergraduate
Other skills Undergraduate
degree and
degree
Tertiary
Preparatory diploma
Adult education courses
18 courses
17 12
Pre-vocational
16 Pre-apprenticeship 11
Matriculation studies
Secondary
Secondary Education
15 10
• State schools
9 • Independent schools
14
• Catholic schools
13 8
Compulsory Education
Education
12
Special
6
11
5
10
4
9 Primary Education
Primary
3 • State schools
8 • Independent schools
2 • Catholic schools
7
1
6
K
5
Pre-school Education
Preschool
4
• Local and State government
3 • Private agencies
• Churches
School Year
In 1973, the Commonwealth Schools Commission (CSC) was established to ‘advise the
Commonwealth Minister responsible for education about the national policy on schools and to
provide a national focus for discussion and consultation about issues in school-level education’
(Colston, 1988, p. 137).
Chapter 1 Historical overview of the educational system in Australia 5
The Commonwealth’s role in education was redefined in 1987 ‘with the restructuring of the
Commonwealth’s Department of Education, the subsequent establishment of new advisory
structures, and the restructuring of the higher education system’ (Wescombe & Sherington, 1993,
p. 135). As part of the administrative and advisory arrangements of the Education portfolio, the
National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET) was established in July 1988.
The structure of the Board is depicted in Figure 1.2 and highlights the councils responsible for
giving the Federal Minister of Education information and advice regarding primary and secondary
schooling and higher education.
Primary and Secondary Higher Education Employment, Technical Research Priorities and
Education and Further Education Policies
Figure 1.2: The structure of the National Board of Employment, Education and Training until 2000
The administration of public education within each State and Territory had been conducted by
a central authority in the form of a Department of Education. The responsibilities included the
appointment of staff, allocation of resources, the supervision of the operation of schools and the
conditions of service of teachers. Teachers were assumed to be available for appointment to any
school within the State or Territory. Principals had no powers in the selection of staff or the
transfer of staff. Through a network of Assistant Directors General, or their equivalent, responsible
for different regions, the requirements of appointing non-teaching staff, in-service education,
school maintenance and some minor aspects of curriculum development were met. The syllabi
relating to the specific subject areas were prepared by the central committees established within
the Departments of Education. They were detailed directives to teachers, and inspectors were
responsible for ensuring their implementation. It was not until the 1980s that many new
curriculum documents were introduced that had been developed more by committees of teachers
and other educators than by department committees.
The involvement of the community in schools varied from State to State. The major level of
involvement had been from parents who were involved in fundraising and canteen duties. Under
the guise of introducing community involvement into the management of the education system in
government schools, school councils comprising representatives of the school teaching staff and
6 Part A Frameworks for teaching
members of the wider community were formed. Curriculum decision making, the employment of
staff and the broader management of the school soon came within the ambit of the council.
The focus of education had always been in the hands of the States and Territories, but the
central governing body changed with the National Department of Education being established in
2013. This has seen a major change to the development structure in education with six agencies
advising and reporting on important issues. The two major bodies that impact directly on teachers
and schools are the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) and
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL).
The major challenge to teachers and leaders in education has been the introduction of the
national curriculum up to Year 10, which is under the auspices of ACARA, yet State and Territory
bodies administer the implementation of the curriculum. The National Assessment Program (NAP)
coordinates the National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN); and NAP,
which occurs annually on a rolling basis including civics and citizenship, ICT and science literacy.
Details of these assessments and other details are on the My School website (http://
www.myschool.edu.au/), which profiles nearly 10 000 schools and includes the ‘school’s profile,
academic performance, funding sources and financials’.
AITSL promotes ‘excellence in the profession of teaching and school leadership’ (Australian
Government, 2014a).
Australian
Australian
Australian Institute of Tertiary
Curriculum,
Institute for Aboriginal Australian Office for Education
Assessment
Teaching and Torres Research Learning and Quality and
and
and School Strait Council Teaching Standards
Reporting
Leadership Islander (ARC) (OLT) Agency
Authority
(AITSL) Studies (TEQSA)
(ACARA)
(AIATSIS)
1979 Association of Independent Schools employed staff and a range of services are developed
for member schools.
1985 Anglican Schools Commission established to provide affordable Christian education in
the Anglican tradition.
1988 National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET) established.
1988 Committee of Review of New South Wales Schools instituted.
1989 Report published by the Committee of Review of New South Wales Schools.
1989 Excellence and Equity – New South Wales Curriculum Reform – A White Paper on
Curriculum Reform in New South Wales Schools.
1989 Inception of the Higher Education Contribution Scheme [HECS].
1990 School-Centred Education – Management Review: New South Wales Education
Portfolio.
1990 Education Reform Act (New South Wales).
1990 Formal distinctions between Universities and Colleges of Advanced Education removed,
followed by amalgamations.
2000 National Board of Employment, Education and Training abolished.
2002 Northern Territory Education Act revised the Board of Studies, which advises the
minister.
2002 Introduction of the Postgraduate Education Loan scheme [PELS].
2004 South Australia established Teachers Registration Board.
2004 Institute of Teachers Act – sets out the functions and legal basis for accreditation of
teachers in New South Wales.
2007 Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR] formed.
2008 National Curriculum Board first meeting on 23 April.
2010 Establishment of the Committee to Review the Funding arrangement in education led by
Gonski. The review was established to develop a funding system for Australian schooling
which is transparent, fair, financially sustainable and effective in promoting excellent
outcomes for all Australian students (Gonski et al., 2011, p. xiii).
2012 Expansion of the National School Chaplaincy program (ABC RN, 2014).
2013 Department of Education replaces DEEWR. Responsible for ‘national policies and
programmes that help Australians access quality and affordable child care; early
childhood education, school education, post-school, higher education, international
education and academic research’ (Australian Government, 2014b).
2014 Foundation to Year 10 Australian Curriculum implemented in all States and Territories
of Australia (ACARA, 2014).
2
THE CURRENT STRUCTURE
OF SCHOOLING
This chapter examines the development and structure of education in Australia through an
overview of the three levels of government and the systems of education which impact on the types
of schools in each State and Territory.
Federal Government was tertiary education and the structure of universities, making this structure
conform to the demands of the Minister for Education and the committees operating in this area:
Under the Constitution, power with regard to State education remains with the
State Parliaments, but there is no constitutional barrier against the Commonwealth
government making grants to the States for educational purposes, or arranging to
assume responsibility for some areas of State education.
Government
Catholic schools Independent schools
schools
Some researchers believe that a problem affecting education exists with these numerous levels
of administration as the ‘role of government in financing and administering education means that
the education policies of the major political parties are of considerable importance’. Broadly
speaking:
12 Part A Frameworks for teaching
The party of social democratic inclination (the Labor Party) is more likely to
emphasise equitable access, the need for compensatory programs, and the
importance of teacher and parent involvement in decision making. The Liberal
and National parties tend to place more weight on the need to maintain academic
standards, parents’ choice of school, and vocationally relevant curricula.
This three-tiered system of government – the Federal, State and local levels – divides the
responsibility for different areas of governance. Some local governments are responsible for day care
and preschools for children from nought to five years. While local government is generally
responsible for the financial management of centres established in this area, it has little input into
educational management and curriculum planning. Centres formed usually operate on a sessional
basis, accepting children for a number of half- or full-day sessions each week and in many
instances charge fees.
In addition to government bodies which oversee education, there are also religious organisations
such as the Catholic Education Commission and the Catholic Education Office; and groups that
specifically focus on one area of education such as the Kindergarten Union and Association for
Independent Schools. These groups, which undertake various roles in administering education, will
be discussed in more detail in following sections.
University
doctorate
and
masters
Technical and Further degrees
Education Colleges
Professional
institutions
Other
Para-professional
Trades
University
Other skills
undergraduate
Preparatory
degree
Tertiary
Adult education
18 courses
17 12
Pre-vocational
16 Pre-apprenticeship 11
Matriculation studies
Secondary
Secondary Education
15 10
• State schools
• Independent schools
14 9
• Catholic schools
13 8
7
Compulsory Education
Education
12
Special
6
11
5
10
4
9 Primary Education
Primary
3 • State schools
8 • Independent schools
2 • Catholic schools
7
1
6
K
5
Pre-School Education
4
Preschool
School Year
History relates that Jeanne d’Arc was led to the stake the last
day but one of May 1431, and burnt alive by a slow fire, and her
bones and ashes thrown into the Seine.
When, in the 15th and 16th centuries, the memory of Jeanne d’Arc
revived in the minds of historians, the subject invariably served as a
theme for controversy and discussion. It is well known that Charles
VII., to reward the bravery of this exalted heroine, bestowed letters of
nobility upon her brothers and their descendants. Documents
discovered by the learned Père Vignier have led to the supposition
that Jeanne d’Arc subsequently married, and was not therefore burnt
at Rouen, as is commonly believed, but that some other poor
unknown creature was sacrificed in her stead. This opinion, which
sounds paradoxical, is nevertheless supported by weighty evidence.
Father Vignier of the Oratory, a learned and zealous philobiblon,
ever in pursuit of literary discoveries, of which so many are due to
the institution of the Oratory, found during a visit to Metz, while
turning over the archives of that city, the following notice, in a
manuscript register of the events that had taken place there during
the 15th century: “In the year 1436, Messire Phlin Marcou was sheriff
of Metz, and on the 20th day of May of the aforesaid year, came the
maid Jeanne, who had been in France, to la Grange of Ormes, near
St. Privé, and was taken there to confer with any one of the sieurs of
Metz, and she called herself Claude; and on the same day there
came to see her there her two brothers, one of whom was a knight
and was called Messire Pierre, and the other “petit Jehan” a squire,
and they thought that she had been burnt, but as soon as they saw
her they recognised her, and she them. And on Monday the 21st day
of the said month they took their sister with them to Boquelon, and
the sieur Nicole, being a knight, gave her a stout stallion, of the value
of thirty francs, and a pair of saddle cloths; the sieur Aubert Boulle, a
riding hood; the sieur Nicole Grognet a sword; and the said maiden
mounted the said horse nimbly, and said several things to the sieur
Nicole by which he well understood that it was she who had been in
France; and she was recognised by many tokens to be the maid
Jeanne of France who escorted king Charles to Reims, and several
declared that she had been burnt in Normandy, and she spoke
mostly in parables. She afterwards returned to the town of Marnelle
for the feast of Pentecost, and remained there about three weeks,
and then set off to go to Notre Dame d’Alliance. And when she
wished to leave, several of Metz went to see her at the said Marnels
and gave her several jewels, and they knew well that she was the
maid Jeanne of France; and she then went to Erlon in the Duchy of
Luxembourg, where she was thronged, so much so that the son of
the count of Wuenbourg took her to Cologne near his father the
count de Wuenbourg, and the said count loved her greatly, and when
she wished to come away he had a handsome cuirass made for her
to equip her therein; and then she came to the aforesaid Erlon and
there was solemnised the marriage of Monsieur de Hermoise knight,
and the said maid Jeanne, and afterwards the said sieur Hermoise
with his wife the maid, came to live at Metz in the house the said
sieur had, opposite Saint Seglenne, and remained there until it
pleased them to depart.”
Since the discovery made by Père Vignier, this remarkable
document has been inserted in a work entitled: Chronique de Metz,
composé par le doyen de Saint Thiebaut de la même ville. This
chronicle terminates at the year 1445.
Vignier might not probably have put much faith in this manuscript,
had it not been supported by a proof which he considered of great
weight. As he was very popular among the best families of Lorraine,
he frequently visited them, and being one day at dinner with M. des
Armoises, member of an old and illustrious race, the conversation
fell on the genealogy of this nobleman, who told the learned father
that among the family archives he would find much information
regarding his ancestors. Dinner was therefore no sooner ended than
the keys of the chamber containing these musty papers were given
to Vignier, and he spent the remainder of the day in looking over
numerous old manuscripts and parchments. At length he fell upon a
contract of marriage between one Robert des Armoises, chevalier,
with Jeanne d’Arcy, the so called Maid of Orleans. I leave the reader
to imagine the surprise of father Vignier at this unexpected
confirmation of the manuscript register.
This historical novelty excited a great sensation at the time, as may
easily be supposed. The above extract was inserted in the before
mentioned chronicle, and Dom Calmet placed it among the printed
documents in his History of Lorraine.
The circumstance had been nearly forgotten, when, towards the year
1740, a member of the literary society of Orleans, while making
some researches among the archives in the town-hall, found a bill of
Jacques l’Argentier, in which in the years 1435 and 1436 there is
mention of a sum of eleven panes eight cents for refreshments
supplied to the messenger who had brought letters from the maid of
Orleans; and another sum of twelve livres, given by the magistrates
on the 21st August 1436 to John du Lis, brother to the maid of
Orleans, to help him to pay his journey back to his sister. He had an
audience of the king, who had granted him a donation of one
hundred francs.
Here is a third extract, even more remarkable than the former: “Au
Sieur du Lis, le 18 Octobre 1436, pour un voyage qu’il fit en la dite
ville, en route vers la Pucelle, qui se trouvant alors à Arlon, au
Luxembourg, et pour port de letters de Jeanne la Pucelle, pour le
Roi, à Loicher, où il résidait alors, six livres parisis.”
And again: “A. Renard Brune, le 25 Juillet 1435, au soir, pour faire
loire un messager qui apportait lettres de Jeanne la Pucelle et allait
devers Guillaume Belier, Bailly de Troyes, II. s. 83. Parisis.”
The reader must remember that immediately after the execution of
Jeanne d’Arc, there was a common rumour that she was not dead,
and that another victim had been substituted for her. In the Histoire
de Lorraine by Dom Calmet, which only extends to 1544, we read,
speaking of the siege of Compiègne, that the Maid of Orleans
escaped in the crowd, and that no one knew what became of her.
Some supposed her to have been captured and carried to Rouen
and burnt, others affirm that the army was averse to her death.
The chronicle of Metz is still more explicit. After relating the capture
of Jeanne d’Arc, her removal to Rouen, and her death at the stake,
the author adds: “It was so asserted, but since that time a contrary
opinion has been held.”
Pasquier, in his researches on France, declares, that during four
whole years he had in his keeping the original trial of the maid of
Orleans with all the attendant circumstances, and he introduced the
subject into chapter V. book VI. of his history. His opinion then should
be treated with consideration. He observes that the inexplicable
delay between the condemnation and execution, and still more the
extraordinary precautions that were taken to hide the victim from the
eyes of the public, are very remarkable. When she was led to the
stake, a large mitre was placed on her head, which concealed the
greater part of her face, and a huge frame, covered with insulting
phrases, was carried before her, and completely concealed her
person.
In 1440, the people so firmly believed that Jeanne d’Arc was still
alive, and that another had been sacrificed in her place, that an
adventuress who endeavoured to pass herself off as the Maid of
Orleans was ordered by the government to be exposed before the
public on the marble stone of the palace hall, in order to prove that
she was an impostor. Why were not such measures taken against
the real Maid of Orleans, who is mentioned in so many public
documents, and who took no pains to hide herself?
The king of France not only ennobled Jeanne d’Arc, her father,
brothers, and their descendants male and female, by letters patent
dated 1429, but moreover wished that her brothers should take the
surname of de Lys, and in fact we find this name in the registers
already quoted.
A very remarkable extract given by Pasquier is drawn from the
accounts of the auditor of the Orleans estate, in the year 1444
(observe the date). An island on the river Loire is restored to a
brother of the Maid of Orleans, Pierre de Lys, chevalier: “Quie la
supplication de Messire Pierre, contenant que pour acquitter la
loyauté envers le Roi notre seigneur et Monsieur le Duc d’Orléans, il
se partit de son pays pour venir au service du Roi et de Monsieur le
Duc, en la compagnie de Jeanne la Pucelle sa seur, avec la quelle,
jusques à son absentement et depuis jusques à présent, il a exposé
son corps et ses biens au dit service et au fait des guerres du Roi,
tant à la résistance des anciens ennemis du Royaume qui tinrent le
siège devant la ville d’Orléans, comme en plusieurs voyages faits et
entrepris pour le Roi, &c.”
It is scarcely necessary to observe here how very much stronger the
claims of this brother would have been, if in 1444, instead of saying
“jusques à son absentement,” he had brought forward the martyrdom
of this sister, as having been the means of saving France from the
yoke of England. The expression son absentement may, easily be
explained when we remember that the Duke of Bedford, regent of
France, died in 1435, and that most probably Jeanne d’Arc was
released from prison after this event. It was only one year later that
she married Robert des Armoises.
But we may be told that Pope Calixtus III. appointed in 1455 a
commission to inquire into the justice or injustice of the
condemnation of the maid of Orleans, and that more than a hundred
witnesses were heard during this examination without the question of
the reality of her execution being once raised. Father Vignier has
met this objection by observing that the committee of enquiry was
desired to examine exclusively whether the judges had been justified
in condemning her as a heretic and an apostate, and it was on this
point only that the inquiry touched.
The commission was by no means ignorant of the received opinion
that Jeanne d’Arc still lived, but they were bound to keep to the letter
of the instructions received.
Jules Quicherat has collected almost every item bearing upon the
doubt of the fate of Jeanne d’Arc, in the fifth volume of his work:
Procès de condamnation et de réhabilitation de Jeanne d’Arc (in 8ᵛᵒ.
Paris 1849). 1) He gives the entire extract from the chronicle of Metz.
2) The extract from the audited accounts of the city of Orleans for the
year 1436, according to the register preserved in the Orleans library.
3) An extract from the contract of sale of the fourth part of the
lordship of Haraucourt by Robert des Armoises and Jeanne du Lys,
called la Pucelle, his wife. 4) Other extracts from the accounts kept
by the city of Orleans and the city of Tours for presents of wine made
to the Pucelle, and expense of postage of letters from the Bailly of
Tournay to the king, touching the matter of Dame Jeanne des
Armoises.
Quicherat does not admit that this Jeanne was the true Pucelle, but
those who read all his authorities will still retain strong doubts on the
subject.
In the 4th volume of the same work we find the account of the
execution of Jeanne according to the chronicle of Perceval de
Cagny, whom M. Quicherat considers to be the most complete, the
best informed, and the most honest of all the historians of “la
Pucelle.”
This Perceval was in the service of the Duc d’Alençon who had
constant intercourse with the maid of Orleans and had the best
opportunities of observing and knowing her. It was in 1436 that
Perceval occupied himself in committing the facts to writing, only five
years after the execution at Rouen. Now he asserts that the victim’s
face was covered when walking to the stake, while at the same time
a spot had been chosen for the execution, that permitted the
populace to have a good view. Why this contradiction? A place is
chosen to enable the people to see everything, but the victim[32] is
carefully hidden from their sight. Does it not seem as if this was
arranged with a sinister intention?
The following words are from the chronicle: “Les gens de la justice
du Roi d’Angleterre et la dite ville de Rouen firent appareiller lieu
convenable pour exécuter la justice, qui peult être vu de très grand
peuple. Et le dit 24ⁱᵉᵐᵉ jour de May environ l’eure de midy, la pucelle
fut amenée du Chastel, le visage embronché (recouvert) au dit lieu
ou le feu estoit prest; et après autres choses lues en la ditte place,
elle fut liée à l’estache et arse, par le rapport de ceux, qui disent ce
avoir vu.”
THE MURDER OF THE COUNTESS
OF CHATEAUBRIAND.
a. d. 1525.