You are on page 1of 2

BRO. CHRISTIAN C. PAGAYANAN SIR.

MAX FILICILDA
THE BROTHERS OF CHRIST October 14, 2022

THE QUESTIONS:
1. Which theory of knowledge is for you more plausible than the others? Why? What
characteristic of this theory provided grounds for certitude?
ANSWER
For me the most and very Plausible is the Tripartite theory of Knowledge,
because many great philosophers are still using this theory of knowledge as a model,
the meaning of this is that we as human we possesses great knowledge. We know
everything, we know ourselves, we know God we know all things that surrounds us
every day.why? We know this things it is because of Justification. The characteristic
of this theory that will provide a grounds for the certitude is justified true belief.
Why? Because this theory says that if we believe something with the using of
justification and if we discover that it is true, then we know it so this is the
characteristic of this theory that can provide grounds for certitude, Justified true
belief.

2. Why is Kant’s theory of knowledge a form of Critique? What does


this theory criticize?
ANSWER
Kant’s theory of knowledge is a form of critique because the perspective provided by
Kant's theory of knowledge would lead to confusion between the two opposing
schools of thinking, rationalism and empirism. According to rationalism, reason is the
only faculty or tool that can be utilized to ascertain the truth. Empiricism, on the other
hand. the use of sense perception alone to ascertain the reality of things. To
understand the essence of an item, which Kant claimed was unknowable, one cannot
rely solely on reason, according to Kant. It is unknowable because mental categories,
which are important components in determining an object's knowability, cannot
subject the essence of an object. Empiricism was also rejected by Kant since using the
senses to judge reality is not the only factor. The need for knowledge

3. What do you think are the dangers posed by Humean epistemology? Are these
dangers warranted?
BRO. CHRISTIAN C. PAGAYANAN SIR. MAX FILICILDA
THE BROTHERS OF CHRIST October 14, 2022

ANSWER
All that is argued in Hume's Epistemology. Sense experience is the source of
knowledge. Any conceptions of things are merely the sense impressions of the person
experiencing them.This is a philosophical. Since Hume's technique is strongly
connected and hence relative, it presents risks. Subjective because how the subject
experiences something affects their sensory impressions. An object may arouse
various sense impressions since there are various subjects. the many topics.This risk
of subjective and relative truth that could arise from applying Hume's epistemology
would be justified by experience.

4. How does Heidegger’s concept of dasein become the foundation


of his epistemology? What is dasein?

ANSWER
According to Heidegger, the term "Dasein" alludes to the existence of the being,
which is defined as being "in the world," "in time," "with others," and "towards
death."All knowledge must be restricted to the idea of dasein from an epistemological
standpoint. This implies that knowledge should be subjected to or measured by time
and is only valid for what is present in the world. Knowledge should also contribute to
realizing one's essence and advancing dasein existence.Heidegger's epistemology does
not apply to knowledge of things like God or supernatural beings that exist outside of
this world and the confines of time.

You might also like