You are on page 1of 75

Southville International School and Colleges

Institutional Research Office


SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

September 29, 2023


Juli-Ann A. Balmonte, MAP, MAN, RN
Faculty, College of Psychology
Southville International School and Colleges

Dear Ms. Balmonte,

Greetings!
I am Clobelle Marie A. Siachua, undergraduate student of the Bachelor of Science in Psychology
program of Southville International School and Colleges. I am currently writing a thesis entitled:
“COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS”.

My research aims to answer the following problems:


1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:
a) Demographics: Age, Civil status, and Type of Firefighter
b) Variables: Compassion Fatigue and Well-being
2. What is the relationship of compassion fatigue with well-being of the respondents?
3. Is there a significant difference on the relationship between compassion and the well-being
of the respondents when grouped according to:
a) Age
b) Civil status
c) Type of Firefighter

I would like to ask for your permission to validate the following instruments which I intend to use in
my study.

(a) Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST) by Dr. Charles Figley.


(b) Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment (PERMA-
profiler) by Julie Butler and Dr. Margaret Kern.

Attached herewith are the rubrics for face and content validation and the notes from the authors
on the use of the scales.

The assistance you will provide will surely contribute to the successful completion of this research.
Thank you very much for your usual support.

Respectfully yours, Noted by:

Clobelle Marie A. Siachua Miss Diana S. Imperio


Researcher Thesis Adviser

September 29, 2023


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Avelina L. Mandin, RGC, MAP


Faculty, College of Psychology
Southville International School and Colleges

Dear Ms. Mandin,

Greetings!
I am Clobelle Marie A. Siachua, undergraduate student of the Bachelor of Science in Psychology
program of Southville International School and Colleges. I am currently writing a thesis entitled:
“COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS”.

My research aims to answer the following problems:


1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:
a) Demographics: Age, Civil status, and Type of Firefighter
b) Variables: Compassion Fatigue and Well-being
2. What is the relationship of compassion fatigue with well-being of the respondents?
3. Is there a significant difference on the relationship between compassion and the well-being
of the respondents when grouped according to:
a) Age
b) Civil status
c) Type of Firefighter

I would like to ask for your permission to validate the following instruments which I intend to use in
my study.

(a) Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST) by Dr. Charles Figley.


(b) Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment (PERMA-
profiler) by Julie Butler and Dr. Margaret Kern.

Attached herewith are the rubrics for face and content validation and the notes from the authors
on the use of the scales.

The assistance you will provide will surely contribute to the successful completion of this research.
Thank you very much for your usual support.

Respectfully yours, Noted by:

Clobelle Marie A. Siachua Miss Diana S. Imperio


Researcher Thesis Adviser

September 29, 2023


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Aire F. Yukdawan, MAP, RPm


Faculty, College of Psychology
Southville International School and Colleges

Dear Ms. Aire,

Greetings!
I am Clobelle Marie A. Siachua, undergraduate student of the Bachelor of Science in Psychology
program of Southville International School and Colleges. I am currently writing a thesis entitled:
“COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS”.

My research aims to answer the following problems:


1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:
a) Demographics: Age, Civil status, and Type of Firefighter
b) Variables: Compassion Fatigue and Well-being
2. What is the relationship of compassion fatigue with well-being of the respondents?
3. Is there a significant difference on the relationship between compassion and the well-being
of the respondents when grouped according to:
a) Age
b) Civil status
c) Type of Firefighter

I would like to ask for your permission to validate the following instruments which I intend to use in
my study.

(a) Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST) by Dr. Charles Figley.


(b) Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment (PERMA-
profiler) by Julie Butler and Dr. Margaret Kern.

Attached herewith are the rubrics for face and content validation and the notes from the authors
on the use of the scales.

The assistance you will provide will surely contribute to the successful completion of this research.
Thank you very much for your usual support.

Respectfully yours, Noted by:

Clobelle Marie A. Siachua Miss Diana S. Imperio


Researcher Thesis Adviser

I. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE ORIGINAL PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS AS REFERENCE FOR


CONTENT VALIDATION

Name of the Original Instrument: Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Psychometric Properties Description


a. Objectives of the Instruments: The CFST measures the level of risk an individual might have to
developing compassion fatigue and is perhaps the most
universally applied measure due to its specific development for
the measurement of both direct and indirect trauma (Bride,
Radey & Figley, 2007; Marsay & Higson-Smith, 2005)
b. Internal Consistency: Cronbach’s alpha range coefficient of the instrument indicated a
high level of internal consistency, .86 to .94
c. Content Validity The CFST has a structured 66-items which are divided by two
sections; Items About You (1-45) and items about being a Helper
and Your Helping Environment (46-66).
d. Scoring Each item in the Compassion Fatigue Self-Test is rated on a 5-
point Likert scale. (0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = A Few Times, 3 =
Somewhat Often, 4 = Often, and 5 = Very Often)

Mark the items for scoring:


a. Put an x by the following 26 items: 1-3, 5, 9-11, 14, 19, 26-27,
30, 35, 37, 43, 46-47, 50, 52-55, 57, 59, 61, 66.
b. Put a check by the following 16 items: 17, 23-25, 41, 42, 45,
48, 49, 51, 56, 58, 60, 62-65.
c. Circle the following 23 items: 4, 6-8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20-22,
28, 29, 31-34, 36, 38-40, 44.
Add the numbers you wrote next to the items for each set of items
and note:
(a) Your potential for Compassion Satisfaction (x): 118 and
above=extremely high potential; 100-117=high potential; 82-
99=good potential; 64-81=modest potential; below 63=low
potential.
(b) Your risk for Burnout (check):36 or less=extremely low risk;
37-50=moderate risk; 51-75=high risk; 76-85=extremely high
risk.
(c) Your risk for Compassion Fatigue (circle): 26 or
less=extremely low risk, 27-30=low risk; 31-35=moderate risk;
36-40=high risk; 41 or more=extremely high risk.

II. PROPOSED CONTENT VALIDATION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR THE CURRENT
RESEARCH STUDY
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

DIRECTION: Please rate the appropriateness of the attached instrument, Compassion


Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST), for the thesis entitled “Compassion Fatigue and Well-being of
Selected Firefighters” by Clobelle Marie A. Siachua

CRITERIA YES NO COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS


1. The standardized tool is appropriate to be
used for the proposed research study.
2. The standardized tool is extensive in
context and can answer questions stated in
the research study.
3. The standardized tool can be easily
understood by the respondents of the research
study.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Juli-Ann A. Balmonte Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________

II. PROPOSED CONTENT VALIDATION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR THE CURRENT
RESEARCH STUDY
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

DIRECTION: Please rate the appropriateness of the attached instrument, Compassion


Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST), for the thesis entitled “Compassion Fatigue and Well-being of
Selected Firefighters” by Clobelle Marie A. Siachua

CRITERIA YES NO COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS


1. The standardized tool is appropriate to be
used for the proposed research study.
2. The standardized tool is extensive in
context and can answer questions stated in
the research study.
3. The standardized tool can be easily
understood by the respondents of the research
study.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Aire F. Yukdawan Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________

II. PROPOSED CONTENT VALIDATION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR THE CURRENT
RESEARCH STUDY
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

DIRECTION: Please rate the appropriateness of the attached instrument, Compassion


Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST), for the thesis entitled “Compassion Fatigue and Well-being of
Selected Firefighters” by Clobelle Marie A. Siachua

CRITERIA YES NO COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS


1. The standardized tool is appropriate to be
used for the proposed research study.
2. The standardized tool is extensive in
context and can answer questions stated in
the research study.
3. The standardized tool can be easily
understood by the respondents of the research
study.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Avelina L. Mandin Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________

TITLE OF THE RESEARCH: COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS


NAME OF INSTRUMENT: Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CSFT)
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

A. INTRODUCTION
INSTRUCTION YES NO COMMENTS
Consider each of the following characteristics
about you and your current situation last
week. Kindly choose the number that reflects
how frequently you experienced these
characteristics the previous week.
SCALE/ SCORING YES NO COMMENTS
1. Be certain you respond to all items.
a. Mark items for scoring:
- Circle the following 23 items: 4,6-8,
12, 13, 15,
16, 18, 20-22, 28, 29, 31-34, 36, 38-40, 44.
- Put a check by the following 16 items:
17, 23- 25, 41, 42, 45, 48, 49, 51, 56,
58, 60, 62-65.
- Put an x by the following 26 items: 1-
3, 5, 9-11,14, 19, 26-27, 30, 35, 37,
43, 4647, 50, 52-55, 57, 59, 61, 66.
3. Add the numbers you wrote next to the
items for each set of items and note:
a. Your potential for Compassion Satisfaction
(x) 118 and above=extremely high potential;
100- 117=high potential;82-99=good
potential; 64- 81=modest potential; below
63=low potential.
b. Your risk for Burnout (check): 36 or
less=extremely low risk; 37-50=moderate
risk; 51-75 high risk; 76-85=extremely high
risk. c. Your risk for Compassion Fatigue
(circle): 26 or less = extremely low risk, 27-
30 = low risk, 31-35=moderate risk; 36-40 =
high risk, 41 or more = extremely high risk.

B. CONTENT
EVALUATION
ITEM GOOD FALSE ITEM TO BE COMMENTS
ITEM ITEM IMPROVED
Items About You:
1. I am happy.
2. I find my life satisfying
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

3. I have beliefs that sustain


me
4. I feel estranged from others.
5. I find that I learn new things
from those I care for.
6. I force myself avoiding
certain activities or situations
because they remind me of a
frightening experience.
7. I find myself to avoid
certain thoughts or feelings
that remind me of a frightening
experience.
8.I have gaps in my memory
about frightening events.
9. I feel connected to others.
10. I feel calm.
11. I believe that I have a good
balance between my work and
my free time.
12. I have difficulty falling or
staying asleep.
13. I have outburst of anger or
irritability with little
provocation.
14. I am the person I always
wanted to be.
15. I startle easily.
16. While working with a
victim, I thought about
violence against the
perpetrator.
17. I am a sensitive person.
18. I have flashbacks
connected to those I help.
19. I have good peer support
when I need to work through a
highly stressful
experience.
20. I have had first hand
experience with traumatic
events in my adult life.
21. I have had first-hand
experience with traumatic
events in my childhood.
22. I think that I need to “work
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

through “a traumatic
experience in my life.
23. I think that I need more
close friends.
24. I think that there is no one
to talk with about highly
stressful experiences.
25. I have concluded that I
work too hard for my own
good.
26. Working with those I help
brings me a great deal of
satisfaction.
27. I feel invigorated after
working with those I help.
28. I am frightened of things a
person I helped has said or
done to me.
29. I experience troubling
dreams similar to those I help.
30. I have happy thoughts
about those I help and how I
could help them.
31. I have experienced
intrusive thoughts of times
with especially difficult
people I helped.
32. I have suddenly and
involuntarily recalled a
frightening experience while
working with a person I
helped.
33. I am pre-occupied with
more than one person I help.
34. I am losing sleep over a
person I help’s traumatic
experiences.
35. I have joyful feelings about
how I can help the victims I
work with.
36. I think that I might have
been “infected” by the
traumatic stress of those I
help.
37. I think that I might be
positively “inoculated” by the
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

traumatic stress of
those I help.
38. I remind myself to be less
concerned about the well-
being of those I help.
39. I have felt trapped by my
work as a helper.
40.I have a sense of
hopelessness associated with
working with those I help.
41. I have felt “on edge” about
various things and I attribute
this to working
with certain people I help.
42. I wish that I could avoid
working with some people I
help.
43. Some people I help are
particularly enjoyable to work
with.
44. I have been in danger
working with people I help.
45. I feel that some people I
help dislike me personally.
Items About Being a Helper
and Your Helping
Environment:
46. I like my work as a helper.
47. I feel like I have the tools
and resources that I need to do
my work as a
helper.
48. I have felt weak, tired, run
down as a result of my work as
a helper.
49. I have felt depressed as a
result of my work as a helper.
50. I have thoughts that I am a
“success” as a helper.
51. I am unsuccessful at
separating helping from
personal life.
52. I enjoy my co-workers.
53. I depend on my co-workers
to help me when I need it.
54. My co-workers can depend
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

on me for help when they need


it.
55. I trust my co-workers.
56. I feel little compassion
toward most of my co-
workers.
57.I am pleased with how I am
able to keep up with helping
technology.
58. I feel I am working more
for the money/prestige than for
personal fulfillment.
59. Although I have to do
paperwork that I don’t like, I
still have time to work
with those I help.
60. I find it difficult separating
my personal life from my
helper life.
61. I am pleased with how I
am able to keep up with
helping techniques and
protocols.
62. I have a sense of
worthlessness/disillusionment/
resentment associated with my
role as a helper.
63. I have thoughts that I am a
“failure” as a helper.
64. I have thoughts that I am
not succeeding at achieving
my life goals.
65. I have to deal with
bureaucratic, unimportant
tasks in my work as a helper.
66. I plan to be a helper for a
long time.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Avelina L. Mandin Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

TITLE OF THE RESEARCH: COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS


NAME OF INSTRUMENT: Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CSFT)

A. INTRODUCTION
INSTRUCTION YES NO COMMENTS
Consider each of the following characteristics
about you and your current situation last
week. Kindly choose the number that reflects
how frequently you experienced these
characteristics the previous week.
SCALE/ SCORING YES NO COMMENTS
1. Be certain you respond to all items.
a. Mark items for scoring:
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

- Circle the following 23 items: 4,6-8,


12, 13, 15,
16, 18, 20-22, 28, 29, 31-34, 36, 38-40, 44.
- Put a check by the following 16 items:
17, 23- 25, 41, 42, 45, 48, 49, 51, 56,
58, 60, 62-65.
- Put an x by the following 26 items: 1-
3, 5, 9-11,14, 19, 26-27, 30, 35, 37,
43, 4647, 50, 52-55, 57, 59, 61, 66.
4. Add the numbers you wrote next to the
items for each set of items and note:
a. Your potential for Compassion Satisfaction
(x) 118 and above=extremely high potential;
100- 117=high potential;82-99=good
potential; 64- 81=modest potential; below
63=low potential.
b. Your risk for Burnout (check): 36 or
less=extremely low risk; 37-50=moderate
risk; 51-75 high risk; 76-85=extremely high
risk. c. Your risk for Compassion Fatigue
(circle): 26 or less = extremely low risk, 27-
30 = low risk, 31-35=moderate risk; 36-40 =
high risk, 41 or more = extremely high risk.

B. CONTENT
EVALUATION
ITEM GOOD FALSE ITEM TO BE COMMENTS
ITEM ITEM IMPROVED
Items About You:
1. I am happy
2. I find my life satisfying
3. I have beliefs that sustain
me
4. I feel estranged from others.
5. I find that I learn new things
from those I care for.
6. I force myself avoiding
certain activities or situations
because they remind me of a
frightening experience.
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

7. I find myself to avoid


certain thoughts or feelings
that remind me of a frightening
experience.
8.I have gaps in my memory
about frightening events.
9. I feel connected to others.
10. I feel calm.
11. I believe that I have a good
balance between my work and
my free time.
12. I have difficulty falling or
staying asleep.
13. I have outburst of anger or
irritability with little
provocation.
14. I am the person I always
wanted to be.
15. I startle easily.
16. While working with a
victim, I thought about
violence against the
perpetrator.
17. I am a sensitive person.
18. I have flashbacks
connected to those I help.
19. I have good peer support
when I need to work through a
highly stressful
experience.
20. I have had first hand
experience with traumatic
events in my adult life.
21. I have had first-hand
experience with traumatic
events in my childhood.
22. I think that I need to “work
through “a traumatic
experience in my life.
23. I think that I need more
close friends.
24. I think that there is no one
to talk with about highly
stressful experiences.
25. I have concluded that I
work too hard for my own
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

good.
26. Working with those I help
brings me a great deal of
satisfaction.
27. I feel invigorated after
working with those I help.
28. I am frightened of things a
person I helped has said or
done to me.
29. I experience troubling
dreams similar to those I help.
30. I have happy thoughts
about those I help and how I
could help them.
31. I have experienced
intrusive thoughts of times
with especially difficult
people I helped.
32. I have suddenly and
involuntarily recalled a
frightening experience while
working with a person I
helped.
33. I am pre-occupied with
more than one person I help.
34. I am losing sleep over a
person I help’s traumatic
experiences.
35. I have joyful feelings about
how I can help the victims I
work with.
36. I think that I might have
been “infected” by the
traumatic stress of those I
help.
37. I think that I might be
positively “inoculated” by the
traumatic stress of
those I help.
38. I remind myself to be less
concerned about the well-
being of those I help.
39. I have felt trapped by my
work as a helper.
40.I have a sense of
hopelessness associated with
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

working with those I help.


41. I have felt “on edge” about
various things and I attribute
this to working
with certain people I help.
42. I wish that I could avoid
working with some people I
help.
43. Some people I help are
particularly enjoyable to work
with.
44. I have been in danger
working with people I help.
45. I feel that some people I
help dislike me personally.
Items About Being a Helper
and Your Helping
Environment:
46. I like my work as a helper.
47. I feel like I have the tools
and resources that I need to do
my work as a
helper.
48. I have felt weak, tired, run
down as a result of my work as
a helper.
49. I have felt depressed as a
result of my work as a helper.
50. I have thoughts that I am a
“success” as a helper.
51. I am unsuccessful at
separating helping from
personal life.
52. I enjoy my co-workers.
53. I depend on my co-workers
to help me when I need it.
54. My co-workers can depend
on me for help when they need
it.
55. I trust my co-workers.
56. I feel little compassion
toward most of my co-
workers.
57.I am pleased with how I am
able to keep up with helping
technology.
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

58. I feel I am working more


for the money/prestige than for
personal fulfillment.
59. Although I have to do
paperwork that I don’t like, I
still have time to work
with those I help.
60. I find it difficult separating
my personal life from my
helper life.
61. I am pleased with how I
am able to keep up with
helping techniques and
protocols.
62. I have a sense of
worthlessness/disillusionment/
resentment associated with my
role as a helper.
63. I have thoughts that I am a
“failure” as a helper.
64. I have thoughts that I am
not succeeding at achieving
my life goals.
65. I have to deal with
bureaucratic, unimportant
tasks in my work as a helper.
66. I plan to be a helper for a
long time.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Aire F. Yukdawan Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

TITLE OF THE RESEARCH: COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS


NAME OF INSTRUMENT: Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CSFT)

A. INTRODUCTION
INSTRUCTION YES NO COMMENTS
Consider each of the following characteristics
about you and your current situation last
week. Kindly choose the number that reflects
how frequently you experienced these
characteristics the previous week.
SCALE/ SCORING YES NO COMMENTS
1. Be certain you respond to all items.
a. Mark items for scoring:
- Circle the following 23 items: 4,6-8,
12, 13, 15,
16, 18, 20-22, 28, 29, 31-34, 36, 38-40, 44.
- Put a check by the following 16 items:
17, 23- 25, 41, 42, 45, 48, 49, 51, 56,
58, 60, 62-65.
- Put an x by the following 26 items: 1-
3, 5, 9-11,14, 19, 26-27, 30, 35, 37,
43, 4647, 50, 52-55, 57, 59, 61, 66.
5. Add the numbers you wrote next to the
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

items for each set of items and note:


a. Your potential for Compassion Satisfaction
(x) 118 and above=extremely high potential;
100- 117=high potential;82-99=good
potential; 64- 81=modest potential; below
63=low potential.
b. Your risk for Burnout (check): 36 or
less=extremely low risk; 37-50=moderate
risk; 51-75 high risk; 76-85=extremely high
risk. c. Your risk for Compassion Fatigue
(circle): 26 or less = extremely low risk, 27-
30 = low risk, 31-35=moderate risk; 36-40 =
high risk, 41 or more = extremely high risk.

B. CONTENT
EVALUATION
ITEM GOOD FALSE ITEM TO BE COMMENTS
ITEM ITEM IMPROVED
Items About You:
1. I am happy
2. I find my life satisfying
3. I have beliefs that sustain
me
4. I feel estranged from others.
5. I find that I learn new things
from those I care for.
6. I force myself avoiding
certain activities or situations
because they remind me of a
frightening experience.
7. I find myself to avoid
certain thoughts or feelings
that remind me of a frightening
experience.
8.I have gaps in my memory
about frightening events.
9. I feel connected to others.
10. I feel calm.
11. I believe that I have a good
balance between my work and
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

my free time.
12. I have difficulty falling or
staying asleep.
13. I have outburst of anger or
irritability with little
provocation.
14. I am the person I always
wanted to be.
15. I startle easily.
16. While working with a
victim, I thought about
violence against the
perpetrator.
17. I am a sensitive person.
18. I have flashbacks
connected to those I help.
19. I have good peer support
when I need to work through a
highly stressful
experience.
20. I have had firsthand
experience with traumatic
events in my adult life.
21. I have had first-hand
experience with traumatic
events in my childhood.
22. I think that I need to “work
through “a traumatic
experience in my life.
23. I think that I need more
close friends.
24. I think that there is no one
to talk with about highly
stressful experiences.
25. I have concluded that I
work too hard for my own
good.
26. Working with those I help
brings me a great deal of
satisfaction.
27. I feel invigorated after
working with those I help.
28. I am frightened of things a
person I helped has said or
done to me.
29. I experience troubling
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

dreams similar to those I help.


30. I have happy thoughts
about those I help and how I
could help them.
31. I have experienced
intrusive thoughts of times
with especially difficult
people I helped.
32. I have suddenly and
involuntarily recalled a
frightening experience while
working with a person I
helped.
33. I am pre-occupied with
more than one person I help.
34. I am losing sleep over a
person I help’s traumatic
experiences.
35. I have joyful feelings about
how I can help the victims I
work with.
36. I think that I might have
been “infected” by the
traumatic stress of those I
help.
37. I think that I might be
positively “inoculated” by the
traumatic stress of
those I help.
38. I remind myself to be less
concerned about the well-
being of those I help.
39. I have felt trapped by my
work as a helper.
40.I have a sense of
hopelessness associated with
working with those I help.
41. I have felt “on edge” about
various things and I attribute
this to working
with certain people I help.
42. I wish that I could avoid
working with some people I
help.
43. Some people I help are
particularly enjoyable to work
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

with.
44. I have been in danger
working with people I help.
45. I feel that some people I
help dislike me personally.
Items About Being a Helper
and Your Helping
Environment:
46. I like my work as a helper.
47. I feel like I have the tools
and resources that I need to do
my work as a
helper.
48. I have felt weak, tired, run
down as a result of my work as
a helper.
49. I have felt depressed as a
result of my work as a helper.
50. I have thoughts that I am a
“success” as a helper.
51. I am unsuccessful at
separating helping from
personal life.
52. I enjoy my co-workers.
53. I depend on my co-workers
to help me when I need it.
54. My co-workers can depend
on me for help when they need
it.
55. I trust my co-workers.
56. I feel little compassion
toward most of my co-
workers.
57.I am pleased with how I am
able to keep up with helping
technology.
58. I feel I am working more
for the money/prestige than for
personal fulfillment.
59. Although I have to do
paperwork that I don’t like, I
still have time to work
with those I help.
60. I find it difficult separating
my personal life from my
helper life.
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

61. I am pleased with how I


am able to keep up with
helping techniques and
protocols.
62. I have a sense of
worthlessness/disillusionment/
resentment associated with my
role as a helper.
63. I have thoughts that I am a
“failure” as a helper.
64. I have thoughts that I am
not succeeding at achieving
my life goals.
65. I have to deal with
bureaucratic, unimportant
tasks in my work as a helper.
66. I plan to be a helper for a
long time.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Juli-Ann A. Balmonte Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

I. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE ORIGINAL PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS AS REFERENCE FOR


CONTENT VALIDATION

Name of the Original Instrument: Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishments
(PERMA-Profiler)

Psychometric Properties Description


a. Objectives of the Instruments: The PERMA-profiler measures the five pillars of well-being
defined by Seligman (2011) in his book Flourish: positive
emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and
accomplishment. It also measures negative emotions and health.
b. Internal Consistency: Cronbach's alpha coefficient of PERMA-Profiler indicated a high
level of internal consistency .93 (Mahamid et. al 2023)
c. Content Validity The measure consists of 23-items. The health, negative emotion,
loneliness, and overall happiness questions act as filler questions
and provide more information; for briefness, the 15-PERMA
questions (3 per PERMA domain) could be used, but we
recommend using the full measure.
d. Scoring PERMA-profiler is categorized into the following functions; Very
high functioning = 9 and above, High functioning = 8-8.9,
Normal functioning = 6.5 to 7.9, and Sub-optimal functioning = 5
to 6.4. All questions are scored on an 11-point scale ranging from
0 ("never," "terrible," and "not at all") to 10 ("always,"
"excellent," and "completely") depending on the question. Scores
are calculated as the average of the items comprising each factor.
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

II. PROPOSED CONTENT VALIDATION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR THE CURRENT
RESEARCH STUDY

DIRECTION: Please rate the appropriateness of the attached instrument, Compassion


Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST), for the thesis entitled “Compassion Fatigue and Well-being of
Selected Firefighters” by Clobelle Marie A. Siachua

CRITERIA YES NO COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS


1. The standardized tool is appropriate to be
used for the proposed research study.
2. The standardized tool is extensive in
context and can answer questions stated in
the research study.
3. The standardized tool can be easily
understood by the respondents of the research
study.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Juli-Ann A. Balmonte Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

I. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE ORIGINAL PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS AS REFERENCE FOR


CONTENT VALIDATION

Name of the Original Instrument: Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishments
(PERMA-Profiler)

Psychometric Properties Description


a. Objectives of the Instruments: The PERMA-profiler measures the five pillars of well-being
defined by Seligman (2011) in his book Flourish: positive
emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and
accomplishment. It also measures negative emotions and health.
b. Internal Consistency: Cronbach's alpha coefficient of PERMA-Profiler indicated a high
level of internal consistency .93 (Mahamid et. al 2023)
c. Content Validity The measure consists of 23-items. The health, negative emotion,
loneliness, and overall happiness questions act as filler questions
and provide more information; for briefness, the 15-PERMA
questions (3 per PERMA domain) could be used, but we
recommend using the full measure.
d. Scoring PERMA-profiler is categorized into the following functions; Very
high functioning = 9 and above, High functioning = 8-8.9,
Normal functioning = 6.5 to 7.9, and Sub-optimal functioning = 5
to 6.4. All questions are scored on an 11-point scale ranging from
0 ("never," "terrible," and "not at all") to 10 ("always,"
"excellent," and "completely") depending on the question. Scores
are calculated as the average of the items comprising each factor.
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

II. PROPOSED CONTENT VALIDATION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR THE CURRENT
RESEARCH STUDY

DIRECTION: Please rate the appropriateness of the attached instrument, Compassion


Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST), for the thesis entitled “Compassion Fatigue and Well-being of
Selected Firefighters” by Clobelle Marie A. Siachua

CRITERIA YES NO COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS


1. The standardized tool is appropriate to be
used for the proposed research study.
2. The standardized tool is extensive in
context and can answer questions stated in
the research study.
3. The standardized tool can be easily
understood by the respondents of the research
study.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Aire F. Yukdawan Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

I. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE ORIGINAL PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS AS REFERENCE FOR


CONTENT VALIDATION

Name of the Original Instrument: Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishments
(PERMA-Profiler)

Psychometric Properties Description


a. Objectives of the Instruments: The PERMA-profiler measures the five pillars of well-being
defined by Seligman (2011) in his book Flourish: positive
emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and
accomplishment. It also measures negative emotions and health.
b. Internal Consistency: Cronbach's alpha coefficient of PERMA-Profiler indicated a high
level of internal consistency .93 (Mahamid et. al 2023)
c. Content Validity The measure consists of 23-items. The health, negative emotion,
loneliness, and overall happiness questions act as filler questions
and provide more information; for briefness, the 15-PERMA
questions (3 per PERMA domain) could be used, but we
recommend using the full measure.
d. Scoring PERMA-profiler is categorized into the following functions; Very
high functioning = 9 and above, High functioning = 8-8.9,
Normal functioning = 6.5 to 7.9, and Sub-optimal functioning = 5
to 6.4. All questions are scored on an 11-point scale ranging from
0 ("never," "terrible," and "not at all") to 10 ("always,"
"excellent," and "completely") depending on the question. Scores
are calculated as the average of the items comprising each factor.
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

II. PROPOSED CONTENT VALIDATION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR THE CURRENT
RESEARCH STUDY

DIRECTION: Please rate the appropriateness of the attached instrument, Compassion


Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST), for the thesis entitled “Compassion Fatigue and Well-being of
Selected Firefighters” by Clobelle Marie A. Siachua

CRITERIA YES NO COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS


1. The standardized tool is appropriate to be
used for the proposed research study.
2. The standardized tool is extensive in
context and can answer questions stated in
the research study.
3. The standardized tool can be easily
understood by the respondents of the research
study.

Other Comments and Suggestions:


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Avelina L. Mandin Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

TITLE OF THE RESEARCH: COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS

NAME OF INSTRUMENT: Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and


Accomplishments (PERMA-Profiler)

A. INTRODUCTION
INSTRUCTION YES NO COMMENTS
Before you begin, please read these
instructions carefully:

Each question includes a set of circular


buttons next to a range of response choices.
To share your response, click the circular
button that best matches your feelings and
experiences in the past week. You'll find five
options for each statement.
SCALE/ SCORING YES NO COMMENTS
Scores are calculated as the average of the
items comprising each factor:
Positive Emotion: P = mean(P1,P2,P3)
Engagement: E = mean(E1,E2,E3)
Relationships: R = mean(R1,R2,R3)
Meaning M = mean(M1,M2,M3)
Accomplishment A = mean(A1,A2,A3)
Overall Well-being PERMA= mean
(P1,P2,P3,E1,E2,E3, R1,R2,R3, M1,M2,M3,
A1,A2,A3,hap)
Negative Emotion: N = mean(N1,N2,N3)
Health = H = mean(H1,H2,H3)
Loneliness Lon (single item)

1. Be certain you respond to all items.


a. Mark items for scoring:
- Circle the following 23 items: 4,6-8,
12, 13, 15,
16, 18, 20-22, 28, 29, 31-34, 36, 38-40, 44.
- Put a check by the following 16 items:
17, 23- 25, 41, 42, 45, 48, 49, 51, 56,
58, 60, 62-65.
- Put an x by the following 26 items: 1-
3, 5, 9-11,14, 19, 26-27, 30, 35, 37,
43, 4647, 50, 52-55, 57, 59, 61, 66.
6. Add the numbers you wrote next to the
items for each set of items and note:
a. Your potential for Compassion Satisfaction
(x) 118 and above=extremely high potential;
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

100- 117=high potential;82-99=good


potential; 64- 81=modest potential; below
63=low potential.
b. Your risk for Burnout (check): 36 or
less=extremely low risk; 37-50=moderate
risk; 51-75 high risk; 76-85=extremely high
risk. c. Your risk for Compassion Fatigue
(circle): 26 or less = extremely low risk, 27-
30 = low risk, 31-35=moderate risk; 36-40 =
high risk, 41 or more = extremely high risk.

B. CONTENT
EVALUATION
ITEM GOOD FALSE ITEM TO BE COMMENTS
ITEM ITEM IMPROVED
Positive Emotions (P1, P2,
P3)
In general, how often do you
feel joyful?
In general, how often do you
feel positive?
In general, to what extent do
you feel contented?
Engagement (E1, E2, E3)
How often do you become
absorbed in what you are
doing?
In general, to what extent do
you feel excited and interested
in things?
How often do you lose track of
time while doing something
you enjoy?
Relationships (R1, R2, R3)
To what extent do you receive
help and support from others
when you need it?
To what extent do you feel
loved?
How satisfied are you with
your personal relationships?
Meaning (M1, M2, M3)
In general, to what extent do
you lead a purposeful and
meaningful life?
In general, to what extent do
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

you feel that what you do in


your life is valuable
and worthwhile?
To what extent do you
generally feel you have a sense
of direction in your
life?
Accomplishment (A1, A2,
A3)
How much of the time do you
feel you are making progress
towards accomplishing your
goals?
How often do you achieve the
important goals you have set
for yourself?
How often are you able to
handle your responsibilities?
Negative Emotion (N1, N2,
N3)
In general, how often do you
feel anxious?
In general, how often do you
feel angry?
In general, how often do you
feel sad?
Health (H1, H2, H3)
In general, how would you say
your health is?
How satisfied are you with
your current physical health?
Compared to others of your
same age and sex, how is your
health?
Loneliness (Lon)
How lonely do you feel in
your daily life?

Other Comments and Suggestions:


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Juli-Ann A. Balmonte Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________

TITLE OF THE RESEARCH: COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

NAME OF INSTRUMENT: Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and


Accomplishments (PERMA-Profiler)

A. INTRODUCTION
INSTRUCTION YES NO COMMENTS
Before you begin, please read these
instructions carefully:

Each question includes a set of circular


buttons next to a range of response choices.
To share your response, click the circular
button that best matches your feelings and
experiences in the past week. You'll find five
options for each statement.
SCALE/ SCORING YES NO COMMENTS
Scores are calculated as the average of the
items comprising each factor:
Positive Emotion: P = mean(P1,P2,P3)
Engagement: E = mean(E1,E2,E3)
Relationships: R = mean(R1,R2,R3)
Meaning M = mean(M1,M2,M3)
Accomplishment A = mean(A1,A2,A3)
Overall Well-being PERMA= mean
(P1,P2,P3,E1,E2,E3, R1,R2,R3, M1,M2,M3,
A1,A2,A3,hap)
Negative Emotion: N = mean(N1,N2,N3)
Health = H = mean(H1,H2,H3)
Loneliness Lon (single item)

1. Be certain you respond to all items.


a. Mark items for scoring:
- Circle the following 23 items: 4,6-8,
12, 13, 15,
16, 18, 20-22, 28, 29, 31-34, 36, 38-40, 44.
- Put a check by the following 16 items:
17, 23- 25, 41, 42, 45, 48, 49, 51, 56,
58, 60, 62-65.
- Put an x by the following 26 items: 1-
3, 5, 9-11,14, 19, 26-27, 30, 35, 37,
43, 4647, 50, 52-55, 57, 59, 61, 66.
7. Add the numbers you wrote next to the
items for each set of items and note:
a. Your potential for Compassion Satisfaction
(x) 118 and above=extremely high potential;
100- 117=high potential;82-99=good
potential; 64- 81=modest potential; below
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

63=low potential.
b. Your risk for Burnout (check): 36 or
less=extremely low risk; 37-50=moderate
risk; 51-75 high risk; 76-85=extremely high
risk. c. Your risk for Compassion Fatigue
(circle): 26 or less = extremely low risk, 27-
30 = low risk, 31-35=moderate risk; 36-40 =
high risk, 41 or more = extremely high risk.

B. CONTENT
EVALUATION
ITEM GOOD FALSE ITEM TO BE COMMENTS
ITEM ITEM IMPROVED
Positive Emotions (P1, P2,
P3)
In general, how often do you
feel joyful?
In general, how often do you
feel positive?
In general, to what extent do
you feel contented?
Engagement (E1, E2, E3)
How often do you become
absorbed in what you are
doing?
In general, to what extent do
you feel excited and interested
in things?
How often do you lose track of
time while doing something
you enjoy?
Relationships (R1, R2, R3)
To what extent do you receive
help and support from others
when you need it?
To what extent do you feel
loved?
How satisfied are you with
your personal relationships?
Meaning (M1, M2, M3)
In general, to what extent do
you lead a purposeful and
meaningful life?
In general, to what extent do
you feel that what you do in
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

your life is valuable


and worthwhile?
To what extent do you
generally feel you have a sense
of direction in your
life?
Accomplishment (A1, A2,
A3)
How much of the time do you
feel you are making progress
towards accomplishing your
goals?
How often do you achieve the
important goals you have set
for yourself?
How often are you able to
handle your responsibilities?
Negative Emotion (N1, N2,
N3)
In general, how often do you
feel anxious?
In general, how often do you
feel angry?
In general, how often do you
feel sad?
Health (H1, H2, H3)
In general, how would you say
your health is?
How satisfied are you with
your current physical health?
Compared to others of your
same age and sex, how is your
health?
Loneliness (Lon)
How lonely do you feel in
your daily life?

Other Comments and Suggestions:


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Aire F. Yukdawan Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________

TITLE OF THE RESEARCH: COMPASSION FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING OF SELECTED FIREFIGHTERS


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

NAME OF INSTRUMENT: Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and


Accomplishments (PERMA-Profiler)

A. INTRODUCTION
INSTRUCTION YES NO COMMENTS
Before you begin, please read these
instructions carefully:

Each question includes a set of circular


buttons next to a range of response choices.
To share your response, click the circular
button that best matches your feelings and
experiences in the past week. You'll find five
options for each statement.
SCALE/ SCORING YES NO COMMENTS
Scores are calculated as the average of the
items comprising each factor:
Positive Emotion: P = mean(P1,P2,P3)
Engagement: E = mean(E1,E2,E3)
Relationships: R = mean(R1,R2,R3)
Meaning M = mean(M1,M2,M3)
Accomplishment A = mean(A1,A2,A3)
Overall Well-being PERMA= mean
(P1,P2,P3,E1,E2,E3, R1,R2,R3, M1,M2,M3,
A1,A2,A3,hap)
Negative Emotion: N = mean(N1,N2,N3)
Health = H = mean(H1,H2,H3)
Loneliness Lon (single item)

1. Be certain you respond to all items.


a. Mark items for scoring:
- Circle the following 23 items: 4,6-8,
12, 13, 15,
16, 18, 20-22, 28, 29, 31-34, 36, 38-40, 44.
- Put a check by the following 16 items:
17, 23- 25, 41, 42, 45, 48, 49, 51, 56,
58, 60, 62-65.
- Put an x by the following 26 items: 1-
3, 5, 9-11,14, 19, 26-27, 30, 35, 37,
43, 4647, 50, 52-55, 57, 59, 61, 66.
8. Add the numbers you wrote next to the
items for each set of items and note:
a. Your potential for Compassion Satisfaction
(x) 118 and above=extremely high potential;
100- 117=high potential;82-99=good
potential; 64- 81=modest potential; below
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

63=low potential.
b. Your risk for Burnout (check): 36 or
less=extremely low risk; 37-50=moderate
risk; 51-75 high risk; 76-85=extremely high
risk. c. Your risk for Compassion Fatigue
(circle): 26 or less = extremely low risk, 27-
30 = low risk, 31-35=moderate risk; 36-40 =
high risk, 41 or more = extremely high risk.

B. CONTENT
EVALUATION
ITEM GOOD FALSE ITEM TO BE COMMENTS
ITEM ITEM IMPROVED
Positive Emotions (P1, P2,
P3)
In general, how often do you
feel joyful?
In general, how often do you
feel positive?
In general, to what extent do
you feel contented?
Engagement (E1, E2, E3)
How often do you become
absorbed in what you are
doing?
In general, to what extent do
you feel excited and interested
in things?
How often do you lose track of
time while doing something
you enjoy?
Relationships (R1, R2, R3)
To what extent do you receive
help and support from others
when you need it?
To what extent do you feel
loved?
How satisfied are you with
your personal relationships?
Meaning (M1, M2, M3)
In general, to what extent do
you lead a purposeful and
meaningful life?
In general, to what extent do
you feel that what you do in
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

your life is valuable


and worthwhile?
To what extent do you
generally feel you have a sense
of direction in your
life?
Accomplishment (A1, A2,
A3)
How much of the time do you
feel you are making progress
towards accomplishing your
goals?
How often do you achieve the
important goals you have set
for yourself?
How often are you able to
handle your responsibilities?
Negative Emotion (N1, N2,
N3)
In general, how often do you
feel anxious?
In general, how often do you
feel angry?
In general, how often do you
feel sad?
Health (H1, H2, H3)
In general, how would you say
your health is?
How satisfied are you with
your current physical health?
Compared to others of your
same age and sex, how is your
health?
Loneliness (Lon)
How lonely do you feel in
your daily life?

Other Comments and Suggestions:


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

Name of the Validator: Ms. Avelina L. Mandin Signature: ___________________


Designation: Faculty, College of Psychology Date: _______________________

A. ORIGINAL TOOL
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

A.1 Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST)


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

A.2 Positive and Negative emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meanings, Accomplishments,


Health (PERMA-Profiler)
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

B. Email from the authors


B.1 CFST
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Reply from the author:


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

B.2 PERMA-Profiler
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Reply from the Author:

A. ORIGINAL TOOL
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

A.1 Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST)


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

A.2 Positive and Negative emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meanings, Accomplishments,


Health (PERMA-Profiler)
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

B. Email from the authors


B.1 CFST
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Reply from the author:


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

B.2 PERMA-Profiler
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Reply from the Author:

A. ORIGINAL TOOL
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

A.1 Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFST)


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

A.2 Positive and Negative emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meanings, Accomplishments,


Health (PERMA-Profiler)
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

B. Email from the authors


B.1 CFST
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Reply from the author:


Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

B.2 PERMA-Profiler
Southville International School and Colleges
Institutional Research Office
SISC/QSF-OIR-019 College Division
Rev. 003 06/13/23
Instrument Validation Certificate

Reply from the Author:

You might also like