Professional Documents
Culture Documents
vehicles
Introduction
Battery Modeling
To use any of the above-discussed algorithms or to verify
if your BMS is working as expected we need to develop a
mathematical model for our battery pack.
Contents
Introduction
Most people are aware of the dramatic and fast-paced trend towards electrification within the
automotive industry which has led to the increased use of Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries for energy
storage in electrified vehicles.
There are many ways to model a battery, but the two most commonly-used are electrical-equivalent
behavioral models and electrochemical physical models. Both methods provide value for engineers, and
each one takes a different approach to modeling the behavior of batteries. In this blog, you’ll learn
about the basic operation of Li-ion batteries, how these different approaches model the behavior of a
battery, and the benefits and tradeoffs associated with each.
For most applications using battery models, it is generally important to accurately predict the
electrical characteristics of the battery, including the voltage across it and the current flowing
through it. Additionally, an estimation of State of Charge (SOC, a normalized estimation of how
much chemical energy is stored in a cell) is required. If battery models are linked to thermal
management simulations, accurate heat dissipation from the battery must be captured.
As anyone with a cell phone, tablet, or laptop can tell you – Li-ion batteries degrade over time.
There are many electrochemical factors that lead to the degradation of a Li-ion battery. For
instance, the active materials in the cathode and anode tend to crack over time and there are
undesirable side reactions that lead to growth of films on active material particles in both the
cathode and anode. Additionally, under extreme conditions, Li+ may react with electrons to form
Lithium metal in the anode during a process referred to as Lithium plating, which can be very
detrimental to the health of a battery.
Safety simulation and testing is also an important topic. Abuse conditions such as nail
penetration, as well as extremely hot or cold environments could be catastrophic for the battery.
This is where predictive 3D models of cells and the conditions around them are required in order
to capture the electrothermal response of the battery.
Electrical-Equivalent Modeling
Now that we understand more about Li-ion batteries, let’s take a look at the different modeling
methods used, starting with electrical-equivalent modeling. This modeling method is done
primarily to give electrical representations of how batteries react under certain loading
conditions.
The simplest test done on a battery or cell is a constant-current discharge/charge test, where cells
are discharged and charged to and from 0% and 100% state of charge at a constant current.
During these tests, the terminal voltage of the battery is observed to be similar to Figure 2.
Figure 2 - Full Discharge/Charge Cycle
Similarly, these discharge/charge tests can be done at multiple currents. Figure 3 shows what a
typical Li-ion cell’s terminal voltage may be for constant-current discharge tests at multiple
currents.
The behavior observed here is that the voltage changes while the battery depletes depending on
the direction of the voltage and the current. Additionally, the terminal voltage drops with
increasing currents.
The resistive models are good representations of a battery’s electrical behavior observed in
steady-state conditions; however, if loads on a battery are more dynamic, the resistive model
may not follow observed behavior. For instance, when Li-ion batteries are loaded with pulses of
current, the voltage response can be very non-linear. Figure 5, below, shows how a typical Li-
ion cell reacts to a pulse of discharge current and a pulse of charge current.
Figure 5 -voltage response of cell to current pulsations
With this type of model, the step changes in the voltage captured are represented with the
internal ohmic resistance (R0) and the exponential decay of the voltage response is captured with
the RC branches.
In each of these electrical-equivalent models, there are a few ways to estimate SOC of a cell or
battery. The simplest and most common way is a process called “Coulomb Counting” where the
model counts the charge (integral of current over time) moving across the battery and very
simply adds or subtracts that charge from the initial charge of the battery.
With these electrical-equivalent models, heat generation of the battery is calculated by the
summation of the power losses across each resistor (I2R losses). Aging phenomena of Li-ion
cells are often characterized as capacity fade and resistance growth over time with non-physics
based empirical models.
Summary
It’s important to note that electrical-equivalent battery modeling is not inherently a physics-based
approach. Both the dynamic and non-dynamic approaches are electrical representations of how
the terminal voltage of a battery may react to different battery loads. The capacitors and resistors
are not meant to represent physical capacitances and resistances but the dynamics of the battery.
The circuit parameters are often characterized at multiple temperatures and states of charge by
matching experimental results. This means that electrical-equivalent models are not predictive
outside of calibrated temperature or SOC range.
Electrochemical Modeling
If this predictive capability outside of calibrated temperatures and states of charge, or if insight
into cell operation is desired, physics-based electrochemical models are available to model Li-
ion batteries. For Li-ion batteries, the widely accepted electrochemical modeling approach is
often referred to as the “Newman Pseudo 2D model,” named after John Newman, the creator of
this model.
In the Newman Pseudo 2D (P2D) model, illustrated below in Figure 7, the cathode, separator,
and anode are discretized in the thickness direction (horizontal direction in Figure 7) using a
finite control volume approach. Additionally, in each sub-volume of the cathode and anode,
there is a spherical representation of an active particle, each of which are discretized using the
finite control volume approach in the radial direction. This combination of horizontal and radial
discretization is where the term “Pseudo 2D” comes from. The governing equations for the
charge transfer and Li+ diffusion are all solved using this finite control volume approach in the
model.
In these electrochemical battery models, the concentration of Li+ in different parts of the cell is
solved, ultimately leading to a physics-based estimation of state of charge. These models are
also able to predict the heat generated from Li-ion batteries, including heat generated ohmic
losses, reaction losses, and entropic heating.
With electrochemical models, physics-based representations of aging mechanisms are used. For
instance, the SEI layer, cathodic film layer, and their growth over time can be modeled.
Additionally, Lithium plating and Li+ isolation due to active material cracking can also be
modeled.
Now that we have an understanding of how each method works, let’s compare the two to
understand the advantages and tradeoffs associated with each.
First up – electrical-equivalent models. With this method of modeling, it is very easy to build and
calibrate a battery model. There are standard curve-fitting methods to calibrate electrical-
equivalent battery models to match a voltage. Because these models have a simple calibration
process, they usually give good results for voltage, current, SOC, and heat rate.
I know that’s a lot of information, so some advantages of each modeling approach are
summarized in Figure 8.
Figure 5. Lithium-ion battery cell, module and pack Lithium-ion battery cell Lithium-ion battery module
Lithium-ion battery pack Source:(Hitachi Vehicle Energy, 2008; Magna, 2010)
Figure 8 - advantages of each modeling approach
As you can see, both modeling methods offer their own unique set of advantages and tradeoffs,
but it still may not be clear when electrical-equivalent models and electrochemical models
should be used.
For many system-level and thermal engineers, electrical-equivalent models are all that is
required because these models give accurate results for battery voltage, current, SOC, and heat
rates. However, depending on the questions that are trying to be answered with simulation,
electrical-equivalent models may not be sufficient.
Electrochemical models are often used in more advanced applications of battery modeling. For
instance, if a model needs to predict the aging of a Li-ion cell, physics-based aging models offer
a more flexible and predictive solution than the empirical aging models available in electrical-
equivalent models. Additionally, when designing a cell, choosing a charging strategy, or
studying battery behavior in extreme climates, electrical-equivalent models may not provide
enough insight into the behavior of the cell, which is often required for these applications.
Because both the electrical-equivalent and the electrochemical approaches to modeling Li-ion
batteries provide value to simulation engineers, Gamma Technologies offers accurate capabilities
for both methods. When electrical-equivalent models are required, engineers are able to use GT-
SUITE’s flexible solution for a resistive or Thevenin (flexible number of R-C branches) battery
model. When electrochemical models are required, AutoLion provides cell designers and system
simulation engineers accurate and fast-running electrochemical models. These two tools can
also be combined in order to incorporate electrochemical battery models into multi-domain
system-level models.
All-electric vehicles (EVs) run on electricity only. They are propelled by one or more electric
motors powered by rechargeable battery packs. EVs have several advantages over conventional
vehicles:
Energy efficient. EVs convert over 77% of the electrical energy from the grid to power at the
wheels. Conventional gasoline vehicles only convert about 12%–30% of the energy stored in
gasoline to power at the wheels.
Environmentally friendly. EVs emit no tailpipe pollutants, although the power plant producing
the electricity may emit them. Electricity from nuclear-, hydro-, solar-, or wind-powered plants
causes no air pollutants.
Performance benefits. Electric motors provide quiet, smooth operation and stronger
acceleration and require less maintenance than internal combustion engines (ICEs).
Reduced energy dependence. Electricity is a domestic energy source.
5000 2500
As the green movement increases in popularity,
Slide Global E more and more electric vehicles (EVs) of all kinds
1 Mobility —from electric scooters to cars to buses and
cargo trucks—will grace the roads. Power
designers will be challenged to provide systems
that can be adapted to a wide variety of different
types of batteries and vehicles with vastly diverse
performance requirements.
EVs have several advantages over
Benefits of EV conventional vehicles:
State-of-health (SoH)
The three main state-of-health indicators of a
battery are:
State-of-charge (SoC)
SoC reflects the battery charge level; a
reading battery user is most familiar with. The
SoC fuel gauge can create a false sense of
security as a good and faded battery show 100
percent when fully charged.
SoC is sometimes divided into:
External short
circuit: Deformation
of the battery cell
causes an external
short circuit.
Overcharging the
battery beyond the
maximum voltage
specified in the data
sheet, e.g. to
increase the range
of an electric car.
Depending on the
degree of
overcharging, the
battery may be
damaged
permanently and the
service life of the
battery decreases.