Bobby Betterton gave a journal club presentation that was evaluated on overall presentation, speaking ability, and slides. The presentation addressed a relevant scientific topic and provided sufficient background information with a logical flow. Figures were adequately interpreted and the presentation was concluded with a good summary. Bobby spoke at a good pace and clearly presented the purpose and points, answering questions professionally. The slides were of an appropriate length and amount of information for the presentation. The strengths commented on were an organized talk with a good summary on relevant signaling pathways.
Bobby Betterton gave a journal club presentation that was evaluated on overall presentation, speaking ability, and slides. The presentation addressed a relevant scientific topic and provided sufficient background information with a logical flow. Figures were adequately interpreted and the presentation was concluded with a good summary. Bobby spoke at a good pace and clearly presented the purpose and points, answering questions professionally. The slides were of an appropriate length and amount of information for the presentation. The strengths commented on were an organized talk with a good summary on relevant signaling pathways.
Bobby Betterton gave a journal club presentation that was evaluated on overall presentation, speaking ability, and slides. The presentation addressed a relevant scientific topic and provided sufficient background information with a logical flow. Figures were adequately interpreted and the presentation was concluded with a good summary. Bobby spoke at a good pace and clearly presented the purpose and points, answering questions professionally. The slides were of an appropriate length and amount of information for the presentation. The strengths commented on were an organized talk with a good summary on relevant signaling pathways.
OVERALL PRESENTATION 5 = Very good 3 = Average 1 = Poor 5 4 3 2 1 Presentation addressed a relevant question or topic in science. Sufficient background information provided
Logical flow of information
Figures adequately interpreted and explained
Points well-summarized in conclusion
Were Criteria Met? Circle appropriate score
SPEAKER 5 = Very good 3 = Average 1 = Poor 5 4 3 2 1
Good pace (not too fast or slow)
Purpose and points of talk clearly presented
Questions adequately answered
Professionalism (attire, demeanor, etc.)
Were Criteria Met? Circle appropriate score
SLIDES 5 = Very good 3 = Average 1 = Poor 5 4 3 2 1
Appropriate length of presentation
Appropriate amount of information on each slide
What were the strengths of the presentation?
Organized talk with good summary on relevant signaling pathways. Great job!
Comments on parts of the presentation that could be improved:
SAT Prep Plus: Unlocked Edition 2022 - 5 Full Length Practice Tests - Behind-the-scenes game-changing answer explanations to each question - Top level strategies, tips and tricks for each section