This document contains a score sheet for evaluating a final project, listing criteria such as knowledge of issues, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The criteria are rated on a scale from excellent to unsatisfactory, assessing elements like accuracy, use of details, insightful discussion questions, and strategic connections. Recommendations or comments are included at the bottom to provide additional feedback.
This document contains a score sheet for evaluating a final project, listing criteria such as knowledge of issues, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The criteria are rated on a scale from excellent to unsatisfactory, assessing elements like accuracy, use of details, insightful discussion questions, and strategic connections. Recommendations or comments are included at the bottom to provide additional feedback.
This document contains a score sheet for evaluating a final project, listing criteria such as knowledge of issues, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The criteria are rated on a scale from excellent to unsatisfactory, assessing elements like accuracy, use of details, insightful discussion questions, and strategic connections. Recommendations or comments are included at the bottom to provide additional feedback.
Criteria Rating (5) (4-3) (2) (1) Knowledge of issues is Issue is accurately Issues is explained with Issue needs to use more ILO-5 exceptionally accurate and is explained and uses many some accuracy but need accurate information’s and (5 Marks) explained clearly and effectively details ad various sources more details and more details or examples heavy during explained using details in presentation with some variety in sources and less reliance on notes during Application and little reliance on notes reliance on notes reliance on notes presentation Discussion questions are Discussion questions are Discussion questions are Weak discussion questions ILO-6 explained insightful. Presenters insightful. Presenters clear but need more that lacked any insight. make clear conclusions and make clear conclusions insightful. Presenter need Weak conclusions and (5 Marks) connections in feedback and and connections in to make clearer conclusions connections. Analysis answering questions. feedback and answering and connections question
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Criteria Rating (10-07) (07-05) (04-03) (02-01) Makes appropriate and powerful Demonstrate good Makes appropriate but Makes little or no connections between the issues command of the somewhat vague connections connection between the ILO-7 identified and the strategic strategic concepts and between the issues and issues identified and the (10 Marks) concepts studied and used all analytical tools concepts studies and uses some strategic concepts studied available tools of analysis to tools of analysis to diagnose the and little or no use of tools Synthesis diagnose the issues and problems issues and problems of analysis to diagnose the issue and problems Well-written, demonstrates Fairly organized and Presentation is somewhat Not well written and very ILO-8 clarity, conciseness and explained using some organized and includes some week connections. (10 Marks) presentation is exceptionally details, presentation is images Presentation needs to be detailed organized, logical and detailed and organized more organized and logical Evaluation includes clear images