You are on page 1of 4

Teachers Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: Enrollment No.:


Name of Student: Enrollment No.:
Name of Student: Enrollment No.:
Name of Student: Enrollment no:
Name of Student: Enrollment no:
Name of Student: Enrollment no:
Academic Year: 2022-23 Semester: I
Name of Programme:
Course Name: ICT
Course Coordinator: Mrs.
Course Code: 22001
S.S. Narale

Title of the Micro Project:

Major Learning Outcomes achieved by student by doing the Project:


a) Course Outcomes

1. Use computer system and its peripherals.


2. Prepare business document using word processing tool.
3. Interpret data and represent it using word processing tool.
4. Prepare professional presentation.
5. Use different types of web browsers.

b) Outcomes in Affective Domain


a. Follow safety practices.
b. Follow ethical practices.
c. Practice good housekeeping.
Report of work carried out:

Sr. Planned Completed Sign of


Details of activity
No. schedule Schedule Guide

1 Project Proposal
2 Data Collection & Analysis
3 Preparation of Program
4 Preparation of Report
5 Presentation & Submission

Evaluation as per Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project


√ (Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
Sr. Poor Average Good Excellent
No
Characteristic
(Marks 1-3) (Marks 4-5) (Marks 6-8) (Marks 9-10)
Relate to very Related to some Take care of at Take care of more
Relevance to few Los Los least one CO than one CO
1 the course
Not more than At least 5 At least 7 relevant About 10 relevant
Literature
two sources, relevant sources, sources, sources,
Survey/ Very old At least 2 latest Most latest Most latest
2 Information reference
collection
Small sample Sufficient & Sufficient & Enough data
size, appropriate appropriate sample, collected by
Data neither sample, Enough data sufficient &
organized nor Enough data collected which is appropriate sample
Data presented well collected but not organized size,
3 collection & organized & not &presentedwell but Proper Inferences
Analysis well presented, poor inferences drawn by organizing
Poor inferences drawn & presenting data
drawn through tables,
charts & graphs

Incomplete Just assembled Well assembled Well assembled with


assembly but parts are not with proper proper functioning
functioning well, functioning parts, parts,
Quality of Not in proper In proper shape but In proper shape and
4 Program/ shape no creativity in creativity in design
Model design & use of and use of material
material
Very short, Nearly sufficient Detailed, correct Very detailed
Poor quality and correct and clear correct, clear
sketches, details about description of description of
Details about methods, methods, materials, methods, materials,
methods, materials & precautions & precautions and
Report material, precautions & conclusions, conclusions,
5 Preparation precaution & conclusion, Sufficient graphic Enough tables,
conclusions But not enough description charts and sketches
omitted, clarity in
Some details are presentation
wrong (Table, chart)
Major Includes major Includes major Well organized,
information is information but information and includes major
not included, not well well organized but information, well
Information is organized and not well presented presented
not well presented
6 Presentation Organized

Could not reply Replied to Replied properly to Replied most of the


to considerable considerable no. considerable no. of questions properly
no. of question of questions but questions
not properly
Defense
7
Micro Project Evaluation:
Process Assessment Product Assessment
Part B
Part A Project Individual Total
Enrollment Project
Name of Student Project Report/ Presentation Marks
No. Methodology
Proposal Working / Viva (10)
(2)
(2) Model (4)
(2)

Comments/ Suggestions about team work/ leadership/ inter-personal communication


(If any)

Any other comment

Name & Designation of the Faculty: Mrs. S.S. Narale (Lecturer)

Signature:

You might also like