Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/333518902
CITATIONS READS
26 402
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohamed Taha on 23 April 2020.
To cite this article: Mohamed H. Taha, Samir A. Abdel Maksoud, Mohsen M. Ali, Ahmed M. A. El
Naggar, Asmaa S. Morshedy & Amir A. Elzoghby (2019) Conversion of biomass residual to acid-
modified bio-chars for efficient adsorption of organic pollutants from industrial phosphoric acid: an
experimental, kinetic and thermodynamic study, International Journal of Environmental Analytical
Chemistry, 99:12, 1211-1234, DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2019.1618459
Article views: 33
ARTICLE
1. Introduction
Natural organic matter (NOM) is a combination of anionic molecules with carboxylic and
phenolic surface functional groups, which are mainly produced from the decomposition
of animal residues and plants [1]. In other words, NOM is a mixture of organic materials
including fulvic acid, humic acid (HA), hydrophilic acid, protein, lipid, hydrocarbons and
amino acids. Humic substances (mainly humic and fulvic acids) are the main compounds
of NOM [2,3].
Organic compounds are naturally present in phosphate rocks coming from biological
sediments of sea organisms [4]. The organics are introduced into the phosphoric acid as
impurities from the phosphate ore during the phosphoric acid production using the wet
process. There are a few studies interested by the identification of OM present in
industrial phosphoric acid. Such organic compounds consist essentially of di-n-butyl
phthalate (C16H22O4), aromatics, humic compounds, fulvic acid and other oxidised
hydrocarbons, which are mostly saturated and unsaturated fatty acids from C8, to C30,
in addition to palmitic and oleic acids and some insoluble matters [5–8].
These organic compounds result in foam stabilisation in the digestion tank and above
the filters, affect crystallisation of gypsum and give dark coloured acids [9]. Accordingly,
the presence of these organic compounds affects the quantity and quality of the
produced phosphoric acid [10]. In addition, the presence of organic matter (OM) in
phosphoric acid is considered as a source of operating problems in the purification of
phosphoric acid using solvent extraction technique. Same difficulty is faced in the
uranium recovery from phosphoric acid by solvent extraction method, where the
extracted OM coagulated and accumulated in large quantities at the interfacial area
between organic solvent and wet phosphoric acid as ‘crude’. The crude formation leads
to solvent losses which affect significantly the process economy [11].
About 95% of wet phosphoric acid is utilised in fertiliser application. Therefore, the
dissolved organic matter (DOM) in phosphoric acid is considered a serious problem with
regard to environmental and human health concerns where DOM can bind or complex toxic
metals during the application of phosphoric acid as fertiliser. Accordingly, several efforts
have been done regarding the removal or reduction of OM of their potential risk to public
health [12,13]. Most of the adopted processes to achieve this task are mainly based on either
liquid-liquid extraction or adsorption on suitably chosen solid materials [5–10,14].
Activated carbon has been utilised efficiently to remove a broad spectrum of organic
compounds, for example aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, from water [15–17]. In
phosphoric acid purification processes, activated carbon have been extensively investi-
gated for OM adsorption and/or heavy metal ions [10,18,19]. Adsorption of OM using
powder activated carbon (PAC) is a slow process, and the adsorbed amount of OM is far
below the equilibrium adsorption capacity of PAC during a normal contact time [20].
Modification of carbon surfaces by physicochemical methods has been studied in order
to attain an in-situ efficient heavy metals removal. Therefore, the increasingly stringent
environmental regulations can be highly reached [21]. Carbon surface can be modified
to develop desirable physicochemical properties via adequate choice of activation
procedures. Surface properties of carbon structures, such as charcoal, can be modified
using inorganic acids [22]. This modification mainly affects the surface chemistry of the
carbons and sometimes alters their porosity and specific surface area [23]. The present
contribution aims to investigate OM sorption from commercial phosphoric acid onto
acid sites-modified charcoal through batch kinetics as well as equilibrium studies.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and reagents
HNO3 and HCl, chemical activating reagents, were supplied from ADWIC, Egypt. A granular
bio-charcoal (BC) was used as the base adsorbent. The BC was produced via an adiabatic
thermal conversion process of a type of solid waste namely; rice-straw. The conversion
process was carried out at 250°C for an operational time of 2 h [24,25]. Charcoal granules
were crushed into particles of 250–420 microns in size. The particles were then dried at 110°
C for 48 h in order to get them ready for the adsorption process. Another adsorbent was
parallel produced via treating a part of charcoal by HNO3. The treatment (leaching/oxida-
tion) step was achieved in a 500 mL Teflon flask. An amount of charcoal (30 g) and 200 mL
nitric acid (NAC) (6 M) were inserted into the bottle and were heated up at 70°C for 6 h. The
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1213
solid particles were filtered, washed several times by distilled water and were next dried at
110°C for 48 h [26]. Such treated sample was named NAC. In order to obtain hydrochloric
acid (HAC) activated charcoal, as another acid activated structure, a part of the blank BC
sample was then treated with 100 mL hydrofluoric acid (2 M) for 6 h at 70°C. The gained
particles were next filtrated, washed with distilled water many times then introduced for
drying for 48 h at 110°C. The finally obtained adsorbent was labelled as HAC [26].
Crude di-hydrate phosphoric acid, the utilised during this investigation, was supplied
from Abu Zaabal Company for Fertilizer and Chemical Materials (AZFC). The chemical
analysis of the stated crude phosphoric acid is presented in (Table 1).
2.2. Apparatus
The purification of phosphoric acid was investigated in a cylindrical reactor of 500 mL
capacity and 10 cm diameter. The reactor is placed in thermostatically controlled water
bath and fitted with Teflon-coated stirrer (its diameter is 2 cm). The impeller tip speed
was adjusted to 200 rpm. The filtration of adsorbents from the cleaned acid have been
achieved using vacuum pump, Buchner type filter (its diameter is 4.6 cm) as well as
polypropylene filter with 177 microns aperture size.
where Co and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of the OM (mg/L),
respectively, m is the utilised sorbent weight (g), and V is phosphoric acid volume (L).
OM sorption efficiency was calculated from the following equation:
Co Ce
Organic matter sorption % ¼ 100
Co
The distribution coefficient (Kd) of OM between phosphoric acid and sorbent has been
obtained from the following relation:
Co Ce V
Kd¼
Ce m
Figure 1. XRD pattern of the obtained carbon species at the optimum operating conditions of the
pyrolysis process.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum of the obtained carbon species at the optimum operating conditions of the
pyrolysis process and its sub-driven hydrochloric and nitric acid activated carbon.
in the feedstock is attributed to removal of the amorphous organic constituents during the
thermal process.
The structural properties of the BC as well as the acid activated carbon species have
been further illustrated through the presented FT-IR spectrum in Figure 2.
In the first region of absorption, a wide band with a reasonable intensity can be
noticed at 3600–3800 cm−1 [29]. This band peak is due to O–H stretching mode of both
the hydroxyl groups and adsorbed water which might exist in the given structure. In
addition, it must be indicated that the bands in the range of 3900–3650 cm−1 have also
been referred to the occurring hydrogen bonding between the OH groups [30].
For the second major absorption, the noted peak at 1640 cm−1 is indicative to the amides
that can be distinguished on the surface of the activated bio-carbons. The presence of such
1216 M. H. TAHA ET AL.
functional group could be obtained during the thermal conversion process owing to the
presence of primary amines that in the biomass based feedstock. The peak at approximately
1100 cm−1 belongs to the fingerprint of this carbon. This band can also be associated with
C–O symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration of –C–O–C– ring [31]. The third region
show peak at 628 cm−1 is assigned to the C–H bending mode. The region in between 700–
900 cm−1 contains various bands related to C–H bending with different degrees of substitu-
tion [32]. The bending region for the activated carbon might indicate that the existing
aliphatic C–H is mainly as – CH2–. This in turn can clarify that most of the aliphatic structures
in the bio-carbon are cyclic structures.
IR spectra of the activated charcoal by both HCl and HNO3 acids confirm the addition
of acidic groups in each case, in comparison to the given spectrum of blank bio-carbon.
In general, the presented FTIR spectra reflect the differences between the two presented
structures. The activation by the two acids showed additional bands than that of the
blank carbon. Furthermore, the intensity of the band at the same wavenumber is lower
in the case of the acidified carbon than that of the as-prepared carbon. This can be
attributed to the increase in the number of acid sites to the structure which could
subsequently enhance the potential hydrogen bonding along the surface of treated bio-
carbon. In addition, Indicative absorption bands for the HCl molecules could be noticed
at 460 and 770 cm−1. This in turn had resulted in a subsequent change in the chemical
functional groups at each activation stage which could probably affect their separation
activity towards the OMs, as clearly illustrated in Section 3.
The inner as well as the surface morphology of the as-prepared bio-carbon structure
is illustrated throughout the exhibited TEM micrographs and SEM images in Figures 3
and 4, respectively.
The TEM images show amorphous morphology of overlapped carbon sheets. In an
agreement with the XRD pattern, embedded crystalline structures on the carbon sheets
can be observed. The surface morphology, Figure 4, has been in a match with the
acquired morphology in the TEM micrographs.
Particularly, non-smooth way surface has been detected for the surface of the
produced BC. Well-organised parallel micro-channels can be observed along the whole
structure of displayed surface. Moreover, moderate porous structure can be noticed
through the shown channels. This may obviously refer to the expected high adsorption
by the presented bio-carbon structure.
On the other hand, the texture properties of the acid treated carbons have been
discussed via both the surface area values and the given SEM images in Figure 5. For
the blank bio-carbon, the specific surface area value was found to be 900 m2/g while an
explicit reduction in the values of surface area could be noted after adding the acid sites.
Numerically, the surface area values were, respectively, reduced to reach 750 and 580 m2/
g for the case of attaching HCl and HNO3 to the bio-char. This can be attributed to the
coverage of a part of the carbon surface as well as the filling of its pores by the molecules
of both acids [33]. The detected decrease in the surface properties in the acid treated
carbon had been further confirmed via the exhibited SEM images in Figure 5.
It can be clearly seen that the addition of both HCl and HNO3 molecules to the carbon
structure had resulted in the increase of surface roughness in both cases. However,
stronger level of roughness can be noticed in the case of loading NAC in comparison to
that of HAC loading. In addition, the level of porosity has been much lower in the case of
nitric than in the other case. This can be referred to the high-potential accumulation of the
NAC molecules due to their strong physical interaction together as a result of its increased
number of electrostatic charge. The tetragonal molecules geometry of NAC may be
another reason for the surface roughness of the NAC structure.
Figure 5. SEM for (I) hydrochloric acid-activated charcoal and (II) nitric acid activated charcoal.
Figure 6. Impact of stirring time on organic matter adsorption percent, % (1.0 g BC, HAC, and NAC/
100 mL of 23.5% P2O5 crude phosphoric acid at 25 ± 1°C, and 200 rpm).
Figure 7. Effect of solid/liquid ratio on the organic matter adsorption % from 23.5% P2O5 crude
phosphoric acid using BC, HAC, and NAC at 25 ± 1°C and 200 rpm.
1220 M. H. TAHA ET AL.
neatly eliminate such structures. Therefore, the liquid/solid ratio has been fixed at 1.0 g/
100 mL for the forthcoming steps of this investigation.
Figure 8. Influence of stirring speed on organic matter ion adsorption percent, % (room tempera-
ture, reaction time 120 min; 1.0 g BC, HAC, and NAC/100 mL crude phosphoric acid, 23.5% P2O5).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1221
Figure 9. Impact of acid concentration on organic matter adsorption percent onto BC, HAC, and NAC; 1 g
carbon/100 mL commercial phosphoric acid; reaction time 120 min.; room temperature; 200 rpm).
had been formed over the active site of the adsorbent. Therefore, limited adsorption
capability can be attained by the carbonaceous adsorbents.
In the past decades, different mathematical models were proposed for describing the
sorption results. These models could be classified as adsorption reaction models and
adsorption diffusion models. Both types of models are used to describe the kinetic of
sorption process; though, they are quite different in nature [37]. In this regards,
Lagergreen first-order and pseudo-second-order rate equations (as an example for
adsorption reaction models), and Morris–Weber equation (as an example for adsorption
diffusion models) were applied to analyse the adsorption kinetics of OM adsorption from
industrial di-hydrate phosphoric acid onto BC, HAC, and NAC carbon at 25 ± 1°C.
Lagergreen first-order equation can be written as follows [38]:
00
dqt00 =00 dt00 ¼ kp1 ðqe qt Þ (1)
Figure 10. Influence of reaction temperature on organic matter adsorption percent (1.0 g BC, HAC,
and NAC/100 mL phosphoric acid, 23.5% P2O5; time 120 min; 200 rpm).
Figure 11. Lagergreen plots for organic matter sorption from di-hydrate crude phosphoric acid,
23.5% P2O5, onto BC, HAC, and NAC.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1223
where K2 is the rate constant of pseudo-second-order equation (g/mg. min)), and the
products K2qe2 is the initial sorption rate represented as h. For the boundary conditions
t = 0 to t = t and qt = 0 to qt = qt, the integrated form of Equation (3) can be written as
t 1 1
¼ þ ðtÞ (4)
qt k2 q2e qe
The initial adsorption rate, h (mol g−1 h−1), was calculated from Equation (5), while
Equation (6) was used to determine the half-equilibrium time, t1/2 (h) [40,41]:
h ¼ k2 q2e (5)
1
t1=2 ¼ (6)
k2 qe
The scatter plot of log (qe – qt) versus time (Figure 11) shows the result of the
correlation coefficient of OM adsorption in the pseudo-first-order kinetic model. The
correlation coefficients (R2) value, the overall rate constant K1, and the value of qecal for
BC, HAC, and NAC carbon have been tabulated in Table 2. The kinetic plot of t/qt versus
time for OM sorption onto C, HAC, and NAC are represented in Figure 12. The kinetic
parameters of this model are calculated from the slope and intercept of the linear plots
and are given in Table 2.
According to the analysis result as shown in Table 2, adsorption process of OM was
not followed pseudo-first-order kinetic model for the applied carbon sorbents (BC, HAC,
and NAC) where the R2 values are not high especially for BC and NAC carbons. In
addition, the theoretically calculated equilibrium sorption capacity, qecal, values for the
applied three carbons types are not in agreement with the experimental sorption
capacities qeexp values.
Figure 12. Pseudo-second-order plots for adsorption of organic matter from di-hydrate crude
phosphoric acid, 23.5% P2O5, using BC, HAC, and NAC.
Table 3. The experimental capacity of blank and acid activated bio-char compared with
the sorption capacity of some other sorbents for OM recovery from phosphoric acid.
Sorbent type Sorption capacity, (mg/g) Refs.
Low quartz kaolinite (Ball clay) 11.7 [1]
High quartz kaolinite (Kaolin clay) 5.7
Raw bentonite clay (RBC) 17.2 [15]
Raw grey clay (RGC) 15.0
Natural bentonite 24.0 [40]
Sulfuric acid-activated bentonite 27.7
Hydrochloric acid activated bentonite 17.3
Blank bio-char (BC) 33.6 Present work
Hydrochloric acid-activated bio-char (HAC) 53.7
Nitric acid-activated bio-char (NAC) 47.9
Figure 13. Morris–Weber illustration for OM adsorption from crude phosphoric acid, 23.5% P2O5,
using BC, HAC, and NAC.
According to Equation (7), the relation between q vs. t0.5 should give straight line (Figure 13).
kid and B constants were calculated from the slope and intercept, respectively, and pre-
sented in Table 4. Generally, Kid increases by increasing the initial adsorptive concentration
[45,46]. For kinetics controlled only by Intra-Particle Diffusion model, B should equal 0,
meaning that the linear relationship forced through the origin [47,48]. However, in most
studies, this relationship shows multiple mechanisms (Multilinearity relatioship) that control
the process and provides better fit when B > 0, meaning not pass through the origin [49–51].
1226 M. H. TAHA ET AL.
Each linear part is representing a controlling mechanism. In the first stage, instanta-
neous adsorption or external surface adsorption occurs. In the second stage, Intra-
Particle Diffusion model begins, and in the third stage, the sorption process approaches
equilibrium. The sorption process slows as surface coverage reaches saturation. Defining
the time period for each line segment, based on the kinetic data, is somewhat arbitrary,
so piecewise linear regression could help in this case [51].
The obtained results showed that the intraparticle diffusion had two regions for OM
adsorption onto granular and acid activated charcoal sorbents. The high adsorption rate
in the first region was attributed to the high concentration of metal ions in solution and
more sorption sites on the adsorbent surfaces. The second region, the adsorption rate
slow, was the rate-determining step. This is because most of the adsorption sites on the
adsorbent surfaces were occupied by OM [41]. Moreover, from Figure 8 it is clear that
the plots are not linear in the whole range of contact time for the applied three sorbents
(BC, HAC, and NAC); therefore, the intraparticle diffusion was not the only mechanism of
OM adsorption from di-hydrate phosphoric acid.
Figure 14. Relation between log Kd and 1/T for organic matter adsorption from di-hydrate phosphoric
acid using BC, HAC, and NAC.
Table 5. Thermodynamic parameters for OM sorption from commercial di-hydrate phosphoric acid
using BC, HAC, and NAC.
ΔG (kJ/mol) ΔH ΔS
25°C 30°C 40°C 50°C (kJ/mol) (J/mol K)
BC −14.95 ± 0.02 −15.37 ± 0.02 −16.10 ± 0.02 −16.91 ± 0.02 8.22 ± 0.04 33.90 ± 0.2
HAC −16.13 ± 0.04 −16.60 ± 0.04 −17.44 ± 0.04 −18.27 ± 0.04 9.20 ± 0.01 37.07 ± 0.3
HNC −15.85 ± 0.04 −16.45 ± 0.04 −17.22 ± 0.04 −18.04 ± 0.04 9.54 ± 0.03 37.24 ± 0.2
of the OM species in the tested sample. Hence, the sorption capacity for a commercial OM
enhanced by increasing Ca(II) concentration.
In the current research work, the increased adsorption capacity of OM due to
pulverisation might be in relevance to high Ca (II) concentration in the treated grade
of phosphoric acid. Accordingly, the occurrence of cations, specially multivalent cations
such as Ca(II), could result in increasing the adsorption capacity of OM in general and HA
particularly. In addition, the presence of high concentrations of different cations in the
phosphoric acid sample could potentially play an important role in adsorption of OM
species. Specifically, the penetration of these cations into the pores of the presented
carbonaceous adsorbents working sample producing aggregates could probably attract
the species of OM. These species might then enter the pores where the cations
aggregates had enhanced the accumulation of OM. This hypothesis could be continued
until the OM species could not diffuse further into pores of bio-char based adsorbent
once these pores are blocked.
The particulates of OM could have gathered by them in the vicinity of the adsorbents
outer surface. Based on this hypothesis, the maximum quantity of adsorbed OM species
should controlled by the adsorbent external surface area that exposed to the bulk solution,
as reported in 2010 by Ando and co-workers [54]. Unlike the latter statement by Ando et al.,
the current research work suggests a new approach in the mechanism of OM species
adsorption onto bio-char-based adsorbents. Particularly, the relationship between the
adsorption capacity of adsorbents and their surface area had shown different trend.
In this work, although the blank bio-char (BC) had higher surface area than both HAC
and NAC, it showed less adsorption capacity. This could be attributed to both the
capability of both HAC and NAC to attain hydrogen bonding during the process of
adsorbing the species of OM. However, the enhanced adsorption capacity of HAC over
the NAC structure could be likely referred to two reasons. The first one belongs to the
geometry of both HCL and HNO3 that were used as activators for the bio-char. The HCL
has linear geometry while the NAC has a tetrahedral one. Therefore, the ability of HCl to
perform a hydrogen bonding than the NAC since its particles could easily accumulate
over each other. The second reason behind the higher adsorption capacity of HAC than
that of NAC is the slightly less surface area of the latter structure than the other one.
The increased capability of both HAC and NAC to adsorb the OM species has been
further confirmed via the presented SEM images (Figure 15 I–II) of their spent adsorbent
after the process of OM adsorption. Furthermore, the ability of both structures; HAC and
NAC, to perform hydrogen bonding has been proved through the given IR spectra for
the spent adsorbents, Figure 16 (I–II).
In reference to the displayed SEM images in Figure 15, the morphologies of the two
presented carbons structures, as adsorbents, in this study have strongly changed. The
surface of both bio-char-activated structures had been totally with amorphous particles.
These changes in morphologies are mainly due to the increased efficiency of the two carbon
structures in adsorbing the organic pollutants from the phosphoric acid. Alongside with the
surface morphology, the given IR spectra in Figure 16 had verified the efficient removal of
organic species from phosphoric acid sample. Particularly, the intensity and broadness of
detected IR bands in the freshly made NAC and HAC have been strongly increased in their
spent adsorbents after the removal process. Furthermore, some additional peaks in the
range of 1400–1800 cm−1 that did not exist in the as-prepared structures could be noticed.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1229
Figure 15. SEM for (I) hydrochloric acid activated charcoal and (II) nitric acid activated charcoal after
OM adsorption process.
This can be as result of the uptake of the different OMs onto the surface of the spent
adsorbents. On the hand, the appearance of absorption band at 497 cm−1 in spectra of both
structures is indicative to hydrogen bonding of NAC and HAC with adsorbed OMs onto their
surfaces. This consequently may verify the suggested removal mechanism of OMs, as earlier
illustrated through this section.
Figure 16. FT-IR absorption bands for hydrochloric and nitric acid activated charcoal before and after
OM adsorption process.
clarification efficiency was 41.7% for granular charcoal, 67.2 for HAC activated charcoal,
and 60.1% for NAC activated charcoal.
Based on the aforementioned investigations, a process for commercial phosphoric
acid, 23.5% P2O5 treatment batch-wise with HAC activated carbon was developed. In this
respect, 1.0 l of crude phosphoric acid was treated with 10 g of HAC for 120 min at room
temperature. Subsequent filtration was occurred. The chemical analysis and the physical
properties of the treated di-hydrate phosphoric acid are given in Table 6.
throughout volume as shown in Figure 17. From the figure, it is obviously clear that the
carbon saturation capacity (Ce/Co equal 1) was achieved after 14 mL phosphoric acid.
Therefore, based on the OM concentration in the phosphoric acid working sample is 780
ppm and the weight of HAC carbon used is 10 g, it is clear that the carbon used has been
almost saturated with 1.09 g OM/g of the sorbent.
4. Conclusion
Biomass residual generated bio-char and its sub-produced acid activated charcoals have
been used for OM sorption from crude phosphoric acid, 23.5% P2O5. The adsorption onto
1232 M. H. TAHA ET AL.
Figure 18. Adsorption and desorption cycles for OM recovery using HAC.
the three carbonaceous structures (labelled as BC, HAC, and NAC) has reached equilibria
after 120 min of a processing time. Experimental results clarify that HAC activated carbon is
more effective than blank BC and NAC activated carbon towards the OM removal from
crude phosphoric acid. The obtained data were analysed through various kinetic models.
The acquired results have been successfully described by the pseudo-second order for blank
and acids activated bio-char. Thermodynamic investigation for the OM sorption process
indicated that the removal process had been of an endothermic behaviour. Simultaneously,
the thermodynamics parameters ΔH and ΔS were calculated and showed positive values
that could confirm the endothermic nature of the OM adsorption process. On the other
hand, ΔG was found to be negative value which refers to the execution of a spontaneous
process of pollutants removal.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
References
[1] J. Swietlik and E. Sikorska, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 15 (1), 145 (2006).
[2] M.S. Mansoury, H. Godini and G.H. Shams Khorramabadi, Iran. J. Health Environ. 8 (2), 181
(2015).
[3] A.H. Mahvi, M. Vosoughi, M.J. Mohammadi, A. Asadi, B. Hashemzadeh, A. Zahedi and S.
Pourfadakar, Health Scope 5 (1), e29966 (2016). doi:10.5812/jhealthscope.
[4] H. Belfadhel, A. Ratel, A. Ouederni, R.S. Bes and J.C. Mora, Ozone Sci. Eng. 17, 637 (1995).
doi:10.1080/01919512.1995.10555775.
[5] A. Mellah, A. Silem, R. Kada and A. Boualia, Can. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 36 (2), 94 (1991).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 1233
[6] W. Hamza, C. Chtara and M. Benzina, J. Chem. 2013, 218786 (2013). doi:10.1155/2013/
218786
[7] M.M. Fawzy, N.M. Farag, A.S. Amin and M.S. Elmaghrby, J. Bas. Environ. Sci. 5, 204 (2018).
[8] N.S. Awwad, Y.A. El-Nadi and M.M. Hamed, Chem. Eng. Process. 74, 69 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.
cep.2012.11.009.
[9] A.A. Hanna and A.F. Ali, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 55 (3), 205 (1992). doi:10.1002/
jctb.280550302.
[10] A. Mellah and D. Benachour, Ann. De. Chimie. 32 (5), 487 (2007). doi:10.3166/acsm.32.487-504.
[11] D.K. Singh, S. Mondal and J.K. Chakravartty, Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 34 (3), 201 (2016).
doi:10.1080/07366299.2016.1169142.
[12] T. Karanfil and M. Kitis, Environ. Sci. Technol 33, 3225 (1999). doi:10.1021/es9810179.
[13] S. Noshadi, V. Alipour, M. Heidari and K. Dindarloo Inaloo, Hormozgan Med. J. 20 (4), 241
(2016).
[14] H. Wiem, C. Chaker and B. Mourad, Res. Chem. Intermed. (2014). doi:10.1007/s11164-014-
1726-2
[15] U. Iriarte-Velasco, J.I. Alvarez-Uriarte and J.R. Gonza´lez-Velasco, Sep. Purif. Technol. 57, 152
(2007). doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2007.03.024.
[16] N. Areerachakul, S. Vigneswaran, H.H. Ngo and J. Kandasamy, Sep. Purif. Technol. 55, 206
(2007). doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2006.12.007.
[17] K.L. Jarvis and P. Majewski, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 380, 150 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.
jcis.2012.05.002.
[18] B. Khoualdia, M. Loungou and E. Elaloui, Arabian J. Chem. 10 (1), S1073–S1080 (2013).
doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.01.014.
[19] L. Monser, M. Ben Amor and M. Ksibi, Chem. Eng. Process. 38, 267 (1999). doi:10.1016/
S0255-2701(99)00008-2.
[20] N. Ando, Y. Matsui, R. Kurotobi, Y. Nakano, T. Matsushita and K. Ohno, Water Res. 44, 4127
(2010). doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.029.
[21] J.P. Chen, S. Wu and K.H. Chong, Carbon 41, 1979 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00197-0.
[22] J.L. Figueiredo, M.F.R. Pereira, M.M.A. Freitas and J.J.M. Orfao, Carbon 37, 1379 (1999).
doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00333-9.
[23] J.P. Chen and S. Wu, Langmuir 20, 2233 (2004).
[24] A.M.A. El Naggar, H.A. El Sayed, R.A. Elsalamony and A.A. Abd Elrazak, RSC Adv. 5, 77897
(2015). doi:10.1039/C5RA10621D.
[25] M.A. Moneim, A.M.A. El Naggar, H.A. El Sayed, M.S. Mostafa, N.M. Khalil and M.E.D. Hassan,
Egypt. J. Pet. 27 (3), 991 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.03.008.
[26] B. Li, Z. Lei and Z. Huang, Eng. Technol. 32 (5), 763 (2009). doi:10.1002/ceat.200800535.
[27] B. Khoualdia, M. Loungou and E. Elaloui, J. Chem. 10, 1073 (2013).
[28] D.M. Chapman and A.L. Roe, Zeolites 10 (8), 730 (1990). doi:10.1016/0144-2449(90)90054-U.
[29] G.W. Huber, S. Iborra and A. Corma, Chem. Rev. 106 (9), 4044 (2006). doi:10.1021/cr068360d.
[30] S.J. Paddison and J.A. Elliott, J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (33), 7583 (2005). doi:10.1021/jp0524734.
[31] P. Laflamme, A. Beaudoin, T. Chapaton, C. Spino and A. Soldera, J. Comput. Chem. 33 (12),
1190 (2012). doi:10.1002/jcc.22950.
[32] C. Korzeniewski, D.E. Snow and R. Basnayake, Appl. Spectrosc. 60 (6), 599 (2006).
doi:10.1366/000370206777670620.
[33] N.H. Shalaby, R.A. Elsalamony and A.M.A. El Naggar, New J. Chem. 42 (11), 9177 (2018).
doi:10.1039/C8NJ01479E.
[34] Y.S. Ho, J.C.Y. Ng and G. Mckay, Sep. Purif. Methods 29, 189 (2000). doi:10.1081/SPM-
100100009.
[35] W. Plazinski, W. Rudzinski and A. Plazinska, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 152, 2 (2009).
doi:10.1016/j.cis.2009.07.009.
[36] W. Plazinski and W. Rudzinski, Langmuir 26, 802–808 (2010). doi:10.1021/la902211c.
[37] H. Qiu, L.V. Lu, B. Pan, Q. Zhang, W. Zhang and Q. Zhang, J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. Annu. 10, 716
(2009). doi:10.1631/jzus.A0820524.
[38] Y.S. Ho, Scientometrics 5, 171 (2004).
1234 M. H. TAHA ET AL.