You are on page 1of 14

CLASSROOM ENGAGEMENT AND EXPERIENCES

AMONG LEARNERS: THEIR INFLUENCE


ON LEARNERS’PERFORMANCE IN
KITCHARAO DISTRICT, AGUSAN
DEL NORTE DIVISION
by
Viena Sabaldan Mondia
vienamondia@gmail.com

Abstract

This study was purposely conducted to find out the


relationship between classroom engagement and
experiences among learners of Kitcharao District, Division
of Agusan del Norte, and their influence on learners’
performance. The factors examined included classroom
engagement in terms of classroom participation, ability to
communicate and sense of belongingness. Similarly, it
ascertained classroom experiences with teachers’
strategy, peer relationship and appropriate learning
materials. Variables on learners’ performance included
academic achievement, school retention and socio–
emotional functioning.
The study used the descriptive-correlational research
design. Respondents were randomly selected and sample
size was obtained using Raosoft software. The statistical
tool used was Kendall’s Tau to get the significant
relationship between classroom engagement and
experiences; and their influence on learners performance.
Results revealed that there was a significant
relationship between classroom engagement and
experiences and the performance of learners among
intermediate learners. It also showed that the level of pupil
engagement and experiences were very satisfactory and
their influence on learners’ performance was remarkable.
Teachers’ strategy, peer relationship and appropriate
learning materials influenced classroom engagement. As
a result, pupils noted improvements on their academic

101
performance, school retention and positive socio–
emotional functioning. It was recommended that teachers
should give emphasis on pupils’ experiences in classroom
activities, not just to achieve standards even if these
standards are beyond pupils’ ability. The researcher
further recommended that DepEd officials and school
leaders intensify classroom observations and visitations to
guide the teachers on how to make classroom activities
more engaging in providing worthwhile experiences to the
learners as they interact with teachers, peers and learning
materials. Learning materials have to be designed to
promote classroom experiences to improve learners’
performance.

Introduction
Over the years, the Department of Education battles for
quality education. Recently, a shift to enhance curriculum
has been made to address the needs of 21st century pupils
and to ensure that quality education is at its peak. Although
rapid changes and educational upgrading are on its way,
pupils seem to have lost grip towards school. Less
engagement in school becomes evident due to
technological advancement which captivated pupils’
interest and divided attention. According to Cardwell
(2011), the discourse to remedy declining academic
motivation and success, inordinately high level of pupils’
boredom, and disproportionately high dropout rates paved
the way to study pupil engagement and experiences inside
the classroom.
Classroom engagement can be observed in pupils’
interest, affection and participation in the classroom.
Engagement simply is the involvement of the minds of
learners with what is to be learned. Teachers really need
to examine classroom engagement of learners for
successful learning. Learning requires the active
involvement of every learner.
Furthermore, pupil engagement opens a wider
opportunity to holistic classroom experiences. Knowledge
about how children learn and what motivate them
increased utilization of teaching–learning resources,
school climate, and positive behaviors.

102
Schools and teachers can dramatically influence the
extent and quality of learning for all pupils. The emphasis
must be on success, rather than on failures and
shortcomings. To make these possible, a learning
environment needs to be created in a way that all children
feel safe and understood and reach their full potential.
After all, this is the mission of the teaching profession.
The Philippine educational system adapts to the
change of society. In Jaliobong Elementary School, for
example, teachers observed some changes on pupils’
behaviors. Teachers claimed that children now respond
negatively to traditional methods of teaching. The
conventional chalk-talk method drain them and autocratic
discipline won’t work anymore. Moreover, pupils are easily
bored and at times disruptive, and difficult to discipline.
Negative behaviors are one thing, and when pupils’ school
performance is affected, it can be quite alarming. Teachers
of Jaliobong Elementary School found out from the
Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil IRI) pre-test
results which revealed that there are pupils in Grades 4, 5
and 6 who are still at the frustration and instructional
reading levels. It was ascertained by the teachers that
these pupils were withdrawn and disengaged with
classroom activities due to absenteeism. Teachers further
added that these pupils do not go to school every day and
when they do, they cause troubles and do not participate
at all. According to Smith, Weiss, Carolan (2010)
emotional and social problems affect children’s ability to
learn to read, to follow directions and rules, and socialize
and interact with their peers and teachers. It can be said
that activities in which children indulge and experience an
emotional outcome can have impact in their ability to learn.
The general interest of this research is to study the
level of classroom engagement and experiences among
elementary pupils and their influence on learners’
performance so that teachers may use strategies that will
develop pupils’ interest towards learning and be able to
engage in varied school experiences.

103
Moreover, learning materials are to be developed that may
encourage pupils’ engagement and experiences inside the
classroom.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework
The study is anchored on the Self–Determination
Theory of Ryan and Deci. Self–Determination theory which
(SDT) suggests that learning occurs when pupils are
cognitively and emotionally engaged. The theory assumes
that pupils regardless of age, gender, and socio-economic
status, nationality, or cultural background, possess
inherent growth tendencies for intrinsic motivation,
curiosity, psychological needs that provide motivational
foundation for their high-quality classroom engagement
and positive school functioning (Reeve, 2012). Reeve
added that the theory acknowledges that pupils
sometimes lack self-motivation, display disaffection, and
act irresponsibly. SDT research identifies the classroom
conditions that support and vitalize pupils’ inner
motivational resources versus those that neglect,
undermine, and thwart them. This addresses how pupils’
inner resources interact with classroom conditions to result
in varying levels of pupils’ engagement.
This theory relates on how pupils participate,
communicate and feel the sense of belongingness when
engaged with motivational resources which are their
teachers, peers and the learning materials used in
instruction. These resources can contribute to pupils’ inner
affection towards learning.
Taking into account pupils’ psychological variables like
interest, curiosity and needs, teachers can involve, nurture
and vitalize these variables during the flow of instruction
and even displaying positive appeal to facilitate high–
quality pupil engagement.
On the other hand, pupils ability to interact with others
in a safe and inviting environment gave them intrinsic
motivation to feel the sense of belongingness.

104
With the help of peers, pupils can be more productive and
engaged if motivated intrinsically – feeling connected and
welcomed in the context they are in.
Although addressing pupils’ psychological needs is of
significance, it is a fact that children build their experiences
from the lessons learned everyday. The more children
learn, the more they crave for knowledge as cognitive
individuals. Pupils are motivated to learn to satisfy their
cognitive needs.
This theory shows how intrinsic and extrinsic
motivational resources affect one another. SDT assumes
that pupils have their own ways and pace of motivating
themselves with regard to the factors that facilitate
engagement.

Statement of the Problem


This research sought to find out the level of classroom
engagement and experiences and their influence on the
learners’ performance of Kitcharao District, Agusan del
Norte Division.
Specifically, this answered the following questions:

1. What is the extent of classroom engagement


among learners in terms of:
1.1 classroom participation
1.2 ability to communicate
1.3 sense of belongingness
2. What is the extent of classroom experiences
among learners in terms of:
2.1 teachers’ strategy
2.2 peer relationship
2.3 learning materials appropriateness
3. What is the level of learners performance in terms
of:
3.1 academic achievement
3.2 school retention
3.3 socio–emotional functioning

105
4. Is there a significant relationship between the
classroom engagement and experiences and learners’
performance?
5. What instructional material may be designed
based on the findings?

Hypothesis
Ho1. There is no significant relationship between
classroom engagement and experiences and learners’
performance.

Findings
The primary goal of this study is to find out the
relationship between classroom engagement and
experiences and learners’ performance.
Data were summarized and processed and results of
the analysis revealed the following findings:
On the extent of classroom engagement, the results
revealed that the Grades 4, 5 and 6 pupils were very
satisfactory as to participation, communication and sense
of belongingness with an overall average weighted mean
of 3.77.
Moreover, on the extent of classroom experiences of
the learners, findings showed that the classroom
experiences were considerably high with a weighted mean
of 4.24. The variables involved in this regard, were on
experiences with teachers’ strategy, peer relationship and
appropriateness of leaning materials.
In addition, results revealed that classroom
engagement and classroom experiences influence
learners’ performance, with an average weighted mean of
3.96. Further, data revealed that pupils improved their
academic achievement, with a relatively high pupil
retention, and learners have positive socio–emotional
functioning.
Findings further revealed that classroom engagement
and experiences influenced learners’ performance.
Furthermore, findings revealed that instructional materials
have to be developed in such a way that it will promote
learners’ experiences inside the classroom through

106
collaborative efforts, differentiated activities, hands on
activities, localization and contextualization.
As to significant relationship between classroom
experiences and engagement among learners and their
performance, findings showed that there is a significant
relationship between classroom engagement and
learners’ performance. It also conceded that classroom
experiences is significantly correlated to learners’
performance in the different grade levels.

Conclusions
Given the findings of the study, the following
conclusions were drawn:
Pupils of Kitcharao District have high extent of
classroom engagement and experiences which influenced
pupils’ performance. Therefore, there is a significant
relationship between classroom engagement and
experiences with learners’ performance.
In summary, the Grades 4, 5 and 6 learners
participated in class activities, communicated well and felt
a sense of belongingness with their experiences with their
teachers, peers and learning materials resulting to an
improved academic achievement, school retention and
positive socio–emotional functioning.

Recommendations
Based on the findings and conclusions of this study
the recommendations were offered for considerations:
DepEd officials need to intensify instructional
supervision focused on classroom strategies appropriate
learning devices and interactions of learners during the
teaching-learning process.
School heads need to initiate regular activities that will
develop pupils, both academically and socially.
Teachers must continually adapt and adhere to
feedbacks to improved instruction. The social environment
in school need to provide increased engagement and
activities in school.

107
Pupils’ engagement is a high complex construct with many
attributes and subcomponents for future researchers to
further research on.

References

Aguiton, R. (2012). The Relationship Between Student


Engagement, Recess and Instructional
Strategies. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation).
Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ Retrieved
on [July 25, 2018].

Ammermueller, A. (2012). Violence in European schools:


A widespread phenomenon that matters for
educational production. Labour Economics, 19(6),
908-922. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.08.010.
Retrieved on [January 7, 2019].

Arguera, N. & Dyjur, P. (2017). A discussion on of Student


engagement indicators and strategies in higher
education. Retrieved from
https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/5
2112/ Retrieved on [July 25, 2018].

Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J., and Pagani, L.


(2010). Student engagement and its
relationship with early high school dropout. Journal
of Adolescence 32, 651-670.

Bear, G. G., Yang, C., Chen, D., He, X., Xie, J.-S., &
Huang, X. (2018). Differences in school
climate and student engagement in China and the
United States. School Psychology Quarterly,
33(2), 323-335. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000247 Retrieved
on [January 5, 2019].

108
Boxer, P., Goldstein, S. E., DeLorenzo, T., Savoy, S., &
Mercado, I. (2010). Educational
aspiration- expectation discrepancies: Relation to
socioeconomic and academic risk-related factors.
Journal of Adolescence, 34(4), 609-617.

Cardwell, Michelle E. (2011). Patterns of Relationships


Between Teacher Engagement and Student
Engagement. Education Doctoral Paper 49.
Retrieved from
https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?articl
e=1050&context=education_etd
Retrieved on [July 25, 2018].

Conner, J. O, & Pope, D.C. (2013). Not just robo –


students: Why full engagement matters
and how school can promote it. Journal of Youth
and Adoloscence, 42(9), 1426-1442.
Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-
013-9948-y. Retrieved on [January 3,
2019].
Corpus, B. B. and Salandanan, G. G. (2015). Principles of
Teaching (with TLE) 2. Quezon City,
Philippines : Lorimar Publishing Inc.
Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom Context,
School Engagement, and Academic
Achievement in Early Adolescence. Journal of
Youth Adolescence ,40, 1649-1660.
Emmer, E. and Sabornie, E. (2015). Handbook on
Classroom Management. Second edition. New
York, N10017: P ublished by Routledge 711 Third
Avenue.
Fredericks, J. A. (2014). Eight Myths of Study
Disengagement: Creating Classrooms of Deep
Learning. Los Angeles: Corwin. Retrieved from
https://www.amazon.com/Eight-Myths-Student-
Disengagement-Educational/dp/1452271887
Retrieved on [August 8, 2018].

109
Furrer, C., Skinner, S. & Pitzer, J. (2014). The Influence of
Teacher and Peer Relationships on Students’
Classroom Engagement and Everyday Resilience.
Volume 113, Issue 1, pp. 101-123 Copyright by
Teachers College, Columbia University.

Gunuc, S. (2014). The Relationships Between Student


Engagement And Their Academic
Achievement. International Journal on New Trends
in Education and Their Implications, Volume: 5
Issue: 4 Article: 19.

Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning


on student engagement: Results from an
intervention. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498035.
Retrieved on [August 13, 2018].

Hughes, K. (2015). The impact student engagement on


achievement and well – being. ResearchGate.
Retrieved from DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2536.3684
Retrieved [November 30, 2018].

Hughes, K. & Coplan, R.J. (2010). Exploring the processes


linking shyness and academic
achievement in childhood. School Psychology
Quarterly, 25, 213-222.

James, N. P. (2015). Golden Rules for Engaging Students


in Learning Activities. Retrieved from
https://www.edutopia.org/blog/golden-rules-for-
engaging- students-nicolas-pino-james.
Retrieved on [September 24, 2018].

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging


students in learning activities: It is not
autonomy support or structure but autonomy
support and structure. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 102(3), 588-600.

110
Kernahan, C., Zheng, W. & Davis, T. (2014) et al, (2014).
A Sense of Belonging:How Student Feelings
Correlate with Learning about Race. International
Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and
Learning, Vol. 8: No. 2, Article 4.

Kindermann, T. A & Skinner, E. A. (2012). Will the real


peer group please stand up?
A“tensegrity” approach to examining the
synergistic influences of peer groups and
friendship networks on academic development. In
A. Ryan & G. Ladd (Eds.), Peer
relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 51-78).
Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Kraft, M. A. (2012). The effect of teacher–family


communication on student engagement:
Evidence from a randomized field experiment.
Journal of Research on Educational
Effectiveness, 6(3), 199-222.

Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2010). Continuity and


Change in Early School Engagement:
Predictive of Children’s Achievement Trajectories
from First to Eighth Grade. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 101, 190-206. Retrieved
from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013153 Retrieved
on [February 12, 2019].

Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school


engagement during adolescence: Implications
for grades, depression, delinquency, and
substance use. Developmental Psychology, Vol
47(1), 233-247.

111
Okongo, R., Ngao, G., Rop, N., Nyongesa, W. (2015).
Information Communication Technologies As A
Support Strategy For Learners Experiencing
Reading Difficulties. A Journal for Language
Learning 34(2):1-13. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.5785/34-2-807 Retrieved on
[February 8, 2019].

Randolph, J. J., Kangas, M., & Ruokamo, H. (2010).


Predictors of Dutch and Finnish children’s
satisfaction with schooling. Journal of Happiness
Studies, 11, 193-204.

Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective


on Student Engagement. Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aebe/c232c843f4
bc935c24a03e15e5bd1 ea997e3.pdf
Retrieved on [September 18, 2019].

Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., and


Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional
climate, student engagement, and academic
achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,
104(3), 700-712.

Roorda, D. (2011). The Influence of Affective Teacher –


Student Relationships on Students’s
School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta –
Analytic Approach. Review of Educational
Research, 81 (4): 493 – 529.

Sabin, J. T. (2015) Teacher Morale, Student Engagement,


and Student Achievement Growth in Reading: A
Correlational Study. Journal of Organizational &
Educational Leadership, Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 5.

Sanapo, M. S. (2017). When Kids Hurt Other Kids: Bullying


in Philippine Schools. Psychology, 8, 2469-2484.

112
Shindler, J. (2010). Transformative classroom
management: positive strategies to engage all
students and promote a psychology of success.
San Fransisco, USA: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.

Sicat, A.S. (2014). Emergent Technologies – based


Teaching Strategies. Quezon City:
Published by Lorimar Publishing, INC.

Silver, H. & Perini, M. (2010). The eight Cs of engagement:


How learning styles and instructional design
increase student commitment to learning. Solution
Tree. Retrieved from
http://lackawannaschools.org/cms/lib/NY1900033
7/Centricity/ModuleInstance/865/TheEight_Cs_of
_Engagement.pdf. Retrieved on [January 3, 2018].

Skiba, R., Ormiston, H., Martinez, S., & Cummings, J.


(2016). Teaching the Social Curriculum:
Classroom Management as Behavioral Instruction,
Theory Into Practice, 55:2, 120-128, Retrieved
from DOI:10.1080/00405841.2016.1148990
Retrieved on January 12, 2019Smith, B.C.E.,
Weiss, C.C. & Carolan, B.V. (2010). Big school,
small school: (re)testing assumptions about high
school size, school engagement and mathematics
achievement. Journal on Youth Adolescence.
Retrieved from doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-
9402-3 Retrieved on [January 5, 2019].

Stronge, J. (2018). Qualities of Effective Teachers. 3rd


Edition. ASCD 1703 N. Beauregard St.
Alexandra: VA 22311 – 1714 USA.

Trowler, V. (2010). Student Engagement Literature


Review. Retrieved from
https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/studen
tengagementliteraturere view_1.pdf.
Retrieved on [September 23, 2018].

113
Walton & Cohen (2011). A Brief Social-Belonging
Intervention Improves Academic and
Health Outcomes of Minority Students. Science,
Vol. 331, Issue 6023, pp. 1447-1451.

Wang, C. W., & Neihart, M. (2015). How do supports from


parents, teachers, and peers influence
academic achievement of twice-exceptional
students. Gifted Child Today, 38(3), 148-159.

Yazziemintz, E. (2010). Leading for Engagement.


Principal Leadership, v10 n7 p54-58.

114

You might also like