Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Klein Eisner 5 Ab
Klein Eisner 5 Ab
Ms. Eisner
Feb 5 2024
Annotated Bibliography
www.proquest.com/docview/2904666740/5C019DCF40734BA6PQ/9?sourcetype=Schol
In this article, there is a heavy focus on media literacy and specifically how to teach
media literacy to today's youth. Additionally, the article delves into the developing
today's youth. A variety of questions are offered for the reader to ask themselves or others
to ensure that they are thinking about conspiracy theories in a constructive and critical
manner. Brumbelow also introduces the concept of the three P’s (perspectives,
positioning, and power), which she urges the reader to be mindful of whenever they are
addition to being an author and researcher, she is also a high school English teacher. This
article was written last year so there is information and analysis on current events that
have not so far been heavily analyzed in an academic context as opposed to a more
emotional context. The only potential limitation that I found with this article was that
since it is coming from a teacher, Brumbelow may harbor some biases in favor of
education, however, I do not anticipate that these biases detract from the source’s value.
Stark, Craig. "'What, me worry?': Teaching media literacy through satire and Mad magazine."
The Clearing House, vol. 76, no. 6, Aug. 2003. ProQuest Central K12,
www.proquest.com/docview/196891445/fulltext/5320AC44A8974247PQ/1?accountid=4
This article delves into the relationship between satire and media literacy. Additionally,
this article investigates to see if satire may possess the ability to teach people to be more
critical of the media that they consume. Mainstream satirical content such as Saturday
Night Live, South Park, and MAD magazine is analyzed in an academic context and
heavily scrutinized to see if there is a potential value in using pop culture behemoths as a
vehicle way to teach media literacy. In this article, Stark presents satire as something that
is not inherently good or bad but layered and complicated. A heavy emphasis is placed on
not viewing satire as a monolith. Bogel’s Triangle of Satire, which is a triangle between
the satirist, satirized object, and their audience is heavily featured and analyzed
throughout the article. Being that this article was written twenty-three years ago, I am
anticipating that the age of this article could have the potential to be a major limitation
within this source as some terms used may potentially be offensive in today's political
and cultural climate, the language used may be antiquated, and research may be required
for me to understand some references. On the other hand, I think that having an article
from twenty-three years ago could have the potential to be a valuable asset for my
research since I can explore how drastically the landscape surrounding satire and media
Poulsen, Shannon. "Comparing beliefs in falsehoods based on satiric and non-satiric news." PLoS
www.proquest.com/docview/2767164696/603988AEB12043B1PQ/2?sourcetype=Schola
interpret news created with satirical intentions as fact. This article quantifies the effects of
misinformation through statistics. The data used in this article originates from a
twelve-wave, six-month panel from two thousand nineteen. People's beliefs in one
hundred twenty falsehoods in political media, forty-eight of them being satirical are
analyzed. In addition to their beliefs and interpretations of media, the political parties,
gender identities, and racial demographics of participants in the study are broken down
article delving into how someone's identity can affect the beliefs that they form and how
they tend to interpret media due to those same beliefs. The article explores and analyzes
many facets of the argument surrounding political satire, such as that it can be used as a
vessel to educate the masses or on the other hand that it is a nefarious form of
misinformation disguised as comedy. I do not anticipate any limitations with this article,