You are on page 1of 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/261698252

Low Coverage Palladium Adsorption on Graphene: First Principles Study

Article in Quantum Matter · October 2015


DOI: 10.1166/qm.2015.1215

CITATIONS READS
2 231

5 authors, including:

Yusuf Zuntu Abdullahi Md Mahmudur Rahman


Kaduna State University Universiti Putra Malaysia
24 PUBLICATIONS 65 CITATIONS 38 PUBLICATIONS 101 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Shamsu Abubakar Henry Setiyanto


Universiti Putra Malaysia Bandung Institute of Technology
8 PUBLICATIONS 11 CITATIONS 55 PUBLICATIONS 137 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Molecularly imprinted polymers nanofiber: synthesis, characterization and their application for water and waste water treatment View project

Density Functional Study of Cr Atom Adsorption on Hydrogen-Terminated Armchair Boron Nitride Nanoribbons View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Shamsu Abubakar on 17 March 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


RESEARCH ARTICLE
Copyright © 2015 American Scientific Publishers Quantum Matter
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America
Vol. 4, 1–6, 2015

Low Coverage Palladium Adsorption on Graphene:


First Principles Study
Yusuf Zuntu Abdullahi1 2 , Md. Mahmudur Rahman1 ∗ , Shamsu Abubakar1 3 ,
Rifki Muhida3 , and Henry Setiyanto4
1
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kaduna State University, P.M.B. 2339, Kaduna State, Nigeria
3
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Yobe State University, P.M.B. 1144, Yobe State, Nigeria
3
Department of Physics, Surya College of Education (STKIP Surya), Gedung SURE, Jl. Scientia Boulevard Blok U/7,
Gading Serpong, Tangerang 15810, Banten, Indonesia
4
Analytical Chemistry Research Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung,
JI Ganesha No. 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

In this paper, we investigate stable geometries, electronic and magnetic properties of low coverage palladium
(Pd) atom adsorption on graphene using first principles calculations with the generalized gradient approximation.
Calculations show that single Pd atom located at the top of carbon atom is the energetically favorable config-
uration, and is found to be semiconductor and non-magnetic. We also compute the projected density of states
(PDOS) around Fermi level and beyond. It is found that, C-Pd covalent interaction is mainly dominated by 2pz
of C, 5s and 4d like states of Pd. For low coverage stable Pd dimer, the adsorption is characterized by strong
hybridization between the palladium atoms and the two carbon atoms bonded directly to it. A much weakening
of Pd–Pd bond is observed and the C-Pd covalent bonds mainly dominate by 2pz of C orbital indicating that
planar coating can be achieved. Thus, this work reveals that uniform coating of Pd atom can be achieved and
may be useful in transport measurements.

Keywords: Graphene, Density Functional Theory, Geometric, Electric, Magnetic Properties.

1. INTRODUCTION have theoretically investigated the geometry, electronic and mag-


The fascinating physics of graphene, a single layer of graphite, netic properties of fifteen transition metal (TM) single atoms
has been one of the central interest that fuelled numerous adsorbed graphene system using density functional theory. Their
studies1 10–18 since its isolation.2 Due to its peculiar two dimen- results indicated that the graphene properties can be effectively
sional natures, it exhibits, unique properties such as magneto tuned by TM adsorption and further give an account based on
transport,1 tunable band gap,3 extremely high carrier mobility,4 strong covalent binding that, palladium among others can be
electron confinement effects5 and Klein tunneling nature.6 While used as a functional material to coat uniformly graphene and
various groups have succeeded in getting isolated graphene carbon nanotubes. In another recent study, Thapa et al. have stud-
sheet with different techniques,7 there have also been continuing ied Pd adatom and dimer adsorption on graphene with the aim
efforts simultaneously to explore the effects of various adsorbed of revealing the structural, electronic and magnetic properties
guest atoms8 9 or molecules10 11 on graphene because poten- and predicted the appearance of magnetic moment for palladium
tial applications and electronic transports properties measurement dimer adsorbed in perpendicular direction,17 although no mag-
with graphene require contact with metal electrodes.12 Moreover, netic moment has been confirmed for Pd single atom which is
graphene has been used experimentally as a substrate for growth in perfect agreement with the previous works.8 15 However, they
of nanometer-sized crystal structures13 which indicates the possi- do not reports the details electronic properties of dimer in par-
bility of controlling the structure to produce viable future nanode- allel configurations. As predicted by Ref. [8] that uniform coat-
vices. Among the widely studied single atoms,14 15 dimers16 17 ing is an attractive properties of Pd different from other metal
and molecules10 on graphene, research interest in transition metal which is significant in making contact between electrode and
adsorption continue to grow fast and expands the ranges of appli- graphene, therefore, it will be interesting to understand effects
cations from catalysis, spintronics to magnetic device. Hu et al.8 of low coverage palladium atoms on the properties of graphene.
Experimentally, sundaram et al. have observed that, palladium

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. atoms nucleated at edges and defect of the graphene sheets by

Quantum Matter Vol. 4, No. 4, 2015 2164-7615/2015/4/001/006 doi:10.1166/qm.2015.1215 1


RESEARCH ARTICLE Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015

electro-deposition.18 However, there are no prio reports on the space of 15 Å in vertical direction is considered so that inter
electronic structure changes of pure graphene uponparallel Pd adatoms and dimers interactions can be reduced. In the case
dimer adsorption on pure graphene. In view of this, our main of single Pd adsorption on graphene sheet, three high symmet-
objective of this study is to contribute to the understanding of ric sites are considered. The hollow (H) site is at the center of
this effect of adsorption of low coverage palladium atoms on hexagon, the bridge site (B) at the middle point of carbon–carbon
graphene properties. To achieve this goal, we have investigated bond and top (T) site directly above carbon atom as shown in
the various adsorption geometries and then examined the chem- the Figure 1(a). For Pd atoms adsorption on graphene sheet, six
ical electronic structure of the system based on projected den- configurations are employed. Three dimer perpendicular config-
sity of states and charge transfer of the favored configurations. urations with lower atom bonded to graphene sheet at H, B and
As a result of our analysis, we find strong covalent interactions T sites are denoted by PH , PB and PT respectively as shown
between the carbon atom in the graphene structure and the Palla- in Figure (a). Three dimers parallel to graphene sheet for Pd
dium atom. Moreover, the Löwdin’s charge analysis and charge atoms with configurations denoted as RH , having two atoms sit-
density distribution are computed to support our findings. ting above two neighboring H sites, RB with its two atoms sitting
above opposite B sites and RT Having two atoms sitting above
2. CALCULATION METHODOLOGY AND opposite T sites on the same sheets shown in Figure 1(c). The
isolated inter dimer distance is found by optimizing dimer in a
CONVERGENCES
simple cubic cell of (12×12×12 Å) dimension. Only the gamma
We have performed first principles19 calculations based on
points of the BZ are considered during relaxation. To avoid being
density functional theory implemented in the QUANTUM
trapped at meta-stable structures in the structural optimization
ESPRESSO simulation package.20 We used a plane wave basis
process, a series of static calculations are performed. In this pro-
set to expand the wave functions. The electron–electron inter-
cess the adatom is fixed at an adsorption sites with several dis-
action is expressed within generalized gradient approximation
(GGA) and spin polarized GGA as parameterized by Perdew- tances along the line normal to the graphene sheet. The favored
Burkew-Enzerhof21 exchange correlation scheme. The choice of distance from the graphene sheetis obtained from the global min-
GGA is due to the performance in getting ground state proper- imum of the adsorption energy curve of each adsorption site.
ties of the combined metal graphene system. Electron-ion core The stability curvesare adsorption energy versus Pd-graphene
interaction is treated by ultrasoft pseudopotential for C and sheet distances for three sites, H, B and T sites is shown in the
Pd(4d9 5s 1 valence orbitals as in the pseudopotential file) atoms.22 Figure 2. When stable distances for each configuration are found,
All pseudopotentials can be found from the Plane-Wave Self- the relaxation are performed along all the atomic coordinates
Consistent Field(PWSCF) pseudopotential online references.23 but keeping the cell dimension fixed. We used Broyden-Fletcher-
To expand the wave functions, we have used plain-wave basis Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) algorithm for the forces and energy
with the kinetic energy cut-off of 500 eV. For integrals, smearing minimization process. However, after full relaxation, the dimers
is employed to aid convergences and to be specific, Marzari- were found slightly deviate slightly from their original high sym-
Vanderbilt method24 with small Gausian spreading of 0.03 eV metric locations, and the new position shows the nearest possible
was used. For Brillouin zone (BZ) integrations, we sampled 8 × configurations.
8 × 1 set of k-points with the Mankhorst-Pack scheme.25 In mod-
eling graphene sheet, we used 4 × 4 × 1 supercell containing 32
carbon atoms is constructed in a 3-dimensional periodic boundary 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
conditions with 2.46 Å in plane lattice constant which is in agree- In present work, Pd is considered to be adsorbed on graphene
ment with the graphene experimental lattice parameter.26 The sheet at three most stable adsorption sites namely, H sites (center
graphene sheet constructed is then optimized and the inter-atom of hexagon), T site (atom top site) and B site (above mid-point
distance was found to be 1.42 Å. To minimize the interaction of bond top site) as shown in the Figure 1(a). Table I summarizes
between graphene sheet and its neighboring image, a vacuum the details geometric stabilities parameters and magnetic moment

(a) (b) (c)

Fig. 1. Possible adsorption sites for Pd atoms on a monolayer graphene and supercell model. (a) Three Pd adatom and dimer (perpendicular) adsorption
sites for with notations; center of hexagon (H), top of carbon atom (T) and bond center (B), (b) most stable Pd adatom adsorption on carbon atom in graphene
sheet named T (c) side view of the adsorbed parallel configuration named RT with two Pd atoms sitting directly above carbon atom in the graphene sheet.

2
Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015 RESEARCH ARTICLE

disagreement with their favored site. The difference in adatom


adsorption energy between our calculations and the results in
Refs. [8, 17] are likely due to choices of basis functions and
exchange correlation functionals which are sensitive to the elec-
tronic configurations in the pseudopotentials used. For example,
we employed PBE functional, wave function cut-off energy of
500 eV and a RRKJ ultrasoft pseudopotential while Hu et al.8
used PBE functional, wave function of 400 eV and Vander-
bilt ultasoft pseudopotential. Although Ref. [17] reported closely
lying values between B and T sites, our result is more consis-
tent to the case of cupper (Cu) atom adsorption on graphene
reported by Wu et al.,28 since Pdatomhas similar valence orbital,
it’s expected to have the same way of interactions with the carbon
atom. Furthermore, Pd atom located at the T site shows the low-
est bond length among the rest of the stable configurations indi-
Fig. 2. Adsorption energy for Pd-graphene system as a function of distance cating strong covalent bond between Pd atom and C of graphene
between adatom and graphene sheet. sheet. Additionally, for the most stable configuration, there is a
slight vertical deformation of the carbon atom right below the Pd
per unit cell for the obtained various adsorbed adatom/dimer adatom which rises by a distance of about 0.12 Å; this is due to
graphene configurations, i.e., the adsorption energy, adsorption direct hybridization between the carbon in the graphene and the
height above the graphene sheet, Löwdin’s charge analysis27 of adatom. Figure 3(a), shows the top and side view charge den-
the atom in which the difference between the number of neutral sity plots of the energetically stable configurations of Pd atom
valence electron and Löwdin’s charge is regarded as the number and the carbon atom directly bonded. The figure reveals that the
of electrons transferred, the angle made by atom/dimer-carbon system is stabilized under adatom adsorption with some distri-
with bond-graphene sheet angle and the magnetic moment of the butions of electron density between adatom and carbon atoms
adatom adsorbed graphene. The stability for adatom or dimer is around it. Moreover, the bonding between C and Pd shows that
measured by the adsorption energy defined as the electronic charge density resides between the adatom and car-
bon atom in the graphene structure which suggests sharing of
Eads = EGM − EG − nEM (1) electron charge density between adsorbent and graphene resulting
in mutual interaction and this agrees with the a Löwdin’s charge
in unit of eV/atom, where EGM represents the spin-polarized total analysis between Pd and graphene listed in the Table I. For the
energy of the Pd graphene system, EM stands for the total energy various stable adsorption sites investigated, not more than 05e
of the isolated single or dimer Pd and EG is the total energy charge transfer is observed, indicating that the M–G bonds are
of the isolated graphene per 4 × 4 supercell. Detail discussion is of covalent nature. However, in spite of charge transfer between
presented in the following subsections. adatom and graphene, Pd adsorbed system shows no magnetic
moment in all the adsorption sites, which is in perfect agreement
3.1. Adsorption of Palladium Adatom on Graphene to the reported results.8 17 Moreover, absent of magnetism is as
The adsorption energies and bond lengths listed in the Table I a result of totally bonded electrons of the Pd adatom-graphene
suggest that the Pd adatoms are chemisorbed on graphene. The system, leading to there being no residual spin-polarized charge
site with the most negative adsorption energy is referred to as the in the system as can be seen from Figure 4.
most favorable one. The most stable adsorption site for a single To have an insight into theelectronic structures of the favored
Pd is T-site with corresponding adsorption energy −1.027 eV. single Pd configuration, Figure 4, shows spin-polarized total and
In comparisons to the results of the recent works for palladium projected density of states for the most stable configuration of
Pd adsorbed graphene8 17 we found that adsorption energy is in the Pdadsorbed-graphene system and the nearest bonded C atom.

Table I. Details of the optimized structural properties for Palladium atom and dimer adsorbed on graphene.

Atom Site Eads (eV) h (Å) dMG (Å) dMM (Å) MC−G   q (e) qd (e) mMG (B)

Pd H −0850 2028 2460 – 54431 9.646 9.524 000


B −0984 2140 2256 – 82015 9.558 9.558 000
T −1027 2225 2109 – 92665 9.733 9.561 000
RH −1012 2223 2657 2824 58034 9.745 (9.748) 9.538 (9.484) 000
RB −1040 2142 2273 2722 87172 9.722 (9.728) 9.482 (9.488) 000
RT −1239 2249 2130 2713 86760 9.760 (9.760) 9.477 (9.477) 000
PH −0362 2103 2536 2534 55638 9.763 (10.058) 9.223 (9.331) 081
PB −0519 2156 2344 2554 66647 9.824 (9.928) 9.355 (9.377) 126
PT −0611 2242 2330 2531 88341 9.802 (10.026) 9.327 (9.369) 215

Notes: The adsorption energies Eads , the average height of adatom over all carbon atoms hA0 , the averaged nearest neighboring metal adatom carbon bond length dMG , Löwdin total
charge q and valence d orbital charge qd , the data outside the bracket are the charge for lower atom directly bonded to graphene and the values inside the bracket are the result for
upper atom in the perpendicular dimer configurations PH PB and PT respectively whereas the parallel configurations (RH , RB and RT ) have their charges results with both atom directly
bind to graphene at their respective adsorption sites depicted by the subscripts in unit of eV, the inter dimer bond length dMM ; the MC−G bond-graphene sheet angles (degree) and
the magnetic moments mMG of dimer adsorbed on graphene system per unit cell.

3
RESEARCH ARTICLE Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015

Fig. 3. Charge density plots: Scale nr  signifying ranges of isodensity values in a.u. (a) Top and side view charge distribution of the most stable Pd atom-
adsorbed graphene configuration. (b) The corresponding top view charge distribution of the most stable for Pd dimer-adsorbed graphene system (c) Side view
of the perpendicular dimer adsorbed on carbon top i.e., PT configuration with white indicating charge accumulation and light pink charge depletions.

It reveals that, in spite of the low coverage single Pd adsorbed, charge is found to be visible in either adatom or carbon atom
the Pd completely destroy the delocalized  orbital there by directly below it. Consistent with valence orbital available in the
modifying the electronic structure of graphene layer from semi- pseudopotentials which is stated in Section 2, the states from
metal to a semiconducting material with energy band gap of approximately −4.0 eV to 2.0 eV is partly contributed by 4d
approximately 0.49 eV at the Fermi level. The symmetric distri- orbitals like states and mainly dominated by the C-pz like states
butions of density of states in both spin up and spin down even at with obvious shape peaks within the two regions. Moreover, at
the vicinity of Fermi level further reveals the reasons for the zero the vicinity of Fermi energy, i.e., within approximately −2.0 eV
net magnetic moment in the system. Although charge transfer to −0.24 eV 3d states dominates in both spin up and spin down
is observed between the adatom and the graphene, no polarized states of Pd and partly contributed by pz of C states.

3.2. Palladium Adsorbed Dimer


To examine quantitatively the geometric features of the dimers Pd
adsorbed graphene system; six configurations have been consid-
ered for relaxations with two palladium atoms bind to graphene
sheet at three adsorption sites either in perpendicular or parallel
directions as discussed in the previous subsections. It is worth
noting that the rationale behind testing different configurations is
to further present an insight on the nature of the stable geometry
of the favored configurations among others even though previous
work tends to give priority to the one that yields viable physi-
cal properties.17 We summarize the adsorption energy, structural
and other physical parameter results for all the relaxed dimer
adsorbed graphene system in Table I. To insure good accuracy of
our analysis, we calculate the bond length of an isolated dimer
Pd in a 12 × 12 × 12 Å simple cubic cell. Our calculated bond
lengths for dimer differ from the previous studies by 0.035 Å.30
Comparedwith the recent reported result,17 the RT (with Pd atom
located on the opposite C atom in the graphene sheet) is energeti-
cally favorable configuration among others, and correspondingly,
the adsorption energy is found to be −1.239 eV. Interestingly, our
results report closely laying values for adsorption energy in paral-
lel configurations as compare to the recent report.17 This is due to
slight tilt by the dimer from its original high symmetric locations
after full structural relaxation in which the new positions show
the nearest stable configurations. Furthermore, from Table I, it
can be observed that, for most dimer configurations, the paral-
lel ones are energetically stable than the perpendicular ones and
correspondingly the height above graphene sheet varies accord-
ing to the adsorption sites indicating strong interactions in some
cases. This is due to net energetic contribution by each Pd atom
in contact with graphene sheet. The bond length for the stable
configuration is 2.713 Å, larger than that for the isolated dimer
Fig. 4. The spin-polarized total and projected density of states for the ener- by 0.235 Å, and therefore Pd–Pd is much weakened after adsorp-
getically stable single Pd adsorbed-graphene system. tion (the bond length changes by approximately 23%). The large

4
Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015 RESEARCH ARTICLE

preference and enhanced magnetic moment can be attributed to


the strong interaction between the two Pd atoms leaving the C
atom directly below the lower Pd atom with unpaired electrons.
Moreover, Figure 3(c), depicts the distribution of charges, the
interaction between the lower Pd and the contact carbon atom in
PT is clearly evidenced by the depreciation of the electron charge
density around the region of the interactions. The charge anal-
ysis (see Table I) shows transfer of an electron from the lower
atom to top Pd atom. Thus, lower Pd losses 0198e and a total of
0.172 electrons are transferred to the graphene sheet. This results
in polarized charges around the carbon atom in the graphene.
To explore further insight into the electronic structure changes
of the favored Pd dimer adsorbed graphene system, Figure 5
shows spin-polarized DOS distributed symmetrically for both up
and down spins. The system is found to be metallic with mag-
netic moment completely quenched. It can further be seen that
the states in the energy range from about −4.0 eV to approx-
imately −2.0 eV are primarily contributed by C pz -like states
and the partially from 4d-like orbital states with nearly symmet-
ric contribution in both up and down spins. At nearly −1.25 eV
the C 2p (pz  strongly hybridize with Pd (dx2  −y 2 ) forming 
bond on both majority and minority channels with obvious shape
peaks. The  bond for Pd–Pd (dxy−xy ) dimer position around
−2.0 eV in both majority and minority channel. At the vicinity
of Fermi level the contributions of Pdorbital states is so small in
this case, as such pz states of C completely dominate the region.

4. CONCLUSIONS
The stable geometries, electronic and magnetic properties of low
coverage Pd datom and dimer adsorbed on graphene have been
studied using first principle calculations. As for single Pd adatom,
Fig. 5. The spin-polarized total and projected density of state for the most it is found that single Pdadsorption on top of carbon atom site
stable Pd dimer adsorbed-graphene. is the most stable configuration. The orbital contributions for
C–Pd bond are mainly dominated by C 2pz , and Pd 5s and 4dz2
orbitals. Moreover, the study has revealed that the graphene with
inter-dimer bond length suggests that dimer behaves like two
single Pd atomis semiconductor and non-magnetic. For palladium
adjacent adatoms after adsorption. In addition, Figure 3(b), shows
dimer, it is found that, depending on the configuration of the Pd
charge distributions of the Pd dimer parallel configurations, the
dimer parallel or perpendicular configurations two distinct situ-
weakening of the bond is evidenced by the narrow depreciation ations with respect to magnetic behavior can be realized. The
in electron charge density between the region of palladium atoms parallel configurations where the bonding between Pd and C is
and carbon atom directly below it. The Löwdin charge analy- more strengthened are found to be more stable than the perpen-
sis (see Table I) indicates that, due to hybridization between 4d dicular configurations. Additionally, Pddimer adsorbing on top
orbitals of both Pd atoms and 5s orbitals, the two Pd atoms trans- of two carbon atoms site is the energetically favorable compare
fers the same amount of electron (approximately 048e) to the to the rest of the parallel configurations and is found to be non-
carbon in the graphene sheetand this agrees with the depreciation magnetic. Absent of magnetism results from bonded electrons
of electron density isosurface around the region of contact carbon of Pd-graphene system leaving no unpaired electron. Further-
bond. The rest of the structural parameters for the obtained differ- more, the study also has revealed that, in spite of low coverage
ent palladium dimer configurations are listed in the Table I. It can Pddimer adsorbed graphene the systemis metallic. Additionally,
be seen that the magnetic moment per unit cell in perpendicular the Pd–Pd interaction is much weakened compare to an isolated
configurations is found to change depending on the adsorption Pd dimer with nearly symmetric heights above the adsorption
site, hence induced magnetic moment depends on the adsorp- sites and Pd–C bond mainly dominated by C 2pz , indicating that
tion positions and this is in disagreement with recent reported uniform coating can be attained. This property reveals the pos-
result which shows closely laying values in perpendicular config- sibility of using palladium metal for making contact between
uration adsorption sites.17 Additionally, PT configuration which graphene and electrode. Reasonable magnetic moment is detected
is energetically stable compare to the rest of perpendicular con- for perpendicular Pd configurations depending on the strength of
figurations shows the highest magnetic moment. To have a bet- the Pd-graphene bond. For favored perpendicular configuration
ter account for the enhanced magnetic moment among others, where magnetic moment is most enhanced, the charge distribu-
the bond length for the adsorbed Pd dimer, especially the lower tion reveals a uniform electron charge density around the region
Pd atom directly above the carbon atom in the graphene sheet, of Pd atom and this is mainly caused by the charge transfer
was checked. It can be observed in Table I, that the energetic between the Pd dimer leaving the bonding orbitals with more

5
RESEARCH ARTICLE Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015

deficient electrons. In general, these results demonstrate that the 10. Y. G. Zhou, X. T. Zu, P. Yang, H. Y. Xiao, and F. Gao, J. Phys.: Condens.
graphene electronic and magnetic properties can be effectively Matter 22, 465303 (2010).
11. B. Sanyal, O. Eriksson, U. Jansson, and H. Grennberg, Physical Review B
modified by Pd dimer metal adsorption and this may serve as a 79, 113409 (2009).
potential material in nanodevices applications. 12. N. M. R. Peres, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2673 (2010).
13. M. Hupalo, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Lu, Y. Yao, K. Ho, and M. C. Tringides, Adv.
Acknowledgments: This work is supported by Univer- Mater. 23, 2082 (2011).
14. Y. Yagi, T. M. Briere, M. H. F. Sluiter, V. Kumar, A. A. Farajian, and Y. Kawazoe,
siti Putra Malaysia, Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Physical Review B 69, 075414 (2004).
Malaysia through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) 15. K. T. Chan, J. B. Neaton, and M. L. Cohen, Physical Review B 77, 235430
(Project Code: FRGS/1/11/ST/UPM/02/11). Figure 3 was gener- (2008).
16. A. Z. AlZahrani, Physica B: Condensed Matter 407, 992 (2012).
ated using the XCRYSDEN program.31 17. R. Thapa, D. Sen, M. K. Mitra, and K. K. Chattopadhyay, Physica B: Con-
densed Matter 406, 368 (2011).
18. R. S. Sundaram, C. Gómez-Navarro, K. Balasubramanian, M. Burghard, and
References and Notes K. Kern, Adv. Mater. 20, 3050 (2008).
1. Y. Zhang, Y. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Nature 438, 201 (2005). 19. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Physical Review 136, B864 (1964).
2. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, 20. P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni,
S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Science 306, 666 D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, and I. Dabo, J. Phys.: Condens.
(2004). Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
3. M. Y. Han, B. Özyilmaz, Y. Zhang, and P. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 206805 21. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
(2007). 22. A. M. Rappe, K. M. Rabe, E. Kaxiras, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Physical
4. A. K. Geim, Science 324, 1530 (2009). Review B 44, 13175 (1991).
5. N. Stander, B. Huard, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 026807 23. A. D. Corso, S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, and P. Giannozzi (2008).
(2009). 24. N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, A. De Vita, and M. C. Payne, Phys. Rev. Lett.
6. S. Phark, J. Borme, A. L. Vanegas, M. Corbetta, D. Sander, and J. Kirschner, 82, 3296 (1999).
ACS Nano 5, 8162 (2011). 25. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Physical Review B 13, 5188 (1976).
7. C. Berger, Z. Song, X. Li, X. Wu, N. Brown, C. Naud, D. Mayou, T. Li, J. Hass, 26. Y. Baskin and L. Meyer, Physical Review 100, 544 (1955).
A. N. Marchenkov, E. H. Conrad, P. N. First, and Walt A. de Heer, Science 27. P. O. Löwdin, The Journal of Chemical Physics 18, 365 (1950).
312, 1191 (2006). 28. M. Wu, E. Z. Liu, M. Y. Ge, and J. Z. Jiang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 102505
8. L. Hu, X. Hu, X. Wu, C. Du, Y. Dai, and J. Deng, Physica B: Condensed (2009).
Matter 405, 3337 (2010). 29. M. Wu, E. Z. Liu, and J. Z. Jiang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 082504 (2008).
9. V. C. M. Paulo, F. de B. Mota, J. S. M. Artur, and M. C. de C. Caio, Nanotech- 30. Y. Xie, J.-M. Zhang, and Y.-P. Huo, Physica B: Condensed Matter 406, 4572
nology 21, 115701 (2010). (2011).
31. A. Kokalji, Computer. Mater. Sci. 28, 155 (2003), http://www.xcrysden.org/.

Received: 2 June 2013. Accepted: 29 June 2013.

View publication stats

You might also like