Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/261698252
CITATIONS READS
2 231
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Molecularly imprinted polymers nanofiber: synthesis, characterization and their application for water and waste water treatment View project
Density Functional Study of Cr Atom Adsorption on Hydrogen-Terminated Armchair Boron Nitride Nanoribbons View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Shamsu Abubakar on 17 March 2018.
In this paper, we investigate stable geometries, electronic and magnetic properties of low coverage palladium
(Pd) atom adsorption on graphene using first principles calculations with the generalized gradient approximation.
Calculations show that single Pd atom located at the top of carbon atom is the energetically favorable config-
uration, and is found to be semiconductor and non-magnetic. We also compute the projected density of states
(PDOS) around Fermi level and beyond. It is found that, C-Pd covalent interaction is mainly dominated by 2pz
of C, 5s and 4d like states of Pd. For low coverage stable Pd dimer, the adsorption is characterized by strong
hybridization between the palladium atoms and the two carbon atoms bonded directly to it. A much weakening
of Pd–Pd bond is observed and the C-Pd covalent bonds mainly dominate by 2pz of C orbital indicating that
planar coating can be achieved. Thus, this work reveals that uniform coating of Pd atom can be achieved and
may be useful in transport measurements.
electro-deposition.18 However, there are no prio reports on the space of 15 Å in vertical direction is considered so that inter
electronic structure changes of pure graphene uponparallel Pd adatoms and dimers interactions can be reduced. In the case
dimer adsorption on pure graphene. In view of this, our main of single Pd adsorption on graphene sheet, three high symmet-
objective of this study is to contribute to the understanding of ric sites are considered. The hollow (H) site is at the center of
this effect of adsorption of low coverage palladium atoms on hexagon, the bridge site (B) at the middle point of carbon–carbon
graphene properties. To achieve this goal, we have investigated bond and top (T) site directly above carbon atom as shown in
the various adsorption geometries and then examined the chem- the Figure 1(a). For Pd atoms adsorption on graphene sheet, six
ical electronic structure of the system based on projected den- configurations are employed. Three dimer perpendicular config-
sity of states and charge transfer of the favored configurations. urations with lower atom bonded to graphene sheet at H, B and
As a result of our analysis, we find strong covalent interactions T sites are denoted by PH , PB and PT respectively as shown
between the carbon atom in the graphene structure and the Palla- in Figure (a). Three dimers parallel to graphene sheet for Pd
dium atom. Moreover, the Löwdin’s charge analysis and charge atoms with configurations denoted as RH , having two atoms sit-
density distribution are computed to support our findings. ting above two neighboring H sites, RB with its two atoms sitting
above opposite B sites and RT Having two atoms sitting above
2. CALCULATION METHODOLOGY AND opposite T sites on the same sheets shown in Figure 1(c). The
isolated inter dimer distance is found by optimizing dimer in a
CONVERGENCES
simple cubic cell of (12×12×12 Å) dimension. Only the gamma
We have performed first principles19 calculations based on
points of the BZ are considered during relaxation. To avoid being
density functional theory implemented in the QUANTUM
trapped at meta-stable structures in the structural optimization
ESPRESSO simulation package.20 We used a plane wave basis
process, a series of static calculations are performed. In this pro-
set to expand the wave functions. The electron–electron inter-
cess the adatom is fixed at an adsorption sites with several dis-
action is expressed within generalized gradient approximation
(GGA) and spin polarized GGA as parameterized by Perdew- tances along the line normal to the graphene sheet. The favored
Burkew-Enzerhof21 exchange correlation scheme. The choice of distance from the graphene sheetis obtained from the global min-
GGA is due to the performance in getting ground state proper- imum of the adsorption energy curve of each adsorption site.
ties of the combined metal graphene system. Electron-ion core The stability curvesare adsorption energy versus Pd-graphene
interaction is treated by ultrasoft pseudopotential for C and sheet distances for three sites, H, B and T sites is shown in the
Pd(4d9 5s 1 valence orbitals as in the pseudopotential file) atoms.22 Figure 2. When stable distances for each configuration are found,
All pseudopotentials can be found from the Plane-Wave Self- the relaxation are performed along all the atomic coordinates
Consistent Field(PWSCF) pseudopotential online references.23 but keeping the cell dimension fixed. We used Broyden-Fletcher-
To expand the wave functions, we have used plain-wave basis Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) algorithm for the forces and energy
with the kinetic energy cut-off of 500 eV. For integrals, smearing minimization process. However, after full relaxation, the dimers
is employed to aid convergences and to be specific, Marzari- were found slightly deviate slightly from their original high sym-
Vanderbilt method24 with small Gausian spreading of 0.03 eV metric locations, and the new position shows the nearest possible
was used. For Brillouin zone (BZ) integrations, we sampled 8 × configurations.
8 × 1 set of k-points with the Mankhorst-Pack scheme.25 In mod-
eling graphene sheet, we used 4 × 4 × 1 supercell containing 32
carbon atoms is constructed in a 3-dimensional periodic boundary 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
conditions with 2.46 Å in plane lattice constant which is in agree- In present work, Pd is considered to be adsorbed on graphene
ment with the graphene experimental lattice parameter.26 The sheet at three most stable adsorption sites namely, H sites (center
graphene sheet constructed is then optimized and the inter-atom of hexagon), T site (atom top site) and B site (above mid-point
distance was found to be 1.42 Å. To minimize the interaction of bond top site) as shown in the Figure 1(a). Table I summarizes
between graphene sheet and its neighboring image, a vacuum the details geometric stabilities parameters and magnetic moment
Fig. 1. Possible adsorption sites for Pd atoms on a monolayer graphene and supercell model. (a) Three Pd adatom and dimer (perpendicular) adsorption
sites for with notations; center of hexagon (H), top of carbon atom (T) and bond center (B), (b) most stable Pd adatom adsorption on carbon atom in graphene
sheet named T (c) side view of the adsorbed parallel configuration named RT with two Pd atoms sitting directly above carbon atom in the graphene sheet.
2
Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015 RESEARCH ARTICLE
Table I. Details of the optimized structural properties for Palladium atom and dimer adsorbed on graphene.
Atom Site Eads (eV) h (Å) dMG (Å) dMM (Å) MC−G q (e) qd (e) mMG (B)
Notes: The adsorption energies Eads , the average height of adatom over all carbon atoms hA0 , the averaged nearest neighboring metal adatom carbon bond length dMG , Löwdin total
charge q and valence d orbital charge qd , the data outside the bracket are the charge for lower atom directly bonded to graphene and the values inside the bracket are the result for
upper atom in the perpendicular dimer configurations PH PB and PT respectively whereas the parallel configurations (RH , RB and RT ) have their charges results with both atom directly
bind to graphene at their respective adsorption sites depicted by the subscripts in unit of eV, the inter dimer bond length dMM ; the MC−G bond-graphene sheet angles (degree) and
the magnetic moments mMG of dimer adsorbed on graphene system per unit cell.
3
RESEARCH ARTICLE Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015
Fig. 3. Charge density plots: Scale nr signifying ranges of isodensity values in a.u. (a) Top and side view charge distribution of the most stable Pd atom-
adsorbed graphene configuration. (b) The corresponding top view charge distribution of the most stable for Pd dimer-adsorbed graphene system (c) Side view
of the perpendicular dimer adsorbed on carbon top i.e., PT configuration with white indicating charge accumulation and light pink charge depletions.
It reveals that, in spite of the low coverage single Pd adsorbed, charge is found to be visible in either adatom or carbon atom
the Pd completely destroy the delocalized orbital there by directly below it. Consistent with valence orbital available in the
modifying the electronic structure of graphene layer from semi- pseudopotentials which is stated in Section 2, the states from
metal to a semiconducting material with energy band gap of approximately −4.0 eV to 2.0 eV is partly contributed by 4d
approximately 0.49 eV at the Fermi level. The symmetric distri- orbitals like states and mainly dominated by the C-pz like states
butions of density of states in both spin up and spin down even at with obvious shape peaks within the two regions. Moreover, at
the vicinity of Fermi level further reveals the reasons for the zero the vicinity of Fermi energy, i.e., within approximately −2.0 eV
net magnetic moment in the system. Although charge transfer to −0.24 eV 3d states dominates in both spin up and spin down
is observed between the adatom and the graphene, no polarized states of Pd and partly contributed by pz of C states.
4
Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015 RESEARCH ARTICLE
4. CONCLUSIONS
The stable geometries, electronic and magnetic properties of low
coverage Pd datom and dimer adsorbed on graphene have been
studied using first principle calculations. As for single Pd adatom,
Fig. 5. The spin-polarized total and projected density of state for the most it is found that single Pdadsorption on top of carbon atom site
stable Pd dimer adsorbed-graphene. is the most stable configuration. The orbital contributions for
C–Pd bond are mainly dominated by C 2pz , and Pd 5s and 4dz2
orbitals. Moreover, the study has revealed that the graphene with
inter-dimer bond length suggests that dimer behaves like two
single Pd atomis semiconductor and non-magnetic. For palladium
adjacent adatoms after adsorption. In addition, Figure 3(b), shows
dimer, it is found that, depending on the configuration of the Pd
charge distributions of the Pd dimer parallel configurations, the
dimer parallel or perpendicular configurations two distinct situ-
weakening of the bond is evidenced by the narrow depreciation ations with respect to magnetic behavior can be realized. The
in electron charge density between the region of palladium atoms parallel configurations where the bonding between Pd and C is
and carbon atom directly below it. The Löwdin charge analy- more strengthened are found to be more stable than the perpen-
sis (see Table I) indicates that, due to hybridization between 4d dicular configurations. Additionally, Pddimer adsorbing on top
orbitals of both Pd atoms and 5s orbitals, the two Pd atoms trans- of two carbon atoms site is the energetically favorable compare
fers the same amount of electron (approximately 048e) to the to the rest of the parallel configurations and is found to be non-
carbon in the graphene sheetand this agrees with the depreciation magnetic. Absent of magnetism results from bonded electrons
of electron density isosurface around the region of contact carbon of Pd-graphene system leaving no unpaired electron. Further-
bond. The rest of the structural parameters for the obtained differ- more, the study also has revealed that, in spite of low coverage
ent palladium dimer configurations are listed in the Table I. It can Pddimer adsorbed graphene the systemis metallic. Additionally,
be seen that the magnetic moment per unit cell in perpendicular the Pd–Pd interaction is much weakened compare to an isolated
configurations is found to change depending on the adsorption Pd dimer with nearly symmetric heights above the adsorption
site, hence induced magnetic moment depends on the adsorp- sites and Pd–C bond mainly dominated by C 2pz , indicating that
tion positions and this is in disagreement with recent reported uniform coating can be attained. This property reveals the pos-
result which shows closely laying values in perpendicular config- sibility of using palladium metal for making contact between
uration adsorption sites.17 Additionally, PT configuration which graphene and electrode. Reasonable magnetic moment is detected
is energetically stable compare to the rest of perpendicular con- for perpendicular Pd configurations depending on the strength of
figurations shows the highest magnetic moment. To have a bet- the Pd-graphene bond. For favored perpendicular configuration
ter account for the enhanced magnetic moment among others, where magnetic moment is most enhanced, the charge distribu-
the bond length for the adsorbed Pd dimer, especially the lower tion reveals a uniform electron charge density around the region
Pd atom directly above the carbon atom in the graphene sheet, of Pd atom and this is mainly caused by the charge transfer
was checked. It can be observed in Table I, that the energetic between the Pd dimer leaving the bonding orbitals with more
5
RESEARCH ARTICLE Quantum Matter 4, 1–6, 2015
deficient electrons. In general, these results demonstrate that the 10. Y. G. Zhou, X. T. Zu, P. Yang, H. Y. Xiao, and F. Gao, J. Phys.: Condens.
graphene electronic and magnetic properties can be effectively Matter 22, 465303 (2010).
11. B. Sanyal, O. Eriksson, U. Jansson, and H. Grennberg, Physical Review B
modified by Pd dimer metal adsorption and this may serve as a 79, 113409 (2009).
potential material in nanodevices applications. 12. N. M. R. Peres, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2673 (2010).
13. M. Hupalo, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Lu, Y. Yao, K. Ho, and M. C. Tringides, Adv.
Acknowledgments: This work is supported by Univer- Mater. 23, 2082 (2011).
14. Y. Yagi, T. M. Briere, M. H. F. Sluiter, V. Kumar, A. A. Farajian, and Y. Kawazoe,
siti Putra Malaysia, Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Physical Review B 69, 075414 (2004).
Malaysia through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) 15. K. T. Chan, J. B. Neaton, and M. L. Cohen, Physical Review B 77, 235430
(Project Code: FRGS/1/11/ST/UPM/02/11). Figure 3 was gener- (2008).
16. A. Z. AlZahrani, Physica B: Condensed Matter 407, 992 (2012).
ated using the XCRYSDEN program.31 17. R. Thapa, D. Sen, M. K. Mitra, and K. K. Chattopadhyay, Physica B: Con-
densed Matter 406, 368 (2011).
18. R. S. Sundaram, C. Gómez-Navarro, K. Balasubramanian, M. Burghard, and
References and Notes K. Kern, Adv. Mater. 20, 3050 (2008).
1. Y. Zhang, Y. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Nature 438, 201 (2005). 19. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Physical Review 136, B864 (1964).
2. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, 20. P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni,
S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Science 306, 666 D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, and I. Dabo, J. Phys.: Condens.
(2004). Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
3. M. Y. Han, B. Özyilmaz, Y. Zhang, and P. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 206805 21. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
(2007). 22. A. M. Rappe, K. M. Rabe, E. Kaxiras, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Physical
4. A. K. Geim, Science 324, 1530 (2009). Review B 44, 13175 (1991).
5. N. Stander, B. Huard, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 026807 23. A. D. Corso, S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, and P. Giannozzi (2008).
(2009). 24. N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, A. De Vita, and M. C. Payne, Phys. Rev. Lett.
6. S. Phark, J. Borme, A. L. Vanegas, M. Corbetta, D. Sander, and J. Kirschner, 82, 3296 (1999).
ACS Nano 5, 8162 (2011). 25. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Physical Review B 13, 5188 (1976).
7. C. Berger, Z. Song, X. Li, X. Wu, N. Brown, C. Naud, D. Mayou, T. Li, J. Hass, 26. Y. Baskin and L. Meyer, Physical Review 100, 544 (1955).
A. N. Marchenkov, E. H. Conrad, P. N. First, and Walt A. de Heer, Science 27. P. O. Löwdin, The Journal of Chemical Physics 18, 365 (1950).
312, 1191 (2006). 28. M. Wu, E. Z. Liu, M. Y. Ge, and J. Z. Jiang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 102505
8. L. Hu, X. Hu, X. Wu, C. Du, Y. Dai, and J. Deng, Physica B: Condensed (2009).
Matter 405, 3337 (2010). 29. M. Wu, E. Z. Liu, and J. Z. Jiang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 082504 (2008).
9. V. C. M. Paulo, F. de B. Mota, J. S. M. Artur, and M. C. de C. Caio, Nanotech- 30. Y. Xie, J.-M. Zhang, and Y.-P. Huo, Physica B: Condensed Matter 406, 4572
nology 21, 115701 (2010). (2011).
31. A. Kokalji, Computer. Mater. Sci. 28, 155 (2003), http://www.xcrysden.org/.