Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thesis Old Title: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF TEACHING PRACTICES FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER (ASD)
STUDENTS IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
Thesis New Title: THE TEACHING PROCESS IMPLEMENTED BY NASOM VOCATIONAL INSTRUCTORS ON AUTISM
SPECTRUM DISORDER STUDENTS
1 Need to rewrite esp. the research background Autism Spectrum Disorder is a mental v v
main idea which is not intercorrelated with disorder that may affect young children‘s
problem statement. development, which causes them to behave
Do not use abbrev. in abstract - ASD, abnormally and have difficulty in
NASOM, NVIVO. communication with people in the
community. With the increasing number of
Clear overview and good arrangement in
autism students each year, and with the
abstract should include: Intro/problem recognition of the significance of
background, research problem, method, Vocational Education to autism students,
analysis finding and recommendation. the teaching process should explicitly be
oriented to their unique capabilities. An
effective teaching and learning process for
autism students is crucial for achieving the
learning goals and producing quality
instructors for autism students. This study is
conducted to examine the teaching process
among instructors of vocational education
SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I hereby, have checked and verify that the corrections done are satisfactory.
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I hereby, have checked and verify that the corrections done are satisfactory.
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I hereby, have checked and verify that the corrections done are satisfactory.
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I hereby, have checked and verify that the corrections done are satisfactory.
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
Chapter 3
1 IE The Mixed-method design used in this The mixed method design used in this study 53-55 61-63
research is not clear, not explain specifically is convergent parallel design. Justification
what types of mixed-method exploratory or has also been stated in the study.
explanatory or triangulation. Justification also Qualitative functions have also been
needed to the use of the design. described in the study.
The function of qualitative also not clear,
therefore difficult to determine what kind of
mixed-method design can apply. How the
qualitative become as explanatory? What
explanations related to quantitative part?
2 IE Research operational procedure need to Research operating procedures have been 55 63-64
rewrite clearly. clearly rewritten.
3 IE Population and sampling - should give Population and sampling -have been given a 56-59 64-66
descriptions and justification of research description and justification of the research
population, size population, number of sample population, population size, sample size and
and sampling method for both quantitative sampling methods for quantitative and
and qualitative. Sample size and sampling qualitative.
method for qualitative incorrect. Need to do
some correction.
4 IE The development of Qualitative Instrument Has rewritten the whole 67 72-77
(3.5.2) - Need to rewrite the whole
5 IE The statistical analysis selected for RQ1 and Has been modified in accordance with the 73-75 79-84
RQ2 is not appropriate and inaccurate. Also research question
for RQ3 and RQ4. For RQ5 – need to review
the suitable use of Spearman’s Rho or other
coefficient correlation.
1EE Population and sample: Population and sampling -have been given a 56-59 64-66
a) Institutions involved in this research 9 or description and justification of the research
3?Page 58, why just selected 3 institutions population, population size, sample size and
SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I hereby, have checked and verify that the corrections done are satisfactory.
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date: 30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
involved in this research and how the sample sampling methods for quantitative and
is selected and what sampling technique is qualitative.
used?
b) How many instructor teaching ASD
students in Vocational field in 9 institutions?
There is not clear about the sample selected
involved in this research study. Suggestion:
Create one table the sample size and
respondent involved in this research.
c) For Qualitative study-why 4 instructors
selected and what the criteria to select
instructors involve in this study
d) Synchronize the word of teachers or
instructors that you want to use in this study.
2 EE For pilot test, why the questionnaire were Questionnaires were tested in a group of 65 69-72
tested in the Government School because the teachers that were selected from the
main study focusing in private schools.What researcher at Special Education School
is the same characteristics with the main Taman Maluri where the teacher was selected
because they have the same vocational
respondent of the study
education background with NASOM
instructors (Junyong, 2017).
3 EE For Quantitative data analysis, why use Has been changed to Pearson Correlation in 73 79-84
spearmen rho correlation analysis to answer accordance with the research question
research question 5?
4 EE There is no summary of the chapter 3. A summary of chapter 3 has been added 84-85
Chapter 4
1 IE The demographic data not analyses Demographic data were fully analyzed, 78 86
completely, even those data about it have according to which data were collected
collected
SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I hereby, have checked and verify that the corrections done are satisfactory.
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
2 IE The data obtained for RQ1 and RQ2 were not The data obtained for RQ1 and RQ2 have 79-83 88-105
well described and not answering the RQs. been described. The type of statistics used is
Type of statistic used not appropriate to appropriate for answering the RQ. The table
answering the RQs. Tables which use to used to support the description has also been
changed. The analysis report has been
support the description is not appropriate. The
critically written.
report of analysis not critically written in
The data obtained for RQ3 and RQ4 were
accordance with the PhD level. also modified.
The data obtained for RQ3 and RQ4 also not
suitable and not able to answering the RQs.
3 IE Figure 4.1 cannot be use because it not based Was modified using SEM analysis 109 105-
on relevant data of analysis such as SEM 107
1 EE 4.2.4 and 4.2.5 (Page 93): Shoule be stated the The data obtained for RQ1 and RQ2 have 79-108 88-105
mastery level of teaching practices… is based been described. The type of statistics used is
on what range or standard. appropriate for answering the RQ. The table
- 4.2.6: Analysis, results and interpretation of used to support the description has also been
data need to be review. There is a significant changed. The analysis report has been
critically written.
misinterpretation of value (Page 102- The data obtained for RQ3 and RQ4 were
108).Below <0.05 is significant also modified.
2 EE - Figure 4.1.Interim Model of Conceptual Was modified using SEM analysis 109 105-
Framework ………. What analysis is used to 107
verify it’s as a model of conceptual
framework.
Chapter 5
1 IE Page 126 to 134...unknown the purpose of the The entire discussion in this Chapter has 126-134 129-
discussion. been rewritten 140
The whole style of writing in this chapter is
poor and difficult to understand. Data analysis
is confused with the summary of research
finding
SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I hereby, have checked and verify that the corrections done are satisfactory.
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021
LIST OF CORRECTIONS
2 IE The conclusion is not relevant with finding of The conclusions were altered and rewritten in 147-151 143-
the studied. relation to the findings studied. 145
The overall of the recommendations of the The entire proposed study proposal has been
study presented are not appropriate and revised and rewritten.
unreasonable.
1 EE - 5.2.4: The discussion needs to be elaborated The discussion has been modified and 126-134 129-
further. It is suggested that the results of the elaborated further. The results of the 140
interview can be included and discussed in interviews are included and discussed in this
this discussion section. chapter.
- 5.2.5: The discussion for this objective need
to review because there is a significant
misinterpretation of value from the analysis
result
- 5.2.5 and 5.2.6: Title of discussion need to
be align with the objectives of the research.
SUPERVISOR DECLARATION
I hereby, have checked and verify that the corrections done are satisfactory.
Signature:
Official Stamp:
Date:
30.8.2021