RPH201 Finals Requirement

Instructions:
Preparation:

1. Choose your site: Select a museum or historical location relevant to your current
studies in Philippine history. Consider topics like pre-colonial societies, Spanish
colonization, the independence movement, or contemporary issues. Look for
sites with exhibits, artifacts, or stories that resonate with your interests.
2. Set your learning goals: Before your visit, identify specific aspects of history you
want to explore further. Is it understanding daily life in a certain era, witnessing
the impact of a historical event, or appreciating the contributions of a renowned
figure? Having clear goals will guide your observations and ensure a focused
report.
3. Research beforehand: Do some background research on the site you'll visit.
Familiarize yourself with its history, key exhibits, and potential connections to
your course material. This helps you engage with the site more meaningfully and
ask informed questions.

During your visit:

1. Become an active observer: Don't simply walk through exhibits passively. Use
your senses to absorb the details: look at artifacts closely, listen to audio guides
or historical reenactments, and touch interactive displays if allowed. Pay attention
to the atmosphere and imagine yourself transported to the past.
2. Take notes and pictures: Document your observations, feelings, and questions
that arise during your visit. Jot down key information about exhibits, quotes from
guides, or personal responses to what you see. Photos can help jog your
memory later and add visual interest to your report.
3. Ask questions: Don't hesitate to engage with museum staff, historical reenactors,
or fellow visitors. Their insights and perspectives can deepen your understanding
and offer unique viewpoints.

Writing your report:

 1. Structure your narrative: Start with a strong introduction that sets the scene and
highlights the historical significance of the site. Use vivid descriptions and
sensory details to transport your reader to the location.
2. Weave in your personal experience: Don't just report facts; share your
reflections, observations, and reactions to what you saw and learned. Connect
your experience to your "Readings in Philippine History" course by mentioning
relevant historical figures, events, or concepts.
3. Analyze and interpret: Go beyond simply describing exhibits. Analyze what they
reveal about the past, how they represent historical narratives, and what
message they convey. Draw connections between the site and broader historical
themes or contemporary issues.
4. End with a lasting impression: Conclude your report by summarizing your key
takeaways and the lasting impact of your visit. Did it change your perspective on
history? How can these learnings be applied to the present?
5. Proofread and edit: Ensure your report is well-written, grammatically correct, and
adheres to any specific formatting guidelines provided by your instructor.
6. Use APA Style formatting when writing your paper. Refrain from using chatbots
or AI-generator when writing your paper. That is a case of plagiarism and we
don’t tolerate that here in our college.

Bonus tips:

• Use multimedia elements like photos, videos, or sketches to enhance your report
and bring your experience to life.
• Interview people at the site, like museum staff or local residents, to capture
additional perspectives and stories.
• Consider the ethical implications of representing historical narratives and respect
different viewpoints and sensitivities.

Grading Rubric for Narrative Report of Museum/Historical

Site Visit (100 Points)
Content (40 points)

• Specificity and Relevance (10 points):

 o Choice of site demonstrates relevance to current readings in Philippine
history (5 points).
o Clear focus on specific historical themes or topics explored during the visit
(5 points).
• Historical Accuracy and Analysis (15 points):
o Accurate representation of historical events, figures, and contexts (5
points).
o Critical analysis and interpretation of exhibits and historical narratives (5
points).
o Connection of observed details to broader historical themes and trends (5
points).
• Personal Connections and Reflections (10 points):
o Meaningful insights and personal reactions to the historical experience (5
points).
o Reflections on how the visit impacted your understanding of Philippine
history (5 points).
• Originality and Creativity (5 points):
o Unique perspective or angle taken on the subject matter (3 points).
o Incorporation of multimedia elements (e.g., photos, videos) to enhance the
report (2 points).

Organization and Structure (25 points)

• Clarity and Cohesion (10 points):

o Logical flow of ideas and smooth transitions between sections (5 points).
o Effective use of narrative structure (introduction, body, conclusion) (5
points).
• Evidence of Preparation (5 points):
o Clear understanding of the historical context and site background (3
points).
o Specific learning goals for the visit identified and incorporated (2 points).
• Engaging Narrative (10 points):
o Vivid descriptions and sensory details that bring the historical experience
to life (5 points).
o Varied sentence structure and engaging writing style (5 points).
Language and Mechanics (20 points)

• Grammar and Mechanics (10 points):

o Proper use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling (5 points).
o Sentence clarity and conciseness (5 points).
• Word Choice and Style (5 points):
o Precise and evocative language that reflects the historical context (3
points).
o Appropriate academic tone and formality (2 points).
• Citation and Referencing (5 points):
o Accurate and consistent citation of sources (e.g., museum
information, historical references) (3 points).
o Proper formatting of bibliography or references (2 points).

Presentation and Formatting (15 points)

• Readability and Visual Appeal (10 points):

o Clear and organized formatting (e.g., headings, spacing, font) (5 points).
o Integration of multimedia elements (if applicable) enhances understanding
(5 points).
• Professionalism and Neatness (5 points):
o Absence of typos, grammatical errors, and formatting inconsistencies (3
points).
o Overall presentation contributes to a positive impression (2 points).