Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
proof-of-authority based test network called Rinkeby Programmatically interfacing geth nodes
As a developer, sooner rather than later you'll want to
which is operated by members of the community. start
interacting with geth and the Ethereum network via
$ geth --rinkeby console your
own programs and not manually through the console.
Full node on the Ropsten test network To aid
this, geth has built-in support for a JSON-RPC based
In addition to Görli and Rinkeby, Geth also supports APIs
(standard APIs and geth specific APIs). These can be
the ancient Ropsten testnet. The Ropsten test network exposed
via HTTP, WebSockets and IPC (UNIX sockets on
is based on the Ethash proof-of-work consensus UNIX based
algorithm.
platforms, and named pipes on Windows).
As such, it has certain extra overhead and is more The IPC interface is enabled by default and exposes
susceptible all the
APIs supported by geth, whereas the HTTP and WS
to reorganization attacks due to the network's low interfaces
difficulty/security. need to manually be enabled and only expose a
subset of APIs
due to security reasons. These can be turned on/off
and
configured as you'd expect. HTTP based JSON-RPC
API
options:
(default: localhost)
admin,debug,eth,miner,net,personal,shh,txpoo
l,web3)
Canada
Canada has a proactive stance towards
cryptocurrencies. It became first country to approve
Bitcoin exchange trading fund (ETF) in February
2021.Additionally, the Canadian Securities
Japan virtual currencies and those who are engaged in
Japan considers cryptocurrency as a legal property such activities are doing it at their own risk.
under the payment services act (PSA). Crypto Concerning the increase in valuation of virtual
exchanges in country must register with Financial currencies and the massive growth of Initial Coin
Services Agency (FSA) and comply with AML and Offering, the RBI recalled its warning issued in 2013
CFT obligations. Japan treats trading gains & 2017 Press Release via press release dated
generated from cryptocurrency as December 05, 2017.
“miscellaneous income” and taxes investors
accordingly. Despite issuing various press releases, the crypto
market in India was rapidly growing. This led to RBI
Australia issuing the RBI Circular thereby prohibiting all its
Australia classifies cryptocurrency as a legal regulated entities to deal in any kind of virtual
property which makes them subject to capital gains currency or provide any service related to it. The
tax. Exchanges are free to operate in the country, entities who were engaged in such services were
provided that they register with the Australian asked to exit within 03 months of the RBI Circular.
Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre The RBI Circular indirectly impacted all crypto
(AUSTRAC) and meet specific AML/CTF traders and the private crypto exchanges as they
obligations. In 2019, the Australian Securities and faced a lot of difficulty in doing crypto business in
Investments Commission (ASIC) introduced India. The RBI Circular also made it difficult for the
regulatory requirements for initial coin offerings crypto traders to convert the virtual currency into
(ICOs) and banned exchanges offering privacy fiat currency. All these hitches led to the filing of a
coins. petition before the Supreme Court thereby urging to
strike down the RBI Circular. As the proceedings
were going on in the Supreme Court, the high- level
India Inter Ministerial Committee ("IMC") as constituted
Crypto currencies in India have always held the 'grey by the Department of Economic Affairs
area' status, there being no regulation or law so far.
Even after investments being made at the speed of
light, there seems to be no authoritative clarity on the
same. The Government of India had invited
suggestions on 22nd May, 2017 upto 30th July,
2017, whether to regulate, ban or self-regulate the
crypto currencies.
The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Consequently, the said transaction is leviable to
Digital Currency Bill, 2021 (“New Bill’ 2021”): GST. The subsequent question is whether the
same should be classifiable as goods or services.
We understand, cryptocurrency is an intangible
The New Bill’2021 has been introduced with an aim asset. Although, till date there is no clarity on
to create a facilitative framework for creation of the GST on cryptocurrency by Government whether
official digital currency to be issued by the Reserve same is classifiable as goods or services. Thus, an
Bank of India. The Bill also seeks to prohibit all private analysis is made based on similar intangible
cryptocurrencies in India; however, it allows for assets.
certain exceptions to promote the underlying
technology of cryptocurrency and its uses. Cryptocurrency `mining' will be treated as a supply
of service since it generates cryptocurrency and
The purpose of creating a digital currency is to involves rewards and transaction fees. Tax will be
provide significant benefits, such as reduced collected from the miner on transaction fees or
dependency on cash, higher seigniorage due to reward. If the value of the reward exceeds INR
lower transaction costs and reduced settlement 20 lakh, individual miners will need to register
risk. The new digital currency would also possibly themselves under the Goods and Services Tax
lead to a more robust, efficient, trusted, regulated (GST).
and legal tender-based payments option. The
intention of the government has shifted earlier from
outright banning to regulating the same. It may be
very well inferred that the crypto industry is awaiting
a positive regulation that may permit investing and
trading in crypto with certain restrictions. However,
the Indian government listed this new bill to be
tabled in the winter session of the Parliament, but
no movement has not taken place as of now.
Integrated GST would be applicable for transactions Peer to Peer exchanges are governed and
conducted beyond the Indian territory and would be handled by a software. These exchanges allow
considered as import or export of goods. IGST will the participants to directly participate in exchanges
be levied on cross-border supplies. Also, the without involvement of any trusted third party to
commission on the fees charged by the crypto practice all trades. Regular cryptocurrency
currency exchanges is likely to be taxed at 18% in exchanges are companies which serve as a
the absence of any express clarification from the medium between their customers and avail a profit
Government of India. by collecting fees. Contrarily, the communication
between counterparties on peer-to-peer exchanges
are regulated solely by pre-programmed software, with
no demand of human intervention. This kind of
approach has both a number of advantages as well
as downsides. Peer to peer network actually prevents
double spending. It has no central authority and is
Import/Export transactions in crypto currencies: completely decentralised. Overall, P2P
cryptocurrency exchanges are clear examples of
Transactions in FEMA are categorized as decentralization philosophy.
'Current account transactions' and 'Capital
account transactions'. First, we have to analyse
current account transactions defined under FEMA
(Section 2(j)). A "current account transaction"
means "a transaction other than a capital account
transaction and without prejudice to the generality
of the foregoing such transactions include: