Amhara National Regional State

South Gondar Zone Wereta City

Administration

Asset management plan

Prepared by Wereta UIIDP Team

August, 2014 E.C

Wereta, Ethiopia
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1

1. Wereta City Profile ........................................................................................................................... 2

1.1 Background Information ............................................................................................................ 2

1.1.1 Location of the Town .................................................................................................... 2

1.1.2 Establishment History of the Town .............................................................................. 3
1.1.3 Municipal Physical Infrastructures and Other Services .............................................. 4
1.1.4 Topography and Climatic Condition ............................................................................ 5
1.1.5 Economic Bases of the Town ....................................................................................... 6
1.1.6 Land Use/Land Cover ................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Objective of the Asset Management Plan Report .................................................................... 7

1.2.1 General objective ........................................................................................................... 7

1.2.2 Specific objective for asset management plan ............................................................. 7
1.3 Scope of the Plan ........................................................................................................................ 7

1.4 The Expected Out Comes .......................................................................................................... 8

2. Step-1: BUILD THE GIS PROJECT AND THE DATA MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE ...... 9

2.1 The Geospatial Data of Wereta City ......................................................................................... 9

2.2 Establishing of a GIS project................................................................................................... 10

2.3 The difference between Data and Information ....................................................................... 10

2.4 Defining the relationship between Spatial and Attribute Data .............................................. 11

2.5 The Backdrop Image of the AMP ........................................................................................... 11

2.6 The Geo-Database Structure.................................................................................................... 13

2.7 Creating Tabular Database Structure. ..................................................................................... 17

2.8 The Computer Directory Management Structure................................................................... 19

3. Step-2: BUILDING THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND THE ASSET

MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE ........................................................................................................... 21

3.1 The City's Institutional Framework ........................................................................................ 21

3.2 Organization of the team ......................................................................................................... 21

I
 3.3 Responsibilities of the AMP Unit ........................................................................................... 22

3.4 Departmental Responsibility for the AMP in each asset category........................................ 23

3.5 Definition of Infrastructure Categories and Sub-categories .................................................. 24

3.6 The Structure of the Identifier System .................................................................................... 25

3.7 The List of Codes Used for the First Block of the Identifiers ............................................... 26

3.8 Establishing the GIS Operating Environment for the AMP .................................................. 27

4. STEP-3: INVENTORY OF INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS ...................................................... 30

4.1 The Movement Network .......................................................................................................... 30

4.1.1 Road network ............................................................................................................... 30

4.1.2 Pedestrian Walkways .................................................................................................. 32
4.1.3 Road Structures............................................................................................................ 33
4.1.4 Street Light................................................................................................................... 33
4.1.5 Machinery and Vehicles.............................................................................................. 35
4.2 Water Supply Network ............................................................................................................ 35

4.3 Environmental Services ........................................................................................................... 37

4.3.1 The Drainage Network ................................................................................................ 37

4.3.2 Inventory of Liquid Waste system and sanitation ..................................................... 37
4.3.3 Inventory of Solid Waste Management...................................................................... 38
4.3.4 Inventory of Urban Greenery...................................................................................... 39
4.4 Social and Economic Services ................................................................................................ 39

4.4.1 Inventory of Administration Facilities ....................................................................... 39

4.4.2 Inventory of Educational Facilities ............................................................................ 41
4.4.3 Inventory of Health Facilities ..................................................................................... 42
4.4.4 Inventory of Youth Centre‘s ....................................................................................... 43
4.4.5 Inventory of MSE Facilities ........................................................................................ 43
4.4.6 Inventory of Housing Facilities .................................................................................. 44
4.4.7 Inventory of Abattoir Facility ..................................................................................... 45
4.4.8 Inventory of Other Municipal Facilities..................................................................... 46
5. Step-4: ASSESS THE CONDITION OF ASSETS ...................................................................... 47

5.1 Condition Assessment Results for Movement Network ........................................................ 52

5.1.1 Condition Assessment for Road Asset ....................................................................... 52

5.1.2 Condition Assessment for Road Structures ............................................................... 54

II
 5.1.3 Condition Result of Pedestrian Walkway .................................................................. 55
5.1.4 Condition Result ofStreet Lights ................................................................................ 55
5.2 Condition Assessment for Water Supply................................................................................ 55

5.3 Condition Assessment for Environmental Services ............................................................... 56

5.3.1 Condition Assessment for Drainage ........................................................................... 56

5.3.2 Condition Assessment of Sanitation .......................................................................... 57
5.3.3 Condition Assessment of Solid Waste Management ................................................ 59
5.3.4 Condition Assessment of Urban Greenery ................................................................ 59
5.4 Condition Assessment of Social and Economic Services ..................................................... 60

5.4.1 Condition Assessment of Administration Facilities .................................................. 60

5.4.2 Condition Assessment of Educational Facilities ....................................................... 62
5.4.3 Condition Assessment of Health Facilities ................................................................ 63
5.4.4 Condition Assessment of Youth Centers ................................................................... 64
5.4.5 Condition Assessment of MSE Facilities .................................................................. 65
5.4.6 Condition Assessment of Housing Facilities ............................................................. 66
5.4.7 Condition Assessment of Abattoir Facility ................................................................ 67
5.4.8 Condition Assessment of Other Municipal Facilities ............................................... 68
6. Step-5: DEVELOP A MAINTENANCE BUDGET GUIDE FOR EACH ASSET ................... 70

6.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 70

6.2 Determining the Maintenance Types ...................................................................................... 70

6.3 Maintenance Rate ..................................................................................................................... 71

6.4 Proportion of the Asset to be maintained ............................................................................... 74

6.5 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Need of the Movement Network....................................... 74

6.6 Routine and Periodic Maintenance Budget Forecast for Movement Network .................... 74

6.6.1 Road Surfacing ............................................................................................................ 74

6.6.2 Pedestrian Walkway .................................................................................................... 76
6.6.3 Culverts ........................................................................................................................ 76
6.6.4 Street Light................................................................................................................... 76
6.7 Maintenance Deficit of the Movement Network Assets........................................................ 77

6.8 Budget Estimate to Eliminate Maintenance Deficit of the Movement Network Assets ..... 78

6.8.1 Maintenance Deficit of Road Surfacing..................................................................... 78

6.8.2 Maintenance Deficit Road Structures ........................................................................ 80
6.8.3 Maintenance Summary of Movement Network ........................................................ 81

III
 6.9 Rehabilitation of the Movement Network Assets .................................................................. 81

6.9.1 Rehabilitation of Road Surfacing ............................................................................... 81

6.9.2 Rehabilitation of Road Structures .............................................................................. 82
6.10 Maintaining Water Supply Network ................................................................................... 83

6.10.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 83

6.10.2 Maintenance Forecast for Above Ground Water Supply Network Assets .............. 83
6.10.3 Maintenance Forecast for Below Ground Water Supply Network Assets .............. 83
6.11 Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Assets in Environmental Activity Area.................... 84

6.11.1 Routine and Periodic Maintenance Activities for Drainage Networks .................... 84
6.11.2 Routine and Periodic Maintenance Activities for Sanitation.................................... 85
6.11.3 Maintenance Deficits of Drainage Networks............................................................. 85
6.11.4 Maintenance Deficits of Sanitation ............................................................................ 86
6.11.5 Maintenance Deficits of Solid Waste System & Sanitations.................................... 87
6.11.6 Maintenance Deficits of, Greenery, and Street-Side Greenery ................................ 87
6.12 Maintenance of Assets in Social and Economic Activity Area......................................... 88

6.12.1 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Social and Economic Service Buildings ..... 88
6.12.2 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Health Service Buildings ............................. 89
6.12.3 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of School Buildings .......................................... 89
6.12.4 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Administrative Buildings ............................. 89
6.12.5 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Youth center Buildings ................................ 90
6.12.6 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of MSE Buildings ............................................. 90
6.12.7 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Housing Buildings ........................................ 91
6.12.8 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Other Municipal Facility.............................. 91
6.12.9 Maintenance Deficit of Health Buildings .................................................................. 91
6.12.10 Maintenance Deficit of Education school Buildings................................................. 92
6.12.11 Maintenance Deficit of Administrative Buildings .................................................... 92
6.12.12 Maintenance Deficit of Youth center Buildings ........................................................ 93
6.12.13 Maintenance Deficit of MSE Buildings ..................................................................... 94
6.12.14 Maintenance Deficit of Other municipal facility....................................................... 94
6.12.15 Maintenance Deficit of Abiator facility .................................................................... 94
6.12.16 Maintenance Deficit of Housing Facility .................................................................. 95
6.12.17 Maintaining and Repairing Machineries and Vehicles ............................................. 95
6.13 Maintenance Summary ........................................................................................................ 96

6.14 Rehabilitation Summary ...................................................................................................... 98

7. Step 6: COSTING, VALUING, THE EXISTING ASSET BASE & ITS DEFICIT................100

7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................100

IV
 7.2 Building List of Rates for New Assets Provision ................................................................100

7.3 Summary of Replacement Cost and Residual Value of Assets by Strategic Activity Area
103

7.4 Current Replacement Cost and Residual Value of the Movement Network Assets ..........105

7.4.1 Road Surface .............................................................................................................. 105

7.4.2 Walkway .................................................................................................................... 106
7.4.3 Road Structures.......................................................................................................... 107
7.4.4 Street Lights ............................................................................................................... 107
7.5 Current Replacement Cost and Residual Value of Water Supply Network .......................108

7.6 Current Replacement Cost and Residual Value of Environmental Activity Area .............110

7.7 Current Replacement Cost of Social and Economic Activity Area and Supporting Services
111

8. STEP 7: COST, PRIORITIZE, NEW WORK PROJECTS WITHIN THE CIP PROCESS ...114

8.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................114

8.2 Unit Rates for New Works ....................................................................................................114

8.3 Community Need Assessment ..............................................................................................114

8.4 Budgetary Requirement for Infrastructure Rehabilitation ...................................................115

8.5 The Proposed New Work Projects Organized by Strategic Activity Area .........................115

8.6 The Proposed New Work Projects (Rehabilitation Projects) ..............................................123

8.7 Evaluating the Proposed New Works ...................................................................................123

8.7.1 Socioeconomic Objectives and Benefits .................................................................. 123

8.7.2 Environmental Consideration ................................................................................... 123
8.7.3 Financial Consideration ............................................................................................ 124
8.8 Prioritize the New Works Projects by Strategic Activity Area ...........................................125

9. STEP :-8 BUILD THE MAINTENANCE PLAN ......................................................................133

9.1 General ....................................................................................................................................133

9.2 The Maintenance Budget for Routine and Periodic Maintenance Activities .....................133

9.3 Maintenance Deficit Summary..............................................................................................134

V
 9.4 Prioritizingthe Budget for Maintenance Deficit Reduction.................................................136

9.4.1 MaintenanceActivity of Movement Network Assets .............................................. 136

9.4.2 Maintenance Activity of Water Supply Network Assets ........................................ 138
9.4.3 MaintenanceActivity of Environmental Activity Area Assets ............................... 138
9.4.4 Maintenance Activity of Social and Economic Activity Assets............................. 138
9.4.5 Prioritized Movement Network Asset Maintenance ............................................... 139
9.4.6 Prioritized Environmental Activity Area Maintenance........................................... 139
9.5 Priority Rating to the Maintenance Activities ......................................................................140

9.6 Three years‘ maintenance budget..........................................................................................140

9.7 Projects Proposed for Maintenance.......................................................................................142

9.8 Summary of Maintenance Budget.........................................................................................142

10. Step 9: CONVERT THE NEW WORKS PROJECTS AND THE MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES BUDGETS TO 3-YEAR ROLLING PROGRAM......................................................144

10.1 Three Years Rolling Program for New Works Projects ..................................................144

10.2 The 3-Year Rolling Program for Maintenance Projects ..................................................151

11. Step 10: MANAGE THE TRANSITION OF ALL COMPLETED NEW WORKS AND
MAINTENANCE PROJECTS ACROSS TO THE EXISTING ASSETS DATABASES ..............153

11.1 Build the Implementation schedule for New Work Projects for Year-1 ........................153

11.2 Monthly Schedule of Maintenance Deficit Activities for the Year 2015 .......................160

11.3 Monthly Schedule of Maintenance Deficit Activities for the Year 2014 .......................166

11.4 Build a Schedule of Completed Activities against Target for New works in AMP Year-2
168

VI
 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1: EXAMPLE OF TABULAR DATABASE FOR ROAD NETWORK CATEGORY AND SUB-CATEGORY
................................................................................................................................................................................. 18
TABLE 2: THE DIRECTORY, FOLDERS, FILES AND THEIR PURPOSES IS SHOWN BELOW ON THE TABLE.
................................................................................................................................................................................. 20
TABLE 3: MEMBERS OF THE AMP TASK TEAM ..................................................................................................... 22
TABLE 4: CATEGORY OF INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET AND RESPONSIBLE BODY IN THE CITY`S
ORGANOGRAM. ................................................................................................................................................... 23
TABLE 5: ALLOCATION OF CATEGORIES OF PHYSICAL ASSETS TO THE FOUR STRATEGIC ACTIVITY
AREAS .................................................................................................................................................................... 24
TABLE 6: LIST OF CATEGORY AND FEATURE CLASS CODES............................................................................ 26
TABLE 7: SUMMARY INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR THE ROAD ASSET CATEGORY ................................. 31
TABLE 8: SUMMARY INFORMATION FOR PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS............................................................. 32
TABLE 9: ROADS STRUCTURES BY ROAD CLASSIFICATION. ............................................................................ 33
TABLE 10: DISTRIBUTION OF STREET LIGHT BY TYPE ....................................................................................... 33
TABLE 11: STREET LIGHTS BY ROAD HIERARCHY .............................................................................................. 33
TABLE 12: LIST OF MACHINERIES AND VEHICLES .............................................................................................. 35
TABLE 13: BREAKDOWN OF THE WATER SUPPLY NETWORK BY FEATURE CLASS.................................... 36
TABLE 14: DRAINAGE LINE FEATURE CLASS BY ROAD HIERARCHY. ............................................................ 37
TABLE 15: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF SANITATION FACILITIES..................................................... 37
TABLE 16: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES ..................... 39
TABLE 17: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF URBAN GREENERY. .............................................................. 39
TABLE 18: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES .......................................... 40
TABLE 19: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ................................................ 41
TABLE 20: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF HEALTH FACILITIES ............................................................. 42
TABLE 21: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF YOUTH CENTRE‘S ................................................................. 43
TABLE 22: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF MSE FACILITIES .................................................................... 44
TABLE 23: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF HOUSING FACILITIES. .......................................................... 45
TABLE 24: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF ABATTOIR FACILITY ............................................................ 45
TABLE 25: INVENTORY RESULT SUMMARY OF OTHER MUNICIPAL FACILITIES ........................................ 46
TABLE 26 POINT CONDITION INDICATOR FOR POINT FEATURE ASSETS ...................................................... 47
TABLE 27 CONDITION INDICATOR TABLE FOR POINT FEATURE ASSETS: MECHANICAL FEATURES. ... 47
TABLE 28 CONDITION INDICATOR TABLE FOR POINT FEATURE ASSETS: STRUCTURAL FEATURES .... 47
TABLE 29CONDITION INDICATOR TABLE FOR POINT FEATURE ASSETS: VEHICLES PLANT AND
MACHINERY ......................................................................................................................................................... 48
TABLE 30METHOD OF MEASUREMENT OF DETERIORATION TYPES FOR ASPHALT ROADS .................... 48
TABLE 31METHOD OF MEASUREMENT OF DETERIORATION TYPES FOR COBBLESTONE ROADS.......... 48
TABLE 32METHOD OF MEASUREMENT OF DETERIORATION TYPES FOR GRAVEL & RED-ASH ROADS 49
TABLE 33METHOD OF MEASUREMENT OF DETERIORATION TYPES FOR COMPACTED EARTH ROADS49
TABLE 34 CONDITION INDICATOR TABLE FOR LINEAR FEATURE ASSETS: ROADS, CYCLE PATHS,
FOOTPATHS, PAVED AREAS AND ROUNDABOUTS – ALL ROAD SURFACE TYPES ............................ 49
TABLE 35 CONDITION INDICATOR TABLE FOR LINEAR FEATURE ASSETS: COBBLESTONE ROAD
EDGING.................................................................................................................................................................. 49
TABLE 36METHOD OF MEASUREMENT OF DETERIORATION TYPES FOR MASONRY DRAINS
(CHANNELS) ......................................................................................................................................................... 50
TABLE 37CONDITION INDICATOR TABLE FOR LINEAR FEATURE ASSETS: DRAINAGE CHANNELS....... 50

VII
TABLE 38GENERAL CONDITION INDICATOR FOR WATER MAINS................................................................... 50
TABLE 39A CONDITION INDICATOR FOR WATER MAINS BASED UPON THE FREQUENCY OF PIPE
FAILURES .............................................................................................................................................................. 50
TABLE 40 PHYSICAL CONDITION INDICATOR FOR POLYGON FEATURES: RIVERS .................................... 51
TABLE 41 GENERAL CONDITION INDICATOR FOR POLYGON FEATURES: NATURAL FEATURES;
GREENERY; OPEN SPACES; WATER BODIES ................................................................................................ 51
TABLE 42CONDITION INDICATOR TABLE FOR POLYGON FEATURE ASSETS: BRIDGES; CULVERTS;
RESERVOIRS (ADAPTED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES) ......... 51
TABLE 43CONDITION INDICATOR TABLE FOR POLYGON FEATURE ASSETS: BUILDINGS AND
FACILITIES............................................................................................................................................................ 52
TABLE 44 ROAD FEATURE CLASS BY CONDITION............................................................................................... 53
TABLE 45: ROAD STRUCTURES CONDITION ASSESSMENT ............................................................................... 54
TABLE 46: CONDITION ASSESSMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY .............................................................. 55
TABLE 47: STREET LIGHTS BY ROAD HIERARCHY .............................................................................................. 55
TABLE 48: WATER LINE CONDITION ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................. 56
TABLE 49: SURFACE DRAINAGE CONDITION ASSESSMENT.............................................................................. 56
TABLE 50: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF SANITATION FACILITIES ........................................... 57
TABLE 51: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES ........... 59
TABLE 52 CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF URBAN GREENERY....................................................... 59
TABLE 53 CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES .................................. 60
TABLE 54: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ....................................... 62
TABLE 55: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF HEALTH FACILITIES ................................................... 63
TABLE 56 CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF YOUTH CENTERS. ......................................................... 64
TABLE 57: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF MSE FACILITIES. .......................................................... 65
TABLE 58: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF HOUSING FACILITIES.................................................. 66
TABLE 59: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF ABATTOIR FACILITY. ................................................. 67
TABLE 60: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF OTHER MUNICIPAL FACILITIES. .............................. 68
TABLE 61: MAINTENANCE RATE FOR THE MOVEMENT NETWORK – ROAD SURFACE .............................. 72
TABLE 62: - MAINTENANCE RATE FOR DIFFERENT DETERIORATION TYPES – WALKWAY ..................... 72
TABLE 63: - MAINTENANCE RATE FOR DIFFERENT DETERIORATION TYPES – ROAD STRUCTURES ..... 72
TABLE 64: MAINTENANCE RATE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIC ACTIVITY AREA............................ 73
TABLE 65: MAINTENANCE RATE FOR WATER SUPPLY NETWORK ASSET .................................................... 73
TABLE 66: MAINTENANCE RATE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AREAS AND SUPPORTING
SERVICES. ............................................................................................................................................................. 74
TABLE 67: ROUTINE AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE BUDGET FOR THE ROAD ........................................... 75
TABLE 68 ROUTINE AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE NEED OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS ........................ 76
TABLE 69: ROUTINE AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE NEED OF STREET LIGHT ............................................ 77
TABLE 70: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR DETERIORATED ASPHALT ROAD ...................... 77
TABLE 71: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR DETERIORATED COBBLESTONE ROAD ............ 77
TABLE 72: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR DETERIORATED RED ASH ROADS ..................... 78
TABLE 73: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF ROAD SURFACING ............................................................................... 78
TABLE 74: MAINTENANCE DEFICITS OF BRIDGES AND CULVERTS ................................................................ 81
TABLE 75: MAINTENANCE SUMMARY OF MOVEMENT NETWORK ................................................................. 81
TABLE 76: REHABILITATION REQUIREMENT OF MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSETS-ROAD ......................... 82
TABLE 77: REHABILITATION REQUIREMENT OF MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSETS-ROAD STRUCTURES
................................................................................................................................................................................. 82
TABLE 78 MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ABOVE GROUND WATER NETWORK ASSETS .............. 83
TABLE 79: FORECASTED MAINTENANCE BUDGET FOR BELOW GROUND WATER LINES......................... 84
TABLE 80: ROUTINE AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE BUDGET ESTIMATE FOR DRAINAGE NETWORK . 85

VIII
TABLE 81: ROUTINE AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE BUDGET ESTIMATE FOR TOILETS........................... 85
TABLE 82: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT FOR DRAINAGE NETWORK ...................................................................... 86
TABLE 83: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT FOR SANITATION ....................................................................................... 87
TABLE 84: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT FOR TEMPORARY SOLID WASTE SITE .................................................. 87
TABLE 85: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT FOR GREENERY AND STREET SIDE GREENERY ................................. 88
TABLE 86: REHABILITATION OF DRAINAGE NETWORK..................................................................................... 88
TABLE 87: REHABILITATION OF TEMPORARY SOLID WASTE SITE ................................................................. 88
TABLE 88: ROUTINE AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE OF HEALTH SERVICE BUILDINGS ........................... 89
TABLE 89: PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE NEED OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS ....................................................... 89
TABLE 90: PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES ................................................ 90
TABLE 91: PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF YOUTH CENTER BUILDINGS .................................................... 90
TABLE 92: PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF MSE BUILDINGS .......................................................................... 90
TABLE 93: PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF HOUSING BUILDINGS................................................................. 91
TABLE 94: PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF OTHER MUNICIPAL FACILITY.................................................. 91
TABLE 95: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF HEALTH BUILDINGS ............................................................................ 91
TABLE 96: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF EDUCATION SCHOOL BUILDINGS .................................................... 92
TABLE 97: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS ......................................................... 92
TABLE 98: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF YOUTH CENTRE BUILDINGS ............................................................. 93
TABLE 99: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF MSE BUILDINGS.................................................................................... 94
TABLE 100: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF OTHER MUNICIPAL FACILITY ......................................................... 94
TABLE 101: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF AVIATOR FACILITY ........................................................................... 94
TABLE 102: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF HOUSING FACILITY ........................................................................... 95
TABLE 103: MAINTAINING AND REPAIRING MACHINERIES AND VEHICLES ................................................ 95
TABLE 104: MAINTENANCE SUMMARY FOR ALL ASSET CATEGORIES .......................................................... 96
TABLE 105: REHABILITATION SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 99
TABLE 106: UNIT RATE FOR THE MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSETS ................................................................ 102
TABLE 107: UNIT RATE FOR WATER SUPPLY NETWORK ASSETS .................................................................. 102
TABLE 108: UNIT RATE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITY AREA .................................................................. 103
TABLE 109: SUMMARY OF CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST AND RESIDUAL VALUE OF THE CITY
ASSETS ................................................................................................................................................................ 103
TABLE 110: CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST OF THE MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSET-
ROAD.................................................................................................................................................................. 105
TABLE 111: RESIDUAL VALUE OF THE MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSET- ROAD ...................... 106
TABLE 112: CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST OF THE MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSET-
WALKWAY ...................................................................................................................................................... 106
TABLE 113: RESIDUAL VALUE OF THE MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSET- WALKWAY .......... 106
TABLE 114: CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST AND RESIDUAL VALUE OF THE MOVEMENT
NETWORK ASSET- ROAD STRUCTURE ............................................................................................ 107
TABLE 115: RESIDUAL VALUE OF THE MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSET- ROAD STRUCTURE
............................................................................................................................................................................... 107
TABLE 116: CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST OF THE MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSET-
STREET LIGHT, ............................................................................................................................................. 107
TABLE 117: RESIDUAL VALUE OF THE MOVEMENT NETWORK ASSET- STREET LIGHT ... 107
TABLE 118: CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST OF ABOVE GROUND WATER SUPPLY NETWORK ASSETS
............................................................................................................................................................................... 108
TABLE 119: CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST OF BELOW GROUND WATER SUPPLY NETWORK ASSETS
............................................................................................................................................................................... 108
TABLE 120: RESIDUAL VALUE COST OF ABOVE GROUND WATER SUPPLY NETWORK ASSETS............ 109
TABLE 121: RESIDUAL VALUE COST OF BELOW GROUND WATER SUPPLY NETWORK ASSETS ........... 110

IX
TABLE 122: CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITY AREA ....... 110
TABLE 123: REPLACEMENT COST OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC STRATEGIC AREA ASSETS
............................................................................................................................................................................... 111
TABLE 124: REPLACEMENT COST OF SUPPORTING SERVICES AREA ........................................................... 111
TABLE 125: ESTIMATED CURRENT VALUE OF SOCIAL, ECONOMIC & SUPPORTING SERVICES ............ 112
TABLE 126: REHABILITATION SUMMARY............................................................................................................ 115
TABLE 127: SUMMARY OF THREE-YEAR ROLLING CIP FOR EFY 2015 TO 2017 BY STRATEGIC AREA IN
BIRR ..................................................................................................................................................................... 116
TABLE 128: PROPOSED THREE YEARS NEW WORKS PROJECTS (THREE-YEAR ROLLING CIP 2015-2017)
............................................................................................................................................................................... 118
TABLE 129: FINANCIAL PLAN FOR PROPOSED NEW WORK PROJECTS (2015-2017) .................................... 124
TABLE 130: - PRIORITIZATION OF NEW PROJECTS WITHIN THE ACTIVITY AREA OR ANNUAL EFY 2015
EFY CIP PROJECT DETAIL BY SOURCE OF FUNDS .................................................................................... 125
TABLE 131: - PRIORITIZATION OF NEW PROJECTS WITHIN THE ACTIVITY AREA ..................................... 132
TABLE 132: - APPROVED BUDGET FOR NEW WORK PROJECTS ...................................................................... 132
TABLE 133: MAINTENANCE DEFICIT SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 134
TABLE 134: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS THE MAINTENANCE DEFICIT
MOMENT NETWORK ........................................................................................................................................ 136
TABLE 135: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS THE MAINTENANCE DEFICIT-WATER
SUPPLY ASSETS................................................................................................................................................. 138
TABLE 136: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS THE MAINTENANCE DEFICIT-
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITY AREA ............................................................................................................. 138
TABLE 137: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS THE MAINTENANCE DEFICIT-
BUILDINGS ......................................................................................................................................................... 138
TABLE 138: PRIORITIZATION OF MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS THE MAINTENANCE
DEFICIT-MOVEMENT NETWORK .................................................................................................................. 139
TABLE 139: PRIORITIZATION OF MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS THE MAINTENANCE
DEFICIT-ENVIRONMENTAL AREA ................................................................................................................ 139
TABLE 140: - MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY OF OPEN MASONRY DRAINAGE WITH ITS PRIORITY LEVEL 140
TABLE 141: - THREE YEARS MAINTENANCE BUDGET (2015 – 2017EFY) ....................................................... 141
TABLE 142: ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR MAINTENANCE BUDGET FOR EFY 2015 .................................... 143
TABLE 143: THREE YEAR ROLLING CIP FOR THE CITY OF WORETA. (EFY 2015 TO 2017) ........................ 145
TABLE 144: SUMMARY OF APPROVED 3-YEAR NEW WORKS ROLLING PROGRAM BY STRATEGIC
ACTIVITY AREAS .............................................................................................................................................. 150
TABLE 145: THREE YEARS ROLLING PROGRAM MAINTENANCE BUDGET FOR EFY 2015 TO 2017 ........ 151
TABLE 146: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF ALL NEW WORKS FOR 2015 EFY ....................................... 154
TABLE 147: MONTHLY SCHEDULE OF MAINTENANCE DEFICIT ACTIVITIES OF THE YEAR 2015 .......... 161
TABLE 148: IMPLEMENTED SCHEDULE OF ALL NEW WORKS FOR 2014 EFY .............................................. 162
TABLE 149: IMPLEMENTED MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE OF 2014 E.C ............................................................ 167
TABLE 150: NEW WORKS PROJECTS STARTED AGAINST PROJECTS APPROVED FOR AMP YEAR-2...... 168

X
 LIST OF TABLE

FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP OF WERETA CITY ......................................................................................................... 3

FIGURE 2: THE BACKDROP IMAGE (GOOGLE SATELLITE IMAGE) OF WERETA CITY ................................. 13
FIGURE 3: WERETA AMP GEODATABASE DESIGNED IN ARCGIS 10.4.1 SOFTWARE.................................... 14
FIGURE 4: EXAMPLE OF ATTRIBUTE DOMAIN AND SUBTYPE FOR WERETA AMP GEO-DATABASE ...... 16
FIGURE 5: DIAGRAM OF THE ATTRIBUTE DATABASES AND FILES USED FOR THE AMP .......................... 19
FIGURE 6: ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF HUMAN RESOURCE IN WERETA CITY UIID TEAM ......... 21
FIGURE 7: STORING MULTIPLE SETS OF ATTRIBUTES FOR A FEATURE PERFORMED USING LINEAR
REFERENCING ..................................................................................................................................................... 28
FIGURE 8: ROAD NETWORK MAP OF WERETA ...................................................................................................... 29
FIGURE 9: PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD BY SURFACE FINISH ............................................... 31
FIGURE 10: PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY MAP ............................................................................................................. 32
FIGURE 11. STREET LIGHTS BY ROAD HIERARCHY ............................................................................................ 34
FIGURE 12: WATER SUPPLY NETWORK MAP OF WERETA CITY ....................................................................... 36
FIGURE 13: DISTRIBUTION OF SANITATION FACILITIES IN WERETA CITY ................................................... 38
FIGURE 14: SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION OF ADMINISTRATION INSTITUTES IN ALL 4 KEBELES OF WERETA
................................................................................................................................................................................. 40
FIGURE 15: SAMPLE INVENTORS OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTES OF WERETA ........................................... 41
FIGURE 16: SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION MAP OF THE HEALTH CENTRE IN WERETA ........................................ 42
FIGURE 17: DISTRIBUTION OF YOUTH CENTRE‘S IN WERETA CITY ............................................................... 43
FIGURE 18: DISTRIBUTION OF MSE FACILITIES IN WERETA CITY ................................................................... 44
FIGURE 19: INVENTORIED ABATTOIR FACILITY (THE NEW ABATTOIR FACILITIES) ................................. 45
FIGURE 20: ROAD NETWORK EVENTS..................................................................................................................... 54
FIGURE 21: DISTRIBUTION OF SANITATION FACILITIES IN WERETA CITY ................................................... 57
FIGURE 22: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF SANITATION FACILITIES IN WERETA CITY ......... 58
FIGURE 23: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF URBAN GREENERY IN WORETA CITY................... 60
FIGURE 24: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES IN WORETA CITY
................................................................................................................................................................................. 62
FIGURE 25: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IN WORETA CITY .... 63
FIGURE 26: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF HEALTH FACILITIES IN WORETA CITY................. 64
FIGURE 27: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF YOUTH CENTER .......................................................... 65
FIGURE 28: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF MSE FACILITIES IN WORETA CITY ........................ 66
FIGURE 29: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF HOUSING FACILITIES IN WORETA CITY............... 67
FIGURE 30: CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF ABATTOIR FACILITIES IN WORETA CITY ............ 68
FIGURE 31 CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF ABATTOIR FACILITIES IN WORETA CITY ............. 69
FIGURE 32: ROUTINE AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE BUDGET FOR THE ROAD ......................................... 75
FIGURE 33: PROPORTION OF MAINTENANCE DEFICIT OF ROAD SURFACING .............................................. 80
FIGURE 34: BUDGETS FOR MAINTENANCE DEFICIT BY STRATEGIC AREA................................................... 98
FIGURE 35: REHABILITATION OR REPLACEMENT FORECAST .......................................................................... 99
FIGURE 36: CONTRIBUTION OF ASSET CLASSES BY STRATEGIC ACTIVITY AREA FOR THE TOTAL
REPLACEMENT VALUE OF THE CITY ASSETS ........................................................................................... 104
FIGURE 37: CONTRIBUTION OF ASSET CLASSES BY STRATEGIC ACTIVITY AREA FOR THE TOTAL
RESIDUAL VALUE OF THE CITY ASSETS. ................................................................................................... 105
FIGURE 38: THE SHARE OF WATER SYSTEM ASSETS FOR CRC OF WATER SUPPLY NETWORK............. 109
FIGURE 39: CURRENT REPLACEMENT COST OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AREA .............................. 112

XI
FIGURE 40: PROPORTION OF THE THREE YEARS CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN BY STRATEGIC
CATEGORY ......................................................................................................................................................... 117
FIGURE 41: SUMMARY OF APPROVED 3-YEAR NEW WORKS ROLLING PROGRAM BY STRATEGIC
ACTIVITY AREAS .............................................................................................................................................. 150

XII
Executive Summary
The Asset Management Plan (AMP) of Wereta City has been prepared following the ten steps of
Asset Management Plan operational manual prepared by the Ministry of Urban Development and
Housing published in June, 2016.

The Asset Management Plan of Wereta City is designed and managed using ArcGIS 10.4.1
software after building a comprehensive geodatabase. This comprehensive geodatabase is named
―Wereta AMP Geodatabase‖ which is organized in Feature Dataset, Feature Class and Geodatabase
table. Besides the geodatabase is also organized in attribute domain to share various feature classes
from it.

The Wereta AMP has been prepared after conducting detailed inventory of the City`s Assets using
high resolution Ortho photo as a base map. During the inventory period a total of 10 professionals
involved and more than half of the professionals are employed from the city.

The inventory result of the city`s AMP shows that; wereta has 91.73 kilometers of road that
included ERA Asphalt Road, 30.607 kilometers of urban drainage,1.717 kilometer of Pedestrian
walkways, 19.99 kilometers of distribution pipeline and 11.801 kilometers of transmission pipeline.
Moreover, the city has 176 Culverts, and 183 Street Lights. The city also has Administrative Office
Buildings, Educational Service Buildings, Health Service Buildings, Abattoir Service Buildings,
Youth Center Buildings, MSE Facility and Housing Buildings with a total count of 32, 66, 13, 4, 4,
17 and 125 respectively.
Condition Assessment for all the Asset categories had been done using the World Bank Asset
Management Condition Assessment guideline. The Condition Assessment done for all Assets will
lead to build a maintenance budget for each Asset. Accordingly, excluding the routine and periodic
maintenance the total maintenance need of Wereta City is birr 32,349,392.04 but the maintenance
deficit and routine maintenance by the city irrespective of the recommendation of maintenance
budget allocation by AMP manual is birr 37,573,240.78
Valuation of the City`s Assets with current market price also done and total current replacement
cost of the city assets is estimated to be about birr 919,779,672.30 and the residual value of the city
is birr 607,351,444.13 with birr 312,428,228.40 Asset Deficit.

The other important work that should be done in preparing the city`s AMP is to integrate with the
city`s Capital Investment Plan. Accordingly; the plan proposes birr 66,074,800.44 For new works
projects in the Ethiopian Budget Year of 2015. Birr 13,694,152.86 for rehabilitation works
identified from condition assessments of the city assets and birr 6,607,480.04 is estimated to
maintain the city`s assets.

1
1. Wereta City Profile

1.1 Background Information

1.1.1 Location of the Town

Wereta (also spelled as Woreta) is a town in northern Ethiopia. Located in the South Gondar
Zone of the Amhara Region, east of Lake Tana and 120 kilometre south of historic and UNSCO
registered Gondar town, Wiretap astronomically it is located at 10 045‘-12045‘North latitude and
36010‘ -38045‘East longitude at Lake Tana basin corridor. The town is found at average elevation of
1500-2500 above sea levels with average elevation of 1828 meters. It is located about 625kms
North-West of Addis Ababa-the national capital city of Ethiopia, and 55 Km from the Amhara
Regional capital city Bahir Dar.

According to the Structure Plan Report of Wereta Town which was prepared in 2003 EC by
Amhara National Planning Institute; the town‘s total area coverage is 89.46 km 2. The same
document described that, the town has somehow elongated shape (linear form), that may be
attributed to its establishment following the main asphalt highway Addis Ababa-Gondar (in which
the town stretched from Northeast towards Southwest). Besides, it comprises four urban and three
rural Kebeles. According to the report (Amhara National Planning Institute, 2011), there were
about 5,863 housing units in the town, out of which 7.33% is owned by the government and 72.67%
is privately owned. Wereta town is the administrative centre of Fogera woreda. According to the
projection made by Central Statistics Authority 2013, the town has a total population of 27,159
consisting 17,061 male and 10096 female and as per the population projection for the year 2017
(EFY 2009) the town has a total population of 43,917 consisting 22,218 male and 21,699 female
populations, whereas as the town`s Finance and Economic Development Office claimed the town
total population is 47,315 for the year 2011 E.C.As per the figure from the Federal CSA for the year
2011 EFY the Census result depicted that, Wereta city has a total population of 47,315 of which
23,658 are male and 23,657 are females.

2
 Figure 1: Location Map of Wereta City

1.1.2 Establishment History of the Town

Historically, it is believed that Wereta town was found during the establishment of St. Georges
church at the realm of Emperor Sarayaku (around the 15 th century). Mythological, the name of
Wereta town believed to be designated by Atse Zerayakobe. In another historical account, Wereta
appears in the Royal chronicles during the first reign of Emperor Tekle-Giyorgis (1779-1784), as
the place whence Ras Hailu Eshete fled after escaping imprisonment in Gondar.

Wereta was included as one of the stages of the Gondar-Boso trade route of the 1840s, located
immediately south of the Reb River, according to some scholars compiled historical accounts.

Even though, the aforementioned historical accounts have different views about the establishment
period of the town; Amhara national Regional state (ANRS) Planning Institute discloses in the

3
planning document of the town that, Wereta town was established for the first time in 1942 E.C
by Captain Abraham Meshesha around Tachi-Ketema currently Kebele 03 and again 1949 E.C by
Dejazimach Asfaw Tesema around Kidamie-Gebeya ( Lay-Ketema).In 1959 E.C the first primary
school was opened in Wereta town. In 1972 E.C Wereta town covers the water consumption from
bore hole. After 5 years in 1977 E.C and a year later Wereta has 24 hour electricity light utility and
it has served the capital city of Fogera woreda until June 1999 E.C, But in July 01/1999 E.C Wereta
town recognized as a city administration according to the proclamation law of 91/1996.

As of Hamle 1, 1999 E.C a new administrative arrangement was made and since then the town has
got a status of city administration. Currently, the town is divided into four administrative Kebeles.
According to the ANRS Urban Development, Housing and Construction Bureau urban grade
system; Wereta town ranked as small-town category. The Town is accountable to South Gondar
Zone Administration. The main economic activity prevail in the town is commerce.

1.1.3 Municipal Physical Infrastructures and Other Services

Wereta town has been beneficiary of telecommunication services since 1967 EC. Currently,
Ethiopian Telecom Wereta branch is providing services to 600 land line greater than 46,577
mobile phone, 87 internets, and 65 fax using customers. Whilst the branch‘s networking coverage
capacity is estimated around 52,765 lines. And since 1978 EC the town has 24 ho10.644036 urs
electricity supply from the national grid. However, the city electricity service coverage is yet
limited to 53%. The current city problems related with electricity are limited street lighting
infrastructure and shortage of electricity materials to connect new settlements. In the 1990s, a new
campus for the Wereta College of Agriculture was designed by National Consultants (chief
architect Assefa Bekele), with a proposed budget of 60 million Birr. Located on top of a hill next to
the road to Bhir Dar, the college has a capacity of 2000 students and graduated 269 students in
2004.Wereta has two government owned full cycle primary schools called Wereta primary school
and Dudmegn primary school as well as one high school & vocational schools. Currently, Wereta
city has 6 kindergartens (5 private and 1 governmental), Grade 1 - 4, 2primaryschool (0 private and
2 governmental) grade 1-8, 2 governmental high schools, 1 preparatory, 1 TVT collage, 2 collages
(1 private and 1 governmental) and 1 agricultural college. The number of students involved in
2017/18 from kindergarten to preparatory 16,802 (male 8275 and female 8527). The health
facilities in Wereta include 1 ongoing government hospital, 1 government health centre, 7 private

4
clinics, 13 private pharmacies and 1 governmental pharmacy are giving service to the residents.
Wereta has one bus terminal station services that connects to woreda‘s, zones and other regions and
to Addis Ababa. Waste management and disposal in Wereta town is poor. The absence of dump
truck to transport solid waste from the inner city to the temporary disposal sites is critical. The
liquid waste management condition of the town is the worst. Wereta has no well-structured sanitary
land fill for solid and liquid waste treatment plant. The existing 1 temporary solid waste disposal
sites are environmentally unfriendly and have no capacity to serve the growing population of the
town. The poor handling and transportation of solid waste aggravated the poor health and sanitation
condition of the residents. Urban greenery is very vital for recreational value. In Wereta city most
greenery places are found on the periphery areas of the town. The urban property of Wereta town
has organized green framework facility within its boundary. The single greenery that the city owns
is the 2000 hectares‘ forest land situated in the Eastern out skirt of the city. However, because of the
pressure from the public, the city administration is trying hard to invite and encourage private
business entrepreneurs to invest on park and recreational centre developments. Regarding road
network of the town, based on the data from urban development housing and construction office of
the town, Wereta has 12.0689 km asphalt road for ERA and 0.6033 Km asphalt road For Woreta
Town Administration 42.222 km gravel road, 16.908 km cobble stone road 13.682 km earth Pressed
Road, 1.717 km side walk way, 6.17 Km Earthen Road, 176 culvert. 27.128 km open masonry
drainage 3.389 km closed masonry ditch.
The water supply source of the town is ground water, from 3old and 1 new bore holes, in which
these boreholes, 11.801 km transmission lines, 13.79 km distributions and 9 public taps are
expected to serve for the coming 15 years. Currently, the water supply coverage of the town not
exceed more than 76.3%. In a nutshell, water demand estimation of the town depicted that to fulfil
the prevailing water demand of the town at least two additional boreholes are mandatorily required.

1.1.4 Topography and Climatic Condition

The town has around 67 percentage of flat terrain and the rest area categorized as undulating terrain
with significant altitudinal variation. The Easter part of the town has steeped sloped area. The
central part is more or less of plain area while the northern and North - Eastern part of the city are
low laying areas with rolling terrain features that are drained by surrounding streams of perennial
and intermittent or seasonal nature. Altitude ranges from 1774 to 2410 MSL and is predominantly

5
classified as Woina-dega ecology. Geological features of the town and its vicinity categorized in
quaternary undifferentiated, which is characterized by alluvial and lacustrine deposits such as sand,
silt, clay, diatomite, limestone and beach sand. According to Fogera woreda Office of Agriculture,
the dominant major soil types of Fogera plains in general and Wereta town in particular are
commonly known black cotton or black clay soils (such as Chromic Vertisols and PellicVertisols),
while at the medium and high-altitude areas the major soils are orthicLuvisols and Chromic
Luvisols.
The climatic condition of Wereta is the reflection of its altitude. It experiences high rainfall and
moderate temperature; the mean annual rainfall is 1128. 42mm.The town is found in Woina -dega
agro-climatic zone. The mean annual temperature is 18.75 0c. The mean average maximum and
minimum temperature of the town is 27.2 0c and 10.30c respectively.

1.1.5 Economic Bases of the Town

The economy of Wereta is dominated by trade, small business, urban agriculture, investment.
Retailers and hotel related activities dominant on trade sector. Like other urban areas of Ethiopia
Poverty is the major challenge of the city administration. Unemployment is a serious problem to the
town. According to Wereta town micro and small-scale enterprise, there are 1,409 unemployed
people within the city. The main source of budget for the city administration of Wereta is direct and
indirect tax (excise & turnover tax and service income taxes.

1.1.6 Land Use/Land Cover

According to ANRS urban panning institute, from the total area coverage of the town the following
land use/ land cover types identified as major and their percentages account described as follows;
administration 1%, commerce or business establishment 7%, production storage 7%, mixed use 9%,
residential 25%, municipality and social service 16%, transport and road facilities 23% and others
15.16% (Source; ANRS Urban Planning Institute, 2003 EC).
Wereta town is found in Fogera worked, in which the Fogera worked is endowed with beautiful
diverse natural resources, with capacity to grow diverse annual and perennial crops. The Fogera
woreda is one of the eight Fogera Woreda‘s bordering Lake Tana and has an estimated water body
of 23,354 ha. The Fogera Woreda is classified as one of the surplus productive Fogera Woreda‘s in
the Region, particularly with rice cultivation.

6
1.2 Objective of the Asset Management Plan Report

1.2.1 General objective

The overall objective of the asset management is to provide a tool to Wereta municipality in order
to manage the infrastructure in an integrated and comprehensive approach. The asset management
gives guidance for further investment planning on fixed assets, maintenance requirement and major
repair and rehabilitation of the city assets.

1.2.2 Specific objective for asset management plan

 To provide an over view the major assets of Wereta city administration

 To improve infrastructure development planning and management practices.
 To address the resident‘s basic infrastructure needs with efficient and effective
management.
 To effectively plan the capital investment plans.
 Asses the quality and maintenance of assets within the town city.
 Fulfilling the requirement of UIIDP funding.

1.3 Scope of the Plan

This asset management plan is prepared in accordance with a 10-step described in the operational
manual of urban infrastructure asset management plan .To provide a first estimate of the asset base
with only limited data, a technique known as a strategic approach to asset management was
adopted. This takes what is known as a value approximation approach. This operational manual will
seek to demonstrate that asset management can appear to be an overwhelming concept which is
simply too big and complex to introduce. Asset management may not be simple, at least in the
beginning, but equally it is not that complex. And it has the major advantage that it can be
introduced in a phased manner. This makes an Asset Management Plan a management tool that is
well suited to incremental development over time. This concept of phasing relates to the degree of
accuracy of information required. The great benefit of asset management is that the process of
constructing an asset base can begin with simplified asset inventories and move to more detailed
inventories over a period of time. This means that the construction of an AMP can be an
incremental process within an asset category as well as across asset categories.

7
1.4 The Expected Out Comes

The major outcomes of the asset management plan include the following: -

Asset conditions will be assessed and budget requirement for backlog maintenance will be
calculated. New and rehabilitating infrastructure projects will be identified and 3 year
rolling infrastructure asset development and maintenance will be organized. Infrastructure
Asset Development plan implementation strategies will be articulate.

8
2. Step-1: BUILD THE GIS PROJECT AND THE DATA MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURE
As stipulated in Urban Infrastructure Asset Management Plan manual, asset management is
expensive to construct and maintain the strategic solutions of a city at one time. The merit of
GIS based database is the provision of ample, seamless integration, dynamically updateable
tabular and spatial data, easy query/analysis facilities and versatile for generating report for
project planning, budgeting and maintenance schedule. Besides, based on the information
generated, one can produce effective capital investment planning and strategies for long term
operation and maintenance of infrastructure asset. The Infrastructure Asset inventory asset
management plan of Wereta City has been prepared following the basic steps that is:

 Acquisition of Orth photo or Satellite Image for the AMP;

 Defining and Creating a Coordinate System of the Project;
 Geo-referencing the Orth photo/Satellite Image;
 Creation of a GIS Project which includes Geo-database (Feature Dataset, Feature Class and
Geodatabase Table.

2.1 The Geospatial Data of Wereta City

Astronomically, Wereta is located with geographic coordinates of 10 o 45` to 12o45` North Latitude
and 36o10` to 38o45` East Longitude. The average Temperature of the city is 18.75 oC which is the
most favorable weather condition throughout the Year. According to the Shuttle Radar Topographic
Mission Ninety Meter Elevation data; the city has a minimum and a maximum elevation of 1500 of
2500 meter above sea level respectively.

This updated manual uses a Geographical Information System as the platform for managing
spatial data. There is a very good reason for making this choice, which is summed up by the
following explanation, namely that: ―The use of spatial relational terms requires the selection of a
reference frame and the construction of a spatial template‖; What this statement means is that, to
build relationships between spatial data, two shared components are required. The first component
(the reference frame) is a common (shared) spatial referencing system, so that when a junction in a
road (for example) is given a coordinate, that coordinate is common to, and understood by all users
of the system. In Geographic Information System, there are two major coordinate systems: that is;

9
Geographic Coordinate System and Projected Coordinate System. To describe it briefly the former
(Geographic Coordinate System) is based on three-dimension coordinate system (x, y and z) or
Latitude, Longitude and Elevation that is modelled in mathematical geometry which define the
shape of the Earth in a circle and more specifically modelling the Earth is a sphere. However, the
limitation with the Geographic Coordinate System is not suitable for area and distance calculation
since it is based in degree, minute and second or degree, grad and radian.

Therefore, Geodesist`s have defined a datum based on a perfect ellipsoid for countries to have
different spatial reference system by projecting the three-dimensional coordinate in to two
dimensions as done by Transverse Mercator who is an American Mathematician and Geographer
who developed the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection by putting the Earth in a
cylinder. Accordingly, Ethiopia uses Adindan datum for a spatial reference for horizontal
measurement which fall in three Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projections consists of (36,
37 and 38 UTM zones) with Clarke 1880 modified spheroid. Then woreta town uses 37 UTM zones
Clarke 1880modified spheroid and the AMP of woreta are prepared by this coordinate system.

2.2 Establishing of a GIS project

Establishing a GIS operating environment is an important step that should be carried out for a city
for the first time or an existing once to implement Asset Management Plan successfully. Wereta
city service office and minster of urban development employed consultancy service of GIS based
Infrastructure Asset Inventory firm Compass AEPED Consultancy Plc. And Abugida the consulting
service in the Ethiopian Budget Year of 2011to work asset of wereta city administration. The
consultancy firm (Compass AEPED and compass consulting firm) and wereta city service AMP
team have conducted detailed inventory of its assets using Geographic Information System (GIS) as
platform. Consequently, the consulting firm and the city service AMP team created the GIS project
in ArcGIS 10.4.1 software by establishing full geo-database of its assets.

2.3 The difference between Data and Information

The two terms - data and information - are often used interchangeably. However, they are quite
distinct, and, since both are critical components of GIS, it is important to be clear about the
difference between them.

10
 1) The term ‗data‘ refers to raw facts. So, collecting facts about the road network, such as the
start and end points, length, width, material of surface finish and so on, is described as data
collection. In Asset Management, data is generally synonymous with numbers or values that
describe characteristics of the different elements that make up the various asset categories.
2) Information: on the other hand, is generally used to describe processed facts, i.e.; the
answer that comes out of queries made about the data, and which results in a useful or
meaningful output. Thus, a table that sums up how many kilometres of road the city has for
each surface finish is information. This example provides another way of looking at the
difference between the two terms, where it can be seen that the data provides simple facts,
while the information is actually transmitting a message about those facts.

2.4 Defining the relationship between Spatial and Attribute Data

Data is stored in tables known as databases, and a blank table that provides a pre-defined list of
columns that define the data to be collected is known as a template. The relationship for defining
spatial data versus attribute data depends up on the technology that we apply for preparing Asset
Management Plan. Geographic Information System (GIS) provides better platform for storing
attribute data while the spatial data displayed as graphics in the display in the drawing window of
specific GIS software. Geographic Information System is working in Relational Database
Management System with various sequential query languages.

In short spatial data in Infrastructure Asset Inventory and Management Plan is the road centre line,
drainage line, pedestrian walkway and road median which are represented in polyline in feature
geometry in GIS while the attribute data is the route id, node id, width of the road, surface material,
deterioration type, condition assessment and year of construction that will be collected from the
field survey in a city.

2.5 The Backdrop Image of the AMP

The back drop image is an important component of the Infrastructure Asset Inventory and
Management Plan in which the vector layers or spatial templates or feature classes are digitized
from this georeferenced Orth photo or Satellite Imagery. Contemporarily high-resolution Satellite
Imagery Acquisition companies in the World Are Geo-EYE, Digital Globe, SKYSAT and SPOT

11
PLEIADES. The first three belong to the United States of America while the last one belongs to
France.

The other important option for a backdrop image for the AMP is high resolution Ortho Photo in
which high resolution Photo Camera will be mounted on an Air Plane and takes Aerial View Shots
of a place. These Snap shots of aerial picture of a place will be processed in photogrammetric soft
wares with a super computer or work station. Currently, the Information Network Security Agency
(INSA) is mandated to perform this task in Ethiopia. Accordingly, the Ministry of Urban
Development and Housing (MUDH) in collaboration with INSA and the Ethiopian Mapping
Agency have captured Ortho Photo of 23 major cities in Ethiopia which was flown in June, 2012
G.C. by INSA.

But here, Google Satellite images are used as a back drop image for the inventory of Woreta‘surban
infrastructure assets.

12
Figure 2: The Backdrop Image (Google Satellite Image) of Wereta City

2.6 The Geo-Database Structure

ArcGIS geodatabase is a collection of geographic datasets of various types held in a common file
system folder, or a multiuser relational DBMS (such as Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL,
Informix, or IBM DB2). Geodatabases come in many sizes, have varying numbers of users and can
scale from small, single-user databases built on files up to larger workgroup, department, and
enterprise geodatabases accessed by many users (ESRI, 2015).

There are three types of geodatabases in ArcGIS. Namely

13
 i. Personal Geo-database
ii. File Geo-database
iii. ArcSDE Geo-database
The Wereta AMP geodatabase is designed in File Geo-database which has a Megabyte memory
which allows various Raster and Vector data to be stored within it.

Figure 3: Wereta AMP geodatabase designed in ArcGIS 10.4.1 Software

The Wereta AMP File Geo-database is structured in feature dataset, Raster Dataset, feature class
and geodatabase table. This helps the user to have a quick view of the data in Arc Catalog of
ArcGIS and allow automatic calculation of length and area while you work in ArcGIS Geo-
database. Moreover, the geodatabase is structured using attribute domain and subtype. The logic
behind organizing data in attribute domain is to set the permissible value of a field type or to
constrain the value allowed for any particular attribute for a table, feature class or sub-type. This is
quite useful to constrain the allowable value of a field type in a situation where the same feature
class data entry is handled by different person. For instance, road material attribute is constrained to
the following values:

14
Surface Material Code
 Asphalt Road (1),
 Cobble Road (2),
 Gravel Road (3),
 Red Ash Road (4),
 Earth pressed Road (12),
 Earthen Natural (6)
 Culvert (9)
 Tile bazzola Walk way (8)

Besides, a person can easily manage data entry by choosing from the look up table instead of
consuming time for entering value just by writing; which obviously is different from one person to
another. For instance, if the data is not organized according to the aforementioned approach of geo-
database in uncontrolled manner, one person may write mistakenly ―concrete road‖ as ‗concrete
road’, the others ‘concrete’ and so on, which makes difficult the integrity of data for generating
refined report on asset management plan. In conclusion, the organization of data as mentioned
above makes data entry to be simple as one can easily choose the values from the already set look
up table; even without having user interface system.

The other advantage of attribute domain is sharing of the same attribute by different feature class.
For instance, the general condition assessment of all asset categories is modeled (coded) as:1(Very
Good), 2(Good), 3(Moderate),4(Poor) and 5(Severe) that is shared from the geo-database by all
feature class of Road, Walkways, Drainage, culvert and Strait light to describe the condition of the
given infrastructure asset. So, the attribute domain enforces data integrity by maintaining common
values to share same information that can be performed by different persons and different attributes
of different feature class to share the same attribute so as to realize consistency, validity and
integrity of data.

15
Figure 4: Example of Attribute Domain and Subtype for Wereta AMP geo-database

Subtypes are also implemented for categorizing data by creating subsets of features in a feature
class instead of creating separate features. Subtypes are implemented by creating coded value and
by associating the field of data type short or long integer. This integer value each represents a
feature in the subtype. For instance, water distribution line feature class is disaggregated into
subset of features, based on material type, identified by unique coded value of: PVC (1), GS (2),
and HDPE (3)

This makes easier the editing process because when one edits a field with coded value domain, a
drop-down list of all the domain values appears. The template allows choosing from the look up

16
table of each feature class, which makes updating, editing and locating complex asset data more
easily; and more versatile system is implemented to maintain data integrity.

2.7 Creating Tabular Database Structure.

A tabular database has been compiled for an infrastructure asset categories and sub-categories. The
road is classified in to Asphalt Road, Cobble Road, Gravel Road, Red Ash Road, Earthen
Pressedroad, and Culvert were classified by road surface material. A specific sub-category of the
asset, say asphalt road, consists of many fields or attributes such as carriage width in meter, left and
right carriage way Herbing material and width, date of construction, road condition and so on. The
route is also divided along section of road in to a number of discrete sections for ease of
maintenance and quality definition for road, walkways, drainage and street Light.

Similarly, for water distribution line, the main subset of the distribution line is categorized in to
DCI, GS, HDPE and PVC by material type. The same is true for point data like Street light where
the left and right-side point data is captured including attributes of street light type (Incandescent,
Florescent, High Pressure Magnesium Light, High Pressure Sodium Light and Light Emitting
Diode) using hand held GPS.

A similar situation would apply to the linear elements of the water supply category. So, for
example, using the sub-category of water, steel distribution mains, and a similar set of variations
would apply, defining different elements (segments) of the sub-category by length, class and
diameter.

For further elaboration of the approach for tabular database template pursuant to operational
manual, two examples are provided. The first one let us take a linear element of Road, its category
is Road and Movement Network, its sub-category is Cobble or Gravel Road, element is described
by defining two node points (Node from, Node to), one defining the start while the other defining
the end respectively. The route is uniquely identified by Route id. In the same manner, let us take
a point element of pump, its category is Water Supply Network, its sub-category is pump, its
specific geographic location is identified by x, y coordinates and described according to pipe
material, dimension, discharge amount, year installed and so on. The element is identified by
unique number.

17
The spatial and non-spatial databases are linked with unique id, which makes the integration
versatile to accommodate data within the same geo-database system. More indicators are developed
for infrastructure asset management plan based on the operational manual and tailoring variables to
the context of Wereta city. The following table depicted below shows sample road network and
drainage tabular database templates used for Wereta City Asset Inventory and management plan.

Table 1: Example of Tabular Database for Road Network Category and Sub-Category

Field Name Data Type Description of the Field Name

Route ID Text Route Identification Number
Node From Text Node From
Node To Text Node To
Length From Double Length From
Length To Double Length To
RoadMat Text Road Material
Length Double Actual Length in Metre
Deterioration Type Text Type of Deterioration
Deterioration Area Double Deterioration Area in m2
Condition Text Condition Assessment
Carriageway Width Double Carriage Width
CarraiageWayType Text Carriage Way Type
Kerbing Material Left Text Kerbing Material Left
Kerbing Left Width Double Kerbing Left Width in Centimetre
Kerbing Material Right Text Kerbing Material Right
Kerbing Right Width Double Kerbing Left Right in Centimetre
Construction Year Long Integer Date/Year Construction
Maintenance Year Long Integer Maintenance Year
Ownership Text Ownership of Road

The overall database structure of this AMP is established in the following form (adopted from the
manual). Thus, the AMP data holds all the required Tabular Data Sets (TDS) of assets.

 TDS1: is dataset that provides data on the physical condition of all assets;
 TDS 2: is data set that provides data on the assets cost and value;
 TDS 3: is data set that provides data on all new works;
 TDS 4: is data set that provides data on the condition and maintenance requirements;
 TDS 5: is data set that provides data on the maintenance planning;

18
Figure 5: Diagram of the attribute databases and files used for the AMP

2.8 The Computer Directory Management Structure.

The AMP computer directory management system of Wereta City has been prepared maintenance
requirements and maintenance planning). These have been arranged in an integrated form (Geo-
database, Feature Dataset, Feature Classes, and tables for viewing, manipulating, updating and
analyzing spatial data. Besides, the directory also contains Microsoft Word format report, and Orth
photo of the City.

The other important technology selection for this project is choice of the appropriate software. Arc
Info ArcGIS 10.4.1 has been selected by the World Bank for Infrastructure Asset Inventory and
Management Plan as ideal software for the preparation of Wereta AMP. This software is the
product of Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI, 2015 Redlands California USA)
which is the most powerful GIS software for entertaining large database which are compatible in
any database soft wares like SQL Server or Oracle and programming languages like C#, VB.Net,
Python, and Java.

Desktop ArcGIS 10.4.1 has a number of extensions for instance Linear Referencing, Spatial
Analyst, Network Analyst, 3D Analyst, etc.…from the available extensions, Linear Referencing,
Network Analyst and Spatial Analysis will be chosen to perform the Asset Management Plan study
of the city. The details of these extensions are discussed in the following sections.

19
 Table 2: the directory, folders, files and their purposes is shown below on the table.

Directory Folders File Name Content

D Wereta Asset
Management
Wereta AMP geodatbase.gdb Spatial Asset data, conditions
Total length condition and Valuation, Maintenance Deficit Calculation
Maitenance2
Wereta 2011 to 2013 CIP New Projects, Valuation, Maintenance Budget
Calculation, source of budget, population growth

20
3. Step-2: BUILDING THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND THE
ASSET MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
3.1 The City's Institutional Framework

WeretaCity has a council elected by its residents that assumes the Legislative power and the city
Mayor in whom executive leadership is vested to exercise executive authority. The city manager is
in charge of municipal services and is appointed by the mayor. The city administration of wereta
has a ULGDP Coordinator which is under the city`s Manager Office and has five major offices
namely: Monitoring and Evaluation Expert, Procurement Expert, Public Finance Expert,
Infrastructure Development Main Business Process and Environmental and Social Safeguard
Expert.

Figure 6: Organizational Structure of Human Resource in Wereta City UIID team

3.2 Organization of the team

For the preparation of this Asset Inventory, the City Service of wereta has been established under
the CIP team. In connection with the relevant offices like Water Supply Service Office, Ethiopian
Electric light Power Authority has been giving input to the team. Hence the following team

21
 members are highly engaged and took the responsibility of asset inventory, maintenance and
planning.

Table 3: Members of the AMP Task Team

S/N Position Name (s) Qualifications Contact Details

Wereta City Administration
P.O.BOX 49 serves for all
1 Coordinator Zemene Gedamu B.sc in Construction Cell phone: 0922776762
technology and
Email:
management zemenegedamu21@gmail.com
2 Asset Management Adamtew Desalegn B.sc in Civil Cell phone:0918648318
Plan Focal Person engineering
3 Land use Alebachew Tesfa B.AinUrban planning Cell phone:0918536512
and Design
4 CIP, Planning & Muluneh B.A. in Geography Cell phone:0918082568
Alebachew Email:
Participation
5 Revenue Destaw Nigusie B.A. in Accounting Cell phone:0918248707
Enhancement Plan Email:
6 Procurement AlemayehuBitew B.A. in Management Cell phone:0918783005
Management Email:
7 Financial Yalemwork B.AinAccounting Cellphone:0984268319
Management and Finance
8 Environmental Mekuannt B.AinGeography Cell phone: 0923160359
social safeguard Email:
9 Internal Audit Endalkachewworku B.AinSupply Cell phone: 0918402502
management Email;
andprocurement
Project Engineer Fentahun Genetu B.sc in Civil Cell phone:0918409840
engineering
10 Email:funny1621g@gmail.com

3.3 Responsibilities of the AMP Unit

The responsible body for asset management and planning is that of the Housing and Infrastructure
process. It is situated as a line process office under Urban Development, Housing and Construction
Service Office. Thus, it is with this process that the AMP staffs are positioned.

22
 While the responsibility of Urban Development, Housing and Construction Service Office rely on
coordinating the planning, management and development of the asset infrastructure. The Housing
and Infrastructure Process is responsible for the asset management plan as well as an infrastructure
management system in the city administration.

3.4 Departmental Responsibility for the AMP in each asset category

There are various departments in the Municipality that is responsible for each infrastructure Asset
Category which is responsible for the routine maintenance and other activities which is clearly
stated in the table below.

Table 4: Category of Infrastructure Asset and Responsible Body in the City`s Organogram.

Categories of Responsible
No Responsible Body Remarks
Assets Person/Group
1 Roads Infrastructure Team Members Infrastructure team s is responsible to open
Development Main Of the process new roads based on the City‘s Structure Plan;
Business Process While Design, Construction, & Contract
Administration &Infrastructure Process is
responsible for construction, Maintenance and
Management of the Road

2 Urban Infrastructure Team Members of Responsible for construction, maintenance and

Drainage Systems. Development Main the process management
Business Process of
the City`s
3 Street Light Administration
Infrastructure Team Members Responsible for the Installation of Streel
Development Main of the process Light
Business Process of
the City`s
4 Water Supply Administration
WERETA CITY Team Members Wereta Water Supply Service Office are
Systems Water Supply Of the Enterprise responsible for provision /supply of water for
Service Office the people of Wereta City Administration

5 Solid and Liquid Beautification and Team Members Beautification and Green Development Office
Waste Green Development of the process
Management Office
System, Urban
6 Greenery and
Abattoir and Park City Service and Team Members City Service and Supply Office
Municipal Supply Office of the process
Buildings

23
 Categories of Responsible
No Responsible Body Remarks
Assets Person/Group
7 Education, Health, Each Sectorial Each Sectorial Responsible for maintenance & Supervision of
MSEs and Market Department of the Department of the each facility and buildings in their respective
Facilities City`s City`s sectors
Administration Administration

3.5 Definition of Infrastructure Categories and Sub-categories

The term ‗category‘, as it applies to asset management that can be defined as a specific group of
assets that share a common purpose, and as such are managed together as a group. A water supply
network is more than just the water pipes in the ground. There are valves, reservoirs, pumps,
standpipes and many other components. It is all of those components together that make up the
category of assets termed ‗The Water Supply Network‘. Similarly, a school can be more than just
a building; it can include a boundary wall or fence; a paved area; a toilet block; a playing field, etc.
So, the category ‗school‘ has to include all of these components.

In the new version of the AMP manual; it is clearly stated that the AMP that will be prepared in any
urban centre should incorporate all of the city‘s physical assets. The list of Categories and Sub
Categories that belongs to the city Asset should been defined first before full deployment of field
survey launched. Accordingly, the list of infrastructure asset Categories has been defined in to four
strategic activity areas except municipal administration buildings. The allocation of asset categories
to the four strategic activity areas is shown in table 4 below.

The other important step that should be done after categorizing the infrastructure asset into four
strategic areas is defining the responsible organ (body) who manages the asset categories in the city
administration. Accordingly, the infrastructure asset categories have been categorized in to four
strategic activity areas as depicted in the table below.

Table 5: Allocation of Categories of Physical Assets to the Four Strategic Activity Areas

The Movement The Water Supply Environmental Services Social and Economic Services
Network Network

Road Network Water Supply Urban drainage Abattoirs

24
Walkways Water resources Sanitation Administration

Street Lighting Reservoir Solid waste Municipal markets

Pedestrian Walkways Valves Urban Greenery MSE facilities

Road structure Culvert Borehole play areas Schools

Road structure Bridge Pump Health clinics

Machinery Youth centres

Other

3.6 The Structure of the Identifier System

There is currently no single system of identifiers used for assets in Ethiopia. As a result, different
groups may already be generating identifier systems for the same assets. For example, the Bureaus
of Finance and Economic Development Use Pin Codes for asset identification. While it would be
ideal to have only one identifier system for all uses, it is also important to recognize that an
identifier system that has been created for a specific use may not be suited to another purpose.

As a result, the manual has produced a different identifier system, designed specifically for the
Asset Management Plan. This unique identifier, which is described below, has been tested in a
number of cities and has shown itself to be robust and versatile. At the same time some minor
changes have been made to the individual components of the identifier in response to user feedback.
The unique identifier is made up of four parts and, while it has been created specifically for asset
management, it has also been designed to provide an interface with other users of the asset
infrastructure and services that are likely to use the information generated by the asset database
system. The unique identifier is made up of four parts.

Identifier Component 1: This is a 4 character, alphabetic, code that is linked to the asset category
(with the first two letters) and the feature class (with the second two letters). This provides a quick
internal referencing system for the AMP itself. A list of codes for all categories and feature classes
included in the manual is listed in table 8 below.

25
Identifier Component 2: This is a 3-4 character, alpha-numeric, code indicating the major
characteristic of the asset. This links the asset to its primary user, and it is for the primary user to
define this specific component of the identifier. This is something that can be done at any time. In
the interim period this component has been given the code ―xxxx‖.

Identifier Component 3: This is a 2 character, alphabetic code providing a local administrative

reference. It is recommended that this code be used as a unique identifier for a city, which would
have the advantage of creating unique asset identifiers across all cities producing asset management
plans. In the interim this component has been given the code CC, standing for City Code.

Identifier Component 4: This is a numeric code with 5 digits, followed by an underscore separator
and a further 2 digits. The 5-digit code is used to provide each element with a specific identifier,
while the two-digit code allows the element to be sub-divided to provide a higher level of detail for
the condition indicator. The four parts of the identifier are each separated by hyphens. Note that full
stops and backslashes should be avoided as these are computer reserved symbols. For instance, a
route segment of road located in wereta with route Id ―0001‖ will have a unique identifier of
RN_AS_WO_0001_00

Where:

 ―RN‖; represents Road Network

 ―AS‖; represents its surface material which is Asphalt
 ―WO‖; represents code for Wereta city
 ―0001‖; for the route id given for that segment
 ―00‖; the code reserved for the route if the road element was broken down further.

3.7 The List of Codes Used for the First Block of the Identifiers

The list of codes is shown in the table below which represents the details of feature classes with
their associated codes. For instance, ―RN‖ represents Road Network while ―AS‖ represent Asphalt
Road. Likewise, the rest of the Asset Categories gave their own specific codes.

Table 6: List of Category and Feature Class Codes

Category Code Feature Class Code Feature Class Code

26
The Road Network RN Asphalt road AS Water meter WM
The Urban Drainage Network UD Cobblestone road CB Hydrant HY
The Street Lighting Network SL Gravel road GR Customer connection CC
The Water Supply Network WS Earth road CE Communal standpipe CS
Water Resources WR Walkway FP Public and communal PT
toilet
Solid Waste Management SW red ash road RO Landfill site LS
Sanitation SA Bridge BR WB
Urban Greenery UG Culvert CU SC
Abattoirs AR Reservoir RE Machinery MA
Municipal Markets MM Water pipeline WN Building and facility BU
network
MSE Facilities MS Pump PU Fence and boundary FE
wall
Schools SC Valve VA Administrative AB
boundary
Health Centers HC External site boundary EB
Youth Centers YC Internal boundary IB
Municipal Buildings MB

3.8 Establishing the GIS Operating Environment for the AMP

The spatial operating environment, which the consulting firm used for this assignment, is GIS and
Specifically Dynamic Segmentation tool from Linear Referencing extension of ArcGIS 10.4.1
software. This tool has so many advantages which are due to its versatility for data entry,
management, updating, and analysis; and besides for water assets; the company used Network
Analyst extension of ArcGIS 10.4.1.

Linear Referencing: is the method of storing geographic locations by using relative positions along
a measured linear feature. Distance measures are used to locate events along the line. In most data
models, linear features split at intersections where they connect with two or more line features and
frequently also split where key attribute values change, such as a change in the road name.
However, users often want to record many additional attributes about the roads. This could require
that roads may split into many tiny segments at each location where attribute values change. As an
alternative, these situations can be handled as linear referencing events along the roads as illustrated
in the concept figure below.

27
Figure 7: Storing Multiple Sets of Attributes for a Feature performed using Linear Referencing

Why We Use Linear Referencing?

Linear referencing is used for many reasons. The following are the two primary reasons:
 Many locations are recorded as events along linear features—for example, locations of
traffic accidents are recorded using a convention such as "27 meters east of reference mile
marker 35 along State Highway 287." Many sensors record conditions along linear features
using measures of distance or time along the lines—along pipelines, along roads, along
streams, and so forth.
 Linear referencing is also used to associate multiple sets of attributes to portions of linear
features without requiring that underlying lines be segmented (split) each time that attribute
values change. For example, most road centerline feature classes are segmented where three
or more road segments intersect and where the road names change.

What is Dynamic Segmentation?

Dynamic segmentation is the process of computing the map locations of events stored and managed
in an event table using a linear referencing measurement system and displaying them on a map. The
term dynamic segmentation is derived from the concept that line features need not be split (in other

28
words, "segmented") each time an attribute value changes; you can "dynamically" locate the
segment.
Using dynamic segmentation, multiple sets of attributes can be associated with any portion of an
existing linear feature independently of where it begins or ends. These attributes can be displayed,
queried, edited, and analyzed without affecting the underlying linear feature's geometry. A route
feature class is a line feature class that has a defined measurement system. These measurement
values can be used to locate events, assets, and conditions along its set of linear features. In
ArcGIS, the term route refers to any linear feature, such as a city street, highway, river, or pipe that
has a unique identifier and a common measurement system along each linear feature. There are two
primary data types that are used to implement linear referencing in ArcGIS:
 Route feature classes

 Event tables

Using dynamic segmentation, events from event tables are located on line features in a route feature
class.

Figure 8: Road Network Map of Wereta

29
4. STEP-3: INVENTORY OF INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS

Infrastructure Asset Inventory of Wiretap has been compiled after a comprehensive inventory of all
assets, carried out initially by building a set of vector layers in the GIS, using an Ortho-rectified
aerial photograph of the city as the backdrop image and conducting detail inventory of
infrastructure assets by surveying crew on the ground.

Infrastructure Asset Inventory needs large scale index map to understand road, culvert, and other
road side furniture, drainage features, and other categories of infrastructure assets. Accordingly;
index map of the infrastructure inventory has been prepared in 1:200 scale A-1 paper size index
maps. The total index map for the inventory of Road, and Walkway printed for Wereta City
Infrastructure Asset Inventory is one (1) while a total of (one) 1 A-1 size indexed maps were
printed for Urban Drainage Inventory. Moreover, for the collection of Water Supply Network
Assets a total of one (1) A-1 sized index maps were printed for the inventory. There were also
important materials which were used in the infrastructure asset inventory that include:

Global Positioning System (Garmin 72H)

Measuring Tape PVC (50 Meter)
Digital Camera (Nikon Professional Camera)
The summary report of the infrastructure assets presented in the coming sections according to their
strategic areas in which the details are available in the annex table and further details can also be
referred from the wereta AMP Geo-database.

4.1 The Movement Network

4.1.1 Road network

The category road network covers numerous items that are found on the road network. Some of the
items like roads are described as linear elements. Even if infrastructures like road which has a width
are measured linearly, the areal measurement is also conducted for these items. These
infrastructures are also located with a starting and ending point of the road with the local name of
the nodes. The Infrastructure Asset Inventory of wiretap City further revealed that Gravel Road has
the maximum coverage which accounted 42.222 kilometers (46%) followed by Cobble Stone Road
which has a total equivalent length of 16.908 (18%) and while Earth Pressed Road, Asphalt roads

30
and Earthen Road has a total length of 13.682-kilometer (15%), 13.68 kilometers (14%), and 6.17
(7%) Kilometer respectively.

break down of roads based on

persentage
Asphalt
Earthen road
including ERA
7%
Earth Pressed 14%
15%

Cobble Coble
stone Road
18%

Gravel
46%

Figure 9: Percentage of Total Length of Road by Surface Finish

Table 7: Summary Information Required for the Road Asset Category

Road Surface Unit of Surface Percent

Equi_Length
Material Measurement Area %
Asphalt including
KM 12.672 88,704.67 14%
ERA
Cobble Coble stone
KM 16.908 118,360.49 18%
Road
Gravel KM 42.222 295,554.33 46%
Earth Pressed KM 13.682 95,776.88 15%
Earthen road KM 6.17 43,224.33 7%
Total 91.73 641,620.70 100%

31
4.1.2 Pedestrian Walkways

Pedestrian Walkways has also been inventoried for the city of Wereta. All pedestrian walkways
have been changed in to 3 meter equivalent width to change in to kilometer length. The inventory
result reveals that about 1.717 kilometer of the total pedestrian is surfaced with Clay Tile (bazzola).
Besides, the result also revealed that from the total Clay Tile; about 1.717 resides in Primary Road
Street.

Table 8: Summary Information for Pedestrian Walkways

Type of Pedestrian Walk Primary Secondary Local Road and Total (Km)
Way Material Road (KM) Road (KM) Collectors Street
Terrazzo/Clay Tile 1.717 0 0 1.717
Total 1.717 0 0 1.717

Figure 10: Pedestrian Walkway Map

32
4.1.3 Road Structures

Road Structures that include Bridge and Culvert are inventoried in Wereta City Infrastructure Asset
Inventory and Management Plan Project. A total of 176 road structures in which are culvert‘s
structure does find in the city. The locations of this road structures with respects to road hierarchy
and the total inventory owned by the city administration is summarized in the table below. Culverts
are counted and registered in number.

Table 9: Roads Structures by Road Classification.

On Primary On Secondary On Collectors &

Type Total
Road Road Local Road
Bridge 0 0 0 0
Concrete Culvert 19 97 55 171
Steel Culvert 0 5 0 5
Total 19 102 55 176

4.1.4 Street Light

Infrastructures under this category designated on point bases. These infrastructures are also located
with a starting and ending point of the line with the local name of the nodes.

The field survey conducted on street light revealed that there are about 183 street lights in wereta
boundary; all of it is High Pressure Sodium Lamp.

Table 10: Distribution of Street Light by Type

Street Light Type Number Percentage
High pressure Sodium Lamp 183 100
Light Emitting Diode 0 0
Florescent 0 0
CFL 0 0
Total 183 100

Table 11: Street Lights by Road Hierarchy

Street light on Street light on
Street light on Collectors &
Type Primary Road in Secondary Road in No Total
Local Road in No
No
Steel pole 0 0 0 0

33
Wooden
90 50 43 183
pole
Total 90 50 43 183

Figure 11. Street Lights by Road Hierarchy

34
4.1.5 Machinery and Vehicles

Machineries and vehicles composed of different types and operations (construction machines, waste
transporting, abattoir related services, and light office vehicles) are inventoried and their capacity
and operational status are recorded. A total of 14 vehicles were inventoried and the details of it are
clearly depicted in table below.

Table 12: List of Machineries and Vehicles

S.No Name of Machinery Specific Plate Purpose
Machineries and Vehicle Brand / Number Year of
Vehicles Type Mark Purchase

Motor Cycle Motor AM-04

1 Japan Office/Field 2006
Yamaha Cruk Cycle 2580
Motor Cycle Motor
2 Japan AM-4 2579 Office/Field 2005
Yamaha Cruk Cycle
Motor Cycle Motor
3 Japan AM-4 2580 Office/Field 2006
Yamaha Cruk Cycle
Motor Cycle Motor AM -4
4 Japan Office/Field 2006
Yamaha Cruk Cycle 2057
Motor Cycle Motor
5 Japan DM -4 635 Office/Field 2003
Yamaha Cruk Cycle
Motor Cycle Motor
6 Japan DM 2057 Office/Field 2006
Yamaha Cruk Cycle
7 Toyota Pickup Pick UP Japan 183 Multi-Purpose 2004
8 Toyota Pickup Pick UP Japan 177 Multi-Purpose 2001
9 Toyota Pickup Pick UP Japan 187 Carry 2005
10 covra Land cruser toyota service
Road
11 Dump truck Truck
construction
12 Toyota Pickup Pick UP Japan 106 Carry 2006
Road
13 Tagaw Bajaj Bajaje Japan 2013
construction

4.2 Water Supply Network

The water supply system of Warta City mainly comprises production of water at the source
(borehole), transmission of water to reservoirs and distribution of water to customers. The major
assets being used for provision of the water supply service includes Water Pipe Line, Reservoir,

35
Pumps, Valves, Water Wells (Boreholes), Public Water Taps. Accordingly; the inventory result
revealed that, the water Supply Network Asset inventory of Wereta City revealed that the city has
11.801 kilo meter length of transmission line while 19.99 Kilo meter distribution line. Besides, the
Water Supply Bureau of Wereta city has a point location asset which includes public tap (Bono)
with a total count of 9, Reservoir (5), Booster Pumps (3), Submersible Ground Pumps (4)

Table 13: Breakdown of the Water Supply Network by Feature Class

Unit of
Sub Category Quantity Remark
measurement
Water Wale no. 4
Transmission Network Km 11.801
Distribution Network Km 19.99
Booster pump no. 3
Reservoir no. 5
Public tap (Bono) no. 9

The Water Supply Network Asset of wereta City has been with detailed description of each feature
classes like pipe material, pipe diameter, reservoir material and other detailed attributes as presented
in table to follow.

Figure 12: Water Supply Network Map of Wereta City

36
4.3 Environmental Services

Drainages are measured with their length and volume. Similarly, their location has been defined
with the local name of the starting node and ending node where they are found.

4.3.1 The Drainage Network

The asset inventory result revealed that there is a total 30.607 kilometers of drainage line in Wereta
City; of which about 27.128 Km (88.61%) of the drainage lines Open Masonry Drainage 3.389
kilometer (13.39%) is closed masonry Drainage.

Table 14: Drainage Line Feature Class by Road Hierarchy.

Secondar
Drainage Category Primary Road Local Road and Collector TOTA
y Road
type (KM) Street(km) L
(KM)
Open Masonry
13.66 13.468 27.128
Drain
Closed Masonry
2 1.389 3.389
Drain -
Total 2 15.049 13.468 30.607

4.3.2 Inventory of Liquid Waste system and sanitation

Infrastructures that are constructed to improve the sanitation of the city are categorized under this
category. It includes liquid waste, public and communal toilets. The general numbers of the items
are described on the following table.
Table 15: Inventory Result Summary of Sanitation Facilities.
Type of Asset SUB CITY No No of Rooms Area(m2)
Keble 01 2 2 20

Keble 02 4 8 41
Communal Toilets
Keble 03 2 8 36

Keble 04 2 0 0
Total 10 97
Type of Asset SUB CITY No No of Rooms Area(m2)
Keble 01 0 0 0
Public toilet
Keeble 02 4 16 48

37
 Kebele 03 3 9 21
Kebele 04 0 8 24

Total 7 93

Figure 13: Distribution of Sanitation Facilities in Wereta City

4.3.3 Inventory of Solid Waste Management

Solid waste collection systems are conducted by small scale enterprise association through hand
carts, solid waste collection truck to transport the waste. All of the elements have been counted and
registered in total number. The locations of the items are described with their kebeles where they
are found as well as their local name. Regarding solid waste management system of the city, one
open space dumping site with an area of 5.9156 hectares is inventoried. The open space dumping
site is unsanitary, uncontrolled and a treat to the environment not to mention it is adjoined by farm
lands in which the effects of the dumping site is clearly observable.

38
Table 16: Inventory Result Summary of Solid Waste Management Facilities

Asset_Sub_Catagory Asset Name No

Solid Waste Facility Open Space Solid Waste Dump Site 1

Solid Waste Facility Hand cart 12

Solid Waste Facility Solid waste collection truck 1

Solid Waste Facility Dust bins 14

4.3.4 Inventory of Urban Greenery

Urban greeneries inventoried in the boundary of Wereta city included in four Keble are 18 in
number covering a total of 1.865 hectare of land among this greenery most of it is developed. One
Seedling site covering 0.061 hectares found in Keble 03 is also included in this category.

Table 17: Inventory Result Summary of Urban Greenery.

Sub Category Unit Of Measurement No Quantity(hectare) Remark

Street side greenery strip hectare 12 0.395

Community greenery hectare 2 1.865

Play field hectare 2 1.908
Recreational areas hectare 1 0.67
Seeding site hectare 1 0.061
Total 18 4.899

4.4 Social and Economic Services

4.4.1 Inventory of Administration Facilities

The administration offices and related service buildings included in the inventory comprises of the
city administration office, sectorial offices and Sub City administration offices with their inter-
related services within the above-mentioned compounds such as stores, cafeterias and toilets. A
total of 12 administrative institutes were inventoried that are currently providing services for
Wereta City with their 32 buildings that are located at a total area of 5,104.30 square meter of built-
up space.

39
Table 18: Inventory Result Summary of Administration Facilities
S/n Admin_Office Name No Blocks Area (m2)

1 Wereta City Administration Office 5 688.168

2 Wereta Justice Bureau 5 1,414.11
3 Wereta Water Supply Office 5 891.13
4 Kebele 01 Office 2 410.5
5 Kebele 02 Office 2 131.436
6 Kebele 03 Office 2 85.68
7 Kebele 04 Office 2 139.4368
8 Wereta Main Police Station 3 196.68
Wereta Revenue, urban agriculture, women and
9 2 454.19
children
Wereta construction and housing
10 2 317.25
DEVELOPMENT
11 Small scale enterprise office 1 182.8
12 Amhara Democracy Party Office 1 192.92

Tota 32 5,104.30

Figure 14: Sample Distribution of Administration Institutes in all 4 Kebeles of Wereta

40
4.4.2 Inventory of Educational Facilities

Wereta City Administration possess 7 educational institutes in its boundary, comprising of 3

kindergartens, 2 primary schools,1 secondary and preparatory school, 1 TVET colleges. A total of
66 buildings are registered covering a total area of 17,267.87 square meter of land. Wereta TVET
College takes the largest share with 17 buildings that sits on 5,350.73 m2 of plinth area. The details
of each educational institute are listed under the table below.

Table 19: Inventory Result Summary of Educational Facilities

S/n SC_Name School_Id School Level No_Blocks Area(m2)
1 Estaiber Kindergarten WO_ED_01 Kindergarten 3 591.28
2 Leganbo(02) Kindergarten WO_ED_02 Kindergarten 1 39.5
3 Menehar(03) Kindergarten WO_ED_03 Kindergarten 1 29.65
4 Weretaprimery school WO_ED_04 Primary school 13 2,981.70
5 Dudmegn Primary School WO_ED_05 Primary School 14 3,549.76
Wereta secondary and
6
preparatory school
WO_ED_06 Secondary &preparatory 17 4,725.11
7 Wereta TVET College WO_ED_07 VET College 17 5,350.73
Total 66 17,267.87

Figure 15: Sample Inventors of Educational Institutes of Wereta

41
4.4.3 Inventory of Health Facilities

One health centers are inventoried and registered that is currently in the service having 13 buildings and
covering 1,974.10m2 area.

Table 20: Inventory Result Summary of Health Facilities

H_Ins_Name Level Health_Id No_Blocks Area(m2)
Health
1 Wereta Health Center
Center
WO_H_01 13 1,974.10

Total 13 1,974.10

Figure 16: Sample Distribution Map of the Health Centre in Wereta

42
4.4.4 Inventory of Youth Centre’s

In the category of Youth center, wereta City Administration has one Youth centers among this
Model Youth center is the Biggest in both services to provide service to the city. Collectively the
youth centers have 4 buildings and 632.0635m2 area coverage.

Table 21: Inventory Result Summary of Youth Centre‘s

Asset_Sub_Catagory Municipal_Service_Name Oth_MU_Id No block Area(m2)

1 Youth Center Youth Center WO_YC_01 4 632.0635

TOTAL 4 632.0635

Figure 17: Distribution of Youth Centre‘s in Wereta City

4.4.5 Inventory of MSE Facilities

MSE premises in the city mostly take the shape of cluster, shades and shops distributed through the
city. A total of 17 MSE buildings were inventoried for urban agriculture covering an area of

43
3,196.51 square meter of built-up space, these buildings collectively have 13 blocks for Milking and
fattening cattle spaces. For shopping there are 4 blocks which has total area of 1,532.01 m2. The
details of MSE premises organized in sub cities are listed in the table below.

Table 22: Inventory Result Summary of MSE Facilities

Name MSE _Id No of Blocks Area(m2)
MSE shade for urban
1 13 3,196.51
agriculture WO_MSE_01
2 Container shops WO_MSE_02 4 1,532.50
TOTAL 17 4,729.01

Figure 18: Distribution of MSE Facilities in Wereta city

4.4.6 Inventory of Housing Facilities

Municipal housing facilities that are distributed in the city having 125 housing buildings covering
6,069.08square meters of built-up space have been inventoried, this number is composed of housing
buildings and their ancillary services i.e., service quarters and toilet facilities. Since the construction
nature of the blocks, the number 125 doesn‘t imply the corresponding household in possession,
rather it is the building blocks that are inventoried in this category. One block can be shared ranging

44
from two up to six households in the case of the main housing buildings and service quarters and
toilet can be shared to a maximum of 4HHs, depending on the layout and arrangement of the
neighborhood.

Table 23: Inventory Result Summary of Housing Facilities.

S/n Name Id No Area(m2)
1 Kebele01 WO_KHO_1 64 2,160.12
2 Keble 02 WO_KHO_2 29 2,371.69
3 Keble 03 WO_KHO_3 17 1,248.32
4 Keble 04 WO_KHO_4 15 288.65
TOTAL 125 6,069.08

4.4.7 Inventory of Abattoir Facility

Two abattoir facilities in different place is inventoried, but the old one is closed not giving service
for the city because it is not environmental and social friendly. The new under construction is a
modern facility that can fulfill the intended services once the facilities construction is completed.

Table 24: Inventory Result Summary of Abattoir Facility

Name Id No Blocks Area(m2)
Abattoir Facility WO_AB_01 4 168.199
TOTAL 4 168.199

Figure 19: Inventoried Abattoir facility (the New Abattoir Facilities)

45
4.4.8 Inventory of Other Municipal Facilities

This category embraces facilities like wereta Bus station, Playgrounds and stadium. Totally the
category has 2 building and 150.62 m2 area coverage and high school fence , bus station fence and
Health Center fence length 352.07m length,193.29m length and 292.11m Length respectively.

Table 25: Inventory Result Summary of Other Municipal Facilities

Asset_Sub_Catagory
1 Other Municipal Asset
2 Other Municipal Asset
3 Other Municipal Asset
4 Other Municipal Asset
Area(m2)
Municipal_Service_Name Oth_MU_Id No
&m
Wereta Bus Station fence WO_OT_04 1 193.29metere
High School Fence WO_OT_03 1 352.36 meter
Woreta Health Center Fence WO_OT_05 1 292.11metre
Wereta Bus Station office WO_OT_01 2 150.62m2

46
5. Step-4: ASSESS THE CONDITION OF ASSETS

Assessing asset condition may require benchmarking, i.e.; the development of quality/standards
profiles against which the assets can be measured. With above ground assets, this will generally
take the form of visual inspection, although in some cases it may also involve mechanical testing. A
road for example needs to have some definition of the types of deterioration that occurs and a
quantitative description of what constitutes the different levels of deterioration. Therefore, we used
a five-point scale for condition assessment. For instance, for asphalt road, the following indicators
of deteriorations are investigated on the ground: pot holes, cracking, surface wear out, sliding and
differential settlement. Accordingly, a five-point scale can be used as one of the recommended scale
as per the Asset Management Manual prepared by the Ministry of Urban Development and
Housing.

In doing so, detailed quality indicators for condition assessment of each asset infrastructure were
developed and data collection is made accordingly. Simple condition assessments for road,
drainage, walk ways, street light, culverts and over passes asset infrastructure are described as
indicated in the table below.

Table 26 point condition indicator for point feature assets

Level Descriptor General Description

1 very good used for new assets for the first year
2 good only routine and periodic maintenance procedures required
3 moderate noticeable deterioration, but relatively simple maintenance
4 poor serious deterioration, or damage, requiring more complex maintenance
5 very poor decommissioning, or replacement, of the asset

Table 27 Condition Indicator table for Point Feature Assets: Mechanical Features.

Level Descriptor General Description

1 very good used for new assets for the first year
2 good only routine and periodic maintenance procedures required
3 moderate minor faults (e.g. leaking water standpipes) or poor operation (e.g.
difficulty in opening or closing valves)
4 poor major component replacement required
5 very poor decommissioning or replacement of the asset

Table 28 Condition Indicator table for Point Feature Assets: Structural Features

47
 Level Descriptor General description
1 very good used for new assets for the first year
2 good only routine and periodic maintenance procedures required
3 moderate specific faults that require repair, such as leaking joints (for
manholes) or damages walls or toilets (for communal toilets)
4 poor major component replacement required
5 very poor Decommissioning, damage or deterioration such that the asset is no
longer able to perform its function effectively

Table 29Condition Indicator table for Point Feature Assets: Vehicles Plant and Machinery

level descriptor general description

1 very good used for new assets for the first year
2 good can be repaired with routine and periodic maintenance up to 80% of
EUL (expected useful life)
3 moderate specific faults that require repair, such as leaking joints (for
manholes) or damages walls or toilets (for communal toilets)
4 poor up to 80% of EUL where the cost of repairs is considered to be in
excess of routine and periodic maintenance costs; or 80-100% of
EUL with reasonable cost of repairs for an aging vehicle
5 very poor decommissioning. or up to 80% of EUL where the cost of repairs is
considered to be in excess of routine and periodic maintenance costs;
or 80-100% of EUL with reasonable cost of repairs for an aging
vehicle

Table 30Method of measurement of deterioration types for asphalt roads

Deterioration Type Method of Measurement

cracking area measurement. length*width. width measurement 30cm
either side of crack.
surface peeling area measurement. bounding rectangle around the area of
peeling. minimum dimensions 1m*1m.
potholes area measurement. bounding rectangle around the area of the
pothole. minimum dimensions 2m*2m.
Note: larger areas of deterioration may require a hot-mix asphalt layer.

Table 31Method of measurement of deterioration types for cobblestone roads

48
 Deterioration Type Method of Measurement
lifting of cobblestones area measurement. bounding rectangle around the damaged area.
minimum dimensions based upon lifting all cobblestones back to
undamaged sections.
surface depression area measurement. bounding rectangle around the damaged area,
back to an area of undisturbed cobblestones.
failure of cobblestone linear measurement. length of the the damaged area, back to
edging (50*50*70mm) undisturbed cobblestones on either side.
Table 32Method of measurement of deterioration types for gravel & red-ash roads

Deterioration Type Method of Measurement

channelling channel width no more than 20cm. area measurement.
length*width. minimum width 30cm.
potholes area measurement. bounding rectangle around the area of the
pothole. Minimum dimensions 2m*2m.
wash-away channel width greater than 30cm wide. area measurement.
length*width.
Table 33Method of measurement of deterioration types for compacted earth roads

Deterioration Type Method of Measurement

surface depression/ area measurement. bounding rectangle around the area
potholes of the pothole. minimum dimensions 2m*2m.
channelling/wash-away area measurement. length*width. minimum width
30cm

Table 34 Condition Indicator Table for linear feature assets: Roads, cycle paths, footpaths, paved
areas and roundabouts – all road surface types

Level Rating Scale Condition Indicator

1 very good condition as new. no significant defects
2 good less than 5% of the total road surface area suffers deterioration
3 moderate between 6% and 20% of the total road surface area suffers deterioration
4 poor between 21% and 50% of the total road surface area suffers deterioration
5 very poor greater than 50% of the total road surface area suffers deterioration

Table 35 Condition Indicator Table for linear feature assets: Cobblestone road edging

Level Rating Scale Condition Indicator

1 very good condition as new. no significant defects
2 good less than 5% of the total cobblestone road edging length suffers deterioration
3 moderate between 6% and 20% of the total cobblestone road edging length suffers

49
 deterioration
between 21% and 50% of the total cobblestone road edging length suffers
4 poor
deterioration
greater than 50% of the cobblestone road edging length area suffers
5 very poor
deterioration

Table 36Method of measurement of deterioration types for masonry drains (channels)

Deterioration Type Method of Measurement

surface mortar stripping area measurement. length*width. bounding rectangle around
from joints or the top of the area of the damage.
the walls
serious damage to joints or area measurement. length*width. bounding rectangle around
scouring in the bed of the the area of the damage.
channel
masonry blocks breaking area measurement. length*width. bounding rectangle around
lose from the walls the area of the damage.
Table 37Condition Indicator Table for linear feature assets: Drainage Channels

Level Rating Scale Condition Indicator

1 very good shape of drain still in original design condition
less than 5% of the channel length suffers deterioration, either on the walls
2 good
or the floor
: between 6% and 20% of the channel length suffers deterioration, either on
3 moderate
the walls or the floor
between 21% and 50% of the channel length suffers deterioration, either on
4 poor
the walls or the floor
greater than 50% of the channel length suffers deterioration, either on the
5 very poor
walls or the floor

Table 38General condition indicator for water mains

Level Descriptor General Description

1 very good 71-100% EUL
2 good 46-70% EUL
3 fair 26-45% EUL
4 poor 11-25% EUL
5 very poor 0-10% EUL
Table 39A condition indicator for water mains based upon the frequency of pipe failures

50
 Level Descriptor General Description
1 very good no failures; complies with engineering standards
2 good few failures. few areas not complying with engineering standards
3 fair failures begin to occur. significant areas not complying with engineering
standards
4 poor regular failures occurring and significant corrosion. increased operating
costs result and many pipes need to be replaced
5 very poor significant failures and should be substantially reconstructed

Table 40 Physical condition indicator for polygon features: rivers

Level Descriptor General Description

1 very good pristine condition
2 good no significant deterioration to the river course and banks
3 moderate noticeable deterioration, with damage showing to the river course and
banks
4 poor more widespread deterioration, or damage, requiring some rehabilitation
5 very poor extensive deterioration requiring major rehabilitation
Table 41 General condition indicator for polygon features: natural features; greenery; open spaces;
water bodies

Level Descriptor General Description

1 very good pristine condition
2 good only routine and periodic maintenance procedures required
3 moderate not used
4 poor serious deterioration, or damage, requiring some rehabilitation
5 very poor decommissioning, or major rehabilitation

Table 42Condition Indicator Table for Polygon feature assets: Bridges; Culverts; Reservoirs
(adapted from the International Asset Management Guidelines)

51
 Level Rating Scale Condition Indicator
sound physical condition. Asset likely to perform adequately without major
1 very good
work for 25 years or more.
acceptable physical condition; minimal short-term failure risk but potential for
2 good
deterioration in long-term (10 years plus). only minor work required (if any).
surface damage starting to occur, though not yet affecting the structural
3 moderate
integrity. requires significant maintenance.
significant deterioration becoming evident. no immediate risk to health or
4 poor safety but works required within 2 years to ensure asset remains safe.
substantial work required in short-term, asset barely serviceable.
serious structural damage. health and safety hazards exist which present a
5 very poor possible risk to public safety or asset cannot be serviced/operated without risk
to personnel. replacement required urgently.

Table 43Condition Indicator Table for Polygon feature assets: buildings and facilities

Level Rating Scale Condition Indicator: Maintenance Condition Indicator: Customers

1 very good well maintained and clean. no customer concerns.
increased maintenance inspection required. deterioration causes minimal influence on
2 good occupational uses. occasional customer
concerns.
regular and programmed maintenance some deterioration beginning to be reflected
3 moderate inspections essential. in minor restrictions on operational uses.
customer concerns.
frequent maintenance inspections essential.
regular customer complaints.
4 poor short term element
replacement/rehabilitation.
minimum life expectancy, requiring urgent Generally not suitable for use by customers.
5 very poor
rehabilitation or replacement.

5.1 Condition Assessment Results for Movement Network

The above-mentioned condition indicators were used for Asset Inventory and the results of each
category of asset are shown in the following sections.

5.1.1 Condition Assessment for Road Asset

Condition Assessment had been done using the revised Asset Management Operational manual of
Ministry of Urban Development and Housing (MUDH) five level condition indicators and
deterioration type of each segment and area were captured. Accordingly, the inventory result
52
revealed that from the total Asphalt, Cobble roads, gravel, Earthen pressed and Earthen roads; about
2.1%, 4.42%, 14.88%, 31.54%and 44.13% of their surface area has been deteriorated respectively.

Road Surface Deterioration Deterioration

Surface Area (m2)
Material Area(m2) Percentage

Asphalt 1,861.19 88,704.67 2.10%

Cobble 5,111.43 115,742.12 4.42%
Gravel 43,986.83 295,554.33 14.88%
Earthen Pressed 30,208.52 95,776.88 31.54%
Earthen Road 19,072.85 43,224.33 44.13%

The Infrastructure Asset Inventory Result of Wereta City Road further revealed that from the total
Wereta City Asphalt Road 12.663-kilometer length, about 12.53 kilometer is in good condition while
from the total cobble road 16.998 about, 2.1699 kilo meter is in good condition On the other, 0.7129
kilometer of Earthen Pressed Road and 4.2084 km gravel road is in Good Condition respectively. The
details of road surface condition assessment can be referred from the table below.

Table 44 Road Feature Class by Condition

Condition Result
Road
Feature Total
Class Good Moderate Poor Very Poor
Very Good (km)
(km) (km) (km) (km) (KM)

Asphalt - 12.53 0.133 0 0 12.663

Cobble 10.705864 2.1699 3.6115 0.4526 0.0406 16.98
Gravel 12.489 4.1314 14.2572 9.9761 1.3673 42.221
Earthen
0.11655 0.7129 4.8067 6.1637 1.8824 13.682
pressed
Earthen - 0 0.6474 3.998 1.5292 6.1746
Total 23.311414 19.5442 23.4558 20.5904 4.8195 91.721

53
Figure 20: road network events

5.1.2 Condition Assessment for Road Structures

A total of 176 Culverts are inventoried in Woreta City. The table below will discuss the condition
assessment of Culverts belongs to the city. From the total 176 Culverts; about 115 are in very good
are, 17 Moderate conditions, and 34 poor and 10 very poor.

Table 45: Road Structures Condition Assessment

Road Structure Condition

Number
Type Very Good Good Moderate Poor Very Poor
Concrete Culvert 171 110 0 17 34 10
Steel Culvert 5 5 0 0 0 0
Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 176 115 0 17 34 10

54
5.1.3 Condition Result of Pedestrian Walkway

Condition Assessment for Pedestrian walkways has also been done for Wereta City and the
inventory condition assessment shows that from the total 1.717 -kilometer walkways; about 1.531-
kilometer length are in a very good condition and 0.186-kilometer length is in good condition. The
rest of the condition assessments for all pedestrian walkways are depicted in table below.

Table 46: Condition Assessment for Pedestrian Walkway

Type of Pedestrian Walkway Material Condition by Kilo Meter (KM)
Walkway Material Total(km) Very Good Good Moderate Poor Very Poor
mjjdjdd(ii(
Terrazzo/Clay Tile (Length(K
1.717 1.531 0.186 0 0 0
M)
Total 1.717 1.531 0.186 0 0 0

5.1.4 Condition Result ofStreet Lights

Condition Assessment for Street Lights has also been done for Wereta City and the inventory
condition assessment shows that from the total 183 wooden poles; about 169 are functional
condition and 14 are nonfunctional. The rest of the condition assessments for all streetlights are
depicted in table below.

Table 47: Street Lights by Road Hierarchy

Total Non
Type functional
Number functional
Steel pole 0 0 0 0
Wooden pole 183 169 14 183
Total 183 169 14 183
5.2 Condition Assessment for Water Supply

Condition Assessment for Water Supply Network was also done though it is very difficult since the
water supply pipes (water supply transmission and distribution line) are buried below the surface of
the earth. Therefore, condition assessment for water supply network was done in consultation with
the professionals from water supply office of wereta city by considering the age of installation and
other important parameters. The Water Supply Network Assets where their condition was
inventoried as depicted in the table below.

55
Table 48: Water Line Condition Assessment

Condition
Water Supply Total Length Diameter
No Type
Sub Category No (km) (mm) Very Very
Good Good Moderate Poor
Poor
(km) (KM) (KM)
(KM) (KM)
PVC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Transmission GSP 9.159 150-200 8.289 0.87 0 0 0
1 Pipe line
Network HDPE 2.6422 100-250 2.6422 0 0 0 0
DCI 0 200 0 0 0 0 0
PVC 3.841829 50-200 0 0 3.841829 0 0
Distribution GSP 8.829423 50-110 0 1.879 6.950199 0 0
Pipe line
Network HDPE 7.32479 50-110 3.306178 3.293 0.725379 0 0
DCI 0 100-200 0 0 0 0 0
Concrete 9 0 1 0 1 7
3 Public Tab
Masonry 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Booster Pump GSP 3 2 1 0 0 0
Deep
5 Water Wale 4 150-300 4 0 0 0 0
Well
Concrete 4 50-2000 3 1 0 0 0
6 Reservoirs
steel 1 100 1 0 0 0

5.3 Condition Assessment for Environmental Services

5.3.1 Condition Assessment for Drainage

Condition Assessment had been done using the revised Asset Management Operational manual of
the Ministry of Urban Development and Housing (MUDH) five level condition indicators.
Accordingly, the inventory result revealed that the total of 30.608 -kilometer drainage is found in
wereta city; the details of each drainage type versus condition assessment are depicted in the table
below.

Table 49: Surface Drainage Condition Assessment

Total
Drainage Condition Length
Category (km)
(Type) Very Good Poor Very Poor
Good (km) Moderate (km)
(km) (km) (km)

56
 Closed
0.386067 0.492869 1.451629 1.058606 0 3.38917
Masonry Drain
Open Masonry
16.017175 1.983032 7.261352 1.858565 0.09866 27.2188
Drain
Total 16.403242 2.475901 8.712981 2.917171 0.09866 30.608

5.3.2 Condition Assessment of Sanitation

As part of the liquid waste management system, among the existing public and communal toilet
facilities majority lies in moderate condition wing to the recent construction date. However, those
serving for long period of time are deteriorated and unsanitary to serve the community.

Figure 21: Distribution of Sanitation Facilities in Wereta City

Table 50: Condition Assessment Summary of Sanitation Facilities

Asset Sub Category Name No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe Total
Communal Toilets Kebele 01 2 No 0 0 0 2 0 2

57
 Kebele 02 4 No 0 0 0 4 0 4
Kebele 03 2 No 0 1 0 1 0 2
Kebele 04 2 No 0 0 0 1 1 2
Kebele 01 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kebele 02 4 No 0 0 3 1 0 4
Public toilet
Kebele 03 3 No 0 0 1 2 0 3
Kebele 04 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 17 No 0 1 4 11 1 17

60
sanitation facility
64.705
50

40

30
23.52

20

5.88
10 0.00 11 5.88
4
0 1 1
0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe

no.of block percentage

Figure 22: Condition Assessment Summary of Sanitation Facilities in Wereta City

58
 5.3.3 Condition Assessment of Solid Waste Management

The existing open and uncontrolled solid waste dumping site is not only improper but highly
saturated and unsanitary dumping site which is found in state of poor and a potential threat to
human health and urban environment.

Table 51: Condition Assessment Summary of Solid Waste Management Facilities

Asset_Sub Total
Asset Name ID Condition
_Catagory Area/ NO
Solid Open Space Very Very
WO_SW_0 poor Moderate Good
Waste Solid Waste 59,156.31 poor Good
1
Facility Dump Site 0 59156.31 0 0 0
Solid Waste
Hand cart HC 12 4 8 10 0 0
Facility

Solid Waste
Dust bins DB 14 0 6 8 0 0
Facility

5.3.4 Condition Assessment of Urban Greenery

Urban Greeneries in the city mostly lies in Moderate condition even if they are recently commenced
due to lack of management and proper protection with 100% is found in the state of Moderate.

Table 52 Condition Assessment Summary of Urban Greenery

Asset Sub
Location No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe
Category
Community
Keble(01,03) 2 No 0 0 2 0 0
Greeneries
Recreational areas
Keble04 1 No 0 0 1 0 0
Greenery
Street side Around main
1 No 0 1 0 0
Greenery Asphalt
Seedling Site Kebele 03 1 No 0 0 1 0 0
Play Field kebele(03,01) 2 No 0 0 2 0

59
 Condition Assesment of Urban Greenery
10
9
8
7
No of Parcel

6
5
4
3
2
1
0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe
Series1 0 0 9 9 0

Figure 23: Condition Assessment Summary of Urban Greenery in Woreta City

5.4 Condition Assessment of Social and Economic Services

5.4.1 Condition Assessment of Administration Facilities

Among the inventoried administrative buildings in the city 43.75 % are in good condition where as 43.75 %
in the moderate condition and 12.5% poor condition collectively. Since these institutes are providing service
with limited no of buildings their rehabilitation is crucial.

Table 53 Condition Assessment Summary of Administration Facilities

1Admin_Office_Name Id No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe Total

Wereta City No 0 2 1 2 0 5
WO_AD_01 5
Administration_ Percent 0.00% 40.00% 20.00% 40.00% 0.00% 100.00%
No 0 2 2 1 0 5
Wereta Justice Bureau WO_AD_02 5
Percent 20.00% 40.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% 100.00%
No 0 4 1 0 0 5
Wereta Water Supply Office WO_AD_03 5
Percent 0.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Kebele 01 Office WO_AD_04 2 No 0 0 2 0 0 2

60
 Percent 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
No 0 0 1 1 0 2
Kebele 02 Office WO_AD_05 2
Percent 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 100.00%
No 0 0 2 0 0 2
Kebele 03 Office WO_AD_06 2
Percent 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
No 0 0 2 0 0 2
Kebele 04 Office WO_AD_07 2
Percent 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Wereta Revenue, urban No 0 1 1 0 0
agriculture, women and WO_AD_08 2 2
children Percent 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Wereta Construction and No 0 1 1 0 0
Housing Development WO_AD_09 2 2
Office Percent 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Wereta Main Police Station No 0 0 2 1 0 3
WO_AD_10 3
Office Percent 0.00% 0.00% 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 100.00%
No 0 1 0 0 0 1
Small scale enterprise Office WO_AD_11 1
Percent 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Amhara Democracy Party No 0 0 1 0 0 1
WO_AD_12 1
Office Percent 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Total 32 11 16 5 0 32

18
Administrative Facility
16
14
12
Percentage

10
8
6
4
2
0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe
No.Block 0 11 16 5 0
Percentage 0.00% 34.38% 50.00% 15.63% 0.00%

61
 Figure 24: Condition Assessment Summary of Administrative Facilities in Woreta City

5.4.2 Condition Assessment of Educational Facilities

The Status of buildings in this category listed in detail in the table below, which shows building
conditions under each educational institute. In summary from the total of 64 education service
giving buildings 27 buildings which is 42% are found above moderate condition. The remaining 15
buildings which are 29% in good, 5 buildings which are 8% in very good state and 16 buildings
which are 25 % found in poor state.

Table 54: Condition Assessment Summary of Educational Facilities

N V.Goo Modera Sever
SC_Name School_Id Good Poor Total
o d te e
Estaiber
No 0 1 2 0 0
Kindergarten WO_ED_ 3
1 3
Leganbo(02) 01 Perce 33.33 0.00 100.00
0.00% 66.67% 0.00%
Kindergarten nt % % %
No 0 0 1 0 0 1
Menehar(03) WO_ED_
2 1 Perce 100.00 0.00 100.00
Kindergarten 02 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
nt % % %
Guaya Primary
No 0 2 8 3 0
School WO_ED_ 13
3 13
Wereta primary 03 Perce 15.38 23.08 0.00 100.00
0.00% 61.54%
school nt % % % %
No 0 4 10 3 0 17
WO_ED_
4 Wereta TVET College 17 Perce 23.53 17.65 0.00 100.00
04 0.00% 58.82%
nt % % % %
No 0 0 1 0 0 1
Leganbo(02) WO_ED_
5 1 Perce 100.00 0.00 100.00
Kindergarten 05 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
nt % % %
Wereta primary
No 1 2 6 5 0
school WO_ED_ 14
6 14
Dudmegn Primary 06 Perce 14.29 35.71 0.00
7% 42.86%
School nt % % % 100%
No 2 2 6 7 0 17
Wereta secondary and WO_ED_
7 17 Perce 11.76 11.76 41.18 0.00 100.00
preparatory school 07 35.29%
nt % % % % %
Tot
66 3 11 34 18 0 66
al

62
 40
34
35

30

25

20 18

15
11
10

5 3
4.55% 16.67% 51.52% 27.27% 0 0.00%
0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Very Poor
No.Block Percentage

Figure 25: Condition Assessment Summary of Educational Facilities in Woreta CITY

5.4.3 Condition Assessment of Health Facilities

Health service buildings in the city is the one health centers holding a total 13 buildings, 3 of its in
very good condition, 5 of the buildings are in good condition, 3 are in moderate condition.

Table 55: Condition Assessment Summary of Health Facilities

H_Ins_Name Health_Id No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe
No of Block 0 7 4 2 0
Wereta Health Center WO_H_01 13
Percent 0.00% 53.85% 30.77% 15.38% 0.00%

63
 Woreta Health Building Facility
8
7
6
Percentage

5
4
3
2
1
0
Moderat
V.Good Good Poor Severe
e
No of Block 0 7 4 2 0
Percent 0.00% 53.85% 30.77% 15.38% 0.00%

Figure 26: Condition Assessment Summary of Health Facilities in Woreta City.

5.4.4 Condition Assessment of Youth Centers

Among the one youth centers in the city is inventoried and assessed holding a total of 4 buildings 2
of them are in good and 1 very good condition with the remaining 1building are found in moderate
condition.

Table 56 Condition Assessment Summary of Youth centers.

Id No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe

Name
No 0 1 1 2 0
Wereta Youth center WO_YC_01 4
Percent 0.00% 25.00% 25.00% 50.00% 0.00%

64
 Condition Asesment of Youth Center
2.5

1.5
Percent

0.5

0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe
No 0 1 1 2 0
Percent 0.00% 25.00% 25.00% 50.00% 0.00%

Figure 27: Condition Assessment Summary of Youth Center

5.4.5 Condition Assessment of MSE Facilities

Majority of Buildings in this category exhibits good , moderate and Poor condition with a share of 5
, 7 and 3 buildings are in this status respectively. 2 building is in very good conditions

Table 57: Condition Assessment Summary of MSE Facilities.

Name MSE_Id No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe Total
MSE shade for urban No 2 3 5 3 0 13
WO_MSE_01 13
agriculture Percent 15% 23% 38% 23.08% 0.00% 100%
No 0 2 2 0 0 4
Container shop MSE WO_MSE_02 4
Percent 0% 50% 50% 0.00% 0.00% 100%
Total 17 2 5 7 3 0 17

65
 Condition Asesment Of MSE Facility
8
7
6
Percentage

5
4
3
2
1
0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Very Poor
No.Block 2 5 7 3 0
Percentage 11.76% 29.41% 41.18% 17.65% 0.00%

Figure 28: Condition Assessment Summary of MSE Facilities in Woreta City

5.4.6 Condition Assessment of Housing Facilities

Housing facilities in the city which are constructed in similar time period and construction
materials, this is reflected in their condition also with is 91.66 in very good condition and 8.34% are
in poor conditions.

Table 58: Condition Assessment Summary of Housing Facilities

S/n Name No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe

No 11 2 31 20 0
1 Kebele01 Housing 64
Percent 88.89% 11.11% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
No 6 3 13 7 0
2 Kebele02 29
Percent 90.69% 4.65% 4.65% 0.00% 0.00%
No 5 3 6 3 0
3 Kebele03 Housing 17
Percent 88.46% 11.36% 0% 0.00% 0.00%
No 2 0 2 11 0
4 Kebele04 Housing 15
Percent 100% 0% 0% 0% 0.00%

66
 Condition Asesment Of Hausing Facility
60

50

40
Percentage

30

20

10

0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe
No.Block 24 8 52 41 0
Percentage 19.20% 6.40% 41.60% 32.80% 0.00%

Figure 29: Condition Assessment Summary of Housing Facilities in Woreta City

5.4.7 Condition Assessment of Abattoir Facility

Two abattoir facilities in different place is inventoried, but the old one is closed not giving service
for the city because it is not environmental and social friendly. The new under construction is a
modern facility that can fulfill the intended services once the facilities construction is completed.

Table 59: Condition Assessment Summary of Abattoir Facility.

Name No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe
Wereta Abattoir No 0 0 2 2
4
Facility Percent 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00%

67
 Condition Asesment of Abiyator Facility
2.5

2
Percentage

1.5

0.5

0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe
No 0 0 2 2
Percent 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00%

Figure 30: Condition Assessment Summary of Abattoir Facilities in Woreta City

5.4.8 Condition Assessment of Other Municipal Facilities

Other municipal asset category condition assessment result shows that 3 building [100%] are in
Good condition and Woreta Health Center fence in 100% in Very good condition.

Table 60: Condition Assessment Summary of Other Municipal Facilities.

Municipal_Servi
No V.Good Good Moderate Poor Severe Total
ce_Name
Wereta Bus Length=193. No 0 1 0 0 0 1
1
Station fence 29metere Percent 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
High School Length=352. No 0 1 0 0 0 1
2
Fence 36 meter Percent 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
No 1 0 0 0 0 1
Woreta Health Length=292.
3 100.00
Center Fence 11metre Percent 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
% 100.00%
No 0 1 0 1 0 2
Wereta Bus
4 2 50.00
Station office Percent 0.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00%
% 100.00%
Total 5 1 3 0 1 0 5

68
 Condition Asesement of Other Muinicipal
Facility
3.5

2.5
Percentage

1.5

0.5

0
V.Good Good Moderate Poor Very Poor
No.Block 1 3 0 1 0
Percentage 20.00% 60.00% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00%

Figure 31 Condition Assessment Summary of Abattoir Facilities in Woreta City

69
6. Step-5: DEVELOP A MAINTENANCE BUDGET GUIDE FOR EACH ASSET
6.1 Introduction

The development and expansion of infrastructure network and urban facilities require sustainable
maintenance management. Preserving and maintaining the existing infrastructure assets while with
incremental infrastructural and facility development of the city should thus be a basic and integral
part of the initiative to establish modern asset management function.

Thus, along with development efforts to increa se investments in infrastructure and vital urban
elements; the city expected to strive to establish a sustained short to long-term programs of
investment in maintenance.

Existing maintenance approaches of the city, like most of the cities and towns have been
characterized by inadequate maintenance funding. In addition to poor attitude to maintenance,
absence of regular condition inspection often make difficulty to identify the maintenance need and
determine the fund actually needed.

In an attempt to combat the poor maintenance performance of the municipality and sustaining and
responsibly managing the most valuable and critical assets; the maintenance need for all the city
existing assets is identified. It is supposed that the maintenance budget guide will also be a turning
point to systematically plan for, and continually invest in maintenance and renewal and eventually
for development and application of modern maintenance management system.

6.2 Determining the Maintenance Types

The maintenance approaches that should be exercised, as per the AMP manual, are mainly two
types. The first is normal maintenance measure that can be preventive, routine and periodic and
should be act upon with the goal to retain and preserve ‗good‘ performing assets.

The second type of maintenance that is the center of the preparation of this maintenance budget
guide is to address the accumulated maintenance gap and restore the deteriorated assets to bring to
the desired good condition level. It is entirely targeted to eliminate the maintenance backlog and
deficits accumulated over the years.

70
Correspondingly Maintenance expenditure is therefore estimated for both routine and periodic
maintenance and to eliminate accumulated maintenance backlogs.

In addition, attempt, has made to identify and address rehabilitation, renewal and replacement
requirement of the assets, which are reported severely deteriorated to return their service
potential to condition level it had originally had. Along with estimating the maintenance budget
need, the possible maintenance activities are identified almost for all of the assets included in the
inventory and condition assessments. Most of the proposed maintenance activities are directly
adapted from the revised AMP manual. In addition, because the manual is not expected to be
exhaustive to provide the entire possible maintenance activities attempt has made to review other
relevant sources including local experiences and literatures.

6.3 Maintenance Rate

Many efforts have been exerted to establish the maintenance unit rate by gathering data from
different sources to set as initial base line rate that would be improved and fine-tune based on actual
experiences, historical costs and tender unit values.

Including AMP document of the city itself, various sources are reviewed to set baseline
maintenance rates for major infrastructure assets including Amhara Building Works Construction
Enterprise and Amhara Water Works Construction Enterprise, Amhara Road Works Enterprise,
Amhara Urban Development Housing and Construction Bureau and the Municipality‘s different
core process offices and departments. Maintenance practice of those enterprises and bureaus are
deeply reviewed and checked. In compliant with the revised AMP manual, unit rate for different
feature class of an asset specific to each maintenance activity are employed. For buildings
internationally employed industrial standard methods are adapted that is a fixed percentage of
investment or replacement cost method. For water supply network asset also a fixed percentage of
investment or replacement cost method is employed; considering the remaining useful life for
below ground assets. The same is applied for the rest of non-infrastructure assets, including
movable assets.

Accordingly, the following tables present the estimated baseline maintenance rate supposing that
the municipality should record actual maintenance expenditure to fine-tune the proposed rates
annually.

71
Table 61: Maintenance Rate for the Movement Network – Road Surface

Feature Class (Road Surface) Maintenance Activity Unit Maintenance Rate

Surface Peeling major m2 40,000.00
Asphalt Road
Surface Peeling minor m2 36,000.00
Lifting of Cobble Stone m2 625
Siltation m2 400
Cobble Stone Road
Wash away m2 450
6. Cobble Edge Failure m2 645
Channeling m2 316
Non-Compaction m2 200
Gravel Road Siltation m2 180
Washe away m2 316
Depression m2 250
Depression m2 250
Siltation m2 150
2
Earthen Pressed Non-Compaction m 180
Wash Away m2 200
2
Channeling m 215

Table 62: - Maintenance Rate for Different Deterioration Types – Walkway

Feature Class (Walkway
Maintenance Activity Unit Maintenance Rate
Surface)
Terrazzo/Clay Tile Surface Peeling m2 718

Table 63: - Maintenance rate for different deterioration types – Road Structures

Maintenance rate for Movement Network Assets for different deterioration types - Road structure

Feature Class (Road Surface) Maintenance Activity Unit Maintenance Rate

1. Slab Failure m2 10,000.00

2
3. Siltation m 800.00
Culvert
4. Crack m2 5,500.00
2
2. Abutment Failure m 2,600.00

72
 Table 64: Maintenance Rate for Environmental Strategic Activity Area
Maintenance rate for different deterioration types - Environmental Activity Area
Feature Class
Maintenance Activity Unit Maintenance Rate
(Drainage Material)
1. Minor Joint Damage m2 2,150.00
2
4. Floor Damage m 3,600.00
2. Closed Masonry 3
5. Cover Material Damage. m 5,600.00
Drain
3
6. Siltation and Deposition m 800.00
7. No Deterioration m2
1. Minor Joint Damage m2 2,150.00
3. Wall Collapse m2 2,400.00
5. Open Masonry Drain 4. Floor Damage m2 3,600.00
3
6. Siltation and Deposition m 650.00
2
7. No Deterioration m

Table 65: Maintenance Rate for Water Supply Network Asset

Maintenance rate for Below - Ground assets
Grade Description Indicative RUL Maintenance as % of CRC
1 Very good 71-100% 0.001%
2 Good 46-70% 0.02%
3 Moderate 26-45% 0.05%
4 Poor 11-25% 0.1%
5 Very Poor 0-10% 100%

Maintenance Rate for Above -Ground assets

S.no Feature Class Unit Maintenance Rate as % of RC
1 Borehole no 1.0%RC
2 Collection chamber no 0.5%RC
3 Reservoir no 0.5%RC
4 Booster Pump no 2.0%RC
5 Borehole Pump no 2.0%RC
6 Gate Valve no 2.0%RC
7 Public tap (Water point) no 1.0%RC
8 Hydrants no 2.0%RC
9 Spring no 1.0%RC

73
 Table 66: Maintenance Rate for Social and Economic Activity Areas and Supporting Services.
Feature Class Good Moderate Poor
Social & Economic Service Buildings and 0.5 % of RC 2 % of RC 3 % of RC
Facilities
Administrative Buildings 0.5 % of RC 2 % of RC 3 % of RC

Machineries 2 % of RC 2 % of RC 2 % of RC
Vehicles 10 % of RC 10 % of RC 10 of RC

6.4 Proportion of the Asset to be maintained

The proportion of the movement network and drainage channels to be maintained as per the revised
manual is the amount of the deteriorated area identified by condition assessments. Estimation of
normal maintenance need is therefore determined based on the deterioration area that is considering
percentage of the segment found in different maintenance activity is supposed to get the retaining
maintenance measure.

6.5 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Need of the Movement Network

Routine and periodic maintenance should carry out for movement network assets rated as good
performing. The target of normal maintenance measures is to preserve the existing good condition
of assets that is the desired asset condition level to ensure continues optimal use of the assets.
Cognizing that most of maintenance activities at this condition level are routine and periodic, the
following are the proposed maintenance measures for the movement network assets.

6.6 Routine and Periodic Maintenance Budget Forecast for Movement Network

The total amount of routine and periodic maintenance budget estimated for movement network is
Birr 1,906,152.50. The maintenance budget estimates of each movement network assets are
presented in the following pages.

6.6.1 Road Surfacing

The existing road surfacing, excluding earthen road needs an estimated Birr 3,280,179.05
for routine and periodic maintenance to retain their existing good condition.

74
Table 67: Routine and Periodic Maintenance Budget for the Road

Routine and Periodic Maintenance Budget for Movement Network

Quantity to Estimated
Level of Unit Rate
Feature Class Maintenance Activity Unit be Maintenance
deterioration (Br)
Maintained Budget (Br)
Surface Peeling
Asphalt Good m2 69.59 40,000.00 2,783,600.00
Major
Siltation Good m2 191.5 400 76,600.00
Cobble Edge
Cobble Sone Road Good m2 62.5 645 40,312.50
Failure
Lifting of Cobble
Good m2 68.03 625 42,518.75
Stone
Channeling Good m2 86.55 316 27,349.80
Non-Compaction Good m2 48 200 9,600.00
2
Gravel Road Siltation Good m 290 180 52,200.00
Depression Good m2 26 250 6,500.00
2
Wash away Good m 637.5 316 201,450.00
2
Earthen Pressed Wash Away Good m 200.24 200 40,048.00
1,679.91 3,280,179.05

Road Surface Rout andPeriodic Maintanance

Asphalt
4.14%
Earthen Pressed,
11.92%

Cobble Sone
Road, 19.17%,

Gravel Road,
64.77%

Figure 32: Routine and Periodic Maintenance Budget for the Road

75
 6.6.2 Pedestrian Walkway

Walkways that are found in state of good condition can be retained with similar maintenance
activities of the same road surfaces. Based on the condition assessment, the existing good
performing pedestrian sidewalk roads can be retained by an estimated Birr 31,951.00

Table 68 Routine and Periodic Maintenance Need of Pedestrian Walkways

width Quantity to Unit Routine

Maintenance Level of deteriorated
Feature Class Unit of the be Rate Maintenance
Activity deterioration length(m)
road(m) Maintained (Br) (Br)
Terrazzo/Clay
Lifting Of Bazola Good m2 6.501 3 44.5 718 31,951.00
Tile
Total 31,951.00

6.6.3 Culverts

The intention of routine and periodic maintenance of culverts is to maintain the structures in sound
condition and safe for traffic. Thus, culverts in good condition can be preserved by minor
maintenance activities such as clearing, cleaning, and erosion control measures. In order to function
properly, a culvert must retain the full opening over its complete length. In addition, the upstream
approaches and the downstream area must be free of any obstructions.

The overall objective of bridge maintenance is to keep the structures in sound condition and safe for
traffic. In this respect where a bridge spans a watercourse, the water must flow freely at all flood
levels without damaging the bridge or the waterway. In addition, repair of loose/missing connectors
and fixings and painting are the basic normal and minor maintenance measures to be carried out for
bridges rated as state of good conditions.

6.6.4 Street Light

Street lighting maintenance should be carried out using an approach whereby there are programs at
two levels: Preventative and Corrective and forced. Preventative maintenance of street lighting
comprises scheduled inspection and maintenance activity of road patrol, bulk lamp replacement and
pole inspection. The maintenance budget has been estimated by considering the replacement cost of
the bulb, the salary of at least two people, rental of cherry picker and rental of truck.

76
The City street light networks constituted by 183 street light poles have been inspected and 169
street lamps are found to be functional but it needs some maintenance. Taking the preventive
maintenance activities; road patrol, bulk lamp replacement and pole inspection of different types, it
is proposed that a minimum of Birr 122,694.00 will be needed to make them functional.

Table 69: Routine and Periodic Maintenance Need of Street Light

Total
Street Light Operation(functional)
Number of
Feature Class Street Light Type
Unit Street
unit(No) quantity Lights
rate
1. Compact Fluorescent Lamp
No 0 214.68 0
(CFL)
2. Florescent No 0 110.87 0
Street Light
3. High Pressure Sodium Lamp
No 169 726 122,694.00
(HPS)
4. Light Emitting Diode(LED) No 0 250.64 0
Total 169 122,694.00

6.7 Maintenance Deficit of the Movement Network Assets

The tables below summarize the proposed maintenance activities to be restored the deteriorated condition of
the movement network assets.

Table 70: Proposed Maintenance Activities for Deteriorated Asphalt Road

Deterioration Type Maintenance Measures and Methods
Cracking Cut out asphalt to 30cm on either side of the crack. Grade and compact the base. Cold
mix asphalt treatment, double or triple mix as required.
Surface peeling Cut out asphalt to a bounding rectangle in undamaged asphalt, with a minimum size of
1m*1m. Grade and compact the base. Cold mix asphalt treatment, double or triple mix
as required.
Potholes Cut out asphalt to a bounding rectangle in undamaged asphalt, with a minimum size of
2m*2m. Excavate base and sub-base material to sub-grade. Grade and compact the
new sub-base and base. Cold mix asphalt treatment, double or triple mix as required.
Larger areas of deterioration; It may require a hot-mix asphalt layer

Table 71: Proposed Maintenance Activities for Deteriorated Cobblestone Road

Deterioration type Maintenance measures and methods
Lifting of Lift out cobblestone in demarcated area. Clean the bed. Lay down a layer of clean,
cobblestones graded sand and compact. Lay new cobblestones

77
 Surface depression Lift out the cobblestone in demarcated area. Clean the bed. Add sub-base material
and compact. Lay sand bed and compact. Lay new cobblestones.
Failure of Lift out the cobblestone in demarcated area. Clean the bed. Add sub-base material
Cobblestone edging if required and compact. Lay sand bed and compact. Lay new cobblestones.

Table 72: Proposed Maintenance Activities for Deteriorated Red Ash Roads
Deterioration type Maintenance measures and methods
For channels, less than 20cm wide clean out channel, fill with graded material and
Channelling
compact by hand
Potholes Clean out depression, fill with graded material and compact by machine
For channels, greater than 30cm wide clean out channel, fill with graded material
Wash-away
and compact by machine

6.8 Budget Estimate to Eliminate Maintenance Deficit of the Movement Network Assets

Based on the proposed maintenance activities and rates provided for each condition level the
maintenance deficit of Movement Network assets, mainly including road surfacing, pedestrian
walkways, culverts and street light, in total is estimated Birr 20,290,032.35 The deficit of road
surfacing constitutes 98.33 % of the movement network and the forecasted budget of the strategic
activity area. The subsequent Tables present the estimated budget to address the deficit of each
movement network assets.

6.8.1 Maintenance Deficit of Road Surfacing.

The total maintenance backlog for all road surfaces is estimated to be about Birr 20,290,032.35 the detailed
analysis is attached in Microsoft Excel.

Table 73: Maintenance Deficit of Road Surfacing

Maintenance Deficit for Movement Network
Quantity Estimated
Level of Unit Rate
Feature Class Maintenance Activity Unit to be Maintenance
deterioration (Br)
Maintained Budget (Br)
Surface Peeling
1. Asphalt 3. Moderate m2 141.6 36,000.00 5,097,600.00
Minor
Lifting of Cobble
3. Moderate m2 464.406 625 290,253.75
Stone
2. Cobble Siltation 3. Moderate m2 2,528.82 400 1,011,529.20
Stone
2
Washed away 3. Moderate m 160 450 72,000.00
Cobble Edge Failure 3. Moderate m2 60 645 38,700.00
3. Gravel Channeling 3. Moderate m2 2,895.00 316 914,821.20

78
 No compaction 3. Moderate m2 2,580.34 200 516,068.00
Siltation 3. Moderate m2 1,701.39 180 306,250.20
Washed away 3. Moderate m2 4,011.40 316 1,267,603.92
Depression 3. Moderate m2 1,195.74 250 298,934.00
2
Depression 3. Moderate m 1,686.03 250 421,508.48
2
No compaction 3. Moderate m 84.80 180 15,264.00
2
4. Earth Siltation 3. Moderate m 565.41 150 84,811.50
Pressed Washed Away 3. Moderate m 2
1,457.04 200 291,408.35
Channeling 3. Moderate m2 610.3547 215 131,226.26
20,142.34 10,757,978.85
Maintenance Deficit for Movement Network
Quantity to Estimated
Level of Unit Rate
Feature Class Maintenance Activity Unit be Maintenance
deterioration (Br)
Maintained Budget (Br)
Lifting of Cobble
2. Cobble 4. Poor m2 96 625 60,000.00
Stone
Stone
Siltation 4. Poor m2 1,319.91 400 527,962.92
Channeling 4. Poor m2 2,488.39 316 786,331.24
2
Non-Compaction 4. Poor m 6,508.78 200 1,301,756.80
2
3. Gravel Siltation 4. Poor m 3,597.89 180 647,620.33
Wash Away 4. Poor m2 7,133.51 316 2,254,188.69
2
Depression 4. Poor m 3,120.97 250 780,242.50
Depression 4. Poor m2 1,517.31 250 379,326.25
2
Wash Away 4. Poor m 5,436.45 200 1,087,289.00
12.Earth
Channeling 4. Poor m2 764.43 215 164,352.67
Pressed
2
Non-Compaction 4. Poor m 7,068.80 180 1,272,383.10
2
Siltation 4. Poor m 1804 150 270,600.00
40,856.43 9,532,053.50
Total
Maintainance 60,998.77 20,290,032.35
Defficet

79
 MAINTANANCE DEFCIT OF ROAD SURFACE

12.Earth Pressed,
20.30% 1. Asphalt,
25.12%

2. Cobble Stone,
3. Gravel, 44.72% 9.86%,

Figure 33: Proportion of Maintenance Deficit of Road Surfacing

6.8.2 Maintenance Deficit Road Structures

Maintenance activities for deteriorated road structures should vary based on the types and materials
of the structures itself and deterioration and damages identified. Maintenance of deteriorated
bridges should vary based on the types and materials of the bridge and the extent and types of
defects and damages. Most commonly, the bridge maintenance comprises the following:

 Replacing wearing surface, crack seal surface, pave full width, seal joint between edge of
paving and face of wall,
 Pointing masonry, repair barriers, safety features, slab maintenance, replace walls, saw cut
around deterioration, patch with concrete,
 Patch delaminating replaces deck and floor beam/ column, etc.

The estimated maintenance backlog of bridges and culverts is then Birr 779,958.00 birr\

80
Table 74: Maintenance Deficits of Bridges and Culverts
Maintenance Deficit for Movement Network
Estimated
Level of Quantity to be Unit Rate
Feature Class Maintenance Activity Unit Maintenance
deterioration Maintained (Br)
Budget (Br)
3. Siltation 3. Moderate m2 27.74 800 22,192.00
Culvert
4. Crack 3. Moderate m2 10 5,500.00 55,000.00
Sub total 37.74 77,192.00
2
1. Slab Failure 4. Poor m 27.2 10,000.00 272,000.00
Abutment Failur 4. Poor m2 6.8 2,600.00 17,680.00
Culvert
3. Siltation 4. Poor m2 70.17 800 56,136.00
2
4. Crack 4. Poor m 64.9 5,500.00 356,950.00
Sub total 169.07 702,766.00
TOTAL 206.81 779,958.00

6.8.3 Maintenance Summary of Movement Network

Table 75: Maintenance summary of Movement Network

Routine and
Strategic Activity Total
Periodic Maintenance
S.no Area and Feature Maintenance
Maintenance Deficit (Birr)
Class Need (Birr)
(Birr)
I. The Movement Network Assets
1 Road Network 3,280,179.05 20,290,032.00 23,570,211.05
2 Footpath 31,951.00 0 31,951.00
3 Road Structures 0 779,958.00 779,958.00
4 Others (Street Light) 122,694.00 0 122,694.00
Total 3,434,824.05 21,069,990.00 24,504,814.05

6.9 Rehabilitation of the Movement Network Assets

6.9.1 Rehabilitation of Road Surfacing

Again, the major share of rehabilitation is found in 3.29 Km of equivalent length of road is in need of
urgent rehabilitation work. In general, including all road-surfacing materials it is proposed that about Birr
4,109,973.98 would be allocated to rehabilitate as high as 16,839.28 square meters of severely deteriorated
roads.

81
Table 76: Rehabilitation Requirement of Movement Network Assets-Road

Rehabilitation of Movement Network

Quantity to
Estimated
Maintenance Level of be Unit Rate
Feature Class Unit Maintenance
Activity deterioration Maintained (Br)
Budget (Br)
In Km
5. Channeling 5. Very Poor Km 0.487069 519,400.00 252,983.64
13. Non
5. Very Poor Km 0.63607 519,400.00 330,374.76
Compaction
12. Earth Pressed
8. Depression 5. Very Poor km 0.423221 519,400.00 219,820.99
12. Siltation 5. Very Poor km 0.0257 519,400.00 13,348.58
9. Wash Away 5. Very Poor km 0.310405 519,400.00 161,224.36
9. Wash Away 5. Very Poor km 0.035081 8,309,435.53 291,503.31
2.Cobble stone Road 7. Lifting of
5. Very Poor km 0.01 8,309,435.53 46,366.65
Cobble Stone
8. Depression 5. Very Poor km 0.204005 2,043,579.44 416,900.42
9. Wash Away 5. Very Poor km 0.624543 2,043,579.44 1,276,303.23
3. Gravel Road 5. Channeling 5. Very Poor km 0.036813 2,043,579.44 75,230.29
13. Non
5. Very Poor km 0.50202 2,043,579.44 1,025,917.75
Compaction
TOTAL 3.290507 4,109,973.98

6.9.2 Rehabilitation of Road Structures

Road structures are the main important structures in dealing with transport system and drainage
facilitation. Hence, these structures should be maintained and preserved in good condition. Those
bridges and culverts, which are deteriorated severely, are identified and needs an estimated
rehabilitation or replacement cost of Birr 1,320,000.00

Table 77: Rehabilitation Requirement of Movement Network Assets-Road Structures

Quantity to
Level of Unit Rate
Feature Class Maintenance Activity Unit be Maintenance
deterioration (Br)
Maintained Budget (Br)
Slab Failure Very Poor No 6 156,000.00 936,000
Siltation Very Poor No 2 156,000.00 312,000
Culvert
Crack Very Poor No 1 156,000.00 156,000
Abutment Failure Very Poor No 1 156,000.00 156,000
TOTAL 10 1,560,000.00

82
6.10 Maintaining Water Supply Network

6.10.1 General

Cognizing that water supply network assets are often under frequent surveillances and repair and
maintenance activities, the maintenance forecast made in this AMP is to estimate the annual budget
needed to ensure proper budget allocation. The maintenance forecast for above ground water assets
is computed based on the fixed percentage of replacement cost without any condition indicator as
guided in the AMP manual. For belowground water supply network assets, the condition level and
maintenance rate is estimated based on the indicative remaining useful life of the pipelines.

6.10.2 Maintenance Forecast for Above Ground Water Supply Network Assets

As provided in the tables below, the city will allocate a minimum of Birr 238,700.for above ground
assets and Birr 3,655.18 for below ground assets and in total about Birr 278,097.99 would be
needed to keep the water supply network functional and operating without risk of significant supply
cut-off.

6.10.3 Maintenance Forecast for Below Ground Water Supply Network Assets

Table 78 Maintenance Requirements for above Ground Water Network Assets

Maintenance Rate Routine and Periodic

S.no Feature Class Unit Qty
as % of RC Maintenance (Br)

1 Water Wall (50m < Depth <100m) no 4 1.00% 4,000.00

1.1 Booster Pump Diam 100 no 2 2.00% 30,160.00
1.2 Booster Pump Diam 200 no 1 2.00% 17,680.00
2.1 Reservoir (1000m3) no 1 0.50% 51,000.00
2.2 Reservoir (360 m3) no 1 0.50% 33,150
2.3 Reservoir (100m3) no 3 0.50% 75,030
3 Public tap (Water point) no 9 2.00% 72,000.00
Total 283,020.00

Wereta city has around 32.009 Km of below ground water supply network asset, out of which 53% of the
total length is built within the last nine years so the asset has relatively shorter service age. Supposing that
they would need regular maintenance and repair activities for breakage and damage based on frequent
inspection and leakage detection maintenance budget is forecasted based on the relationship between the

83
RUL and the condition. As a result, a total of Birr 3,655.18 is forecasted for distribution and transmission
lines and bono laterals to repair any possible risk of breakage and damages as the revised manual
recommends it.

Table 79: Forecasted Maintenance Budget for Below Ground Water Lines

Level of
Routine and Periodic
Feature Class deteriorati Unit Quantity
Maintenance t (Br)
on

Distribution
Moderate Km 11.517407 3,445.54
Network
Very Good Km 8.692473 53.910683
20.20988 3,499.45
Transmission
Very Good Km 10.93 145.289835
Network
Moderate Km 0.869915 10.438983
Sub Total 11.799915 155.73
Total 32.009795 3,655.18

6.11 Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Assets in Environmental Activity Area

6.11.1 Routine and Periodic Maintenance Activities for Drainage Networks

All drain lines or drainpipes should be maintained in good working edict without defects. All such
lines or pipes should be inspected regularly and where leakage, blockage or defects are detected,
they should be rectified immediately.

Blockage of drains by solid dusts or items, commonly siltation, can be cleared by high-pressure
water jet or Roding, which is easily applicable and implemented. For these manholes should be
readily accessible for regular maintenance. Access to them should not be obstructed. And or the
best alternative option of clearing and cleaning of drain systems especially for open drainage
systems is using human power. So that, desalting drains and sewers is one of the best ways to
ensure drainage system to fully operational and greatly reduces the risk of flooding from wet
weather.

The main routine and periodic maintenance activities as described above to preserve good
performing drainage networks needs an estimated budget of Birr 289,391.30

84
Table 80: Routine and Periodic Maintenance Budget Estimate for Drainage Network

Routine and
Quantity to Unit
Level of Periodic
Feature Class Maintenance Activity Unit be Rate
deterioration Maintenance
Maintained (Br)
(Br)
Minor Joint Damage Good m3 15.5 2,150.00 33,325.00
Open Major Joint Damage Good m3 6 2,300.00 13,800.00
Masonry
Drainage Floor Damage Good m3 52 3,600.00 187,200.00
Siltation and Deposition Good m3 34.502 650 22,426.30
Closed Siltation and Deposition Good m 3
4.25 800 3,400.00
Masonry 2
Drainage 1. Minor Joint Damage Good m 13.6 2150 29,240.00

Total 125.852 289,391.30

6.11.2 Routine and Periodic Maintenance Activities for Sanitation

Table 81: Routine and Periodic Maintenance Budget Estimate for Toilets

Feature Number of Total Unit Rate as Routine and Periodic

Condition Unit
Class Buildings Area % of RC Maintenance (Br)
Public
Good 1 m2 9 0.50% 1,728
Toilet
Total 1 9 1,728

6.11.3 Maintenance Deficits of Drainage Networks

Some of the drainage line found to be in deteriorated condition and need significant maintenance
and it would be among the top maintenance priority to minimize the spillover negative effects of the
poorly functioning drainage line. The following are some of the proposed maintenance activities
recommended for deteriorated drainage networks.

 Clean out the damaged area and refill the affected joints with new mortar.
 Remove all damaged block back to the solid wall. Clean the joints and lay new blocks.
 Replace manhole cover or grating, pointing joints, Maintaining weep holes
 Maintain headwall, replacing stone, provide new meter (turnout) drain, reline drain,
reshaping, are the main maintenance activities.

85
To address the accumulated maintenance deficit of the drainage, network the study proposes an
estimated about of Birr 3,316,724.11

Table 82: Maintenance Deficit for Drainage Network

Maintenance Deficit for Drainage Channels
Quantity to Unit Estimated
Level of
Feature Class Maintenance Activity Unit be Rate Maintenance
deterioration
Maintained (Br) Budget (Br)

1. Closed 5. Cover Material

3. Moderate m2 20 5,600.00 112,000.00
Masonry Damage
Drain 6. Siltation and Deposition 3. Moderate m3 265.736 800 212,588.80
2
1. Minor Joint Damage 3. Moderate m 128.335353 2,150.00 275,921.01
2.Open 2. Major Joint Damage 3. Moderate m 2
68.06 2,300.00 156,538.00
Masonry 2
Drain 4. Floor Damage 3. Moderate m 124.294 3,600.00 447,458.40
3
6. Siltation and Deposition 3. Moderate m 952.232 650 618,950.80
Total 1,558.66 1,823,457.01

Maintenance Deficit for Drainage Channels

Quantity to Unit Estimated
Level of
Feature Class Maintenance Activity Unit be Rate Maintenance
deterioration
Maintained (Br) Budget (Br)
6. Siltation and Deposition 4. Poor m3 286.612 800 229,289.60
2
2. Minor Joint Damage 4. Poor m 32 2150 68,800.00
1.Closed
Masonry 4. Floor Damage 4. Poor m2 12 3600 43,200.00
5. Cover Material
4. Poor m3 34.5 5600 193,200.00
Damage
2. Minor Joint Damage 4. Poor m2 25 2,150.00 53,750.00
3
2.Open 6. Siltation and Deposition 4. Poor m 672.35 650 437,027.50
Masonry 3. Wall Collapse 4. Poor m 3
165 2,400.00 396,000.00
4. Floor Damage 4. Poor m2 20 3,600.00 72,000.00
Total 1247.462 1,493,267.10

6.11.4 Maintenance Deficits of Sanitation

Among the total 17 public toilets existing in the city, the inspection reported that 11 public and
communal toilets are found in state of moderate and poor condition. The study thus proposes Birr
559,608.00 to preserve them in good performing condition.

86
Table 83: Maintenance Deficit for sanitation

Number of Total Unit Rate as Maintenance

Feature Class Condition Unit
Buildings Area % of RC Deficit (Br)

Communal Toilet Moderate 4 m2 41 2.00% 86,928.00

2
Sub Total 4 m 41 86,928.00
2
Communal Toilet Poor 3 m 36 3.00% 191,160.00
2
Public Toilet Poor 8 m 92 3.00% 281,520.00
Sub Total 11 128 472,680.00
Total(Moderate+ Poor) 559,608.00

6.11.5 Maintenance Deficits of Solid Waste System & Sanitations

The solid facilities of the city consists 14 dust bines containers distributed throughout the city. The
waste disposal dumpsite is temporary since it needs fence. It needs an estimated amount of 4,682.00
birr.

Table 84: Maintenance Deficit for Temporary Solid waste Site

Total Unit Rate as % of Maintenance Deficit

Feature Class Condition Unit
Area RC (Br)
Hand craft Poor No Poor Poor
#8 0 8
Maintenance Cost 0 3% 432.00
Dust Bin Moderate No Moderate Moderate
#8 8 2% 2,000.00
Dust Bin Poor No Poor Poor
#6 6 3% 2,250.00
TOTAL 4,682.00

6.11.6 Maintenance Deficits of, Greenery, and Street-Side Greenery

In aggregate, the city consists of 4.53 hectare of greeneries, which covers an area of 0.0357-hectare
coverage seedling site. In addition, 1.221 -hectare street side green, 1.865-hectare community green
and 0.66 hectare for recreational areas are owned by the city. The assessment indicates that in state
of moderate condition needed an estimated Birr 1,490,373.40 maintain and restore the deteriorated
condition.

87
Table 85: Maintenance Deficit for Greenery and street side greenery
Total Unit Rate as % of Maintenance Deficit
Feature Class Condition Unit
Area RC (Br)
Community Greeneries Poor m2 18,659.67 0.50% 117,555.90
Recreational areas
Moderate m2 6,639.50 2.00% 21,910.00
Greenery
Play Field Poor m2 19,084.85 3.00% 1,316,854.66
Street side Greenery Moderate m2 5,351.24 2.00% 9,204.14
Street side Greenery Poor m2 6,859.32 3.00% 17,697.04
Seedling Site Moderate m2. 357.58 2.00% 7,151.66
Total 56,952.16 1,490,373.40

Table 86: Rehabilitation of Drainage Network

Quantity to
Level of Unit Rate Maintenance
Maintenance Activity Unit be
deterioration (Br) cost (Br)
Maintained
1. Minor Joint
Very Poor Km 0.018727 3,384,000.00 63,372.17
Open Damage
Masonry 4. Floor Damage Very Poor Km 0.01315 3,384,000.00 44,499.60
Drain 6. Siltation and
Very Poor Km 0.066781 3,384,000.00 225,986.90
Deposition
Subtotal Very poor 333,858.67

Table 87: Rehabilitation of Temporary Solid waste Site

Quantity to Unit
Uni Maintenance
Maintenance Activity Level of deterioration be Rate
t cost (Br)
Maintained (Br)
Open Space Solid Waste Dump
Very Poor m2.
Site (Temporary) 59,156.31 130 7,690,320.21

6.12 Maintenance of Assets in Social and Economic Activity Area

6.12.1 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Social and Economic Service Buildings

Buildings rated as good condition will be prevented by routine and periodic maintenance actions.
Since most of the service buildings are found in good conditions the municipality should allocate
adequate budget for preventive maintenance to extend the useful life of the buildings and declining
the future big maintenance cost.

88
 6.12.2 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Health Service Buildings

About 13 health buildings covering 1,376.81 square meters have been inspected and found to be in
good condition. The health service buildings comprise offices, waiting rooms, exam and ward
rooms and toilet services. Then it is proposed birr 103,437.28 to keep their current good condition.

Table 88: Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Health Service Buildings

Number of Total Routine and Periodic

Feature Class Condition Unit
Buildings Area Maintenance (Br)
Wereta Health Center Good 7 m2 1,376.81 103,437.28
Total 7 1,376.81 103,437.28

6.12.3 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of School Buildings

About 11 school buildings rated as good performing and functioning as class rooms, offices, libraries,
workshops, cafeterias, halls, laboratories, guard houses and toilet room will be prevented by routine
and periodic maintenance. The annual estimated maintenance budget to preventive maintenance of
these school buildings is Birr 254,958.68

Table 89: Preventive Maintenance Need of School Buildings

Number of Total Routine and Periodic

Feature class Condition Unit
Buildings Area(m2) Maintenance (Br)

Esteber Kindergarten Good 1 m2 218.45 17,066.49

Woreta primary school Good 2 m2 517.44 40,424.75
Dudmegn Primary School Good 2 m2 701.93 54,838.34
Woreta secondary and
Good 2 m2 42,395.77
preparatory school 542.67
Woreta TVET College Good 4 m2 1282.99 100,233.33
Total 11 m2 3,263.47 254,958.68

6.12.4 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Administrative Buildings

About 12 buildings rated as good performing and functioning as offices, libraries, workshops,
cafeterias, halls, laboratories, guard houses and toilet room will be prevented by routine and periodic

89
maintenance. The annual estimated maintenance budgets to preventive maintenance of this
Administrations Buildings Are Birr 120,083.92

Table 90: Preventive Maintenance of Administration Facilities

Total Routine
Feature Class Condition No Unit
Area Maintenance (Br)
Woreta City Administration Good 2 m2 422.70 12,892.29
Woreta Justice Bureau Good 2 m2 109.79 3,348.71
2
Woreta Water Supply Office Good 4 m 732.79 57,248.91
2
Small Scale enterprise Good 1 m 182.80 14,280.91
2
Woreta revenue office Good 1 m 41.62 1,269.33
2
Biaden beurruo Good 1 m 192.92 15,072.02
Woreta Construction and Housing
Good 1 m2 204.44 15,971.74
Development Office
Total 12 1,887.05 120,083.92

6.12.5 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Youth center Buildings

The annual estimated maintenance budget to preventive maintenance of these Youth Center
Buildings is Birr 22,205.13.

Table 91: Preventive Maintenance of youth center buildings

Routine
Number of
Feature Class Condition Unit Total Area Maintenance
Buildings
(Br)
Woreta Youth Center Good 1 m2 284.23 22,205.13
Total 1 284.23 22,205.13

6.12.6 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of MSE Buildings

The annual estimated maintenance budget to preventive maintenance of these MSE facility
Buildings is Birr 58,704.32

Table 92: Preventive Maintenance of MSE Buildings

Routine
Number of
Feature Class Unit Total Area Maintenance
Condition Buildings
(Br)
MSE shade for urban
Good 2 m2 584.07 36,504.17
agriculture
Container shop MSE Good 3 m2 510.35 22,200.15

90
 Total 5 1,094.41 58,704.32

6.12.7 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Housing Buildings

The annual estimated maintenance budget to preventive maintenance of these Housing Buildings is
Birr 9,961.33

Table 93: Preventive Maintenance of Housing buildings

Number of Total Routine and Periodic

Feature Class Condition Unit
Buildings Area Maintenance (Br)

Housing buildings Good 8 m2 326.6011 9,961.33

Total 8 326.6011 9,961.33

6.12.8 Routine and Periodic Maintenance of Other Municipal Facility

The annual estimated maintenance budget to preventive maintenance of these Other Municipal
Facility is Birr 19,680.00

Table 94: Preventive Maintenance of Other Municipal Facility

Routine and
Number of Total
Feature Class Condition Periodic
Buildings Unit Length
Maintenance (Br)
Municipal Facility Office Good 2 m2 64 19,680.00
Total 2 64 19,680.00

6.12.9 Maintenance Deficit of Health Buildings

The annual estimated maintenance budget to maintenance deficit of these Health Buildings is Birr
152,193.71

Table 95: Maintenance Deficit of Health Buildings

Feature Class
Number of Total Maintenance Deficit
Condition Buildings Unit Area (Br)
Wereta Health
Moderate 4 m2 503.78 135,081.28
Center
Poor 2 m2 93.51 17,112.43
Total 6 597.29 152,193.71

91
6.12.10Maintenance Deficit of Education school Buildings

About 51 school buildings rated as Moderate and poor performing and functioning as class rooms,
offices, libraries, workshops, cafeterias, halls, laboratories, guard houses and toilet room will be
prevented by routine and periodic maintenance. The annual estimated maintenance budget to
preventive maintenance of these school buildings is Birr 3,340,389.98

Table 96: Maintenance Deficit of Education School Buildings

Number of Maintenance
Feature Class Condition Unit Total Area(m2)
Buildings Deficit (Br)
Estaiber Kindergarten Moderate 2 m2 372.83 74,302.56
Menehar(03) Kindergarten Moderate 1 m2 29.79 3,634.74
Woreta primary school Moderate 8 m2 1,875.52 372,356.85
Dudmegn Primary School Moderate 6 m2 1,391.91 235,705.85
Woreta secondary and
Moderate 6 m2 1,475.99 421,340.14
preparatory school
Woreta TVET College Moderate 10 m2 3,760.98 1,175,306.35
Sub Total 33 8,907.03 2,282,646.49
Woreta primary school Poor 3 m2 588.74 107,739.50
Dudmegn Primary School Poor 5 m2 1004.27 369,536.39
Woreta TVET College Poor 3 m2 306.77 114,634.90
Woreta secondary and
Poor 7 m2 1,886.63 465,832.70
preparatory school
Sub Total 18 3,786.41 1,057,743.49
Total (Moderate +Poor) 12,693.44 3,340,389.98

6.12.11 Maintenance Deficit of Administrative Buildings

A total of 20 administration office buildings, as mentioned below composed of different sectorial

offices covering an area of 3,217.13 square meters are found in moderate and poor condition. The
study proposes an estimated Birr 475,356.56 to restore their deteriorated status. The detail of the
maintenance need by asset classes of the activity area is presented in the excel data set.

Table 97: Maintenance deficit of Administration Buildings

Total Maintenance
Feature Class Condition Unit
No Area Deficit (Br)

Administration Office Moderate 1 m2 179.72 21,925.24

92
Kebele 01 Office & meeting hall Moderate 2 m2 410.51 50,082.19
Kebele 02 Office Moderate 1 m2 26.30 3,208.14
Kebele 03 Office Moderate 1 m2 44.64 5,446.07
Kebele 04 Office Moderate 1 m2 97.18 11,855.67
Woreta police station office Moderate 1 m2 32.54 3,969.32
Justice Office Moderate 2 m2 1230.86 150,164.72
Woreta Revenue, agriculture, women
Moderate 1 m2 412.58 50,334.80
and children
Woreta Construction and Housing
Moderate 1 m2 112.81 35,254.06
development Office
adisalem water office 1 Moderate 1 m2 158.34 49,482.44
Total 12 2,705.47 381,722.65
2
Administration Finance office Poor 2 m 85.75 15,693.15
Justice Document checking and
Poor 1 m2 73.45 13,442.17
representing Office
Kebele 02 Office Poor 1 m2 105.15 19,241.54
Kebele 03 meeting hall Poor 1 m2 41.04 7,509.51
Kebele 04 meeting hall Poor 1 m2 42.13 7,710.64
2
Woreta police station Poor 2 m 164.14 30,036.91
Total 8 511.66 93,633.92
Total (Moderate +Poor) 20 3,217.13 475,356.56

6.12.12 Maintenance Deficit of Youth center Buildings

The Maintenance Deficit of these Youth Center Buildings is Birr 51,548.06

Table 98: Maintenance deficit of Youth Centre Buildings

Number of Maintenance
Feature Class Condition Unit Total Area
Buildings Deficit (Br)
Youth center Moderate 1 m2 198.46 24,212.53
Poor 2 m2 149.37 27,335.53
Total 3 347.84 51,548.06

93
6.12.13 Maintenance Deficit of MSE Buildings

The Maintenance Deficit of these MSE facility Buildings is Birr 598,936.18

Table 99: Maintenance deficit of MSE Buildings

Number of Maintenance
Feature Class Condition Unit Total Area
Buildings Deficit (Br)
MSE Building Moderate 5 m2 1,642.53 285,800.92
Poor 3 m2 291.29 76,025.71
Container shop MSE Moderate 2 m2 948.44 237,109.55
Total 10 2,882.26 598,936.18

6.12.14 Maintenance Deficit of Other municipal facility

The annual estimated maintenance budget to maintenance deficit of these other municipal is Birr
12,583.533

Table 100: Maintenance deficit of other municipal facility

Feature Class Condition No Unit Total Area Maintenance Deficit (Br)

Woreta Bus Station Office Poor 1 m2 68.76 12,583.533

6.12.15 Maintenance Deficit of Abiator facility

The annual estimated maintenance budget to maintenance deficit of these other municipal is Birr
33,183.10

Table 101: Maintenance deficit of Aviator facility

Maintenance
Feature Class Condition No Unit Total Area
Deficit (Br)
Abattoir Facility Moderate 2 m2 123.18 21,433.76
2
Poor 2 m 45.02 11,749.34
Total 4 168.20 33,183.10

94
6.12.16 Maintenance Deficit of Housing Facility

The annual estimated maintenance budget to maintenance deficit of these Housing Facility is Birr
662,918.20

Table 102: Maintenance deficit of Housing Facility

Maintenance
Feature Class Condition No Unit Total Area
Deficit (Br)
Housing Facility Moderate 52 m2 2,670.04 325,744.81
Poor 41 m2 1,842.48 337,173.39
Total 93 4,512.52 662,918.20

6.12.17 Maintaining and Repairing Machineries and Vehicles

Machineries and vehicles found in good condition will need frequent services whereas these rated
as moderate and poor condition level would get major maintenance and replacement of parts. In
addition, it is supposed that machineries and vehicles rated under sever condition apparently
requires replacing damaged parts and components if not decommissioned. As mentioned in
maintenance unit rate section, the estimation of maintenance and repair cost of machineries and
vehicles is computed based on the fixed rate as percentage of the replacement cost. It is worth
mentioning here that the forecasted maintenance would only serve as indicative annual maintenance
budget need. The condition assessment is done based on the percentage of estimated useful life,
accordingly those vehicles and machineries which are found in good condition can be repaired with
an estimated routine and periodic maintenance budget of Birr 622,200.00 for annual bases.

Table 103: Maintaining and Repairing Machineries and Vehicles

Machinery Current
Name of Machineries
Vehicle Number Condition Replacement MR MC
and Vehicles
Type Cost (ETB)
Motor Cycle Yamaha Cruk Motor Cycle 6 Good 97,600.00 10% 9,760.00
Toyota_picup Pick up 4 Good 1,586,000.00 10% 158,600.00
covera Pick up 1 Good 1,952,000.00 10% 195,200.00
Dump truk Dump truck 1 Good 2,440,000.00 10% 244,000.00
Tagrawu Bajaj Pick up 1 Good 146,400.00 10% 14,640.00
Total 13 6,222,000.00 622,200.00

95
6.13 Maintenance Summary

Maintenance need have identified for all the city assets with the aim to retain the good performing
assets and restore deteriorated assets to the level of the desired condition level. Correspondingly the
maintenance expenditure is forecasted. Accordingly, this section summarizes the maintenance need.
Consequently, the study proposes Birr 5,223,848.74 for routine and periodic maintenance while the
budget estimate to address the maintenance deficit is 32,349,392.04The forecasted maintenance
totaled to Birr 37,573,240.78

Table 104: Maintenance Summary for All Asset Categories

Routine and
Strategic Activity Total
Periodic Maintenance
S.no Area and Feature Maintenance
Maintenance Deficit (Birr)
Class Need (Birr)
(Birr)
I. The Movement
Network Assets
1 Road
1.1 Asphalt Road 2,783,600.00 5,097,600.00 7,881,200.00
1.2 Cobble Stone Road 159,431.25 2,000,445.87 2,159,877.12
1.3 Gravel Road 297,099.80 9,073,816.87 9,370,916.67
Earth Pressed
1.4 40,048.00 4,118,169.60 4,158,217.60
Road
Total Road
3,280,179.05 20,290,032.34 23,570,211.39
Network
2 Footpath 0
2.1 Terrazzo/Clay Tile 31,951.00 0 31,951.00
Total foot path 31,951.00 0 31,951.00
3 Road Structures 0
3.1 Culvert 0 779,958.00 779,958.00
Total culvert 0 779,958.00 779,958.00
4 Street Light 122,694.00 0 122,694.00
Total Street Light 122,694.00 122,694.00
The Movement
3,434,824.05 21,069,990.34 24,504,814.39
Network total
II. Water Supply
Network Assets
Above-Ground
2.1
Assets
2.1.1 Water Wall 4,000 0 4,000

96
 Routine and
Strategic Activity Total
Periodic Maintenance
S.no Area and Feature Maintenance
Maintenance Deficit (Birr)
Class Need (Birr)
(Birr)
2.1.2 Booster Pump 47,840 0 47,840
2.1.3 Reservoirs 159,180 0 159,180
2.1.4 Public Tap 72,000 0 72,000
Sub Total 283,020.00 0 283,020.00
Below-Ground
2.2
Assets
2.2.1 Transmission Line 155.73 155.73
2.2.2 Distribution Line 3,499.00 3,499.00
Sub Total 3,654.73 3,654.73
Water Supply
286,674.73 0 286,674.73
Total
III. Environmental
Strategic Area
3.1 Drainage 289,391.30 3,316,724.00 3,606,115.30
3.2 Greenery 0 2,071,278.36 2,071,278.36
solid wast hand
3.3 0 4,682.00 4,682.00
cart and dust bin
3.4 Toilet Sanitation 1,728 559,608.00 561,336.00
Environmental
Strategic Area 291,119.30 5,952,292.36 6,243,411.66
Total
IV. Social and
Economic Strategic
Area
4.1 Education Bldgs. 254,958.68 3,340,389.98 3,595,348.66
4.2 Health Bldgs. 103,437.28 152,193.71 255,630.99
4.3 Youth Bldgs. 22,205.13 51,548.06 73,753.19
4.4 Other Bldgs. 19,680.00 12,583.55 32,263.55
4.5 MSE Bldgs. 58,704.32 598,936.18 657,640.50
4.6 Abiytor Building 0 33,183.10 33,183.10
4.7 Housing Bldgs. 9,961.33 662,918.20 672,879.53
Social and Economic Strategic Area
468,946.74 4,851,752.78 5,320,699.52
Total
V. Supporting
Services
5.1 Admin Buildings 120,083.92 475,356.56 595,440.48
Machineries and
5.2 622,200.00 0.00 622,200.00
Vehicles

97
 Routine and
Strategic Activity Total
Periodic Maintenance
S.no Area and Feature Maintenance
Maintenance Deficit (Birr)
Class Need (Birr)
(Birr)
Supporting
742,283.92 475,356.56 1,217,640.48
Services Total
Total Maintenance
Cost
5,223,848.74 32,349,392.04 37,573,240.78

Buget For Maintainace Defficet By Strategic

Activity Area
70.00%

60.00%

50.00%
percentage

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
Social and
Movement Water Supply Environmental
Economic Supporting
Network Assets Network Assets Strategic Area
Strategic Area Services Total
Total Total Total
Total
Series1 65.22% 0.76% 16.62% 14.16% 3.24%

Figure 34: Budgets for maintenance deficit by strategic area

6.14 Rehabilitation Summary

As discussed, and presented in former sections assets that need rehabilitation are identified from the
condition assessments. In parallel the financial requirement for rehabilitation is forecasted. The total
forecasted funding needs to restore and replace severely deteriorated assets is estimated about Birr
13,694,152.86.

98
 Table 105: Rehabilitation Summary
Rehabilitation/
Strategic Activity Area Replacement Forecast
(Birr)
I. The Movement Network Assets
Road
Coble stone Road 337,869.96
Gravel Road 2,794,351.70
Earthen Pressed Road 977,752.32
Sub Total 4,109,973.98
Road Structures
Culvert 1,560,000.00
Sub Total 1,560,000.00
Movement Network Total 5,669,973.98
III. Environmental Strategic Area
Drainage 333,858.67
Open Space Solid Waste Dump Site 7,690,320.21
(Temporary)
Environmental Strategic Area
8,024,178.88
Total
Total Rehabilitation Cost 13,694,152.86

Rehablitation Or Replacement Cost

Movement Network
41.40%, Total
Environmental
58.60%,
Strategic Area Total

Figure 35: rehabilitation or replacement forecast

99
7. Step 6: COSTING, VALUING, THE EXISTING ASSET BASE & ITS DEFICIT

7.1 Introduction

Asset cost and value are important for the successful implementation of Asset Management Plan
and decision making. Knowledge of how well an asset retains its value can be as important
knowledge of capital investments cost. Poorly planned AMP means poor management of the assets,
which leads to substantial reduction of the effective working life of the assets. Whenever a city is
unable to maintain its existing assets, it will be difficult for the same city to get investment and /or
additional support for further development. In other words, if the credit worthiness of the city is
rated as low, then it does not attract investors of any kind. Hence knowledge of both assets cost and
asset value are important for the successful functioning of an Asset Management Plan.

There are many ways and techniques to value the municipal assets. As per the AMP manual and
international practices the valuation of infrastructure assets employed in this study is based on the
calculation of the current replacement cost (CRC) and Depreciated Replacement Cost (DRC).

7.2 Building List of Rates for New Assets Provision

In order to determine CRC and then DRC and current value of existing assets, establishments of
unit rate for new assets is the basic and the primary task which is however often challenging. To
estimate unit price of acquisition and construction of new assets therefore different source of
information are assessed, reviewed and customized. In doing so efforts have been made to make the
cost information tends to be current and pertinent to local labor and material and adjustment made
for inflation factors when necessary. The followings are sources and procedure employed to
determine the unit cost and price of new assets.

i. The current Unit rates set by the Wereta Municipality for the preparation of the CIP
particularly for major movement assets is directly adopted,
ii. Historical cost data of construction and acquisition of municipal assets are gathered from
the city and other cities,
iii. The actual construction and acquisition cost of some assets are adopted from recent
projects and procurements of other cities

iv. The recent biddings and actual construction cost of road projects of ARCE are

100
 reviewed,
v. Bill of quantities and cost estimation for major components of buildings collected from
the peer cities are reviewed.
vi. AMP and CIP documents of other cities are thoroughly reviewed and compared to
Wereta,
Based on these sources the unit rate for acquisition and construction of each asset is estimated.
Accordingly, in tables below presents the unit rate estimated for new assets.

Valuation plays an important role in enabling reporting of the physical condition of the city assets
in monetary terms. The valuation of the city assets is based on the calculation of DRC (Depreciated
Replacement Cost). This is due to that apart from the challenges to obtain historical cost date or
lack of reliable information of original cost of construction and acquisition, DRC enable to consider
the price increase over the years. Furthermore, applying depreciated replacement cost (DRC) to
estimate current value of the city assets is a common international practice and recommended by the
revised AMP manual.

DRC is based on current replacement cost of assets less an allowance for deterioration of condition
to date, and based on the fraction of remaining useful life over expected useful life. So DRC is thus
simply computed as the ratio of the remaining useful life to the expected useful life as a percentage
of current replacement cost.

According to the AMP manual, due to accelerated depreciation nature of movement network and
drainage channel, the maintenance deficit must be deducted from DRC to obtain an estimated
current value of the asset. For the rest of the asset, it is supposed to be that they are not subjected to
accelerated depreciation the DRC itself is supposed to be representing the estimated current value
of the asset.

Current Value (CV) of Infrastructure Assets can be estimated as: -

CV= DRC =RV

Where DRC = (RUL/ EUL) x CRC-MD

Current Value of Facilities and Municipal Service Assets can be estimated as: -

101
 CV = DRC=RV, AD=CRC-CV

Where DRC = (RUL/ EUL) x CRC

Were,

 CV is the Current Value

 CRC is the current replacement cost
 DRC is Depreciated Replacement Cost of the Asset
 RUL is the remaining useful life
 EUL is the expected useful life
 MD is the maintenance deficit of the assets
 AD is the asset deficit
 RV is Residual Value of the asset

Table 106: Unit Rate for the Movement Network Assets

S.no Feature Class Unit Unit Rate (Br)
1 Asphalt Road Km 41,250,000.00
2 Cobblestone road Km 8,309,435.53
3 Gravel road Km 2,043,579.44
4 Earth Pressed Road Km 519,400.00
5 Terrazzo/Clay Tile Km 3,803,000.00
6 Culverts No 156,000.00
Feature Class (Street Light) Unit Rate per One Pole
Street Lamp Unit Wood
Florescent No. 12,000.00
High Pressure Sodium Lamp
No. 26,500
(HPS)

Table 107: Unit Rate for Water Supply Network Assets

S.no Feature Class Unit Unit Rate
Water Wall (50m < Depth
1 no 1,000,000.00
<100m)
1.1 Booster Pump Diam 100 no 754,000.00
1.2 Booster Pump Diam 200 no 884,000.00
2.1 Reservoir (1000m3) no 10,200,000.00

102
 2.2 Reservoir (360 m3) no 6,630,000.00
2.3 Reservoir (100m3) no 5,002,000.00
3 Public tap (Water point) no 400,000.00

No. Water supply sub-category Unit Unit Rate

1 Transmission Network (GS) 100mm km 1,520,000.00
Transmission Network (GS) 150mm km 1,200,000.00
Transmission Network (GS) 200mm km 1,462,000.00
Transmission Network (HDPE)
km 1,152,000.00
100mm
Transmission Network (HDPE)
km 1,462,000.00
200mm
Distribution Network (uPVC) km 565,000.00
2 Distribution Network (GS) km 565,000.00
Distribution Network (HDPE) km 830,000.00

Table 108: Unit Rate for Environmental Activity Area

Unit Rate
S.no Feature Class Unit
(Br)
1 Open Masonry Drain Km 3,384,000.00
2 Closed Masonry (Concrete) Drain Km 6,082,772.00

7.3 Summary of Replacement Cost and Residual Value of Assets by Strategic Activity Area

Replacement cost (RC) is one of the frequent and common asset valuation methods. It is a measure
of replacement value or the cost of replacing an existing asset with a modern asset of equivalent
capacity. RC is essential tool that informs the monetary value that would be credited to the assets
and the cost of replacement to make sure there is sufficient funding to maintain the network and
facilities in the long term. Based on the inventory of the city asset base and unit rates provided
above, current replacement costs of the city assets are estimated. Accordingly, total current
replacement cost of the Woreta city assets is estimated to be about Birr 919,779,672.30.and the
residual value of the city is 607,351,444.13

Table 109: Summary of Current Replacement Cost and Residual Value of the City Assets

103
 % of
Current
Maintenance Residual Value Asset Deficit Deficit to
Feature Class Replacement
Deficit (Br) (ETB) (ETB) Residual
Cost (ETB)
Value
The Movement Networks 298,215,179.33 21,069,990.35 208,677,329.84 89,537,849.49 43%
Water Supply Network 46%
69,683,026.67 0 47,891,309.91 21,791,716.99
Assets
Environmental Activity 35%
Area 147,537,117.19 5,952,292.36 109,205,137.02 38,331,980.16
Social, Economic and 67%
Supporting Activity Area 404,344,349.11 5,327,109.00 241,577,667.36 162,766,681.76
Total 919,779,672.30 32,349,391.71 607,351,444.13 312,428,228.40 51%

Current Replacement Cost of Woreta City By

Strategic Activity Area (%)
50.00%
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
The Movement Water Supply Environmental Social, Economic
Networks Network Assets Activity Area and Supporting
Activity Area

Figure 36: Contribution of Asset Classes by Strategic Activity Area for the total Replacement Value
of the city assets

104
 Residual Value of Woreta City By Strategic Activity
Area (%)
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
Axis Title

25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Social, Economic
The Movement Water Supply Environmental
and Supporting
Networks Network Assets Activity Area
Activity Area
Series1 34.36% 7.89% 17.98% 39.78%

Figure 37: Contribution of Asset Classes by Strategic Activity Area for the total Residual Value of
the city assets.

7.4 Current Replacement Cost and Residual Value of the Movement Network Assets

7.4.1 Road Surface

The Current replacement cost of the road surfacing movement network assets is estimated to be
about Birr 200,037,966.13. This makes the movement network assets, is highly valued strategic
activity area. The table below demonstrates the replacement value of each feature classes in the
strategic activity area.

Table 110: Current Replacement Cost of the Movement Network Asset- Road

S.no Feature Class Unit Quantity Unit Rate CRC

1 1. Asphalt Road km 0.603377 41,250,000.00 24,889,284.87
2 2. Cobble Stone km 16.980571 8,309,435.53 141,098,957.54
3 3. Gravel Road km 42.222048 2,043,579.44 86,284,109.21
4 12. Earth Pressed km 13.682411 519,400.00 7,106,644.27
73.488407 259,378,995.89

105
 Table 111: Residual Value of the Movement Network Asset- Road
Estimated Current Value of the Movement Network
% Of
Current Depreciated Deficit
S.n Maintenance Current Value Asset Deficit
Feature Class Replacement Replacement To
o Deficit (Br) (Br) (Br)
Cost (Br) Cost (Br) Residual
Value
1 1. Asphalt 24,889,284.87 3,876,764.27 5,097,600.00 3,876,764.27 21,012,520.60 542.01%
2. Cobble
2 141,098,957.54 118,314,576.41 2,000,445.87 118,314,576.41 22,784,381.13 19.26%
Stone
3 6. Gravel 86,284,108.23 55,025,203.77 9,073,816.87 55,025,203.77 31,258,904.47 56.81%
Earthen
4 7,106,644.52 1,350,583.89 4,118,169.60 1,350,583.89 5,756,060.63 426.19%
Pressed
Total 259,378,995.16 178,567,128.33 20,290,032.35 178,567,128.33 80,811,866.83 45.26%

7.4.2 Walkway

The Current replacement cost of the Walkway assets is estimated to be about Birr 6,529,751.00That
contributes significant amount to the strategic activity area. The Table below demonstrates the
replacement value of each feature classes in the strategic activity.

Table 112: Current Replacement Cost of the Movement Network Asset- Walkway
S.no Feature Class Unit Quantity Unit Rate Current Replacement Cost

7 Terrazzo/Clay Tile Km 1.717 3,803,000.00 6,530,684.17

Total 1.717 6,530,684.17

Table 113: Residual Value of the Movement Network Asset- Walkway

% of
Current Depreciated
Residual Asset Deficit to
Feature Class Replacement Replacement Maintenance
Value (Br) Deficit (Br) Residual
Cost (Br) Cost (Br) Deficit (Br)
Value
Terrazzo/Clay Tile 6,530,684.17 4,858,776.51 - 4,858,776.51 1,671,907.66 34%
Total 6,530,684.17 4,858,776.51 - 4,858,776.51 1,671,907.66 34%

106
7.4.3 Road Structures

Road structures such as culverts have an estimated replacement cost of Birr 27,456,000.00

Table 114: Current Replacement Cost and Residual value of the Movement Network
Asset- Road structure

S.no Feature Class Unit Quantity Unit Rate Current Replacement Cost

1 Culvert N0 176 156,000.00 27,456,000.00

Total 176 27,456,000.00

Table 115: Residual Value of the Movement Network Asset- Road Structure
% of
Current Depreciated
Feature Residual Asset
Deficit to
Replacement Replacement Maintenance
Class Value (Br) Deficit (Br)
Residual
Cost (Br) Cost (Br) Deficit (Br)
Value
Culvert 27,456,000.00 24,206,000.00 - 24,206,000.00 3,250,000.00 13%
Total 27,456,000.00 24,206,000.00 - 24,206,000.00 3,250,000.00 13%

7.4.4 Street Lights

Street light, aggregately have a replacemnt cost of Birr 4,849,500.00 as of the current bases.

Table 116: Current Replacement Cost of the Movement Network Asset- Street Light,
Unit Current Replacement
S.no Feature Class Unit Quantity
Rate Cost
1 High-pressure Sodium Lamp (HPS) N0 183 26,500.00 4,849,500.00
Total 183 4,849,500.00

Table 117: Residual value of the Movement Network Asset- Street Light
% of
Mainte
Current Depreciated Deficit
nance Residual Asset
Feature Class Replacement Replacement to
Deficit Value (Br) Deficit (Br)
Cost (Br) Cost (Br) Residual
(Br)
Value
High Pressure Sodium Lamp
4,849,500.00 1,045,425.00 1,045,425.00 3,804,075.00 364%
(HPS)
Total 4,849,500.00 1,045,425.00 1,045,425.00 3,804,075.00 364%

107
7.5 Current Replacement Cost and Residual Value of Water Supply Network

The Water supply network assets can be replaced with at Birr 69,683,026.67.Water distribution and
transmission lines is representing vast majority of investments of the sector, and also good
proportion of asset deficit indicates their long age that they have been served almost half of their
expected useful life. Thus, the municipality would consider replacement plan of such aged assets
along with a need for preventive and reactive maintenance to extend the service life of water system
asset that are expensive to replace in short term.

Table 118: Current Replacement Cost of Above Ground Water Supply Network Assets
Current Replacement
S.no Feature Class Unit Qty Unit Rate
Cost
Public tap (Water point) no 9 400,000.00 3,600,000.00
1 Water Wall (50m < Depth <100m) no 4 1,000,000.00 4,000,000.00
1.1 Booster Pump Diam 100 no 2 754,000.00 1,508,000.00
1.2 Booster Pump Diam 200 no 1 884,000.00 884,000.00
2.1 Reservoir (1000m3) no 1 10,200,000.00 10,200,000.00
2.2 Reservoir (360 m3) no 1 6,630,000.00 6,630,000.00
2.3 Reservoir (100m3) no 3 5,002,000.00 15,006,000
Total 41,828,000.00

Table 119: Current Replacement Cost of Below Ground Water Supply Network Assets
Current
S.no Feature Class Unit Quantity Unit Rate Replacement
Cost
Transmission Network (GS)
km 3.801723 1,520,000.00 4,379,584.55
100mm(HDPE) 100mm
1 Transmission Network (GS) 150mm km 1.918164 1,200,000.00 2,301,797.19
Transmission Network (GS) 200mm and
km 6.081737 1,462,000.00 8,891,500.11
(HDPE) 200mm
2 Distribution Network (GS) km 16.95115 565,000.00 9,577,399.75
Distribution Network (HDPE) km 3.258729 830,000.00 2,704,745.07
Total 32.011503 27,855,026.67

108
 Current Replacement Cost Water Supplay Asset
Above Ground
Water Supplay
Network Asset
39.97%
Above Ground
Water Supplay Above Ground Water Supplay
Network Network Asset
Asset, 60.03% Below Ground Water Supplay
Network Asset

Figure 38: The Share of Water System Assets for CRC of Water Supply Network

Table 120: Residual Value Cost of Above Ground Water Supply Network Assets
% of
Mainte
Current Depreciated Deficit
nance Residual Asset Deficit
Feature Class Replacement Replacement to
Deficit Value (Br) (Br)
Cost (Br) Cost (Br) Residua
(Br)
l Value
Public tap (Water point) 3,600,000.00 1,100,000.00 0
1,100,000.00
2,500,000.00 2.27
Water Wall (50m <
4,000,000.00 2,980,000.00 0 2,980,000.00 1,020,000.00 34%
Depth <100m)
Booster Pump Diam 150
2,392,000.00 176,800.00 0 2,215,200.00 1253%
and 200 176,800.00
Reservoir (1000m3) 10,200,000.00 8,840,000.00 0 8,840,000.00 1,360,000.00 15%

Reservoir (360 m3) 6,630,000.00 4,309,500.00 0 2,320,500.00 54%

4,309,500.00
Reservoir (100m3) 15,006,000.00 11,004,400.00 0 11,004,400.00 4,001,600.00 36%
Total 41,828,000.00 28,410,700.00 28,410,700.00 13,417,300.00

109
 Table 121: Residual Value Cost of Below Ground Water Supply Network Assets
Main % Of
tenan Deficit
Current Depreciated
S.n ce Residual Value Asset Deficit to
Feature Class Replacement Replacement
o Defic (Br) (Br) Residu
Cost (Br) Cost (Br)
it al
(Br) Value
Transmission
1 15,572,881.85 12,391,831.87 - 12,391,831.87 3,181,049.99 26%
Network
Distribution
2 12,282,145.05 7,088,778.05 - 7,088,778.05 5,193,367.00 73%
Net work
Total 27,855,026.90 19,480,609.91 19,480,609.91 8,374,416.99 43%

7.6 Current Replacement Cost and Residual Value of Environmental Activity Area

The environmental activity area can be replaced with 147,537,117.19 that makes the strategic
category is the third valued assets which would suggest that the drainage facilities and the absence
of modern waste facilities contribute to the relatively smallest value of the category.

Table 122: Current Replacement Cost of Environmental Activity Area

% of
Deficit
Current Depreciated Maintenanc
S.n Feature Residual Asset Deficit to
Replacement Replacement e Deficit
o Class Value (Br) (Br) Residu
Cost (Br) Cost (Br) (Br)
al
Value
Closed
1 Masonry 20,615,558.72 11,177,319.86 859,078.40 11,177,319.86 9,438,238.86 84%
Drain
Open
2 Masonry 92,108,360.05 78,038,019.57 2,457,647.52 78,038,019.57 14,070,340.48 18%
Drain
112,723,918.7
Sub Total 89,215,339.43 3,316,725.92 89,215,339.43 23,508,579.34 26%
7
Community
8 2,351,117.91 579,035.40 117,555.90 579,035.40 1,772,082.52 306%
Greeneries
Recreational
9 areas 810,019.00 243,006.00 26,558.00 243,006.00 567,013.00 233%
Greenery
Street side
10 1,050,108.16 787,581.12 26,901.18 787,581.12 262,527.04 33%
Greenery
11 Seedling Site 143,033.14 104,890.97 7,151.66 104,890.97 38,142.17 36%
12 Hand craft 21,600.00 16,200.00 732 16,200.00 5,400.00 33%

110
13 Dust Bins 175,000.00 67,500.00 4250 67,500.00 107,500.00 159%
14 Public Toilets 11,853,600.00 8,281,520.00 281,520.00 8,281,520.00 3,572,080.00 43%
Communal
15 10,718,400.00 5,808,560.00 278,088.00 5,808,560.00 4,909,840.00 85%
toilet
Temporary
16 Solid Waste 7,690,320.21 4,101,504.11 384,516.01 4,101,504.11 3,588,816.10 88%
dump site
Sub Total 34,813,198.42 19,989,797.60 1,127,272.74 19,989,797.60 14,823,400.82 74%
147,537,117.1 109,205,137.0
Total 109,205,137.02 4,443,998.66 38,331,980.16 35%
9 2

7.7 Current Replacement Cost of Social and Economic Activity Area and Supporting Services

Assets in Social and Economic Activity Area valued at Birr 348,720,302.03representing assume as
38.5 % of the replacement value of the city assets.

Table 123: Replacement Cost of Social and Economic Strategic Area Assets
Total Area
Quantity/ Current
in M2 Unit
S/n Feature Class Unit No. of Replacement
/Actual Rate Cost (Br)
Buildings
length in M
Social and Economic Strategic Area
1 Education Bldgs. No. 66 17,267.87 15,625.00 220,489,881.21
2 Health Bldgs. No. 13 1,974.10 15,625.00 28,011,934.06
3 Youth Bldgs. No. 4 632.06 8,372.59 6,562,836.32
4 Other Bldgs. Office No. 2 150.62 7,499.98 1,698,498.10
5 Other Bldgs. Fence No. 3 837.78 9,000.00 6,506,477.05
6 MSE Bldgs. No. 17 4,729.01 6,235.92 46,965,941.03
7 Housing Bldgs. No. 125 6,069.08 6,100.00 37,021,401.76
8 Abattoir Bldg. No. 4 168.2 8,700.00 1,463,332.48
234 348,720,302.03
The supporting services composed of administrative buildings and machineries and vehicles. The
study tried to include the fences of all municipal facilities and buildings and valued under this
category. The value of supporting services at replacement cost is then estimated to be Birr
55,624,047.08

Table 124: Replacement Cost of Supporting Services Area

111
 Total Current
Quantity/No.
V. Supporting Services Unit Area in Unit Rate Replacement
of Buildings
M2 Cost
1 Admin Buildings No. 32 5,104.18 15,625 46,224,047.08
sub total 46,224,047.08
Machineries and
2 No. 13 13 723,076.92 9,400,000.00
Vehicles
Sub total 9,400,000.00
Supporting Services Total 55,624,047.08

Excessive asset deficit of municipal buildings, except recently constructed Abattoir facilities and
new school buildings, are reflected by the larger gab between the replacement cost and current
values of the building assets. Such excessive asset deficit, nearly 50 % of the asset values, is a n
indication of the loss and decline in service potential due to ageing, let alone the big maintenance
backlog that is not included to estimate the current value that would have turn down the estimated
current value much less than what is now estimated.

curent replacement cost of socio -economic activity

0.6
54.53%
0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2
11.43%
11.62% 9.16%
0.1 6.93%
2.32%
1.62% 0.42% 1.61% 0.36%
0

Figure 39: Current Replacement cost of Socio-Economic Activity Area

Table 125: Estimated Current Value of Social, Economic & Supporting Services

112
Social and % of
Economic Deficit
Current Depreciated Maintenanc
Strategic Area to
Replacement Replacement e Deficit Residual Value Asset Deficit
and Residu
Cost Cost (Br) (Br)
Supportive al
Area Value
Education
1 220,489,881.21 142,123,467.30 1,970,923.84 142,123,467.30 78,366,413.92 55%
Bldgs.
Health
2 28,011,934.06 12,669,468.11 152,193.71 12,669,468.11 15,342,465.94 121%
Bldgs.
Youth
3 6,562,836.32 5,071,043.39 51,548.06 5,071,043.39 1,491,792.93 29%
Bldgs.
Other
4 Bldgs. 1,698,498.10 1,557,301.49 12,583.53 1,557,301.49 141,196.62 9%
Office
Other
5 Bldgs. 6,506,477.05 6,090,416.59 0 6,090,416.59 416,060.47 7%
Fence
6 MSE Bldgs. 46,965,941.03 38,157,715.75 598,936.18 38,157,715.75 8,808,225.28 23%
Housing
7 37,021,401.76 8,158,911.53 662,918.20 8,158,911.53 28,862,490.24 354%
Bldgs.
Abattoir
8 1,463,332.48 1,316,999.23 33,183.10 1,316,999.23 146,333.25 11%
Bldg.
Sub Total 348,720,302.03 215,145,323.39 3,482,286.62 215,145,323.39 133,574,978.64 62%
Admin
1 46,224,047.08 25,740,293.96 475,356.56 25,740,293.96 20,483,753.12 80%
Buildings
Machinerie
2 s and 9,400,000.00 692,050.00 0 692,050.00 8,707,950.00 1258%
Vehicles
Sub Total 55,624,047.08 26,432,343.96 475,356.56 26,432,343.96 29,191,703.12 110%

Total 404,344,349.11 241,577,667.36 3,957,643.18 241,577,667.36 162,766,681.76 67%

The estimation of current value also indicates the assets they already serving beyond their expected
useful life so they assigned Birr 10 to indicate their zero-accounting residual value, as
recommended in the property management direction of the country, as assets will never be assigned
a negative value.

113
8. STEP 7: COST, PRIORITIZE, NEW WORK PROJECTS WITHIN THE CIP
PROCESS
8.1 Introduction

The proposed new work projects for the year 2015 to 2017 EFY of Wereta is prepared based on
different sources including the city CIP prepared for the same project years. The CIP plan has been
prepared based on the need assessment gathered from repeated community consultation held in each
sub city of the city. The new works projects also consider the need for rehabilitation works derived
from asset inventory and condition inspection of this study.

The new works give emphasis for upgrading of infrastructure and facilities in the existing areas.
Preparation of the new works project proposal passed all necessary project planning steps from
project identification to prefeasibility study and appraising and evaluation from socioeconomic
objectivities, environmental and financial viabilities. The appraising steps has been also includes
prioritizing the proposed projects based on different development perspectives and the city financial
and implementation capacities and other criteria set in the CIP guideline and AMP manual.

The proposed new works are then presented by CIP format and further presented and discussed by
strategic activity area and feature classes as per the recently revised AMP manual.

8.2 Unit Rates for New Works

Unit cost information that has been set and presented in step 6 for the purpose of valuation and
costing of the city assets is considered and employed to plan and costing the new works projects. As
explained in the step 6, some of the unit rates provided for construction and acquisition of new
works and new assets has been set by the municipality itself considering the current market and
availability of resources. Some of the unit cost information, as explained in the former steps,
adopted from different reliable sources and adjusted for the local conditions.

8.3 Community Need Assessment

As mentioned above the community needs assessments for infrastructures and municipal services
has been gathered through intensive community consultation at Keble levels. The need assessments
primarily gathered and analyzed to identify the new works proposal. It has also been a base to

114
consider the distribution of new projects in equity manner across the localities. The summary of the
need assessments is annexed.

8.4 Budgetary Requirement for Infrastructure Rehabilitation

As discussed, and presented in former sections assets that need rehabilitation and or replacement are
identified from the condition assessments. In parallel the financial requirement for rehabilitation is
forecasted. The total forecasted funding need to restore and replace severely deteriorated assets is
estimated about Birr 13,694,152.86 A summary of all rehabilitation projects by activity area is
tabulated below.

Table 126: Rehabilitation Summary

Rehabilitation/
Strategic Activity Area Replacement Forecast
(Birr)
I. The Movement Network Assets
Road
Coble stone Road 337,869.96
Gravel Road 2,794,351.70
Earthen Pressed Road 977,752.32
Sub Total 4,109,973.98
Road Structures
Culvert 1,560,000.00
Sub Total 1,560,000.00
Movement Network Total 5,669,973.98
III. Environmental Strategic Area
Drainage 333,858.67
Open Space Solid Waste Dump Site 7,690,320.21
(Temporary)
Environmental Strategic Area
8,024,178.88
Total
Total Rehabilitation Cost 13,694,152.86

8.5 The Proposed New Work Projects Organized by Strategic Activity Area

The proposal new works projects are identified with in the broad socioeconomic development
objectives of the city and specifically considering the community need assessments. In addition,

115
some of the proposals are identified from the city strategic plan and short- and medium-term plan of
relevant sectorial offices that have been primarily identified the infrastructure and service gaps in
their respective sectors.

In total, the plan proposes Birr 66,074,800.44 for new works projects in 2015 EFY excluding Birr
13,694,152.86 for rehabilitation works identified from condition assessments of the city assets, the
total budget for new works projects for three years rolling capital investment program is Birr
227,517,941.77 In general, the plan focuses on the movement network asset by 68.34% share of the
total CIP budget. The second focused area is the Other (Compensations) activity area as it covers
12.3% of the budget. It is recommended that the capital investment plan would consider the four

strategic areas as equal proportion.

Table 127: Summary of Three-Year Rolling CIP for EFY 2015 To 2017 by Strategic Area in Birr
Strategic Area EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 Total % of
No
total
A Movement Network 45,507,906.99 52,089,937.94 56,165,615.35 153,763,460.28 67.58%
B Water Supply Network - 2,100,000.00 2,500,000.00 4,600,000.00 2.02%
Economic & Social 1,090,909.08 2,318,600.00 2,968,600.00 6,378,109.08 2.80%
C
Services
D Environmental Services 3,047,333.48 7,163,219.94 13,354,673.78 23,565,227.20 10.36%
E Other(Compensation) 15,000,000.00 9,500,077.50 9,500,077.50 34,000,155.00 14.94%
Consultancy Services - - 250,000.00 250,000.00 0.11%
F for designs and contract
management/supervision
G Capacity Building 1,428,650.89 1,642,948.52 1,889,390.80 4,960,990.21 2.18%
Total 66,074,800.44 74,814,783.90 86,628,357.43 227,517,941.77 100%

116
 THREE YEARS CIP BY
Movement Network
STRATAGIC ACTIVITY AREA

Water Supply Network

0.11% 2.18%
Economic & Social
14.94%
Services
10.36%
Environmental Services
67.58%
Other(Compensation)
2.80%
2.02% Consultancy Services for
designs and contract
management/supervision

Figure 40: Proportion of the three years Capital Investment Plan by Strategic Category

117
 Table 128: Proposed Three Years New Works Projects (Three-Year Rolling CIP 2015-2017)
Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
Pillar 6. Integrated Urban Infrastructure
A Movement Network
1 Roads
1.
Gravel Road Earth Work Km 1 1.41 5,444,628.92 8.24 31,827,192.48 6.78 26,163,059.78 16.43 63,434,881.18
1
1.
Cobblestone Road paving Km 4.70 40,063,278.07 1.57 13,397,504.29 2.39 20,408,313.43 8.67 73,869,095.79
2
2 Cycle Ways, Cycle Paths
Foot paths, pavements,
2.
pedestrian walkways, No 3 1.1 6,665,241.17 1.54 9,344,242.14 2.64 16,009,483.31
1
roundabouts
3 Bridges, fords & culverts
3.
Bridge(New) No 0
1
3.
Culvert(New) No 0 2 200,000.00 3.00 250,000.00 5.00 450,000.00
2
Street lighting pole
4 Km
installation
Bus terminals, bus stops,
5 No
bus stations
Road furniture, including
6 No
road signs, traffic lights
Sub-total Movement
45,507,906.99 12.91 52,089,937.94 13.71 56,165,615.35 32.74 153,763,460.28
Network
B Water Supply Network
1 Water distribution line Km - 0.00
Water line for land
2 Km 2 8 2,100,000.00 8.50 2,500,000.00 16.50 4,600,000.00
released for residential

118
 Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
Sub-total Water Supply
- - 8.00 2,100,000.00 8.50 2,500,000.00 16.50 4,600,000.00
Network
Economic & Social
C
Services
bloc
1 Markets bulding
k
bloc
2 Abattoirs
k
MSE Facilities/Industrial bloc
3 1 1,090,909.08 3 1,668,600.00 4.00 1,768,600.00 8.00 4,528,109.08
Zones k
bloc
Municipal Rental house 1 650,000.00 2.00 1,200,000.00 3.00 1,850,000.00
k
bloc
4 Health Centre‘s & Clinics
k
5 Schools Fence ml - -
Sub-total Economic &
1,090,909.08 2,318,600.00 2,968,600.00 6,378,109.08
Social Services
Total Pillar 6. Integrated Urban
Infrastructure
Pillar 7: Environmental, Green Services & Recreation
D Environmental Services
1 Drainage km 2.5 2,137,380.48 3.00 6,152,784.18 5.50 8,290,164.66
2 Sanitation N0 2 160,000.00 3.00 260,000.00 5.00 420,000.00
3 Solid Waste
3.
Landfill No 1 2,000,000.00 1.00 2,000,000.00
1
3.
Skip Loader N0 1.00 4,231,053.65 1.00 4,231,053.65
2
3.
Area based container No 4.00 400,000.00 4.00 400,000.00
3

119
 Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
3.
Dust bin No 30 90,000.00 35.00 100,000.00 65.00 190000
4
10,000.0 10,000.
5 Urban Greenery m2 1,310,861.19 1,310,861.19
0 00
6 Parks and Play Areas
6.
Park development
1
6.
Sport Field
2
6. Road median fancing 0.6
km 1 3,047,333.48 2.5 2,775,839.46 1.00 5,823,172.94
3 with Greneery 5
Rivers, wetlands,
7 natural areas ,
watershed management
afforstation
Subtotal Environmental
3,047,333.48 7,163,219.94 12,454,699.02 22,665,252.44
Services
Total Pillar 7:
Environmental, Green
Services & Recreation
Pillar 8: Resilient, Inclusive and Safer Cities
Economic & Social
C
Services
Youth/Women Centers
1
& Projects
Fire and Ambulances
2
Services
Subtotal Economic &
Social Services
D Environmental Services

120
 Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
Flood Protection
1 km 6.8 899,974.76 6.8 899,974.76
(retaining walls etc)
Subtotal Environmental
899,974.76 899,974.76
Services
E Other
Lump 15,000,000.0
1 compensation 9,500,077.50 9,500,077.50 34,000,155.00
sum 0
15,000,000.0
Subtotal Other 9,500,077.50 9,500,077.50 34,000,155.00
0
Total Pillar 8: Resilient, Inclusive and
0 0
Safer Cities
Municipal Administration Buildings and Other Projects which cannot be put in Pillars
Total Municipal Administration
Buildings and Other Projects which
cannot be put in Pillars
Consultancy Services for
designs and contract
management/supervision
1 LDP
Bridge Design and
2 1.00 250,000.00 1.00 250,000.00
Con.mgt.
3 Land fill Con.mgt.
4 Street Light Con.mgt
Total Consultancy Services
for designs and contract 250,000.00 250,000.00
management/supervision
Total CIP 64,646,149.55 73,171,835.38 84,738,966.63 49.24 222,556,951.57
Total Capacity Building
1,428,650.89 1,642,948.52 1,889,390.80 4,960,990.21
Plan (from Table 19)

121
 Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
Grand Total
Expenditure (CIP + 66,074,800.44 74,814,783.90 86,628,357.43 49.24 227,517,941.77
CBP)
Total Income 66,074,800.44 74,814,783.90 - 86,628,357.43 227,517,941.77
Surplus/Deficit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

122
8.6 The Proposed New Work Projects (Rehabilitation Projects)

As presented in the summary table above in budgetary requirement for infrastructure rehabilitation
section, the total amount of budget needed is Birr 6,933,894.55 which is that the city would have to
give attention to this big amount of budget. However, the city did not have plan for rehabilitation
projects for the next years, so it is advised that the city shall revise its capital investment plan to
incorporate the rehabilitation work. The detail of rehabilitation projects is attached in the annex.

8.7 Evaluating the Proposed New Works

The proposed new works evaluated from different development objectives and socioeconomic
benefits. Ensuring promoting equity to the local community, strengthen and promoting the urban
local socioeconomic development and attracting investments has been some of the major evaluating
criteria. In addition, creations of job opportunities and protecting and developing the environment,
and promote public health and safety is among the project appraisal criteria employed in identifying
the candidate projects. The appraised new works project proposals are then again ranked by priority
based on the funding capacity of the municipality.

8.7.1 Socioeconomic Objectives and Benefits

The development of infrastructures and services increases the community benefits such as
accessibility, mobility, economic development and social justice. Apart from direct and indirect job
opportunities that can be created from the implementation of proposed projects, the potential local
economic development and business establishments, infrastructure and service development would
trigger more job opportunities to the entire community. It is not need to mention that the developed
infrastructure is the main pulling factor for investment.

8.7.2 Environmental Consideration

Significant portions of the proposed new works projects are directly related to movement network
issues. The development of greenery and parks, improving and expanding waste disposal and
sanitation facilities and the drainage network evidenced that the plan would address critical urban
environmental issues.

123
8.7.3 Financial Consideration

The financial forecast for capital investment plan indicates that the fund for the proposed new work
projects can be obtained from the city own revenue, regional grant, road fund and IDA matching
fund. The forecasted own sources, regional, and external pledged financial sources would ensure
that the proposed projects would be financed with minimum budget risks in the project period. The
Table below presents the financial plan by possible sources for the proposed new works projects.

Table 129: Financial Plan for Proposed New work Projects (2015-2017)

Amount of funding in Birr

S/N Sources of Funding Total for 3
2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 EFY years
IDA Performance Grant 17,747,216.00 20,409,298.40 23,470,693.16 61,627,207.56
1
Regional Contribution
5,324,164.80 6,122,789.52 7,041,207.95 18,488,162.27
2 (…30%)
3 City Contribution(31%) 5,501,636.96 6,326,882.50 7,275,914.88 19,104,434.34
Subtotal: ULGDP II/UIIDP
28,573,017.76 32,858,970.42 37,787,815.99 99,219,804.17
4 (1-3)
Unutilized 2014 UIIDP
747,333.48 - - 747,333.48
5 Budget
Total ULGDP II/
29,320,351.24 32,858,970.42 37,787,815.99 99,967,137.65
6 UIIDP(4+5)
Additional Regional Fund
12,918,911.20 13,427,210.48 13,278,792.05 39,624,913.73
7 for CIP
Additional Municipal Fund
13,964,580.36 18,060,578.10 23,131,749.39 55,156,907.85
8 from Surplus
Additional State Fund from
1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
9 Surplus
10 Community Contributions
11 Other Capital Receipts 8,670,957.64 10,468,024.90 12,430,000.00 31,568,982.54
Total Additional City & 36,754,449.20 41,955,813.48 48,840,541.44 127,550,804.12
12 Regional Fund (7-11)
Other donor fund except
13 ULGDP II/ UIIDP
Total fund available for the
CIP (6+12+13) with 66,074,800.44 74,814,783.90 86,628,357.43 227,517,941.77
14 community contribution
Total fund available for
the CIP 14-10 with 0ut 66,074,800.44 74,814,783.90 86,628,357.43 227,517,941.77
15 community contribution

124
 8.8 Prioritize the New Works Projects by Strategic Activity Area

Along with consideration of key organizational strategic emphases and reviewing and evaluating the proposed new work projects from
socioeconomic and environmental objectives and budgetary constraints, the proposal has been once again revaluated and prioritized
by the city top management.

Table 130: - Prioritization of new projects within the activity area or Annual EFY 2015 EFY CIP Project Detail by Source of Funds
Funding Sources (Amount) , ETB
Total Cost
S/ Un Additional Rolled
Project Qty EFY 2015 ( Regional Additional
N it IDA Grant City Contrib. Regional Budget
ETB) Contrib. City fund
fund from 2014
Pillar 6. Integrated Urban Infrastructure

Movement
A
Network[1]
1 Roads
Cobble Stone 4.70 40,063,278.07 16,859,855.20 5,057,956.56 5,226,555.11 12,918,911.20 - -
k
1.1 Road Paving
m
Work
1.1. Kebele 01 From 0.70 12,918,911.20 12,918,911.20
k
1 Moges Tsega to
m
Hospital
1.1. Kebele 02 From
2 MulugetaTamir
through Fentahun
Addis , lisane Work
, Ertibie k
0.7 4,617,164.60 2,867,804.10 860,341.23 889,019.27
,WoldTensay m
Gebrie Mitku
through Eshet
Gizaw to Seyifu
Kibret

125
 Funding Sources (Amount) , ETB
Total Cost
S/ Un Additional Rolled
Project Qty EFY 2015 ( Regional Additional
N it IDA Grant City Contrib. Regional Budget
ETB) Contrib. City fund
fund from 2014
1.1. Kebele 02 From
3 Bizu Kassa through
Alemu Jember ,
k
Mebrat Mengist 0.73 4,871,209.04 3,025,595.68 907,678.70 937,934.66
through Main
m
Asphalt Ahmed to
Gebirie Mitiku
1.1. kebele 03 From
4 Yetemegn Tilahun
through Mergeta
Esayas, Wolela
Teshome ,
EneYalemwork
k
Jibirile, Mulat 1.06 7,310,237.39 4,540,520.12 1,362,156.04 1,407,561.24
Menigesha ,
m
Tebikew Zinabu,
Abate Mekuaninit ,
Wodaji Alemu
through Kebebush
Alemu to Kuasmeda
1.1. Kebele 04 From
5 Fogera Police
Station through
Mitiku Zewdie
House, selesitu
k
Atsedehitsanat , 0.72 4,907,831.19 3,048,342.35 914,502.71 944,986.13
Akinaw Hailu m
House through
Mesikel Adebabay
to Main gate of St
Gebriel

126
 Funding Sources (Amount) , ETB
Total Cost
S/ Un Additional Rolled
Project Qty EFY 2015 ( Regional Additional
N it IDA Grant City Contrib. Regional Budget
ETB) Contrib. City fund
fund from 2014
1.1. Kebele 04 From
6 Assefa Mesifin
through Molla Jima
, Erisha Sebil ,
k
Worku Menigstie 0.79 5,437,924.65 3,377,592.95 1,013,277.89 1,047,053.81
through Main gate m
of St Gebrail to
Setegn Gobezie
House..
1.2 Gravel Road Earth
k
Work with 1.41 5,444,628.92 - - - - 5,444,628.92 -
m
Drainage
1.2. Kebele 02 From
2 Police Station
through Ahimed
Gashaw , AbiyZena,
AssefaYibrie ,
k
Demelash shoes 1.41 5,444,628.92 5,444,628.92
store, Emebet Adem m
woficho , Tilku
Mesigid through
Tadilo Siraj to Delie
Marew
Sub-total 1.41 45,507,906.99 16,859,855.20 5,057,956.56 5,226,555.11 12,918,911.20 5,444,628.92 -
k
Movement
m
Network
C Economic &
Social Services
1 MSE
Facilities/Industria
l Zones

127
 Funding Sources (Amount) , ETB
Total Cost
S/ Un Additional Rolled
Project Qty EFY 2015 ( Regional Additional
N it IDA Grant City Contrib. Regional Budget
ETB) Contrib. City fund
fund from 2014
1.1 MSEs shade No 1.00 1,090,909.08 1,090,909.08
Sub-total 1.00 1,090,909.08 - - - - 1,090,909.08
Economic &
Social Services
D Other
compensation Lu 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00
m
1 p
su
m
Sub-total Other 15,000,000.00 - - - - 15,000,000.00
Total Pillar 6.
Integrated Urban
Infrastructure
Pillar 7:
Environmental,
Green Services &
Recreation
Environmental
E
Service
1 Drainage
Kebele-01 From
back of sun rise
k
1.1 School to End of 0.12 747,333.48 747,333.48
m
Ephiphany Center
to Eriza River
2 Urban Greenery

128
 Funding Sources (Amount) , ETB
Total Cost
S/ Un Additional Rolled
Project Qty EFY 2015 ( Regional Additional
N it IDA Grant City Contrib. Regional Budget
ETB) Contrib. City fund
fund from 2014
Kebele 04 Youth 0.65 2,300,000.00 2,300,000.00
He
Center House
2.1 cta
Building with
re
walk way.
Sub total 3,047,333.48 - - - - 2,300,000.00 747,333.48
Environmental
Services
Total Pillar 7:
Environmental,
Green Services &
Recreation
Pillar 8: Resilient,
Inclusive and
Safer Cities
Economic &
C
Social Services
Environmental
D
Services
E Other
Subtotal Other
Total Pillar 8:
Resilient,
Inclusive and
Safer Cities
Municipal
Administration
Buildings and
Other Projects
which cannot be

129
 Funding Sources (Amount) , ETB
Total Cost
S/ Un Additional Rolled
Project Qty EFY 2015 ( Regional Additional
N it IDA Grant City Contrib. Regional Budget
ETB) Contrib. City fund
fund from 2014
put in Pillars

Total Municipal
Administration
Buildings and
Other Projects
which cannot be
put in Pillars
Consultancy
Services for
designs and
contract
management/super
vision
Total Consultancy
Services for
designs and
contract
management/super
vision
Total CIP 64,646,149.55 16,859,855.20 5,057,956.56 5,226,555.11 12,918,911.20 23,835,538.00 747,333.48
Total Capacity
Building Plan 1,428,650.89 887,360.80 266,208.24 275,081.85
(from Table 19)
Grand Total 66,074,800.44 17,747,216.00 5,324,164.80 5,501,636.96 12,918,911.20 23,835,538.00 747,333.48
Expenditure (CIP
+ CBP)
Total Income 66,074,800.44 17,747,216.00 5,324,164.80 5,501,636.96 12,918,911.20 23,835,538.00 747,333.48

130
 Funding Sources (Amount) , ETB
Total Cost
S/ Un Additional Rolled
Project Qty EFY 2015 ( Regional Additional
N it IDA Grant City Contrib. Regional Budget
ETB) Contrib. City fund
fund from 2014
Surplus/Deficit (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) - 0.00 -

131
 Table 131: - Prioritization of new projects within the activity area

Sr. No. New Projects Priority

1 Movement Network
1.1 Cobble stone road
I
1.2 Cobble stone Pavement
1.3 Gravel road
1.4 Culvert II
1.5 Street Light
ⅲ
2 Environmental Activity Area
2.1 Closed Masonry Drainage Network
2.2 Green Area Development I
3 Social and Economic Activity Area I
3.1 MSCE shed I
4 Capacity Building ⅱ

Below is the summary of approved budget for the new works projects for the 2015 EFY by each
activity area of the asset.

Table 132: - Approved budget for new work projects

Movement Network 67.58%

Water Supply Network 2.02%
Economic & Social 2.80%
Services
Environmental Services 10.36%

Other(Compensation) 14.94%
Consultancy Services for 0.11%
designs and contract
management/supervision
Capacity Building 2.18%

132
9. STEP :-8 BUILD THE MAINTENANCE PLAN

9.1 General

The role of maintenance to ensure proper functioning of the urban economy and social system
cannot be over emphasized. Maintenance has very important bearing on both the physical and
economic lives and performance of infrastructure and urban facilities. Infrastructure deterioration
and break down are though inevitable but they are controllable. That can only be achieved through
effective maintenance, which is again possible only through proper maintenance plan, program, and
efficient implementation of the program.

As onward steps towards establishing sustainable maintenance management as integral part of

municipal function and asset management system; the three years‘ maintenance program is
prepared based on the condition assessments and preparation of maintenance budget guide that have
been developed in the previous sections.

The maintenance plan presents the three years‘ maintenance schedules and summarizes
maintenance needs identified in former step and the recommended maintenance measures. The
maintenance plan should also entail prioritizing the maintenance need at least for 2014 EFY and
generally will insight the overall maintenance program to be executed in the three years‘ project
period.

9.2 The Maintenance Budget for Routine and Periodic Maintenance Activities

A summary of routine and periodic maintenance for each activity area of the city are presented in
tabular form in the below table. The maintenance activity for each feature class of the asset also
described in the below table under maintenance deficit portion. Routine and periodic maintenance
are supposed to be normal maintenance activities that should be performed to retain an asset that are
found in good condition with intent to minimize and prevent from any risks of failure, damages and
deteriorations.

Normal maintenance comprises actions performed to preserve an asset in its desired condition or
standard and sets out to prevent failure by providing systematic inspection and monitoring to detect
prevent deterioration and or failure and includes from testing to confirm correct operation.

133
According to the revised AMP manual, expected maintenance budget is the lesser of either 2% of
Asset Replacement Cost or 10% of CIP budget would be allocated to routine and periodic
maintenance.

9.3 Maintenance Deficit Summary

The total amount of the maintenance need for the existing assets is approximately about Birr
37,573,240.78 the share of routine and periodic maintenance is about Birr 5,223,848.74 as
presented above and the rest Birr 32,349,392.04 is the accumulated maintenance deficit.

Table 133: Maintenance Deficit Summary

Routine and
Strategic Activity Total
Periodic Maintenance
S.no Area and Feature Maintenance
Maintenance Deficit (Birr)
Class Need (Birr)
(Birr)
I. The Movement
Network Assets
1 Road
1.1 Asphalt Road 2,783,600.00 5,097,600.00 7,881,200.00
1.2 Cobble Stone Road 159,431.25 2,000,445.87 2,159,877.12
1.3 Gravel Road 297,099.80 9,073,816.87 9,370,916.67
Earth Pressed
1.4 40,048.00 4,118,169.60 4,158,217.60
Road
Total Road
3,280,179.05 20,290,032.34 23,570,211.39
Network
2 Footpath 0
2.1 Terrazzo/Clay Tile 31,951.00 0 31,951.00
Total foot path 31,951.00 0 31,951.00
3 Road Structures 0
3.1 Culvert 0 779,958.00 779,958.00
Total culvert 0 779,958.00 779,958.00
4 Street Light 122,694.00 0 122,694.00
Total Street Light 122,694.00 122,694.00
The Movement
3,434,824.05 21,069,990.34 24,504,814.39
Network total
II. Water Supply
Network Assets
Above-Ground
2.1
Assets
2.1.1 Water Wall 4,000 0 4,000
2.1.2 Booster Pump 47,840 0 47,840

134
 Routine and
Strategic Activity Total
Periodic Maintenance
S.no Area and Feature Maintenance
Maintenance Deficit (Birr)
Class Need (Birr)
(Birr)
2.1.3 Reservoirs 159,180 0 159,180
2.1.4 Public Tap 72,000 0 72,000
Sub Total 283,020.00 0 283,020.00
Below-Ground
2.2
Assets
2.2.1 Transmission Line 155.73 155.73
2.2.2 Distribution Line 3,499.00 3,499.00
Sub Total 3,654.73 3,654.73
Water Supply
286,674.73 0 286,674.73
Total
III. Environmental
Strategic Area
3.1 Drainage 289,391.30 3,316,724.00 3,606,115.30
3.2 Greenery 0 2,071,278.36 2,071,278.36
solid wast hand
3.3 0 4,682.00 4,682.00
cart and dust bin
3.4 Toilet Sanitation 1,728 559,608.00 561,336.00
Environmental
Strategic Area 291,119.30 5,952,292.36 6,243,411.66
Total
IV. Social and
Economic Strategic
Area
4.1 Education Bldgs. 254,958.68 3,340,389.98 3,595,348.66
4.2 Health Bldgs. 103,437.28 152,193.71 255,630.99
4.3 Youth Bldgs. 22,205.13 51,548.06 73,753.19
4.4 Other Bldgs. 19,680.00 12,583.55 32,263.55
4.5 MSE Bldgs. 58,704.32 598,936.18 657,640.50
4.6 Abiytor Building 0 33,183.10 33,183.10
4.7 Housing Bldgs. 9,961.33 662,918.20 672,879.53
Social and Economic Strategic Area
468,946.74 4,851,752.78 5,320,699.52
Total
V. Supporting
Services
5.1 Admin Buildings 120,083.92 475,356.56 595,440.48
Machineries and
5.2 622,200.00 0.00 622,200.00
Vehicles
Supporting
742,283.92 475,356.56 1,217,640.48
Services Total
Total Maintenance
Cost
5,223,848.74 32,349,392.04 37,573,240.78

135
 9.4 Prioritizingthe Budget for Maintenance Deficit Reduction

The municipal staff undertakes budgeting for the first project year, the study team considers the
condition assessment for all activity area, and prioritization is done with respect to the budget by
incorporating asset demand and other pre-determined criteria. The criteria provided by the AMP
manuals that have been taken into account while prioritizing includes -

1. Creating an Equitable Balance between Different Strategic Activity Areas

Here the list of strategic areas, i.e. the movement network, environmental services; and the social
and economic services, provides a good basis for evaluation. Note that the maintenance of water
supply assets (the fourth major activity area) operates within its own budgetary framework and as a
result is excluded from this process, although the next bullet points on internal prioritization are
equally relevant to that activity area.

2. Create an Equitable Balance within Each Strategic Activity Area

This is particularly relevant to the road movement network where there is often a strong imbalance
in favor of asphalt road maintenance.

3. Integrate an Asset Strategy in the Prioritization of Maintenance Projects

The third criteria are applicable to all four main activity areas. This is the one brought forward from
the prioritization process for new works projects, namely reviewing projects in terms of an asset
strategy. In the case of maintenance prioritization, the concept of an asset strategy is also valid.
However, the strategic focus is of a more practical nature, with three areas of importance:
utilization/demand; negative impact; and community needs.

9.4.1 MaintenanceActivity of Movement Network Assets

In movement, network activity area each maintenance activity is described in detail and the priority
level of maintenance activity also putted within the feature class.

Table 134: Proposed Maintenance Activities to Address the Maintenance Deficit Moment network

Deterioration Priority
Feature Class Maintenance Activity
Type
Cobble Lifting of Lift out cobblestone in demarcated area. Clean the bed. Lay down a layer
2
Stone Cobble Stone of clean, graded sand and compact. Lay new cobblestones

136
 Deterioration Priority
Feature Class Maintenance Activity
Type
Lift out cobblestone in demarcated area. Clean the bed. Add sub-base
material and compact. Lay a sand bed and compact. Lay new 1
Depression cobblestones.
Lift out cobblestone in demarcated area. Clean the bed. Add sub-base
Cobble Edge material if required and compact. Lay a sand bed and compact. Lay new 2
Failure cobblestones.
Clean out depression, fill with graded material and compact by machine 1
Gravel Depression
Replacing wearing surface, crack seal surface, pave full width, seal joint
between edge of paving and face of wall, pointing masonry, repair
barriers, safety features, slab maintenance, replace walls, saw cut around 1
deterioration, patch with concrete, patch delaminating, replace deck and
Slab Failure floor beam/ column
Cleaning bottom and place concrete in bottom, install liner plate if
capacity allows, remove trees in vicinity of culvert, weld short piece of
rebar across the crack on every other corrugation, replace headwall, 2
excavate and jack back into shape then re-bed and properly backfill,
Siltation excavate and re-waterproof
Culvert
Replacing wearing surface, crack seal surface, pave full width, seal joint
between edge of paving and face of wall, pointing masonry, repair
barriers, safety features, slab maintenance, replace walls, saw cut around 2
deterioration, patch with concrete, patch delaminating, replace deck and
Crack floor beam/ column
Replacing wearing surface, crack seal surface, pave full width, seal joint
between edge of paving and face of wall, pointing masonry, repair
barriers, safety features, slab maintenance, replace walls, saw cut around 1
Abutment deterioration, patch with concrete, patch delaminating, replace deck and
Failure floor beam/ column
Maintenance of street lighting comprises scheduled inspection and
maintenance activity of road patrol, bulk lamp replacement and pole 1
Street Light Non-Functional inspection

137
9.4.2 Maintenance Activity of Water Supply Network Assets

Table 135: Proposed Maintenance Activities to Address the Maintenance Deficit-Water supply
assets
Asset Type Maintenance Activity Priority
Above Ground Regular inspection, repair damages and leakages, maintain
Water Lines from any risks causes breakage, and replace and /or upgrade if 1
severely damaged and needs to raise the capacity.
Below Ground Regular inspection, repair damages and leakages, maintain
Water Lines from any risks causes breakage, and replace and /or upgrade if 2
severely damaged and needs to raise the capacity.

9.4.3 MaintenanceActivity of Environmental Activity Area Assets

Table 136: Proposed Maintenance Activities to Address the Maintenance Deficit-Environmental

activity area
Asset Type Maintenance activity Priority
Drainage Networks Clearing and cleaning of drain systems especially for open drainage 1
DE silting systems is using human power. So that, desilting drains and sewers is
one of the best ways to ensure drainage system to fully operational
and greatly reduces the risk of flooding from wet weather
Communal Toilets frequent inspection, preventive maintenance and correcting the existing 2
damage
Public Toilets Frequent inspection, preventive maintenance and correcting the existing 2
damage
Greenery, Make clean, and suitable for the users 2
Playground and
street side green
Joint Damage Clean out the damaged area and reseal the affected joints with new mortar 2
Floor Damage Clean out the damaged area and construct floor with appropriate lower grade 1
concrete type and construct masonry and cover it if it is covered drainage
system
Wall Collapse Remove all damaged block back to the solid wall. Clean the joints and lay new 1
blocks.

9.4.4 Maintenance Activity of Social and Economic Activity Assets

Table 137: Proposed Maintenance Activities to Address the Maintenance Deficit-Buildings

Buildings Regular inspection, Full servicing and repairing building components,
major repair and component replacement

138
 9.4.5 Prioritized Movement Network Asset Maintenance

Table 138: Prioritization of Maintenance Activities to Address the Maintenance Deficit-Movement

Network
Strategic Activity
Maintenance Conditio Uni Quant Priorit Conditio Quanti Priority Maintenance
Area and Feature
Activity n t ity y II n ty I Deficit (ETB)
Class
I. The Movement Network Assets
Road
Kebele 02 From
kibrom Mengistu
to oak tree, From
Asefa Baye to
Depression
Nitsuh
+Channeling+Was Poor+M 4,069,851.61
Getachew,from
haway+Siltation+n oderate
Ayalnesh Atalel to
on compaction
Bizualem Yekoye
and Drainage from
Bizualem Yekoye
to Haile Tsega.
The Movement Network total 4,069,851.61

9.4.6 Prioritized Environmental Activity Area Maintenance

Table 139: Prioritization of Maintenance Activities to Address the Maintenance Deficit-

Environmental Area
Prio
Strategic Activity Area Condi Uni Qua Cond Qua Priorit Maintenance
Maintenance Activity rity
and Feature Class tion t ntity ition ntity yI Deficit (ETB)
II
Environmental Strategic Area
Drainage

Maintenance of Youth
Center Greneery 2,537,628.43
more widespread deterioration,
development 1o 1o
or damage, requiring some hec
rehabilitation Poor tar 0.65 poor 0.65

Environmental Strategic Area total 2,537,628.43

139
 9.5 Priority Rating to the Maintenance Activities

Maintenance prioritization is done by taking into account the need to achieve a balance in the
breakdown of the maintenance budget between different activity areas. All activity areas with
priority level I need to be addressed irrespective of any bearing. Then, within the activity area the
maintenance activity respective of priority rating scales as primary, secondary and tertiary need to
be addressed based on.

Table 140: - Maintenance activity of open masonry drainage with its priority level
Priority
Priorit Rating Degree/Co
y Level Scale ndition Description Example
Open Masonry –
Critically - The maintenance activities are important and of high Moderate –Wall
o
1 Moderate risk Collapse
Maintenance activities that if not undertaken would Open Masonry –
create a potential risk/discomfort for the users and/or on Moderate –
Priority
Potentially the asset in terms of safety, loss of reputation and asset Major Joint
II o
2 - Moderate integrity and loss of asset value Damage
Maintenance activities that are required but not critical Open Masonry –
and if not undertaken pose a low risk to the asset and/or Moderate –
Necessarily the users in terms of safety, loss of reputation and asset Minor Joint
o
3 – Moderate integrity and loss of asset value Damage

9.6 Three years’ maintenance budget

Budget has been and should be the main challenges in maintenance plan. Traditionally maintenance
has been considered as part of recurrent budget and expenditures. Though, most of cities used to
manage maintenance funding as part of capital budget in recent years following the growing needs
to address the big accumulated maintenance.

The AMP manual recommends that a maximum of 10 % of annual capital investment budget can be
allocated to address maintenance deficit. Nevertheless, regardless of this, the city has allocated a
maintenance budget as presented in the below table. The maintenance budget lacks to address each
activity area of the city rather it focuses only on movement network and environmental activity
areas. As stated above the current maintenance deficit for all activity area is Birr 32,349,392.04

140
However, the city maintenance need Birr 22,751,794.17 for maintaining movement networks,
water supply, environmental activity, and economic and social services areas in three years.

Table 141: - Three Years Maintenance Budget (2015 – 2017EFY)

Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance

Infrastructure Sub- Total Cost for
S/N Budget for Budget for Budget for EFY
Category 3 years
EFY 2015 EFY 2016 2017
A Movement Network
1 Roads
Cobblestone Road
1.1 550,000.00 200,000.00 350,000.00
Paving
1.2 Street Light Sodium 405,003.86 175,003.86 230,000.00
Gravel Road with
1.3 7,282,325.09 4,069,851.61 1,000,000.00 2,212,473.48
Drainage
Pedestrian Side
1.4 450,000.00 0.00 160,000.00 290,000.00
Walkway
1.5 Dump Truck 202,523.72 202,523.72
1.6 Culverts 650,000.00 - 290,000.00 360,000.00
Movement Network
9,539,852.67 4,069,851.61 2,027,527.58 3,442,473.48
Subtotal
Water Supply
B
Network
Water Distribution
800,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00
Lines -
Water Supply Subtotal 800,000.00 0.00 300,000.00 500,000.00
Environmental
C
Network
Masonry Drainage
1 1,853,997.34 900,000.00 953,997.34
with dich cover
Youth center greenery
3,087,628.43 2,537,628.43 200,000.00 350,000.00
development
Seeding Site
140,000.00 140,000.00
Development fence
Public Toilet 230,000.00 100,000.00 130,000.00
Communal Toilet 185,000.00 100,000.00 85,000.00
Environmental Service
5,496,625.77 2,537,628.43 1,300,000.00 1,658,997.34
Subtotal
Economic And Social
D -
Services

141
 Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance
Infrastructure Sub- Total Cost for
S/N Budget for Budget for Budget for EFY
Category 3 years
EFY 2015 EFY 2016 2017
MSE Sheds 460,000.00 200,000.00 260,000.00
Kebele Housing 495,000.00 250,000.00 245,000.00
Adminsration building
1,641,000.00 1,285,000.00 356,000.00
maintenace
School maintenace 2,323,852.40 1,151,487.48 1,172,364.92
abaiter maintenace 450,000.00 200,000.00 250,000.00
youth center buildgs 269,870.33 169,870.33 100,000.00
Economic And Social
5,639,722.73 0.00 3,256,357.81 2,383,364.92
Services Subtotal
E Others
Electric Distribution
1,275,593.00 597,593.00 678,000.00
Lines
Others Subtotal 1,275,593.00 0.00 597,593.00 678,000.00
Total Maintenance 22,751,794.17 6,607,480.04 7,481,478.39 8,662,835.74

9.7 Projects Proposed for Maintenance

The projects proposed for maintenance in the coming year are presented in the below tables by
activity areas. The details of each feature class maintenance activity of the asset are included in the
annex.

9.8 Summary of Maintenance Budget

A detail breakdown of budget allocated to the reduction of the maintenance deficit to each feature
class of the asset is shown below. The budget is coinciding with the three years rolling plan budget
of the city for maintenance. Including the routine and periodic maintenance the total maintenance
need of Wereta city is Birr 27,274,616.00.but the actual maintenance budget allocated by the city
irrespective of the recommendation of maintenance budget allocation by AMP Manual is Birr
30,636,813.89 which addresses the movement network, water supply, environmental activity and
economic and social service area the normal maintenance activity, the approved budget for
maintenance deficit is evenly distributed in order to address all activity areas.

142
 Table 142: Annual Action Plan for Maintenance Budget for EFY 2015
Implementation Period
S.N total budget
Description Of Activities Category Unit Annual Total For
o Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 in 2015
EFY 2015
A Movement Network
Maintenance of Gravel Road
1 1,387,449.41 1,849,932.55 832,469.65 4,069,851.61 4,069,851.61
with Storm water drainage
Kebele 02 From kibrom Physical km 0.30 0.40 0.18 0.88
Mengistu through oak tree,
Asefa Baye , Nitsuh Getachew,
1.1 Ayalnesh Atalel ,
BizualemYekoye , Drainage Financial Birr 1,387,449.41 1,849,932.55 832,469.65 4,069,851.61 4,069,851.61
through Bizualem Yekoye to
Haile Tsega.

Sub total Movement Network 1,387,449.41 1,849,932.55 832,469.65 4,069,851.61 4,069,851.61

B Environmental Network
1 Urban Greneery
Maintenance of Youth Center Hect
Physical 0.15 0.30 0.65
Greneery development are 0.20
1.1
Financial Birr 585,606.56 1,171,213.12 2,537,628.43 2,537,628.43
780,808.75
Sub total Environmental
585,606.56 1,171,213.12 780,808.75 2,537,628.43 2,537,628.43
Network
Total Maintenance 1,973,055.97 3,021,145.67 1,613,278.40 6,607,480.04 6,607,480.04

143
10. Step 9: CONVERT THE NEW WORKS PROJECTS AND THE MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES BUDGETS TO 3-YEAR ROLLING PROGRAM
The three years‘ new works and maintenance projects are identified in the previous sections. In
parallel, the budget required for new works and maintenance projects are estimated. In this section,
efforts have made to summarize and convert the new work project proposal and maintenance plan
into three years rolling program.

10.1 Three Years Rolling Program for New Works Projects

The Plan proposes a total of about Birr 227,517,941.77 for new works projects in the three years
rolling program excluding Birr 13,694,152.86 needed for rehabilitation identified in the condition
assessment.

In line with the approved budget, the new projects quantities and budgets are structure within the
three project years as tabulated in the table.

144
 Table 143: Three Year Rolling CIP for the City of Woreta. (EFY 2015 to 2017)
Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
Pillar 6. Integrated Urban Infrastructure
A Movement Network
1 Roads
1.
Gravel Road Earth Work Km 1 1.41 5,444,628.92 8.24 31,827,192.48 6.78 26,163,059.78 16.43 63,434,881.18
1
1.
Cobblestone Road paving Km 4.70 40,063,278.07 1.57 13,397,504.29 2.39 20,408,313.43 8.67 73,869,095.79
2
2 Cycle Ways, Cycle Paths
Foot paths, pavements,
2.
pedestrian walkways, No 3 1.1 6,665,241.17 1.54 9,344,242.14 2.64 16,009,483.31
1
roundabouts
3 Bridges, fords & culverts
3.
Bridge(New) No 0
1
3.
Culvert(New) No 0 2 200,000.00 3.00 250,000.00 5.00 450,000.00
2
Street lighting pole
4 Km
installation
Bus terminals, bus stops,
5 No
bus stations
Road furniture, including
6 No
road signs, traffic lights
Sub-total Movement
45,507,906.99 12.91 52,089,937.94 13.71 56,165,615.35 32.74 153,763,460.28
Network
B Water Supply Network
1 Water distribution line Km - 0.00
Water line for land
2 Km 2 8 2,100,000.00 8.50 2,500,000.00 16.50 4,600,000.00
released for residential

145
 Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
Sub-total Water Supply
- - 8.00 2,100,000.00 8.50 2,500,000.00 16.50 4,600,000.00
Network
Economic & Social
C
Services
bloc
1 Markets bulding
k
bloc
2 Abattoirs
k
MSE Facilities/Industrial bloc
3 1 1,090,909.08 3 1,668,600.00 4.00 1,768,600.00 8.00 4,528,109.08
Zones k
bloc
Municipal Rental house 1 650,000.00 2.00 1,200,000.00 3.00 1,850,000.00
k
bloc
4 Health Centre‘s & Clinics
k
5 Schools Fence ml - -
Sub-total Economic &
1,090,909.08 2,318,600.00 2,968,600.00 6,378,109.08
Social Services
Total Pillar 6. Integrated Urban
Infrastructure
Pillar 7: Environmental, Green Services & Recreation
D Environmental Services
1 Drainage km 2.5 2,137,380.48 3.00 6,152,784.18 5.50 8,290,164.66
2 Sanitation N0 2 160,000.00 3.00 260,000.00 5.00 420,000.00
3 Solid Waste
3.
Landfill No 1 2,000,000.00 1.00 2,000,000.00
1
3.
Skip Loader N0 1.00 4,231,053.65 1.00 4,231,053.65
2
3.
Area based container No 4.00 400,000.00 4.00 400,000.00
3

146
 Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
3.
Dust bin No 30 90,000.00 35.00 100,000.00 65.00 190000
4
10,000.0 10,000.
5 Urban Greenery m2 1,310,861.19 1,310,861.19
0 00
6 Parks and Play Areas
6.
Park development
1
6.
Sport Field
2
6. Road median fancing 0.6
km 1 3,047,333.48 2.5 2,775,839.46 1.00 5,823,172.94
3 with Greneery 5
Rivers, wetlands,
7 natural areas ,
watershed management
afforstation
Subtotal Environmental
3,047,333.48 7,163,219.94 12,454,699.02 22,665,252.44
Services
Total Pillar 7:
Environmental, Green
Services & Recreation
Pillar 8: Resilient, Inclusive and Safer Cities
Economic & Social
C
Services
Youth/Women Centers
1
& Projects
Fire and Ambulances
2
Services
Subtotal Economic &
Social Services
D Environmental Services

147
 Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
Flood Protection
1 km 6.8 899,974.76 6.8 899,974.76
(retaining walls etc)
Subtotal Environmental
899,974.76 899,974.76
Services
E Other
Lump 15,000,000.0
1 compensation 9,500,077.50 9,500,077.50 34,000,155.00
sum 0
15,000,000.0
Subtotal Other 9,500,077.50 9,500,077.50 34,000,155.00
0
Total Pillar 8: Resilient, Inclusive and
0 0
Safer Cities
Municipal Administration Buildings and Other Projects which cannot be put in Pillars
Total Municipal Administration
Buildings and Other Projects which
cannot be put in Pillars
Consultancy Services for
designs and contract
management/supervision
1 LDP
Bridge Design and
2 1.00 250,000.00 1.00 250,000.00
Con.mgt.
3 Land fill Con.mgt.
4 Street Light Con.mgt
Total Consultancy Services
for designs and contract 250,000.00 250,000.00
management/supervision
Total CIP 64,646,149.55 73,171,835.38 84,738,966.63 49.24 222,556,951.57
Total Capacity Building
1,428,650.89 1,642,948.52 1,889,390.80 4,960,990.21
Plan (from Table 19)

148
 Pr EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 THREE YEAR TOTAL
io
N ECSPG Pillar & Project
Unit rit Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr Qty Birr
o Name
y
Grand Total
Expenditure (CIP + 66,074,800.44 74,814,783.90 86,628,357.43 49.24 227,517,941.77
CBP)
Total Income 66,074,800.44 74,814,783.90 - 86,628,357.43 227,517,941.77
Surplus/Deficit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

149
Table 144: Summary of Approved 3-Year New Works Rolling Program by Strategic Activity Areas
Strategic Area EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017 Total
% of
No
total
A Movement Network 45,507,906.99 52,089,937.94 56,165,615.35 153,763,460.28 67.58%
B Water Supply Network - 2,100,000.00 2,500,000.00 4,600,000.00 2.02%
Economic & Social 1,090,909.08 2,318,600.00 2,968,600.00 6,378,109.08 2.80%
C
Services
D Environmental Services 3,047,333.48 7,163,219.94 13,354,673.78 23,565,227.20 10.36%
E Other(Compensation) 15,000,000.00 9,500,077.50 9,500,077.50 34,000,155.00 14.94%
Consultancy Services for - - 250,000.00 250,000.00 0.11%
F designs and contract
management/supervision

G Capacity Building 1,428,650.89 1,642,948.52 1,889,390.80 4,960,990.21 2.18%

Total 66,074,800.44 74,814,783.90 86,628,357.43 227,517,941.77 100%

As can be seen from the Figure below, the lion share of the proposed new work projects are for the
development of movement networks. Environmental activity area is the next focused area of the
municipality which constitutes a good proportion of the proposed projects

THREE YEARS CIP BY

Movement Network
STRATAGIC ACTIVITY AREA

2.18% Water Supply Network

0.11%
14.94%
Economic & Social
10.36% Services

67.58% Environmental Services

2.80% Other(Compensation)
2.02%

Figure 41: Summary of Approved 3-Year New Works Rolling Program by Strategic Activity Areas

150
10.2 The 3-Year Rolling Program for Maintenance Projects

The three - year rolling program for maintenance projects are identified and would be included in
the city three years‘ midterm financial plan. The total estimated maintenance budget for three years
rolling program is about Birr 22,751,794.17. It is proposed based on the identified maintenance gap
and backlogs, prioritization and considering financial capacity of the municipality. Following is the
summary of maintenance plan by strategic activity area.

Like to new works projects, the largest proportion of maintenance projects is proposed for
movement networks. Social and economic activity area and environmental activity area covers
almost the same proportion.

Table 145: Three Years Rolling Program Maintenance Budget for EFY 2015 to 2017

Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance

Infrastructure Sub- Total Cost for
S/N Budget for Budget for Budget for
Category 3 years
EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017
A Movement Network
1 Roads
Cobblestone Road
1.1 550,000.00 200,000.00 350,000.00
Paving
1.2 Street Light Sodium 405,003.86 175,003.86 230,000.00
Gravel Road with
1.3 7,282,325.09 4,069,851.61 1,000,000.00 2,212,473.48
Drainage
Pedestrian Side
1.4 450,000.00 0.00 160,000.00 290,000.00
Walkway
1.5 Dump Truck 202,523.72 202,523.72
1.6 Culverts 650,000.00 - 290,000.00 360,000.00
Movement Network
9,539,852.67 4,069,851.61 2,027,527.58 3,442,473.48
Subtotal
B Water Supply Network
Water Distribution
800,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00
Lines -
Water Supply Subtotal 800,000.00 0.00 300,000.00 500,000.00
Environmental
C
Network

151
 Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance
Infrastructure Sub- Total Cost for
S/N Budget for Budget for Budget for
Category 3 years
EFY 2015 EFY 2016 EFY 2017

Masonry Drainage with

1 1,853,997.34 900,000.00 953,997.34
dich cover
Youth center greenery
3,087,628.43 2,537,628.43 200,000.00 350,000.00
development
Seeding Site
140,000.00 140,000.00
Development fence
Public Toilet 230,000.00 100,000.00 130,000.00
Communal Toilet 185,000.00 100,000.00 85,000.00
Environmental Service
5,496,625.77 2,537,628.43 1,300,000.00 1,658,997.34
Subtotal
Economic And Social
D -
Services
MSE Sheds 460,000.00 200,000.00 260,000.00
Kebele Housing 495,000.00 250,000.00 245,000.00
Adminsration building
1,641,000.00 1,285,000.00 356,000.00
maintenace
School maintenace 2,323,852.40 1,151,487.48 1,172,364.92
abaiter maintenace 450,000.00 200,000.00 250,000.00
youth center buildgs 269,870.33 169,870.33 100,000.00
Economic And Social
5,639,722.73 0.00 3,256,357.81 2,383,364.92
Services Subtotal
E Others
Electric Distribution
1,275,593.00 597,593.00 678,000.00
Lines
Others Subtotal 1,275,593.00 0.00 597,593.00 678,000.00
Total Maintenance 22,751,794.17 6,607,480.04 7,481,478.39 8,662,835.74

152
11. Step 10: MANAGE THE TRANSITION OF ALL COMPLETED NEW WORKS
AND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS ACROSS TO THE EXISTING ASSETS
DATABASES

11.1 Build the Implementation schedule for New Work Projects for Year-1

Tracking of New Works and Maintenance projects is a critical component of Asset Management
Plan. According to the revised Asset management manual of the Ministry of Urban development
and Housing in June 2016; the new works and maintenance projects should be tracked. The
integration of the AMP process into a GIS-based management system enables both new works
projects and maintenance activities to be tracked with a degree of accuracy that was not available in
the past. This means that, for the first time, it is possible to measure the performance of past
projects and activities against the original plan. Accordingly; all the new work projects will be
incorporated in the geo-database and will be tracked as clearly depicted in table below.

153
 Table 146: Implementation Schedule of All New works for 2015 EFY
Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
Total Cost Bid
S/N Project U Qt EFY 2015 ( Closin Date Mobilizati Substanti
Bid g Contra Date on al Date of
nit y ETB)
Invitation Openin ct Contract AdvanceP Completio Asset
Date g Award Signature ayment n Registry
Pillar 6. Integrated Urban Infrastructure

Movement
A
Network[1]
Cobble Stone Road 4.70
Paving Work k 40,063,278.07
1.1
m

1.1. Kebele 01 From 0.70

1 Moges Tsega to 12,918,911.20 11- 1- 23- 30- 12- 12- 16-
Hospital k Oct/2022 Nov/20 Nov/20 Nov/2022 Dec/2022 April/2023 April/202
m 22 22 3

1.1. Kebele 02 From

2 MulugetaTamir 25-
through Fentahun 17- 23- 30- 30- 10-
3-Oct/2022 Oct/202
Addis , lisane Work , k Nov/20 Nov/2022 Nov/2022 Feb/2023 mar/2023
0.7 2
Ertibie ,WoldTensay m 4,617,164.60 22
Gebrie Mitku through
Eshet Gizaw to Seyifu
Kibret
1.1. Kebele 02 From Bizu
Kassa through Alemu 23- 30- 10-
3 3-Oct/2022 30-
Jember , Mebrat k 25- 17- Nov/2022 Nov/2022 mar/2023
0.73 Feb/2023
Mengist through Main m 4,871,209.04
Oct/202 Nov/20
Asphalt Ahmed to

154
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
Total Cost Bid
S/N Project U Qt EFY 2015 ( Closin Date Mobilizati Substanti
Bid g Contra Date on al Date of
nit y ETB)
Invitation Openin ct Contract AdvanceP Completio Asset
Date g Award Signature ayment n Registry
Gebirie Mitiku from 2 22
Ahmed to Gebirai
Mitiku - -
1.1. kebele 03 From
4 Yetemegn Tilahun
through Mergeta
Esayas, Wolela
Teshome , 1- 23-
12-
EneYalemwork Nov/20 Nov/20 30- 12-
k 11-Oct/202 April/2023 16-
Jibirile, Mulat 1.06 22 22 Nov/2022 Dec/2022
Menigesha , Tebikew m 7,310,237.39 April/202
Zinabu, Abate 3
Mekuaninit , Wodaji
Alemu through
Kebebush Alemu to
Kuasmeda
1.1. Kebele 04 From
5 Fogera Police Station
through Mitiku 25- 17-
23-
Zewdie House, Oct/202 Nov/20 30- 30- 02-
k 3-Oct/2022 Nov/2022
selesitu Atsedehitsanat 0.72 2 22 Nov/2022 Feb/2023
, Akinaw Hailu House
m 4,907,831.19 Mar/2023
through Mesikel
Adebabay to Main gate
of St Gebriel

155
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
Total Cost Bid
S/N Project U Qt EFY 2015 ( Closin Date Mobilizati Substanti
Bid g Contra Date on al Date of
nit y ETB)
Invitation Openin ct Contract AdvanceP Completio Asset
Date g Award Signature ayment n Registry
1.1. Kebele 04 From
6 Assefa Mesifin 23-
through Molla Jima , 25- 17-
3-Oct/2022 Nov/2022
Erisha Sebil , Worku k Oct/202 Nov/20 30- 30- 02-
0.79
Menigstie through m 5,437,924.65 2 22
Main gate of St Nov/2022 Feb/2023 Mar/2023
Gebrail to Setegn
Gobezie House
1.2 Gravel Road Earth
Work with Drainage k
1.41
m 5,444,628.92

1.2. Kebele 02 From Police

2 Station through
Ahimed Gashaw , 1-
AbiyZena, 23- 30- 12- 12- 16-
Nov/20
AssefaYibrie , k 11-Oct/202 Nov/20 Nov/2022 Dec/2022 May/2023 May/2023
1.41 22
Demelash shoes store, m 5,444,628.92 22
Emebet Adem woficho
, Tilku Mesigid
through Tadilo Siraj to
Delie Marew
Sub-total Movement 1.41
Network k 45,507,906.99
m

C Economic & Social

Services
1 MSE

156
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
Total Cost Bid
S/N Project U Qt EFY 2015 ( Closin Date Mobilizati Substanti
Bid g Contra Date on al Date of
nit y ETB)
Invitation Openin ct Contract AdvanceP Completio Asset
Date g Award Signature ayment n Registry
Facilities/Industrial
Zones
1.1 MSEs shade 1.00 3- 25- 17- 23- 30- 02-
N 1,090,909.08 Oct/2022 Oct/202 Nov/20 Nov/2022 Nov/2022 Mar/2023
o 30-
2 22
Feb/2023

Sub-total Economic 1.00

& Social Services 1,090,909.08
D Other
compensation
L 15,000,000.00
u
m
1 p
s
u
m

Sub-total Other
15,000,000.00
Total Pillar 6.
Integrated Urban
Infrastructure
Pillar 7:
Environmental,

157
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
Total Cost Bid
S/N Project U Qt EFY 2015 ( Closin Date Mobilizati Substanti
Bid g Contra Date on al Date of
nit y ETB)
Invitation Openin ct Contract AdvanceP Completio Asset
Date g Award Signature ayment n Registry
Green Services &
Recreation
Environmental
E
Service
1 Drainage
Kebele-01 From
back of sun rise
k
1.1 School to End of 0.12
m 747,333.48
Ephiphany Center to
Eriza River
2 Urban Greenery
Kebele 04 Youth 0.65
Center House H 2,300,000.00
Building with walk e
2.1 way. ct
a
r
e
Sub total
Environmental 3,047,333.48
Services
Total Pillar 7:
Environmental,
Green Services &
Recreation
Pillar 8: Resilient,
Inclusive and Safer

158
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
Total Cost Bid
S/N Project U Qt EFY 2015 ( Closin Date Mobilizati Substanti
Bid g Contra Date on al Date of
nit y ETB)
Invitation Openin ct Contract AdvanceP Completio Asset
Date g Award Signature ayment n Registry
Cities
Economic & Social
C
Services
Environmental
D
Services
E Other
Subtotal Other
Total Pillar 8:
Resilient, Inclusive
and Safer Cities
Municipal
Administration
Buildings and Other
Projects which
cannot be put in
Pillars
Total Municipal
Administration
Buildings and Other
Projects which
cannot be put in
Pillars
Consultancy
Services for designs
and contract
management/supervi
sion
159
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
Total Cost Bid
S/N Project U Qt EFY 2015 ( Closin Date Mobilizati Substanti
Bid g Contra Date on al Date of
nit y ETB)
Invitation Openin ct Contract AdvanceP Completio Asset
Date g Award Signature ayment n Registry
Total Consultancy
Services for designs
and contract
management/supervi
sion
Total CIP
64,646,149.55
Total Capacity
Building Plan (from
1,428,650.89
Table 19)
Grand Total
Expenditure (CIP + 66,074,800.44
CBP)
Total Income
66,074,800.44
Surplus/Deficit
(0.00)

11.2 Monthly Schedule of Maintenance Deficit Activities for the Year 2015

The AMP document is to expected monitor the maintenance deficit activities of the Ethiopian Fiscal Year 2014. Therefore, the
maintenance deficit of year 2015 is attached here in table below

160
 Table 147: Monthly Schedule of Maintenance Deficit Activities of the Year 2015
Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
S. Date
Description Of Activities Estimated Bid Date Mobilizatio Date of
No Uni Bid Closing Contract Substantial
Amount in Invitation Contract n Advance Asset
t Qty Opening Signatur Completion
A MOVEMENT NET WORK ETH. Birr Date Award Payment Registry
e
Maintenance of Gravel Road
1 Km 0.88
4,069,851.61
with Storm water drainage
Kebele 02 From kibrom Mengistu 30-
through oak tree, Asefa Baye , 11- 23- 12- 12- 16-
1-Nov/2022 Nov/202
Nitsuh Getachew, Ayalnesh Atalel Km Oct/202 Nov/2022 Dec/2022 May/2023 May/2023
1.1 0.88 4,069,851.61 2
, BizualemYekoye , Drainage
through Bizualem Yekoye to Haile
Tsega.
Sub total Movement Network 0.88 4,069,852
B ENVIRONMENTAL NET WORK
1 Urban Greneery
Maintenance of Youth Center 30- 16-
11- 23- 12- 12-
Greneery development 1-Nov/2022 Nov/202 April/202
hec Oct/202 Nov/2022 Dec/2022 April/2023
1.1 tar
0.65 2,537,628.43 2 3

Sub total Environmental Network 2,537,628.43

Total Maintenance 6,607,480.04

161
 Table 148: Implemented Schedule of All New works for 2014 EFY

Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation

S.N
Project Description Estimated Bid Bid Date Mobilizatio Date of
o. Date Contract Substantial
Unit Qty
Amount in Invitation Closing
Award
Contract nAdvance
Completion
Asset
ETH. Birr Date Opening Signature Payment Registry
A Movement Network
1 Roads
Gravel Road Earth work
1.1
with Drainage
kebele 01 From Sheh 18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
km 0.8 4,241,352.31 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
Amanie woficho to
Gohman KG , from
Negash Misikire to Ashem
1.1
Husein, from Adelahu
.1
Endiris woficho to
Wondai Gobie & from
Small Mesjid to Wale
Abidie
18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
1.1 Kebele 01 From Gohman km 0.7 4,030,162.52 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
.2 Kg to St.Georgis Birr
Kebele 02 From Mulugeta
Tamir to Fentahun Addis 18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
km 0.7 28,399,222.38 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
,from lisane Work to
1.1
Ertibie,from Wold Tensay
.3
to Gebrie Mitku and from
Eshet Gizaw to Seyifu Birr
Kibret
Kebele 02 From komander
18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
Dejen Worku to Derso km 0.9 4,458,419.50 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
1.1
Atanaw,from Bosie
.4
Bizualem to Muchit, from
Birr
Main Asphalt to Tachawt

162
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
S.N
Project Description Estimated Bid Bid Date Mobilizatio Date of
o. Date Contract Substantial
Unit Amount in Invitation Closing Contract nAdvance Asset
Qty Award Completion
ETH. Birr Date Opening Signature Payment Registry
shiferaw and from Yirdaw
Biazen to Mastewal
Eshetie.
Kebele 02 From Alemu 18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
km 0.8 6,974,355.64 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
1.1 Jember to Ourael Tsebel
.5 and from Main Asphalt to Birr
Ebabu Amere.
Kebele 03 From Nurit 18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
Awolu to Choma Abebe km 0.6 4,218,864.77 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
1.1 ,from Aniley Hailie to
.6 Endawok Gelaye. And
from Tewabe Getu to Birr
Aniley Hailie
kebele 03 From Yetemegn 18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
Tilahun to Mergeta km 1.1 4,094,167.48 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
Esayas, from Wolela
Teshome to Ene
Yalemwork Jibirile, from
1.1
Mulat Menigesha to
.7
Tebikew Zinabu,from Birr
Abate Mekuaninit to
Wodaji Alemu and from
Kebebush Alemu to Kuas
meda
Kebele 04 From Fogera
18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
Police Station to Mitiku km 0.7 3,216,196.31 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
1.1 Zewdie House, from
.8 selesitu Atsede hitsanat to
Akinaw Hailu House from Birr
Erisha Sebil to Woriku
163
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
S.N
Project Description Estimated Bid Bid Date Mobilizatio Date of
o. Date Contract Substantial
Unit Amount in Invitation Closing Contract nAdvance Asset
Qty Award Completion
ETH. Birr Date Opening Signature Payment Registry
Menigstie & from Mesikel
Adebabay to Main gate of
St Gebriel
Kebele 04 From Assefa
Mesifin to Molla Jima and 18- 22- 17- 20- 22-
km 0.8 3,941,980.09 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-De/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
17-May/2022
May/2022
from Erisha Sebil to
1.1
Woriku Menigstie and
.9
from Main gate of St
Gebrail to Setegn Gobezie Birr
House.
Total Gravel Road earth km 7 38,015,421.00
work Birr
Cobble Stone paving
1.2
work
Kebele 01 From Amsal km 0.5 4,035,949.64 1-Nov-21 2-Nov-21 18-Nov-21 25-Nov-21 29-Nov-21 27-Feb-22 28-Feb-22
1.2
Fentie to Geteneh Achenef
.1 Birr
and to Adugna Andargie.
Kebele 02 From Demelash
Shoes Store to Endalew km 0.7 4,776,961.75 27-Feb-22 28-Feb-22
1.2 Fenta,From Asmare 1-Nov-21 2-Nov-21 18-Nov-21 25-Nov-21 29-Nov-21
.2 Eshetie to Tegena Mesfin
and from E/Y Haregitu Birr
Belay to Meseret muche.
Kebele 04 From Photo 6,889,302.17 1-Nov-21 2-Nov-21 18-Nov-21 25-Nov-21 29-Nov-21 27-Feb-22 28-Feb-22
Tewodros to Abebeyitu km 0.8
1.2 Astatikie, From Asefa
.3 Tedla to Ayalew Zeleke
and from Anguach Birr
Gedamu to Seid Kibret.

164
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
S.N
Project Description Estimated Bid Bid Date Mobilizatio Date of
o. Date Contract Substantial
Unit Amount in Invitation Closing Contract nAdvance Asset
Qty Award Completion
ETH. Birr Date Opening Signature Payment Registry
Woreta Kebele 04 From km 0.7 4,669,636.11 1-Nov-21 2-Nov-21 18-Nov-21 25-Nov-21 29-Nov-21 27-Feb-22 28-Feb-22
Aminnet Mosa to Nurie
Kindie,FromYigardu to
1.2
Haji Ahemed Musa,From
.4 Birr
Haji Endris Seyid to Belay
Awoke and From Fente
Kindie to Nuru Suleman
Total Cobblestone km 2.8 20,371,849.67
paving Birr
Sub total Movement km 9.8 58,387,270.67
Network Birr
Economic & Social
C
Services
MSE Facilities/Industrial
1
Zones
30- 20- 22-
No 1 1,578,971.98 Dec/2021
3-Jan/2022 14-Jan/2022
Jan/2022
24-Jan/2022 20-Apri/2022
Apri/2022
1.1 MSESc shade
Birr
Sub total Economic & No 1 1,578,971.98
Social Services Birr
Pillar 7: Environmental,
Green Services &
Recreation
E Environmental Services
5.1 Urban Greenery
Kebele 01 & 04 Road 30- 2- 17- 21- 25-Mar-
5.1 km 0.8 735,916.07 Nov/2021 Nov/2021
10-Dec/2021
Dec/2021 Dec/2021
21-Mar-2022
2022
median grenery
.1 Birr
development with fence.

165
 Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
S.N
Project Description Estimated Bid Bid Date Mobilizatio Date of
o. Date Contract Substantial
Unit Amount in Invitation Closing Contract nAdvance Asset
Qty Award Completion
ETH. Birr Date Opening Signature Payment Registry
km 0.8 735,916.07
Greenery total
birr
subtotal environment
Consultancy and
6
Supervision
6.1 LDP Birr
Bridge Contract
6.2 Birr
Management
Total Consultancy and
birr
Supervision
7 Capacity Building birr
Total CIP birr -
Total CIP with Capacity
birr
Building 73,809,309.98

11.3 Monthly Schedule of Maintenance Deficit Activities for the Year 2014

The AMP document is to expected monitor the maintenance deficit activities of the Ethiopian Fiscal Year 2014. Therefore, the
maintenance deficit of year 2014 is attached here in table below.

166
 Table 149: Implemented maintenance schedule of 2014 E.C
Bid Evaluation Contract Implementation
S.
N Description Of Activities Estimated Bid Bid Date Date Mobilizatio Date of
Uni Substantial
o Amount in Invitation Closing Contract Contract n Advance Asset
t Qty Completion
ETH. Birr Date Opening Award Signature Payment Registry
A MOVEMENT NET WORK
1 Road
Maintainance of Cobble 0.2 4,350,000.00 30-
Km 10-Nov/2021 15-Nov/2021 27-Nov/2021 06-Dec/2022 08-Dec/2022 29-May/2022
Stone Road with drainage b/n 3 May/2022
kebele 01&02 From Photo
1. Fogera to Abebe Tsegaw and
1 maintenance of drainage from
St Georgis to Old Municipal
office.
Maintenance of Cobbel Stone 15 300,000.00 30-
1. m2 10-Nov/2021 15-Nov/2021 27-Nov/2021 06-Dec/2022 08-Dec/2022 29-Mar/2022
Road Paving to all four 0 Mar/2022
2 kebeles
Maintenance of Street light 1,480,931.00 30-Ap
1. Sodium to all for Kebeles
No 130 10-Nov/2021 15-Nov/2021 27-Nov/2021 06-Dec/2022 08-Dec/2022 29-Apr/2022
/2022
3
Sub total Movement 6,130,931
Network
ENVIRONMENTAL NET
B WORK
1 Massonary Drainage
Maintainance of dich cover for 0.6 1,250,000.00 30-
Km 10-Nov/2021 15-Nov/2021 27-Nov/2021 06-Dec/2022 08-Dec/2022 29-May/2022
kebele 01 from Coca Cola 3 May/2022
Stock point to Muchit Bitew
1.
and Maintenance of drainage
1 work in kebele 04 From
Gedilie Tasew to Asmare
Belay
Sub total Environmental 1,250,000.00
Network
Total Maintenance 7,380,931.00

167
11.4 Build a Schedule of Completed Activities against Target for New works in AMP Year-

The AMP is due for completion towards the end of the (Ethiopian Calendar) year. This means that
it is not possible to provide a complete analysis for the year in which the assessment of existing
assets is being carried out. To make the tracking process worthwhile, the analysis should begin by
focusing on the previous year, i.e. AMP year minus 2, where a full set of statistics should be
available. This provides the comparative analysis.

In table below, provide templates for measuring the performance of new works projects and
maintenance activities respectively. The table for maintenance is more comprehensive because it is
able to draw on activities completed in the year. In addition, this is the more important table for the
AMP since the maintenance performance is more directly associated with the AMP, whereas the
performance of new works project starts falls under the CIP.

Table 150: New works projects started against projects approved for AMP year-2

Strategic and No of
No of projects Cost of projects Cost of projects
Supportive projects
approved approved started
Activity Areas started
The Movement
14 49,758,035.00 14 47,434,411.69
Network
The Water Supply
0 0.00 0 0.00
Network
Environmental
1 2,667,397.98 1 2,587,096.72
Services
Social and
Economic 1 1,200,000.00 1 1,138,791.67
Services
Total 16 53,625,432.98 16 51,160,300.08

The AMP Unit of Wereta is expected to update in the year 2 of this AMP which in the year 2013
EFY for the projects that are planned in the Capital Investment Plan of the city. The Unit is also
expected to draw the percentage of total number of projects completed versus approved and
percentage of the total cost of projects completed versus approved.

168
Table 151: Maintenance projects started against projects approved for AMP year-2

Strategic and No of
No of projects Cost of projects Cost of projects
Supportive projects
approved approved started
Activity Areas started
The Movement
4 6,257,125.25 4 5,737,560.66
Network
The Water
0 0.00 0 0.00
Supply Network
Environmental
0 0.00 0 0.00
Services
Social and
Economic 0 0.00 0 0.00
Services
Total 4 6,257,125.25 4 5,737,560.66

169