Quezon City achieved a perfect accessibility score of 5, attributed to its proximity

to major gateways, expressways, easy access to Epifanio delos Santos Avenue (EDSA),
and the MRT line connection. Similarly, Makati City earned a flawless grade due to its
convenient location near EDSA and C-5, along with accessible buses and MRT stations.
While Taguig City is situated farther inland, making it comparatively more challenging to
reach, it remains close to key entry points.

Quezon City stands out for its diverse and abundant plant and seedling
businesses, earning it a top score of 5. As a green city, it meets the demands of plant
enthusiasts, promoting urban agriculture, and benefiting from its proximity to agricultural
areas. In contrast, Makati and Muntinlupa are gradually emerging as green cities, with a
focus on environmentally friendly practices, but they lag Quezon City in this aspect.

Makati serves as a thriving economic and business hub, hosting major

corporations in prime locations like Ayala, Fort Bonifacio, and Poblacion. It is not only a
business center but also a popular destination for families and visitors, offering large malls
and green parks. However, Quezon City, while competitive, lacks sufficient tourism
amenities.

Infrastructure plays a crucial role in site selection, and Quezon City excels with a
well-maintained road network, pedestrian lanes, footbridges, bike lanes, and spacious
sidewalks, earning it a perfect score of 5. Makati boasts Ayala projects but faces traffic
issues in certain areas due to inadequate junction planning. Taguig, while comparable to
Makati, is still under construction in some parts, resulting in a rating of 4 for infrastructure.

Population size correlates with crime rates, and Quezon City, being highly
populated, experiences a higher level of criminal activity. Taguig has seen a recent
increase in crime, but planned unit developments provide better security. Makati has a
lower crime rate, contributing to a higher grade in this aspect.

The market attractiveness of these cities has substantially increased, with Quezon
City thriving among investors and residents. Environmental concerns are vocalized in
Quezon City, which scores a 5 for its commitment to urban farming and food security.
Makati emphasizes commercial and economic expansion, while Taguig focuses on
upgrading environmental regulations but still has room for overall sustainability
improvement.

Quezon City's residents have shown interest in environmental and agricultural

projects, reflecting a rating of 5 for social approval. Makati and Taguig are also open to
these concepts, albeit with less enthusiasm due to their emphasis on commercial ventures
and leisure spaces. Based on the data, Quezon City emerges as the most suitable choice
for the project, given its excellent accessibility, economic viability, diverse market, and
strong commitment to environmental and agricultural initiatives.

/////
 Quezon City offers various prospective places for the project. The project's viability
was investigated in five city growth centers: the Central Business District (Knowledge
Community District), which includes universities and extends to the North and East
triangles of the business district; the Cubao Growth Center; the Batasan NGC Growth
Center; the Novaliches-Lagro Growth Center; and the Balintawak Munoz Growth Centre.
After assessing these growth hubs, it is clear that the Balintawak and Novaliches
sectors are largely focused on residential characteristics and are not viable places for an
agritourism complex. Batasan Growth Center places a larger emphasis on government
entities. The Central Business District and Cubao Growth Center are the best places for
the project since they are easily accessible via multiple modes of transportation and have
seamless links to other growth nodes and cities.
////

The weight was distributed based on its importance. The proximity to

transportation terminals was given a higher weight due to the nature of the project being a
tourism facility. The structure must be accessible to people coming from other parts of the
country: car drivers from nearby cities and provinces, buses and public utility vehicles for
commuters, and train lines coming from the airport. The size of the lot is given equal
importance due to the scale of the project and its requirements. The proximity to suppliers,
buyers, and users is important also because they will be the ones using the facility, but not
as high as the other factors because if the structure will be beneficial, major stakeholders
like suppliers and deliveries will be visiting the structure. Vertical heights of surrounding
buildings should also be considered but is not given a higher rate as the other factors due
to the usage of CEA which tests plants thriving in artificial environments. The site
orientation is also given a relatively lower weight because the project will still thrive even
with the experiential factors reduced.

The first and second site is found along EDSA which automatically grants them
access to public transportation terminals. The first site is near Centris Station (Quezon
Avenue) and the second one is near GMA-Kamuning Station (East Avenue). Public utility
vehicles also pass by these sites which makes it an ideal location. The third site is also
passed by public utility vehicles along the Elliptical road, and jeepneys congregate at the
National Housing Authority to drop off and pick up passengers; however, these are
informal terminals and may be subject to dispersal which gives it a relatively lower rating.

The lot size of first and third site gives them an advantage. These sites are larger
than 3-hectares which provides more space for landscaping and open spaces, as well as
road networks for trucks and deliveries. The second site, however, has a relatively smaller
size and an irregular shape which makes it more difficult to plan and design.

All the sites are near residential areas but the location of site one stands out from
the rest. The first site is found along EDSA which makes it easier for purchasers from the
Southern portion of Metro Manila to visit the structure; moreover, it is near major
commercial developments and residential areas ranging from low-income to high-income
class. The second site is also found along EDSA, giving it the same advantage but the
area is very dense with non-residential developments unlike in the first site where the
residential area is prominent. The third site is also near residential areas like the Teachers
Village and UP Bliss; moreover, the site is found along the Elliptical road which is easily
accessible by vehicles; moreover the Elliptical road can serve as a point of convergence
within Quezon City which makes the location of the site an ideal tourism spot.

Vertical structures are popping up one by one within Quezon City. The first site is
now being surrounded by tall structures including the Seda and Avida Towers within the
Vertis North and the cylindrical tower adjacent to the site. Although the presence of these
structures is considered as problems, the orientation of the site allows natural sunlight to
spread throughout the site. The second and third site don’t have tall structures that can
cast shadows or block views from the site which gives them a higher rating compared to
the first site.

The first site has its longer side facing the North-South axis which means
maximum sunlight can be achieved, as well as maximum shading. This is the ideal setup
for an agritourism facility which relies on sunlight for plant growth and shading for the
comfort of the users. The second site is a pointed corner lot which faces the South side
while its long side is facing the Southeastern side. The other side of the structure is filled
with buildings which may produce a lot of shadows, and the North side also contains a
structure (Landbank) and it doesn’t provide any noteworthy views with this setup, which
gives it a lower rating. The third site has its shorter side facing the North-South axis but the
orientation of the site gives it the most views which is complemented by its location near
residential areas and the Quezon City Memorial Circle.

Basing from the table above, placing the project on the first site option (Agham
Road cor. Quezon Avenue) would be the best option since it satisfies most of the
requirements needed for the project to be functioning. Although the other sites are usable
and will still provide other advantages over the chosen site, it might not be able to clearly
satisfy the needs of the project.

///

Analyzing the location in Alabang based on the provided criteria:

1. **Proximity to Transportation Terminals and Routes**:

- Alabang is well-connected in terms of transportation. It hosts the Alabang

Intermodal Transport Terminal, a major transportation hub in the southern part of Metro
Manila. This terminal serves as a convergence point for various modes of transportation
including buses, jeepneys, and vans, providing easy access to different parts of Metro
Manila and nearby provinces.
 2. **Size of Lot**:

- The specific size of the lot in the provided location is not explicitly mentioned,
but Alabang generally offers a variety of lot sizes suitable for different purposes, ranging
from small commercial lots to larger industrial plots.

3. **Proximity to Potential Consumers, Suppliers, and Users**:

- Alabang is a bustling commercial and residential area, home to various

businesses, residential developments, and commercial establishments. It hosts numerous
shopping malls, office buildings, restaurants, and residential communities. This proximity to
a diverse consumer base and potential business partners makes it an attractive location
for businesses.

4. **Vertical Heights of Surrounding Structures and Site Orientation**:

- The vertical heights of surrounding structures in Alabang vary depending on

the specific area. Generally, Alabang features a mix of low-rise commercial buildings, mid-
rise residential and office towers, and some high-rise developments. The site orientation
may impact factors such as sunlight exposure, views, and accessibility within the vicinity.

In summary, the location in Alabang appears to offer favorable conditions in terms

of transportation accessibility, proximity to potential consumers and suppliers, and a mix of
surrounding structures suitable for various business needs. However, specific
considerations such as lot size and orientation would require further assessment based on
the specific requirements of the business or development project.
//
Alabang, located in Muntinlupa City, is a thriving urban hub in the Philippines'
Greater Metro Manila region. A meso site study of this dynamic locale entails investigating
its geographical, economic, social, and infrastructural components in order to acquire a
thorough grasp of its features and possibilities.
Geographically, Alabang benefits from its advantageous location in Metro Manila's
southern region. It is accessible by major thoroughfares such as the South Luzon
Expressway (SLEX) and the Skyway, allowing for easy access to adjacent cities and
provinces. Its closeness to major corporate areas like as Makati and Bonifacio Global City
(BGC) increases its appeal as a commercial hub.
Alabang has a varied corporate environment, which includes international firms,
industrial parks, commercial organizations, and residential neighborhoods. The presence
of well-known enterprises and business process outsourcing (BPO) providers adds to its
reputation as a vibrant economic center. Furthermore, Alabang has a variety of shopping
and dining facilities, including malls such as Alabang Town Center and Festival Mall, which
cater to the requirements and tastes of both residents and visitors.
Socially, Alabang is a dynamic and cosmopolitan community that reflects the
cultural richness of Philippine culture. Its population is a mix of professionals, expats, and
locals, resulting in a diverse tapestry of cultures, languages, and lifestyles. Educational
institutions, healthcare facilities, and recreational amenities all contribute to the
community's overall quality of life and social cohesiveness.
In terms of infrastructure, Alabang has extensive transportation networks that
include public buses, jeepneys, and the Philippine National Railways (PNR) South
Commuter Line, allowing for travel inside and beyond the city. Furthermore, major
infrastructure projects, like as the projected Muntinlupa-Cavite Expressway (MCX), are
expected to improve connectivity and accessibility in the area. Alabang also has
contemporary utilities and services, such as telecommunications, utilities, and emergency
response systems, which ensures that everyday activities run smoothly and meet the
demands of its people and companies.