Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Endowment is the dedication or entrustment of property either for a religious purpose or for a
charitable purpose or for both religious and charitable purposes. Manu said, “Let him without
tiring always offer sacrifices (istha) and perform works (purta) with faith, for offerings and
charitable works made with faith and with lawfully earned money procure endless rewards. Let
him always practice according to his ability with a cheerful heart, the duty of liberality
(danaDharma), both by sacrifice (istha) and charitable works (purta) if he finds a worthy
recipient for his gifts.”
A Hindu, who is of sound mind and not a minor may dispose of his property by will or gift for
religious and charitable purposes. In Abdul Ali Molla v. Gopal Chandra Biswas 46 DLR 631, it
has been held that, “An endowment is the dedication of property by gift or will for some
religious and charitable purposes.” A religious endowment is the dedication of property (which
may be public or private) which has its object for the establishment, maintenance and worship of
an idol, deity or any other purpose, which is religious in nature, i.e.; performance of religious
ceremonies, such as, sraddha ceremony. Manu says, “Charity alone is the Supreme Dharma or
religious duty to be performed by a person for his spiritual benefit.” Property which is dedicated
for religious purposes is called Debutter property which means properties belonging to the deity.
A Hindu who is of sound mind and not a minor may dispose of his property by gift or by will for
religious and charitable purposes. Therefore, a person who may endow must have the following
characteristics.
a) Mental Soundness.
b) Age of maturity.
c) Right over the property.
a) Public endowment - When the endowment is made for the benefit of the public, then it is
called public endowment.
b) Private endowment - When the dedication of property is made for the benefit of a small
group of people or individual, then it is called private endowment.
The basic difference between a public and a private endowment is that, in case of a private
endowment, the beneficiaries are definite and ascertainable. On the other hand, in case of a
public endowment, the beneficial interest is vested in an uncertain and fluctuating body of
persons, either the public at large or some considerable portion of it, answering a particular
description.
Again, in a public endowment the heirs of the founder cannot put an end to the endowment. In
case of a private endowment, the agreement of the whole family may convert the Debutter
property into secular property. Property, which is dedicated for religious purposes, is called
Debutter property.
It is a question of fact, whether a Temple is a private one or public. Where property is set aside
for the worship of family God, in which the public are not interested, the endowment is a private
endowment.
The object or purpose of the endowment is an essential ingredient by which the difference
between public and private endowments can be made. In Venkatna Narsimha Rao v. Subba Rao
1923 46 MAD 300 it held that, “A trust either for spread of Sanskrit language or for the spread
of Hindu religion or both was void in law and unenforceable because the words were regarded as
to vague and uncertain to create an executable trust.”
The two most important and popular form of religious endowments is as follows.
a) The Idol or the Temple or the Devasthanam.
b) The Math.
The Math and the Temple represents the two paths of spiritualism. The Math represents the path
of knowledge while the Temple represents the path of devotion. These two are important as they
indicate the two ways for the salvation of human soul.
Math
Math is a monastery, the main purpose of which is the spread of religious knowledge mainly
through instruction to disciples and followers. Math is an institution of a monastic nature. It is a
center for religious and philosophical instruction of a particular section or culture of Hindu law.
The object of instituting a Math is to study and propagate the religious and philosophical tenets
of the school or section and also to maintain a line of Gurus or teachers.
The idol is the path of devotion. Devasthanam or Temple is dedication of property for the
worship of an Idol personifying God. We can say that, the dedication of property is made for the
establishment of an Idol. Idol is considered as a legal person. When a non-human person is
considered as a person, then it is called a legal person. Images which are worshipped by the
Hindus are visible symbols which represent one or another attributes of the God. Image
personifies the deity and the object of worship is not the image but the God personified by it.
The idol is an example of a non- human legal personality under Hindu law. As a legal person, it
can own property and the Temple is the property of the Idol. The rent of the property dedicated to
the Idol. Also all offering belongs to the Idol and not to the Shebait. An idol is therefore a juristic
person who is capable of holding property. However, it may be said that, the Idol has no
beneficial interest in the endowment. The only beneficiaries are the worshippers. The real
purpose of a gift of properties to an Idol is not to confer any benefit on God, but acquisition of
spiritual benefit, by providing opportunities and facilities, for those who desire worship. It is
therefore said only in an ideal sense that, the Idol is the owner of the endowed property.
Shebait
Temple or Mandir or Devasthanan is the place of residence and worship of the Idol. The manager
of the Temple is called the Shebait. Therefore, Shebait means a person who is in charge of a
Temple or Mandir or Devasthanan.
The legal position of a Shebait is difficult to define precisely. It is settled that, the relationship of
the Shebait and the Debutter property is not that of a trustee. His position is that of a trustee with
regard to the property, but as regard the services to the Temple and the duty imposed upon him,
he is in a position of dignity. The property of the Temple is under his administration and he is the
manager of the Temple. He is also the agent through which the Idol operates.
The general rule is that, the property given for religious worship is inalienable. However, in
certain cases i.e. legal necessity, such property may be alienable.In the case of Hunooman
Persaid v. Mosammat Babooee 1856 MIA 393 it has been held that “The power of the manager
of an infant heir to charge an estate is not his own. Under Hindu law, it is a limited and qualified
power. It can only exercise rightly, in case of need or for the benefit of the estate”. The same will
apply in case of a Debutter property. In the case of Abdul Ali Molla v. Chand Biswas 46 DLR
63, it has been held that, “A Debutter property being the abode of deities is inalienable except for
legal necessity.
Shebait can alienate Debutter property for the need or for the benefit of the Idol. Legal necessity
of the Idol refers to those purposes without which the very object of the endowment would be
frustrated or without which the existence of the endowment will be endangered. In Channu Mia
v. Maindra Lal Roy 7 BLD (AD) 64 it has been held that, “Alienation by Shebait was not done
for legal necessity of the deity and as such the settlement was rightly found to be bad in law.”