Sted Construction Institute SX Ta PUB 083, shot Pot 25 ‘A Tae ~ Design of Composite Trusses Swed Pad Mot Ba SO" Appendix A: Design Example Tigemenasd | Pee simi Beam Fecfonen sve DM May 92 Sea Tas CALCULATION SHEET RML June 92 ‘Aid Capacity Compression In the construction sage it is assumed that the steel decking will provide adequate lateral restraint to the compression flange of the tee section. Therefore check buckling of the tee section about the major (x-x) axis. Note: Ifthe decking runs perallel to the top chord assume no restraint is provided. Consider a) central panel (A-A) ») panel (B-B) The effective length, Lz taken as 0.851. for both cases 0.85 x 1500 = IS x 2400 = 275 mm 2040 mm 1.5m panel A-A .4 m panel B-B Ll, = LL = Le (as s9s0: Pant 1 -C147.3.1) a o- AGA) = 1275162 = 7.00 DB) = 2080/46.2 = 44.16 JSrom Table 27(c) using p, = 296 N/mm? (reduced strength) pe (AA) = 281 N/m? D, (B-B) = 247 N/mm? Axial capacity = = AG X Pex P, (Ara) = 266% 2110 = ATEN F (BB) = 166x270 =~ OSTENae Design of Composite Trusses The "PUB 083, sma 11425 | 2 caunuion EE fore Saoot Pa ta dis A: Design Ecample ute SES TON ‘Telephone (0344) 23365, Mads by Pax (0044) 22844 emer CALCULATION SHEET ” RM. June 2 Combined stresses for load cases Load Cases Overall buckling check Cases 142 Pand (AA) = 0.863 < 1.0 0K Cases 1+ 3 398.2 Panel (A-A) aT < 100K au, Pand (B-B) “Te = 0.87 < 1.00K Cases 1+ 4 3802 , 3.0 Pand (A-A) a = 0.074 < 1.0 OK Cases 1+ 5 239 , 656 Pand (B-B) G7 * 14.65 = 0.865 < 1.0 OK Notes: Do AgPy = 26.6 X10 x 29610 = 787.4 KN 2 My = ge members considered as restrained m= = ‘1.0 (conservatively assumed because m factor is not readily determined for moment variation along T section) fe 200_||, 240 br xia Tr {oma a Mid panel‘The Institute 2 Sood Park Aust Bra LS TON ear Steel Construction PUB 083, shoot 18. 25 A Design of Composite Trusses Appendix A: Design Example ‘Telphose (04) 20345 ore Male by por Foxtons) 2904 ao May 92 CALCULATION SHEET ” RML June 92 Truss dimensions taken on stel centre lines ankw win aN aN ae _ |e : ! 7200 2400 | 2400 750. con eae Sections: meng RIESE? Verticals ~ 50x 50x 5L } sont et 11.4 kN/m? x 3 = (34.2 kN/m Length of diagonal (from nodes) = (690.6 + 1200) = — 1385 mm Major bracing forces used to design the lattice girder Member Force (kN) 1s (232 ~ 41) 1385/6906 = 25 - 47 383 AN Tension 383 kN Compression 47 kN Compressionstan Design of Composite Trusses. sa m= vo [one Tears [a 3, camtcen REE [ar sat Svaod Fa Att Bets 8L3 708 Appendix A: Design Bs Figherqeayons aa Taree ‘ Facto sa9ce pum | _ May 92 CRT a CALCULATION SHEET RML. ‘une $2 29, where Nz = 5 = 59 = 3745 kN 36.5 mm Hence, moment resistance due to composite action at opening (see calculation sheet 15) is: S45 [130 + eoyi2 + 38.5) 1? = 50.0 kNm Botom chont value of T 141.8 IN, 44 x 13.5 x 3 = 17R2EN 108.4 asa (Hel BAL 195.5 kw Postion considered 124-5 LN Jor moment Moment = = — 124.3. x 6 ~ 6/13. x 178.2 x $ = 509.4 kNm Axial bottom chord force = — 5094 0.848 = 600.7 kN T= 600.7kN Total moment resistance due to Vierendeel bending is: M, = My +2MyU-TAp) + 2M, = sov2xis.7 [1 - 07) o2 x 465 1047.3 = 92.0 km > 53.1 kim OK Vierendeel panel is satisfactory for out of balance imposed loadsTension any Compression Nome” tain) awe 18 St weit oad on (as 1) ae f ee 07 gos 9 ge a2e to wot n so ans 207 +140. t f a 103 ag ? Gua as saith . 1301 _sa7a__190 sige) __s174_ -fer, 2 fa sete, vib o¢ ater da ee Figure 21 Unbalanced imposed load (Cases 3 & 5). Moments and forces around central opening‘The Zee | Pus 083 shoe 120425 | “A Steel Construction SSS [7 or Composite Trusses Instat Se EM teen of Compost 7 ‘Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 70N- an Appendix. A: Design Example Poesy * pum | stay 92 CALCULATION SHEET a ae Erection Stage 4. 3 AN Aasuned nde pséon ww fotiing 1 a For the purposes of this example assume lifting angle = 30° Self weight of ginter = 0.22 kN/m?* Factored load = = 0.22. 138 3 KLE = tain 43 Compresive chortfore = Hx P= Baw Bending effects (assume UDL between lifting nodes) Compressive chord force = = 25iN <. maximum chord force D4A+ 225 34.9 kN Top chord section ~ 127 x 152 x 21 ke/m T section Grade 50 Note: section classification is ‘slender’ = 270mm, Area = 26.6 en? 8700 2 aos = ma = 296 Nim 0 Pn Bey = 18.0 Nira? R= 66x 1 = a7 9KN> 24940 OK + Check weight of girder when the design has been finalised (see Sheet 21).The rar "PUB 083 show 130125 | A Stel Consirution EM” [FD compte tases Institute Db ae ee oh Compose Sitonod a Ascot Ranke SLE71QN Appendix A: Design Example Foam aes aaa Maaeby ta Earn ren pun | ate 2 CALCULATION SHEET ML |" June 92 Composite Truss Loading Nim Girder, concrete & deck etc. 2.30 cas 0.35 Raised Floor 0.50 BIS x14 = 4.4 kN? Imposed = G35 + 1.0) 435 x16 2 1.4 kNim? WH U4 x BS x3 = ATEN SoS} Max Bending Moment = 461.7 x 4s = 779.1 kNm 3000 x= 22. f= 385 I == 203) 600.6The "pup 083 shen 20025 | A Steel Construction Te istete Se | Dusen of Componte Truses Silwood Pask Atcot Berks SLS 70N Appendis A: Design Example x ota ia a ae Soot out | ay CALCULATION SHEET vee ML |" June 92 Member 135 (Diagonal) ‘Axlal Teusile force = 381 kN For 80 x 80 x 8L Grade 50 coatcamns = nen [yl Assume angle welded to the T-section 4 = (>-s] 0 -[#- = 608 mn? Gross arca of unconnected leg = -f)n = gs = 2 a [> 3]! {» S)8 608 mn 3x 608 OS + OS | 08 = an| (08 + 456 1068 mm? », 1068 x 35510 STTTRN > 190.5 kN For pracitcal reasons use 2 No. 80 x 80 x 8 L for all tension and compression members except the vertical braces Weight Schedule Descrpton | Seaion | Weigle | Number | Lengh | Tot | Weigh mm mm | gi me | Length 1s Tpetort [urxizt | a | 2 | 133 | us| 205 Botom chord |16sx1527 | 23 | 1 | ae | me | 3668 Bracing Diagonsts | 30x89x81) 9639 | 20 | 139| 2728 | 267.7 Vericas | s0xsoxst| 377 | 4 | o69| “276| “me Weight perm? ma 207, 9.1 iyNO MNT TOLL < MNY 898 or9'0 = exer Lg OI Ze ~ 6°08 - OFT + O92) x ELEOT ww 2°72 (OU * * ODE x SE x SFO = "WW ‘Syoodvo muswopy sup age Fueor °x “easouon wy yndap sexo yanmen NY ovsse eur = x £68 ae = 4 *y ‘sounssau pony *e seep pee: “fsO 4y goupysisas 21210009 “suoyeinayoo Suppuaq Msai0 ui porasou 51 (Lp uomes 925) proyo dor ays toys Kpparrousasuod pauansso $1 if Supuag 104940 ssnay ansoawog 7 bun TAT on | sa prcoeg OW vg | WT eso alae wie apuaT TASHA BRO Jo WIRE = Saw rarer $80 ad on €or TaaHs NOLVINOWS race Crone svece oreo, SPA ONY 3d Poon armiasuy SS wnnsun9 pas ou,Tere. ter The PUB 083 sr 200.25 | A ‘Steel Construction OT Steel Co wre Design of Composite Taser, Sivoo Pk Ascut Beta sts Qs | Appendix A: Design Bx reese "DIM. Bay 92. Tea CALCULATION SHEET me ewe | June 92 Member 4-2 (vertical) Asal Compressive Force = 47kN Length to node points = 690 mm ‘Tr S0 x $0 x SL Grade $0 tw = 9.73 mm bed +0 2 29 < 20.2 OK fa ty = ISL mam + Seetion not slender Ara = 48en7 0.85 x 690 = 00.3; » OT 4 » Lex = 45.7; 15.1 0.85 x 60 07 x 690 485 x 0 = 33.8, 97x a » 151 1° using d = 64.5, from Table 27(c) of BS 5980 Pant P, = — 233 N/mm? Pe = 233K 4.80 = ILBKN> 72 SEN Use 2 No, $0 x 50 x § L Grade 50The rar | pun 083 sien 250025 [A Pxcmanin © ‘Sitwood Pak Ascot Berks SL3 7Ht Appendix A: Design Example sain rate rnd se am Fax (0344) 22944 oma ag — a CALCULATION SHEET " RML June 92 Natural Frequency Loading considered Dead + 10% Imposed (not including partitions) BIS + 10% of (4.35 - 1.0) BIS + 0.34 = 3.49 kN/m? Woe see nsKs = nay Deflection due to self weight - 5 x 1413 x 135007 384 x 205 x 167188+ x 10° 13.2 mm 18 3.2 = S0H,>4.0H, OK Frequency = “+ Floor structure satisfactory for natural frequency * For natural frequency the second moment of area could be increased by 10% to take account of the increased dynamic stiffness of the composite beam.The yarar | PUB O88 soon 160125 [A st Contrsion EL | pos of Compote Tae Sitwood Pak Ane Bes $18 708 ‘Appendix A: Design Example shone 34 ie Ne tam Faunpepe put May 92 CALCULATION SHEET eS ea | June 92 Therefore, R, is the smaller of Ny Oy OF A, Py where: etka avenge of each shear connecior f, ts the number of shear connectors over the opening ‘Shear stud design Studs 19 dia x 95 long LW concrete Grade 35 104 kN from Table 5 BS 5950: Part 3 104x009 = —93.6kN Q , (using LWC) 0, = 96X08 = 749KN Stud Laxout Deck trough centres 300 mam Slab depth, D, 130 mm ‘Max. spacing 4 x 130 = 520mm < 600 mm Ss max spacing = = “520. mm As deck trough centres are at 300 mm limit stud positions to 1 per trough 300 1500 Vierd. panel 7s0,| 750, ‘Maximum force in the bottom chord = 1047.25 AN Required Noopsnts = 18725 = 149-< 21 spp Between support and end af opening Although 14 studs would be adequate, 21 studs are required due to the requirements of| stud spacing‘Member Properties (see Figure 9) (om?) A, (em!) ‘I, (en) 1 Bottom chord 165 x 152 x 23kgim 20.8 10s sai Tee section 2 Bracing 60 % 60% 10 kg/m 22 12.0 8 double angle 3 Bracing 60 x 60 x 6 kg/m Bs 12 456 double angle 4 Verticals 50 x 50 x 6 kg/m Try 60 256 ‘double angle 5 Shear links (concrete units) 3600 3600 43200 6 Sib (concrete units) 2100 210 rs 7 Topehord = 127 x 152 x 21kgim 26.6 123 568 Tee section Elastic modulus of steel, Elastic modulus of concrete ‘The centroid ofthe slab is taken as 90 mm above the top flange of the bear. The shear links are spaced at 600 mam (except in the Vierendeel panel) and therefore include the action of a namber of ribs. The slab and shear link properties set to zero in non-compesite cares ‘A = cross-sectional area; A, = shear area; [, = second moment of area for major axis bending ‘The results of the important load cases are presented in Figures 19 10 21. It cam be seen that the ‘momeats in the members are relatively small except In the top chord in the composke ease. The unbalanced load case shows the magnitude of the moments and forces in the chords around the Vierendesl opening.The awe | PUB OSS snex 100825 [A Steel Construction SSS | pesign of Composite Trusses Institute a Sitwood Pak Asst Berks SLS7QN ceog —Abpendix A: Design Example ane rit | ey aaa — CALCULATION SHEET PML June 92 Shear Capacity (BS 5980: Part 1 Cl. 4. P, = 06 pA, where: py 296 Nina? A = Aad es 8588 ~T00 = 0.6.x 296 x 12:26 70 = U28kN Check for influence of shear on moment capacity 0.6 P, 0.6 x 217.8 130.7 KN "(actual vertical shear not likely to exceed 130.7 KN, s0 20 influence on moment capacity) Moment Capacity (BS 5950: Part 1 Cl. 4.2.5) Ma = Py (reduced) x Z, Ma, (Flange) = 26x 17/10" = BS KN Me (Toe) = 296% 49.510! = 14.65. kN