Hooks For Persuasive Essays

Crafting an essay on the subject of "Hooks for Persuasive Essays" can be both challenging and
rewarding. The difficulty lies in the intricate balance between creativity and precision required to
captivate the reader from the very beginning. The introduction, often considered the make-or-break
section of an essay, demands a hook that not only grabs attention but also sets the tone for the entire
persuasive piece.

Choosing the right hook involves a thorough understanding of the audience, the topic, and the
desired persuasive effect. It requires a keen sense of creativity to come up with a unique and
compelling opening that stands out amidst the vast sea of essays. Moreover, the challenge intensifies
as the hook should seamlessly lead into the thesis statement, creating a smooth transition between
engagement and argumentation.

Additionally, the difficulty lies in avoiding clichés or overused hooks that may diminish the essay's
impact. Striking the right balance between being original and relatable can be a delicate task. It
involves careful consideration of the specific audience's interests and preferences while avoiding the
risk of alienating or patronizing them.

Furthermore, the challenge extends to maintaining the persuasive momentum throughout the essay. A
well-crafted hook should not be a standalone element but rather part of a cohesive and compelling
narrative. Ensuring that the persuasive thread continues to weave seamlessly through the body of the
essay requires strategic planning and effective execution.

In conclusion, writing an essay on the topic of "Hooks for Persuasive Essays" is no easy feat. It
demands a combination of creativity, precision, and an in-depth understanding of the art of
persuasion. However, mastering this skill can be immensely rewarding, as it empowers the writer to
not only capture the reader's attention but also to effectively convey a persuasive message.
Remember, the key lies in the delicate dance between engaging the audience and substantiating your
argument.

If you find yourself struggling with such essays or need assistance with various writing tasks,
remember that similar essays and much more can be ordered on HelpWriting.net , where
professional writers are ready to help you navigate the complexities of persuasive writing.
Hooks For Persuasive Essays Hooks For Persuasive Essays
 Stakeholder vs Stockholder Theory
Larry Chapman Business Ethics Exam Two The Stakeholder theory of a firm is made up
into equal percentages on a pie chart, which is made up of Financials, Suppliers,
Employees, Customers and Communities. The Stockholder theory of a firm is made up
by a pyramid structure consisting of Labor, Management, CEO, Board and Stockholders.
I believe the Stakeholder theory is less ethical than the stockholder theory in terms of
Libertarianism and Egoism. Libertarianism view points are that there is no direct harm,
not infringing on rights, not breaking the laws, government protection only, free market
and charity. The Egoism viewpoint is to maximize long term self interest. The
Stakeholder Theory is less ethical from the Libertarianism... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
So far everyone has the same common goal and for one to achieve their own goal they
must help the other to achieve their goal. The main driver force of a company is the
labor, which everything starts with them and flows into the shareholders. The
Stockholder Theory is more ethical than the Stakeholders Theory, because it must take
a team and from the Utilitarianism viewpoint this creates greatest happiness due to
everyone achieving their goal to help others make their goal, which creates the
greatest happiness. In terms of a Libertarianism view on sexual harassment there is no
direct harm, because what is harm? Is harm just emotions or actual harm as in dying?
Sexual harassment has no direct harm in regards of the person that is harassed will
still be here after the harassment and not dead. It also does not infringe on rights,
because we have the freedom of speech and a lot of harassment is characterized as
comments. Also there are no rights stated that sexual harassment is legal or not legal.
Sexual Harassment does not break the law, as in there is not a law for sexual
harassment. A lot of people see it as unmoral and unethical, but still it does not break the
law. There is no such thing as in government protection in sexual harassment, because no
laws or rights are stated. The free market and charity does pertain to the sexual
harassment. I believe Sexual Harassment does not exist in a Libertarianism view.
Marketing is bad in terms of Deontology due to it
 Essay Financial Analysis for Fedex Corporation
Financial Analysis for FedEx Corporation

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The modern air/ground express industry was pioneered with the founding of Federal
Express in 1971; the corporation was created in 1998 as FDX Corporation and became
FedEx Corporation in January 2000 (FedEx, 2013).
FedEx provides customers and businesses worldwide with a broad portfolio of
transportation, e commerce and business services, offering integrated business
applications through operating companies competing collectively and managed
collaboratively, under the respected FedEx brand. FedEx inspires its more than 290,000
employees to remain absolutely, positively focused on safety, the highest ethical and
professional standards and the needs of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
RECOMMENDATIONS AND JUSTIFICATIONS

RECOMMENDATION#1: Should the firm increase their capital expenditures to increase

competitiveness? This will almost always be true but what segments of the business get
the most capital allocated to them and why?
Yes, by increasing competitiveness FedEx would increase revenue and reduce cost
through tighter integration and consolidation, improve/increase productivity, and reduce
capital expenditures. New capital expenditures would help the company make additional
revenue (Collins, 2010).
RECOMMENDATION #2: Should the firm increase growth by acquiring other
companies for synergies or grow internally? Do they have the infrastructure to grow
internally? If they by a competitor, how will the merger be integrated in regards to
culture, overlapping businesses, etc.
FedEx should increase growth internally. FedEx should invest in growth in a number of
ways: people/training (customer service), capital (facilities and equipment upgrades), and
advertising (product and services). Internal growth will inevitably cost money in the short
term, but the returns on these investments should outweigh the money spent over time.
The business size will not necessarily increase because of internal growth, but the
quality of the business will. As the US economy recovers in the coming years,
consumers and small businesses will once again require more of the services that FedEx
 Australian Informal Language Analysis
As Australians we have a propensity to bend and break rules of standard language so it
is more playful and reflective of our boisterous national identity. In doing so, language
can gain the power to shock, offend and threaten social harmony. To an extent, this is
prevalent in Australian Informal language however, it is important to recognise how
informal languagecan promote solidarity. Through the use of morphology, lexicology,
syntax and semantics informal language can be used to educate and inform other about
taboo topics, emphasise the purpose of life and to remind Australians about road safety.
Recently, Katie Duncan, a 25 year old Melbournian has hit to Facebook to remind her
fellow Australian females the importance of getting a pap smear. Her use of
euphemisms and word play have contributed to the vernacular of her post, becoming a
major factor for its going viral. Duncan s use of euphemisms such as lady garden and
her play on words like I m about to cervix you all some health chat realness... all help
create a witty sense of humour around the sensitive topic, helping strengthen social
bonds and harmony as well as emphasising social niceties. Duncans s post also contains
expletives such as c*nt*, however the context in which it is used, it s almost comical to
the point of being blasé as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During an official meeting on the 6th of February, Donnellan make a comment directed
at the Corangamite Shire Mayor, Jo Beard, saying the government funding in her region
was better than a kick in the dick . As a result of this comment, Donnellan has created a
dent in social harmony, particularly between himself and Jo Beard by threatening her
face needs as fuelled by the taboo language and expletives used in the comment, such as
dick, as well as the negative connotations that run alongside the
 Powers Of Monarch
The article The Powers of Monarch in England was about the state of the monarchy is
the highest thing on earth. There are three main ideas about the state of Monarchy,
which are delivering the Word of God, establishments of policy and philosophy. Kings
were treated as gods and even in the scriptures were referred to as gods. The reason
kings were called and treated as if they were god is that they exercise their power upon
the place they were ruled by deciding on major actions. For example, kings could decide
on anything like sentencing someone to death, creating or destroy anything, being a
judge, and anything godlike at the king s desire. The article goes on and talks about how
the succession of the king could be changed at the king s request. Therefore, if the king
thought his oldest son was not fit enough for the throne the king would give his
inheritance to the youngest instead. The kings used their judgment on anything they
thought was more convenient for themselves than others. This article explains that the
king s power derives from God. This is because the king decides on everything and is
considered godlike.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The House of Parliament, also known as the House of Commons decide on things that
the king requests. In the article, it talks about giving political power to Parliament,
instead of the king. It also talks about people s rights, privileges, liberties and it cannot
be taken. In addition, that people own their land and goods, not the king. The
Parliament discusses that the elected officials vote on issues together, and the king
cannot give laws or orders in politics. This article explains that Parliament power
derives from the people and not one person can have power and control. They are
given these privileges and liberties as part of their rights as citizens of their land. These
privileges and liberties cannot be taken away because it is a citizen s natural