Political Argumentative Essay Topics

Crafting an essay on the subject of "Political Argumentative Essay Topics" can be a challenging
endeavor that requires a careful balance of research, critical thinking, and persuasive writing. The
difficulty lies in navigating the intricate landscape of political issues, selecting a compelling topic,
and presenting a well-structured argument that engages readers.

Firstly, the sheer breadth of political topics available for exploration can be overwhelming. From
global geopolitics to domestic policy issues, the range is vast, making the selection of a specific topic
a daunting task. It requires a thorough understanding of current events, political theory, and the
ability to identify issues that are both relevant and thought-provoking.

Furthermore, delving into political arguments demands meticulous research. It is essential to gather
information from credible sources, analyze various perspectives, and synthesize complex ideas into a
coherent narrative. The ever-changing nature of politics adds an additional layer of challenge, as
staying up-to-date with the latest developments is crucial for crafting an informed and relevant
argument.

Additionally, the task involves the skillful use of rhetoric and persuasion. The essay must not only
present a well-reasoned argument but also anticipate counterarguments and effectively address them.
The writer must navigate the delicate balance between passion and objectivity, avoiding biased
language while still conveying a compelling stance.

Moreover, political topics often evoke strong emotions and diverse opinions. Writing an
argumentative essay in this context requires diplomatic handling of differing viewpoints,
acknowledging nuances, and maintaining a respectful tone. Striking this balance is vital to ensure the
essay remains persuasive rather than alienating potential readers.

In conclusion, composing a political argumentative essay demands a blend of research prowess,

critical thinking, and persuasive writing skills. It involves navigating the complexities of political
issues, staying abreast of current events, and addressing diverse perspectives with finesse. While
challenging, the process can be immensely rewarding, as it provides an opportunity to engage with
crucial societal issues. If you find yourself struggling with such tasks, remember that assistance is
available, and similar essays, along with other academic content, can be ordered on HelpWriting.net
.
Political Argumentative Essay TopicsPolitical Argumentative Essay Topics
The Democratic Accountability Of The European Union Essay
In this assignment I will be assessing the democratic accountability of the European
Union. I will begin by briefly describing the institutions, their functions, compositions
and discuss how they work as check and balance system to ensure democratic
accountability further to look on to how laws are made and what they are In order to
establish whether or not the EU is in fact answerable to its citizens.
The 4 main institutions in the EU are; The EU parliament, the Council of Ministers, the
European council and the Commission.
The Commission is an independent body. Its powers are found in Article 17 on the
Treaty on the European Union. Each member state has 1 commissioner; this was a
consequence of the Lisbon Treaty.
The president of the commission allocates each commissioner with a portfolio that
oversees areas such as fisheries, environment, and trade. General Commissioners are
suggested by member states and elected by president elect from the Council and
parliament. Commission president is nominated by qualified majority vote of the
European council, and is then elected by the European Parliament by majority vote if this
candidate doesn t get the required amount of majority votes the council will propose
another within four weeks.
It could be argued that there is too much discretion in the powers of the president in that
he/she can literally decide which commissioner gets which portfolio this could be out of
personal preference.
The Commission is sometimes referred to
 Power In The Scarlet Ibis
The only difference between a hero and the villain is that the villain chooses to use that
power in a way that is selfish and hurts other people (Chadwick Boseman). In Hurst s
The Scarlet Ibis, the narrator chooses to use his power in a way that hurts his invalid
brother, Doodle. While living in a time period where different is improper, the narrator
cannot mentally handle the fact that Doodle is different from others. Being the older
sibling, the narrator takes on the responsibility to help Doodle become ordinary. He
teaches Doodle to walk, run, climb, and swim, because he is ashamed of having a
brother with disabilities. As a result, the narrator serves as a villain by forcing his invalid
brother, Doodle, past his limitations, which ultimately causes the... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Older siblings feel obligated to take authority over their younger siblings. The narrator
took the responsibility of teaching Doodle to develop into an ordinary boy; however, he
supports Doodle out of selfishness. With this in mind, the narrator changes Doodle s
name from William Armstrong to Doodle because he believes Doodle is not strong
enough to have that name. He believes William Armstrong only sounds good only on a
tombstone, (595) so changing Doodle s name was the kindest thing he could have
done. Likewise, the narrator selfishly disobeys the doctor s list of don ts for Doodle
because he doesn t agree with Doodle s limitations. In fact, the narrator hauls Doodle
carelessly around cotton fields and whips him around corners on two wheels of the go
cart. As a result, the narrator decides to take the next step in teaching Doodle. As school
approaches, Doodle falls behind on learning to run, swim, and climb. Therefore, the
narrator decides to double his efforts and push Doodle even harder. I made him swim
until he turned blue and row until he couldn t lift an oar. Wherever we
 Foucault
Foucault s theorisation of the power/knowledge relationship

Foucault in theorizing the relationship between power and knowledge basically focused
on how power operated in the institutions and in its techniques. The point is how power
was supported by knowledge in the functioning of institutions of punishment. He places
the body at the centre of the struggles between different formations of power/knowledge.
The techniques of regulation are applied to the body (Wheterell et al., 2001: 78)
Power is the ability to control others or one s entity. Accordingly it can be defined as a
kind of strength or as an authority. There are various theorisations about the meaning of
this term in sociology thus it would be hard to give a comprehensive ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
When plague turned up the old system followed the then methods of observation and
surveillance, plague was everywhere thus the supporting power must have been
mobilized. In this case power is mobilized; it makes itself everywhere present and
visible; it invents new mechanism; it separates; it immobilizes etc. to make people act as
it was expected in these conditions (because of the plague almost every interactions must
have been stopped in the interest of getting rid of the disease). (Foucault, 1975) The
Panopticon instead of exercising power from several sides emphasises the importance
and perfection of the surveillance focus from one place.
The Panopticon is a building which has an annual part in the periphery and a tower in the
centre. Next to omitting little details its most important feature is the ability to see into
every cells without being visible. The panoptic mechanism arranges spatial unities that
make it possible to see constantly and to recognize immediately. (Calhoun et al., 2007:
209) The consciousness of being watched make people put on their best behaviour, their
best way of acting thus the inmates do not commit any further crimes as it usually occurs
that could happen without being watched.
The operation of this building gives the