Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.
Introduction:
One of the serious concerns of the leaders of countries is the energy and water
production and consumption.[1] Most of the developing countries has been faced with
the problem of energy security as the fossil fuels are depleting and also they release
carbon dioxide to the environment. Another serious concern of the world is the lack of
water and environmental pollution due to high load of untreated pollution and
specially wastewater generated by industries which were discharged to the
environment [2, 3]. To find out a solution for these problems, replacing this kind of
fuels with a cleaner and sustainable fuels and also finding a system for waste
management specially as it contains variety of toxic and heavy metals become more
attractive subject for the scientists[4].
Lots of efforts have been spent on higher efficiency waste waterwastewater treatment
and also renewable and clean energy production but most of them had the lack of
efficiency or they were not economical viable. Also some of them used some
techniques which produces greenhouse gasses that had the same issue as fossil fuels
[5, 6].
1
Microbial fuel cells become more attractive that it has no such problems. In this
technique, the chemical energy of organic substances (which pollute the environment)
will be converted to a clean energy (electricity). In fact, MFC uses the metabolism of
organic materials in the wastewater to produce energy [7, 8].
Researchers in this study, tried to optimize microbial full cell, by machine learning.
…………………………………………………………….
AI (artificial intelligence) and ML (machine learning) tools have been tackling several
engineering. Specifically, the AI methods can effectively handle several kinds of data,
including uncertainty or complexity nature [11]. In this article, machine learning
methods are used for data analysis.
At the very fundamental level machine learning (ML) is a category of artificial
intelligence that enables computers to think and learn on their own. It is all about
making computers modify their actions in order to improve the actions to attain more
accuracy, where accuracy is measured in terms of the number of times the chosen
actions results into correct ones [12]. Supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and
reinforcement learning are the three basic categories into which machine learning may
often be divided.
2
decision-making, and enhance system performance. By automating some jobs and
decision-making procedures, AI can assist in streamlining the overall MFC process.
Continuous data analysis, adaptive operational condition adjustment, and resource
allocation optimization are all capabilities of AI algorithms. This can increase power
generation, maximize energy efficiency, and simplify MFC operation. It is crucial to
remember that AI approaches in MFCs are still a developing topic, and work is being
undertaken to fully realize their potential. The particular MFC system, the data that
are accessible, and the optimization or control goals will determine the individual AI
methodologies and approaches used. The performance, effectiveness, and
sustainability of microbial fuel cells could be improved by using AI technology in
research and development (https://doi.org/10.3390/w15203564 ).[14]
Same as our previous study, The MFC has been built by two chambers of anode and
cathode. The size of these cubic chambers sizes is 7 cm, 6 cm and the height of 8 cm.
The active chamber’s volume is about 300 ml. They were separated by a separator
which is Nafio 117 as the proton exchange membrane. The Nitrogen gas was purged
in the anode chamber to make anaerobic condition. By aquarium pump to the cathode
chamber for ORR process, the air injected to the cathode chamber to complete the
3
Fig. 1. Schematic of AEM-MFC
4
The pH of the anode were adjusted to 6.5-7 which is proper pH for the
microorganisms.
2.1. Enrichment
The anaerobic sludge of plam mill oil effluent (POME, Selangor, Malaysia) was used
to inoculate the media in the anode chamber. It was kept in the anerobic condition and
feedfed at 25oC.
To find out the morphology of the microorganisms which were attached to the
55vp-Zeiss, Germany) was used. As per instruction, the samples must be covered by a
thin layer of gold in the nitrogen atmosphere before capturing the SEM photos.
The produced voltage was measured by a A multi-meter was used to measure the and
the voltages and the results wereare stored in a computerPC. The current and voltage
and current density can be calculated by the formula:as below:
V
I= (1)
R
P=V × I (2)
Where the external resistance is annotated by R and is the external resistance
connected to the system and I and V show are the symbols of the produced current
and voltage respectively.
For finding the COD, A media sample was collected from the anode chamber. The
sample was diluted 10 times with the water and then, 2 mL of the sample was taken
with a syring and added to the high-range COD vials. The vials heated to
temperature of 150 oC. whenWhen the liquid inside the vials become uniform, the
vials were put inside spectrophotometer to measure COD.
The columbic efficiency (CE) can be calculated as follows:per below formula:
5
t
M ∫ I dt
0 (3)
CE=
F b V an ∆ COD
Where the shows the molecular weight of oxygen 16 , and F is the Faraday number.
b is Tthe number of transferred electrons per mole of oxygen. The volume of the
anode is shown by V an and also change of chemical oxygen demand COD is shown
by ∆ COD and the volume of the anode is shown by V an [15].
All the experiments were repeated for three times and the average results were
reported.
AdaBoost sequentially trains models such that at the end of each iteration,
misclassified examples are identified and have their emphasis heightened in a
new training set.
This set is then fed back into the start of the next iteration. Essentially, at each
iteration, a new base-learner is trained with respect to the error of the whole
ensemble learnt so far. Freund et al. proposed an ensemble strategy to develop
the performance of individual learners through updating the weight of instances,
then developed as the AdaBoost algorithm[16].
1
•Defining Weights: wj = , j = 1, 2, ..., n;
n
• For each i, set the training data to a weak learner Wli (x) using weights and obtain
the weighted Error
∑ w j I (t j ≠ w li (x ))
Err i= j=1 n
∑ wj
{
, I ( x ) = 0 ifx=false
1 ifx=true
(1)
j=1
6
(1−Err i)
• For each i, determine weights for predictors as: β=log ( )
Err i
The algorithm aims to improve the running speed and accuracy of the algorithm
model, so it is widely used in various industries. The core of the algorithm is as
follows:
Assuming that the model has k decision trees, the integrated model can be
expressed as follows:
k
^y i=∑ f k ( x i ) , f k ∈ F (2)
1
where: F is the set of regression trees, and f is a regression tree in the set. The
main idea of the algorithm is that each update is based on the prediction results
of the previous model. By adding a new tree f to fit the residual error between
the prediction results of the previous tree and the real value, a new model is
formed, and the new model is used as the basis for the next model learning. The
details are as follows:
Where: ^y i(t ) represents the prediction result of the t-th time, ^y i(t −1)represents the
prediction result of the previous (t-1), and ft(xi) represents the residual fitting
7
value by the newly added regression tree. Obviously, the goal of prediction is to
make the predicted value ^y i of the number group as close as possible to the true
value yi, and the greatest possible generalization capability is required.
Therefore, mathematically speaking this is a fonctionelle optimization problem,
so the objective function is simplified as follows:
(t)
where: The first term l( y i− ^yi ) represents the error function, also called the loss
function. The error function to maximize the fit of the sample through
continuous learning of the model to obtain the minimum difference between the
prediction result and the prediction target. The second term Ω(ft) represents the
regularization item. The regularization item defines the complexity of the tree
and increases the stability of the model by continually simplifying it with the
following formula:
T
1
Ω ( f t ) =γ T + λ ∑ w2j (5)
2 j=1
T represents the number of leaf nodes in the tree and the second part represents
the L2 modulus square of the weight function w of the leaf nodes in the tree, i.e.
L2 regularization of w, which is equivalent to adding L2 smoothing to the score
for each leaf node, with the aim of avoiding overfitting[21].
{
ht =arg minE L ( y , F t−1 ( x ) +h ( x ) ) } (6)
where y denotes the output and h is a gradient step function selected from H, i.e., a
family of functions. The step function can be calculated as follows:
8
J
h ( x )=∑ b j I { x ∈R }
j
(7)
j=1
where Rj denotes the disjoint regions that correspond to the tree's leaves. bj is the
predictive value of the region, and I is an indicator function[25]. The expectation in
Eq. (6) is approximated by the same dataset, which leads to prediction shift and
gradient bias. These issues result in overfitting. CatBoost resolves them by
employing the ordered boosting method, which causes improving the robustness
and generalization ability of the model[25].
Therefore, we present a short description of the SVR conception for the sake of
brevity. SVR attempts to obtain a regression function f(x) for a given dataset
[ (x1, y1), ... .., (xn, yn) ] with x ∈ Rd as the d-dimensional input space and y ∈ R as
the output vector dependent on the input data to estimate the output as below:
where b denotes bias vectors, w shows the weight, and φ(x) refers to the function
of the kernel. The following minimization problem proposed by Vapnik should
be solved in order to achieve the right values of the weight and bias vectors [30]:
9
N
1
minimize w T w+C ∑ ¿ ¿ (9)
2 j =1
¿ (10)
n
f ( x )=∑ ( a k −a¿k ) K ( x k , x 1 ) +b (11)
j=1
¿
where K(xk, x1) represents the kernel function; ak and a k represent the Lagrange
multipliers that follow the 0k and kC constraints.
The kernel function is denoted as K(xk, x1), while the Lagrange multipliers that
satisfy the restrictions 0k and kC are represented by ak and a_k^*, respectively.
1. Attachment of microorganisms
10
Fig.2. SEM photo of the attached microorganism on the surface of the electrode
They have been tested by CV to ensure their capability for producing the electricity in
Figure.3. As can be observed in the figure 3, some oxidation and reduction peak can
be seen. They clearly, emphasize the oxidation and reduction activities of
microorganisms while before inoculation, no peak was detected. It means that there
are some exoelectrogenic microorganisms in the media which result in catalytic
activity, COD removal and electron and protons production.
Figure 2 illustrates the adhesion of microbes to the electrode's surface. The graphic
illustrates many forms of bacteria adhering to the electrode's surface. Electricity is
generated through the consumption of organic substrates.These have been tested
by CV tests to verify their capacity to generate electricity as shown in Figure 3. Figure
3 displays noticeable oxidation and reduction peaks. The microorganisms' oxidation
and reduction activities were clearly emphasised, as no peak was seen prior to
inoculation. This indicates the presence of exoelectrogenic bacteria in the media,
which leads to catalytic activity, elimination of chemical oxygen demand (COD), and
creation of electrons and protons.
11
Fig.3 cyclic voltammetry of the microorganisms
12
coefficient matrix that shows the correlation between input and output
characteristics. The point that is noteworthy in this figure is that the
amount of COD removal increases dramatically with the increase of
vitamin content, also the amount of vitamin has a direct relationship with
power density and columbic efficiency (CE).
Fig.14.Box plot of the input and output variables.
Fig.3 5 Pearson correlation matrix between the input and output variables.
Statistical criteria were used to evaluate the accuracy and power of the proposed
techniques in predicting output parameter. The statistical variables used in the
analysis were root mean square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (R2), The
mathematical expression of the aforementioned criteria is as below:
13
Root mean square error:
√
n
1
RMSE= ∑ ( X i exp−X i pred )2
n i=1
Correlation coefficient:
2
R =1−¿
In the formulas presented above, Xi,exp is the empirical value of the parameters, and
Xi,pred is the parameter value predicted by the proposed prediction tools.
Table 1 shows the quantitative evaluation of the proposed strategies using the above
indicators for power density. The accuracy of the training and testing sets for
evaluation metrics are displayed in detail in this assessment. According to this
evaluation, all the created models are able to calculate power density for training and
testing data.
According to Table 1, the XGBoost model with R2=0.8942 and RMSE=4.0997e+01
has the best performance and prediction among all the used models.
Table1
14
In order to represent the accuracy of the developed models in the present study,
graphical error analysis was also applied along with statistical error analysis. In the
graphical analysis of models, the cross-plot of training and test sets for the developed
models are presented in Fig. 63 for Power density. In these graphs, the predicted
power density is plotted against the actual value. As can be seen, for the XGBoost
model both test and training sets, accumulation of the training and test sets around the
unit slope line is very dense. the maximum difference between the experimental and
predicted values of Power density and how they are distributed in the range of
experimental values is useful information obtained from the error distribution
diagram. The congestion of points around the zero line indicates the accuracy of the
model. Fig. 74 indicate the error distribution of the developed models for Power
density. It can be seen that the XGBoost model is more accurate.
15
Fig.3.6.Cross-plots of methods for Power density.
16
The power density results are shown in Fig.568. As can be seen in Fig. 68A, the
maximum power density produced by MFC1, MFC2, MFC3, MFC4 and MFC5 is
150, 243, 395.6, 352.08 and 770.6352.4 mW/m2 respectively. The results show a clear
sharp increase in power generation with by increasing the amount of wolf vitamin
solutions from 2 ml to 6 ml per liter. and after that it starts to decline. It can be due to
the fact that when the amount of vitamin solution increases and the microorganisms
can’t utilize it and so the concentration of the vitamin inside the cell get increased and
subsequently they spoil the energy metabolism in bacteria and support some certain
functions of organisms [31, 32]. by osmosis phenomena the cell get dehydrated.
The power density values are displayed in Figure 568. Fig. 68A illustrates the highest
power density generated by MFC1, MFC2, MFC3, MFC4, and MFC5 as 150, 243,
395.6, 352.08, and 770.6352.4 mW/m2, respectively. The findings indicate a distinct
and rapid rise in power output when the quantity of wolf vitamin solutions is
increased from 2 ml to 6 ml per litre. Subsequently, there is a subsequent decrease in
power generation. The increase in the amount of vitamin solution can lead to an
accumulation of the vitamin inside the cell. This can disrupt the energy metabolism in
bacteria and support specific functions in organisms [31, 32]. The cell undergoes
dehydration by osmosis.
Figure 6b displays the polarisation curve of the MFCs. It is utilised to determine the
exterior resistance of the systems.
Figure 6 b, shows the polarization curve of the MFCs. It’s used to find the external
resistance of the systems.
yeast extract from 1 g/L to 5 g/L.
Fig. 7 9depicts the COD removal and CE of MFC systems as a result of the catalytic
activity of microorganisms in wastewater. MFC4 and MFC5 had the highest COD
removal by 80% and 90% respectively, while MFC2 could remove the COD only by
59%. The lowest CE (29%) belongs to MFC3, and the highest CE (50%) is for MFC4.
17
Fig.5.The power density versus current density.
18
Fig.68.The polarization curve of the MFCs.
19
Fig.79.COD removal and CE of different MFCs.
Optimization:
In this research, NSGA-II algorithm was used to optimize MFC. NSGA-II is one of
the most influential and widely cited algorithms in the field of multi-objective
optimization. The multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II maintains variety
and convergence in the Pareto front by utilizing crowding distance and non-
dominated sorting. The parent and offspring populations are combined in this elitist
algorithm, which then chooses the best solutions based on distance and rank.
Table 2 shows the result of optimization and validation of optimized result. The
percentage error of current density, power density, COD removal and coulombic
efficiency is 2.62 0.79 %, 0.94 0.50 %, 4.05 1.89 % and 4.49 1.27%, respectively. In
sum, all percentage errors less than 5 2 % and acceptable. Selecting the appropriate
optimization will require further investigation because the ideal circumstances can
differ depending on the economic perspective.
The NSGA-II method was employed to optimise the MFC in this study. NSGA-II
is a highly significant and extensively referenced algorithm in the domain of
multi-objective optimisation. The NSGA-II algorithm effectively preserves
diversity and convergence in the Pareto front through the use of crowding
distance and non-dominated sorting. This elitist algorithm combines the parent
and offspring populations, and subsequently selects the most optimal solutions
based on criteria such as distance and rank.
Table 2 displays the outcome of the optimisation process and the subsequent
validation of the optimised result. The current density, power density, COD
elimination, and coulombic efficiency have percentage errors of 2.62 ± 0.79%,
20
0.94 ± 0.50%, 4.05 ± 1.89%, and 4.49 ± 1.27%, respectively. Overall, any
percentage errors below 5.2% are considered acceptable. Further analysis is
necessary to determine the optimal optimisation strategy, as the ideal conditions
may vary based on the economic viewpoint.
Figure.10 Shows the MFC whi ran for long times. As can be seen the voltage
increasing during the time and reaches it maximum almost after around 100
hours. After that the voltage stay at constant value. The trends of COD removal
is similar to the voltage however it has a little gap. It reaches its maximum
(around 80%). That’s the required time for attachment of the microorganisms
on the electrode surface and breaking down of the substrate’s structure[33]. The
CE shows the same trend by this difference that the CE shows a continuous
increment with the time. It means that, with the time more exoelectrogenic
microorganisms contribute to the substrate degradation and electrons and
proton’s production[34].
Figure 10 depicts the MFC operating for an extended duration. The voltage gradually
increases over time and reaches its peak after approximately 100 hours. Subsequently,
21
the voltage remains at a steady magnitude. The patterns of chemical oxygen demand
(COD) elimination closely parallel the voltage, with a slight discrepancy. It attains its
peak at approximately 80%. This is the necessary duration for the bacteria to adhere
to the electrode surface and degrade the structure of the substrate[33]. The CE
exhibits a consistent upward trajectory, in contrast to this distinction where the CE
demonstrates a continual increase over time. This indicates that with time, an
increasing number of exoelectrogenic bacteria play a role in breaking down the
substrate and generating electrons and protons[34].
Conclusion
This study has testeddemonstrated the effect of different MFCs with various
amount of wolf vitamin solution an important component of media in the
performance of microbial fuel cell. The experimental work has proved that:
a) When the amount of wolf vitamine solution increase until 6 ml in a liter, the
power density also increases 2.45 fold and after that it start to declined slowly
that can be due to vitamin precipitation and deactivation of microroganisms.
[b)] The CV test, showed high catalytic activities of microorganisms. The
oxidation and reduction peaks are the strong evidences of high bio catalytic
activities of microorganisms that convert substrates to the electricity..
b)[c)] Four intelligent and powerful models including Ada-Boost, XGB, Cat-Boost
and SVR were used to predict power density. The XGBoost model has the highest
accuracy in predicting power density with R-squared values for training and
testing data sets of 0.0029 and 4.0997e+01, respectively, and RMSE values for
training and testing data sets of 1.0000 and 0.8942, respectively.
c) Using the NSGA-II algorithm, the output values were optimized. Current density,
power density, COD removal, and coulombic efficiency all reached optimal levels
with error percentages of 0.79 %, 0.5%, 1.89%, and 1.27%, in that order. And d
d) Different applications of MFC was cleared through running MFC over a period of
time. The CE of an MFC shall be increased in long times while for having higher
power output the MFC needs to reach to its maximum value and then it should be
maintained. Beside that it can be seen, the COD removal of the system reaches it
maximum value over time by maturation of microorganisms.
This study has examined the impact of several microbial fuel cells (MFCs)
containing varied quantities of wolf vitamin solution, a crucial component of
the media, on the performance of the MFC. The empirical research has
demonstrated that when the concentration of wolf vitamin solution is
increased to 6 ml per litre, the power density likewise increases by a factor of
2.45. However, beyond this point, the power density gradually decreases,
possibly due to the precipitation of vitamins and deactivation of
microorganisms. The CV test demonstrated the microorganisms' significant
catalytic capabilities. The presence of oxidation and reduction peaks serves as
compelling proof of the robust bio-catalytic activities exhibited by
microorganisms that facilitate the conversion of substrates into electricity.
Four sophisticated and robust models, namely Ada-Boost, XGB, Cat-Boost,
and SVR, were employed to forecast power density. The XGBoost model
demonstrates superior accuracy in forecasting power density, as evidenced by
its R-squared values of 0.0029 and 4.0997e+01 for the training and testing
22
data sets, respectively. Additionally, the model exhibits low root mean square
error (RMSE) values of 1.0000 and 0.8942 for the training and testing data
sets, respectively.
The output values were optimised using the NSGA-II method. The error
percentages for current density, power density, COD elimination, and
coulombic efficiency were 0.79%, 0.5%, 1.89%, and 1.27%, respectively,
when they achieved their ideal levels. The various applications of MFC were
demonstrated by running MFC for an extended duration. The CE of a
microbial fuel cell (MFC) will gradually grow over extended periods of time.
In order to get a higher power output, the MFC must attain its maximum CE
and then be consistently maintained at that level. In addition, the system's
COD removal reaches its maximum value over time due to the maturity of
microorganisms.
References:
[1] M.O. Idris, N.A.M. Noh, M.N.M. Ibrahim, A.A. Yaqoob, Sustainable microbial fuel cell functionalized
with a bio-waste: A feasible route to formaldehyde bioremediation along with bioelectricity
generation, Chemical Engineering Journal 455 (2023) 140781.
[2] R. Kandpal, M. Shahadat, S.W. Ali, C. Hu, S.Z. Ahammad, Material specific enrichment of
electroactive microbes on polyaniline-supported anodes in a single chamber multi-anode assembly
microbial fuel cell, Materials Research Bulletin 157 (2023) 111983.
[3] T. Jamal, G.M. Shafiullah, F. Dawood, A. Kaur, M.T. Arif, R. Pugazhendhi, R.M. Elavarasan, S.F.
Ahmed, Fuelling the future: An in-depth review of recent trends, challenges and opportunities of
hydrogen fuel cell for a sustainable hydrogen economy, Energy Reports 10 (2023) 2103-2127.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.011.
[4] K. Agrawal, L.G. Nair, V. Chaturvedi, P. Verma, Designing microbial cellulases using genetic
engineering approach: A promising strategy towards zero-waste cellulosic biorefinery, Biocatalysis
and Agricultural Biotechnology 52 (2023) 102830.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102830.
[5] Y.-R. Yang, Y.-X. Guo, Q.-Y. Wang, B.-Y. Hu, S.-Y. Tian, Q.-Z. Yang, Z.-A. Cheng, Q.-J. Chen, G.-Q.
Zhang, Impacts of composting duration on physicochemical properties and microbial communities
during short-term composting for the substrate for oyster mushrooms, Science of The Total
Environment 847 (2022) 157673. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157673.
[6] Y. Lv, X. Liu, S. Zhou, Q. Yu, Y. Xu, Microbial saccharification – Biorefinery platform for
lignocellulose, Industrial Crops and Products 189 (2022) 115761.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115761.
23
[7] J. Becker, U.W. Liebal, A.N.T. Phan, L. Ullmann, L.M. Blank, Renewable carbon sources to
biochemicals and -fuels: contributions of the smut fungi Ustilaginaceae, Current Opinion in
Biotechnology 79 (2023) 102849. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102849.
[8] X. Hu, X. Tan, X. Shi, W. Liu, T. Ouyang, An integrated assessment of microfluidic microbial fuel cell
subjected to vibration excitation, Applied Energy 336 (2023) 120852.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120852.
[9] E.T. Sayed, H. Rezk, M.A. Abdelkareem, A.G. Olabi, Artificial neural network based modelling and
optimization of microalgae microbial fuel cell, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2023).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.081.
[10] C. Saran, D. Purchase, G.D. Saratale, R.G. Saratale, L.F.R. Ferreira, M. Bilal, H.M. Iqbal, C.M.
Hussain, S.I. Mulla, R.N. Bharagava, Microbial fuel cell: A green eco-friendly agent for tannery
wastewater treatment and simultaneous bioelectricity/power generation, Chemosphere 312 (2023)
137072.
[11] H. Rezk, A.G. Olabi, M.A. Abdelkareem, E.T. Sayed, Artificial intelligence as a novel tool for
enhancing the performance of urine fed microbial fuel cell as an emerging approach for simultaneous
power generation and wastewater treatment, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
148 (2023) 104726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2023.104726.
[12] J. Alzubi, A. Nayyar, A. Kumar, Machine learning from theory to algorithms: an overview, Journal
of physics: conference series, IOP Publishing, 2018, p. 012012.
[13] A. Garg, V. Vijayaraghavan, S.S. Mahapatra, K. Tai, C.H. Wong, Performance evaluation of
microbial fuel cell by artificial intelligence methods, Expert Systems with Applications 41(4, Part 1)
(2014) 1389-1399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.038.
[14] M.A. Abdelkareem, S.I. Alshathri, M.S. Masdar, A.G. Olabi, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference
System Modeling and Optimization of Microbial Fuel Cells for Wastewater Treatment, Water 15(20)
(2023) 3564.
[15] C.-Y. Cheng, F.-Y. Chung, P.-Y. Chou, C. Huang, Surface modification of polytetrafluoroethylene by
atmospheric pressure plasma-grafted polymerization, Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 40
(2020) 1507-1523.
[16] Y. Freund, R.E. Schapire, A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an
Application to Boosting, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 55(1) (1997) 119-139.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1997.1504.
[17] M.-R. Mohammadi, F. Hadavimoghaddam, M. Pourmahdi, S. Atashrouz, M.T. Munir, A. Hemmati-
Sarapardeh, A.H. Mosavi, A. Mohaddespour, Modeling hydrogen solubility in hydrocarbons using
extreme gradient boosting and equations of state, Scientific Reports 11(1) (2021) 17911.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97131-8.
[18] T. Chen, C. Guestrin, Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, Proceedings of the 22nd acm
sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2016, pp. 785-794.
[19] J. Dong, L. Peng, X. Yang, Z. Zhang, P. Zhang, XGBoost‐based intelligence yield prediction and
reaction factors analysis of amination reaction, Journal of Computational Chemistry 43(4) (2022) 289-
302.
[20] W. Li, Y. Yin, X. Quan, H. Zhang, Gene expression value prediction based on XGBoost algorithm,
Frontiers in genetics 10 (2019) 1077.
[21] J. Li, X. An, Q. Li, C. Wang, H. Yu, X. Zhou, Y.-a. Geng, Application of XGBoost algorithm in the
optimization of pollutant concentration, Atmospheric Research 276 (2022) 106238.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106238.
[22] L. Prokhorenkova, G. Gusev, A. Vorobev, A.V. Dorogush, A. Gulin, CatBoost: unbiased boosting
with categorical features, Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).
[23] Y. Ding, Z. Chen, W. Lu, X. Wang, A CatBoost approach with wavelet decomposition to improve
satellite-derived high-resolution PM2.5 estimates in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Atmospheric Environment
249 (2021) 118212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118212.
[24] S.C. Chelgani, H. Nasiri, A. Tohry, H. Heidari, Modeling industrial hydrocyclone operational
variables by SHAP-CatBoost-A “conscious lab” approach, Powder Technology 420 (2023) 118416.
[25] N.-H. Nguyen, K.T. Tong, S. Lee, A. Karamanli, T.P. Vo, Prediction compressive strength of cement-
based mortar containing metakaolin using explainable Categorical Gradient Boosting model,
Engineering Structures 269 (2022) 114768.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114768.
24
[26] M.K. Uçar, Classification Performance-Based Feature Selection Algorithm for Machine Learning:
P-Score, IRBM 41(4) (2020) 229-239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2020.01.006.
[27] Q. Quan, Z. Hao, H. Xifeng, L. Jingchun, Research on water temperature prediction based on
improved support vector regression, Neural Computing and Applications 34(11) (2022) 8501-8510.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04836-4.
[28] A.J. Smola, B. Schölkopf, A tutorial on support vector regression, Statistics and Computing 14(3)
(2004) 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88.
[29] B. Schölkopf, A.J. Smola, R.C. Williamson, P.L. Bartlett, New support vector algorithms, Neural
computation 12(5) (2000) 1207-1245.
[30] V. Vapnik, S. Golowich, A. Smola, Support vector method for function approximation, regression
estimation and signal processing, Advances in neural information processing systems 9 (1996).
[31] D.Z. Khater, K.M. El-Khatib, R.Y.A. Hassan, Effect of vitamins and cell constructions on the activity
of microbial fuel cell battery, Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 16(2) (2018) 369-373.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.02.011.
[32] J. Islam, G. Chilkoor, K. Jawaharraj, S.S. Dhiman, R. Sani, V. Gadhamshetty, Vitamin-C-enabled
reduced graphene oxide chemistry for tuning biofilm phenotypes of methylotrophs on nickel
electrodes in microbial fuel cells, Bioresource Technology 300 (2020) 122642.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122642.
[33] V.K. Kumar, S.P. Manangath, S. Gajalakshmi, Innovative pilot-scale constructed wetland-microbial
fuel cell system for enhanced wastewater treatment and bioelectricity production, Chemical
Engineering Journal 460 (2023) 141686.
[34] W. Yang, X. Wang, M. Son, B.E. Logan, Simultaneously enhancing power density and coulombic
efficiency with a hydrophobic Fe–N4/activated carbon air cathode for microbial fuel cells, Journal of
Power Sources 465 (2020) 228264.
25