Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ngugi Wa Thiongo's Decolonizing the Mind and Makoni and Pannycook's Disinventing
Student's Name
Institution Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Date
2
tribute to all individuals who write in African languages and those who have preserved the
dignity of African literature, culture, and philosophy over time. As Makoni and Pannycook
(2005) point out in their work Disinventing and (Re)Constituting Languages, to engage
critically with modern language, every critical linguistic effort must address the necessity for
linguistic disinvention and reconfiguration, no matter how noble their intentions may be on
the political front of things. This response will highlight the main ideas from Wa Thiongo
Ngugi and Makoni & Alastair Pennycook and how the two works interact.
Ngugi Wa Thiong'o (1994), in discussing how language was utilized for spiritual
oppression, based his work from his schooling life. Wa Thiong'o characterizes Gikuyu as the
language for his peasant family's contact with each other, with the society at large, and as
their method to exchange culture, notably via orature. According to him, languages "serve as
the material and political consequences of how we talk and think about language will lead to
unfortunate situations in which it is the language rather than its speakers that are developed.
Makoni and Pannycook (2005) make the case that acknowledging that languages have
been formed and that dialectal meta-language affects the universe through specific ways is
not enough; we must also comprehend the complex web of links that exist among language
language, colonial history, and tactics for disinvention and reconstruction. Any serious effort
placed on linguistic that is aimed at a specific language in the present world must
comprehend the adverse language impacts it may spawn unless it faces the need for linguistic
Literature," the key debate is the African language should employ by African authors in
composing their works of literature. Despite the fact that skeptics have recognized the
difficult nature of language formation, Makoni and Pannycook (2005) contend with Ngugi
Wa Thiong'o idea and further contend that English language does not exist, nor is there any
other language for that matter. Makoni and Pannycook (2005) suggest that theree is still a
need for this analytic approach to language. to acquire a larger grasp of the processes of
creativity.
A national culture must contain that nation's literature conveyed in that nation's
original language (Ngugi wa Thiong'o, 1994). For Thiong'o, this means that in regions where
colonialism has been used as a means of oppression, the languages of the occupying power
should not serve as the primary language of instruction and culture. Ngugi wa Thiong stresses
that colonialism and the efforts and wishes of Africans to recover their cultures, economics,
and politics from colonial rulers are the social factors that have made the language of African
literature require attention and problem solving responses. He, however, argues that while the
colonial control, which can be classified as physical ceased, Africans are still exposed to
In conclusion, Makoni & Pannycook (2005) and Ngugi wa Thiong'o (1994) address
themes of language, education, colonialism and neo-colonialism, and culture in their writings.
Consequently, According to Makoni and Pannycook (2005), the fight for the creation of
language with regards to concerns of societal stratification gave rise to the unique shaping of
language and its function in the manufacture modernism: While Ngugi wa Thiong'o (1994)
emphasizes that the language of African literature cannot be analyzed meaningfully in terms
of the problem that is calligraphic because of societal factors that made it an issue to be
addressed.
4
References
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2005). Disinventing and (re) constituting languages. Critical