Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
A method to monitor glucose in whole blood is presented. The aim of the project was
to develop a prototype for a bedside monitor system for semi-continuous monitoring of
the blood glucose concentration, requiring only one calibration. This was made possible
by using the special advantage of the thermal sensor technique in combination with the
adjustment of flow. The glucose concentration was determined from the difference between
the sensor response and an estimated background signal. Using standard addition
technique, ~zalibration factors for background and sensitivity were set and remained
unchanged ,during the monitoring. The background signal was 45 ___8 mV (mean + S.D.,
n = 8) and 'the sensitivity was 28 + 1 mV/mmol (mean + S.D., n = 4). Recovery in whole
blood was o0-98% (mean 94%, n = 12). With an injection interval of 3 min the precision
with the sensor was < 3 % over more than 100 blood samples. Response time was about
60 s. The calculated glucose values correlated, r = 0.98, with the values obtained with an
YSI glucose: analyser (Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH, USA), over the
range 2-20 mmol/l.
1. Introduction
*Corresponding author.
2.1. Equipment
The main components of the bedside monitor system was an enzyme
thermistor together with a buffer pump and an injection valve connected
to a computer for control, analysis and presentation of the results. For
connecting the sensor to the patient we used a prototype to a sampling
device, composed of a double-lumen catheter glued to standard pump
T. Carlsson et al. I Clinica Chimica Acta 251 (1996) 187-200 189
amplifier
I 15.5 m m ~
PC
in~
/~' ~ oolurnn
~zyn~tl-~mslm-
w~pains
liquidflow
d~ ln~f~
Fig. 1. The experimental setup used in the project was composed of an enzyme thermistor,
a pump for buffer and anticoagulant, an injection valve, and an amplifier. The PC was
connected through an interface card with A/D and D/A conversion facilities (12 bit). The
sampling device was connected to the injection valve by standard plastic fittings.
0,5
0.4
~0.3
~0.2
0.1
J
0 --
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Glucosecovxentralion,mmoFI
Fig. 2. The background signal was determined through a standard addition technique. In
this, increasingamounts of glucose were added to aliquots of whole blood samples in steps
of 2, 4 and 10 retool/l, respectively,giving samples of increasing concentrations of glucose.
The response was plotted against the glucoseconcentration, the slope showing the column
sensitivity. By extrapolating the response lines to zero glucose concentration, the y-
intercept represented an estimation of the background signal (non-glucose-dependent
signal). In the figure, results from three differentsamples are shown.
injected to the sensor. For comparison, samples were also taken from an
indwelling catheter in the left forearm and analyzed off-line with the Y S I
glucose analyser.
2.3. Biocompatibility
At the start of the experiment we used a sampling device without any
pretreatment; however, we soon encountered clogging problems with this.
These clots were mostly located at the site of the injection valve, in some
cases at the connection between the double-lumen catheter and the p u m p
tubing, and sometimes at the tip of the catheter. For improved biocom-
patibility some parts (the injection valve and some critical connections) of
the sampling device were therefore coated with covalently coupled heparin
(Carmeda Stockholm, Sweden) [11-].
3. Results
From the standard addition trials we have found that the column
sensitivity (mV/mmol) with a sample volume of 10 #1 was 46 m V / m m o l
(Table 1) in standard solution and 45 mV/mmol (Table 2) in whole blood.
With a 7.5 pl loop the value was 28 mV/mmol in blood, significantly
smaller than the sensitivity, 36 mV/mmol, found in standard solution
(from Fig. 3). Our explanation of this is that, at 10 pl, the dispersion of
the substrate in the blood sample was as effective as in the standard
sample. Decreasing the sample size by shortening the sample loop led to
a reduced dispersion in the blood sample. This change in sensitivity was
more or less identical to the size reduction. We speculate that the possible
explanation of this is related to the high viscosity of the blood. The
decrease in standard sensitivity was, on the other hand, directly related to
the smaller sample volume (46/36 ~ 1.3; 10/7.5 ,-~ 1.3) Thus substrate
transport in the standard sample was not restricted by decreased disper-
sion in this case. The effect of sample loop diameter (I.D.) and dilution of
the sample can be seen in Fig. 3. At a fixed volume of 10 pl, I.D. = 0.15
mm and 1 + 1 dilution gives about two to three times higher sensitivity
compared to I.D. = 0.3 m m (1 + 1). Extrapolating the line for 0.15 mm
(1 + 1) gives a sensitivity of more than 100 mV/mmol at 22 pl, superior
to all tested cases. The sensitivity was at 7.5 #1 sample volume 36
mV/mmol, nearly the same as 20 #1, I.D. = 0.5 m m (1 + 2). The turnover
of the substrate with I.D. = 0.15 m m (1 + 1) was thus much better, by a
factor of nearly 2. Therefore, we were able to decrease the total amount of
blood necessary for every measurement by using a sample loop with a
smaller I.D. Moreover, the sensitivity in the 7.5 #1 case was only slightly
lower than what was achieved with a sample volume of 20/fl, I.D. = 0.3
T. Carlsson et al. I Clinica Chimica Acta 251 (1996) 187-200 193
Table 1
Sensitivity coefficients for manually packed standard columns
1 48.8
2 45.8
3 45.9
4 48.4
5 47.6
6 45.2
7 47.1
8 44
9 47.4
10 46.8
11 42.8
12 48.1
13 43.7
14 48.9
15 45.9
16 46.8
Mean -I- S.D. 46.5 + 1.8
The sensitivity coefficients were determined from the slope of the response lines
using standard glucose solutions of varying concentrations. Sample size was 10/A and flow
rate 1.2 ml/min. The samples were diluted 1 + 1 with anticoagulant solution
before injection. The intervariation among the columns was below 4%.
Table 2
Determination of the value of the background signal and the sensitivity coefficient in whole
blood
Experiment 1
1 40 45
2 38 46
3 50 46
4 53 44
Mean 45 45 + 1
Experiment 2
1 52 29
2 31 29
3 54 28
4 53 27
Mean 48 28 + ]
Linear regression analysis was performed after the addition of known amounts of a
glucose standard to aliquots of the samples. The background signal was determined from
the y-intercept and the sensitivity coefficient from the slope. In the first experiment a
sample loop of 10 pl volume was used while in the second experiment the sample volume
used was 7.5 pl. Two separate columns were used. As shown, the intercept values in the
experiments were not significantly different.
80
/
70 /
0.5 mm (1+2)//"
~ 60
5O
0.15 ~ (1+1/)//" + ~
///~/ 0.3 mm (1
~ 20
10
0 6 12 18 24 30
Samplevolume
Fig. 3. The sensitivity, expressed as mV/mmol, is a function of sample loop volume, sample
loop diameter, and dilution. For the overall best performance, an optimization between
sensitivity and column lifetime was done. As can be seen from the figure, sample tubing
with I.D. = 0.15 ram, 1 + 1 dilution, gave the same specific sensitivity (slope) as tubing of
0.5 mm (1 + 2). Thus, we could decrease the amount of blood in the sample by a factor
of two while preserving sensitivity.
T. Carlsson et al. I Clinica Chimica Acta 251 (1996) 187-200 195
0.8
0.7
0.6
_- 0.5
~'0.4 .,,-.-.,.,--
~0.3
/
1).2
0.1
0
20 40 60 80 100 120
Number of whole bleed samples
Fig. 4. The glucose signal from two different whole blood samples (squares, triangles) was
determined. The thermal baseline drift (dashed line) did not interfere with the glucose
specific signal in the sample for over 100 whole blood samples. Injection interval was 3 min
and the overall variation coefficient was 2.3%. The glucose concentration, as determined
with our method, was 6.04 + 0.13 mmol/l, n = 96 (squares) and 7.78 ___0.18 mmol/l,
n = 20 (triangles).
mmol/l and would probably be without any clinical relevance. The special
advantage with the methodology is demonstrated in Fig. 4. This figure
shows that a drift in the thermal baseline (dashed line) did not have any
effect on the true measured glucose signal. This is because the glucose
value was always calculated from the difference between a peak maximum
signal and a peak start signal (relative measurement). Therefore, any drift
in the baseline will always be compensated for. Fig. 5 presents results from
measurements in sera and whole blood compared with values determined
with an YSI instrument. The analytical recovery (through standard
addition) in sera was found to be in the range of 95 to 106% (mean 101%,
n = 19), while in whole blood the range was 90 to 98% (mean 94%, n %
12). In comparison, the recovery with the YSI analysis was in the range
93 to 107% (mean 97%, n = 11) in blood.
In the patient monitoring trials, problems with clogging in the sampling
part were in some cases so troublesome to overcome that the trial had to
be cancelled. Dismantling and visual examination of the device showed the
presence: of blood clots. The clots were located mostly in the fine lumen of
the catheter and at the interface between the sample loop tubing and the
inlet site of the injection valve head (narrow passage). In some few cases,
clogging at the tip of the catheter also was observed. We noticed a
196 T. Carlsson et al. I Clinica Chimica Acta 251 (1996) 187-200
20
18
[]
[]
14
[] D>~x
.~ ]0
~EU
s
8 6
~ 2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Ghicm¢ concentration retool/l, ET-mcthod
Fig. 5. Glucose concentration in sera (square) and whole blood (cross) determined with the
ET method in comparison with the YSI method. Results in sera are mean of three, while
in whole blood we used the mean of two determinations. Regression analysis for whole
blood gave YSI -- 0.96ET+0.35 mmol/l and r = 0.99.
4. D i s c u s s i o n
A
12
10
| x x
X
r7 0 O
X
O 0
×
O 0
[]
X
OD D
o []
f $ o
x
0 o
o
o
o
6 x o
x 0 0
J o o o o o
o []
0 0 .
o
16 o ×
×0 ×
14
0 ° o o o o
~× x o o
12 o 0
[] 0 0 O o
0 []
$
6
4
2
50 100 150 200 2JO 3OO
Tia~ m
Fig. 6. On-line monitoring in two diabetic patients with the prototype bedside monitor.
Injection interval was 4 min (A) and 10 min (B), respectively. Values with reference method
shown as crosses. The regression equation was ET = 0.76YS1 + 1.28 mmol/1, r = 0.97.
Acknowledgments
T h i s w o r k w a s s u p p o r t e d in p a r t b y g r a n t s f r o m the N a t i o n a l S w e d i s h
B o a r d for T e c h n i c a l D e v e l o p m e n t ( N U T E K ) , the Swedish M e d i c a l R e -
s e a r c h C o u n c i l ( N o . 19x-6589) a n d the Bert y o n K a n t z o w F o u n d a t i o n .
References
[1] Sacks D. Determination of glucose in body fluids. In: Burtis C, Ashwood E, eds. Tietz
Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: W B Saunders Company
1994;958-967.
1"2] Wiener K. Whole blood glucose: what are we actually measuring? Ann Clin Biochem
1995;2;2:1-8.
[3] Preidel W, yon Lucadou I, Lager W. In vivo experiments with the electrocatalytic
glucose sensor in sheep. Biosens Bioelectron 1993;8:299-306.
I-4] Moatti-Sirat D, Poitout V, Thom6 V et al. Reduction of acetaminophen interference
in glucose sensors by a composite Nation membrane: demonstration in rats and man.
Diabetologia 1994;37:610-616.
1-5] Poitout V, Moaffi-Sirat D, Reach G. Calibration in dogs of a subcutaneous
minial:urized glucose sensor using a glucose meter for blood glucose determination.
Biosens Bioelectron 1992;7:587-592.
[6] Velho G, Froguel Ph, Th6venot D, Reach G. Strategies for calibrating a subcu-
taneous glucose sensor. Biochim Biomed Acta 1989;48:957-964.
[7] Harborn U, Bin X, Danielsson B. Evaluation of a miniaturized thermal biosensor for
the determination of glucose in whole blood. (in press).
[8] Danielsson B. Calorimetric biosensors. J Biotechnol 1990;15:187-200.
[9] Weetall HH. Preparation of immobilized proteins covalently coupled through silane-
coupling agents to inorganic supports. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1993;9:157-188.
[10] Mattiason B, Danielsson B, Mosbach K. A split-flow enzyme thermistor. Anal Lett
1976;9:867-889.
[11] Olsson P, Larm O. Biologically active heparin-coating in medical devices. Int J Artif
Organs 1991;14(8):453-456.
[12] Wilding P, Pfahler J, Haim B, Zemel J, Kricka L. Manipulation and flow of
biolo~;ical fluids in straight channels micromachined in silicon. Clin Chem 1994;40/
1:43-47.
[13] Diqu61ou A. Lemozy S, Dupouy D, Bernard B, Sakariassen K, Cadroy Y. Effect of
blood flow on thrombin generation is dependent on the nature of the thrombogenic
surface. Blood 1994;84:2206-22t3.
[14] Nobu'ioshi K, Motohisa F. Flow enthalpimetric determination of glucose. Methods
Enzyraol 1988;137:225-232.
[15] Harborn U, Bin X, Danielsson B. Determination of glucose in diluted blood with a
thermal flow injection analysis biosensor. Anal Lett 1994;27(14):2639-2645.
[16] Bin X, Hedberg U, Mecklenburg M, Danielsson B. Fast determination of whole
blood glucose with a calorimetric micro-biosensor. Sens Actuators B 1993;15-
16:14!-144.
[17] Schmidt F, Slutter W, Schoonen A. Glucose concentration in subcutaneous extracel-
lular space. Diabetes Care 1993;5:695-700.
200 T. Carlsson et aL I Clinica Chimica Acta 251 (1996) 187-200