Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We write on behalf of NFR Turtle LLC (“NFR Turtle”) in advance of the January 18,
2024 Public Hearing1 (the “Hearing”) concerning the proposed designation by the Niagara Falls
Historic Preservation Commission (the “Commission”) of NFR Turtle’s property located at 25
Rainbow Boulevard (the “Turtle”) as a historical landmark. For the reasons set forth below, we
respectfully request that the Commission refrain from recommending such designation to the
Niagara Falls City Council and terminate this proceeding without delay.
According to both the New York State Parks, Recreation, and Historical Preservation and
the National Register of Historic Places, a property generally is not eligible for listing as an
historical landmark until it is at least 50 years old.2 “Properties less than 50 years of age must be
exceptionally important to be considered eligible for listing.” Id. The Turtle, built in 1979, is
only 45 years old. It is, therefore, ineligible to be designated an historical landmark absent a
showing that it is “exceptionally important.” Such a showing has not, and cannot, be made.
1We respectfully request that the Commission make this letter part of the official record of the January 18, 2024
Public Hearing.
2Copies of FAQ’s detailing this requirement from the New York State Parks, Recreation, and Historical
Preservation and the National Register of Historic Places are collectively attached hereto as Attachment A.
Page 2
Based on our diligent research, it would appear that the Commission has always followed
the “50-year rule.” Of the 37 properties in Niagara Falls listed on the National Register of
Historic Places, not a single property is less than 50 years old.3 Almost all, in fact, are more than
100 years old. Accordingly, the Commission’s proposed designation of the 45-year-old Turtle
constitutes a significant departure from its historic practices.
3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Niagara_Falls,_New_York.
Page 3
It also seems clear that the Commission’s proposed actions on the Turtle are out of step
with public opinion, as well as with the views of the Iroquois Confederacy of Nations. Niagara
Falls-based freelance journalist, Sharon Bailey, put it exactly right earlier this month in a letter to
the Niagara Gazette, when she wrote:
Yes, the building is a rare example of indigenous architecture and was a valuable
cultural asset for the city. No one, including NFR and New York State, has been
successful in acquiring and developing a practical reuse for the once cherished
cultural hub. Not one tribe member of the Six Nations seems interested in
stepping up to save it either…. Restoring the Turtle to a safe and usable condition
would be an incredibly expensive endeavor, requiring thousands, possibly
millions, of dollars. Who would pay for that? The city does not have the resources
to invest in the Turtle…. Any assertion that the preservation of the building would
appeal to tourists and investors who appreciate its historical and unique qualities
seems foolish.
***
***
Providing landmark status to the Turtle would only prolong its suffering.
Enough is enough. It’s time to say goodbye to the Turtle, published in the Niagara
Gazette, January 3, 2024.4
In sum, because the Turtle is less than 50 years old and is not “exceptionally important,”
this proceeding must be terminated by the Commission in accordance with Section 1335.05-2(D)
of the Historic Preservation Regulations of the City of Niagara Falls (“HPR”).
II. Alternatively, the Commission must disclose additional information prior to any
historical landmark recommendation to the City Council.
4 https://www.niagara-gazette.com/opinion/bailey-enough-is-enough-its-time-to-say-goodbye-to-the-
turtle/article_f262015c-a9ae-11ee-8163-13493e166c8a.html.
Page 4
The Commission has not established that its actions comply with the very specific
requirements of the Historic Preservation Regulations, including regarding the composition of
the Commission itself and the involvement of various City Departments. Accordingly, any
historical landmark recommendation to the City Council regarding the Turtle would be improper.
The Commission has not established that it has seven members, whether all of those
members are City residents, and whether any of its members are architects, historians, licensed
real estate professionals, or licensed professional engineers, as required by law.
Until this information is disclosed to NFR Turtle and the general public so they may
effectively consider and comment upon the proposed historical landmark designation, the
Commission should decline to make any recommendation to the City Council.
B. The Commission has not established that it followed the procedure for
designation of Historical Landmarks.
Historic Preservation Regulation § 1335.05-2(B) requires that “[i]f the proposed action is
on [the Commission’s] own initiative, the [Commission] shall prepare a notice of proposed
designation.” The application or notice must contain (1) the name and address of the property
owner; (2) the parcel number; (3) any available surveys, sketches, photographs or drawings of
the property; (4) a legal description of the property; (5) the zoning of the property; (6) a general
statement of the current condition of the property; (7) the Commission’s proposed action; and
(8) any additional information as the Commission shall deem necessary. See id. The notice or
application must then be sent to the following City departments for comments on the proposed
designation, which shall be made part of the record:
Engineering Department
Assessors Department
Page 5
Law Department
The Commission has not provided NFR Turtle with copies of the notices to, or comments
received from, the City departments set forth in the HPR. Disclosure of this information to NFR
Turtle and the general public must be made in order for there to be meaningful and informed
public consideration and comment on the Commission’s proposed action.
Until this information is disclosed, the Commission must decline to recommend the
historical landmark designation of the Turtle to the City Council.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions about the contents of this
submission. Thank you for your prompt and thoughtful attention to this matter.
/s/Ryan C. Altieri
Ryan C. Altieri
Associate
DIRECT DIAL: 716.844.3726
EMAIL: RALTIERI@HSELAW.COM
RCA:rca
Attachment
EXHIBIT A
New York State and National Registers of Historic Places
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What are the State and National Registers of Historic Places? The State and National Registers are the
official lists of properties significant in history, architecture, engineering, landscape design, archeology, and
culture. Properties may be significant in local, state and/or national contexts. More than 120,000 properties in
New York have received this prestigious recognition.
What qualifies a property for listing on the registers? The registers recognize all aspects of New
York’s diverse history and culture. Eligible properties must represent a significant historic theme (e.g.,
architecture, agriculture, industry, transportation) and they must be intact enough to illustrate their association
with that theme. Properties must usually be more than 50 years of age to be considered for listing.
What are the benefits of being listed on the registers? The State and National Registers are a
recognized and visible component of public and private planning. The registers promote heritage tourism,
economic development and appreciation of historic resources. Benefits include:
Official recognition that a property is significant to the nation, the state, or the local community.
Eligibility to apply for the state homeowner tax credit and/or the state and federal commercial historic
rehabilitation tax credits.
Eligibility (not-for-profit organizations and municipalities only) to apply for New York State historic
preservation grants. Other grants, also requiring listing, may be available through other public and private
sources.
Properties that meet the criteria for registers listing receive a measure of protection from state and federal
undertakings regardless of their listing status. State and federal agencies must consult with the SHPO to
avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to listed or eligible properties.
Will State and National Registers listing restrict the use of a property? If you are not using federal or
state funds to complete your project (e.g. a grant or tax credit, CD funds, a Main Street Grant) and you do not
require a state or federal permit to undertake it (e.g. DEC permit), you are free to remodel, alter, paint,
manage, subdivide, sell, or even demolish a National or State Register listed property (as long as you comply
with local zoning). If state or federal funds are used or if a state or federal permit is required, proposed
alterations may be reviewed by SHPO staff if the property is either listed or determined eligible for listing.
What kinds of properties can be included in the registers? Buildings and structures such as
residences, churches, commercial buildings and bridges; sites such as cemeteries, landscapes and
archaeological sites; districts, including groups of buildings, structures or sites that are significant as a whole,
such as farmsteads, residential neighborhoods, industrial complexes and cultural landscapes; and objects,
such as fountains and monuments.
What is a historic district? A historic district is a group of buildings, structures, and sites that are
significant for their historical and physical relationships to each other. Properties in districts are not usually
significant individually but gain meaning from their proximity and association with each other. A district may
include any number of properties.
What is the process for listing a property on the registers? To begin, an application must be
submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for evaluation. If the property is determined eligible
for listing, the nomination sponsor is responsible for providing documentation that describes the property’s
setting and physical characteristics, documents its history, conveys its significance in terms of its historic
context, and demonstrates how it meets the register criteria. The New York State Board for Historic
Preservation reviews completed nominations. If the board recommends the nomination, the New York State
Historic Preservation Officer (Commissioner of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation) lists
the property on the State Register and forwards it to the National Park Service for review and listing on the
National Register.
How can an owner get a State and National Registers plaque to display on his or her building?
Although the SHPO does not provide plaques, a list of manufacturers is available upon request.
How does listing protect a building and its surroundings? The registers are a valuable tool in the
planning of publicly funded, licensed or permitted projects. Government agencies are responsible for avoiding
or reducing the effects of projects on properties that are eligible for or listed on the registers. Listing raises
awareness of the significance of properties, helping to ensure that preservation issues are considered early
and effectively in the planning process.
How do I find out if my building is already listed? Check out the SHPO’s online database, the Cultural
Resource Information System (CRIS), which is on our website here: https://cris.parks.ny.gov. Here, you can
enter as a guest, hit the “Search” button at the top of the page, and search with the address, name of the
property, or search by zooming into the map. Your building may not already be listed, but we may have some
preliminary information already in CRIS. For more guidance, contact your National Register Unit
representative.
Where can I find out more about the State and National Registers? Contact the Division for Historic
Preservation at (518) 237-8643, visit our website at https://parks.ny.gov/shpo/national-register/
or see the National Park Service website at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/index.htm.