PLAGIARISM SCAN REPORT

Words 997 Date August 15,2020

Characters 6127 Exclude Url

0% 100% 0 46
Plagiarism Unique Plagiarized Unique Sentences
Sentences
Content Checked For Plagiarism

Vikas Govalkar, et. al. (2014) performed a study on the bare frame and compares it with the infilled frame having a different
position of the shear wall. The plan geometry of the building is rectangular having planned of 15m x 9m. The structure is G+ 9
storeys tall with 4 m of ground floor height and 3m of all other floors height. Analyses of seismic forces has been performed
as per Indian code IS 1893 (part-1) 2002 for each model using STADD Pro V8i. Wind load calculation is done as per IS 875. To
acknowledge the effect of shear wall in the bare frame and infilled frame, for that total 8 models are developed. Kiran Kamath
et al., (2015) studied the behaviour of concentric steel braced frame structure using pushover analysis. In their work, a 2- bay
2D steel frame structure with 1-bay X braced frame, 2-bays X braced frame and structure without bracing with different aspect
ratios have been modelled and analyzed using software ETABS. Linear static and pushover analysis is done on the entire
prototype for seismic loads defined as per IS 1893-2002 (Part-I) using ETABS. The pushover analysis provides a vast idea into
the structural aspects, which controls the performance of structure during earthquakes. Prof. Prakash Sangave, et. al. (2015)
presented their study based on a comparison between the three-dimensional models of steel & RCC structure which are
analyzed by using the seismic analysis equivalent static load method provided in IS 1893: (2002) with the help of software
ETABS. They also done designing and cost estimation which is carried out using MS-Excel programming for all structures. They
did analysis on a typical plan of building of RCC and steel structure having plan dimensions 22.5m X 12m with G+6 and G+10
storey height. They analyzed the seismic forces in zone V with hard soil condition having importance factor 1. Ghalimath A.G.
et. al. (2015) applied a static analysis procedure over the exiting design of an RC bare frame and frame with infill and dual
system. In order to evaluate the performances of their models, the static analysis for seismic analysis of the existing structure
is performed. After performing the analysis they acknowledge the parameters like natural period, base shear, displacement,
axial force and bending moments in column required. They concluded that an infill plays a major role in the seismic evaluation
of RC buildings. It is being observed that by placing shear wall, axial force & bending moment in column get decreases.
MohdAtifet. al. (2015) researched on comparison of earthquake analysis of G+15 building provided with bracings and shear
wall. The building is analyzed in all the seismic zones define as IS 1893-2002. The analyzed structure is of same in geometry in
along length and width and is ofG+15 storey, Ordinary RC moment-resting frame (OMRF). The structure is modelled in tool
STAAD.pro V8i software. Time period of the structure in both the direction is retrieving as per IS 1893(part 1):2002 seismic
analysis has undergone. The Lateral seismic forces over the RC frame are carried out using a linear equivalent static method
as per IS 1893(part 1): 2002 for different earthquake zones. The objective of present study is to understand that the structure
needs to have suitable an Earthquake resisting features to safely resist large seismic forces that are generated on them
during an Earthquake. Shear walls are quite efficient in terms of cost construction and in reducing distortion due to
earthquake in structure. It is also been observed that the braced frames can dissipate a great degree of energy exerted by the
earthquake. The performance results and the analysis of the prototype are then graphically shown and also the data in
tabular form and then it is used for comparison for determining the best performance of structure against the seismic forces.
Dharanya et.al. (2017) worked on the topic comparison study of shear wall and bracings under seismic loading in a multi-
storey residential building in which they analyzed a G+4soft storey structure which consists of cross-bracing and shear wall,
the plan area of a structure are 381 m2, the building have 3m of each storey height. The analysis of structure Modelled are
done using analysis tool Etabs, considering dead, live and seismic loads as per Indian Standards and conducted equivalent
static load method the study done for the seismic zone V only. Janakkumar M. Mehta et.al.,(2017) presented a comparative
study on tall structures of (G+17) storey building was analyzed with different shear-wall configuration. They modelled to
examine the effect of seismic parameters like base shear, lateral displacements, lateral drifts and model time period on the
structure for the zone-V in medium soil as specified in IS:1893-2002. The plan is for the building is 25m x 25m with a total of 18
structure for the zone-V in medium soil as specified in IS:1893-2002. The plan is for the building is 25m x 25m with a total of 18
storeys having typical storey height of 3.5m. They provided the shear wall at a different location on the structure and
compared them. Nikhil Sahu, Anubhav Rai (2017)their study is based on a Comparative study of three different cases of
framed structures of Bare frame structure, Open ground storey frame structure and structure with infill walls in the alternate
storey are considered for comparison of different parameters like Spectral Acceleration with time, Spectral Displacement with
time, Spectral Acceleration with Spectral Displacement (Capacity Curve). The graphs of each results have been plotted and
have been compared. The results have been found to be quiet interesting for the frame open ground story to give better
results than the other two. Sumitsharma, et. al., (2018) studied the effect of seismic forces on the structure using different
software. In their study, the base shear, time period and storey displacement is evaluated by using the tool STAAD and Etabs
software and they compared results which obtained are compared with IS1893 and they have done the analysis on the
building having plan areas 20mx20m and the height of each storey is 3m situated in zone IV. The analysis is done by
considering the factor of medium soil and using SMRF type building.

Sources Similarity