Professional Documents
Culture Documents
METHODS
F ocused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) aims to gather essential
time-sensitive information to diagnose pericardial effusion,
global cardiac function, and relative chamber size in symptomatic
Study Design
patients.1 Core FoCUS applications are considered a minimum This was a cross-sectional, observational study performed to
standard for emergency medicine,2 competency training, and pro- evaluate a quality improvement initiative in our PED. The ini-
gram accreditation.2,3 In 2013, consensus educational guidelines tiative met established criteria for a clinical quality improve-
were developed for focused cardiovascular applications pertinent ment project and was exempt from review by our institutional
to pediatric emergency medicine (PEM).4 The 2015 American review board.
Academy of Pediatrics policy statement and technical report
affirmed the importance of adequate training for PEM programs
in point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS).5,6 Setting and Study Population
We performed this project in an urban PED with roughly
35,000 annual patient visits at an academic tertiary care children's
From the *Pediatric Emergency Medicine, †Pediatric Cardiology, Yale School
of Medicine, Yale University; and ‡Yale New Haven Children's Hospital,
hospital between January 2016 and December 2016. Comparison
New Haven, CT. data before FoCUS protocol adoption were obtained from January
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest. 2015 to December 2015. We evaluated data from a convenience
Reprints: Antonio Riera, MD, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale School of sample of PED patients up to 21 years old who underwent FoCUS
Medicine, Yale University, 100 York St, Suite 1F, New Haven, CT 06511
(e‐mail: antonio.riera@yale.edu).
at the discretion of treating physicians. Eligibility and inclusion
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. criteria were delineated in our FoCUS protocol document. No
ISSN: 0749-5161 exclusion criteria were defined.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com 191
FoCUS Protocol requested that consultation with the primary service occurs before
a FoCUS was performed. Information cards were provided to
Our protocol specified definitions, indications, image acqui- families. The cards explained the limited scope of the FoCUS
sition guidelines, interpretation expectations, and information re- examination goals, that the study was not billable to insurers, and
lated to quality assurance measures. It was prepared by the lead that a follow-up echocardiogram could be necessary.
investigator (PEM physician and director of the POCUS program)
and reviewed by the chief of pediatric cardiology. Consensus on Physician-Sonographer Training
indications was achieved by these 2 individuals. The protocol
was disseminated via email to both PEM and emergency medicine Participating PEM fellows received an introductory FoCUS
(EM) residency programs and made accessible online, and a copy didactic lecture and hands-on training early in their first fellow-
was kept in our PED. ship year. This was supplemented with dedicated FoCUS instruc-
Focused cardiac ultrasound indications included the follow- tion at a regional PEM and critical care POCUS conference in
ing: (1) patients with undifferentiated shock, (2) patients with September. Participation in a 4-week ultrasound rotation with
cardiopulmonary arrest and return of spontaneous circulation, our EM program is structured to occur during the early stages of
(3) patients with concern for a pericardial effusion (examples their second fellowship year. Participating EM residents have
provided), (4) patients with concern for a pulmonary embolus, integrated FoCUS education throughout training and frequently
(5) patients with unexplained dyspnea, and (6) patients with perform these scans on adult patients. Participating PEM attend-
exertional syncope. ings, when performing a FoCUS alone, had prior formal training
A complete FoCUS included the following views: (1) a experiences with FoCUS. When a FoCUS was performed by a
parasternal long axis (PSLA), (2) a parasternal short axis (PSSA) trainee, a PEM attending was present on shift to provide supervision.
at the papillary muscle level, (3) an apical 4-chamber (A4C), and The amount of POCUS experience and proficiency by supervis-
(4) a subxyphoid inferior vena cava (IVC) seen entering the right ing PEM attendings, however, was heterogeneous.
atrium in long axis. A reference document available to the sonog-
raphers had pictures with examples of each view, the correct probe Sonography and Cine Clip Reviews
positioning, and a corresponding image as it should appear on Focused cardiac ultrasounds were performed using the
the monitor. phased-array S4-2 transducer (4–2 MHz) of a Philips Sparq ultra-
The protocol described how quality control and oversight sound system (Philips, Bothell, Wash). Grayscale 2-dimensional
would be maintained. Any concern for an abnormal finding on images were obtained. Cine clip recordings were preset at 3 seconds.
FoCUS triggered consultation with pediatric cardiology. A com- Acquired clips were uploaded to a secure POCUS workflow server
prehensive echocardiogram was performed at the discretion of where physicians could document their FoCUS interpretations
the consultant. For stable established cardiology patients, it was using a templated worksheet. All studies were reviewed by a
192 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
pediatric cardiologist who was blinded to physician-sonographer interval [CI], 12–611), and the negative LR was 0 (95% CI,
findings. A brief clinical history that included the patient's age, 0.01–1.20). For depressed function, FoCUS had a positive LR of
sex, pertinent physical examination findings, and the FoCUS indi- 86 (95% CI, 12–604), and the negative LR was 0 (95% CI,
cation was provided. 0.01–1.05). For chamber size abnormalities, FoCUS had a posi-
tive LR of 22 (95% CI, 8–60), and the negative LR was 0 (95%
Data Analysis CI, 0.01–1.09). Overall test characteristics and subgroup analysis
Physician-sonographer FoCUS assessments at the time of the of cases with follow-up echocardiograms are shown in Table 2.
patient care encounter were compared with pediatric cardiologist Adequate cine clips (80%) were most commonly recorded on
interpretation of the recorded cine clips. The cardiologist's assess- the PSLA view (91%), whereas limited clips (20%) were most
ment for effusion, global function, and chamber size abnormali- commonly recorded on the A4C view (40%). Cine clip categoriza-
ties was defined as our reference standard. Interpretation of the tion by view is provided in Table 3. The interrater reliability of clip
3 main components of FoCUS were dichotomized as follows: categorization as either adequate or limited between POCUS di-
(1) a pericardial effusion was present or absent, (2) the qualitative rector, and pediatric cardiologist was very good (κ = 0.90; 95%
left ventricular function was normal or depressed, and (3) the rel- CI, 0.71–1.0) with 95% agreement.
ative chamber sizes were normal or abnormal. Test characteristics A shift in the median number of FoCUS performed by month
and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated. These calculations from 1 to 5 was observed. This is calculated based on 8 sequential
were performed using an online MedCalc statistical software.12,13 data points (January 2016 to August 2016), all above the baseline
Each recorded PSLA, PSSA, and A4C video clip was inde- median from the preceding year in 2015 (Fig. 2). When compared
pendently inspected by the lead investigator and classified as with the previous year, an improvement in the median rate of
adequate or limited. Cine clips were classified as adequate when adequate cine clips obtained by month was observed from
all 3 of the following criteria were met: (1) the anatomy was re- 0% to 55%. Improvements were observed across each cardiac
corded in the orientation outlined by the reference document; view. The median adequate PSLA improved from 0% to 100%
(2) the depth setting maximized and centered key structures on (Fig. 3). The median adequate PSSA improved from 0% to
the monitor; and (3) the gain level used did not create cine clips 80% (Fig. 4). The median adequate A4C improved from 0%
that were too bright or too dark. A subset of cine clips was
rated in this same fashion by our study's pediatric cardiologist.
The interrater reliability of this assessment was tested with TABLE 1. Demographic Data
Cohen's κ coefficient.
Study Population N = 92
Quality Improvement Measures
FoCUS indications
To improve FoCUS utilization in our PED, we aimed to
Concern for pericardial effusion 46 (50%)
double the number of scans performed over the course of
12 months compared with the previous year. An additional goal Unexplained dyspnea 21 (23%)
was to increase the overall quality of cine clips obtained by Concern for pulmonary embolus 11 (12%)
physician-sonographers. A structured improvement roadmap Undifferentiated shock 8 (9%)
was developed (Fig. 1). Interventions leveraged towards these Cardiopulmonary arrest* 2 (2%)
aims included “buy-in” from pediatric cardiology, process stan- Exertional syncope 1 (1%)
dardization for trainees, timely review of cases with ongoing feed- Other (eg, vasovagal syncope) 3 (3%)
back, and accessibility to the FoCUS protocol document. Baseline Sex of patient
parameters were established by review of cine clips stored in our Male 49 (53%)
POCUS server from January to December 2015. Documentation Female 43 (47%)
of physician-sonographer FoCUS assessments during 2015 was
Age of patient
not consistently available to allow for comparison of cine clip
interpretation test characteristics before and after the protocol 0–2 mo 3 (3%)
roll-out. Metrics tracked throughout the implementation period 2–12 mo 3 (3%)
included FoCUS compliance with protocol indications and adher- 1–3 y 6 (7%)
ence to image acquisition guidelines. Medical record review was 4–12 y 20 (22%)
performed to track cardiology consultations, echocardiogram re- 13–21 y 60 (65%)
sults, and patient disposition and ensure that appropriate follow- Physician-sonographer level of training
up care was obtained. Performance on key quality measures was EM-1 4 (4%)
tracked using run charts, and standard run chart rules were applied EM-2 24 (26%)
to demonstrate improvement.14 EM-3 11 (12%)
EM-4 4 (4%)
RESULTS PEM-1 12 (13%)
Ninety-two FoCUS examinations performed by 34 different PEM-2 18 (20%)
physicians were evaluated during our 1-year study period. Demo- PEM-3 13 (14%)
graphic information is listed in Table 1. The prevalence of abnor-
PEM attending 6 (7%)
mal findings on FoCUS was 18.5%. There were 13 patients with
abnormal findings on FoCUS. These consisted of 5 cases of peri- Preexisting heart condition
cardial effusion (5.4%), 6 cases of depressed function (6.5%), and Yes 12 (13%)
6 cases of chamber size abnormalities (6.5%). In 2 patients, the No 80 (87%)
FoCUS concurrently revealed a pericardial effusion, depressed *Patients evaluated for cardiac standstill with a single view during
function, and a chamber size abnormality. For detection of pericar- cardiopulmonary resuscitation were not analyzed.
dial effusion, FoCUS had a positive LR of 87 (95% confidence
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 193
TABLE 2. Overall Performance of FoCUS and Comparison With 24-Hour Follow-up Echocardiogram
to 50% (Fig. 5). These improvements over time were evident using A complete FoCUS with 3 cardiac views plus IVC assessment
standard run chart rules. occurred 61% of the time. Findings were documented by the
Overall adherence to protocol indications was high at 97%. physician-sonographer before the end of shift in 92% of cases.
Protocol deviations included a 16-year-old female with vasova- In all 7 cases with documentation omissions, the physician-
gal syncope, a 15-year-old female with costochondritis, and a sonographer was contacted by the lead investigator and cine clip
10-year-old girl with a murmur and a fixed split S2 on heart ex- interpretations were recorded before review by our pediatric cardi-
amination. This latter patient had been referred to our PED to ologist. Patients with preexisting heart conditions included cases
get intravenous fluid therapy for gastroenteritis symptoms. The of patent ductus arteriosus, mitral valve insufficiency, pulmonary
FoCUS revealed a markedly enlarged right ventricle and sug- valve insufficiency, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, heart transplant,
gested that an atrial septal defect was present. The findings sub- hypoplastic left heart syndrome after surgical palliation, and 2 cases
sequently led to cardiology consultation, and the diagnosis was each of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy,
confirmed with an echocardiogram performed as an outpatient. and tetralogy of Fallot after surgical repair. Cardiology consulta-
tion was performed in 52% of cases when a FoCUS was per-
formed. Follow-up echocardiograms performed within 24 hours
TABLE 3. Assessment of FoCUS Completeness and Cine Clip occurred 25% of the time and the admission rate for patients that
Adequacy received a FoCUS was 39%.
PSLA Window N = 92
Adequate 84 (91%) DISCUSSION
Limited 8 (23%) After the implementation of a FoCUS protocol that was
Omitted 0 collaboratively derived, physicians in our PED were observed
PSSA Window N = 89 to satisfactorily perform FoCUS studies and provide useful
Adequate 77 (87%) real-time interpretations. This adds to the existing body of litera-
Limited 12 (13%)
ture that has shown that focused pediatric echocardiography can
be accurately performed and interpreted by emergency physicians
Omitted 3
after receiving dedicated training.10,11,15 Our findings are unique
A4C Window N = 82 in that we did not evaluate the performance10,11,15 of individually
Adequate 49 (60%) trained physician-sonographers but rather the global training
Limited 33 (40%) received as part of the PEM fellow and EM residency
Omitted 10 POCUS curriculums.
IVC Window N = 65 In our study, FoCUS exhibited high specificity for the diag-
Adequate 54 (83%) nosis of pericardial effusion and depressed global function, with
Limited 11 (17%) narrow confidence intervals, making it an excellent test to rule in
Omitted 27 these conditions. Physician-sonographer assessment of chamber
size abnormalities exhibited similar performance, except for a
194 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
FIGURE 2. Number of FoCUS performed by month before and after protocol implementation.
notably lower positive predictive value. This finding coincides chambers can be compared in relation to one another.16 Obtaining
with the lowest adequate quality designation (60%) associated adequate A4C views may be a more operator-dependent as-
with the A4C view. The A4C is typically considered the most use- sessment that depends on patient positioning and the physician-
ful window to make chamber size determinations, as all 4 cardiac sonographer's level of skill and experience.
FIGURE 3. Parasternal long axis quality by month before and after protocol implementation.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 195
FIGURE 4. Parasternal short axis quality by month before and after protocol implementation.
FIGURE 5. Apical 4-chamber quality by month before and after protocol implementation.
196 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Findings related to protocol adherence will help inform Our study has several limitations. Individual goal-directed
future directions for our program. At the outset, we hoped that training before protocol roll-out was not done. The protocol was
setting indications for appropriate use would reach a concilia- integrated with regular clinical activities, and awareness of the
tory balance between clinical care needs and trainee education. practice change was raised at the outset. Our patient population
We planned to create appropriate indications so that patients was mainly adolescents with normal anatomy. There were few
with concerning cardiac complaints were candidates for FoCUS. cases of children younger than 12 months or with preexisting car-
Performing FoCUS when symptoms and physical examination were diac disease included for analysis, making our study findings less
consistent with more benign causes like gastroesophageal reflux, generalizable to infants or children with known congenital heart
costochondritis, and vasovagal syncope could lead to overutilization disease. In addition, we did not track cases where patients that
of resources and unnecessary testing. When our protocol was met FoCUS eligibility criteria did not have scans performed. We
applied to a 1-year convenience sample, the prevalence of abnor- also did not assess whether technical difficulties led to incomplete
mal findings was 18.5%. At this rate of pathology, the developed or aborted FoCUS scans. We acknowledge that our FoCUS
protocol indications seemed to generate an appropriate level of pathway may have impacted resource utilization, and we did not
FoCUS utilization. measure balancing metrics for its potential impact on interven-
A few poignant cases where our FoCUS pathway led to im- tions or costs. Review of annual trends with our pediatric cardiol-
proved patient care and staff education warrant further discussion. ogy division, however, did not reveal any measurable increase in
The first case was that of a 4-year old Nigerian girl who presented echocardiograms, PED consultation requests, or admissions.
with dyspnea. The parents reported cough, grunting noises, and Our test characteristic findings should be interpreted with
difficulty sleeping. At triage, the patient was categorized as a caution. The reference standard used was pediatric cardiologist
“work of breather,” and a nebulizer treatment was requested. On interpretation of a PEM or EM physician-sonographer FoCUS.
physical examination, she was found to have mild tachypnea, a Test characteristics may have been different if we had compared
heart murmur, lung crackles, and wheezing. Focused cardiac ultra- physician-sonographer FoCUS with a study obtained by a certified
sound performed 8 minutes after her triage found a pericardial echocardiogram technician or pediatric cardiologist. The wide
effusion, qualitatively depressed left ventricular function, a dilated sensitivity confidence intervals reflect the relatively low number
right atrium, and a plethoric IVC, as interpreted by the treating of positive findings. Of the 5 patients diagnosed with a pericardial
team. Pediatric cardiology was consulted immediately and subse- effusion, 1 had this finding on a prior echocardiogram. Of the
quently diagnosed mitral valve insufficiency secondary to rheumatic 6 patients diagnosed with depressed function, 3 had this finding
heart disease. The second case was a 13-year-old female with on a prior echocardiogram. Of the 6 patients diagnosed with
longstanding chest pain. She was transferred to our PED with a di- chamber size abnormalities, 3 had this finding on a prior echocar-
agnosis of pericarditis and a low voltage electrocardiogram. Her diogram. Physician-sonographer knowledge of these prior results
vital signs consisted of a fever to 38.1°C, a heart rate of 95 beats through our electronic medical record system could have biased
per minute, and a blood pressure of 107/47. On physical examination, their FoCUS interpretation. For FoCUS negative patients discharged
heart sounds were described as “muffled.” A FoCUS performed from our PED, medical record review did not reveal any missed
immediately after arrival revealed a large pericardial effusion as cases of pathology based on a subsequent ED visit or hospitaliza-
interpreted by the treating team. Pediatric cardiology and the tion at our same institution.
intensive care unit were notified immediately. She subsequently We did not assess the accuracy of physician-sonographer
underwent sedated pericardiocentesis, which aspirated close to evaluation of the IVC. Several methods have been described to es-
1 L of blood. This was felt to have been caused by an indolent timate volume status based on IVC measurements. Pediatric studies
accumulation of fluid after blunt trauma during a cheerleading have included different patient populations, transducer orientations,
injury several months before presentation. Finally, we report the modes of measurement, and locations where the IVC diameter was
case of a 2-week old who had a FoCUS performed after a cyanotic measured.17–20 Given this heterogeneity in the literature, we felt that
spell attributed as a possible brief resolved unexplained event. The a reliable reference standard measurement was more difficult to
FoCUS was interpreted by the treating team as having no signifi- define and would add to the complexity of the FoCUS protocol.
cant or abnormal findings. During the review session, our pediat- Because of these issues related to measurement certainty and
ric cardiologist pointed out the appearance of air bubbles seen in additional training requirements, we did not compare physician-
the left atrium on the PSLA view. The infant was getting a normal sonographer assessment with pediatric cardiologist interpretation
saline bolus at the time the FoCUS was performed. The patient of IVC volume status. We encouraged IVC assessment, however,
was found to have a small secundum atrial septal defect on echo- as this is an important POCUS skill to learn and considered
cardiogram. This layer of expertise allowed us to review our de- part of the focused cardiovascular assessment in consensus
partmental protocols and perform reeducation related to filtering educational guidelines.4
intravenous lines in patients with congenital heart disease.
Goals for future improvement were identified. The first was
to attain a higher rate of complete FoCUS evaluations. Analysis CONCLUSIONS
of monthly trends over time did not reveal any improvement with We report the collaborative development and successful imple-
this metric. The omission of IVC windows may suggest either a mentation of a FoCUS protocol in a PED. Physician-sonographer
lack of familiarity or comfort level with this POCUS application. interpretation of FoCUS yielded acceptable results. Improvement
A second area was to increase the rate of adequate cine clip archiv- in FoCUS utilization and cine clip adequacy was observed.
ing, especially for the A4C view. One key driver for this process Pediatric emergency department programs should consider
may be hands-on instruction during clinical shifts. Dedicated collaborative implementation of FoCUS protocols tailored to
POCUS scanning shifts with real-time mentorship may increase trainee, patient care, and institutional needs.
the number of adequate scans. When real-time guidance is not
possible, timely cine clip review and feedback for physician-
sonographers are advisable. This quality assurance step ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
should identify individual areas for improving subsequent The authors thank Alan H. Friedman, MD, Professor of
FoCUS assessments. Pediatrics (Cardiology) and Chief of Pediatric Cardiology at
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 197
Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital, for his guidance and 10. Pershad J, Myers S, Plouman C, et al. Bedside limited echocardiography by
support with this project. the emergency physician is accurate during evaluation of the critically ill
patient. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e667–e671.
11. Longjohn M, Wan J, Joshi V, et al. Point-of-care echocardiography by
pediatric emergency physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:693–696.
REFERENCES 12. Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt CE, et al. MedCalc: a new computer
1. Labovitz AJ, Noble VE, Bierig M, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound in program for medical statistics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1995;
the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of 48:257–262.
Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am 13. Software M. Diagnostic Test Evaluation Calculator. Vol 20172017.
Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:1225–1230. Oostende, Belgium: Medcalc. Available at: https://www.medcalc.org/calc/
2. Long E, Oakley E, Duke T, et al., Does respiratory variation in inferior diagnostic_test.php. Accessed November 20, 2017.
vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and 14. Perla RJ, Provost LP, Murray SK. The run chart: a simple analytical tool for
meta-analysis. Shock. 2017;47:550–559. learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:
3. Lewiss RE, Pearl M, Nomura JT, et al. CORD-AEUS: consensus document 46–51.
for the emergency ultrasound milestone project. Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 15. Gaspar HA, Morhy SS, Lianza AC, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound:
20:740–745. a training course for pediatric intensivists and emergency physicians.
4. Vieira RL, Hsu D, Nagler J, et al. Pediatric emergency medicine fellow BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:25.
training in ultrasound: consensus educational guidelines. Acad Emerg Med. 16. Mandavia DP, Hoffner RJ, Mahaney K, et al. Bedside echocardiography
2013;20:300–306. by emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38:377–382.
5. Marin JR, Lewiss RE. Point-of-care ultrasonography by pediatric 17. Chen L, Hsiao A, Langhan M, et al. Use of bedside ultrasound to assess
emergency medicine physicians. Pediatrics. 2015;135:e1113–e1122. degree of dehydration in children with gastroenteritis. Acad Emerg Med.
6. Marin JR, Lewiss RE. Point-of-care ultrasonography by pediatric 2010;17:1042–1047.
emergency physicians. Policy statement. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65: 18. Kathuria N, Ng L, Saul T, et al. The baseline diameter of the inferior
472–478. vena cava measured by sonography increases with age in normovolemic
7. Kessler D, Ng L, Tessaro M, et al. Precision medicine with point-of-care children. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:1091–1096.
ultrasound: the future of personalized pediatric emergency care. Pediatr 19. Levine AC, Shah SP, Umulisa I, et al. Ultrasound assessment of severe
Emerg Care. 2017;33:206–209. dehydration in children with diarrhea and vomiting. Acad Emerg Med.
8. Sivitz A, Nagdev A. Heart failure secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy: 2010;17:1035–1041.
a role for emergency physician bedside ultrasonography. Pediatr Emerg 20. Ng L, Khine H, Taragin BH, et al. Does bedside sonographic measurement
Care. 2012;28:163–166. of the inferior vena cava diameter correlate with central venous pressure in
9. Smith AT, Watnick C, Ferre RM. Cardiac tamponade diagnosed by the assessment of intravascular volume in children? Pediatr Emerg Care.
point-of-care ultrasound. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33:132–134. 2013;29:337–341.
198 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com 199
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, penicillin, cephalosporin, Shock was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of less than
and vaccination. In case of insect, it was subdivided into bee, 60 if the patient was between ages of 0 and 28 days, SBP of less
ant, etc. Food was subdivided into seafood, flour, buckwheat, pupa, than 70 if the patient was between the ages of 1 month and
nut, egg, beef, and milk/dairy product. For additional causes, 12 months, SBP of less than 70+ (age 2) if the patient was be-
exercise-induced, food-dependent exercise-induced, and idio- tween the ages of 1 year and 10 years, and SBP of less than 90 if
pathic were considered. Clinical characteristics included symp- the patient was older than 10 years.7 Treatment in ED included ox-
tom type, systemic symptom, symptom severity, blood pressure ygen (O2) supply, fluid administration, antihistamine use, steroid
at the time of ED visit, shock, and mental status. Symptom type use, epinephrine use, bronchodilator use, and diagnostic tests.
was defined as uniphasic (if the symptom happened briefly once), For comparison between the urticaria group and the missed
biphasic (if the symptom went away and came back shortly), and anaphylaxis group, univariate analysis was conducted using
protracted (if the symptom persisted for more than 1 day). Sys- χ2 test, Fisher exact test, Mann Whitney U test, and Student
temic symptom was subdivided into cutaneous, respiratory, car- t test. To identify factors affecting missed anaphylaxis, univariate
diovascular, gastrointestinal, and neurologic. Severity of allergic logistic regression analysis was performed. Using factors with
reaction was subdivided into the following 3 categories: mild (1 a P value of less than 0.05 from univariate analysis, multivariate
systemic symptom), moderate (2 or more systemic symptoms), logistic regression analysis was then performed using forward
and severe (shock, mental change, cardiac arrest, or apnea).11 method. For characteristic comparison between the missed
200 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Urticaria Missed Anaphylaxis Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to iden-
(n = 1014) (n = 37) P tify factors affecting missed diagnosis of anaphylaxis in pediatric
Drug, % 46 (4.5) 3 (8.1) 0.246 urticaria patients at ED. Significant factors included past food
NSAIDs 7 (0.7) 1 (2.7) 0.250 allergy history, seafood, egg and milk as cause of allergy, heart
Penicillin 8 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 1.000
rate per minute, respiratory symptom, gastrointestinal symptom,
O2 supply, fluid administration, antihistamine use, steroid use,
Cephalosporin 6 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 1.000
epinephrine use, bronchodilator use, and diagnostic tests. After
Vaccine 6 (0.6) 1 (2.7) 0.222 excluding factors that might distort results because of too wide
Insect sting, % 6 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 1.000 confidence interval such as respiratory symptom, gastrointestinal
Food, % 237 (23.4) 31 (83.8) 0.000 symptom, and bronchodilator use, multivariate logistic regression
Seafood 44 (4.3) 5 (13.5) 0.025 analysis was performed using the rest of significant factors from
Wheat 24 (2.4) 1 (2.7) 0.596 univariate logistic regression analysis. Factors associated with
Buckwheat 1 (0.1) 1 (2.7) 0.069 missed diagnosis of anaphylaxis in pediatric urticaria patients
Pupa 1 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 1.000 were the following: past allergy history, seafood, egg and milk
Nut 11 (1.1) 1 (2.7) 0.351 as the cause of allergy, treatment with fluid administration, steroid,
Egg 36 (3.6) 4 (10.8) 0.048
and epinephrine. The odds ratio in case of antihistamine use was
0.198 (Table 4).
Pork 21 (2.1) 0 (0.0) 1.000
There was no difference in age or sex between the anaphy-
Cow milk 58 (5.7) 14 (37.8) 0.000 laxis group and the missed anaphylaxis group. However, an atopic
Idiopathic, % 489 (48.2) 3 (8.1) history was higher in the anaphylaxis group. Cardiovascular
NSAID indicates nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. symptom was more common in the anaphylaxis group, where-
as gastrointestinal symptom was more common in the missed
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 201
202 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
This study only included patients who visited ED. Patients 8. Sclar DA, Lieberman PL. Anaphylaxis: underdiagnosed, underreported,
who visited outpatient department and those who had self-limiting and undertreated. Am J Med. 2014;127:S1–S5.
symptoms were not included in this study. Moreover, this study 9. Bohlke K, Davis RL, DeStefano F, et al. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis
was conducted in only 1 training hospital. The quality for registra- among children and adolescents enrolled in a health maintenance
tion of disease classification codes was not validated before. organization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:536–542.
Therefore, results of this study could not be generalized. Another 10. Simons FE, Ardusso LR, Bilò MB, et al. World allergy organization
limitation was that a high ratio of idiopathic cause of both urticaria guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis. World
and missed anaphylaxis group due to retrospective chart review. Allergy Organ J. 2011;4:13–37.
11. Brown SG. Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. J Allergy
CONCLUSIONS Clin Immunol. 2004;114:371–376.
Of all pediatric urticaria patients, 3.5% of patients were not
12. Roh EJ, Chung EH, Lee MH, et al. Clinical features of anaphylaxis in
registered as anaphylaxis although they had anaphylaxis symp-
the middle area of south korea. Pediatr Allergy Respir Dis. 2008;18:
toms. Missed diagnosis of anaphylaxis in pediatric urticaria
61–69.
patients at ED were associated with a history of food allergy with
milk, egg, and seafood as causes of allergy, treated with fluid 13. Simons FE, Sampson HA. Anaphylaxis epidemic: fact or fiction? J Allergy
administration, steroid use, and epinephrine use. Consideration Clin Immunol. 2008;122:1166–1168.
for whether the diagnosis of anaphylaxis is missed in pediatric 14. Lee S. IgE-mediated food allergies in children: prevalence, triggers, and
urticaria patients is necessary to obtain accurate prevalence data management. Korean J Pediatr. 2017;60:99–105.
of pediatric anaphylaxis. 15. Lee SY, Ahn K, Kim J, et al. A multicenter retrospective case study of
anaphylaxis triggers by age in korean children. Allergy Asthma Immunol
REFERENCES Res. 2016;8:535–540.
1. Winbery SL, Lieberman PL. Histamine and antihistamines in anaphylaxis. 16. Kvenshagen B, Halvorsen R, Jacobsen M. Adverse reactions to milk in
Clin Allergy Immunol. 2002;17:287–317. infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97:196–200.
2. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Bock SA, et al. Symposium on the 17. Eigenmann PA. Anaphylaxis to cow's milk and beef meat proteins.
definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report. J Allergy Clin Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002;89:61–64.
Immunol. 2005;115:584–591.
18. Benhamou AH, Schappi Tempia MG, Belli DC, et al. An overview of
3. Huang F, Chawla K, Jarvinen KM, et al. Anaphylaxis in a New York City cow's milk allergy in children. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139:300–307.
pediatric emergency department: triggers, treatments, and outcomes.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:162–168.e161–e163. 19. Lucas A, Brooke OG, Cole TJ, et al. Food and drug reactions, wheezing,
and eczema in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65:411–415.
4. Alvarez-Perea A, Ameiro B, Morales C, et al. Anaphylaxis in the pediatric
emergency department: analysis of 133 cases after an allergy workup. 20. Teymourpour P, Pourpak Z, Fazlollahi MR, et al. Cow's milk anaphylaxis
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017. in children first report of Iranian Food Allergy Registry. Iran J Allergy
Asthma Immunol. 2012;11:29–36.
5. Wood RA, Camargo CA Jr, Lieberman P, et al. Anaphylaxis in America:
the prevalence and characteristics of anaphylaxis in the United States. 21. Teymourpour P, Shokouhi R, Fazlollahi MR, et al. Factors affecting the
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:461–467. severity of cow's milk anaphylaxis. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol.
2013;12:190–191.
6. Wright CD, Longjohn M, Lieberman PL, et al. An analysis of anaphylaxis
cases at a single pediatric emergency department during a 1-year period. 22. Baalmann DV, Hagan JB, Li JT, et al. Appropriateness of epinephrine
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;118:461–464. use in ED patients with anaphylaxis. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:
7. Simons FE, Ardusso LR, Dimov V, et al. World allergy organization 174–179.
anaphylaxis guidelines: 2013 update of the evidence base. Int Arch Allergy 23. Stang AS, Straus SE, Crotts J, et al. Quality indicators for high acuity
Immunol. 2013;162:193–204. pediatric conditions. Pediatrics. 2013;132:752–762.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 203
204 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
or blood pressure below the fifth percentile for age with prolonged
capillary refill, decreased peripheral pulse, or tachycardia) requiring TABLE 1. Initial Characteristics of the Patients Upon Admission
in the ED (N = 31)
inotropic support, (3) coagulopathy with prothrombin time
(international normalized ratio, ≥1.5), and (4) seizures or
n (%) or
altered consciousness.
Characteristics Median (IQR)
Data Analysis Age, y 6.53 (1.35–13.24)
The following patient data were collected: (1) general charac- Males 13/31 (41.9%)
teristics (age and sex); (2) presenting signs (body temperature, periph- Presenting symptoms with fever
eral oxygen saturation, blood pressure, pulse rate, splenomegaly, and Abdominal discomfort 23/31 (74.2%)
conscious state) and symptoms (fever, abdominal distension or pain, Abdominal distension (<3 y) 11/12 (91.7%)
rash, enlarged lymph node, generalized pain, and seizure) in the ED; Abdominal pain (≥3 y) 10/19 (52.6%)
(3) initial laboratory data in the ED (hemoglobin, triglyceride, fibrin- Rash 11/31 (35.5%)
ogen, ferritin, and albumin level; blood leukocyte, neutrophil, and Enlarged lymph node 9/31 (29.0%)
platelet count; and prothrombin time); and (4) supportive care
Generalized pain 4/31 (12.9%)
provided in the ED (oxygen supplementation or inotropic sup-
port), transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) from ED, and sur- 5 Findings included in the HLH-2004
diagnostic criteria
vival after initial therapy for HLH. The 5 signs and symptoms
included in the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria were as follows: fe- Fever 30/31 (96.8%)
ver, splenomegaly, bicytopenia, hyperferritinemia, and hypertri- Splenomegaly 23/31 (74.2%)
glyceridemia and/or hypofibrinogenemia.5 Each number of Peripheral blood cytopenia 13/31 (41.9%)
clinical findings that met the criteria was considered. (affecting ≥2 of 3 lineages)
Data were presented as percentage or median with interquar- Hemoglobin <9 g/dL 7/31 (22.6%)
tile range (IQR). The K-sample median test was used to compare Neutrophils <1000/μL 9/31 (29.0%)
the continuous variables of the clinically unstable and stable Platelets <100,000/μL 25/31 (80.6%)
groups. Risk factor analysis of the clinically unstable group was Hypertriglyceridemia and/or 21/31 (67.7%)
conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression hypofibrinogenemia
models (forward method). P < 0.05 was considered statistically Triglycerides >265 mg/dL 13/31 (41.9%)
significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Fibrinogen <150 mg/dL 19/31 (61.3%)
software 20.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). Ferritin >500 μg/L 30/31 (96.8%)
RESULTS No. findings satisfying the diagnostic criteria 4 (3–5)
≤3 findings 12/31 (38.7%)
Initial Characteristics of Pediatric Patients With 4 findings 11/31 (35.5%)
HLH Upon Admission in the ED 5 findings 8/31 (25.8%)
Clinically unstable group 19/31 (61.3%)
We enrolled 31 pediatric patients with HLH with a median
age of 6.53 years (IQR, 1.35–13.24 years). The initial characteris- Hypoxia and oxygen supplement 12/31 (38.7%)
tics of patients upon admission in the ED included the presenting Hypotension requiring inotropic support 6/31 (19.4%)
symptoms and findings included in the HLH-2004 diagnostic Coagulopathy with prothrombin time (INR) ≥1.5 11/31 (35.5%)
criteria (Table 1). Seizure or altered consciousness 4/31 (12.9%)
First, all patients (96.8%) except 1 had fever, and the median Admission to intensive care unit 14/31 (45.2%)
days of fever before admission in the ED visit was 7 days Directly from ED 12/31 (38.7%)
(IQR, 5–8 days). Abdominal discomfort with fever (74.2%) During hospitalization 2/31 (6.5%)
was the common presenting symptom of patients upon admission Expired during initial therapy for HLH 3/31 (9.7%)
in the ED. Abdominal discomfort was characterized by abdominal
pain or distension. Abdominal distension was specifically com- INR indicates international normalized ratio.
mon in patients younger than 3 years (11/12), whereas abdominal
pain was common in patients 3 years and younger (10/19). In
addition, rash (35.5%) or enlarged lymph nodes (29.0%) patients (45.2%) were eventually treated in ICU, and 3 patients
were observed. (9.7%) from the clinically unstable group died during the initial
With regard to the 5 signs and symptoms included in the therapy for HLH in the ED (Table 1).
HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria, fever (96.8%), hyperferritinemia Clinical and laboratory findings of the clinically unstable
(96.8%), splenomegaly (74.2%), hypertriglyceridemia and/or group (19 patients, 61.3%) and the stable group (12 patients,
hypofibrinogenemia (67.7%), and bicytopenia (41.9%) were 38.7%) were compared (Table 2). The clinically unstable group
observed. Only 8 patients (25.8%) presented with the all the had significantly lower albumin (2.3 vs 3.3 g/dL, P = 0.002) and
signs and symptoms upon admission in the ED, whereas most fibrinogen levels and higher ferritin level and neutrophil count
of the patients did not. than the clinically stable group. However, the duration of fever be-
fore admission to ED, hemoglobin and triglyceride levels, and
Clinical Severity of Patients Upon Admission in the platelet count were not significant. The number of clinical find-
ED and Risk Factor Analysis ings that met the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria between the 2
In total, 19 patients (61.3%) were classified in the clinically groups was not significantly different.
unstable group. Although the patients in this group presented with Risk factor analysis of the clinically unstable group was per-
multiorgan system deterioration, hypoxia was the most common formed using the variables that were different between the clini-
cause (12/19), followed by coagulopathy (11/19). Fourteen cally unstable and stable groups (Table 3). Lower albumin level
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 205
was a significant risk factor for the clinically unstable group (odds defining the clinical severity of patients upon admission in the
ratio, 0.040; P = 0.004). Multivariate logistic regression analysis ED. In this study, most of the patients (74.2%) presented with less
(forward method) showed the same results because the variables than 5 signs and symptoms and did not meet the criteria upon ad-
other than albumin were not statistically significant in the mission in the ED. This result could be explained by the fact that
univariate analysis. the criteria contain tests that are difficult to conduct in the ED.
Moreover, patients may present with incomplete clinical features
DISCUSSION but are already in the early stage of HLH. Furthermore, the num-
ber of clinical findings that met the criteria was not different be-
This study investigated pediatric patients with HLH based on
tween the clinically unstable and stable groups, indicating that
the perspective of emergency physicians and demonstrated several
the use of the criteria did not help in identifying the clinical sever-
significant results. First, abdominal discomfort (74.2%) with fever
ity of the condition. Therefore, other effective tools for diagnosing
was the most common presenting symptom of patients admitted in
HLH or defining its clinical severity, such as a recently developed
the ED. Second, only 25.8% of the patients admitted in the ED met
scoring system referred to as HScore,10 should be used and its va-
the HLH diagnostic criteria, and this was not related to clinical
lidity in the ED settings must be investigated.
severity. Third, majority of the patients (61.3%) were clinically
Pediatric patients with HLH should be judiciously monitored
unstable upon admission in the ED, and lower albumin level
and managed because their condition often progresses to
could have been a risk factor.
multiorgan failure.1 We defined the clinically unstable group
Regarding the initial symptoms of pediatric patients with
using the criteria based on the deterioration of organ systems af-
HLH upon admission in the ED, abdominal discomfort is com-
fected by HLH. Our results showed that more than half of the pe-
mon, which may be related to hepatosplenomegaly. This symp-
diatric patients with HLH (61.3%) had clinically unstable
tom, which is a result of direct organ infiltration by the activated
conditions, particularly due to hypoxia (38.7%), during admis-
immune cells, is a cardinal sign of HLH2,6 and is more frequently
sion in the ED. Deteriorating pulmonary functions during admission
observed in pediatric patients.3,7 A previous HLH-94 study of
in the ED may indicate acute respiratory distress-like syndrome due
249 pediatric patients reported that hepatomegaly was observed
to HLH or may be a result of combined respiratory infections. Simi-
in 95% of these patients,8 and a multicenter study conducted in
larly, a previous study on adult patients with HLH showed that pul-
China showed that hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were ob-
monary involvement was frequent (42%), although its definition
served in 86.0% and 73.7% of their 323 pediatric patients with
included common symptoms, such cough, dyspnea, and respiratory
HLH, respectively.9 In our study, abdominal distension was prom-
failure. The laboratory findings of the clinically unstable group (neu-
inent in patients younger than 3 years having relatively small
trophil count and fibrinogen, ferritin, and albumin levels) were differ-
intra-abdominal space, whereas abdominal pain was frequent in
ent from those of the clinically stable group, and lower albumin level
patients 3 years and younger who could adequately express pain.
was considered as a significant risk factor in the clinically unstable
Although the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria are commonly
group. Data on the factors associated with the clinical severity of
used in clinical practice, the use of the number of clinical findings
HLH among patients admitted in the ED are not available. Mean-
from the criteria may be inadequate in diagnosing HLH or
while, a recent study of 116 pediatric patients with HLH patients re-
ported that hypoalbuminemia (≤2.0 g/dL) upon diagnosis was one of
the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality.11 Hypoalbumin-
TABLE 3. Risk Factor Analysis of the Clinically Unstable Group emia is also observed in individuals with other diseases, including
liver diseases, which may result from a decrease in albumin synthe-
Variables OR (95% CI) P sis or increase in catabolism by IL-6 and other inflammatory cyto-
Neutrophils, 103/μL 1.678 (0.996–2.828) 0.052
kines.12 Excessive cytokine production is the main pathogenesis in
HLH, and this is considered as the cause of multiorgan failure and
Fibrinogen, mg/dL 0.991 (0.982–1.001) 0.065
mortality.2,13 Therefore, lower albumin level in the clinically unsta-
Ferritin, 103 μg/L 1.110 (0.992–1.241) 0.069 ble group may be related to hypercytokinemia and could be used as
Albumin, g/dL 0.040 (0.005–0.352) 0.004 an indicator of the clinical severity of pediatric HLH.
OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. The present study has several limitations. This study had a
retrospective design and a relatively small number of patients from
206 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
a single institution and ethnic group. Thus, this limits the general- 5. Henter JI, Horne A, Aricó M, et al. HLH-2004: Diagnostic and therapeutic
izability of the study. There may be more patients with HLH who guidelines for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Pediatr Blood
were not diagnosed in the ED or even during hospitalization, and Cancer. 2007;48:124–131.
some patients could have died before a confirmative diagnosis 6. Ost A, Nilsson-Ardnor S, Henter JI. Autopsy findings in 27 children
was made. In addition, this study did not include specific treat- with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Histopathology. 1998;32:
ment outcomes, and genetic analysis was not conducted. Further 310–316.
studies must be conducted to overcome these limitations. 7. Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P, Lopez-Guillermo A, et al. Adult
In conclusion, pediatric patients with HLH usually present haemophagocytic syndrome. Lancet. 2014;383:1503–1516.
with abdominal discomfort and fever and are often in clinically
8. Trottestam H, Horne A, Arico M, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy for
unstable conditions upon admission in the ED. However, only
hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: long-term results of the
few patients meet the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria. Lower albu-
HLH-94 treatment protocol. Blood. 2011;118:4577–4584.
min level may be used in identifying clinically unstable patients
and preparing for possible clinical deterioration. 9. Xu XJ, Wang HS, Ju XL, et al. Clinical presentation and outcome of
pediatric patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in
REFERENCES China: a retrospective multicenter study. Pediatr Blood Cancer.
2017;64.
1. Filipovich A, McClain K, Grom A. Histiocytic disorders: recent insights
into pathophysiology and practical guidelines. Biol Blood Marrow 10. Fardet L, Galicier L, Lambotte O, et al. Development and validation of
Transplant. 2010;16:S82–S89. the HScore, a score for the diagnosis of reactive hemophagocytic
syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:2613–2620.
2. Janka GE, Lehmberg K. Hemophagocytic syndromes—an update. Blood
Rev. 2014;28:135–142. 11. Bin Q, Gao JH, Luo JM. Prognostic factors of early outcome in pediatric
hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: an analysis of 116 cases.
3. Machowicz R, Janka G, Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W. Similar but not the same:
Ann Hematol. 2016;95:1411–1418.
differential diagnosis of HLH and sepsis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;
114:1–12. 12. Arroyo V, Garcia-Martinez R, Salvatella X. Human serum albumin,
systemic inflammation, and cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2014;61:396–407.
4. Ryu JM, Kim KM, Oh SH, et al. Differential clinical characteristics of acute
liver failure caused by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in children. 13. Henter JI, Elinder G, Soder O, et al. Hypercytokinemia in familial
Pediatr Int. 2013;55:748–752. hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Blood. 1991;78:2918–2922.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 207
208 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of DTS acquisition. The patient is supine on the table, and the detector is placed under the patient. The
x-ray tube moves in a cranial-to-caudal direction. Multiple exposures are taken. Depending on the projection, different objects at different
depths are projected onto different parts of the detector. These detector images can then be postprocessed to emphasize different depths
by adding the images with different degrees of relative shift.
initial frontal scout image to set up coverage area and then a was obtained was then independently interpreted by 3 reviewers: a
single linear sweep of the x-ray tube over the table and detector. pediatric radiologist with experience in DTS image interpretation,
Sixty low-dose exposures are taken over the sweep. These pro- a radiologic technologist with experience in DTS image interpre-
jections are then reconstructed into 25 coronal slices (Fig. 1). tation, and a fourth-year radiology resident who was reviewing
Our patients were imaged supine for comfort and to minimize DTS images for the first time. The images were reviewed on a
motion. All patients were instructed to breath-hold during PACS workstation (Inteleviewer 4-14-1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada).
image acquisition. Reviewers were blinded to clinical and esophagram results.
Esophagram procedures were performed and interpreted by For each patient, each reviewer determined whether the DTS
1 of 24 board-certified pediatric radiologists. In each study, the images showed a radiolucent esophageal FB (yes/no). Chest
esophagus was evaluated in 2 orthogonal planes after oral barium DTS results were defined as the consensus of at least 2 of the
administration. Esophagram was performed less than 30 minutes 3 reviewers regarding whether a radiolucent FB was present in
following performance of the chest DTS study. Following the esophagus. Each consensus review was compared with reports
esophagram, patients were admitted to the hospital or discharged from the subsequent esophagram.
from the ED, as per clinical determination.
Clinical Impression
Image Review Consensus chest DTS reviews were also compared with clin-
We identified patients who underwent chest DTS for evalua- ical impression. For patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal
tion of possible esophageal impaction of a radiolucent FB through endoscopy, the clinical impression was determined by whether an
use of a radiology information system. Each chest DTS image that esophageal FB was noted in the procedure note. For patients who
TABLE 1. Patient Characteristics, Chief Complaint, Esophagram Dose, and Clinical Course and Discharge Diagnosis of the
17 Patients Who Underwent DTS Scout Prior to Esophagram Examination
Patient ID Age, y Sex Chief Complaint Esophagram Dose, mGy Clinical Course and Discharge Diagnosis
1 10 F Poor food tolerance 5.72 Passed PO challenge, no FB
2 10 M Sensation of food stuck 1.12 Food spontaneously passed
3 14 F Sensation of food stuck 3.5 Food pushed down during scope
4 13 M Sensation of food stuck 2.13 Food pushed down during scope
5 3 M Swallowed button 0.2 Patient vomited FB
6 15 M Cannot keep down liquids 3.1 Meat bolus stuck in esophagus
7 4 F History of TEF; solids intolerance 0.47 Removed food bolus by scope
8 10 F Sensation of food stuck N/A Impacted esophageal food bolus
9 13 M Choked on food N/A Negative scope, no food bolus
10 12 M Choked on food 1.48 Food bolus passed
11 15 F Sensation of food stuck 1.05 Chest pain not related to food bolus
12 14 M Globus sensation 3.51 Vomited food bolus
13 17 M Sensation of food stuck 0.6 No food bolus
14 17 M Sensation of food stuck 1.41 Scope removed food bolus
15 15 F Problems swallowing 4.7 Gastric ulcer, no food bolus
16 13 F Problems swallowing after eating corn dog 1.01 Esophageal reflux, no food bolus
17 16 M Sensation of food stuck 3.89 Food bolus impaction
F indicates female; M, male; PO, by mouth; TEF, tracheoesophageal fistula.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 209
RESULTS
TABLE 2. Comparison of Patients With and Without Diagnosis
of FB
Patient Population
Patient Characteristic No FB (n = 5) FB (n = 12) P We performed 17 chest DTS studies from January 1, 2014,
through June 30, 2016 (Table 1). There were 10 boys and 7 girls
Age, y 14.0 ± 2.65 11.75 ± 4.39 0.31
ranging in age from 3 to 17 years. The groups with and without
Sex, % male 20 75 0.10 an esophageal FB were similar in age and sex but did have differ-
Scoped, % of total 0 58.3 0.03 ent rates of endoscopy (Table 2).
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
Chest DTS and Esophagram Images
Chest DTS images were of high diagnostic quality with no
motion or movement artifacts in all 17 patients. In our search
did not undergo endoscopy, we instead used the discharge diagno- through the medical records, we did not find any instances of exam-
sis from the inpatient stay or ED visit. inations being aborted because of technical difficulties associated
with the equipment or patient cooperation. Figure 2 shows sample
images from a chest DTS and a conventional esophagram in a pa-
Statistical Analysis tient with an impacted food bolus at the gastroesophageal junction.
Descriptive statistics are reported as means ± SD for con- Chest DTS Versus Esophagram
tinuous variables and frequency with percentage for categorical Consensus reviews (Table 3) of 4 of the 17 chest DTS images
variables. Sensitivity and specificity for chest DTS consensus were suggestive of the presence of radiolucent esophageal FBs
were compared with esophagram and with each patient's clinical and of no FBs in the remaining 13 patients. All 3 chest DTS re-
impression. We report 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the viewers were in accordance in their review of 11 of the 17
performance characteristics of DTS. DTS images.
FIGURE 2. A, Chest DTS images from a 17-year-old male adolescent who presented the ED with a chief complaint of sensation of food
stuck in throat. A food bolus at the gastroesophageal junction was shown as a soft tissue density that was outlined by adjacent air on the DTS
image (arrow). B, Esophagram images show the food bolus as a filling defect in the barium column on the conventional esophagram (arrow).
Shortly after the esophagram was performed, the patient vomited a chicken nugget. No endoscopy was performed.
210 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
TABLE 3. Blinded Image Interpretation by 3 Readers for Identification of FB in Comparison to Clinical Impression and Esophagram
Endoscopy Clinical Esophagram Chest DTS Chest DTS Chest DTS Chest DTS
Patient ID Performed Impression Result Consensus Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Reviewer 3
1* No 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 No 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 Yes 1 1 0 0 0 1
4 Yes 1 1 0 1 0 0
5* Yes 1 1 1 1 0 1
6 No 1 1 0 0 0 1
7* Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 Yes 1 1 0 1 0 0
9 Yes 1 1 0 0 0 0
10 No 1 0 0 0 0 1
11* No 0 0 0 0 0 0
12* No 1 1 1 1 1 1
13* No 0 0 0 0 0 0
14* Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1
15* No 0 0 0 0 0 0
16* No 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 No 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 = FB believed present; 0 = no FB believed present.
*Cases where at least 2 of 3 DTS readers agreed with both esophagram and clinical impression.
Esophagrams of 9 of the 17 patients suggested the presence the presence of a radiolucent esophageal FB, there is sufficient ev-
of radiolucent esophageal FBs. Compared with esophagram, con- idence that the FB is indeed present, suggesting there is little
sensus chest DTS had a sensitivity of 44% (95% CI, 15%–77%), additional benefit from continuing with the esophagram. A
specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 60%–100%), pos- positive chest DTS then is sufficient evidence to consider pro-
itive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 40%–100%), and negative ceeding to esophagoscopy.
predictive value of 62% (95% CI, 35%–85%). Third, the modest sensitivity and negative predictive values
of chest DTS suggest that a negative chest DTS does not effec-
Chest DTS Versus Clinical Impression tively rule out the presence of a radiolucent esophageal FB. When
Forty-seven percent (8/17) of patients underwent upper gas- chest DTS is substituted for conventional scout radiograph before
trointestinalendoscopy. Endoscopy wasperformed10.7 ± 7.8 hours an esophagram in cases where there is high suspicion for the
(mean ± SD, n = 7) after the radiographic studies. All 7 patients presence of a radiolucent esophageal FB, continuing with the
(100%) who underwent endoscopy were found to have an esoph- esophagram may add important additional diagnostic information.
ageal FB. Five patients were diagnosed with an esophageal FB
as a discharge diagnosis without endoscopy. Five patients were Limitations
discharged with an alternative diagnosis. Although these data are promising, they should be consid-
Compared with clinical impression, consensus chest DTS ered preliminary because of limitations of this study. We had
had a sensitivity of 33% (95% CI, 11%–65%), specificity of relatively low patient numbers and therefore wide 95% CIs. The
100% (95% CI, 46%–100%), positive predictive value of 100% study was performed at a single center. The pediatric radiologist
(95% CI, 40%–100%), and negative predictive value of 38% and radiologic technologist who interpreted chest DTS images
(95% CI, 15%–68%). have more experience interpreting DTS images than is typical
for most radiologists, although the senior radiology resident phy-
sician interpreter had no special experience in this area. Finally,
DISCUSSION our determination of clinical impression was based on a retrospec-
Results from this pilot study suggest 3 important conclu- tive review of clinical record, in cases with negative esophagram.
sions. First, chest DTS was able to detect radiolucent esophageal In those patients, there was often a lag between the radiology and
FBs in several patients. This suggests that further study of the role endoscopy, so an FB could have passed in that time. Spontaneous
of DTS, including in the pediatric population, is warranted. This passage of esophageal FBs has frequently been described.8 Also,
would include more precisely determining populations and situa- many of the discharge diagnoses were presumptive diagnoses
tions in which this modality is most efficacious, informing defin- based on clinical presentation.
itive cost-benefit calculations.
Second, the very high specificity and positive predictive
values of chest DTS, compared both with esophagram and clinical CONCLUSIONS
impression, suggest that chest DTS could be an effective substi- This pilot study showed that chest DTS has very high speci-
tute for conventional scout radiograph before an esophagram in ficity and positive predictive value, compared with esophagram
cases where there is high suspicion for the presence of a radiolu- and clinical impression, in detecting radiolucent esophageal FBs
cent esophageal FB, especially food. When chest DTS suggests in children, making chest DTS a promising modality for ruling
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 211
in the presence of a radiolucent esophageal FB. Our pilot study 2. Little DC, Shah SR, St Peter SD, et al. Esophageal foreign bodies in the
with 17 patients indicates that a chest DTS result indicating the pediatric population: our first 500 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:914–918.
presence of radiolucent esophageal FB could be an effective substi- 3. Lao J, Bostwick HE, Berezin S. Esophageal food impaction in children.
tute for esophagram. Further, chest DTS does not require radiolo- Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003;19:402–407.
gist participation, and the average radiation dose is less than that 4. Dobbins JT, McAdams HP. Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and
of conventional esophagram. However, its lower sensitivity and clinical update. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:244–251.
negative predictive values make chest DTS less effective at ruling
5. Vult von Steyern K, Bjorkman-Burtscher IM, Weber L, et al. Effective dose
out the presence of a radiolucent esophageal FB in children. More from chest tomosynthesis in children. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014;158:
studies are needed to better elucidate the role of chest DTS in the 290–298.
management of children with possible radiolucent esophageal FBs.
6. Jung HN, Chung MJ, Koo JH, et al. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest: utility
for detection of lung metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. Clin
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Radiol. 2012;67:232–238.
The authors thank the Children's Mercy Medical Writing
7. Vult von Steyern K, Bjorkman-Burtscher IM, Hoglund P, et al. Description
Center for assisting in manuscript preparation.
and validation of a scoring system for tomosynthesis in pulmonary cystic
fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2718–2728.
REFERENCES 8. Conners GP, Chamberlain JM, Ochsenschlager DW. Symptoms and
1. Wyllie R. Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Pediatr. spontaneous passage of esophageal coins. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;
2006;18:563–564. 149:36–39.
212 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com 213
Harper et al Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
12 months or because the referring emergency department (ED) can occur with instrumented deliveries24,25 and the length of time
physician had a concern for child abuse or neglect. As part of for a birth skull fracture to heal is unpublished), date of presenta-
the consultation for head injury, the child abuse program tion to the ED and consultation with child abuse physician, fall
completed safety education and psychosocial assessments as history, fall height, floor surface, location of skull fracture
well as comprehensive consultations by child abuse physicians if (calvarial), type of fracture (simple vs complex), associated soft
indicated. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) younger than tissue swelling on clinical examination and radiography, type of
24 months, (2) identified skull fracture(s), (3) caregiver provided radiologic study completed, and radiologic findings on follow-up
a history of recent head trauma, (4) known time of injury, (5) no skull radiographs. A simple skull fracture was defined as single
additional fractures on skeletal survey, and (6) completion of and linear, whereas complex fractures were defined as being
follow-up skull radiographs. multiple, bilateral, diastatic, depressed, or stellate.26 The pres-
Radiologic imaging at the time of ED presentation was at the ence or absence and resolution of skull fractures were based on
discretion of the ED physician with all children initially imaged by the official reading of pediatric radiologists. Complete healing
head computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional (3D) recon- of the skull fracture was defined as resolution of the fracture lu-
struction. Other radiologic studies ordered at the time of initial cency by skull radiograph. Fracture length and width during
presentation included skull radiographs (before head CT) and follow-up imaging were not measured. A child abuse physician
skeletal surveys (after identification of a skull fracture) in some reviewed all imaging with the pediatric radiologists at the time
children. The need for additional follow-up imaging was deter- of the initial consultation and follow-up. Timing of radiographi-
mined clinically, for example, to evaluate for leptomeningeal cyst cally demonstrated fracture resolution was determined in weeks.
formation as recommended by neurosurgery. Follow-up imaging The time interval between initial injury and the fracture resolution
included 2 view skull radiographs (frontal and lateral) offered at on skull radiograph was rounded to the nearest week. Descriptive
2 to 3 weeks (in conjunction with a follow-up skeletal survey) statistics were used in analysis.
and several months after initial injury. Follow-up skeletal surveys
still included skull radiographs as the timing of this study overlap-
ped the American College of Radiology recommendation for RESULTS
elimination of skull radiographs from the follow-up skeletal sur- After reviewing data on 106 children evaluated by the child
vey.23 Follow-up skeletal surveys were recommended but not re- abuse program between January 1, 2008, and December 31,
quired in infants younger than 1 year with isolated skull 2012, 26 children were eligible for inclusion in the study.
fractures at the time of this study. Accidental head injury was de- Figure 1 shows the study subject flow chart. The median age of
fined as a child presenting with a history of witnessed accidental the children was 7 months with a range of 0 to 18 months. The
injury (such as a fall) occurring in the absence of additional con- study population was 80.8% Hispanic, consistent with the popula-
cerning injuries such as nonscalp cutaneous trauma (bruising), tion of the region, and 46.2% of the children were male. Most chil-
oral trauma, or skeletal injury. dren (69.2%) were born by vaginal delivery without instrumentation
Data that were extracted included the child's age in months, (Table 1). A child abuse physician evaluated 50% of the children
sex, ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic), race, maternal age, in- within 24 hours and 69.2% within 48 hours of injury. The remain-
strumentation used, and mode of delivery (as rarely skull fractures der were seen more than 48 hours after injury as the discovery of
214 www.pec-online.com © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 Skull Fracture Healing in Young Children
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. www.pec-online.com 215
Harper et al Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
fractures in children, determining a window of injury may be help- be feasible to design a study of fracture healing using ultrasonog-
ful in cases where the history is unclear, the history includes mul- raphy as information continues to accrue on this technique for
tiple falls or injury events, or when multiple fractures are present. skull fracture identification in the pediatric population.29,30
This study provides some initial data to aid in that process. Al-
though most children in this case series had scalp swelling at the
time of presentation supporting a recent injury, soft tissue swelling CONCLUSIONS
was not present in all children. There were children without frac- Healing or radiographic resolution of a skull fracture in
ture resolution at follow-up visits between 9 and 18 weeks after in- young children can take months. In this retrospective chart review,
jury. In those children that did demonstrate healing, fracture those skull fractures with follow-up imaging demonstrated radio-
resolution largely occurred 10 or more weeks after injury. There- graphic resolution at or after 10 weeks. Emergency medicine phy-
fore, a skull fracture that presents without soft tissue swelling sicians and multidisciplinary teams should be aware of the high
may be a recent injury or may represent a prior head injury event. variability in skull fracture presentation and the large window to
In addition, with the large window to fracture resolution, unexplained skull fracture resolution when children younger than 24 months
or multiple skull fractures in children younger than 24 months present with unexplained or multiple skull fractures.
may be the result of a single or multiple events of head trauma.
This study used a child abuse program database for data ex-
traction. Every child received a multidisciplinary evaluation by the REFERENCES
child abuse program team including psychosocial assessment and 1. Niederkrotenthaler T, Xu L, Parks SE, et al. Descriptive factors of abusive
additional medical evaluation including skeletal survey and neu- head trauma in young children-United States, 2000-2009. Child Abuse
roimaging with 3D head CT in all children. This study has limita- Negl. 2013;37:446–455.
tions as the population included in this study is a subset of the
2. Leventhal JM, Martin KD, Gaither JR. Using US data to estimate the
pediatric population with skull fractures, which represents a risk
incidence of serious physical abuse in children. Pediatrics. 2012;129:
for selection bias. These children were referred to the child abuse 458–464.
physician either because they were infants younger than 12 months
and sustained a skull fracture, or the referring ED physician had a 3. Leventhal JM, Martin KD, Asnes AG. Fractures and traumatic brain
suspicion for nonaccidental head trauma in a child older than injuries: abuse versus accidents in a US database of hospitalized children.
Pediatrics. 2010;126:e104–e115.
12 months. This suspicion for nonaccidental trauma by the ED phy-
sician may have been based on the examination findings such as ab- 4. Ibrahim NG, Wood J, Margulies SS, et al. Influence of age and fall type on
sence of scalp swelling, presence of additional bruises, presence of head injuries in infants and toddlers. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2012;30:201–206.
a complex skull fracture, or psychosocial risk factors such as prior 5. Hughes J, Maguire S, Jones M, et al. Biomechanical characteristics of head
involvement with child protective services. Despite the initial con- injuries from falls in children younger than 48 months. Arch Dis Child.
cern for nonaccidental head trauma in some referrals, all of the chil- 2016;101:310–315.
dren in the study had a history of witnessed accidental injury (such 6. Kemp AM, Dunstan F, Harrison S, et al. Patterns of skeletal fractures in
as a fall) occurring in the absence of additional concerning injuries child abuse: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;337:a1518.
such as nonscalp cutaneous trauma or skeletal injury. The study 7. Billmire ME, Myers PA. Serious head injury in infants: accident or abuse?
population is small because not all children with skull fractures pre- Pediatrics. 1985;75:340–342.
senting to the ED were referred to the child abuse program for a
8. Meservy CJ, Towbin R, McLaurin RL, et al. Radiographic characteristics of
multidisciplinary evaluation, and not all children who were referred
skull fractures resulting from child abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:
were eligible as they did not complete follow-up imaging.
173–175.
The study has other limitations such as the timing of
follow-up radiographs was not standardized. Therefore, follow-up 9. Duhaime AC, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ, et al. Head injury in very young
intervals varied between patients and were dependent on caregiver children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100
availability. A study designed with more frequent follow-up inter- hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics. 1992;
90(2 pt 1):179–185.
vals may allow identification of the timing of fracture resolution
more precisely as fractures may have resolved earlier than 10 weeks 10. Leventhal JM, Gaither JR. Incidence of serious injuries due to physical
(between 3 and 9 weeks) or later than 18 weeks. Finally, initial abuse in the United States: 1997 to 2009. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e847–e852.
fracture length or separation was not measured in this study and 11. Adamsbaum C, Grabar S, Mejean N, et al. Abusive head trauma: judicial
may also affect the timing of fracture resolution. admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics. 2010;126:
A final limitation of this study is that both physicians and 546–555.
caregivers may have expressed concern regarding radiation expo- 12. Chadwick DL, Chin S, Salerno C, et al. Deaths from falls in children: how
sure reducing follow-up imaging. In general, the use of radiation far is fatal? J Trauma. 1991;31:1353–1355.
in pediatric patients should be judicious. Radiation should not 13. Kleinman PK, Spevak MR. Soft tissue swelling and acute skull fractures.
be an overriding concern in skeletal surveys given the overall es- J Pediatr. 1992;121(5 pt 1):737–739.
timated low cumulative dose of 0.2 mSv.27 Using the data pro-
14. Metz JB, Otjen JP, Perez FA, et al. Fracture-associated bruising and
vided by Berger et al,27 the individual effective dose of an AP
soft tissue swelling in young children with skull fractures: how sensitive
skull radiograph is 0.005 mSv (55 kVp and 2 mAs), and the effec-
are they to fracture presence? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020, Publish Ahead
tive dose of a lateral skull radiograph is 0.008 mSv (60 kVp and of Print.
2.5 mAs). Thus, the cumulative dose of a 2-view skull is
0.013 mSv. In comparison, the yearly average absorbed dose from 15. Halliday KE, Broderick NJ, Somers JM, et al. Dating fractures in infants.
the American Nuclear Society is estimated at 6.2 mSv per person Clin Radiol. 2011;66:1049–1054.
per year or a daily dose of 0.017 mSv.28 Although a future study 16. Islam O, Soboleski D, Symons S, et al. Development and duration of
with standardized imaging intervals and a larger number of sub- radiographic signs of bone healing in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
jects could provide more precise information on the resolution 2000;175:75–78.
of skull fractures, it may also be difficult because of the concern 17. Malone CA, Sauer NJ, Fenton TW. A radiographic assessment of pediatric
for cumulative radiation exposure from repeated imaging. It may fracture healing and time since injury. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:1123–1130.
216 www.pec-online.com © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 Skull Fracture Healing in Young Children
18. Prosser I, Lawson Z, Evans A, et al. A timetable for the radiologic features 25. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Dupont C, et al. Comparison of “instrument-associated”
of fracture healing in young children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198: and “spontaneous” obstetric depressed skull fractures in a cohort of 68
1014–1020. neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:165–170.
19. Yeo LI, Reed MH. Staging of healing of femoral fractures in children. 26. Kleinman PK (ed). Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse. 3rd ed.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1994;45:16–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
20. Shopfner CE. Periosteal bone growth in normal infants. A preliminary 27. Berger RP, Panigrahy A, Gottschalk S, et al. Effective radiation dose in a
report. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1966;97:154–163. skeletal survey performed for suspected child abuse. J Pediatr. 2016;171:
21. Walters MM, Forbes PW, Buonom C, et al. Healing patterns of clavicular 310–312.
birth injuries as a guide to fracture dating in cases of possible infant abuse. 28. American Nuclear Society. Radiation Dose Calculator. Available at: http://
Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:1224–1229. www.ans.org/pi/resources/dosechart/msv.php. Accessed May 8, 2017.
22. Marx RE. Bone and bone graft healing. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North 29. Rabiner JE, Friedman LM, Khine H, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care
Am. 2007;19:455–466, v. ultrasound for diagnosis of skull fractures in children. Pediatrics. 2013;131:
23. Meyer JS, Gunderman R, Coley BD, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) e1757–e1764.
on suspected physical abuse-child. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:87–94. 30. Parri N, Crosby BJ, Mills L, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound for the diagnosis
24. Hughes CA, Harley EH, Milmoe G, et al. Birth trauma in the head and of skull fractures in children younger than two years of age. J Pediatr. 2018;
neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:193–199. 196:230–236.e2.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. www.pec-online.com 217
CME REVIEW ARTICLE
218 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
hives.7,10 Common precipitating allergens include foods, medica- the onset of symptoms in the first decade of life, ~37% in the sec-
tions, pollen, dander, and insect stings.10 ond decade, and the final ~11% sometime thereafter.25 There is
Bradykinin-mediated angioedema results from activation of equal predilection for males and females (Table 1).21
the contact activation system,11–13 which is a complex cascade Pediatric patients diagnosed with HAE C1-INH often mani-
regulated by C1-INH with substrates including Factor XII, high- fest symptomatic attacks requiring acute treatment from puberty
molecular-weight kininogen, prekallikrein, and kallikrein.8 Absence down to as early as 6 months of age.17,27 Diagnosis is frequently
of C1-INH results in an increased production of bradykinin, which delayed because many patients receive repeated treatment of hista-
binds to vascular bradykinin B2 receptors, precipitating vasodilation, minergic angioedema.28,29 Earlier onset of symptoms correlates
and extravasation of fluid causing interstitial edema.1,8,11 The with delays in diagnosis and may predict a more severe disease
bradykinin-mediated angioedema types include HAE, angiotensin- phenotype.30
converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)–induced angioedema, and
acquired angioedema, the latter 2 of which are exceedingly rare
CLINICAL CASES
in children.1,9,14 The suspected triggers include stress, trauma, in-
fection, surgery, and medical procedures.14,15 Case 1
In addition to histaminergic angioedema and bradykinin-mediated A 19-month-old girl presented with swelling of her hands
angioedema, non–histamine-/non–bradykinin-mediated angio- and feet and abdominal rash that appeared like “ringworm” to
edema types have been described.16 These include idiopathic her father after amoxicillin treatment for acute otitis media. Her
angioedema and pseudoallergic angioedema (including nonste- examination was notable for being well-appearing with normal vi-
roidal anti-inflammatory drug–induced), which are relatively tal signs and few scattered erythematous blanching macules with
rare in children and adolescents and will not be discussed in central clearing on her abdomen, legs, and inguinal region with
this review.15 swelling of hands and feet bilaterally. A diagnosis of serum sick-
ness like reaction was made. She returned to the emergency depart-
ment (ED) 1 year later with left-hand swelling, and again 3 months
EPIDEMIOLOGY later with a similar rash associated with left hand and ankle swell-
Children and adolescents are affected primarily by type 1 and ing without fever. Swelling with each presentation resolved in 1 to
type 2 HAEs,17–20 with HAE type I accounting for ~85% of cases 3 days. A referral to rheumatology was made, at which time it was
and HAE type II accounting for the remaining ~15%.21–24 The noted that similar episodes occurred 3 to 4 times a year, usually
prevalence of HAE is estimated to affect 1:30,000 to 1:50,000 in- with mild viral-type illnesses. The differential at that time included
dividuals.22,23 In a large case series, the mean ± SD age of symp- drug/viral-induced erythema multiforme minor, serum sickness-like
tom onset was 11.2 ± 7.7 years; approximately 50% experienced reaction and less likely periodic fever syndrome, urticaria vasculitis,
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 219
220 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
testing should be dictated by the patient's clinical presentation. Con- postprocedure swelling. A second dose of on-demand therapy
sultation with an allergist with HAE expertise is recommended. should also be available in the event initial STP is ineffective2,14
Approved
Generic Trade FDA Approval Indication Ages Administration
Plasma-derived C1-INH Berinert (King of Prussia, Penn) Acute attacks, short-term All ages Intravenous
(protein replacement) prophylaxis
Recombinant human C1-INH Ruconest (Leiden, the Netherlands) Acute attacks 13 y and up Intravenous
(protein replacement)
Ecallantide Kalbitor (Lexington, Mass) Acute attacks 12 y and up Subcutaneous
(plasma-kallikrein inhibitor)
Icatibant Firazyr (Lexington, Mass) Acute attacks 18 y and up Subcutaneous
(bradykinin-2 receptor antagonist)
Plasma-derived C1-INH Cinryze (Lexington, Mass) Long-term prophylaxis 6 y and up Intravenous
(protein replacement)
Plasma-derived C1-INH HAEGARDA (King of Prussia, PA) Long-term prophylaxis 12 y and up Subcutaneous
(protein replacement)
Lanadelumab Takhzyro (Lexington, Mass) Long-term Prophylaxis 12 y and up Subcutaneous
(monoclonal antibody inhibitor of plasma
kallikrein)
Adapted from Bennett and Craig.19
C1-INH indicates C1 esterase inhibitor.
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 221
and sedation that allows for intact neuromuscular reflexes and spon- 5. Rosen FS, Pensky J, Donaldson V, et al. Hereditary angioneurotic edema:
taneous ventilation is recommended. Fiber optic nasotracheal intu- two genetic variants. Science. 1965;148:957–958.
bation is considered the criterion standard of care, but video oral 6. Bork K. Hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor activity
tracheal laryngoscopy is an acceptable alternative.42–44 Preparation including hereditary angioedema with coagulation factor XII gene
and use of experienced proceduralists is encouraged to avoid multi- mutations. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006;26:709–724.
ple intubation attempts given the risk of exacerbating airway angio- 7. Kaplan AP, Greaves MW. Angioedema. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:
edema from direct trauma. 373–388; quiz 389-392.
Ensure cessation of offending agents, including exogenous
8. Kaplan AP, Joseph K. Pathogenesis of hereditary angioedema: the role of
estrogens or ACEi therapy, as both can worsen HAE.1 Intestinal
the bradykinin-forming cascade. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2017;37:
attacks may warrant rehydration therapy and pain control. If ED 513–525.
discharge is deemed appropriate, patients should be prescribed re-
fills for their on-demand agent. Referral to an HAE expert is key. 9. Zeerleder S, Levi M. Hereditary and acquired C1-inhibitor-dependent
Admission is indicated for patients who relapse after on-demand angioedema: from pathophysiology to treatment. Ann Med. 2016;48:
256–267.
therapy, or, when there is concern for upper airway closure, pain
control is inadequate, or patients are unable to tolerate oral intake. 10. Langley EW, Gigante J. Anaphylaxis, urticaria, and angioedema. Pediatr
Rev. 2013;34:247–257.
OUTCOMES 11. Curd JG, Prograis LJ Jr., Cochrane CG. Detection of active kallikrein in
induced blister fluids of hereditary angioedema patients. J Exp Med. 1980;
Despite recent advances, diagnostic delay for HAE world- 152:742–747.
wide remains longer than 10 years from onset of the first clinical
symptoms, resulting in inappropriate, ineffective treatment medi- 12. Reshef A, Kidon M, Leibovich I. The story of angioedema: from quincke to
cations.27 Although a lifetime diagnosis, attack frequency and se- bradykinin. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016;51:121–139.
verity can be well controlled with on-demand and preventative 13. Zuraw BL, Christiansen SC. HAE pathophysiology and underlying
therapies. Before effective therapies, up to one-third of patients mechanisms. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016;51:216–229.
died of asphyxiation.45 Despite newer, very effective on-demand 14. Frank MM, Zuraw B, Banerji A, et al. Management of children with
and prophylactic therapies, long-term follow-up is necessary to hereditary angioedema due to c1 inhibitor deficiency. Pediatrics. 2016;
ensure against complications like asphyxiation and death, as pre- 138:e20160575.
vious studies reported a mean ±SD age at asphyxiation of 40.6 15. Bernstein JA, Cremonesi P, Hoffmann TK, et al. Angioedema in the
± 14.3 years (range, 9–78 years).3 Mortality is overall higher in emergency department: a practical guide to differential diagnosis and
undiagnosed patients and patients with psychiatric disorders management. Int J Emerg Med. 2017;10:15.
who are nonadherent with treatment recommendations, with death
16. Bernstein JA, Moellman J. Emerging concepts in the diagnosis and
occurring, on average, 31 years earlier.3 treatment of patients with undifferentiated angioedema. Int J Emerg Med.
2012;5:39.
SUMMARY 17. Nanda MK, Elenburg S, Bernstein JA, et al. Clinical features of pediatric
Hereditary angioedema, a bradykinin-mediated angioedema, hereditary angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3:392–395.
is an underrecognized disease that carries a significant risk of mor- 18. Aabom A, Andersen KE, Fagerberg C, et al. Clinical characteristics and
bidity and mortality. Highly variable natural history of disease, real-life diagnostic approaches in all Danish children with hereditary
symptom overlap with histamine-mediated angioedema, and limita- angioedema. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:55.
tions in timely referral and testing contribute to delayed diagnosis.
19. Bennett G, Craig T. Hereditary angioedema with a focus on the child.
Recent advances in pathophysiologic understanding have spurred Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36:70–73.
the development of several effective on-demand and prophylactic
therapies with improvement of outcomes. Emergency providers 20. Farkas H, Csuka D, Zotter Z, et al. Treatment of attacks with
should be able to distinguish bradykinin-mediated from histamin- plasma-derived C1-inhibitor concentrate in pediatric hereditary
angioedema patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:909–911.
ergic angioedema, initiate appropriate diagnostic workups and
on-demand therapies for acute attacks, and counsel patients and 21. Bowen T, Cicardi M, Farkas H, et al. 2010 International consensus
parents on expected response to therapies and outpatient monitor- algorithm for the diagnosis, therapy and management of hereditary
ing. Arranging consultation with an HAE expert, which is usually angioedema. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2010;6:24.
an allergist and less commonly a hematologist, is critical to ensure 22. Roche O, Blanch A, Caballero T, et al. Hereditary angioedema due to C1
effective outpatient management and follow-up. inhibitor deficiency: patient registry and approach to the prevalence in
Spain. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;94:498–503.
REFERENCES 23. Zanichelli A, Arcoleo F, Barca MP, et al. A nationwide survey of hereditary
angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency in Italy. Orphanet J Rare Dis.
1. Busse PJ, Christiansen SC. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2020;
2015;10:11.
382:1136–1148.
2. Bork K, Hardt J, Staubach-Renz P, et al. Risk of laryngeal edema and facial 24. Zuraw BL. Clinical practice. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2008;
swellings after tooth extraction in patients with hereditary angioedema with 359:1027–1036.
and without prophylaxis with C1 inhibitor concentrate: a retrospective 25. Bork K, Meng G, Staubach P, et al. Hereditary angioedema: new findings
study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112: concerning symptoms, affected organs, and course. Am J Med. 2006;119:
58–64. 267–274.
3. Bork K, Hardt J, Witzke G. Fatal laryngeal attacks and mortality in 26. Pattanaik D, Lieberman JA. Pediatric angioedema. Curr Allergy Asthma
hereditary angioedema due to C1-INH deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Rep. 2017;17:60.
2012;130:692–697. 27. Cancian M, Perego F, Senter R, et al. Pediatric angioedema: essential
4. Bork K, Wulff K, Witzke G, et al. Hereditary angioedema with normal features and preliminary results from the Hereditary Angioedema
C1-INH with versus without specific F12 gene mutations. Allergy. 2015; Global Registry in Italy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020;31(suppl 24):
70:1004–1012. 22–24.
222 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
28. Banerji A, Li Y, Busse P, et al. Hereditary angioedema from the patient's 37. Frank MM. Update on preventive therapy (prophylaxis) of hereditary
perspective: a follow-up patient survey. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2018;39: angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011;32:17–21.
212–223.
38. Lumry W, Manning ME, Hurewitz DS, et al. Nanofiltered C1-esterase
29. Otani IM, Christiansen SC, Busse P, et al. Emergency department inhibitor for the acute management and prevention of hereditary
management of hereditary angioedema attacks: patient perspectives. angioedema attacks due to C1-inhibitor deficiency in children. J Pediatr.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:128–134.e4. 2013;162:1017–1022 e1011–1012.
30. Christiansen SC, Davis DK, Castaldo AJ, et al. Pediatric hereditary 39. Schneider L, Hurewitz D, Wasserman R, et al. C1-INH concentrate for
angioedema: onset, diagnostic delay, and disease severity. Clin Pediatr treatment of acute hereditary angioedema: a pediatric cohort from the I.M.P.
(Phila). 2016;55:935–942. A.C.T. studies. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013;24:54–60.
31. Reshef A, Prematta MJ, Craig TJ. Signs and symptoms preceding acute 40. Jaffe CJ, Atkinson JP, Gelfand JA, et al. Hereditary angioedema: the use of
attacks of hereditary angioedema: results of three recent surveys. Allergy fresh frozen plasma for prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral surgery.
Asthma Proc. 2013;34:261–266. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1975;55:386–393.
32. Kemp JG, Craig TJ. Variability of prodromal signs and symptoms
41. Ishoo E, Shah UK, Grillone GA, et al. Predicting airway risk in
associated with hereditary angioedema attacks: a literature review. Allergy
angioedema: staging system based on presentation. Otolaryngol Head
Asthma Proc. 2009;30:493–499.
Neck Surg. 1999;121:263–268.
33. Shaw KN, Bachur RG. Fleisher & Ludwig's Textbook of Pediatric
42. Driver BE, McGill JW. Emergency department airway management of
Emergency Medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.
severe angioedema: a video review of 45 intubations. Ann Emerg Med.
34. Aygoren-Pursun E, Soteres DF, Nieto-Martinez SA, et al. A randomized 2017;69:635–639.
trial of human C1 inhibitor prophylaxis in children with hereditary
angioedema. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019;30:553–561. 43. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct
laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane
35. Busse PJ, Farkas H, Banerji A, et al. Lanadelumab for the prophylactic Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011136.
treatment of hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency: a review
of preclinical and phase I studies. BioDrugs. 2019;33:33–43. 44. Pandian V, Zhen G, Stanley S, et al. Management of difficult airway among
patients with oropharyngeal angioedema. Laryngoscope. 2019;129:
36. Busse P, Bygum A, Edelman J, et al. Safety of C1-esterase inhibitor in acute
1360–1367.
and prophylactic therapy of hereditary angioedema: findings from the
ongoing international Berinert patient registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol 45. Frank MM, Gelfand JA, Atkinson JP. Hereditary angioedema: the clinical
Pract. 2015;3:213–219. syndrome and its management. Ann Intern Med. 1976;84:580–593.
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 223
CME EXAM
INSTRUCTIONS FOR OBTAINING AMA PRA CATEGORY 1 CREDITSTM
Pediatric Emergency Care includes CME-certified content that is designed to meet the educational needs of its readers. An annual
total of 12 AMA PRA CATEGORY 1 CREDITSTM are available through the twelve 2021 issues of Pediatric Emergency Care. This activity
is available for credit through March 31, 2023. The CME activity is now available online. Please visit http://CME.LWW.com for more
information about this educational offering and to complete the CME activity.
CME EXAMINATION
APRIL 2021
Please mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET.
Recognition, Evaluation, and Management of Pediatric Hereditary Angioedema, Krack et al
1. A 6-year-old boy presents with his fifth episode of lip and tongue ventilation. While preparing for additional airway manage-
swelling. Family history is notable for a mother with HAE type 1. ment, administration of what is the next best step?
Physical examination is notable for a patent airway without stri- a. IM epinephrine
dor or dyspnea but mild lip, tongue, and right arm edema and a b. Plasma-derived C1-INH replacement protein (Berinert)
clustering of serpiginous, nonpruritic, erythematous lesions with c. FFP
pale centers and rounded margins on the left hip. What patho- d. Plasma-derived C1-INH replacement protein (HAEGARDA)
physiologic derangement is most likely in this patient?
a. Bradykinin deficiency 4. A 9-year-old boy with type II HAE presents to the ED with
b. IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation crown-root fractures of teeth E & F. The on-call dental resident
c. Factor XII deficiency is recommending extraction in the ED. What medication is in-
d. Functional C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency dicated before extraction?
a. FFP immediately before extraction
2. A 3-year-old girl presents with acute onset of severe abdominal b. Berinert at least 1 to 2 hours before extraction
pain, this being the fourth similar episode in the last 12 months c. HAEGARDA at least 2 hours before extraction
without any clear etiology despite extensive workup—you sus- d. Lanadelumab (Takhzyro) immediately before extraction
pect HAE. What ED screening test is indicated?
a. Serum C4 5. A 12-year-old girl with type I HAE presents with stridor after
b. Serum tryptase having received Berinert 3 hours ago. A repeat dose of Berinert
c. Serum C1q is given, but she develops dyspnea and hypercapnea after
d. Genetic sequencing of SERPING1 30 minutes. What is the best next step in airway management?
a. Supraglottic device place with ETCO2 monitoring
3. A 16-year-old girl with a known history of HAE-C1-INH pre- b. Immediate RSI
sents with 18 hours of progressive facial and pharyngeal swell- c. Await response from second dose of Berinert
ing and dyspnea, which is temporized with CPAP via BVM d. Awake fiber optic nasotracheal intubation
224 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Specialty ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. A B C D
2. A B C D
3. A B C D
4. A B C D
Your completion of this activity includes evaluating them. Please respond to the following questions below.
Please rate this activity (1 - minimally, 5 - completely) 1 2 3 4 5
Was effective in meeting the educational objectives
Was appropriately evidence-based
Was relevant to my practice
Please rate your ability to achieve the following objectives, both before this activity and after it::
1 (minimally) to 5 (completely) Pre Post
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
1. Describe the pathophysiologic differences between various causes of angioedema.
2. Identify, evaluate, and manage acute complications of hereditary angioedema (HAE).
3. Explain the natural history, precipitating events, and chronic management of HAE, including
short-term and long-term prophylactic treatments.
How many of your patients are likely to be impacted by what you learned from these activities?
○ <20% ○ 20%–40% ○ 40%–60% ○ 60%–80% ○ >80%
Do you expect that these activities will help you improve your skill or judgment 1 2 3 4 5
within the next 6 months? (1 - definitely will not change, 5 - definitely will change)
How will you apply what you learned from these activities (mark all that apply):
In diagnosing patients ○ In making treatment decisions ○
In monitoring patients ○ As a foundation to learn more ○
In educating students and colleagues ○ In educating patients and their caregivers ○
As part of a quality or peformance improvement project ○ To confirm current practice ○
For maintenance of board certification ○ For maintenance of licensure ○
To consider enrolling patients in clinical trials ○
Other ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Please list at least one strategy you learned from this activity that you will apply in practice:
Please list at least one (1) change you will make to your practice as a result of this activity:
Did you perceive any bias for or against any commercial products or devices? Yes No
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 225
226 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
FIGURE 1. Tuberculosis calcified lymph node: calcified right paracolic node showing macrocalcification (long thin arrows) and dense
posterior acoustic shadowing (thick arrows). The abdominal wall muscles (arrowhead) are seen in the upper part of the image, and the
mesenteric fat (star) is seen adjacent to the calcified lymph node. The tuberculous node lacks the normal lymph node architecture.
the mesentery and surrounding lymph nodes. The ultrasound de- abnormal lymph node architecture with calcification. Tuberculous
tection of either abdominal lymphadenopathy or ascites, focal lymph nodes will show suppurative changes in the acute phase.
lesions in the liver, or splenic microabscesses is highly suggestive On ultrasound, central necrosis appears as a hypoechoic, hetero-
of intra-abdominal tuberculosis.2,5 geneous echogenicity with debris, septa, and reduction of the
The central abdominal areas should be scanned to detect ab- hyperechoic fatty hilum. There may also be adjacent perinodal
normal dilatation of the small bowel, mesenteric thickening, and soft tissue edema and matting (clumping of multiple nodes with
FIGURE 2. Normal intra-abdominal lymph node for comparison: well-defined lymph node in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen,
which is reniform in shape with a fatty echogenic hilum (long thin arrow). The hilum is continuous with adjacent soft tissue, and the cortex
(star) is relatively hypoechoic when compared with the surrounding tissues. The abdominal wall muscles (arrowhead) and bowel (thick arrow)
with intraluminal contents are seen adjacent to the intra-abdominal lymph node.
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 227
no normal soft tissue in between).6,7 On color Doppler assessment, Tuberculous lymphadenitis in the abdomen can be a result of
vascular distribution with apparent avascular areas and displaced reactivation of healed foci (which were involved during primary
hilar vascularity can be seen in the lymph node.8 infection) or due to hematogenous spread of the tuberculosis
The most common site of intestinal involvement in abdomi- bacilli. Within the abdomen, the lymph nodes in the small
nal tuberculosis is the ileocecal junction (terminal ileal wall bowel mesentery and retroperitoneum are most commonly in-
thickening) and the cecum.3 “Pseudo-kidney sign” describes volved.3 Additional areas of lymph node involvement can include
the involvement of the ileocecal region, which is pulled up to the periportal, peripancreatic, anterior pararenal space, and upper
a subhepatic position producing a bowel mass with an echogenic para-aortic areas.4
central lumen.9 Involvement of the peritoneum will present most The clinical presentation of abdominal tuberculosis is often
commonly as simple ascites or less frequently as complex fluid nonspecific, with vague abdominal pain and systemic complaints,
with septations.4 Mesenteric involvement in abdominal tuberculo- which can lead to a delayed diagnosis.17 Laboratory tests are often
sis, which appears as thickening of the mesentery, is noticed mainly nonspecific, and the tuberculin skin tests and Ziehl-Neelsen stain-
in the left quadrant and paraumbilical regions of the abdomen. ing might yield negative results.18,19 The condition also mimics
The ultrasound assessment should conclude by scanning the many conditions, including malignancy, inflammatory bowel dis-
hepatic and splenic areas for hypoechoic granulomas, and renal ease, and other infectious diseases.20
parenchyma for echogenic lesions and calcifications. Additional The ultrasound findings in abdominal tuberculosis are diverse
scanning in the subxiphoid window to evaluate for the presence because of the varied extent of involvement of hollow viscus, solid
of a pericardial effusion and in bilateral upper quadrants looking organs, lymph nodes, mesentery, and peritoneum depending on the
for an anechoic area in the supradiaphragmatic area (or the “spine stage of the disease process. However, the presence of sonological
sign” suggestive of a pleural effusion) will help detect the presence findings specific to different stages of abdominal tuberculosis
of pericardial and pulmonary involvement, respectively.5 may help expedite the diagnosis in the appropriate clinical setting.
Genitourinary tuberculosis, a form of secondary tuberculo- The most characteristic sonographic finding in patients with early
sis, is very rare in children.10 The sonographic features of renal tu- abdominal tuberculosis is the combination of mesenteric thicken-
berculosis include renal parenchymal masses, cavities, and renal ing with associated mesenteric lymphadenopathy in the proper
or ureteral calcifications. “Putty-like” kidney, which describes clinical setting.21 As the disease progresses, abdominal lymph-
calcified caseous homogeneous renal tissue with moderately adenopathy and splenic microabscesses are consistent findings
dense echogenic appearance greater than 1 cm in diameter, is also in these patients.22 The notable presence of ascites (especially
a rare presentation in children. with fibrinous stranding) and hepatomegaly on ultrasound are
In patients with advanced tuberculosis, clustered calcifications
in several foci can progress to extensive hyperechoic appearing
nodal calcifications with dense posterior acoustic shadowing in TABLE 1. Summary of Ultrasound Findings in Different
Anatomical Areas in Children With Tuberculosis
the chronic phase (Fig. 1).8,11 Tuberculous calcifications distort
the normal reniform architecture of intra-abdominal lymph nodes
Anatomical Region Sonographic Findings
with loss of the fatty echogenic hilum (Fig. 1, 2). Calcified
tuberculous intra-abdominal lymph nodes are generally located in Peritoneal cavity Ascites
the lower central or right lower paracolic areas of the abdomen. • Clear
The differential diagnosis for intra-abdominal calcified lymph • Loculated (thick septa)
nodes in children includes nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, • Sandwich sign (small amount of ascitic
sarcoidosis, lymphoma, leukemia, inflammatory bowel disease fluid between the bowel loops)
(especially Crohn disease), systemic lupus erythematosus, and Lymph nodes Intranodal cystic necrosis
rheumatoid arthritis.12 Perinodal anechoic areas
Matting
Speckled calcification*
Coarse calcification with posterior
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE acoustic shadows *
Point-of-care ultrasound of the abdomen performed by emer- Mesentery Mesenteric thickening >15 mm
gency physicians is increasingly being used to evaluate patients Increased echogenicity of mesentery
with a variety of clinical complaints and to facilitate accurate diag- Intestines Ileocecal thickening
noses in the emergency department.13 After a thorough history Pseudo-kidney sign (subhepatic bowel
and clinical examination, POCUS should be considered for the as- mass with echogenic central lumen)
sessment of acute abdominal pain, based on the particular differ- Small bowel dilatation
ential diagnosis. Ultrasound can be a useful adjunct for the Increased peristalsis due to small
bedside diagnosis of a variety of abdominal pathologies including bowel obstruction
appendicitis, small bowel obstruction, and gastrointestinal perfo- Liver Focal hypoechoic lesions
ration.13 In resource-limited settings, POCUS performed by emer- Calcified hyperechoic granulomas
gency physicians has been shown to be associated with a faster Spleen Hypoechoic splenic microabscesses
time to diagnosis for a large variety of conditions.14 Hyperechoic splenic granulomas
Abdominal tuberculosis is a common form of extrapulmonary Heart Pericardial effusion
tuberculosis, with lymph nodes being the most commonly involved Lungs Pleural effusion
site, but involvement of other areas of the gastrointestinal tract in- Genitourinary Focal renal echogenic lesion
cluding the liver, spleen, adrenals, and peritoneum can also be Renal parenchymal hypoechoic cavities
seen.15 Tuberculous bacilli reach the abdomen by three routes of Renal parenchymal echogenic calcifications
transmission: gastrointestinal tract infection by ingestion of contam- Ureteral echogenic calcifications
inated sputum or milk followed by spread into the lymph nodes, “Putty-like” kidney
hematogenous spread from a distant tuberculous focus, and direct *Advanced stages of tuberculosis.
transmission from adjacent infected intra-abdominal organs.16
228 www.pec-online.com © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
consistently detected in patients with advanced abdominal tuber- 9. Kedar RP, Shah PP, Shivde RS, et al. Sonographic findings in
culosis.3 While the presence of an individual sonological finding gastrointestinal and peritoneal tuberculosis. Clin Radiol.
might have limited diagnostic value in the diagnosis of abdominal 1994;49:24–29.
tuberculosis, the confluence of multiple sonological findings 10. Nerli RB, Kamat GV, Alur SB, et al. Genitourinary tuberculosis in pediatric
(Table 1) makes the diagnosis highly likely. urological practice. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:299–303.
11. Eisenkraft BL, Som PM. The spectrum of benign and malignant etiologies
CONCLUSIONS of cervical node calcification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;
In a plausible clinical setting, the concurrent presence of 172:1433–1437.
intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy, ascites, mesenteric thickening, 12. Karmazyn B, Werner EA, Rejaie B, et al. Mesenteric lymph nodes in
ileocecal thickening, and splenic microabscesses on ultrasound children: what is normal? Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:774–777.
imaging are suspicious for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal tuber-
13. Kameda T, Taniguchi N. Overview of point-of-care abdominal ultrasound
culosis. Although typically diagnosed on computed tomography
in emergency and critical care. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:53.
or magnetic resonance imaging, in our case, POCUS helped facil-
itate the bedside diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis in a pediatric 14. Stanley A, Wajanga BMK, Jaka H, et al. The impact of systematic
patient presenting to the emergency department. point-of-care ultrasound on management of patients in a resource-limited
setting. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:488–492.
REFERENCES 15. Shao H, Yang Z-G, Xu G-H, et al. Tuberculosis in the abdominal
lymph nodes: evaluation with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance
1. Lin Y-S, Huang Y-C, Lin T-Y. Abdominal tuberculosis in children: a
imaging. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Off J Int Union Tuberc Lung Dis.
diagnostic challenge. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2010;43:188–193.
2013;17:90–95.
2. Heller T, Goblirsch S, Wallrauch C, et al. Abdominal tuberculosis:
sonographic diagnosis and treatment response in HIV-positive adults in 16. Vanhoenacker FM, De Backer AI, Op de BB, et al. Imaging of
rural South Africa. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:e108–e112. gastrointestinal and abdominal tuberculosis. Eur Radiol. 2004;
14(suppl 3):E103–E115.
3. Rathi P, Gambhire P. Abdominal Tuberculosis. J Assoc Physicians India.
2016;64:38–47. 17. Teh LB, Ng HS, Ho MS, et al. The varied manifestations of abdominal
tuberculosis. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1987;16:488–494.
4. Malik A, Saxena NC. Ultrasound in abdominal tuberculosis. Abdom
Imaging. 2003;28:574–579. 18. Wells AD, Northover JM, Howard ER. Abdominal tuberculosis: still a
problem today. J R Soc Med. 1986;79:149–153.
5. Weber SF, Saravu K, Heller T, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound for
extrapulmonary tuberculosis in India: a prospective cohort study in 19. Uzunkoy A, Harma M, Harma M. Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis:
HIV-positive and HIV-negative presumptive tuberculosis patients. experience from 11 cases and review of the literature. World J
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98:266–273. Gastroenterol. 2004;10:3647–3649.
6. Ying M, Ahuja AT, Evans R, et al. Cervical lymphadenopathy: sonographic 20. Jadvar H, Mindelzun RE, Olcott EW, et al. Still the great mimicker:
differentiation between tuberculous nodes and nodal metastases from abdominal tuberculosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:
non-head and neck carcinomas. J Clin Ultrasound JCU. 1998;26:383–389. 1455–1460.
7. Ahuja A, Ying M, Evans R, et al. The application of ultrasound criteria for 21. Jain R, Sawhney S, Bhargava DK, et al. Diagnosis of abdominal
malignancy in differentiating tuberculous cervical adenitis from metastatic tuberculosis: sonographic findings in patients with early disease. AJR Am J
nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Radiol. 1995;50:391–395. Roentgenol. 1995;165:1391–1395.
8. Park JH, Kim DW. Sonographic diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis in 22. Bélard S, Heller T, Orie V, et al. Sonographic findings of abdominal
the neck. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2014;33: tuberculosis in children with pulmonary tuberculosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J.
1619–1626. 2017;36:1224–1226.
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 229
(Pediatr Emer Care 2021;37: 230–231) Medicaid still remains largely within the powers of individual
states, and telehealth implementation varies state to state in terms
of services for which providers will receive reimbursement. Also
B efore COVID-19, our pediatric emergency department (ED)
would have been evaluating and treating close to 180 children
daily. We are a quaternary care, level 1 trauma center, serving as a
at issue is telehealth parity legislation, which addresses whether
telehealth visits should be reimbursed at the same rates as
safety net for Washington Heights/Inwood in NYC, a primarily im- in-person visits for the same complaint.3 Even within New York
migrant, Latino, limited English-speaking population. Over 30% of State, reimbursement policies may differ across telehealth applica-
patients present with mild diseases, including colds, sore throats, tions. Despite efforts in March by the Centers for Medicare and
and rashes, most of which do not require highly specialized care. Medicaid (CMS) to expand the range of telehealth visits federally
COVID-19 has, and continues to affect adults on a much covered, an insurance plan might only cover primary care telehealth
larger scale than it affects children. When coupled with federally visits but not emergency visits. There are still entire markets that
and state-imposed “stay-at-home” orders in March and fear of lack telehealth, because of the lack of reimbursement or reimburse-
nosocomial spread of infection with travel to an ED, we knew ment at lower rates than comparable in-person services.
when COVID hit that our ED volume would fall. We were sur- Technological literacy is a huge barrier because users require
prised, though, that it fell by close to 85% and has remained low. access to a computer, tablet, or smartphone with high-speed Inter-
Before this unprecedented drop in patient volume, there was net. Greater than 40% of low-income New Yorkers lack
emergence of our multicampus pediatric emergency medicine high-speed Internet.4 There have been efforts to increase broad-
telehealth program that encompassed not only the community of band internet in low-income areas, but this issue still remains un-
Washington Heights but also that of Queens, one of the most ethni- resolved. Even if high quality internet is available, there is a price
cally diverse counties in the United States and the “epicenter of the tag associated with this which is a barrier, particularly if the
epicenter” of the US COVID pandemic. This comprehensive pro- telehealth visit is lengthy. The use of text messaging in health care
gram had been launched several years ago, but was still experienc- delivery and outreach has expanded in the last 15 to 20 years but
ing growing pains. Pediatric telehealth generally has blossomed system requirements for telehealth divide the patient population
nationally1 but, because of the nature of emergency medicine, along socioeconomic lines.5
which requires an urgent, hands-on, real-time evaluation of patients, The lack of English language proficiency is a compounding
telehealth in our EDs had not found its comfort zone. It should have barrier impairing access to pediatric emergency telehealth care.
been an efficient option for the 30% of our population experiencing Only half of New Yorkers speak English at home,2 and although
less severe disease. We had piloted a variety of virtual pediatric many EDs have 24-hour interpreter services, this is not yet stan-
emergency programs but provider buy-in and satisfaction was dard of care for telehealth practices. Additionally, there is a lack
limited, and pediatric ED virtual visits were low, approximating of telemarketing in these communities in their native languages.
1.3 calls per day during the winter of 2020. Pediatric ED telehealth Another factor that has likely impacted the recent lack of pe-
was still looking for its purpose. diatric emergency telehealth volume is the overall decrease in the
With Governor Cuomo's “NYS on PAUSE” order issued need for emergency care. Many pediatric visits to our ED are, at
March 20, 2020, and thus the newly imposed barrier to accessing least in part, to obtain school notes to excuse for illness, which
emergency care in an ED, we expected calls to our pediatric emer- is a requirement in NYC public schools. Schools are still primarily
gency telehealth program to soar but, again, they did not. Despite functioning virtually or, in some cases, in a hybrid fashion so
the fact that adult virtual emergency care was booming, calls for school notes are less in demand. Additionally, because children
children totaled fewer than 10 per day across all campuses. That are quarantined indoors, there are fewer opportunities for acciden-
leaves hundreds of patients per day who were missing from the tal injuries and community spread of infections.
emergency health care system, and begs the question, where were From our virtual experiences with the adult population, which
they and why were they not on telehealth? relied highly on telehealth during the COVID pandemic, we have
First, cost is an issue. As much as 27% of the communities realized the enormous capabilities of telemedicine in emergency
we serve lives below the poverty line.2 For this population, an care. In the last 10 months, in addition to hundreds of COVID-
emergency telehealth visit is unaffordable, particularly without in- 19–related concerns, we have addressed a range of clinical issues
surance reimbursement and if payment upfront is requested. in our adults from sore throats to chest pain and congestive heart
failure; we have even diagnosed appendicitis. We have provided a
From the *Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos platform for follow-up visits, respiratory checks, prescription re-
College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley newals, and specialty clinic referrals. Many of these, if not for
Children's Hospital; and †Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell
Medical College, New York Presbyterian Komansky Center for Children's
telehealth, would have been in-person ED visits.
Health, New York, NY. There are indeed limitations to pediatric emergency telehealth.
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Many say that virtual emergency care reduces the continuity of care
Reprints: Joan Bregstein, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia and intimacy that results from the traditional ongoing doctor-patient
University Medical Center, CHN-1, 3959 Broadway, New York, NY 10032
(e‐mail: jsb61@cumc.columbia.edu).
relationship, which develops over time. They also argue that there
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. are privacy issues and risk of hacking and infiltration in the syn-
ISSN: 0749-5161 chronous real-time video. Added to these are the possibility that
230 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
prescriptions, and possibly antibiotic use, may increase with vir- including how children access emergency medical care in the future.
tual visits. There is also the challenge of evaluating the very young We, as health care providers and policy makers, have a unique oppor-
population in which a hands-on physical examination might give tunity to change the way New Yorkers, and specifically children, use
a provider a better handle on how the patient is doing. However, the ED. With careful foresight and planning, we can effect positive
emergency telehealth provides the opportunity for the patient to change by making pediatric emergency telehealth more accessible
be seen urgently and expeditiously by a provider, virtually, in to all New Yorkers. We must work at the state level to ensure ap-
the privacy of their own home. It allows for a focused one-on- propriate third-party reimbursements and work locally to reduce
one patient to provider encounter and eliminates the inherent dis- language barriers and improve access to technology. These efforts
tractions of a busy ED environment. Additionally, there are oppor- will go a long way in improving access to emergency care for all.
tunities for virtual stethoscopes and otoscopes that can approach
the sophistication of a “live” physical examination, and the possi-
bility of stronger firewalls for protection of privacy. Most impor- REFERENCES
tantly, it has the potential to divert care outside of the ED for 1. Olson CA, McSwain SD, Curfman AL, et al. The current pediatric telehealth
patients who use EDs for less urgent concerns. landscape. Pediatrics. 2018;141:e20172334.
Pediatric emergency telehealth is efficient, time-saving, and 2. https://www.osc.state.ny.us/osdc/rpt2-2016.pdf
cost-saving. It should never replace the general pediatrician's role
in caring for children. However, access to emergency telehealth 3. Yang YT. Telehealth Parity Laws. Health Affairs Health Policy Brief. 2016:
can reduce patient wait times, both at home and in EDs. This will Aug. doi:10.1377/hbp20160815.244795.
go a long way toward decanting our ED waiting rooms, and ulti- 4. https://comptroller.nyc.gov/wp-content/uploads/documents/Census_and_
mately, reducing the spread of infection. The_City_Overcoming_NYC_Digital_Divide_Census.pdf:11-15.
We are hopeful that, with dissemination of the new vaccine, 5. Househ M. The role of short messaging service in supporting the delivery
the COVID-19 pandemic will pass its peak and will soon trend of healthcare: an umbrella systematic review. Health Inform J. 2016;
downward, but we should be mindful of how we resume our lives, 22:140–150.
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 231
232 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
treatment with at least 1 dose of antibiotic therapy. Laboratory 141 patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-three SARS-CoV-
data collected from initial presentation included complete blood 2–positive infants were age- and sex-matched to 53 SARS-CoV-
count, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, blood culture, uri- 2–negative infants (Fig. 1).
nalysis and urine culture, CSF analysis and culture, gastrointesti- Table 1 shows the demographics of the 2 groups. The mean
nal panel by PCR and/or stool culture, respiratory pathogen age of all infants was 44.4 days (range, 6–89 days); 19 (18%) were
panels, and nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR results. 0 to 28 days, 61 (58%) were 29 to 56 days, and 26 (25%) were 57
The primary outcome measure was the presence of an SBI. to 90 days; 62 (58%) were male. Both groups primarily identified
An SBI was defined as the growth of a pathogenic, bacterial organ- with White race and Hispanic ethnicity and had Medicaid insur-
ism in the urine, blood, stool, or CSF. A UTI was defined as 50,000 ance; fewer parents of infants with COVID-19 identified as pri-
colony-forming units/mL or greater of a single known pathogen mary English speakers (45%) than parents of controls (62%).
from a catheterized specimen or greater than 10,000 colony- Thirty-six (68%) SARS-CoV-2–positive infants and 33 (62%)
forming units/mL of a single uropathogen obtained via catheteriza- controls were admitted to general inpatient units; there was no
tion with a positive urinalysis. The urinalysis was considered posi- statistical difference in rate of admissions, median length of stay
tive if there was leukocyte esterase, and/or nitrites, or greater than if admitted, or treatment with antibiotics between the 2 groups.
10 white blood cells (WBCs)/high-power field in an uncentrifuged More SARS-CoV-2–positive infants had chest radiographs per-
specimen.19,20 Although data were collected on whether chest ra- formed (59%) compared with only 21% of negative controls
diographs were obtained, pneumonia was not classified as an SBI (P ≤ 0.0001); none of the radiographs in either group were
because of the difficulty in differentiating between bacterial and interpreted as lobar pneumonia, and no infants were treated for
viral pneumonia based on chest radiographs. clinical pneumonia.
We compared the demographics, clinical characteristics, lab- Infants in the 2 groups had similar clinical presentations with
oratory results, and rates of SBI between infants with and without a mean temperature of 101.0°F for cases and 101.1°F for controls
COVID-19. Controls consisted of infants who were sex- and (Table 2). Compared with controls, SARS-CoV-2–positive infants
age-matched (within 14 days of age) who presented with fever presented more frequently with respiratory symptoms (47% vs
during the same time period but had a negative SARS-CoV-2 23%; P ≤ 0.014) and had lower median WBC counts (8.1 vs
PCR test. Student t tests were used to analyze continuous vari- 11.6; P < 0.0001) and CRP values (0.50 vs 0.85; P ≤ 0.01). There
ables, Fisher exact tests were used to analyze categorical data, were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of
and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for ordinal data. Relative risk constitutional symptoms (including lethargy, irritability, and rash),
(RR) ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated gastrointestinal symptoms, or median procalcitonin values.
between the 2 populations of interest. All statistical tests were Table 3 shows the rates of SBI between the 2 groups. In the
2-tailed. Statistical significance was designated at a P ≤ 0.05. Sta- COVID-19 group, there were 4 cases of SBI (8%). There were 3
tistical analysis was performed using Prism version 8.0 software (6%) UTIs caused by Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis,
(GraphPad, San Diego, Calif ). The study protocol was approved and Klebsiella aerogenes, all occurring in males younger than
by the hospital's institutional review board. 60 days, and 1 (2%) bacterial enteritis due to Salmonella species.
There were no cases of bacteremia, bacterial meningitis, or addi-
tional respiratory infections in this group. In the control group,
RESULTS there were 18 cases of SBI (34%). There were 12 (23%) UTIs, 4
A total of 220 charts were identified based on International (8%) cases of bacterial enteritis, and 2 (4%) cases of bacteremia.
Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes, and a total of Urinary tract infections occurred in 8 males and 4 females; all
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 233
234 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Variable COVID-19–Positive (n = 53) COVID-19 Negative (n = 53) Relative Risk (95% CI) P
Any SBI 4 (8%) 18 (34%) 0.22 (0.08 to 0.57) 0.001
UTI 3 (6%) 12 (23%) 0.25 (0.08 to 0.76) 0.02
Enteritis 1 (2%) 4 (8%) 0.25 (0.04 to 1.6) 0.36
IBI (bacteremia/meningitis) 0 2 (4%) 0 0.5
Values are number (%).
influenza-negative counterparts (2.5% vs 13.3% with an RR of CoV-2–positive and negative febrile infants with an RR of 0.22.
0.19), with UTIs being the most common infection. While these Similar to published literature, the most common infections in
individual studies differed in age groups and definitions of SBIs, both groups were UTIs, and there was a statistical difference in
they all documented lower rates of SBI in the viral respiratory UTIs between the 2 groups with an RR of 0.25. There were very
groups (range, 2.5%–7%) compared with RSV/influenza–negative few cases of IBI and no statistical difference between the 2 groups;
counterparts (up to 13%), with statistically significant differences the 2 cases of bacteremia occurred in infants younger than 28 days
in rates of UTIs (the most commonly observed SBI) between the who are generally considered a high-risk population and fre-
groups but no difference in bacteremia or meningitis due to the quently receive a complete evaluation and empiric antibiotic treat-
infrequency of these infections (rates of <2%).3–10 ment solely based on age.
As exemplified by these individual studies, Ralston et al8 an- Compared with the study by Leibowitz et al16 that found in-
alyzed the risk of SBI in febrile infants younger than 90 days with creased lethargy and feeding difficulties in infants with COVID-
bronchiolitis and/or RSV by conducting a meta-analysis of studies 19, we found that infants with COVID-19 had similar clinical pre-
conducted through 2010. Eleven studies were analyzed (using sentations to their negative counterparts except for an increase in
UTI, bacteremia, and bacterial meningitis to define SBI) and respiratory symptoms. On laboratory evaluation, we found
found that the most common infections were UTIs with a weighted SARS-CoV-2–positive infants to have lower WBC and CRP values,
rate of 3.3%; there were very few cases of bacteremia, and there which correlates with the leukopenia and neutropenia documented
were no cases of meningitis reported.8 These results confirm that in other case series.16–18 As there were more cases of SBI in the
febrile infants with viral infections have significantly lower risks control group, the WBC, CRP, and procalcitonin values would be
of SBI, but still have an appreciable rate of UTIs. expected to be higher in this group, although we did not see an ap-
Case reports describe infants with COVID-19 presenting preciable difference in procalcitonin. Although there is no standard
with nonspecific symptoms such as fever, lethargy, poor feeding, protocol for the evaluation and management of febrile infants at our
tachypnea, and diarrhea—similar to the symptoms seen in the institution, there was no statistically significant difference in urine,
general febrile infant population and therefore making them an in- blood, or CSF cultures obtained; the rate of admissions from the
teresting addition to the febrile infant conundrum.12–18 The largest ED; or the number of patients receiving empiric antibiotic therapy
study on neonates with COVID-19 included a sample of 37 neo- between the 2 groups of infants. SARS-CoV-2–positive infants
nates (average age of 15.6 days ±7.7) from Turkey. This study re- did have more chest radiographs performed, likely secondary to
ported that neonates presented more commonly with fever, their increase in respiratory symptoms, but no consolidations sug-
hypoxemia, and cough; 57% required respiratory support with gestive of superimposed pneumonia were identified.
supplemental oxygen or noninvasive ventilation, but only 3% re- Our study had several limitations. Our cohort of infants was
quired mechanical ventilation.14 While this study is informative, relatively small because of the time frame and smaller prevalence
it focused on a younger, not exclusively febrile population and of infants with COVID-19 as compared with other respiratory in-
did not comment on the rates of SBI in these infants. fections. While our rate of SBI in the controls was higher than re-
There have been several small case series focusing on febrile ported rates, our minimal rates of bacteremia and meningitis
infants with COVID-19 in the United States. The largest study had correlate with the literature. Our study also coincided with a Sal-
20 SARS-CoV-2–positive febrile infants younger than 90 days monella outbreak traced to onions and peaches, and we had a high
who were found to have higher rates of lethargy and feeding diffi- rate of Salmonella enteritis. Furthermore, the overall hospital cen-
culties on presentation and lower WBC, neutrophil, and lympho- sus was low during the study period, but there was a higher acuity
cyte counts compared with 81 SARS-CoV-2–negative infants case mix index suggesting a skewed proportion of ill-appearing
from previous years. None of these SARS-CoV-2–positive infants infants presented to the ED. This was a retrospective study; there-
had concurrent SBIs compared with 18 (22%) of the SARS-CoV- fore, the data collected are limited to what is recorded in the elec-
2–negative infants.16 Our study builds off this comparison study tronic medical record. The decision to obtain a SARS-CoV-2 PCR
and case reports by McLaren et al17 and Mithal et al,18 which test was left to the discretion of the physician; therefore, not every
did report UTIs (2 cases and 1 case respectively) in young febrile febrile infant presenting to the ED was tested. These PCR results
infants with concurrent COVID-19 infections but had no reports are also not readily available overnight so diagnostic and manage-
of IBI. ment decisions may have been made without this knowledge. Not
To our knowledge, our study is the largest case series of every infant had cultures from all sources obtained (particularly
COVID-19 infections in febrile infants younger than 90 days of stool cultures, which were obtained based only on clinical suspi-
age and the first study to specifically investigate the rates of SBI cion for enteritis); thus, although unlikely, some infants may have
in these infants compared with age- and sex-matched SARS- had an SBI that was missed because of lack of cultures.
CoV-2–negative febrile infants. Although our overall rates of Our study contributes to the growing literature on the risks of
SBI were higher than previous studies addressing the risk of SBI SBI in febrile infants in the setting of a global pandemic caused by
in infants with respiratory viral infections, there remained a statis- a novel RNA virus. While the risk of SBI was lower in febrile in-
tically significant difference in the rates of SBI between SARS- fants younger than 90 days with COVID-19, the rates of UTI were
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 235
not insignificant, making urine studies still a worthwhile diagnos- 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus disease 2019
tic tool. Although a small sample, our data are consistent with pre- (COVID-19). 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-
vious studies describing lower risks of SBI in young febrile infants ncov/index.html. Accessed October 6, 2020.
with concomitant viral respiratory infections, suggesting that 12. Altendahl M, Afshar Y, de St Maurice A, et al. Perinatal
while COVID-19 may have a variety of clinical presentations maternal-fetal/neonatal transmission of COVID-19: a guide to safe
and courses, in the febrile infant population it appears to be similar maternal and neonatal care in the era of COVID-19 and physical distancing.
to other viral pathogens. As the future of this current pandemic is NeoReviews. 2020;21:e783–e794.
still unknown, larger studies are needed to further assess the risk 13. Zeng L, Xia S, Yuan W, et al. Neonatal early-onset infection with
of SBIs with greater confidence in febrile infants with COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 in 33 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 in Wuhan,
China. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:722–725.
REFERENCES 14. Kanburoglu MK, Tayman C, Oncel MY, et al. A multicentered study on
1. Bachur RG, Harper MB. Predictive model for serious bacterial infections epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 37 neonates with
among infants younger than 3 months of age. Pediatrics. 2001; community-acquired COVID-19. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39:e297–e302.
108:311–316. 15. Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in
2. Baraff LJ, Oslund SA, Schriger DL, et al. Probability of bacterial infections China. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20200702.
in febrile infants less than three months of age: a meta-analysis. Pediatr 16. Leibowitz J, Krief W, Barone S, et al. Comparison of clinical and
Infect Dis J. 1992;11:257–264. epidemiologic characteristics of young febrile infants with and without
3. Byington CL, Enriquez FR, Hoff C, et al. Serious bacterial infections in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. J Pediatr.
febrile infants 1 to 90 days old with and without viral infections. Pediatrics. 2020;S0022-3476(20)31264-6.
2004;113:1662–1666. 17. McLaren SH, Dayan PS, Fenster DB, et al. Novel coronavirus infection in
4. Levine DA, Platt SL, Dayan PS, et al. Risk of serious bacterial infection in febrile infants aged 60 days and younger. Pediatrics. 2020;146:e20201550.
young febrile infants with respiratory syncytial virus infections. Pediatrics. 18. Mithal LB, Machut KZ, Muller WJ, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants
2004;113:1728–1734. less than 90 days old. J Pediatr. 2020;224:150–152.
5. Titus MO, Wright SW. Prevalence of serious bacterial infections in 19. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection, Steering Committee on Quality
febrile infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatrics. 2003; Improvement and Management, Roberts KB. Urinary tract infection:
112:282–284. clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial
6. Krief WI, Levine DA, Platt SL, et al. Influenza virus infection and the risk UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics. 2011;
of serious bacterial infections in young febrile infants. Pediatrics. 2009; 128:595–610.
124:30–39. 20. Kuppermann N, Dayan PS, Levine DA, et al. A clinical prediction rule to
7. Melendez E, Harper MB. Utility of sepsis evaluation in infants 90 days of identify febrile infants 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial
age or younger with fever and clinical bronchiolitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. infections. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:342–351.
2003;22:1053–1056. 21. Jaskiewicz JA, McCarthy CA, Richardson AC, et al. Febrile infants at low
8. Ralston S, Hill V, Waters A. Occult serious bacterial infection in infants risk for serious bacterial infection—an appraisal of the Rochester criteria
younger than 60 to 90 days with bronchiolitis: a systematic review. Arch and implications for management. Febrile Infant Collaborative Study
Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:951–956. Group. Pediatrics. 1994;94:390–396.
9. Hall CB, Powell KR, Schnabel KC, et al. Risk of secondary bacterial 22. Baraff LJ, Bass JW, Fleisher GR, et al. Practice guideline for the
infection in infants hospitalized with respiratory syncytial viral infection. management of infants and children 0 to 36 months of age with fever
J Pediatr. 1988;113:266–271. without source. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Ann Emerg
10. Mahajan P, Browne LR, Levine DA, et al, Febrile Infant Working Group of Med. 1993;22:1198–1210.
the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). 23. Liebelt EL, Qi K, Harvey K. Diagnostic testing for serious bacterial
Risk of bacterial coinfections in febrile infants 60 days old and younger infections in infants aged 90 days or younger with bronchiolitis. Arch
with documented viral infections. J Pediatr. 2018;203:86–91.e2. Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:525–530.
REFERENCE
Sneller H, Vega C, Zemel L, et al. Acute Hemorrhagic Edema of Infancy With Associated Hemorrhagic Lacrimation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37:e70–e72.
236 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
232 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
treatment with at least 1 dose of antibiotic therapy. Laboratory 141 patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-three SARS-CoV-
data collected from initial presentation included complete blood 2–positive infants were age- and sex-matched to 53 SARS-CoV-
count, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, blood culture, uri- 2–negative infants (Fig. 1).
nalysis and urine culture, CSF analysis and culture, gastrointesti- Table 1 shows the demographics of the 2 groups. The mean
nal panel by PCR and/or stool culture, respiratory pathogen age of all infants was 44.4 days (range, 6–89 days); 19 (18%) were
panels, and nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR results. 0 to 28 days, 61 (58%) were 29 to 56 days, and 26 (25%) were 57
The primary outcome measure was the presence of an SBI. to 90 days; 62 (58%) were male. Both groups primarily identified
An SBI was defined as the growth of a pathogenic, bacterial organ- with White race and Hispanic ethnicity and had Medicaid insur-
ism in the urine, blood, stool, or CSF. A UTI was defined as 50,000 ance; fewer parents of infants with COVID-19 identified as pri-
colony-forming units/mL or greater of a single known pathogen mary English speakers (45%) than parents of controls (62%).
from a catheterized specimen or greater than 10,000 colony- Thirty-six (68%) SARS-CoV-2–positive infants and 33 (62%)
forming units/mL of a single uropathogen obtained via catheteriza- controls were admitted to general inpatient units; there was no
tion with a positive urinalysis. The urinalysis was considered posi- statistical difference in rate of admissions, median length of stay
tive if there was leukocyte esterase, and/or nitrites, or greater than if admitted, or treatment with antibiotics between the 2 groups.
10 white blood cells (WBCs)/high-power field in an uncentrifuged More SARS-CoV-2–positive infants had chest radiographs per-
specimen.19,20 Although data were collected on whether chest ra- formed (59%) compared with only 21% of negative controls
diographs were obtained, pneumonia was not classified as an SBI (P ≤ 0.0001); none of the radiographs in either group were
because of the difficulty in differentiating between bacterial and interpreted as lobar pneumonia, and no infants were treated for
viral pneumonia based on chest radiographs. clinical pneumonia.
We compared the demographics, clinical characteristics, lab- Infants in the 2 groups had similar clinical presentations with
oratory results, and rates of SBI between infants with and without a mean temperature of 101.0°F for cases and 101.1°F for controls
COVID-19. Controls consisted of infants who were sex- and (Table 2). Compared with controls, SARS-CoV-2–positive infants
age-matched (within 14 days of age) who presented with fever presented more frequently with respiratory symptoms (47% vs
during the same time period but had a negative SARS-CoV-2 23%; P ≤ 0.014) and had lower median WBC counts (8.1 vs
PCR test. Student t tests were used to analyze continuous vari- 11.6; P < 0.0001) and CRP values (0.50 vs 0.85; P ≤ 0.01). There
ables, Fisher exact tests were used to analyze categorical data, were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of
and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for ordinal data. Relative risk constitutional symptoms (including lethargy, irritability, and rash),
(RR) ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated gastrointestinal symptoms, or median procalcitonin values.
between the 2 populations of interest. All statistical tests were Table 3 shows the rates of SBI between the 2 groups. In the
2-tailed. Statistical significance was designated at a P ≤ 0.05. Sta- COVID-19 group, there were 4 cases of SBI (8%). There were 3
tistical analysis was performed using Prism version 8.0 software (6%) UTIs caused by Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis,
(GraphPad, San Diego, Calif ). The study protocol was approved and Klebsiella aerogenes, all occurring in males younger than
by the hospital's institutional review board. 60 days, and 1 (2%) bacterial enteritis due to Salmonella species.
There were no cases of bacteremia, bacterial meningitis, or addi-
tional respiratory infections in this group. In the control group,
RESULTS there were 18 cases of SBI (34%). There were 12 (23%) UTIs, 4
A total of 220 charts were identified based on International (8%) cases of bacterial enteritis, and 2 (4%) cases of bacteremia.
Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes, and a total of Urinary tract infections occurred in 8 males and 4 females; all
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 233
234 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Variable COVID-19–Positive (n = 53) COVID-19 Negative (n = 53) Relative Risk (95% CI) P
Any SBI 4 (8%) 18 (34%) 0.22 (0.08 to 0.57) 0.001
UTI 3 (6%) 12 (23%) 0.25 (0.08 to 0.76) 0.02
Enteritis 1 (2%) 4 (8%) 0.25 (0.04 to 1.6) 0.36
IBI (bacteremia/meningitis) 0 2 (4%) 0 0.5
Values are number (%).
influenza-negative counterparts (2.5% vs 13.3% with an RR of CoV-2–positive and negative febrile infants with an RR of 0.22.
0.19), with UTIs being the most common infection. While these Similar to published literature, the most common infections in
individual studies differed in age groups and definitions of SBIs, both groups were UTIs, and there was a statistical difference in
they all documented lower rates of SBI in the viral respiratory UTIs between the 2 groups with an RR of 0.25. There were very
groups (range, 2.5%–7%) compared with RSV/influenza–negative few cases of IBI and no statistical difference between the 2 groups;
counterparts (up to 13%), with statistically significant differences the 2 cases of bacteremia occurred in infants younger than 28 days
in rates of UTIs (the most commonly observed SBI) between the who are generally considered a high-risk population and fre-
groups but no difference in bacteremia or meningitis due to the quently receive a complete evaluation and empiric antibiotic treat-
infrequency of these infections (rates of <2%).3–10 ment solely based on age.
As exemplified by these individual studies, Ralston et al8 an- Compared with the study by Leibowitz et al16 that found in-
alyzed the risk of SBI in febrile infants younger than 90 days with creased lethargy and feeding difficulties in infants with COVID-
bronchiolitis and/or RSV by conducting a meta-analysis of studies 19, we found that infants with COVID-19 had similar clinical pre-
conducted through 2010. Eleven studies were analyzed (using sentations to their negative counterparts except for an increase in
UTI, bacteremia, and bacterial meningitis to define SBI) and respiratory symptoms. On laboratory evaluation, we found
found that the most common infections were UTIs with a weighted SARS-CoV-2–positive infants to have lower WBC and CRP values,
rate of 3.3%; there were very few cases of bacteremia, and there which correlates with the leukopenia and neutropenia documented
were no cases of meningitis reported.8 These results confirm that in other case series.16–18 As there were more cases of SBI in the
febrile infants with viral infections have significantly lower risks control group, the WBC, CRP, and procalcitonin values would be
of SBI, but still have an appreciable rate of UTIs. expected to be higher in this group, although we did not see an ap-
Case reports describe infants with COVID-19 presenting preciable difference in procalcitonin. Although there is no standard
with nonspecific symptoms such as fever, lethargy, poor feeding, protocol for the evaluation and management of febrile infants at our
tachypnea, and diarrhea—similar to the symptoms seen in the institution, there was no statistically significant difference in urine,
general febrile infant population and therefore making them an in- blood, or CSF cultures obtained; the rate of admissions from the
teresting addition to the febrile infant conundrum.12–18 The largest ED; or the number of patients receiving empiric antibiotic therapy
study on neonates with COVID-19 included a sample of 37 neo- between the 2 groups of infants. SARS-CoV-2–positive infants
nates (average age of 15.6 days ±7.7) from Turkey. This study re- did have more chest radiographs performed, likely secondary to
ported that neonates presented more commonly with fever, their increase in respiratory symptoms, but no consolidations sug-
hypoxemia, and cough; 57% required respiratory support with gestive of superimposed pneumonia were identified.
supplemental oxygen or noninvasive ventilation, but only 3% re- Our study had several limitations. Our cohort of infants was
quired mechanical ventilation.14 While this study is informative, relatively small because of the time frame and smaller prevalence
it focused on a younger, not exclusively febrile population and of infants with COVID-19 as compared with other respiratory in-
did not comment on the rates of SBI in these infants. fections. While our rate of SBI in the controls was higher than re-
There have been several small case series focusing on febrile ported rates, our minimal rates of bacteremia and meningitis
infants with COVID-19 in the United States. The largest study had correlate with the literature. Our study also coincided with a Sal-
20 SARS-CoV-2–positive febrile infants younger than 90 days monella outbreak traced to onions and peaches, and we had a high
who were found to have higher rates of lethargy and feeding diffi- rate of Salmonella enteritis. Furthermore, the overall hospital cen-
culties on presentation and lower WBC, neutrophil, and lympho- sus was low during the study period, but there was a higher acuity
cyte counts compared with 81 SARS-CoV-2–negative infants case mix index suggesting a skewed proportion of ill-appearing
from previous years. None of these SARS-CoV-2–positive infants infants presented to the ED. This was a retrospective study; there-
had concurrent SBIs compared with 18 (22%) of the SARS-CoV- fore, the data collected are limited to what is recorded in the elec-
2–negative infants.16 Our study builds off this comparison study tronic medical record. The decision to obtain a SARS-CoV-2 PCR
and case reports by McLaren et al17 and Mithal et al,18 which test was left to the discretion of the physician; therefore, not every
did report UTIs (2 cases and 1 case respectively) in young febrile febrile infant presenting to the ED was tested. These PCR results
infants with concurrent COVID-19 infections but had no reports are also not readily available overnight so diagnostic and manage-
of IBI. ment decisions may have been made without this knowledge. Not
To our knowledge, our study is the largest case series of every infant had cultures from all sources obtained (particularly
COVID-19 infections in febrile infants younger than 90 days of stool cultures, which were obtained based only on clinical suspi-
age and the first study to specifically investigate the rates of SBI cion for enteritis); thus, although unlikely, some infants may have
in these infants compared with age- and sex-matched SARS- had an SBI that was missed because of lack of cultures.
CoV-2–negative febrile infants. Although our overall rates of Our study contributes to the growing literature on the risks of
SBI were higher than previous studies addressing the risk of SBI SBI in febrile infants in the setting of a global pandemic caused by
in infants with respiratory viral infections, there remained a statis- a novel RNA virus. While the risk of SBI was lower in febrile in-
tically significant difference in the rates of SBI between SARS- fants younger than 90 days with COVID-19, the rates of UTI were
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 235
not insignificant, making urine studies still a worthwhile diagnos- 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus disease 2019
tic tool. Although a small sample, our data are consistent with pre- (COVID-19). 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-
vious studies describing lower risks of SBI in young febrile infants ncov/index.html. Accessed October 6, 2020.
with concomitant viral respiratory infections, suggesting that 12. Altendahl M, Afshar Y, de St Maurice A, et al. Perinatal
while COVID-19 may have a variety of clinical presentations maternal-fetal/neonatal transmission of COVID-19: a guide to safe
and courses, in the febrile infant population it appears to be similar maternal and neonatal care in the era of COVID-19 and physical distancing.
to other viral pathogens. As the future of this current pandemic is NeoReviews. 2020;21:e783–e794.
still unknown, larger studies are needed to further assess the risk 13. Zeng L, Xia S, Yuan W, et al. Neonatal early-onset infection with
of SBIs with greater confidence in febrile infants with COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 in 33 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 in Wuhan,
China. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:722–725.
REFERENCES 14. Kanburoglu MK, Tayman C, Oncel MY, et al. A multicentered study on
1. Bachur RG, Harper MB. Predictive model for serious bacterial infections epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 37 neonates with
among infants younger than 3 months of age. Pediatrics. 2001; community-acquired COVID-19. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39:e297–e302.
108:311–316. 15. Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in
2. Baraff LJ, Oslund SA, Schriger DL, et al. Probability of bacterial infections China. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20200702.
in febrile infants less than three months of age: a meta-analysis. Pediatr 16. Leibowitz J, Krief W, Barone S, et al. Comparison of clinical and
Infect Dis J. 1992;11:257–264. epidemiologic characteristics of young febrile infants with and without
3. Byington CL, Enriquez FR, Hoff C, et al. Serious bacterial infections in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. J Pediatr.
febrile infants 1 to 90 days old with and without viral infections. Pediatrics. 2020;S0022-3476(20)31264-6.
2004;113:1662–1666. 17. McLaren SH, Dayan PS, Fenster DB, et al. Novel coronavirus infection in
4. Levine DA, Platt SL, Dayan PS, et al. Risk of serious bacterial infection in febrile infants aged 60 days and younger. Pediatrics. 2020;146:e20201550.
young febrile infants with respiratory syncytial virus infections. Pediatrics. 18. Mithal LB, Machut KZ, Muller WJ, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants
2004;113:1728–1734. less than 90 days old. J Pediatr. 2020;224:150–152.
5. Titus MO, Wright SW. Prevalence of serious bacterial infections in 19. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection, Steering Committee on Quality
febrile infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatrics. 2003; Improvement and Management, Roberts KB. Urinary tract infection:
112:282–284. clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial
6. Krief WI, Levine DA, Platt SL, et al. Influenza virus infection and the risk UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics. 2011;
of serious bacterial infections in young febrile infants. Pediatrics. 2009; 128:595–610.
124:30–39. 20. Kuppermann N, Dayan PS, Levine DA, et al. A clinical prediction rule to
7. Melendez E, Harper MB. Utility of sepsis evaluation in infants 90 days of identify febrile infants 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial
age or younger with fever and clinical bronchiolitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. infections. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:342–351.
2003;22:1053–1056. 21. Jaskiewicz JA, McCarthy CA, Richardson AC, et al. Febrile infants at low
8. Ralston S, Hill V, Waters A. Occult serious bacterial infection in infants risk for serious bacterial infection—an appraisal of the Rochester criteria
younger than 60 to 90 days with bronchiolitis: a systematic review. Arch and implications for management. Febrile Infant Collaborative Study
Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:951–956. Group. Pediatrics. 1994;94:390–396.
9. Hall CB, Powell KR, Schnabel KC, et al. Risk of secondary bacterial 22. Baraff LJ, Bass JW, Fleisher GR, et al. Practice guideline for the
infection in infants hospitalized with respiratory syncytial viral infection. management of infants and children 0 to 36 months of age with fever
J Pediatr. 1988;113:266–271. without source. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Ann Emerg
10. Mahajan P, Browne LR, Levine DA, et al, Febrile Infant Working Group of Med. 1993;22:1198–1210.
the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). 23. Liebelt EL, Qi K, Harvey K. Diagnostic testing for serious bacterial
Risk of bacterial coinfections in febrile infants 60 days old and younger infections in infants aged 90 days or younger with bronchiolitis. Arch
with documented viral infections. J Pediatr. 2018;203:86–91.e2. Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:525–530.
REFERENCE
Sneller H, Vega C, Zemel L, et al. Acute Hemorrhagic Edema of Infancy With Associated Hemorrhagic Lacrimation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37:e70–e72.
236 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com 237
Phoenix Children's Jon McGreevy, jmcgreevy@ Claudia Yeung, cyeung@ Christina Ash cash@phoenixchildrens.com
Hospital MD, MSPH phoenixchildrens.com MD, FAAP phoenixchildrens.com
University of Arkansas Nick Hobart-Porter, porternicholasw@ Amber Morse, MD ammorse@uams.edu Stephanie Veach sveach@uams.edu
Medical Sciences DO uams.edu
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Loma Linda University Tim Young, MD tpyoung@llu.edu Heather Kuntz, MD hkuntz@llu.edu Shelly Nelson sknelson@llu.edu
Medical Center &
Children's Hospital
Children's Hospital Christine Cho, christine.cho@ Danielle Levitt, MD dlevitt@chla.usc.edu Yvette Resendiz yresendiz@chla.usc.edu
Los Angeles MD, MPH, Med chla.usc.edu Cindy Luu, MD ciluu@chla.usc.edu
UCSF Benioff Children's Cornelia (Nel) cornelia.latronica@ Leticia Kerlegan leticia.kerlegan@ucsf.edu
Hospital Oakland Latronica, MD ucsf.edu heidi.
Heidi Werner, werner@ucsf.edu
MD, MSHPEd
University of California, Kathryn Pade, MD kpade@rchsd.org Kaitlin Vallin kvallin@rchsd.org
San Diego Rady
Children's Hospital
Harbor-UCLA Medical Kelly Young, MD kyoung3@ Tim Horeczko, MD thoreczko@ Jeanne Austin jaustin@dhs.lacounty.gov
Center dhs.lacounty.gov dhs.lacounty.gov
Stanford University Andrea Fang, MD andreafang@ Brenda Roth broth2@stanford.edu
stanford.edu
University of Colorado Tien Vu, MD tien.vu@ Jason Woods, MD jason.woods@ Brooke Baker brooke.baker@childrenscolorado.org
Children's Hospital childrenscolorado.org childrenscolorado.org
Colorado
Orlando Health Program Efren Salinero, MD, FAAP efren.salinero@ Coleen Scuderi coleen.scuderi@orlandohealth.com
Arnold Palmer Hospital orlandohealth.com
for Children
Emory University Wendalyn K. Little, wendalyn.little@ Sherita Holmes, MD shertia.holmes@emory.edu Donna Stringfellow dstring@emory.edu
School of Medicine MD, MPH emory.edu
Children's Healthcare
of Atlanta
Medical College of Natalie Lane, MD nlane@augusta.edu Aimee Baer abaerellington@augusta.edu Lauren Neely lneely@augusta.edu
Georgia, Augusta Ellington, MD
University Children's
Hospital of Georgia
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Karen Mangold, kmangold@ Priya Jain, MD pgjain@ Neshwa Rajeh nrajeh@luriechildrens.org
Children's Hospital MD, MEd luriechildrens.org luriechildrens.org
University of Chicago Lisa McQueen, MD lmcqueen@peds.bsd. Diana Yan, MD diana.yan@ Kayla Stroner kayla.stroner@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu
Comer Children's Hospital uchicago.edu uchospitals.edu
Indiana University Stephen Cico, sjcico@iu.edu Heather Saavedra, MD hsaavedr@iu.edu Kris Powell krmpowel@iu.edu
Riley Hospital MD, MEd
for Children at IU Health
University of Louisville Danielle Graff, dmgraf02@louisville.edu Johanna Said, MD johanna.said@ Krystal Kaufman krystal.kaufman@louisville.edu
Norton Children's MD, MSc louisville.edu
Hospital
Johns Hopkins Thuy Ngo, thuy.ngo@jhmi.edu Kate Deanehan, MD jdeaneh1@jhmi.edu Laura Gerafentis lgerafe1@jhmi.edu
Children's Center DO, MEd Lauren Kahl, MD lkahl4@jhmi.edu
Boston Medical Center David Dorfman, david.dorfman@bmc.org Ariel Hoch, DO, MPH ariel.hoch@bmc.org Lisa Blake lisa.blake@bmc.org
MD
Boston Children's Hospital Joshua Nagler, MD, joshua.nagler@ Katie Dorney, MD kate.dorney@childrens. Kevin Deschenes kevin.deschenes@childrens.harvard.edu
MHPEd childrens.harvard.edu harvard.edu
UMMS-Baystate Blake Spirko, MD blake.spirko@ Julien Ginsberg- julien.ginsberg-peltz@ Tara Rivest tara.rivest@baystatehealth.org
baystatehealth.org Peltz, MD baystatehealth.org
Helen DeVos Children's Bhawana Arora, bhawana.arora@ Christopher Benner, MD christopher.benner@ Saron Mogos saron.mogos@spectrumhealth.org
Hospital Michigan MD spectrumhealth.org spectrumhealth.org
State University
238 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PO Box 2000, 11234 Anderson Street Loma Linda California 92354 (909) 558-7698 (909) 558-7941 https://lluh.org/health-professionals/gme/
MC A-890 resident-fellow/pediatric-emergency-
medicine-fellowship/how-apply
4650 Sunset Boulevard M/S #113 Los Angeles California 90027 (323) 361-2109 (323) 361-3891 https://www.chla.org/fellowship/emergency-
medicine-fellowship
747 52nd Street Oakland California 94609 (510) 428-3259 (510) 450-5836 https://www.childrenshospitaloakland.org/
main/pediatric-emergency-medicine-
fellowship-program.aspx
3020 Children's Way MC 5075 San Diego California 92123 (858) 966-8036 (858) 966-7433 http://www.rchsd.org/pemfellow
1000 West Carson Street Box #21 Torrance California 90509-2910 (424) 306-5400 (310) 212-6101 http://pemsource.org/about/
900 Welch Road, MC 5768 Palo Alto California 94304 (650) 723-6576 (650) 723-0121 https://emed.stanford.edu/fellowships/pediatric.html
Suite 350
13123 East 16th Avenue B-251 Aurora Colorado 80045 (303) 724-2566 (720) 777-7317 http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/
colleges/medicalschool/departments/
pediatrics/subs/emerg/educat/
fellowship/Pages/fellows.aspx
282 Washington Street Hartford Connecticut 06106 (860) 837-6260 (860) 837-6262 https://health.uconn.edu/graduate-medical-
education/pediatric-fellowships/pediatric-
fellowships/
100 York Street Suite 1F New Haven Connecticut 06511 (203) 737-7440 (203) 737-7447 https://medicine.yale.edu/pediatrics/
sections/emergencymed/fellowship/
1600 Rockland Road PO Box 269 Wilmington Delaware 19899 (302) 651-5860 (302) 651-4227 https://www.nemours.org/education/gme/
fellowships/emergency.html
111 Michigan Avenue NW Washington District of Columbia 20010 (202) 476-4177 (202) 476-3573 http://childrensnational.org/ForDoctors/gme/
fellowship/EmergencyMedicine/
EmergencyMedicine.aspx
UF Department of 655 West Eighth Street Jacksonville Florida 32209 (904) 244-4046 (904) 244-5848 http://www.hscj.ufl.edu/emergency-medicine/
Emergency Medicine fellowship-pediatric-emergency/
3100 SW 62nd Avenue Miami Florida 33155 (786) 624-3588 (305) 662-8291 https://www.nicklauschildrens.org/medical-
professionals/medical-education/graduate-
medical-education-gme/b-gme-fellowship-
training-programs/pediatric-
emergency-medicine-fellowship
92 West Miller Street Emergency Medicine Orlando Florida 32806-2036 (321) 841-7789 (321) 841-4046 orlandohealth.com/pedsem
MP-366
1547 Clifton Road, Atlanta Georgia 30322 (404) 785-7142 (404) 785-7989 https://med.emory.edu/departments/pediatrics/
2nd floor divisions/emergency-medicine/education/
fellow/index.html
1120 15th Street AF2016 Augusta Georgia 30912 (706) 721-5592 (706) 721-7718 https://www.augusta.edu/mcg/em/ed/
fellowships/pediatric/
225 East Chicago Avenue Box #62 Chicago Illinois 60611 (312) 227-6080 (312)227-9475 https://www.pediatrics.northwestern.edu/
education/fellows/emergency/
5721 South Maryland Avenue MC 8016 Chicago Illinois 60637 (773) 702-0432 (773) 834-0748 http://pediatrics.uchicago.edu/education/
fellowship/emergency-medicine
720 Eskenazi Avenue Faculty Office Building, Indianapolis Indiana 46202 (317) 944-1955 (317) 880-0545 https://medicine.iu.edu/emergency-medicine/
3rd floor education/fellowship/pediatrics
Department of Pediatric 571 South Floyd Street, Louisville Kentucky 40202 (502) 629-7212 (502) 629-5991 https://louisville.edu/medicine/departments/
Emergency Medicine Suite 412 pediatrics/divisions/emergency-medicine/
fellowship-program
1800 Orleans Street Bloomberg G1509 Baltimore Maryland 21287 (410) 955-6143 (410) 614-7339 https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/johns-hopkins-
childrens-center/healthcare-professionals/education/
fellowships/emergency-medicine/
801 Albany Street, 4th floor Boston Massachusetts 02119 (617) 414-5514 (617) 414-4393 https://www.bmc.org/pediatrics-emergency-department/
medical-professionals/fellowship-program
300 Longwood Avenue BCH3066 Boston Massachusetts 02115 (617) 355-6624 (617) 730-0335 https://dme.childrenshospital.org/graduate-medical-
education/trainings-programs/division-of-emergency-
medicine/pem-fellowship-program/
759 Chestnust Street S5427 Springfield Massachusetts 01199 (413) 794-5999 (413) 794-8070 http://www.baystatehealth.org/education-research/
education/fellowships/pediatric-emergency-medicine
100 Michigan Street NE MC 13 Grand Rapids Michigan 49503 (616) 267-1455 (616) 267-0090 https://www.spectrumhealth.org/
medicaleducation/fellowships/pediatric-
emergency-medicine
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 239
Oakland University Margaret Menoch, margaret.menoch@ Lauren Adams, lauren.adams2@ Melody Cikalo meloday.cikalo@beaumont.edu
William Beaumont School MD beaumont.edu MD Dan beaumont.edu
of Medicine William Nguyen, MD dan.nguyen@
Beaumont Hospital beaumont.edu
Children's Hospitals and Kara Seaton, MD kara.seaton@ Jennifer Argentieri, MD jennifer.argentieri@childrensmn.org Heather Pomeroy heather.pomeroy@childrensmn.org
Clinics of Minnesota childrensmn.org
Health Partners Institute of
Education and Research
University of Mississippi Melissa Frascogna, mfrascogna@umc.edu Matthew Maready, MD mmaready@umc.edu Denise Merideth dmerideth@umc.edu
Medical Center MD
Children's Mercy Hospital Lina Patel, MD lpatel@cmh.edu Frances Turcotte-Benedict fgturcotte@cmh.edu April Gerry algerry@cmh.edu
University of Natasha James, MD ncjames@salud.unm.edu Sara Skarbek-Borowska, MD sskarbek@salud.unm.edu Ryan Van Otten rvanotten@salud.unm.edu
New Mexico
Maimonides Infant Hector Vazquez, hvazquez@ Christine Rizkalla, MD crizkalla@maimonidesmed.org Susan Caliendo scaliendo@maimonidesmed.org
and Children's MD, MSc maimonidesmed.org
Hospital of Brooklyn
New York-Presbyterian Christopher chk9064@nyp.org Adetunbi Ayeni, MD ada9028@nyp.org Brian London bel9052@nyp.org
Brooklyn Methodist Kelly, MD
Hospital
Children's Hospital at Daniel Fein, MD dfein@montefiore.org JoAnne Walters jowalters@montefiore.org
Montefiore Albert
Einstein College
of Medicine
University of Buffalo Heather Territo, hterrito@buffalo.edu Kunal Chadha, MD kchadha@upa.chob.edu Sharon Chodora schodora@upa.chob.edu
John R. Oishei MD
Children's Hospital
Cohen Children's Medical Dave Teng, MD dnateng1999@gmail.com Michael Preis, DO mpreis@northwell.edu Jasmine Lawrence jlawrenc@northwell.edu
Center North Shore-LIJ
Health System
Children's Hospital of Cindy Roskind, cg278@cumc.columbia.edu Lisa Brooks-McDonald lm3451@cumc.columbia.edu
New York-Presbyterian MD
Columbia University
Medical Center
Icahn School of Medicine Lou Spina, MD louis.spina@mountsinai.org Jennifer Sanders, MD jennifer.sanders@mountsinai.org Claribel Velasquez claribel.velasquez@mountsinai.org
at Mount Sinai
240 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
345 North Smith Avenue Mailstop 70-504 St. Paul Minnesota 55102 (651) 220-6914 (651) 220-6033 https://www.childrensmn.org/careers/
internship-residency-fellowship-
programs/pediatric-emergency-medicine-
fellowship/
Department of Pediatrics 2500 North State Street Jackson Mississippi 39216 (601) 815-6922 (651) 984-2086 https://www.umc.edu/som/Departments%20and%
20Offices/SOM%20Departments/Pediatrics/
Divisions/Emergency%20Medicine/Fellowship/
Fellowship.html
2401 Gillham Road Kansas City Missouri 64108 (816) 302-8420 (816) 559-9520 https://www.childrensmercy.org/professional-
education/fellowships/pediatric-emergency-
medicine-fellowship/
1465 South Grand Boulevard St. Louis Missouri 63104 (314) 577-5360 (314) 268-4116 https://www.slu.edu/medicine/pediatrics/
fellowships/pediatric-emergency-
medicine.php
660 South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8116 St. Louis Missouri 63110 (314) 454-2558 (314) 454-4345 http://pediatrics.wustl.edu/emergency/fellowship
Department of 901 Rancho Lane, Las Vegas Nevada 89106 (702) 383-7885 (702) 366-8545 https://www.lasvegasemr.com/pem-
Emergency Medicine Suite 135 fellowship.html
201 Lyons Avenue Newark New Jersey 07112 (973) 926-6671 (973) 282-0562 https://www.rwjbh.org/for-healthcare-
professionals/medical-education/newark-
beth-israel-medical-center/pediatric-
emergency-medicine-fellowship/
100 Madison Avenue Box #8 Morristown New Jersey 07960 (973) 971-7926 (973) 290-7202 https://www.atlantichealth.org/morristown/for+
professionals/residents+&+fellows/residency+
programs/emergency+medicine/
fellowships/pediatric+emergency+medicine
1 University of New Mexico MSC11 6025 Albuquerque New Mexico 87131 (505) 272-6052 (505) 272-6503 https://emed.unm.edu/pem/education/
emergency-medicine-fellowship.html
965 48th Street Brooklyn New York 11219 (718) 283-6290 (718) 635-7228 https://www.maimonidesmed.org/emergency-medicine/
fellowships/pediatric-emergency-medicine-
fellowship/overview-pediatric-emergency
506 6th Street Brooklyn New York 11215 (718) 780-5040 (718) 780-3153 https://www.nyp.org/brooklyn/medical-education/
fellowship-training-programs/pediatric-emergency-
medicine-fellowship-program-
111 East 210th Street Bronx New York 10467 (718) 920-5312 (718) 798-6485 https://www.cham.org/specialties-and-programs/
emergency-medicine/education-training https://
virtualtour.montefiore.org/cham-pediatrics-
fellowship?_ga=2.186087136.873230537.
1609787036-1469875961.1609787036
1001 Main Street 5th floor Buffalo New York 14203 (716) 323-0222 (716) 323-0293 http://medicine.buffalo.edu/pediatrics/
education/fellowships/emergency.html
269-01 76th Avenue New Hyde New York 11040 (718) 470-5277 (718) 470-3935 https://professionals.northwell.edu/graduate-medical-
Park education/fellowship-pediatric-emergency-medicine-
cohen-childrens-medical-center
622 West 168th Street PH2-210 New York New York 10032 (212) 305-8536 (212) 305-6792 https://www.emergencymedicine.columbia.
edu/pediatric-emergency-medicine-
fellowship
Department of One Gustave L. Levy New York New York 10029 (212) 241-8069 (212) 241-1946 https://icahn.mssm.edu/education/
Emergency Medicine Place, Box 1149 residencies-fellowships/list/pediatric-
emergency-fellowship
525 East 68th Street Box #179 New York New York 10065 (212) 746-0780 (212) 746-4883 https://pediatrics.weill.cornell.edu/education/
fellowships/pediatric-emergency-medicine-
fellowship
462 First Avenue 8th fllor New York New York 10016 (212) 263-2693 (212) 562-7752 https://med.nyu.edu/emergency/education/
fellowships/acgme-accredited-
fellowships/pem-fellowships
601 Elmwood Avenue Box #655 Rochester New York 14642 (585) 273-4244 (585) 473-3516 https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/education/
graduate-medical-education/prospective-
fellows/pediatric-emergency-medicine.aspx
1400 Pelham Parkway Room 1B-25 Bronx New York 10461 (718) 918-5826 (718) 918-7459 https://jacobipem.org/fellowship/
450 Clarkson Avenue Box #1228 Brooklyn New York 11203-2098 (718) 270-4442 (718) 245-4799 http://pem.clinicalmonster.com/
550 East Genessee Street Syracuse New York 13210 (315) 464-6222 (315) 464-6229 https://www.upstate.edu/emergency/education/
fellowships/peds.php
1000 Blythe Boulevard MEB 3rd Floor, Department Charlotte North Carolina 28203 (704) 355-4212 (704) 355-7047 https://atriumhealth.org/education/graduate-medical-
of Emergency Medicine education/physician-fellowships/emergency-
medicine/pediatric-emergency-medicine
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 241
Cincinnati Children's Michelle Eckerle, michelle.eckerle@cchmc.org Paria Wilson, MD, Med paria.wilson@cchmc.org Amy Flaherty amy.flaherty@cchmc.org
Hospital Medical Center MD, MPH
Rainbow Babies Jerri Rose, jerri.rose@uhhospitals.org Megan Evers, MD megan.evers@uhhospitals.org Maura Dooley maura.dooley@uhhospitals.org
and Children's Hospital MD, FAAP
Nationwide Kristin Stukus, MD kristin.stukus@nationwide Jennifer Mitzman, jennifer.mitzman@ Tammy Reiss tammy.reiss@nationwidechildrens.org
Children's Hospital childrens.org MD Julia Lloyd, MD nationwidechildrens.
org julia.lloyd@
nationwidechildrens.org
University of Oklahoma Amanda Bogie, amanda-bogie@ouhsc.edu Ryan McKee, MD ryan-mckee@ouhsc.edu Karen Willbanks karen-willbanks@ouhsc.edu
College of Medicine MD
Oregon Health & Science Jessica Bailey, MD bailejes@ohsu.edu yue@ohsu.edu Arige El-Naser elnaser@ohsu.edu
University Randall Esther Yue, MD
Children's Hospital
St. Christopher's Evan Weiner, MD ejw33@drexel.edu Luis Gamboa, MD llg54@drexel.edu Kim Abrams kimberly.abrams@towerhealth.org
Hospital for Children
Children's Hospital Richard Scarfone, scarfone@email.chop.edu Pamela Fazzio, MD fazziop@email.chop.edu Julia Swanson swansonjl@email.chop.edu
of Philadelphia MD
UPMC Children's Melissa Tavarez, melissa.tavarez2@chp.edu Jane Soung, MD jane.soung@chp.edu Danielle Harvey danielle.harvey3@chp.edu
Hospital of Pittsburg MD
Montreal Children's Hospital Raphael Paquin, MD raphael.paquin@mcgill.ca John Batt pediatricemergencymed@mcgill.ca
CHU Sainte-Justine Hospital Marisol Sanchez soleil.sanchez@gmail.com Julie Korzeniewski julie.korzeniewski@sss.gouv.qc.ca
Montreal University
Hasbro Children's Hospital Elizabeth Jacobs, elizabeth_jacobs@brown.edu Lauren Allister, MD lauren_allister@brown.edu Wendy Wesley wwesley@lifespan.org
Warren Alpert Medical MD
School of Brown University
Medical University of South M. Olivia Titus, MD titusda@musc.edu Ian Kane, MD kanei@musc.edu Ingrid Schneider schneider@musc.edu
Carolina Program
University of Tennessee Le Bonheur Mindy Longjohn, mindylongjohn@gmail.com Rick Hanna, MD rhanna3@gmail.com April Smith asmit359@uthsc.edu
Children's Medical Center MD, MPH
Vanderbilt University Medical Daisy Ciener, daisy.a.ciener@vumc.org Rebekah Shaw rebekah.shaw@vumc.org
Center Monroe Carell Jr. MD, MS
Children's Hospital
at Vanderbilt
The University of Texas Coburn Allen, MD challen@ascension.org Sujit Iyer, MD ssiyer@ascension.org Irene Teeler iteeler@seton.org
at Austin Dell
Medical School
UT Southwestern Medical Jo-Ann jo-ann.nesiama@ Sing-Yi Feng, MD sing-yi.feng@utsouthwestern.edu Kevin Lynch kevin.lynch@utsouthwestern.edu
Center at Dallas Nesiama, MD utsouthwestern.edu
Baylor College of Medicine Esther Sampayo, emsampay@texaschildrens.org Kim Little-Wienert, MD, MEd kjlittle@texaschildrens.org Margo LaTour mlatour@bcm.edu
Texas Children's Hospital MD, MPH Marideth Rus, MD, MEd mcrus@texaschildrens.org
242 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
125 Doughty Street MSC 561 Charleston South Carolina 29425 (843) 792-0269 (843) 792-3022 https://medicine.musc.edu/departments/
pediatrics/fellowship/emergency-medicine
Division of 50 North Dunlap Street Memphis Tennessee 38103 (901) 287-5265 (901) 287-5062 http://www.uthsc.edu/pediatrics/emergency/
Emergency Services
2200 Children's Way VCH B-319 Nashville Tennessee 37232-9001 (615) 936-7317 (615) 936-4392 https://pediatrics.mc.vanderbilt.edu/interior.
php?mid=5770
4900 Mueller Boulevard Austin Texas 78723 (512) 324-0093 (512) 324-5872 https://dellmed.utexas.edu/education/
academics/graduate-medical-education/
pediatric-emergency-medicine-fellowship
1935 Medical E2.03 Dallas Texas 75235 (214) 456-2014 (214) 456-8132 https://www.utsouthwestern.edu/education/medical-
District Drive school/departments/pediatrics/divisions/
emergency-medicine/fellow-education/
6621 Fannin Street Suite A.2210 Houston Texas 77030 (832) 824-5497 (832) 825-1125 https://www.bcm.edu/departments/pediatrics/sections-
divisions-centers/emergency-medicine/education/
pediatric-emergency-medicine
6431 Fannin Street JJL270 Houston Texas 77030 (713) 301-4136 (713) 500-7412 https://med.uth.edu/emergencymedicine/sections/
pediatric-emergency-medicine/
295 Chipeta Way PO Box 581289 Salt Lake City Utah 84158 (801) 587-7435 (801) 587-7455 https://medicine.utah.edu/pediatrics/
pediatric_emergency_medicine/
fellowship/
Pediatric Emergency 3300 Gallows Road Falls Church Virginia 22042 (703) 776-7834 (703) 776-4323 https://www.inova.org/education/gme/altieri-
Department pediatric-emergency-medicine-
fellowship
Division of Emergency PO Box 1980 601 Norfolk Virginia 23507 (757) 668-9220 https://www.evms.edu/pediatrics/fellowships/
Medicine Children's Lane emergency_medicine/
1250 East Marshall Street 2nd floor, Suite 500 Richmond Virginia 23298-0401 (804) 828-5250 (804) 828-4603 https://emergencymedicine.vcu.edu/residency_
PO Box 980401 fellowships/fellowships/pediatric_
em/index.html
4800 Sand Point Way NE Mailstop MB.7.520 Seattle Washington 98105 (206) 987-7074 (206) 729-3070 http://www.peds.uw.edu/fellowships/
emergency-medicine-fellowship
Children's Corporate Center 999 Suite C550 Wauwatosa Wisconsin 53226 (414) 266-2625 (414) 266-2635 https://www.mcw.edu/departments/pediatrics/divisions/
North 92nd Street emergency-medicine/Fellowship
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 243
e152 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e153
(3.6%) were hospitalized for observation. It was observed that the drug. Patients receiving 2 or 3 drugs represented 26% of the
cause of emergency admission for 211 patients (12.3%) was at group, whereas 2 patients were receiving 5 or more types of med-
least 1 ADE. Figure 1 shows the process for patient inclusion, icines (1.0%; maximum, 6).
and Table 2 describes the characteristics of the patients studied The therapeutic classes of drugs involved in ADEs are shown
(general population, non-ADE population, and ADE population). in Table 3. The top 5 classes involved in pediatric emergency unit-
The largest number of ADEs occurred in patients who were related ADEs were as follows: respiratory system, nervous system,
in the 0 to 5 years age group, were female, were Caucasian, and anti-infectives for systemic use, dermatological drugs, and alimen-
had infectious disease. The most frequent disorders found in tary tract and metabolism. The main ADE-causing drugs were
children with ADEs were in the respiratory, dermatological, dexchlorpheniramine (5.8%), prednisolone (5.1%), and fenoterol
and neurological categories. (4.1%) in the respiratory system class; metamizole sodium (7.5%)
In this study, 292 events occurred in the 211 patients, related and paracetamol (5.1%) in the nervous system class; amoxicillin
to 292 drugs. Most (72.0%) of the patients were taking only 1 (10.3%) in the anti-infectives for systemic use class; ketoconazole
(2.4%) in the dermatological class; and finally, bromopride (1.0%)
in the alimentary tract class.
Regarding ADE type, medication errors were the most fre-
quent, followed by therapeutic ineffectiveness and ADRs (Table 4).
There were no ADEs due to drug abuse, quality deviations, or ADRs
from unapproved use of medicines.
Forty-seven patients (2.7% of the general population; 22.3%
of the ADE population) were noncompliant, 20 of whom were
noncompliant owing to treatment discontinuation once the patient
felt better. Regarding inappropriate use (98 patients, 5.7% of the
general population; 46.5% of the ADE population), 35 patients
did not need the drug being used and 26 patients used a lower dos-
age than that which was prescribed.
A higher occurrence of ADEs of mild severity was observed
FIGURE 1. Patient inclusion process. *These patients were not
assessed because there was no clinical pharmacist present at the (75.3%), followed by moderate (23.0%) and severe (1.7%). There
time the patient was admitted, or because they were hospitalized at were no detected fatal events. Regarding ADRs, by studying the
respiratory and contact isolation (patients with suspected causality, only 1 case (2.3%) could be considered defined. Most
meningitis and pertussis), or the caregivers did not allow their cases were determined to have probable causality (47.7%), followed
participation in the study. by cases classified as possible (43.2%) and doubtful (13.6%).
e154 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Characteristics General Population (n* = 1708) Non-ADE Population (n* = 1497) ADE Population (n* = 211)
Age, mean ± SD, y 4.6 ± 3.9 4.6 ± 3.9 4.9 ± 3.9
Age group, n* (%), y
0–5 1091 (63.9) 961 (64.2) 130 (61.6)
6–9 354 (20.7) 309 (20.6) 45 (21.3)
10–15 254 (14.9) 218 (14.6) 36 (17.1)
Not informed 9 (0.5) 9 (0.6) 0 (0.0)
Sex, n* (%)
Male 917 (53.7) 814 (54.4) 103 (48.8)
Female 791 (46.3) 683 (45.6) 108 (51.2)
Ethnicity group, n* (%)
Caucasian 1236 (72.4) 1084 (72.4) 152 (72.0)
Non-Caucasian 427 (25.0) 377 (25.2) 51 (24.2)
Not informed 45 (2.6) 36 (2.4) 8 (3.8)
Diagnosis,† n* (%)
Infectious 893 (52.3) 789 (52.7) 104 (49.3)
Gastrointestinal 172 (10.1) 159 (10.6) 13 (6.2)
Respiratory 114 (6.7) 83 (5.5) 31 (14.7)
Dermatological 113 (6.6) 66 (4.4) 27 (12.8)
Neurological 42 (2.5) 26 (1.7) 16 (7.6)
Bone and joint disorders 29 (1.7) 26 (1.7) 3 (1.4)
Renal 15 (0.9) 13 (0.9) 2 (0.9)
Other‡ 295 (17.3) 285 (19.0) 10 (4.7)
*n = absolute number.
†
Only the 8 most common diagnoses were selected. The diagnoses urologic (n = 5), otolaryngological (n = 5), hematologic (n = 5), endocrinologic
(n = 5), psychiatric (n = 3), oncologic (n = 3), immunologic (n = 2), nutritional (n = 2), cardiovascular (n = 2), ophthalmic (n = 2), and gynecologic disorders
(n = 1) do not appear in the table.
‡
Other diseases: congenital diseases, fractures, returns, genetic diseases, insertion of foreign bodies into the respiratory tract, ingestion of toxic sub-
stances, hernias, and problems with probes.
The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the risk within the Brazilian pediatric population. Moreover, there are no
of some ADEs may have been influenced by factors such as diag- published international papers with designs similar to that of this
nosis and therapeutic class, as shown in Table 5. study, that is, a prospective design, with a clinical pharmacist an-
alyzing several types of ADEs to determine the frequency of pedi-
DISCUSSION atric emergency admissions due to this ADEs. In a literature
The extent of ADE-related emergency unit admission has not review, Zed et al22 evaluated studies of medication-related emer-
been previously described by well-designed studies conducted gency department admissions in pediatric patients: of 7 studies,
only 1 had a prospective design.16 Comparisons with previous lit-
erature are therefore difficult and will here focus on the study by
TABLE 3. Therapeutic Classes Associated With ADE-Induced Easton-Carter et al.16
Admissions to a Pediatric Emergency Unit The results of this study demonstrate that ADEs are common
in pediatric patients. The prevalence of ADEs was 12.3%, which
Therapeutic Classes (ATC) n (%) is higher than previously reported values. Zed et al22 showed that
the incidence of medication-related pediatric emergency department
Respiratory system (R) 81 (27.7) visits ranged from 0.5% to 3.3% of total visits (only the prospective
Nervous system (N) 72 (24.7) study observed that 3.3% of pediatric emergency department visits
Anti-infectives for systemic use (J) 65 (22.3) were medication related).16 This discrepancy seems to be due to the
Dermatologicals (D) 21 (7.2) study design previously described, as well as the presence of a clin-
Alimentary tract and metabolism (A) 15 (5.1) ical pharmacist identifying ADEs.
Others* 38 (13.0) The sex and age profile of the children admitted to the pediatric
Total 292 (100.0) emergency unit (general population) was consistent with the study by
Easton-Carter et al16; the majority of patients were male with a mean
ATC indicates Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification. age of 4 years. However, whereas Easton-Carter et al16 observed a
*Includes M, muscle-skeletal system; S, sensory organs; H, systemic statistically significant prevalence of males in the ADE population,
hormonal preparations—excluding sex hormones and insulins; L, anti- our study showed roughly equal proportions of both sexes in this
neoplastic and immunomodulating agents; B, blood and blood forming
organs; P, antiparasitic products, insecticides, and repellents; G, genito-
population, with a slightly greater frequency of females.
urinary system and sex hormones; C, cardiovascular system. The most frequent ADE observed in this study was medica-
tion error, particularly the inappropriate use of drugs. This mainly
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e155
TABLE 4. ADE Classes in Relation to the General Population and the ADE Population, With Case Examples
occurred when patients did not need the drugs being administered showed that compliance was significantly higher (82%) for the
or when patients administered a lower dosage than that which was shorter therapy, compared with the longer course, with only 74%
prescribed. The findings of Zed et al22 and Easton-Carter et al16 compliance. Among children receiving antibiotics for the longer
support our results. Zed et al22 showed that the most common time period, compliance was significantly higher (79%) for days 0
ADE-induced emergency visits and hospital admissions were to 5 compared with days 6 to 10 (57%).44 Compliance with a treat-
due to patients receiving drugs despite having no indication for ment plan is lower still in cases of chronic diseases, such as juvenile
the use of those drugs (17.2–36.2%). Easton-Carter et al16 found diabetes and asthma, that require complex therapy for long time
that the primary cause of ADE-induced pediatric emergency periods.45 Studies show that parents forget around half of the in-
visits was ADRs (42.1%), followed by patients taking drugs for formation provided by 15 minutes after consultation with the doc-
which there was no valid medical indication (accidental or inten- tor, recalling the first third of the guidance and remembering more
tional poisoning, 33.2%). about the diagnosis that the details of the treatment plan.46
There was a high frequency of therapy noncompliance in this For many years, pediatric ADRs have been a significant pub-
study. A systematic review of international pediatric studies from lic health problem.47 These were the third most frequent ADE in
low- and middle-income countries reported variability in the prev- our study, with a count almost half of the number found in the
alence of antiretroviral therapy compliance. Figures ranged between study reported by Easton-Carter et al (42.1%).16 The data found
49% and 100%, with 76% of studies reporting greater than 75% for causality of ADRs using the Naranjo algorithm differ from
adherence.43 Easton-Carter et al16 only observed 8.9% noncom- those found in other studies. Posthumus et al48 found that, although
pliance (patients who experienced an ADE that was the result of 15 patients were admitted owing to ADRs (patients were not ex-
not receiving the prescribed drug), a lower frequency than was ob- posed to chemotherapy), 66.7% of cases were rated as having prob-
served by us. A study of children aged 0.5 to 5 years treated for able causality, 20.0% as possible causality, and 13.3% as defined
pneumococcal infection with amoxicillin for either 5 or 10 days causality: no doubtful ADRs were observed. Easton-Carter et al16
TABLE 5. Influence of Patient and Therapy-Related Risk Factors on ADEs—Only Statistically Significant Results are Shown Here
Odds Ratio
ADE Factor Risk (Covariate) (95% CI) Interpretation
Any ADE Diagnosis Neurological disorder 4.63 (2.38–8.99) The risk of children with neurological disorder
who have an ADE-induced emergency
unit admission is increased 4.63-fold.
Dermatological disorder 3.16 (1.93–5.18) The risk of children with dermatological disorder
who have an ADE-induced emergency unit
admission is increased 3.16-fold.
Respiratory disorder 3.02 (1.89–4.83) The risk of children with respiratory disorder
who have an ADE-induced emergency unit
admission is increased 3.02-fold.
ADR Diagnosis Dermatological disorder 6.41 (2.48–16.55) The risk of children with dermatological disorder
who have an ADR-induced emergency unit
admission is increased 6.41-fold.
Therapeutic class Nervous System (N) 68.67 (8.01–588.81) The risk of children using a nervous system drugs
who have an ADR-induced emergency unit
admission is increased 68.67-fold.
Noncompliance Diagnosis Respiratory disorder 4.71 (1.95–11.38) The risk of children with respiratory disorder who
have a noncompliance-induced emergency unit
admission is increased 4.71-fold.
CI indicates confidence interval.
e156 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
used the causality assessment for overall ADEs and not only for committed to information, communication, and education related
ADRs. These researchers observed defined ADEs in 37.9% of to the rational use of drugs in pediatrics. Thus, our study empha-
cases, probable ADEs in 30.4%, and possible ADEs in 31.8%. sizes the importance of action of clinical pharmacists through
Our results for ADE severity were slightly different to those pharmaceutical care and clinical pharmacy practice. Along with
in the studies found by Zed et al.22 We found a prevalence of mild the clinical team, clinical pharmacists should guide and intervene
severity, followed by moderate and severe severity, but in other in the correct use of drugs, report ADEs to health surveillance
studies, approximately one half of ADEs reported were identified groups, detect and solve real ADEs, and prevent possible ADEs,
as being moderate, followed by mild and severe events. For exam- with the aim to improve the welfare of pediatric patients and re-
ple, moderate ADEs were present in 42.1% of cases in the study duce the cost to the public health system.
reported by Easton-Carter et al.16 The present results have limitations, as the study was carried
Respiratory agents are involved in 10.6% to 35.0% of ADE- out at a single center and did not assess other relevant aspects such
induced pediatric hospital admissions and emergency visits17,49 as the preventability of ADEs; costs; licensing status of medicines;
and central nervous system agents in 3.5% to 17.5%.17,18,21,49,50 characteristics of parents or caregivers, including socioeconomic
In the present study, the ADE frequency observed for respiratory status; follow-up of patients who experienced ADEs; and the lack
agents was as expected based on the percentages cited previously, of information about medicines used by the non-ADE population.
and this was the major ADE-inducing therapeutic class. This was Other limitations include the potential bias involved in the phar-
also found by Martínez-Mir et al49 in their study of ADRs leading macist declaring an event an ADE, recall bias of the family, and
to pediatric hospital admission. The anti-allergy drug dexchlorphe- the fact that the sample used was only a subset of the total patients
niramine was the most frequent cause of ADEs in this therapeutic admitted to the pediatric emergency unit.
class. Similarly, Easton-Carter et al16 observed that chlorphenir- The results presented in this study demonstrate a high fre-
amine was 1 of the 12 most frequent causes of ADEs. Nervous quency of ADE-related admissions to the pediatric emergency
system drugs were the second most common cause of ADEs unit in a public teaching hospital of Brazil. The chance of being
and were associated with ADEs at a slightly higher frequency than admitted to the pediatric emergency unit for any ADE increased
those found in other studies. This is because we observed cases in cases of neurological, dermatological, and respiratory disorders.
where ADEs were induced by the analgesic metamizole sodium, Clinical pharmacists play an important role in the identification of
which is banned in many countries. Furthermore, paracetamol ADEs and the education of children's caregivers and health profes-
was also a prevalent cause of ADEs, both here and in the findings sionals about pediatric medication and may be part of the pediatric
of Easton-Carter et al.16 In a review by Smyth et al,51 antiepilep- multidisciplinary team. More information and well-designed pro-
tics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were therapeutic spective studies in pediatric drug safety are essential. These should
classes frequently associated with ADRs causing pediatric hospital be encouraged in Brazil and other countries to portray the situation
admission. For antiepileptics, the studies reported clinical presen- surrounding ADEs, and to draw attention to the adoption of preven-
tations involving ataxia, skin rash, and drowsiness; and for non- tive and resolutive public policies.
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cutaneous reactions, drowsiness,
abdominal pain, and vomiting.51 These symptoms were also present ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
in the pediatric patients observed by us. Care should be taken The authors would like to acknowledge the School of Medi-
with these medications in pediatric settings, mainly owing to cal Sciences and Hospital of Clinics of University of Campinas.
their association with a higher chance of ADR-induced pediatric
emergency visits.
REFERENCES
Adverse drug events caused by antibiotics are usually related
to unnecessary use, noncompliance, and ADRs. Most studies re- 1. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and
ported antibiotics to be the most common ADE-inducing therapeutic negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice
class, which accounted for 25.0% to 60.3% of pediatric medication- Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–376.
related emergency unit visits and hospital admissions21,46,49 and was 2. World Health Organization. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance. Safety
associated with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and skin rash.51 Our find- Monitoring of medicinal products. Available at: http://apps.who.int/
ings showed an ADE frequency of slightly below 25% for this class, medicinedocs/pdf/s4893e/s4893e.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2016.
and anti-infectives for systemic use, was a third therapeutic class 3. Nebeker JR, Barach P, Samore MH. Clarifying adverse drug events: a
more frequent. However, in an individual analysis of drugs, amoxicil- clinician's guide to terminology, documentation, and reporting. Ann Intern
lin was the most prevalent medicine in cases of ADEs. Certainly, Med. 2004;140:795–801.
amoxicillin use in childhood has been associated with many cases 4. Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, et al. Adverse drug events in
of ADEs and was also one of the most prevalent causes of ADEs hospitalized patients: excess length of stay, extra costs and attributable
in other studies.16,21 Therefore, more attention should be given when mortality. JAMA. 1997;277:301–306.
amoxicillin is prescribed and administered to pediatric patients. 5. Bates DW, Spell N, Cullen DJ, et al. The costs of adverse drug events in
Risk factors for ADEs included diagnoses of neurological, hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group.
dermatological, or respiratory disorders and the use of medicines JAMA. 1997;277:307–311.
that act on the nervous system. This is the first study showing
6. Johnson JA, Bootman JL. Drug-related morbidity and mortality. A
the analysis of these risk factors; therefore, comparison with other
cost-of-illness model. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1949–1956.
works is not possible.
To ensure adequate ADE monitoring, it is essential to include 7. Ernst FR, Grizzle AJ. Drug-related morbidity and mortality: updating the
practices and public policies that regulate this activity, which have cost-of-illness model. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001;41:192–199.
already been developed and implemented in several countries over 8. Zed PJ. Drug-related visits to the emergency department. J Pharm Pract.
the past few years. This study reveals the frequency of patients 2005;18:329–335.
admitted to the pediatric emergency unit owing to ADEs, indicat- 9. Kunac DL, Kennedy J, Austin N, et al. Incidence, preventability, and
ing that this age group deserves attention. Fourteen years ago, impact of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and potential ADEs in hospitalized
Impicciatore et al47 had already stated that pediatricians, clinical children in New Zealand: a prospective observational cohort study.
pharmacologists, and other child care professionals should be Paediatr Drugs. 2009;11:153–160.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e157
10. Star K, Edwards IR. Pharmacovigilance for children's sake. Drug Saf. 31. Meyboom RH, Lindquist M, Flygare AK, et al. The value of reporting
2014;37:91–98. Therapeutic Ineffectiveness as an Adverse Drug Reaction. Drug Saf. 2000;
11. Zandieh SO, Goldmann DA, Keohane CA, et al. Risk factors in preventable 23:95–99.
adverse drug events in pediatric outpatients. J Pediatr. 2008;152:225–231. 32. US Food and Drug Administration. Drug Interactions: What You Should
12. Yin HS, Mendelsohn AL, Wolf MS, et al. Parents' medication Know. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/
administration errors: role of dosing instruments and health literacy. Arch ResourcesForYou/UCM163355.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2016.
Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164:181–186. 33. Uges DR. What is the definition of a poisoning? J Clin Forensic Med.
13. Frush KS, Luo X, Hutchinson P, et al. Evaluation of a method to reduce 2001;8:30–33.
over-the-counter medication dosing error. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004; 34. World Health Organization. WHO Expert Committee on Drug
158:620–624. Dependence — WHO Technical Report Series, No. 915 — Thirty-third
14. Condren M, Studebaker IJ, John BM. Prescribing errors in a pediatric Report. Available at: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/s4896e/s4896e.
clinic. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010;49:49–53. pdf. Accessed July 12, 2016.
15. Smith KM, McAdams JW, Frenia ML, et al. Drug-related problems in 35. Visacri MB, de Souza CM, Sato CM, et al. Adverse Drug Reactions and
emergency department patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997;54: quality deviations monitored by spontaneous reports. Saudi Pharm J. 2015;
295–298. 23:130–137.
16. Easton-Carter KL, Chapman CB, Brien JE. Emergency department 36. US Food and Drug Administration. Understanding Unapproved Use of
attendances associated with drug-related problems in paediatrics. Approved Drugs “Off Label”. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/
J Paediatr Child Health. 2003;39:124–129. ForPatients/Other/OffLabel/ucm20041767.htm. Accessed July 12, 2016.
17. Cohen AL, Budnitz DS, Weidenbach KN, et al. National surveillance of 37. Morisky DE, Levine DM, Green LW, et al. Health education program
emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events in children effects on the management of hypertension in the elderly. Arch Intern Med.
and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2008;152:416–421. 1982;142:1835–1838.
18. Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Valim C, et al. Pediatric adverse drug events 38. Micromedex® Healthcare Series [database online]. Thomson Micromedex.
in the outpatient setting: an 11-year national analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Available at: http://micromedex.com/; 2012. Updated 2012.
Drug Saf. 2010;19:901–910.
39. Carvalho IV, Carnevale RC, Visacri MB, et al. Drug interaction between
19. Schillie SF, Shehab N, Thomas KE, et al. Medication overdoses leading to
phenytoin and valproic acid in a child with refractory epilepsy: a case
emergency department visits among children. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:
report. J Pharm Pract. 2014;27:214–216.
181–187.
40. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics
20. Phan H, Leder M, Fishley M, et al. Off-label and unlicensed medication use
Methodology. ATC/DDD Index 2017. Available at: http://www.whocc.no/
and associated adverse drug events in a pediatric emergency department.
atc_ddd_index/. Accessed December 15, 2016.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010;26:424–430.
21. Sikdar KC, Alaghehbandan R, Macdonald D, et al. Adverse drug events 41. Coêlho HL, Arrais PS, Gomes AP. Ceará State Pharmacovigilance System:
among children presenting to a hospital emergency department in a year of experience. Cad Saude Publica. 1999;15:631–640.
Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 42. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the
2010;19:132–140. probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:
22. Zed PJ, Haughn C, Black KJ, et al. Medication-related emergency 239–245.
department visits and hospital admissions in pediatric patients: a qualitative 43. Vreeman RC, Wiehe SE, Pearce EC, et al. A systematic review of pediatric
systematic review. J Pediatr. 2013;163:477–483. adherence to antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries.
23. Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, Kraus DM, eds. Pediatric & Neonatal Dosage Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:686–691.
Handbook with International Trade Names Index. Hudson, NY: Lexicomp; 44. Schrag SJ, Peña C, Fernández J, et al. Effect of short-course, high-dose
2011. eds. amoxicillin therapy on resistant pneumococcal carriage: a randomized trial.
24. Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA). Electronic central of JAMA. 2001;286:49–56.
package inserts. Available at: http://www4.anvisa.gov.br/
45. Borus JS, Laffel L. Adherence challenges in the management of type 1
BularioEletronico/. Accessed July 12, 2016.
diabetes in adolescents: prevention and intervention. Curr Opin Pediatr.
25. Barros E, Barros HMT, eds. Medicamentos na Prática Clínica. São Paulo, 2010;22:405–411.
SP: Artmed; 2010. eds.
46. Lewin AB, Heidgerken AD, Geffken GR, et al. The relation between family
26. DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, et al, eds. Pharmacotherapy: factors and metabolic control: the role of diabetes adherence. J Pediatr
A Pathophysiologic Approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; Psychol. 2006;31:174–183.
2011. eds.
47. Impicciatore P, Choonara I, Clarkson A, et al. Incidence of adverse drug
27. DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, et al, eds. Pharmacotherapy: reactions in paediatric in/out-patients: a systematic review and
A Pathophysiologic Approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:77–83.
2014. eds.
48. Posthumus AA, Alingh CC, Zwaan CC, et al. Adverse drug
28. Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA). Resolution N° 4, reaction-related admissions in paediatrics, a prospective single-centre study.
February 10, 2009. Available at: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/ BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000934.
anvisa/2009/res0004_10_02_2009.html. Accessed July 12, 2016.
49. Martínez-Mir I, García-López M, Palop V, et al. A prospective study of
29. World Health Organization. Adherence to Long-term Therapies: Evidence
adverse drug reactions as a cause of admission to a paediatric hospital. Br J
for Action. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42682/1/
Clin Pharmacol. 1996;42:319–324.
9241545992.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2016.
50. Lamabadusuriya SP, Sathiadas G. Adverse drug reactions in children
30. World Health Organization. Problems of Irrational Drug Use — Session
requiring hospital admission. Ceylon Med J. 2003;48:86–87.
Guide. Available at: http://archives.who.int/PRDUC2004/RDUCD/
Session_Guides/problems_of_irrational_drug_use.htm. 51. Smyth RMD, Gargon E, Kirkham J, et al. Adverse drug reactions in
Accessed July 12, 2016. children — a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e24061.
e158 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com e159
e160 www.pec-online.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
CONCLUSION
Patients referred for DMST involvement had high rates of
alcohol/substance use, parental substance use, and/or positive
urine toxicology results yielding several important points. First,
adolescents who use/abuse substances may have a propensity to-
ward risk-taking behaviors such as sex trafficking; thus, substance
use/abuse may be a risk factor for and indicator of sex-trafficking
involvement, which should prompt clinicians to screen for and ed-
ucate about DMST in a substance using patient population. Second,
minors who have parents who abuse substances come from dys-
functional environments and poor support systems and there-
fore may be more susceptible to engage in high-risk behaviors
(eg, sexual exploitation, substance use). Third, a youth's depen-
FIGURE 2. Urine toxicology screen and results. A, Positive and dency on drugs and the perpetuation of addiction may be a
negative results represent the 50.7% of patients who had a urine method in which traffickers maintain control over their victims.
toxicology screening at the initial evaluation for DMST involvement.
B, Positive and negative results represent the 41.8% of patients
Given the link between DMST and substance use, specialized
who had a urine toxicology screening a year prior to their initial substance abuse treatment programs and education should be a
evaluation for DMST involvement. component of the multidisciplinary approach to caring for the
multifaceted needs of these vulnerable youth.
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e161
8. Raymond JG, Hughes DM. International and Domestic Trends in Sex 11. Edwards JM, Iritani BJ, Hallfors DD. Prevalence and correlates of
Trafficking of Women in the United States, 1999–2000. Ann Arbor, MI: exchanging sex for drugs or money among adolescents in the United States.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]; Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:354–358.
2006. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03438.v1. 12. Yates GL, MacKenzie RG, Pennbridge J, et al. A risk profile comparison of
9. Kennedy MA, Klein C, Bristowe JTK, et al. Routes of recruitment into homeless youth involved in prostitution and homeless youth not involved.
prostitution. J Aggression Maltreat Trauma. 2007;15:1–19. J Adolesc Health. 1991;12:545–548.
10. Stoltz JA, Shannon K, Kerr T, et al. Associations between childhood 13. Violence Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available
maltreatment and sex work in a cohort of drug-using youth. Soc Sci Med. at: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/acestudy/index.html.
2007;65:1214–1221. Published April 1, 2016. Accessed January 16, 2018.
e162 www.pec-online.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com e163
e164 www.pec-online.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
FIGURE 1. The distribution of the duration of stay in the emergency service according to the number of siblings.
made in 8.1% (56), coagulation tests were made in 5.5% (38), and the stay durations of the cases who had no or only 1 sibling were
identification of the blood group was made in 0.6% (4) of the statistically significantly higher when compared with 5 or more
cases. When the consulted departments were investigated, it was siblings (P = 0.044, P = 0.015, respectively). The duration of stay
found that the most frequently consulted department was the Depart- of the cases with 1 sibling was statistically significantly higher
ment of Orthopedics and Traumatology with the rate of 33.0% (P < 0.05) than that of cases with 5 or more siblings (P = 0.015).
(227). The rates of consultations of other departments were 6.0% The results of the statistical analysis were shown in Figure 1.
(41) for neurosurgery, 3.6% (25) for pediatric surgery, 2.3% (16) The duration of stay in the emergency service showed statis-
for pediatrics, 1.2% (8) for otorhinolaryngology, and 0.3% (2) for tically significant difference regarding the trauma types (P = 0.001,
ophthalmology departments. P < 0.01). According to the results of Bonferroni-corrected Mann-
The mean ± SD duration of stay in the emergency service Whitney U paired comparisons made for identifying the group
was found as 122.01 ± 141.44 minutes, ranging from 1 to 1620 mi- that generated the difference, the average duration of stay of the
nutes, and the average fee for the total of provided services cases who had encountered a traffic accident was statistically sig-
was found as 85.48 ± 150.08 Turkish Lira (TL), ranging from 0 to nificantly increased (P < 0.01) when compared with the cases who
3438 TL. The duration of stay in the emergency service showed had encountered falling (P = 0.001), crash/collision (P = 0.001),
statistically significant differences regarding the number of the burn (P = 0.001), and other accidents (P = 0.001). The average du-
siblings (P = 0.001, P < 0.01). According to the paired compari- ration of stay of the cases who had presented to the emergency service
sons made for identifying the group that generated the difference, due to falling was statistically significantly increased (P < 0.01) when
FIGURE 2. The distribution of the duration of stay in the emergency service according to the trauma types.
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e165
FIGURE 3. The distribution of the trauma types according to the accident occurrence sites.
compared with the cases who had encountered crash/collision accident had occurred (P = 0.001, P < 0.01). According to the
(P = 0.002), burn (P = 0.001), and other accidents (P = 0.001). paired comparisons made for identifying the group that generated
The average duration of stay of the cases who had been admitted the difference, statistically significant increases in the rates of fall-
to the emergency service owing to crash/collision was statistically ing at other accident sites (P = 0.024), of crash/collision at the in-
significantly increased (P < 0.01) when compared with the cases house or street/playground accidents (P = 0.012), of traffic acci-
who had been admitted owing to burn trauma (P = 0.002) and dents at the street/playground accidents (P = 0.001), and of burns
other causes (P = 0.001). The results of the statistical analysis were at the in-house accidents (P = 0.038) were determined (P < 0.05).
shown in Figure 2. The results of the statistical analysis were shown in Figure 3.
The average duration of stay of the cases whose parents were The total service fees have statistically significant differences
unemployed was determined to be statistically significantly in- when compared regarding the trauma types (P = 0.009, P < 0.01).
creased when compared with those who had working parents According to the results of Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney
(P = 0.001, P < 0.01). U paired comparisons made for identifying the group that gener-
Statistically significant differences were determined between ated the difference, the average total service fee of the cases who
the trauma types when compared regarding the sites in which had encountered traffic accidents and had been admitted to the
e166 www.pec-online.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
FIGURE 5. The distribution of the average total service fee according to the occurrence sites of accidents.
emergency service was found to be statistically significantly the level of 40.2% (r = 0.402, P = 0.001, P < 0.01). Figure 6 shows
higher (P < 0.05) than of those who had encountered falling this positive correlation.
(P = 0.006), crash/collision (P = 0.005), burns (P = 0.043), and
other traumas (P = 0.010). The results of the statistical analysis LIMITATIONS
were shown in Figure 4. Total service fees show statistically signif- This study involved 2 major limitations. The first limitation
icant differences regarding the occurrence sites of the accident was that, although the sample size was quite large, it was possible
(P = 0.021; P < 0.05). According to the results of Bonferroni- to convey the results of the population living in the vicinity of our
corrected Mann-Whitney U paired comparisons made to identify hospital only. Because great variations are possible to occur among
the groups that created the difference, the average total service fees regions of a large city and country, we are unable to comment on the
of traumas occurring at home were found to be statistically signifi- pediatric trauma epidemiology in Istanbul and Turkey.
cantly lower when compared with traumas occurring at nurseries, The second limitation involved the health status of the
street/playground, and the other sites (P = 0.041, P < 0.05). The re- cases in the sample. Almost all patients were well regarding
sults of the statistical analysis were shown in Figure 5. A statistically their overall health status (99.4%) (only 4 patients had either
significant positive correlation was determined between the duration moderate or poor health status). This ratio was surprisingly
of stay in the emergency service and total service fee (increasing ser- high when trauma was considered as the diagnosis. However,
vice fee with increasing duration of stay in the emergency service) at it can also be considered that, because our emergency service
FIGURE 6. The correlation of total service fee with the duration of stay in the emergency service.
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e167
works with the policy of admitting every patient from its prox- children, our result was correlated to some degree with the result
imity, any child with a medical history of trauma presented of Claudet et al.12
even when no symptom or sign was present. There still may The trauma types in our series consisted mainly of falling
be doubt that our emergency service was used inappropriately from various places (64%). This result was consistent with most of
by the parents. This issue was emphasized by Chamberlain the studies published in the literature.6,10,13,14 However, there are
and Pollack4 in 1998, in their article on developing a method also studies having contradictory results when compared with ours.
for assessing emergency department performance. They found One study, conducted in 2002 in our country, found the highest rated
that 24% of their patients (including those with trauma) were trauma type as traffic accidents (46%),15 whereas Kundal et al16 also
inappropriately admitted. determined that the highest score (60%) belonged to road traffic ac-
cidents in males. One thing worth mentioning in Kundal's study16
was that, although more rarely met, the trauma seen in females
DISCUSSION was owing to falling in their series (52%). In 99.4% of the cases
Considering trauma as a coincidental event is not adequate (n = 684), there was a traumatized body region. Head and neck re-
from the epidemiological point of view. It should be considered gion was the most commonly affected site (51.0%). This result
as a condition created by various causing agents, showing variations was consistent with other published studies in which falls were
related to the causation between the agent, the host, and the environ- the dominant trauma type.17,18 However, in some studies in which
ment, thus necessitating investigation of the epidemiologic aspects.5 traffic accidents were rated higher, polytrauma injuries (involve-
We have found no epidemiological study related to emergency ment of more than 2 organ systems) and abdominal/extremity inju-
service admission conducted only on preschool-aged children in ries were determined to have higher incidences when compared
the literature, and the aim of our study was to determine the epide- with head trauma.16
miologic features of preschool-age trauma in an emergency service The most frequently used imaging technique was obtaining
and to investigate the interactions of the epidemiological factors direct x-ray images, and the second most commonly used technique
with the characteristics of the trauma victims and the trauma. was computed tomography. Surprisingly, ultrasonographic exami-
The results of our study revealed that females outnumbered nation, although easily available, was performed only in 11.2% of
males by a ratio of 1.4:1. cases. The reason for this order of imaging techniques might be
This result was not consistent with various epidemiologic the types of trauma encountered in our emergency service. In the
studies in the medical literature. Sharma et al6 reported a male/female study conducted by Güzel et al18 to evaluate their fall-related trauma
ratio of 1.9:1, and Aluisio et al7 reported the same ratio as 2.0:1. cases, their imaging techniques were reported to be in a similar order;
The cause of this inconsistency might be the difference in the however, their direct x-ray and ultrasonographic examination rates
age range between our study and the studies published in the medical were higher than ours (81% and 32%, respectively). These differ-
literature. While our study sample consisted of preschool-aged ences might have originated from their study sample being consti-
children, 52% of children in Sharma et al's study6 were attending tuted from only the cases who had encountered falling.
the school, and the age range in Aulisio et al's study7 was 6 to The average duration of emergency service stay was 122 mi-
13 years. We were unable to find any study investigating the par- nutes in our series. The statistically significant increase observed
ents' employment status of pediatric trauma victims in the literature. in the duration of stay of the patients having unemployed parents
A considerably low employment rate was found (74.6%) among in the emergency service can be explained by the time man-
parents of child trauma victims. The rate of unemployment was agement problem encountered by the working parents. Be-
calculated as 25.4%. The district that our emergency service was cause unemployed parents have less concern about the time
located was Istanbul, and the 2016 unemployment rate in Istanbul spent in the emergency service, they might not have felt obliged
was reported as 13.5% by Turkish Statistical Institute.8 Although to leave the emergency service early. The other statistically signifi-
the unemployment rate was not mentioned in the study conducted cant finding was related to the number of the siblings. The patients
by Marcin et al, 9 their result was quite supportive of ours. had most commonly either 2 or 3 siblings (33% each). We were un-
They investigated the socioeconomic disparities in morbidity and able to find any study investigating the number of the siblings of
mortality related to pediatric trauma and found that children child trauma patients. The significant reductions determined in
from communities with lower socioeconomic status had higher the duration of emergency service stay with 5 siblings or less can
injury hospitalization rates. A similar conclusion was reached by be explained with concerns of the parents about their children left
Fiorentino et al10; they concluded that socioeconomic factors such at home or elsewhere. They might have been unwilling to spend
as poverty, lack of health insurance, or poor maternal education time away from their other children and might have requested to
might be associated with a higher risk of trauma. In our series, leave the hospital if the absolute necessity for staying in the emer-
the high unemployment rate might have led to a lower income, gency service was not present when the number of their siblings
leading to disturbance in taking preventive measures against was 5 or more. The determined differences in stay duration regard-
trauma for children with unemployed parents. ing different types of trauma revealed that stay duration varied ac-
Almost all trauma patients were delivered to the emergency cording to the concerns of the emergency service staff and the
service by private vehicles (98.3%). A total of 112 emergency parents about the seriousness of the trauma. Although much rarer,
health care services has been used very rarely; 1.7% was a quite traffic accident as the cause of admission to the emergency service
surprisingly low rate because the inappropriate use of 112 emer- had led to a significant increase. This might have originated from
gency health care service system is very common in our country the time spent with consultations, investigations, and legal pur-
as indicated by a very recently conducted study by Kaynak et al.11 poses. It can be suggested that the number of consultations, inves-
In another study conducted by Claudet et al,12 the rate of transport tigations, and legal procedures can affect the duration of stay in
other than with the use of private vehicle was 47%. In that study, an the emergency service.
interesting point was that, although the overall use of ambulance The average total service fee was 85.48 TL. The significantly
had a high rate, as the patients' ages got smaller, the rate of delivery increased total service fee in traffic accidents when compared with
by private vehicles, driven by parents mostly, increased (76% of the other trauma types can be explained by an increased number of
the children younger than 2 years old vs 35% of those older than consultations, investigations, and legal procedures performed in
10 years old). Because our sample consisted of preschool-aged pediatric patients who have encountered traffic accidents. The site
e168 www.pec-online.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
that the trauma occurred was determined to have an impact on total 5. Hollwarth ME. Prevention of unintentional injuries: a global role for
service fee; the significantly lower fees in in-house traumas, when pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2013;132:4–7.
compared with the other sites, can be explained by the variations 6. Sharma M, Lahoti BK, Khandelwal G, et al. Epidemiological trends of
and distribution differences in the trauma types according to the pediatric trauma: a single-center study of 791 patients. J Indian Assoc
site of the accident. The statistically significant positive correlation Pediatr Surg. 2011;16:88–92.
determined between total service fee and the duration of emergency 7. Aluisio AR, Umuhire OF, Mbanjumucyo G, et al. Epidemiologic
service stay can be explained by investigations, consultations, and characteristics of pediatric trauma patients receiving prehospital care in
procedures requiring both time and money simultaneously; usually, Kigali, Rwanda. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017; doi: 10.1097/
the more extensive the procedures, the more time and money they PEC.0000000000001045.
necessitate, increasing both in correlation. 8. Karakaş M. Labour force Statistics, 2016. Ankara: Turkish Statistical
Our discharge rate (97.2%) was similar to the result of the Institute; 2017.
study conducted by Tambay et al14 in another Training and Research
9. Marcin JP, Schembri MS, He J, et al. A population-based analysis of
Hospital, located in Adana, Turkey (96%). However, the rates of
socioeconomic status and insurance status and their relationship with
transfer to another facility and hospitalization showed minor dis-
pediatric trauma hospitalization and mortality rates. Am J Public Health.
crepancies, such as 0.6% versus 0.1% for transfer and 2.2% versus 2003;93:461–466.
4.3% for hospitalization. These minor discrepancies can be explained
by variations in the admission and transfer policies of the hospitals, 10. Fiorentino JA, Molise C, Stach P, et al. Pediatric trauma. Epidemiological
study among patients admitted to Hospital de Niños “Ricardo Gutiérrez”.
although they follow similar rules under the supervision of the
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2015;113:12–20, I-V.
Turkish Ministry of Health.
In conclusion, the clinical and social epidemiology of pediat- 11. Kaynak MF, Gafurogullari S, Deniz ZE, et al. The analysis of the patients
ric trauma has not been thoroughly investigated throughout the taken to emergency service by 112 emergency healthcare services: a
world. When compared with several published studies performed prospective clinical study. Eur Res J. 2017; Early Online System.
on this subject, some of our results were consistent, whereas some 12. Claudet I, Bounes V, Federici S, et al. Epidemiology of admissions
issues such as the number of siblings have not been previously in a pediatric resuscitation room. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25:
studied in detail. Both the in-hospital and the social aspects of 312–316.
the environment should be improved to reduce the clinical and social 13. Kiser MM, Samuel JC, McLean SE, et al. Epidemiology of pediatric injury
burden related to trauma, keeping in mind that the best approach to in Malawi: burden of disease and implications for prevention. Int J Surg.
trauma is prevention. Further detailed multicenter clinical and social 2012;10:611–617.
epidemiological studies will shed light on the trauma problem and 14. Tambay G, Satar S, Kozaci N, et al. Retrospective analysis of pediatric
augment the efforts for reduction of its severity and prevention. trauma cases admitted to the emergency medicine department. JAEM.
2013;12:8–12.
15. Gurses D, Sarioglu-Buke A, Baskan M, et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of
REFERENCES trauma cases admitted to a pediatric emergency service. Ulus Travma Derg.
1. Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J, et al World Report on Child Injury 2002;8:156–159.
Prevention. Geneva: WHO; 2008. 16. Kundal VK, Debnath PR, Sen A. Epidemiology of pediatric trauma and its
2. Kemp A, Sibert J. Childhood accidents: epidemiology, trends, and pattern in urban India: a tertiary care hospital-based experience. J Indian
prevention. J Accid Emerg Med. 1997;14:316–320. Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2017;22:33–37.
3. Kassebaum N, Kyu HH, Zoeckler L, et al. Child and adolescent health from 17. Alyafei KA, Toaimah F, El Menyar A, et al. Analysis of pediatric trauma
1990 to 2015: findings from the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk data from a hospital based trauma registry in Qatar. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci.
factors 2015 study. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:573–592. 2015;5:21–26.
4. Chamberlain JM, Pollack MM. A method for assessing emergency 18. Guzel A, Karasalihoglu S, Kucukugurluoglu Y. Evaluation
department performance using patient outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. of the fall-related trauma cases applied to our pediatric emergency
1998;5:986–991. department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2007;13:211–216.
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e169
e170 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
Data Collection
The EMR (Cerner) was queried for each patient requiring a
behavioral response team activation in the postprotocol period
for the following information:
Patient information
Definitions
Any attempt at environmental or verbal calming was termed
“verbal deescalation.” This includes verbally attempting to calm
patient, changing environment, caregiver if needed, contacting re-
sources, such as recreational therapy, and so on. “Oral medications
administered” indicates that a patient voluntarily took oral medica-
tions targeting psychiatric symptoms or agitation (eg, olanzapine,
benzodiazepines, etc.). Medications, which were ordered, but re-
fused by the patients, were not counted.
Statistics
Descriptive statistics were performed. The difference in over-
all behavioral team activations, verbal deescalation and voluntary
pharmacologic deescalation attempts was compared between the
preprotocol period and the postprotocol period using the χ2 test.
The University of Southern California Institutional Review
Board approved this study with waiver of consent.
FIGURE 1. Guideline for management of agitation/aggression in
psychiatrically ill patients in the pediatric ED.
RESULTS
publications of Project BETA.15–17 The clinical pathway was pre- During the 13-month preprotocol period, there were 1465 total
sented to all attending ED physicians at faculty meeting, to nurses patients seen monthly in the PED and 31 patients (2.4 patients per
by the medical area director, and was made available to all providers month) requiring behavioral response team activations. During the
on the department “wiki” on all computer workstations at all times. 16-month postprotocol period, there were 1545 total patients seen
There were no additional changes made regarding acceptance, no monthly in the PED and 22 patients requiring behavioral team activa-
additional protocols, and no additional educational sessions regard- tions. Upon chart review, no notation or indication for a behavioral
ing psychiatric patients in the PED between the periods. team activation was noted in one patient. The 21 remaining
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e171
patients (1.3 patients per month) were included in the final analysis.
There was a significant decrease in activations following introduction TABLE 2. Features of the Behavioral Team Activations
of the protocol (P = 0.03). Demographic information about the
Postintervention Preintervention
preintervention and postintervention groups is presented in Table 1.
During the preprotocol period, verbal deescalation was doc- Activation within 1 h of 33.3% 50%
umented in 53% and voluntary pharmacologic in 3.2%. In the ED arrival
postprotocol period, verbal deescalation was attempted in 77.3% Verbal deescalation attempts 77.3% 53%
(P = 0.04) and voluntary pharmacologic in 14.3% (P = 0.18). In- Oral medication administered 14.3% 3.2%
formation about documented deescalation attempts and the behav- Physical restraints 81% 87.1%
ioral team activations is presented in Table 2. No adverse events to Patients with more than 1 team 7 6
the medications or restraints were noted. activation
Medications administered during 81% 74.2%
DISCUSSION team activation
The literature on safe and effective management of acute agi-
tation in the PED is nascent. Oral olanzapine and risperidone have
been shown to be as effective at agitation control as intramuscular decreased and verbal deescalation increased in the postprotocol
haloperidol,18,19 and olanzapine has been associated with minimal period, recurrent activations and percentage of patients requiring
adverse events.20 These studies support the safety and efficacy of physical restraint did not. Although literature on physical restraint
individual medication options in pediatric patients. However, to of pediatric patients is not extensive, both adverse physical and
our knowledge, this is the first study of the utility of a protocol ad- psychologic effects are associated with their use in patients over-
dressing different levels of agitation and emphasizing early admin- all, and experts advocate for less restrictive means when possi-
istration of oral medications. In this study, there was a 46% lower ble.21 Further interventions are required to target these areas.
rate of behavioral team activation in the postprotocol period. There are several limitations to the study. There is no institu-
Although an association between the initiation of the proto- tional policy providing oversight as to when the behavioral response
col and a reduction in behavioral response team activations does team should be activated; however, the provider-dependent nature
not prove causality, there were no other changes in providers or of activation applied similarly to each period. The retrospective de-
medication availability between the periods included. There are sign limits availability of information to the documentation in the
a number of potential benefits to protocol creation and availability. medical record. It is possible that non-pharmacologic interventions
Providers may be less comfortable with the dosing, safety in dif- (“verbal deescalation”) were performed without documentation.
ferent ages, and medication interactions of psychiatric medica- Because of the change in EMR between the prephase and postphase
tions than those used for other medical conditions, and pathways of the study, there was a change in the recording of behavioral team
can be used to avert potential errors. Additionally, not all providers activations from manual transcribing in a notebook to electronic re-
are aware of institutional resources, such as child life, to assist cording via the EMR. It is possible that there is a difference in com-
with lower levels of agitation. The PED staff member who initially pleteness of recording. Additionally, the numbers are small and
notes signs of early agitation may not be the primary physician. represent an urban population at a center, which receives a substan-
Having protocols in place may empower nursing attendants provid- tial number of police transports of patients placed on mental health
ing 1:1 supervision and other staff members to more easily recognize holds in the prehospital setting, often without presence of care-
early signs of agitation and either report to the primary provider or givers. In centers with greater family presence and more outpatient
offer non-pharmacologic deescalation. Finally, recommending the resources, strategies involving the family and outpatient mental
use of pediatric doses of medication and use of oral medications health providers may prove more effective than uniform application
early may not only minimize adverse events, but also decrease seda- of an agitation protocol. Alternatively, other centers may not have
tion time, allowing earlier evaluation by psychiatry and transfer to services, such as child life, and these recommendations would
definitive care. Although frequency of behavioral team activation require alteration for generalizability.
e172 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e173
e174 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
The final list of 14 core trauma-related skills included 11 skills consis- 26 [44%]; Level 2, 3 [5%]). Fellows at most programs (41, 69%)
tent with the ACGME requirements: arterial catheterization, central spent some or all of their trauma experience at an outside hospital.
venous catheterization, cricothyrotomy-translaryngeal intubation, Trauma resuscitation efforts at most programs (54, 92%) were led
endotracheal intubation, external cardiac pacing, intraosseous ac- by PEM: PEM alone (9, 15%) or PEM as part of a multidisciplinary
cess, tube thoracostomy, pericardiocentesis, nasal packing, the team (45, 76%). Surgery led trauma resuscitation alone at only 5
ability to perform a primary and/or secondary survey, and the abil- (8%) programs. In a minority of programs (17, 29%), PEM fellows
ity to serve as a team leader.4 Our panel added 3 supplemental led trauma resuscitations autonomously as independent attendings
skills to this list, including needle thoracostomy, crowd control/ without precepting. Of these, 1 program (6%) granted autonomy
family liaison, and FAST/eFAST (ie, Focused Assessment with to fellows in their first year, 4 (24%) in their second year, and 12
Sonography for Trauma/extended Focused Assessment with (71%) in their third year.
Sonography for Trauma) examination.
The survey was piloted with non-PD PEM faculty, PEM fel- Educational Design
lows, and EM faculty and was revised for clarity. The final survey Only 28 (47%) PEM fellowship programs used a formal
invited PDs to describe their program's (1) characteristics and trauma curriculum. Of these, 27 (96%) delivered this material in
clinical setting, and the degree of fellow independence, (2) educa- the first year of fellowship, 22 (79%) delivered this material in
tional and assessment techniques used to train fellows in trauma, the second year, and 20 (71%) delivered this material in the third
and (3) their expectation of graduating fellows' competency in year. Forty-two programs (71%) provided different trauma educa-
the 14 core trauma-related skills. The total number of questions tion materials to each year of fellowship. Specific instructional
varied according to the PDs response; the maximum number of methods used to teach and assess trauma management are pre-
questions was 34. Participants were allowed to write-in additional sented in Table 1. Surgeons contributed to PEM fellow trauma educa-
responses when a particular method or skill was not specifically tion in a majority of the programs (38, 64%). However, PDs reported
listed in the question. We anticipated the final survey would take that surgeons taught their fellows components of trauma training with
5 to 10 minutes to complete. variable frequency: weekly, 1 (3%); monthly, 9 (24%); quarterly,
9 (24%); biannually, 8 (21%); yearly, 5 (13%); other, 6 (16%).
Definitions Almost all programs required that their fellows certify in Pe-
We defined a formalized simulation center as one that contained diatric Advanced Life Support (PALS)12 (58, 98%) and Advanced
the presence of a mock trauma bay, separate control room, debriefing/ Trauma Life Support (ATLS)13 (58, 98%). Some programs (12,
conference room, and videotaping capabilities, or some portion
thereof.11 Multidisciplinary mock traumas were defined as those TABLE 1. Methods Used by PEM Fellowships to Train Their
practiced with other services (eg, surgery, nursing, orthopedics). Five Fellows in the Management of Pediatric Trauma
educational methods were considered as a means of fellow assess-
ment: debriefing, video recording of trauma or mock trauma resus- Training Methods n (%)
citations, checklists to evaluate trauma resuscitations, required
procedure logs, and clinical case logs. Predidactic self-assessment, Education
initially included on the survey as an educational method, was cat- ACLS 1 (2)
egorized as an additional assessment method for the purpose of Podcasts 6 (10)
the data analysis. Finally, PDs were classified as having high ex- Computer modules 11 (19)
pectations if they anticipated graduating fellows could perform Formal skills courses (other than PALS/ATLS) 12 (20)
12 (80%) or more of the core trauma skills independently. Trauma journal club 14 (24)
Asynchronous learning material 16 (27)
Statistical Analysis Academic writing by fellows 22 (37)
All statistical analyses were performed using STATA version Textbooks 25 (42)
14.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Tex). Continuous data were de- Small groups 27 (46)
scribed using medians (interquartile ranges [IQRs]), and categor-
Trauma grand rounds 27 (46)
ical data were described using frequencies (percentages).
Workshops 27 (46)
Cognitive theory training 30 (51)
RESULTS Formal education by surgeons 38 (64)
Multidisciplinary mock trauma 42 (71)
Program Characteristics, Clinical Setting, and Fellows teach trauma to nurses, residents, others 49 (83)
Fellow Independence Lectures 54 (92)
Fifty-nine PDs (70%) responded, each representing an indi- Simulation 57 (97)
vidual program. Four participants responded twice, and only the PALS 58 (98)
first response was analyzed. The median number of fellows per ATLS 58 (98)
program was 6 (IQR, 4–8; max, 18). One of the 59 programs Assessment
was planning to accept their first fellowship class at the time of sur- Predidactic self-assessment 3 (5)
vey and offered a response based on their anticipated program. The Checklists 16 (27)
median yearly pediatric emergency department census for respon- Videotaping real time and/or simulated trauma 17 (29)
dents was 54,000 (IQR, 33,000–70,000) with a median admission
Required procedures for competency 28 (47)
rate of 12% (IQR, 10%–17%). Fifty-seven (97%) programs ac-
cepted both pediatric and EM residency graduates, although Case logs 37 (63)
2 (3%) accepted only pediatric residency graduates. Formal debriefing after trauma 46 (78)
Most programs identified as pediatric trauma centers (Level 1, ACLS indicates advanced cardiac life support.
50 [85%]; Level 2, 5 [8%]), but not as adult trauma centers (Level 1,
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e175
e176 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
and clinical performance, not only in simulated patients but also in requesting specific data regarding the competency level of the pro-
actual patient scenarios.38,39 In a study of PEM simulation experi- gram's graduating fellows. Nevertheless, this surrogate measure is
ence, Cheng et al36 described their fellowship program's longitudi- in line with the ACGME's approach, which requires PD affirmation
nal simulation-based acute care curriculum. This program allowed of fellow competence based on the ACGME Milestones, rather than
PEM fellows to participate in simulation-based scenarios at least a standardized assessment to document competence.4,7
6 times per year.36 Although the optimal frequency for PEM fel-
low exposure to simulation-based training has not been estab-
lished, most programs that we surveyed train their fellows in a CONCLUSIONS
simulation center 1 to 4 times per year. Potential barriers to imple- This survey demonstrated great variability in the PEM fel-
menting a PEM simulation-based training program include a lack lowship trauma experience and that the opportunity for fellow au-
of financial support, simulator equipment, dedicated space, and tonomy in trauma resuscitation is uncommon. With infrequent
experienced simulation faculty.11 exposure to major trauma, alternative educational methods are es-
We found that lectures continue to be among the most com- sential. Although PALS, ATLS, simulation training, and lectures
monly used methods for teaching trauma to PEM fellows, with are used by more than 90% of PEM fellowships programs, over
92% of programs using this educational method. This finding is a dozen other methods are also used to varying degrees. Less than
interesting given the current trend in medical education toward ac- half of PEM programs have a formal curriculum to teach pediatric
tive learning formats and “flipped classrooms.”40 We also ob- trauma, and few PDs realistically expect fellows to achieve com-
served that, despite the increasing availability of online medical petency in all 14 core trauma-related skills. Our findings support
educational resources,41,42 less than a third of PEM fellowships re- the need for a validated, standardized educational approach to en-
ported incorporating asynchronous learning into their trauma ed- sure that PEM fellows learn, and attain competency in, pediatric
ucation program. Asynchronous learning is trainee-centered and trauma management.
uses online resources to enable the learner to acquire knowledge
without being limited to a particular time or place. This method
has been shown to be an effective means of adjusting educational REFERENCES
content delivery to the variable schedules of trainees.43 Asynchro-
1. Avraham JB, Bhandari M, Frangos SG, et al. Epidemiology of paediatric
nous trauma education may ensure that fellows are exposed to all
trauma presenting to US emergency departments: 2006–2012. Inj Prev.
the necessary nonprocedural educational content, even as external
2017. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042435.
rotators. The national coordination of Free Open Access Medical
education may assist PDs in developing an asynchronous PEM 2. Shaw KN, Schunk J, Ledwith C, et al. Pediatric Emergency Medicine
trauma curriculum that could standardize content across programs (PEM) fellowship: essentials of a three-year academic curriculum.
with different trauma exposure.44,45 Three-Year Academic Subcommittee of the PEM Fellowship Committee of
the Section of Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics.
We found that the resuscitation efforts of injured children, at
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1997;13:77–81.
the programs surveyed, are most often led by PEM as part of a
multidisciplinary team. Accordingly, most fellowship programs 3. Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) Fellowship Curriculum Statement.
report conducting mock trauma scenarios using a multidisciplin- Curriculum Subcommittee, Section of Emergency Medicine, American
ary team approach every few months. The logistical demands of Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993;9:60–66.
coordinating such events can prove to be difficult; however, these 4. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program
team-building exercises have been shown to improve confidence, Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Pediatric Emergency
clinical performance, and skill acquisition for pediatric, emer- Medicine. Editorial Revision: April 2014 p. 1–39.
gency, and surgical housestaff and faculty, as well as nurses, para- 5. Guilfoyle FJ, Milner R, Kissoon N. Resuscitation interventions in a tertiary
medics, and respiratory therapists.37,38,46,47 level pediatric emergency department: implications for maintenance of
With the wide variability in PEM fellow clinical exposure skills. CJEM. 2011;13:90–95.
and educational methods used by PDs, it is not surprising that 6. Mittiga MR, Geis GL, Kerrey BT, et al. The spectrum and frequency of
PD expectations also varied substantially. Only about half of critical procedures performed in a pediatric emergency department:
PDs have high expectations for their graduating trainees in trauma implications of a provider-level view. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61:263–270.
management, and few realistically expect their fellows to be able 7. Burns RA, Uspal NG. Procedural training and assessment for pediatric
to perform all of the 14 core trauma skills by completion of fellow- emergency medicine physicians within the United States and Canada: a
ship training. This finding demonstrates that the current state of survey study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017. doi: 10.1097/
PEM fellow training in trauma management is unlikely to result PEC.0000000000001362.
in competency for all trainees and that a standardized approach
8. Mittiga MR, Nagler J, Eldridge CD, et al. Essentials of pediatric emergency
is greatly needed.
medicine fellowship: part 3: clinical education and experience. Pediatr
Emerg Care. 2016;32:479–485.
Limitations 9. McAneney C. Pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs. Pediatr
Emerg Care. 2015;31:308–314.
Despite our efforts to create an exhaustive list of methods for
trauma training using a Delphi process and literature review, it is 10. FREIDA Online®, the AMA Residency & Fellowship Database®.
possible that some PDs are using didactic methods and assessment Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/life-career/search-ama-residency-
techniques that we did not specifically include on our survey. Nev- fellowship-database. Accessed June 1, 2016.
ertheless, PDs were able to use free-text boxes within the survey to 11. Eppich WJ, Nypaver MM, Mahajan P, et al. The role of high-fidelity
write in any methods that were not specifically listed. Also, al- simulation in training pediatric emergency medicine fellows in the
though the survey achieved a 70% response rate, it is possible that United States and Canada. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:1–7.
nonresponding programs use alternate approaches to teaching and 12. American Heart Association. Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS)
assessing fellow competency in pediatric trauma management. Fi- Course. Available at: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/CPRAndECC/
nally, our study asked for PD expectation of competency in HealthcareTraining/Pediatrics/Pediatric-%20Advanced-Life-Support-
trauma-related skills for graduating PEM fellows, rather than PALS_UCM_303705_Article.jsp#. Accessed January 31, 2018.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e177
13. American College of Surgeons. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) 30. Mohammad A, Branicki F, Abu-Zidan FM. Educational and clinical impact
Course. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/atls. of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses: a systematic review.
Accessed January 31, 2018. World J Surg. 2014;38:322–329.
14. Fuchs S, Yamamoto L, et al APLS: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine 31. Wolfram RW, Warren CM, Doyle CR, et al. Retention of Pediatric
Resource. 5th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning: Burlington, MA; 2012 Advanced Life Support (PALS) course concepts. J Emerg Med. 2003;25:
American Academy of Pediatrics. 475–479.
15. American College of Surgeons. Trauma Evaluation and Management 32. Ali J, Howard M, Williams JI. Do factors other than trauma volume
Course. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/atls/ affect attrition of ATLS-acquired skills? J Trauma. 2003;54:835–841.
team. Accessed December 15, 2017. 33. Mikrogianakis A, Osmond MH, Nuth JE, et al. Evaluation of a
16. Australian & New Zealand Burn Association. The Emergency multidisciplinary pediatric mock trauma code educational initiative:
Management of Severe Burns Course. Available at: https://anzba.org.au/ a pilot study. J Trauma. 2008;64:761–767.
education/emsb/. Accessed January 31, 2018. 34. Briggs A, Raja AS, Joyce MF, et al. The role of nontechnical skills in
17. American Heart Association. Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support simulated trauma resuscitation. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:732–739.
(ACLS) Course. Available at: http://cpr.heart.org/AHAECC/CPRAndECC/ 35. Parsons SE, Carter EA, Waterhouse LJ, et al. Improving ATLS performance
Training/HealthcareProfessional/ in simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation using a checklist. Ann Surg.
AdvancedCardiovascularLifeSupportACLS/UCM_473186_ 2014;259:807–813.
Advanced-Cardiovascular-Life-Support-ACLS.jsp. Accessed 36. Cheng A, Goldman RD, Aish MA, et al. A simulation-based acute care
January 31, 2018. curriculum for pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training programs.
18. American College of Surgeons. Rural Trauma Team Development Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010;26:475–480.
Course. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/ 37. Falcone RA Jr, Daugherty M, Schweer L, et al. Multidisciplinary
education/rttdc. Accessed January 31, 2018. pediatric trauma team training using high-fidelity trauma simulation.
19. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Trauma J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:1065–1071.
Resuscitation in Kids (TRIK) Course. Available at: http://www. 38. Steinemann S, Berg B, Skinner A, et al. In situ, multidisciplinary,
royalcollege.ca/rcsite/ppi/courses/trauma-resuscitation-in-kids-trik-e. simulation-based teamwork training improves early trauma care.
Accessed December 15, 2017. J Surg Educ. 2011;68:472–477.
20. Reed T, Horsley TL, Muccino K, et al. Simulation using TeamSTEPPS 39. Rosenthal ME, Adachi M, Ribaudo V, et al. Achieving housestaff
to promote interprofessional education and collaborative practice. competence in emergency airway management using scenario based
Nurse Educ. 2017;42:E1–E5. simulation training: comparison of attending vs housestaff trainers.
21. Ting WH, Peng FS, Lin HH, et al. The impact of Chest. 2006;129:1453–1458.
situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) on safety 40. Persky AM, McLaughlin JE. The flipped classroom — from theory to
attitudes in the obstetrics department. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. practice in health professional education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81:118.
2017;56:171–174. 41. AAMC. Effective use of educational technology in medical education.
22. Lee Chang A, Dym AA, Venegas-Borsellino C, et al. Comparison 2007; Available at: https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/effective%
between simulation-based training and lecture-based education in 20use%20of%20educational.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2017.
teaching situation awareness. A randomized controlled study. Ann Am 42. ECAR. Leveraging Technology to Better Engage Students. 2016;
Thorac Soc. 2017;14:529–535. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/8/educause-research-
23. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies snapshot-leveraging-technology-to-better-engage-students. Accessed
to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78:775–780. December 15, 2017.
24. Croskerry P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive 43. Chang TP, Pham PK, Sobolewski B, et al. Pediatric emergency medicine
strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1184–1204. asynchronous e-learning: a multicenter randomized controlled Solomon
four-group study. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:912–919.
25. American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma. ATLS Student
Course Manual: Advanced Trauma Life Support. American College of 44. Baker M, Long N, Parker C. The world of FOAM: a practical guide to
Surgeons; 2013. free online paediatric education resources. J Paediatr Child Health. 2016;
52:105–108.
26. Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017;66:
45. Nickson CP, Cadogan MD. Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM)
1–76.
for the emergency physician. Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26:76–83.
27. Valani RA, Yanchar N, Grant V, et al. The development of a national
46. Toback SL, Fiedor M, Kilpela B, et al. Impact of a pediatric primary care
pediatric trauma curriculum. Med Teach. 2010;32:e115–e119.
office-based mock code program on physician and staff confidence to
28. George BC, Dunnington GL, DaRosa DA, et al. Trainee autonomy and perform life-saving skills. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22:415–422.
patient safety. Ann Surg. 2017;267:820–822.
47. Allan CK, Thiagarajan RR, Beke D, et al. Simulation-based training
29. Naveh E, Katz-Navon T, Stern Z. Resident physicians' clinical training and delivered directly to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit engenders
error rate: the roles of autonomy, consultation, and familiarity with the preparedness, comfort, and decreased anxiety among multidisciplinary
literature. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015;20:59–71. resuscitation teams. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:646–652.
e178 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com e179
determine the extent to which children (with Medicaid or private range of care coordination in this study among children and youth
insurance) receive care coordination related to their behavioral by age group. Comorbidity status was defined by 2 types of co-
health conditions when they present in the ED. A limitation of this morbidity variables, other behavioral health comorbidity, and
approach is that we are unable to know for sure whether care co- physical health comorbidity. Other behavioral health comorbidity
ordination was deliberate because insurance claims codes for this was separated into 2 variables, mental health comorbidity and sub-
activity are infrequently used; however, this strategy provides re- stance use comorbidity, with each variable defined as 1 if an addi-
searchers with a good proxy for this activity, and defining care co- tional mental health and/or substance use diagnosis was present,
ordination in this way for other health conditions has been taking into account the diagnosis used to identify the behavioral
supported by the NQF.14 The study then identified key factors as- health ED visit. For physical health comorbidity, we used the
sociated with that care coordination. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Single-Level Clinical
Classifications Software (CCS) (see Supplemental Material 3,
METHODS http://links.lww.com/PEC/A285 for CCS categories).17 Individ-
uals with any listed diagnosis from the ED visit record that met
Data Source, Subject Selection, and Study Period these physical health comorbidity CCS classifications were posi-
Using the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Multi-State tively coded for a condition.
Medicaid Database and the Commercial Claims and Encounters There were 2 possible Medicaid insurance plan types, com-
Database, we extracted claims for all outpatient services and en- prehensive and HMO, with large enough numbers to permit anal-
rollment information for children and adolescents aged 2 to ysis. In the Medicaid data, we excluded high-deductible health
18 years with continuous enrollment during calendar year plans (HDHPs) and consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs) be-
2014.15 The Commercial database is proprietary and includes cause of low frequencies of enrollees. For the same reason, in the
deidentified insurance claims from employees and dependents, commercial data, we excluded capitated or partially capitated
which are provided by large, self-insured employers and re- point-of-service (POS) plans. For private insurance, in addition
gional health plans who participate in the database. The Medic- to comprehensive and HMO, other possible plan types were HDHPs,
aid database is also proprietary, and it includes deidentified CDHPs, exclusive provider organizations (EPOs), noncapitated
claims from beneficiaries in 11 Medicaid states. We created sep- POS plans, and PPOs. We combined the HDHPs and CDHPs
arate Medicaid and private insurance data sets for analysis pur- for private insurance into an HDHP category and combined
poses. In 2014, the Commercial database contained claims EPO, PPO, and POS into “other managed care.”
records for more than 47 million individuals from approximately Additional individual characteristics were available for
350 payers, and the Medicaid database contained claims records MarketScan Commercial data only, including region (Northeast,
for more than 11 million individuals.15 North Central, South, West, and other) and primary beneficiary
employee status (active, disabled, retired, other). Region was
Outcome Measure: Follow-up Care After an categorized as “other” when the variable was missing. The pri-
mary beneficiary of the insurance coverage was defined as “ac-
ED Visit With a Behavioral Health Diagnosis
tive” if the beneficiary was currently employed, “disabled” if
We used an NQF-endorsed care coordination measure ap- the beneficiary was on disability, “retired” if the beneficiary
plied to health insurance claims as a framework for our assessment was retired but still receiving benefits, and “other” if employee
of care coordination following a mental health– or substance use– status was missing.
related ED visit.13 Children and adolescents were selected if they
had an ED encounter during the 11-month period from January 1, Analytic Approach
2014 through November 30, 2014, with any listed behavioral
health diagnosis (see Supplemental Material 1, http://links.lww. In order to evaluate the frequency distributions of enrollees'
com/PEC/A278 for complete list of International Classification demographic, insurance, and health-related characteristics by care
of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes). The coordination status, we calculated descriptive statistics. χ2 tests
measure uses primary diagnosis (ie, first-listed) to identify behav- were used to assess the statistical significance of associations with
ioral health ED visits, but we selected any listed diagnosis, follow- the measure of care coordination. When we found significant
ing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality approach, to differences in the overall χ2 tests (P < 0.05), we then tested each
be more inclusive given that there is no primary diagnosis field for subgroup for significance relative to all other subgroups. These
ED visits.16 We examined follow-up care from the first identified additional tests permitted us to determine which subgroup(s) in-
behavioral health ED visit during the period and used the dis- fluenced the overall group significance.
charge date of the ED visit as the anchor date for the episode of We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to
care. The binary care coordination measure then was defined as identify the factors associated with the binary outcome variable,
1 if the patient had a follow-up visit with either a primary care receipt of care coordination. Because we utilized 2 different insur-
or a specialty mental health provider (see Supplemental Material ance type–specific data sets for the analysis, logistic regression
2, http://links.lww.com/PEC/A284, for provider type codes) in models were performed separately for enrollees with Medicaid in-
the 7 days after the ED visit discharge.13 Emergency department surance and those who were privately insured. All independent
visits that resulted in an inpatient admission were excluded from variables were categorical in nature, and a reference category was
this study. omitted for each independent variable.
e180 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
TABLE 1. Percentage of Behavioral Health–Related ED Visits That Resulted in a Follow-up Visit With a Health Provider in 7 Days After
Discharge, by Sociodemographic Characteristics and Payer Type, Column Percentages
Children and Adolescents Covered by Medicaid aged 2 to 5 years had a markedly lower than average care
There were 29,102 children and adolescents with Medicaid coordination (29.9%).
coverage who had a behavioral health–related ED visit. From re-
ported column percentages, the largest age category of enrollees
was 10 to 14 years (45.4%). A higher proportion of enrollees were Children and Adolescents Covered by
female (52.9%), and comorbid physical health conditions were Private Insurance
most common (32.4%). From reported row percentages, fewer There were 24,066 children and adolescents with private
than half of Medicaid patients (45.8%) had a follow-up visit with health insurance coverage who had a behavioral health ED visit.
a primary or specialty care provider within 1 week (7 days) fol- The largest age group was children aged 15 to 18 years (61.0%).
lowing the ED visit. Children aged 10 to 14 years had slightly There were more females (55.7%) than males. From reported
higher than average care coordination (48.4%), and children row percentages, fewer than half (46.6%) had a follow-up visit
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e181
with a primary or specialty care provider within 1 week (7 days) Medicaid and private insurance results were similar for co-
following the ED visit. Similar to Medicaid descriptive results, morbidity variables. Children with a mental health comorbidity
children aged 2 to 5 years had much lower than average care co- had 1.77 higher odds (Medicaid) and 1.59 higher odds (private
ordination (26.2%), whereas adolescents aged 10 to 14 years had insurance) of care coordination than children without a mental
higher than average care coordination (52.6%). health comorbidity. Similarly, children with a physical health
comorbidity had 1.25 higher odds (Medicaid) and 1.22 higher
odds (private insurance) than children without a physical health
Multivariate Regression Analyses comorbidity. Having a substance use comorbidity was not sta-
Multivariate regression results for the factors associated with tistically significant for children covered by Medicaid (AOR,
the ED care coordination measure are presented in Table 2. Re- 0.92; CI, 0.83–1.02) but was associated with lower odds of care
gression results, which control for multiple patient and payer char- coordination for children with private insurance (AOR, 0.77;
acteristics, are consistent with descriptive findings. CI, 0.60–0.87).
Under both Medicaid and private insurance, children aged 10 Children with comprehensive coverage under Medicaid had
to 14 years had higher odds of receiving care coordination than the decreased odds of care coordination (AOR, 0.79; CI, 0.75–0.84).
reference group (adolescents aged 15–18 years). Children aged 2 Under private insurance, odds of care coordination were not
to 5 years had lower odds of care coordination (Medicaid adjusted different for children covered by comprehensive coverage (ref-
odds ratio [AOR], 0.61; confidence interval [CI], 0.53–0.70; erence = HMO), whereas children with HDHP (AOR, 1.14; CI,
private AOR, 0.45; CI, 0.33–0.60). For Medicaid and private 1.04–1.27) and other managed care plan (AOR, 1.18; CI, 1.09–
insurance, males have slightly lower odds of care coordination 1.27) types had increased odds of care coordination.
(Medicaid AOR, 0.93; CI, 0.89–0.98; private AOR, 0.82; CI, For the region variable that was available only in the private
0.77–0.86) than females. insurance data, the results do suggest an association between
TABLE 2. Adjusted Odds of Post–Emergency Room Visit Care Coordination Among Children With Behavioral Health Conditions, by
Payer Type
e182 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
region and care coordination. All region odds ratios for North young children, in which case care coordination may not be neces-
Central, South, West, and other (ie, missing) were statistically sig- sary. Although the number of young children aged 2 to 5 years was
nificant (greater than 1), indicating children in those regions have small relative to the other age groups, it is of concern that some
increased odds of care coordination compared with the reference care coordination following psychiatric-related ED visits may be
category, Northeast. left undone or not completed in a timely manner. Although we
did not have data on behavioral health providers who are trained
and certified in the provision of care to young children, this study
DISCUSSION finding raises the issue of the shortage of these clinicians.29–31
This study was a preliminary step toward measuring Even though an ED physician may make a referral that the care-
ED-related behavioral health care coordination. Its purposes were givers of a young child seek behavioral health care, there may be
to adapt an existing care coordination measure for ED visits con- no provider nearby who could provide such care. As a result, it
nected with behavioral health and to evaluate the degree to which may not be possible for care coordination to be completed for this
care coordination may be occurring. Study findings suggest that age group because of workforce shortages. Efforts to address this
fewer than half of children and youth with behavioral health– gap would mean that problems could be identified and interven-
related ED visits may be receiving care coordination as defined tions could be implemented when children are younger, possibly
by a follow-up visit with a primary or specialty care provider preventing symptoms from worsening or mitigating their effects
within 7 days. There are several possible explanations that may so that behavioral health outcomes improve and ED utilization
clarify this outcome including the following: (1) the ED physician is minimized.
made a referral for follow-up care, but the caregiver did not com- This study found lower odds of care coordination for male
plete the referral; (2) the caregiver tried to complete the referral children compared with females, and this finding is consistent
but was unable to schedule an appointment within 7 days or was with studies of follow-up care for adults that have also resulted
unable to schedule a visit at all with a provider; (3) the presenting in similar findings for male patients.32 Regardless of age, lower
problem was deemed to be resolved during the ED visit, and no odds of care coordination for male children and youth compared
care coordination was thought to be needed; or (4) the ED phy- with females following a behavioral health–related ED visit may
sician did not make a referral. A potential solution to the first 2 be associated with societal expectations regarding emotional be-
possibilities is ED-based care coordination provided by a medi- havior connected with sex.33 Behavioral health problems in fe-
cal social worker or other professional, such as a nurse case males may be more widely recognized than in males because
manager.18–20 However, many EDs lack these resources. Con- Western society associates emotions with the feminine, and so
nected with this matter is wait times, especially for specialty care emotional disorders may be deemed a higher priority when some
behavioral health providers such as psychiatrists, which can be caregivers or clinicians observe these conditions in females com-
as long as 50 days in some states.21 Finally, related to the third pared with males.34 As a result, some behavioral health problems
possibility, the ED can be a source of emergent behavioral health in males may be deemphasized or overlooked. Consequently,
care for some families when they cannot access care in the com- completing referrals for this group may not be considered a prior-
munity in either primary or specialty care settings when they ity and so care coordination may happen at lower rates for males
need it.22–25 For example, consider the anecdotal case of a care- than for females.
giver who took his/her child to the ED for care because the child Because many providers have not been able to bill for care
was sent home from school for attention-deficit/hyperactivity coordination and the cases when they could were limited, clini-
disorder–related behaviors and was advised that the child would cians rarely submit reimbursement requests to insurance compa-
not be permitted to return to class until his/her behavior avoided nies for this activity.35 In place of using an analysis strategy
disrupting the class. These terms may have led the caregiver to go based on a specific care coordination billing code, the approach
to the ED in order to seek a prescription for stimulants for his/her for this study was to use inference. However, some observers
child that had perhaps lapsed or expired, possibly because he/she may deem this design to be a limitation of this study. Future re-
had no regular relationship with a primary care provider. search that is conducted after 2017 might take a billing code–
Children aged 10 to 14 years had increased odds of receiving focused approach with insurance claims data once providers begin
care coordination compared with older youth, suggesting that billing for care coordination using a new rule for Medicare that
school-related concerns connected with the child's age may be would reimburse providers for certain behavioral health services
a factor in the receipt of care. Some teachers may require that a when they are provided within a collaborative care model.36 Per-
child's behavioral health problem be adequately addressed with a haps other payers will follow Medicare's lead in this area. Another
psychopharmacological or psychosocial intervention before he/ limitation may be that the rate of care coordination that we found
she returns to the classroom. Children aged 10 to 14 years may in this study was an underestimate, given the possibility that the
be more compliant with treatment than older teenagers, and this behavioral health care some youth received after follow-up from
characteristic may explain why this group had increased odds of a specialty provider was paid for out of pocket.
care coordination. Other studies have found a temporal effect of
the school year related to trends in behavioral health–related ED
visits among children.26,27 Although our data did not directly ex-
amine this factor, care coordination may be more likely to occur in CONCLUSIONS
order to facilitate a child's immediate return to school following an Care coordination by primary care and/or specialty care pro-
ED visit. viders following a behavioral health–related ED visit by children
However, this factor may be less of a concern for younger and youth is important because few EDs are equipped to fully
children (aged 2–5 years old) because they spend less time in handle these matters beyond addressing the presenting problem
school (or may not be in school at all) compared with older chil- without assistance from behavioral health clinicians, and EDs
dren, and young children's behavioral health conditions may be are not intended to provide behavioral health care on an ongoing
different than those of adolescents who may experience more sui- basis.32,37 Emergency departments are an important component
cidal ideation or substance use.28 Emergency department physi- of medical neighborhoods that comprise primary and specialty
cians may be more likely to suggest watchful waiting for certain care providers. Medical neighborhoods with adequate behavioral
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e183
health resources are essential to ensuring that children and youth 19. Moore M, Whiteside LK, Dotolo D, et al. The role of social work in
are able to achieve the best behavioral health outcomes possible.38 providing mental health services and care coordination in an urban trauma
center emergency department. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67:1348–1354.
REFERENCES 20. Uspal NG, Rutman LE, Kodish I, et al. Use of a dedicated, non-
1. Perou R, Bitsko RH, Blumberg SJ, et al. Mental health surveillance among physician–led mental health team to reduce pediatric emergency
children—United States, 2005-2011. MMWR Suppl. 2013;62(suppl 2):1–35. department lengths of stay. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:440–447.
2. Pittsenbarger ZE, Mannix R. Trends in pediatric visits to the emergency 21. Steinman KJ, Shoben AB, Dembe AE, et al. How long do adolescents wait
department for psychiatric illnesses. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:25–30. for psychiatry appointments?. Community Ment Health J. 2015;51:
782–789.
3. Dolan MA, Mace SE. American Academy of Pediatrics; American College
of Emergency Physicians. Pediatric mental health emergencies in the 22. Lynch S, Bautista M, Freer C, et al. Toward effective utilization of the
emergency medical services system. American College of Emergency pediatric emergency department: the case of ADHD. Soc Work Public
Physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:484–486. Health. 2015;31:1–10.
4. Olfson M, Druss BG, Marcus SC. Trends in mental health care among 23. Sturm JJ, Hirsh D, Weselman B, et al. Reconnecting patients with their
children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2029–2038. primary care provider: an intervention for reducing nonurgent pediatric
emergency department visits. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014;53:988–994.
5. Reder S, Quan L. Emergency mental health care for youth in Washington
State: qualitative research addressing hospital emergency departments' 24. Neighmond P. Can't get in to see your doctor? Many patients turn to urgent
identification and referral of youth facing mental health issues. Pediatr care. NPR: Morning Edition. 2016. Available at: http://www.npr.org.
Emerg Care. 2004;20:742–748. Accessed April 18, 2018.
6. Frosch E, dosReis S, Maloney K. Connections to outpatient mental health 25. Enard KR, Ganelin DM. Reducing preventable emergency department
care of youths with repeat emergency department visits for psychiatric utilization and costs by using community health workers as patient
crises. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:646–649. navigators. J Healthc Manag. 2013;58:412–427; discussion 428.
7. Dolan MA, Fein JA. Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine. 26. Ali S, Rosychuk RJ, Dong KA, et al. Temporal trends in pediatric mental
Pediatric and adolescent mental health emergencies in the emergency health visits: using longitudinal data to inform emergency department
medical services system. Pediatrics. 2011;127:e1356–e1366. health care planning. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28:620–625.
8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Quality 27. Soto EC, Frederickson AM, Trivedi H, et al. Frequency and correlates of
and Disparities Report: Chartbook on Care Coordination. Rockville, MD: inappropriate pediatric psychiatric emergency room visits. J Clin
US Department of Health & Human Services; 2016. Psychiatry. 2009;70:1164–1177.
9. Jee SH, Antonucci TC, Aida M, et al. Emergency department utilization by 28. Ali MM, Teich J, Lynch S, et al. Utilization of mental health services by
children in foster care. Ambul Pediatr. 2005;5:102–106. preschool-aged children with private insurance coverage [published
10. McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, et al Closing the Quality Gap: online ahead of print February 23, 2018]. Adm Policy Ment
A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Rockville, MD: Health. 2018.
Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality; 2007. 29. Bishop TF, Seirup JK, Pincus HA, et al. Population of US practicing
11. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Quality psychiatrists declined, 2003–13, which may help explain poor
and Disparities Report: Chartbook on Care Coordination: Care access to mental health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35:
Coordination. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and 1271–1277.
Quality; 2015. 30. Schaaf SV. There's a shortage of child psychiatrists, and kids are
12. National Quality Forum. Strengthening the Core Set of Healthcare Quality hurting. The Washington Post. 2016:E1.
Measures for Children Enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP, 2015. Washington, 31. Health Resources & Services Administration. The U.S. Health Workforce
DC: National Quality Forum; 2015. Chartbook: Part IV: Behavioral and Allied Health. Rockville, MD: US
13. National Quality Forum. NQF-endorsed measures (QPS): follow-up after Department of Health & Human Services; 2013.
discharge from the emergency department for mental health or alcohol or 32. Zun L. Care of psychiatric patients: the challenge to emergency physicians.
other drug dependence (#2605). Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/ West J Emerg Med. 2016;17:173–176.
Measures_Reports_Tools.aspx. Accessed September 23, 2015.
33. Witt C. Feminist history of philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of
14. National Quality Forum. Preferred Practices and Performance Measures
Philosophy. 2012. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-
for Measuring and Reporting Care Coordination: A Consensus Report.
femhist/. Accessed July 29, 2013.
Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2010.
34. Stein HF, Stein MA. American Medicine as Culture. Boulder, CO:
15. Hansen L. The Truven Marketscan Databases for Life Sciences
Westview Press; 1990.
Researchers. Truven Health Analytics: Bethesda, MD; 2017.
35. O'Malley AS, Tynan A, Cohen GR, et al Coordination of Care by Primary
16. Weiss AJ, Barrett ML, Heslin KC, et al Trends in Emergency Department
Care Practices: Strategies, Lessons and Implications. Washington,
Visits Involving Mental and Substance Use Disorders, 2006–2013. HCUP
DC: Center for Studying Health System Change, Mathematica Policy
Statistical Brief #216. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research &
Research; 2009.
Quality; 2016.
36. Canady VA. CMS proposal to change payment rates promotes coordinated
17. Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality. HCUP Clinical Classifications
care. Ment Health Wkly. 2016;26:1–3.
Software (CCS) for ICD-9-CM. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
(HCUP). 2006–2009. 2016. Available at: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/ 37. Stone A, Rogers D, Kruckenberg S, et al. Impact of the mental healthcare
toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Accessed July 1, 2016. delivery system on California emergency departments. West J Emerg Med.
18. Barrueto F, Schlicher N, Wiler J. A path to the right care in the right setting: 2012;13:51–56.
innovations and interventions. Paper presented at Brookings Institution 38. Taylor EF, Lake T, Nysenbaum J, et al Coordinating Care in the Medical
Symposium: Reimagining Emergency Medicine: How to Integrate Care for Neighborhood: Critical Components and Available Mechanisms. Agency
the Acutely Ill and Injured. Washington, DC; 2015. for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD; 2011.
e184 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
with an elevated heart rate (HR).2 Such policies may prompt ther-
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify emergency department apy to reduce HR, such as fluid boluses or antipyretics, and may
(ED) heart rate (HR) values that identify children at elevated risk of ED re- delay or prevent discharge.
visit with admission. The clinical utility of discharge HR-based reevaluation strat-
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients 0 to egies has not been demonstrated. If these strategies are effective at
18 years old discharged from a tertiary-care pediatric ED from January identifying children in need of additional care, they should be
2013 to December 2014. We created percentile curves for the last recorded more widely implemented. However, even interventions with
HR for age using data from calendar year 2013 and used receiver operating strong face validity may be ineffective. Implementation of ineffec-
characteristic (ROC) curves to characterize the performance of the percen- tive strategies may reduce time and resources available for more
tiles for predicting ED revisit with admission within 72 hours. In a held-out high-yield activities or may lead to unintended negative conse-
validation data set (calendar year 2014 data), we evaluated test characteris- quences. The choice of HR cut points may impact the effective-
tics of last-recorded HR-for-age cut points identified as promising on the ness of discharge HR–based interventions. In practice, most HR
ROC curves, as well as those identifying the highest 5% and 1% of last re- cut points for children are based on expert opinion and are not em-
corded HRs for age. pirically derived.3–8 One recent publication identified an associa-
Results: We evaluated 183,433 eligible ED visits. Last recorded HR for tion between a prespecified measure of elevated HR for age
age had poor discrimination for predicting revisit with admission (area un- (>99th percentile for healthy outpatients) and a small increased risk
der the curve, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.63). No promising cut of revisit (risk ratio, 1.3) but no increased risk in a composite out-
points were identified on the ROC curves. Cut points identifying the come of revisit with clinically important intervention or admission.9
highest 5% and 1% of last recorded HRs for age showed low sensitivity We sought to empirically identify cut points for discharge
(10.1% and 2.5%) with numbers needed to evaluate of 62 and 50, respec- HR that would identify children at high risk of revisit with admis-
tively, to potentially prevent 1 revisit with admission. sion after ED discharge using a large electronic health record data
Conclusions: Last recorded ED HR discriminates poorly between chil- set. We also aimed to identify alternate measures of HR that may
dren who are and are not at risk of revisit with admission in a pediatric be more effective and subsets of patients for whom evaluation of
ED. The use of single-parameter HR in isolation as an automated trigger for discharge HR may be particularly useful.
mandatory reevaluation prior to discharge may not improve revisit outcomes.
Key Words: discharge, quality improvement, readmissions, vital signs
(Pediatr Emer Care 2021;37: e185–e191)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com e185
recorded HR, medications given during the visit, and ED disposi- and alternate outcomes. For each sensitivity analysis, only the pa-
tion were also extracted. rameter(s) indicated were changed; otherwise, the inclusion criteria
(all discharged visits in 2014), HR cut point (last-recorded HR-for-
Outcome age percentiles), and outcome (revisit with admission within
Our primary outcome was the proportion of index ED visits 72 hours) of the primary analysis were used. The sensitivity anal-
followed by an ED revisit with admission within 72 hours. Revisit yses are detailed below:
with admission was chosen as the primary outcome because it was
considered more likely to identify children with serious unrecognized Additional HR Types and Temperature-Adjusted HR
illness at the initial visit. Alternate outcomes were evaluated, includ- We created percentiles for triage for age and maximum HR
ing any revisit, as described further in the Sensitivity Analyses. for age (the maximum HR observed during the ED visit) using
2013 data. We also created and evaluated HR-for-age percentiles
Analysis Overview adjusted for body temperature for last HR and triage HR by
Our primary analysis was performed in 3 steps. First, we de- subtracting 10 beats/min for each degree Celsius above 37°C and
veloped percentile curves for last recorded HR for age, which adding 10 beats/min for each degree Celsius below 37°C.12–14
would allow us to evaluate the relationship between vital signs When a simultaneously recorded temperature was not available,
and outcomes across ages. Second, we used data from 2013 to cre- we used the HR without adjustment. For each set of percentiles,
ate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to identify can- we evaluated discrimination with ROC curves and determined
didate cut points for last recorded HR using an outcome of ED the cut points that identify the highest 5% and 1% of HRs for age.
revisit with admission within 72 hours. Finally, we used data from
2014 to evaluate the performance of candidate HR-for-age cut Restricted Inclusion Criteria
points. Details of these steps are presented below. Last recorded HR may be related to outcomes differently in
visits with certain characteristics, either because of true physio-
Percentile Creation logic differences or altered clinician behavior related to HR.
We used HR data from visits in 2013 ending in discharge, ad- Therefore, we evaluated the test characteristics of candidate last-
mission, or observation to create the percentiles. A random subset recorded HR-for-age cut points in 3 restricted groups. First, we re-
(40%) of the data was used to generate the curves, and the remain- stricted the sample to visits in which albuterol had not been given,
ing 60% was used to evaluate the fit of the percentiles overall and because of the effect of β-agonist medications on HR. Second, we
within 5 age groups: younger than 1 year, 1 to younger than restricted the sample to visits in which 1 or more boluses of intra-
3 years, 3 to younger than 6 years, 6 to younger than 12 years, venous fluid had been given, because HR is often a factor consid-
and 12 years or older. We initially used the GAMLSS package ered when determining the need for an intravenous bolus and
in R software to create a last-recorded HR-for-age percentile refer- assessing the adequacy of the response to a bolus. We used logistic
ence that would allow conversion of HRs to z scores.10 However, regression to compare the risk of revisit for visits with and without
the distribution of last recorded HRs differed from a normal distri- albuterol administration and with and without bolus administration.
bution in a manner that could not be modeled well using the Finally, we restricted the sample to visits in which the last HR was
GAMLSS framework, and the fit of the upper centiles in the val- recorded 30 minutes or less before discharge, as these HRs are
idation data set was poor. Therefore, we created a last-recorded more likely to be representative of the HR at the time of discharge.
HR-for-age percentile reference using quantile regression with cu-
bic splines, a method that does not require any assumptions about Varied Outcomes
the underlying distribution of data.11 We created multiple upper We evaluated the predictive value and test characteristics of
centile curves (12 levels ≥90th percentile) to allow identification selected cut points above for the following alternate outcomes:
of the level best associated with the outcomes of interest. any ED revisit, ED revisit with intensive care unit (ICU) admis-
sion, and ED revisit with admission within 1 or 7 days.
Cut Point Identification
For the primary analysis presented here, we generated ROC Resolution of Tachycardia
curves examining the relationship between last-recorded-HR per- We identified visits in which any HR, starting at triage, was
centile and our primary outcome in discharged patients in 2013. above the highest 5% cut point for last recorded HR for age.
We considered 5% and 1% to be the upper and lower bounds of Among those visits, we considered visits in which the last re-
the proportion of ED visits for which it may be feasible to delay corded HR was less than this cut point to have resolved tachycar-
discharge in order to perform some degree of further observation, dia and used logistic regression to evaluate whether resolved
evaluation, or treatment, ranging from a single set of repeat vital tachycardia was associated with a change in risk of ED revisit,
signs to admission. Therefore, we chose to examine cut points with or without admission, within 72 hours.
for the highest 5% and 1% of discharge HR among discharged pa- Statistical analyses were done using Stata 14.2 (StataCorp,
tients using 2014 data, in addition to any promising cut points College Station, Tex). The study was designated not human sub-
identified from the ROC curves. jects research by the institutional review board at Penn State College
of Medicine and met criteria for not human subjects research set by
Performance of Candidate Cut Points the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia institutional review board.
We calculated standard test characteristics for candidate HR
percentile cut points.
RESULTS
Sensitivity Analyses There were 183,433 visits by 104,159 patients in 2013 and
The primary analysis included all index visits. After the pri- 2014 (Fig. 1). Visit data from 2013 and 2014 showed generally
mary analysis, we performed sensitivity analyses using 2014 data similar demographic and visit characteristics, including a similar
to evaluate alternate HR measures, restricted inclusion criteria, prevalence of ED revisits with admission (0.8%; Table 1). The
e186 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
proportion of visits with an HR within 30 minutes of discharge 50 and 62 children with high last recorded HRs would need to
was higher in 2014 than in 2013 (P < 0.001). be evaluated to potentially prevent 1 revisit with admission.
The median number of HRs recorded for discharged visits
was 2 (interquartile range, 1, 3), with 33% of discharged visits
having only 1 recorded HR.
Sensitivity Analyses
HR-for-Age Percentiles Maximum HR had a higher AUC than last recorded HR (0.66;
95% CI, 0.64–0.68). The AUC for triage HR (0.63; 95% CI,
The last-recorded HR-for-age percentiles (Supplemental File
0.61–0.66) and the sensitivity, PPV, and positive likelihood ratios
1, http://links.lww.com/PEC/A283) demonstrated good fit in the
all had overlapping CIs with those for last recorded HR (Table 3).
validation subset. Among 5 age groups, the proportions of HRs
No other modifications, including using temperature-
above the 95th percentile ranged from 4.8% to 5.5%, and the pro-
adjusted HR, restricting the type of analyzed visits, and using al-
portions above the 99th percentile ranged from 0.7% to 1.4%.
ternate outcomes, resulted in improved test characteristics. The
risk of revisit with admission was higher for visits in which albu-
Primary Analysis terol was given (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.7–2.7) compared
The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting revisit with with when it was not given and higher for visits in which intrave-
admission using last recorded HR was 0.61 (95% confidence in- nous boluses were given (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7–3.2) compared
terval [CI], 0.58–0.63) (Fig. 2). Because no promising cut points with visits in which no bolus was given. Test characteristics in
were identified on the ROC curves, only cut points for the highest these restricted visit groups were not improved compared with
5% and 1% of HR for age were evaluated further. These cut points the primary analysis including all index visits (Table 3).
corresponded to the 91st and 97th percentiles of last recorded HR Visits in which tachycardia resolved were more likely to end
among all ED patients, because higher last recorded HRs were in discharge (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.3–2.6) compared with visits in
more prevalent among visits ending in admission. These cut which tachycardia was present and was not resolved at the last re-
points had low sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV), corded HR. Among visits that ended in discharge, resolution of
with likelihood ratios (positive) of 2.0 and 2.4, respectively, and tachycardia was not associated with a significant change in risk
likelihood ratios (negative) of 0.95 and 0.99 (Table 2). Between of revisit with admission (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.97–1.9) and was
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e187
2013 2014
n % n %
Total included visits 81,350 82,823
Distinct patients 61,949 59,367
Age
0 to <1 y 13,058 16% 12,958 16%
1 to <4 y 24,882 31% 24,954 30%
4 to <12 y 28,437 35% 29,345 35%
12 to <18 y 14,973 18% 15,566 19%
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native 51 0.06% 57 0.07%
Asian 2523 3% 2466 3%
Black or African American 50,308 62% 50,630 61%
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 70 0.09% 86 0.1%
White 19,511 24% 20,088 24%
Multiple races 1225 2% 1367 2%
Other 7629 9% 8083 10%
Unknown 33 0.04% 46 0.06%
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 6118 8% 6337 8%
Not Hispanic or Latino 75,191 92% 76,409 92%
Unknown 41 0.05% 77 0.09%
Chief complaint*
Fever 13,501 17% 13,091 16%
Respiratory distress 16,315 20% 17,238 21%
Trauma 13,251 16% 13,395 16%
Discharged visits 66,081 81% 67,659 82%
Distinct patients for discharged visits 49,366 50,533
Of discharged visits
Any revisit (3 d) 1821 2.8% 1873 2.8%
Revisit with admission (3 d) 557 0.8% 552 0.8%
Revisit with ICU admission (3 d) 32 0.05% 22 0.03%
Revisit with admission (1 d) 166 0.3% 180 0.3%
Revisit with admission (7 d) 860 1.4% 833 1.3%
Received albuterol 6025 9% 6371 9%
Received ≥1 boluses 2317 4% 2127 3%
Last HR ≤30 min before discharge 12,278 19% 17,394 26%
*Most common chief complaints presented; visits may have more than one chief complaint.
associated with an increased, rather than a decreased, risk of any revisit with admission. For example, if reevaluation were triggered
revisit (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.6). for an HR in the highest 5% of all discharged ED patients,
62 patients would require reevaluation to potentially prevent 1 re-
visit with admission, and the vast majority (90%) of revisits with
CONCLUSIONS admission would be preceded by a discharge HR that would not
Multiple prior studies in children and adults have shown as- have triggered any reevaluation. This estimation presumes that re-
sociations between abnormal vital signs and more serious illness evaluation would be able to prevent subsequent revisit with admis-
or poorer outcomes,15–24 and clinicians already consider HR in sion; however, it is likely that some of these revisits with
decisions regarding therapy and admission. Our study design did admission were not preventable, and the true number needed to
not directly measure the association between HR and outcomes evaluate would actually be higher.
because, in many cases, HR would have already been incorpo- Clinicians are often advised to follow changes in vital signs
rated into therapy decisions and the decision to admit or discharge. or of scores derived from vital signs.6,25 However, evidence for
Our study evaluated the potential additional benefit of a focused whether and how changes in vital signs or vital sign scores are as-
look at the last recorded HR to avoid poor outcomes after dis- sociated with outcomes is lacking. Among discharged visits with
charge. While we found a weak association between the last re- an elevated HR at any time during the ED visit, resolution of
corded HR and subsequent ED revisit with admission, a detailed tachycardia was associated with an increase in risk of revisit,
analysis and sensitivity analyses did not identify HR cut points rather than a decrease in risk. One possible explanation for this un-
that discriminated well between children at high and low risk of expected finding is ascertainment bias; the decision to wait for
e188 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
TABLE 2. Test Characteristics for Identifying Discharged Visits Followed by Revisit and Admission Within 3 Days Using Cut Points
Selecting Visits With the Highest 5% and 1% of Last Recorded HRs for Age
Highest 5% Highest 1%
Point Estimates 95% CIs Point Estimates 95% CIs
Test + 5.2% 5.0%–5.3% 1.0% 1.0%–1.1%
Sensitivity 10.1% 7.8%–13.0% 2.5% 1.4%–4.2%
Specificity 94.9% 94.7%–95.1% 99.0% 98.9%–99.0%
Positive predictive value 1.6% 1.2%–2.1% 2.0% 1.1%–3.3%
Negative predictive value 99.2% 99.2%–99.3% 99.2% 99.1%–99.3%
Likelihood ratio (+) 2.0 1.5–2.6 2.4 1.4–4.2
Likelihood ratio (−) 0.95 0.7–1.3 0.99 0.6–1.7
Number needed to evaluate 62 48–82 50 30–91
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e189
TABLE 3. Selected Test Characteristics for Sensitivity Analyses of Alternate HR Cut Points, Restricted Inclusion Criteria, and Alternate
Outcomes
Highest 5% Highest 1%
Analysis Sensitivity PPV LR (+) Sensitivity PPV LR (+)
Primary 10.1% 1.6% 2.0 2.5% 2.0% 2.5
Alternate HR types
Triage HR 15.9% 2.2% 2.7 4.3% 2.7% 3.4
Maximum HR 14.9% 2.3% 2.9 4.9% 3.2% 3.9
Temperature-adjusted HR
Adjusted last recorded HR 9.2% 1.5% 1.8 1.6% 1.3% 1.6
Adjusted triage HR 13.5% 1.9% 2.5 3.4% 2.8% 3.4
Restricted inclusion criteria
No albuterol 4.9% 1.2% 1.6 1.1% 1.9% 2.6
Bolus 10.5% 4.3% 2.4 — 0 —
Last HR ≤30 min before discharge 10.6% 2.1% 2.0 2.2% 2.7% 2.6
Alternate outcomes
Any return (3 d) 7.1% 3.8% 1.4 1.5% 4.0% 1.4
Return with ICU admission (3 d) 13.6% 0.1% 2.7 — 0 —
Return admission (1 d) 10.6% 0.5% 2.0 1.7% 0.4% 2.1
Return admission (7 d) 11.1% 2.8% 2.2 3.2% 4.0% 3.2
LR (+) indicates likelihood ratio positive.
fundamentally alter the results. Heart rate measurements were done New York, NY: Office of the Medical Director Office of Quality and
for clinical rather than research purposes and were not measured Patient Safety; 2017.
using standard protocols. This increases the likelihood of measure- 2. Domagala SE. Discharge vital signs: an enhancement to ED quality and
ment error but is representative of how HR measurements are per- patient outcomes. J Emerg Nurs. 2009;35:138–140.
formed when HR-based discharge safety programs are implemented.
3. Warren DW, Jarvis A, LeBlanc L, et al., the CTAS National Working
Evaluation of a single pediatric ED is another limitation. Our Group. Revisions to the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale Paediatric
findings were similar to those in another recent retrospective study Guidelines (PaedCTAS). CJEM. 2008;10:224–243.
of 2 pediatric EDs and 4 pediatric urgent care centers within a
health care system.9 However, we are not aware of any studies 4. Gilboy N, Tanabe P, Travers D, et al Emergency Severity Index (ESI):
of discharge HR and outcomes in general EDs or urgent care cen- A Triage Tool for Emergency Department Care, Version 4. Rockville, MD:
ters. In general EDs, particularly those with a low volume of pedi- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
atric patients, it is possible that HR-based triggers for pediatric 5. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A, et al. International pediatric sepsis
patients may be more beneficial.31 In addition, we were only able consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in
to identify revisits to the single studied ED; some children who pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6:2–8.
revisited a different ED or who accessed outpatient care may have 6. Parshuram CS, Hutchison J, Middaugh K. Development and initial
been misclassified as nonrevisits. As described by Wilson et al,9 validation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score. Crit
we do not believe that any misclassification is likely to be differ- Care. 2009;13:R135.
ential between children with and without elevated HR. We were
7. Akre M, Finkelstein M, Erickson M, et al. Sensitivity of the pediatric early
also unable to assess death at home, which we would expect to warning score to identify patient deterioration. Pediatrics. 2010;125:
be exceedingly rare in a pediatric population. e763–e769.
The most important area for future research may be the de-
velopment of validated outcome measures that more directly as- 8. Pediatric Advanced Life Support. Provider Manual. Dallas, TX: American
sess harm and appropriateness of initial care and discharge. The Heart Association; 2011.
use of the last recorded HR in general EDs and the incorporation 9. Wilson PM, Florin TA, Huang G, et al. Is tachycardia at discharge from the
of HR and other clinical characteristics into a multicomponent pediatric emergency department a cause for concern? A nonconcurrent
clinical decision rule also require further evaluation. cohort study. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70:268–276.
In summary, most discharged patients with an elevated HR in a 10. Rigby R, Stasinopolous D. Generalized additive models for location, scale
pediatric ED do not subsequently require admission, and most pa- and shape (with discussion). J R Stat Soc C. 2005;54:507–554.
tients who require admission after ED discharge did not have an ele-
11. Borghi E, de Onis M, Garza C, et al. Construction of the World Health
vated HR at the end of the initial visit. Our findings support the need
Organization child growth standards: selection of methods for attained
for careful consideration of the impact of HR-based discharge safety
growth curves. Stat Med. 2006;25:247–265.
tools before implementation. Clinicians should also be cautious
when considering resolution of tachycardia in discharge decisions. 12. Daymont C, Bonafide CP, Brady PW. Heart rates in hospitalized
children by age and body temperature. Pediatrics. 2015;135:
e1173–e1181.
REFERENCES 13. Thompson M, Harnden A, Perera R, et al. Deriving temperature and age
1. Roohan PJ, Schettine A, Gesten F, et al New York State Report on Sepsis appropriate heart rate centiles for children with acute infections. Arch Dis
Care Improvement Initiative: Hospital Quality Performance 2015. Child. 2009;94:361–365.
e190 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
14. Davies P, Maconochie I. The relationship between body temperature, 23. Subbe CP, Slater A, Menon D, et al. Validation of physiological scoring
heart rate and respiratory rate in children. Emerg Med J. 2009;26: systems in the accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:
641–643. 841–845.
15. Cruz AT, Perry AM, Williams EA, et al. Implementation of goal-directed 24. Yu J-H, Weng Y-M, Chen K-F, et al. Triage vital signs predict in-hospital
therapy for children with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. mortality among emergency department patients with acute poisoning: a
Pediatrics. 2011;127:e758–e766. case control study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:262–269.
16. Barfod C, Lauritzen MM, Danker JK, et al. Abnormal vital signs 25. Rothman MJ, Tepas JJ3rd, Nowalk AJ, et al. Development and validation of
are strong predictors for intensive care unit admission and a continuously age-adjusted measure of patient condition for hospitalized
in-hospital mortality in adults triaged in the emergency department—a children using the electronic medical record. J Biomed Inform. 2017;66:
prospective cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 180–193.
2012;20:28. 26. Nguyen OK, Makam AN, Clark C, et al. Vital signs are still vital: instability
17. Berger T, Green J, Horeczko T, et al. Shock index and early recognition of on discharge and the risk of post-discharge adverse outcomes. J Gen Intern
sepsis in the emergency department: pilot study. West J Emerg Med. 2013; Med. 2017;32:42–48.
14:168–174. 27. Sabbatini AK, Kocher KE, Basu A, et al. In-hospital outcomes and costs
18. Considine J, Thomas S, Potter R. Predictors of critical care admission in among patients hospitalized during a return visit to the emergency
emergency department patients triaged as low to moderate urgency. J Adv department. JAMA. 2016;315:663–671.
Nurs. 2009;65:818–827. 28. Pham JC, Kirsch TD, Hill PM, et al. Seventy-two-hour returns may not be a
19. Hong W, Earnest A, Sultana P, et al. How accurate are vital signs in good indicator of safety in the emergency department: a national study:
predicting clinical outcomes in critically ill emergency department patients. 72-hour returns are not a good ED safety indicator. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013;20:27–32. 18:390–397.
20. Horeczko T, Wintemute GJ. Asthma vital signs at triage: home or 29. Abualenain J, Frohna WJ, Smith M, et al. The prevalence of quality issues
admission (ASTHmA). Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:175–182. and adverse outcomes among 72-hour return admissions in the emergency
21. Ley EJ, Singer MB, Clond MA, et al. Admission heart rate department. J Emerg Med. 2013;45:281–288.
is a predictor of mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72: 30. Hsia RY, Asch SM, Weiss RE, et al. Is emergency department crowding
943–947. associated with increased “bounceback” admissions? Med Care. 2013;51:
22. Olsson T, Terent A, Lind L. Rapid Emergency Medicine score: 1008–1014.
a new prognostic tool for in-hospital mortality in nonsurgical 31. Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW. Emergency care for children in pediatric and
emergency department patients. J Intern Med. 2004;255:579–587. general emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007;23:94–102.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e191
e192 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
Prognostic Indicators Normal or Mild Disability Severe Disability or Vegetative State Deaths P
Witnessed drowning 27 (96.4%) 0 1 (3.6%) 0.024
Unwitnessed drowning 67 (69.1%) 10 (10.3%) 20 (20.6%)
No CPR 18 (100%) 0 0 <0.001
Basic CPR 58 (100%) 0 0
Advanced CPR (intubation only) 17 (81.0%) 2 (9.5%) 2 (9.5%)
Advanced CPR (intubation and epinephrine) 1 (3.7%) 8 (29.6%) 18 (66.7%)
GCS score ≤5 19 (40.4%) 10 (21.3%) 18 (38.3%) <0.001
GCS score >5 78 (96.3%) 0 3 (3.7%)
Mydriatic, nonreactive pupils 3 (13.0%) 4 (17.4%) 16 (69.6%) <0.001
Nonmydriatic, reactive pupils 92 (90.2%) 5 (4.9%) 5 (4.9%)
pH <7.1 9 (33.3%) 3 (11.1%) 15 (55.6%) <0.001
pH ≥7.1 84 (91.3%) 7 (7.6%) 1 (1.1%)
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e193
TABLE 3. Values of Temperature, GCS Score, pH, Bicarbonate, and Glucose, Depending on the Type of CPR
Clinical Situation and No CPR Basic CPR Advanced CPR Advanced CPR (Intubation and
Additional Tests at Admission (n = 18) (n = 58) (Intubation Only) (n = 21) Epinephrine) (n = 27) P
Temperature, mean (SD), °C 36.4 (0.9) 36.4 (0.8) 35.6 (1.6) 34.0 (1.8)* <0.001
GCS score, median (SD) 14 11 5* 3* <0.001
pH, average (SD) 7.27 (0.09) 7.26 (0.1) 7.19 (0.17) 6.94 (0.21)* <0.001
Bicarbonate, average (SD), mmol/L 21.1 (4.1) 19.9 (6.9) 18.4 (4.9) 12.1 (4.9)* 0.001
Glucose, mean (SD), mg/dL 152.6 (65.1) 188.9 (81.0) 230.5 (80.0) 295.7 (127.3)† 0.001
*P < 0.003 for comparison with other variables.
†
P < 0.001 versus no CPR and versus basic CPR.
In the group of patients who needed advanced CPR with en- higher had a better prognosis compared with those with a pH be-
dotracheal intubation (but without administering epinephrine), low 7.10 (good course in 91.3% of patients with pH ≥7.1), but this
19% had poor outcomes. It was not possible to differentiate other factor has a less strong association with prognosis than the type of
factors of poor prognosis because of the sample size in this group CPR. Bicarbonate values were also lower in more severe patients
(21 patients). That requires a larger sample of patients who need than in patients without sequelae. Lower pH and bicarbonate
endotracheal intubation without intravenous administration of epi- could be due to poor tissue perfusion because of long immersion
nephrine to analyze the factors of good or poor prognosis for or to prolonged ischemia during resuscitation.
this subgroup. In the group of more severely affected patients, in which ad-
Finally, in patients who required advanced CPR with epi- vanced CPR maneuvers were performed, higher blood glucose
nephrine administration, poor outcomes were observed in all but levels were also observed. In previous studies, higher blood glu-
one. Therefore, the need for such maneuvers very clearly predicts cose levels had been suggested as a factor of severity at admission
poor outcome. to the PICU. In this group, more complications in their clinical
Recently, Mtaweh and colleagues,1 with a 60-case series, course, such as seizures, ARDS, hemodynamic compromise,
also reported good outcomes in patients with only respiratory ar- and kidney failure, were registered.14,15
rest and poor outcome in patients with cardiac arrest. It is doubtful whether patients who drowned in cold water
The variable of immersion duration is difficult to measure have a better prognosis because of a neuroprotective effect of hy-
because data at the event location are often confused. In our study, pothermia. In our environment (the Mediterranean Sea), the water
we collected data to whether drowning was witnessed, accepting is warm; therefore, initial hypothermia usually indicates pro-
that at witnessed drowning immersion time is lower. It seems ob- longed immersion time. This is confirmed by the fact that the tem-
vious to assume that children with lower immersion time would perature recorded was significantly lower in those patients who
have better neurological status and better prognosis. In our series, required advanced CPR with epinephrine administration than in
prognosis was good in cases of witnessed drowning. It was found other groups.12,13
that when drowning was not witnessed, more important resuscita- Therapeutic hypothermia is described as a neuroprotective
tion measures were applied, and the prognosis was worse.14 therapy in patients who suffer a cardiac arrest. There are some
Neurological examination following an event should initially published cases of good neurological outcome after performing
assess GCS score and the status of pupils. A worse GCS score, 3 to therapeutic hypothermia in patients with cardiac arrest who re-
5 out of 15, is described in the literature as a poor prognostic fac- quired advanced CPR after drowning. In our study, hypothermia
tor. Our series confirmed that patients with low GCS values had was applied to a few patients, with no improved prognosis of those
worse prognoses, and patients with GCS values higher than who required advanced CPR, although the number of cases was
5 had a good prognosis (96.3%). By matching GCS and the type not enough to draw conclusions from. A longer sample would
of resuscitation, we concluded that in the patients who required be necessary to confirm these data, but it seems that in patients
advanced CPR GCS values were lower than those in the other with a poor initial neurological prognosis (those who required ad-
groups. The same applies to the size and reactivity of the pupils, vanced CPR with intravenous administration of epinephrine) it
with the worst prognosis in patients with unreactive mydriatic pu- may be unnecessary to take such measures.16
pils at the initial examination (good course in 90.2% of patients The relevance of this study is a possibility to predict with
who did not exhibit mydriatic, nonreactive pupils at admission). high reliability the neurological outcome in a child who has suf-
A pH below 7.10 has also been suggested as a poor prognos- fered an episode of drowning. It can be helpful for the information
tic factor. Our study confirmed that patients with a pH of 7.10 or to the family and to guide treatment after initial resuscitation.
e194 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Because these patients are potential organ donors, all intensive 3. Ahogamientos. Nota descriptiva N°347 Abril de 2014. WHO. Available at:
support despite the prognosis should be initially managed to as- http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs347/es/. Accessed November
sess this possibility with the family. 9, 2015.
In this study, a prospective cohort of patients was grouped 4. Water Sanitation Health. Water-related Diseases. WHO. Available at: http://
with a retrospective one. Because they were admitted to an inten- www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/diseases/drowning/en/. Accessed
sive care unit, data were collected systematically in graphic and November 9, 2015.
medical records, so few data about patients from the retrospective 5. Orlowski JP. Prognostic factors in pediatric cases of drowning and
group were lost (<10% in every category). This allows for analysis near-drowning. JACEP. 1979;8:176–179.
of a greater number of patients by minimizing the potential of error 6. Biggart MJ, Bohn DJ. Effect of hypothermia and cardiac arrest on outcome
in analyzed variables. Recruiting 131 patients from the same center of near-drowning accidents in children. J Pediatr. 1990;117:179–183.
eliminates differences in treatments between hospitals.
7. Dean JM, Kaufman ND. Prognostic indicators in pediatric near-drowning:
Our study has some limitations. We did not dispose data from
the Glasgow Coma Scale. Crit Care Med. 1981;9:536–539.
those patients who suffered drowning and, after initial resuscita-
tion, improved enough to decline an admission to intensive care. 8. Lavelle JM, Shaw KN. Near drowning: is emergency department
The other group of patients who could not be analyzed is that of cardiopulmonary resuscitation or intensive care unit cerebral resuscitation
those who died before hospital admission. indicated? Crit Care Med. 1993;21:368–373.
Because of the limited number of patients per year, it was not 9. Bierens JJ, van der Velde EA, van Berkel M, et al. Submersion in the
possible to check whether changes in care practices over time or in Netherlands: prognostic indicators and results of resuscitation. Ann Emerg
CPR recommendations improved neurological outcome. A multi- Med. 1990;19:1390–1395.
center study would be needed. 10. Suominen P, Baillie C, Korpela R, et al. Impact of age, submersion time and
water temperature on outcome in near-drowning. Resuscitation. 2002;52:
CONCLUSIONS 247–254.
The need for advanced CPR on the scene with epinephrine 11. Habib DM, Tecklenburg FW, Webb SA, et al. Prediction of childhood
administration in drowned children predicts poor neurological drowning and near-drowning morbidity and mortality. Pediatr Emerg Care.
outcome (severe encephalopathy or death) with great reliability. 1996;12:255–258.
Other prognostic factors associated with poor neurological out- 12. Tipton MJ, Golden FS. A proposed decision-making guide for the search,
come depend on the type of resuscitation required. rescue and resuscitation of submersion (head under) victims based on
It is confirmed that the sickest patients, who required more expert opinion. Resuscitation. 2011;82:819–824.
intensive resuscitation measures, had lower temperature, GCS 13. Quan L, Mack CD, Schiff MA. Association of water temperature and
score, and bicarbonate and pH values and higher blood glucose submersion duration and drowning outcome. Resuscitation. 2014;
levels. They also had a higher incidence of seizures, ARDS, he- 85:790.
modynamic impairment, and kidney failure. 14. Blasco Alonso J, Moreno Pérez D, Milano Manso G, et al. Ahogamientos y
casi ahogamientos en niños. An Pediatr (Barc). 2005;62:20–24.
REFERENCES 15. Burford AE, Ryan LM, Stone BJ, et al.: Drowning and near-drowning in
1. Mtaweh H, Kochanek PM, Carcillo JA, et al. Patterns of multiorgan children and adolescents: a succinct review for emergency physicians and
dysfunction after pediatric drowning. Resuscitation. 2015;90:91–96. nurses. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005;21:610–616.
2. Idris AH, Berg RA, Bierens J, et al. Recommended guidelines for uniform 16. Aronovich DM, Ritchie KL, Mesuk JL. Asystolic cardiac arrest from near
reporting of data from drowning: the “Utstein style”. Resuscitation. 2003; drowning managed with therapeutic hypothermia. West J Emerg Med.
59:45–57. 2014;15:369–371.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e195
e196 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
All statistical analyses were performed using Stata/SE ver- We limited outcomes to acute hospitalization from the index
sion 16.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, Tex). The study was deter- ED visit, defined as the first 4 days of the encounter. We defined a
mined to be exempt by our institutional review board. The study critical intervention as an encounter with a critical medical and/or
was approved by the administrators of the PHIS database. In ac- neurosurgical intervention. We defined critical medical interven-
cordance with PHIS policies, the identities of the institutions were tions as hyperosmotic agent administration and/or nonoperative
not reported. endotracheal intubation. We defined repeat neuroimaging as either
a brain CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in addition
to the initial brain CT scan. We recorded demographic factors,
trauma center designation, freestanding versus nonfreestanding
Study Population, Definitions, and Assumptions children's hospital, hospital length of stay, ICU admission,
All children younger than 18 years with an ED encounter hyperosmotic agent (hypertonic saline or mannitol) administration,
from January 1, 2010, through June 30, 2019, who were hospital- nonoperative endotracheal intubation, neurosurgical procedures
ized for a principal diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage and had (operations, external ventricular drains, or intracranial monitors),
at least 1 brain computed tomography (CT) scan performed on the and hemorrhage subtype. We identified hemorrhage subtypes by
day of their index ED visit were eligible for inclusion. We used the billing codes and grouped them into 7 categories: intraparenchymal,
principal diagnosis code to define intracranial hemorrhage. We in- cerebellar or brainstem, other, mixed (subarachnoid and/or subdural
cluded only children hospitalized during the ED encounter and and/or epidural), isolated subdural, isolated subarachnoid, and iso-
who had a brain CT scan performed on the day of their index lated epidural (full list of billing codes outlined in Supplemental
ED visit to capture the target sample of children with acute intra- Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/PEC/A680).
cranial hemorrhage, as hospitalization and CT as the initial neuro-
imaging modality are standard practice.
The unit of analysis was the ED encounter, which was classi- Analysis
fied as a case with intracranial hemorrhage if any International Our primary goal was to estimate rates of critical medical and
Classification of Diseases (ICD) Ninth Revision (ICD-9) or 10th neurosurgical interventions for children with traumatic intracra-
Revision (ICD-10) codes for intracranial hemorrhage were nial hemorrhage. We hypothesized that critical interventions occur
assigned as the principal diagnosis from the index ED visit. The infrequently in children with intracranial hemorrhage, whereas the
full list of diagnostic codes used for case ascertainment is listed ICU and repeat neuroimaging are used frequently. In order to ex-
in Supplemental Digital Content 1 (http://links.lww.com/PEC/ plore high-level factors in children with intracranial hemorrhage
A680). We defined hospitalization by inpatient or observation who did not undergo a critical intervention, we examined
codes. We excluded children with any complex chronic condi- hospital- and encounter-level demographic and diagnostic factors,
tions, including those with malignancy and hematologic disorders, independent of institution, which were associated with critical
based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes defined by Feudtner et al,14 be- interventions.
cause the risk of neurologic deterioration and ability to monitor We calculated frequencies and proportions for categorical
clinically may be different in these children. For patients with mul- variables and analyzed them with χ2 tests of homogeneity. We de-
tiple ED encounters, we included only the first ED visit for intra- scribed continuous variables as medians with interquartile ranges
cranial hemorrhage during the study period in order to best (IQRs) and analyzed them with the Mann-Whitney U test. We de-
capture the care provided during acute hospitalization. termined the rates of critical interventions, ICU admission, and
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e197
repeat neuroimaging. Hospital day of service of critical interven- covariates that were significantly associated (P < 0.1) with undergo-
tions performed was analyzed. In order to explore demographic ing a critical intervention in univariable analysis and retained those
and diagnostic factors associated with critical interventions, we that remained associated with the outcome in multivariable modeling
created logistic regression models to determine whether each fac- (P < 0.05) or were confounders (>10% change in association between
tor retained an independent association with critical interventions, covariates and critical interventions regardless of P value) in the final
our primary outcome. To account for potential nonindependence model. For sensitivity analyses, we refit the model among the subset
among encounters at each hospital because of institutional similarities of children admitted to the ICU and for the outcome of neurosurgical
in practice patterns, we used hierarchical multivariable logistic regres- intervention. We calculated the final model area under the curve of
sion models with the institution as the random effect.15–17 We first the receiver operating characteristic plot with 95% confidence inter-
constructed a baseline, encounter-level model without covariates vals (CIs).
using the institution as the grouping variable. We chose covariates a
priori based on published literature, our hypothesis, and after examin-
ing both the clinical and the statistical significance from the RESULTS
univariable analysis. The initial set of covariates entered into the
model were two hospital-level factors based on the literature: level Study Sample
1 trauma center designation and whether the hospital was a freestand- The study flowchart is depicted in Figure 1. For this study,
ing children's hospital. We then sequentially entered encounter-level data from 35 hospitals with complete demographic and billing
TABLE 1. Hospital- and Encounter-Level Characteristics, Stratified by Critical Intervention, of Children With Intracranial
Hemorrhage in US Pediatric Hospitals From 2010 to 2019
e198 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
TABLE 2. Frequency of Critical Medical and Neurosurgical Interventions, ICU Admission, and Repeat Neuroimaging in Children
With Intracranial Hemorrhage, by Hemorrhage Type
information during the study period were eligible for inclusion in Critical Interventions, ICU Admission, and Repeat
the analysis. During the study period of January 1, 2010, through Neuroimaging
June 30, 2019, 29,978 ED visits for intracranial hemorrhage were
identified from 35 pediatric hospitals. After eliminating cases based Rates of critical interventions, ICU admission, and repeat
on a priori exclusions, 12,714 encounters of children admitted neuroimaging stratified by hemorrhage subtype are outlined in
through the ED with intracranial hemorrhage constituted the study Table 2. We found that rates of all 3 outcomes varied by hemor-
sample. Hospital- and encounter-level characteristics are displayed rhage subtype, with each occurring most in children with isolated
in Table 1. The sample was predominantly male (62.2%) with a me- epidural hemorrhage (17.2% critical intervention, 53.8% ICU ad-
dian (IQR) age of 4.3 (0.7–11.0) years. Median (IQR) length of stay mission, and 50.9% repeat neuroimaging). Overall, we found that
was 2 (1–3) days. Mortality was 0.8% (n = 104). 11.6% (n = 1470) of children underwent a critical medical or
FIGURE 2. Hospital day of service for critical medical and neurosurgical interventions in subgroup of children with intracranial hemorrhage
who underwent critical interventions.
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e199
neurosurgical intervention. Critical medical interventions oc- CI, 0.92–0.99), isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR, 0.91;
curred in 9.6% (n = 1219) of children with intracranial hemor- 95% CI, 0.88–0.95), and other hemorrhage subtypes (OR, 0.89;
rhage, and neurosurgical interventions occurred in 3.3% 95% CI, 0.83–0.96) were less likely to undergo a critical intervention.
(n = 419). The majority of critical medical and neurosurgical inter- Epidural hemorrhage (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00–1.06) was indepen-
ventions were performed on hospital day 1 (Fig. 2). dently associated with undergoing a critical medical and/or neurosur-
Forty-four percent (n = 5565) were admitted to the ICU dur- gical intervention and with undergoing a neurosurgical intervention
ing the study period. Of the children admitted to the ICU, 78.5% (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06–1.15; Supplemental Digital Content 2,
(n = 4366) did not undergo a critical intervention. Repeat neuroim- http://links.lww.com/PEC/A681). The final random-effects model
aging (either repeat CT or MRI) was performed in 39.9% for critical interventions had an area under the curve of 0.66 (95%
(n = 5072), of which 67.6% (n = 3429) were a CT scan, and CI, 0.65–0.67). Results were similar in the sensitivity analysis of chil-
32.4% (n = 1643) were an MRI. Of the 11,244 children who did dren admitted to the ICU (Table 3, Fig. 3).
not receive a critical medical or neurosurgical intervention, 38.8%
(n = 4366) underwent ICU admission, and 36.5% (n = 4099)
underwent repeat neuroimaging. Repeat neuroimaging occurred DISCUSSION
on the day of hospital discharge in 10.6% (n = 1349) of children. In a large sample of children hospitalized at US pediatric
medical centers for intracranial hemorrhage, we found that
nearly half of children were admitted to the ICU and underwent re-
Factors Associated With Critical Interventions peat neuroimaging, whereas critical medical interventions oc-
Results of the final hierarchical multivariable logistic regres- curred in 10% of children, and neurosurgical interventions
sion model are detailed in Table 3 and displayed in Figure 3. In occurred in 3%. Most children who were admitted to the ICU
multivariable modeling, among hemorrhage subtypes, children and/or underwent repeat neuroimaging did not undergo critical
with isolated subdural hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% interventions.
TABLE 3. Final Random-Effects Model for Critical Intervention* in Children With Intracranial Hemorrhage and Among the Subset of
Children Admitted to the ICU
All ICU
Factors OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Encounter-level factors
Age 1.00 (1.00–1.00)† <0.001 1.00 (1.00–1.00)‡ <0.001
Female sex 0.86 (0.76–0.97) 0.011 0.85 (0.73–0.97) 0.020
Race
White Reference group — Reference group —
Black 1.30 (1.11–1.53) 0.001 1.41 (1.16–1.70) <0.001
Asian 0.81 (0.55–1.20) 0.301 1.15 (0.73–1.80) 0.555
Other 0.98 (0.80–1.19) 0.826 0.91 (0.71–1.17) 0.452
Missing 0.67 (0.48–0.93) 0.018 0.62 (0.42–0.92) 0.016
Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic/Latino Reference group — Reference group —
Hispanic/Latino 0.97 (0.81–1.16) 0.715 0.96 (0.77–1.20) 0.742
Other 1.69 (1.32–2.17) <0.001 1.62 (1.21–2.17) 0.001
Insurance
Private Reference group — Reference group —
Public 1.34 (1.17–1.52) <0.001 1.27 (1.09–1.48) 0.002
Other 1.29 (1.06–1.59) 0.013 1.30 (1.02–1.65) 0.032
Calendar year 1.06 (1.04–1.09) <0.001 1.10 (1.07–1.14) <0.001
Hemorrhage subtype
Mixed§ Reference group — Reference group —
Intraparenchymal 1.11 (0.92–1.34) 0.276 1.24 (0.99–1.55) 0.062
Cerebellar or brainstem 0.61 (0.37–1.02) 0.060 0.65 (0.31–1.37) 0.259
Other 0.89 (0.83–0.96) 0.002 0.96 (0.89–1.05) 0.376
Isolated subdural 0.96 (0.92–0.99) 0.013 0.95 (0.92–1.00||) 0.028
Isolated subarachnoid 0.91 (0.88–0.95) <0.001 0.94 (0.90–0.99) 0.014
Isolated epidural 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 0.024 0.99 (0.96–1.03) 0.618
*Hyperosmotic agent administration (mannitol or hypertonic saline) and/or neurosurgical intervention.
†
1.000189 (1.000161–1.000216).
‡
1.000134 (1.000100–1.000167).
§
Multiple hemorrhage types (subarachnoid and/or subdural and/or epidural).
||
0.9951.
e200 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
We found that both ICU admission and repeat neuroimaging We also identified specific hemorrhage subtypes that were
are utilized in a large percentage of children with intracranial hem- associated with whether a child underwent a critical intervention.
orrhage, even among children who did not undergo any critical Children with isolated subdural and isolated subarachnoid hemor-
medical or neurosurgical intervention. The proportion of children rhage, which are generally lesions that are less severe and/or non-
with intracranial hemorrhage who undergo repeat neuroimaging operative, were less likely to undergo a critical medical and/or
in published literature varies from 40% to 88%.1,4–11 In our sam- neurosurgical intervention. We found that children who did not
ple, we found the proportion was 40%. The lower rates in our large undergo critical interventions underwent ICU admission and re-
sample were likely due to inclusion of less severe children with in- peat neuroimaging at similar numbers as the entire cohort. In
tracranial hemorrhage compared with previous literature,4–11 but our sample, there were 4366 children admitted to the ICU and
one that is more reflective of the heterogeneous nature and range 4099 children who underwent repeat neuroimaging who did not
of severity of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in children. We undergo critical interventions, suggesting a number of children
found that 10% of children received either a critical medical or with intracranial hemorrhage undergo potentially avoidable ICU
neurosurgical intervention. We also found that most children admissions and repeat neuroimaging. Admittedly, the decision to
who were admitted to the ICU and who underwent repeat neuro- admit to the ICU for closer monitoring and obtain repeat neuroim-
imaging did not undergo a critical medical or neurosurgical inter- aging may have also prevented the need for critical intervention;
vention. Although clinical data are not available regarding however, our findings highlight the variability and challenges as-
neurologic status for these children, previous literature highlights sociated with identifying disease severity and risk of hemorrhage
that acute intervention is rare after routine repeat neuroimaging in progression. Whereas Greenberg et al1 derived a clinical risk score
the absence of clinically important neurologic deterioration2,3 and to predict need for ICU admission for children with mild TBI,
that ICU admission may not be necessary for lower-risk children.1 Flaherty et al5 found that even among the more severe epidural
The risk of missing a child with progressive hemorrhage or hemorrhage subtype, utilizing clinical and radiographic predictors
increased intracranial pressure presents a diagnostic challenge can improve risk stratification for these children. From the per-
for clinicians and often leads to routine ICU admission and spective of the treating clinician, targeting the decision for ICU ad-
reimaging and substantial practice variation.18 Because many mission and repeat neuroimaging based on risk stratification
children requiring critical interventions display symptoms to could eliminate unnecessary resource utilization for a large num-
inform the decision, targeting the decision to admit to the ber of children at low risk of critical interventions.
ICU and reimage can decrease unnecessary neuroimaging Our investigation has several important limitations. We lever-
and additional resource utilization, especially for lower-risk le- aged a large administrative database, which allows for a high-level
sions. Furthermore, nonactionable findings on routine repeat examination of resource utilization in children with intracranial
neuroimaging can lead to additional unnecessary scans, inter- hemorrhage but does not allow patient-level review for clinical
ventions, and resource utilization without benefit.9 Better risk characteristics such as severity of injury or the appropriateness
stratification1 would aid clinicians making decisions at the of clinical and imaging decisions. Although we were able to ob-
bedside, improve overall quality of care in these children, and tain estimates of rates of critical interventions, neuroimaging,
decrease unnecessary resource utilization. and ICU admissions, because of limitations of the database, we
FIGURE 3. Final random-effects model for critical intervention in all children with intracranial hemorrhage and among the subgroup of
children with intracranial hemorrhage admitted to the ICU.
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e201
were unable to characterize the timing of these outcomes or dis- 3. Hollingworth W, Vavilala MS, Jarvik JG, et al. The use of repeated head
cern whether a patient was transferred from the floor to the ICU. computed tomography in pediatric blunt head trauma: factors predicting
Additionally, the diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage was based new and worsening brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8:348–356.
on diagnostic codes, rather than clinical data, and coding differ- 4. Howe J, Fitzpatrick CM, Lakam DR, et al. Routine repeat brain computed
ences exist between ICD-9 and ICD-10. Also, to better identify tomography in all children with mild traumatic brain injury may result in
our target sample, we included those who were admitted with a unnecessary radiation exposure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:
principal diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage and had at least 1 292–295.
CT scan obtained. Because of our inclusion criteria, children 5. Flaherty BF, Moore HE, Riva-Cambrin J, et al. Repeat head CT for
who died in the ED prior to admission or who had billing codes expectant management of traumatic epidural hematoma. Pediatrics. 2018;
for polytrauma were not included, and because of the low mortal- 142:e20180385.
ity rate, we were unable to meaningfully examine mortality data 6. Dawson EC, Montgomery CP, Frim D, et al. Is repeat head computed
stratified by hemorrhage subtype. Although it is likely that we in- tomography necessary in children admitted with mild head injury and
cluded some encounters that were not our target sample, we fo- normal neurological exam? Pediatr Neurosurg. 2012;48:221–224.
cused on high-level outcomes to assess for overall rates in
7. Aziz H, Rhee P, Pandit V, et al. Mild and moderate pediatric traumatic brain
critical interventions, ICU admission, and repeat neuroimaging. injury: replace routine repeat head computed tomography with neurologic
For generalizability, we aimed to identify an otherwise examination. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:550–554.
healthy population of children presenting with intracranial hemor-
8. Murray BL, Mitchell AM, Scarboro SC. Do repeat head CT scans after
rhage. Although we excluded patients with a chronic comorbid
blunt head trauma change management in the pediatric patient? Ann Emerg
condition, we were unable to exclude all possible comorbidities
Med. 2013;62:S67.
that could influence clinical decisions. However, with our exclu-
sion criteria and large sample of patients, the rates observed likely 9. Hill EP, Stiles PJ, Reyes J, et al. Repeat head imaging in blunt pediatric
reflect rates in our target sample. Our sample represents children trauma patients: is it necessary? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82:
at major US pediatric hospitals, and our results might not be gen- 896–900.
eralizable to other settings. Because encounters are tracked longi- 10. Patel SK, Gozal YM, Krueger BM, et al. Routine surveillance imaging
tudinally at a single institution, we do not know whether any following mild traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage may not
children presented to a different institution for follow-up. More- be necessary. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53:2048–2054.
over, we cannot comment on other important clinical outcomes 11. Bata SC, Yung M. Role of routine repeat head imaging in paediatric
for this sample. traumatic brain injury. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84:438–441.
12. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, et al. Guidelines for the Management
of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, third edition: update of the
CONCLUSIONS Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20:
In a large sample of children with intracranial hemorrhage, S1–S82.
we found that ICU admission and repeat neuroimaging were com- 13. Tabori U, Kornecki A, Sofer S, et al. Repeat computed tomographic scan
mon, even among those who did not undergo critical medical or within 24–48 hours of admission in children with moderate and severe head
neurosurgical interventions. Critical medical interventions oc- trauma. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:840–844.
curred in 10% of children with intracranial hemorrhage, whereas
14. Feudtner C, Feinstein JA, Zhong W, et al. Pediatric complex chronic
neurosurgical interventions occurred in 3%. Further understand-
conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and
ing is needed on how to best implement selective utilization of in- complex medical technology dependence and transplantation.
tensive care monitoring and repeat neuroimaging among children BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:199.
with intracranial hemorrhage who are at low risk of critical
15. Wong GY, Mason WM. The hierarchical logistic regression model for
interventions.
multilevel analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1985;80:513–524.
16. Epstein D, Wong CF, Khemani RG, et al. Race/ethnicity is not associated
REFERENCES with mortality in the PICU. Pediatrics. 2011;127:e588–e597.
1. Greenberg JK, Yan Y, Carpenter CR, et al. Development and internal 17. Khemani RG, Smith L, Lopez-Fernandez YM, et al. Paediatric acute
validation of a clinical risk score for treating children with mild head respiratory distress syndrome incidence and epidemiology (PARDIE): an
trauma and intracranial injury. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:342–349. international, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7:115–128.
2. Figg RE, Stouffer CW, Vander Kolk WE, et al. Clinical efficacy of serial 18. Greenberg JK, Jeffe DB, Carpenter CR, et al. North American survey on
computed tomographic scanning in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. the post-neuroimaging management of children with mild head injuries.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;22:215–218. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;23:227–235.
e202 www.pec-online.com © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
A Traumatic Quinceañera
Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome in an Adolescent Girl
Eric A. Russell, MD,* Richard M. Braverman, MD,† Sanjeev A. Vasudevan, MD,‡ and Binita Patel, MD*
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com e203
e204 www.pec-online.com © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
REFERENCES
1. Merrett ND, Wilson RB, Cosman P, et al. Superior mesenteric artery
syndrome: diagnosis and treatment strategies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:
287–292.
2. Welsch T, Büchler MW, Kienle P. Recalling superior mesenteric artery
syndrome. Dig Surg. 2007;24:149–156.
3. Unal B, Aktas A, Kemal G, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome:
CT and ultrasonography findings. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005;11:90–95.
4. Shiu JR, Chao HC, Luo CC, et al. Clinical and nutritional outcomes in
children with idiopathic superior mesenteric artery syndrome. J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51:177–182.
5. Biank V, Werlin S. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in children:
a 20-year experience. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;42:522–525.
FIGURE 4. Upper GI performed 15 days after presentation 6. Murthi GV, Raine PA. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in children.
showing the second portion of the duodenum to be nondilated Scott Med J. 2001;46:153–154.
(D) and abundant material reaching nondilated jejunum (J).
7. Desai MH, Gall A, Khoo M. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome—a rare
symptoms with her additional intentional weight loss before her presentation and challenge in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a case report
party and external compression. She was readmitted 2 days later and literature review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:544–547.
for 4 days, again with vomiting and epigastric abdominal pain. 8. Keskin M, Akgül T, Bayraktar A, et al. Superior mesenteric artery
She was treated conservatively through gastric decompression. syndrome: an infrequent complication of scoliosis surgery. Case Rep Surg.
During this admission, she had an upper endoscopy that demon- 2014;2014:263431.
strated gastritis but was otherwise unremarkable. A repeat upper 9. Falcone JL, Garrett KO. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome after blunt
GI showed normal gastric emptying and peristalsis (Fig. 4). Since abdominal trauma: a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010;44:
discharge, she has been followed up by pediatric gastroenterology 410–412.
and surgery and has had no further symptoms. 10. Kepros JP. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome after multiple trauma.
J Trauma. 2002;53:1028.
CONCLUSIONS 11. Smith BM, Zyromski NJ, Purtill MA. Superior mesenteric artery
Superior mesenteric artery syndrome is an infrequent but syndrome: an underrecognized entity in the trauma population. J Trauma.
well-described condition. The symptoms are nonspecific but can 2008;64:827–830.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e205
e206 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
FIGURE 1. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition. Organophosphates function by binding to AChE in nerve cells and rendering this enzyme
inactive. The OP phosphorylates the serine hydroxyl moiety in the enzyme's active site. Aging is a process when the phosphorylated
cholinesterase undergoes a dealkylation reaction; loss of 1 of the 2 alkyl groups attached to the bound phosphate. The enzyme then
undergoes conformation and stability changes, which converts the irreversibly inhibited enzyme to one that is inactive. Once aging
has occurred, the enzyme is refractory to oxime. Oximes reverse the inhibition of AChE by dephosphorylating the serine moiety (figure
from Gonçalves et al11).
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e207
e208 www.pec-online.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
12. Holstege CP, Dobmeier SG, Bechtel LK. Critical care toxicology. Emerg 18. King AM, Aaron CK. Organophosphate and carbamate poisoning. Emerg
Med Clin North Am. 2008;26:715–739, viii-ix. Med Clin North Am. 2015;33:133–151.
13. Jamal GA. Neurological syndromes of organophosphorus compounds. 19. Lifshitz M, Rotenberg M, Sofer S, et al. Carbamate poisoning and oxime
Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev. 1997;16:133–170. treatment in children: a clinical and laboratory study. Pediatrics. 1994;93:
14. Rotenberg JS, Newmark J. Nerve agent attacks on children: diagnosis and 652–655.
management. Pediatrics. 2003;112:648–658. 20. Eddleston M, Roberts D, Buckley N. Management of severe
15. Farrar HC, Wells TG, Kearns GL. Use of continuous infusion of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. Crit Care. 2002;6:259.
pralidoxime for treatment of organophosphate poisoning in children. 21. Eddleston M, Buckley NA, Eyer P, et al. Management of acute
J Pediatr. 1990;116:658–661. organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. Lancet. 2008;371:597–607.
16. Leikin JB, Thomas RG, Walter FG, et al. A review of nerve agent 22. Jokanovic M, Stukalov PV, Kosanovic M. Organophosphate induced
exposure for the critical care physician. Crit Care Med. 2002;30: delayed polyneuropathy. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord. 2002;1:
2346–2354. 593–602.
17. Walter FG, Klein R, Thomas RG: Advanced hazmat life support provider 23. Clegg DJ, van Gemert M. Expert panel report of human studies on
manual. 2nd ed. Tucson, AZ: Arizona Board of Regents, 2000; chlorpyrifos and/or other organophosphate exposures. J Toxicol Environ
pp 279–304. Health B Crit Rev. 1999;2:257–279.
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e209
e210 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
case, the time frame of 6 minutes would make this the longest doc- 6 minutes postterminating CPR, a palpable pulse and movements
umented pediatric case. Adult cases have been reported to have were noted. The clinical question turns significantly at this point
ROSC up to 10 minutes after CPR.3 and in this scenario becomes “when is someone deemed alive fol-
None of the previously reported pediatric cases had a favor- lowing a cardiac arrest?” Does a palpable pulse in isolation signify
able outcome. For 3 patients, care was withdrawn either immedi- life? When combined with movement, despite no response to
ately or within the first few days postarrest. The fourth survived painful stimulus or pupillary response, is this enough to warrant
for approximately 5 months but passed away in the setting of di- recommencing active support? Are these movements a sign of life
lated cardiomyopathy. In our case, the child is alive 1 year after or simply a feature of spinal reflexes?
this event but has been left with severe neurological sequelae, with In this case, the actions taken followed current resuscitation
a significant effect on both his and his family's quality of life. guidelines; CPR was started in a bid to regain a cardiac output
The role of bedside ultrasound or cardiac echo in pediatric and signs of life, which when obtained were acted upon. The fam-
cardiac arrests remains unclear. Supporters would suggest that it ily was consulted, and a decision was reached for intensive care,
has the potential to rapidly identify tamponade, tension pneumo- with the patient remaining alive to date, although with a poor neu-
thorax, thromboembolism, and hypovolemia using predominantly rological outcome. However, this is not a universally held view,
adult studies to back up their conclusions.7 The evidence in pediat- with those supporting a more neurological certification of death
ric cardiac arrest is lacking and limited to case series and reports.8 stating their belief that death is not a singular event but a process.
To date, neither Advanced Paediatric Lift Support, the European This debate highlights the need for revisiting the national policy
Resuscitation Council Guidelines, or the American Heart Associa- on certification of death, which includes rare and challenging scenar-
tion Guideline suggests the use of bedside echo in pediatric ios like the one encountered in this case. Furthermore, as mentioned
cardiac arrest.9,10 in previous publications on the same topic, consideration should be
The physiological theories surrounding autoresuscitation vary given to how these cases may impact on organ donation protocols.6
with no universally accepted mechanism. Adult physicians postu-
late a role for hyperkalemia, myocardial stunning postinfarction,
or hyperventilation. For those cases involving children, hyperven-
tilation appears to be the most consistent etiology proposed. The REFERENCES
hyperventilation hypothesis is based on a degree of autopositive 1. Adhiyaman V, Adhiyaman S, Sundaram R. The Lazarus Phenomenon.
end-expiratory pressure, as a result of vigorous ventilation during J R Soc Med. 2007;100:552–557.
CPR. The resulting increase in intrathoracic pressure compresses 2. Ballesteros PS, Aedo IF, Palomino SL. Spontaneous return of circulation
the vena cava and other large thoracic vessels, reducing venous re- after termination of cardiopulmonary resuscitation maneuvers: a systematic
turn, and thus cardiac output. This may also impact the distribu- review of cases of Lazarus phenomenon. Emergencias. 2014;26:307–316.
tion and thus the effect of resuscitation drugs. When CPR is
3. Hornby L, Dhanani S, Shemie SD. Update of a systematic review of
terminated, the reduction in intrathoracic pressure allows venous
autoresuscitation after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e268–e272.
return and potentially ROSC.
The most profound question this case raises surrounds the 4. Cummings BM, Noviski N. Autoresuscitation in a child: the young
definition of death. There is no internationally accepted diagnosis Lazarus. Resuscitation. 2011;82:134.
of death. In the United Kingdom, guidance was issued in 2008 by 5. Duff JP, Joffe AR, Sevcik W, et al. Autoresuscitation after pediatric cardiac
the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges.11 In this document, arrest: is hyperventilation a cause? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:208–209.
death is defined as “the irreversible loss of those essential charac- 6. Tretter JT, Radunsky GS, Rogers DJ, et al. A pediatric case of
teristics which are necessary to the existence of a living human autoresuscitation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015;31:138–139.
person and, thus, the definition of death should be regarded as the 7. Doniger SJ. Bedside emergency cardiac ultrasound in children. Journal
irreversible loss of the capacity for consciousness, combined with of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock. 2010;3:282–291.
irreversible loss of the capacity to breathe.”
8. Marin JR, Abo AM, Arroyo AC, et al. Pediatric emergency medicine
The document addresses many key principles surrounding
point-of-care ultrasound: summary of the evidence. Crit Ultrasound J.
the process of death. 2016;8:16.
It acknowledges that, although there is no legal definition of
death, the courts have adopted the brain-stem death criteria into 9. Maconochie IK, Bingham R, Eich C, et al. European Resuscitation Council
law. In the case of cardiopulmonary arrest, death can be confirmed Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Paediatric life support. Resuscitation.
2015;95:223–248.
if irreversible cessation of neurological (pupillary), cardiac, and
respiratory activity has occurred. 10. Atkins DL, Berger S, Duff JP, et al. Part 11: Pediatric Basic Life Support
The guidelines further state that the individual should be ob- and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart
served by the person responsible for confirming death for a mini- Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
mum of 5 minutes to establish that irreversible cardiorespiratory Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 suppl 2):
arrest has occurred, although it fails to clarify the manner in which S519–S525, originally published October 14, 2015.
the patient is observed. If there is a spontaneous return of a pulse 11. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. A Code of Practice for the Diagnosis
or respiratory effort, a further 5-minute period of observation and Confirmation of Death. Published Online on October 8, 2010.
should occur. It is unclear from the passage whether this 5-minute Available at: http://aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Code_
period is only for observation or active resuscitation. After a further Practice_Confirmation_Diagnosis_Death_1008-4.pdf. Accessed
5-minute period of cardiopulmonary arrest, the patient should be February 2018.
reassessed for pupillary response, corneal reflex, and response 12. Maleck WH, Piper SN, Triem J, et al. Unexpected return of spontaneous
to supraorbital pain. Death is then confirmed if all remain absent. circulation after cessation of resuscitation (Lazarus phenomenon).
Other guidelines recommend a 10-minute period before reassess- Resuscitation. 1998;39:125–128.
ment and confirmation of death.1,12,13 13. Kuisma M, Salo A, Puolakka J, et al. Delayed return of spontaneous
From the definition of death noted previously, our patient circulation (the Lazarus phenomenon) after cessation of out-of-hospital
may have met the legal criteria to be certified as dead. However, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2017;118:107–111.
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e211
UnBeelievable
A Case of Pediatric Myocarditis After Insect Envenomation
Simon Chi, DO and Jacqueline Le, MD
FIGURE 1. Initial ECG obtained at 1025 hours, demonstrating sinus tachycardia and ST segment elevation in the anterolateral and inferior
leads, diffuse PR segment depression, PR segment elevation in lead aVR, and ST segment depression in lead V1.
e212 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
FIGURE 2. Subsequent ECG obtained at 1207 hours, demonstrating new absence of ST segment depression in lead V1, and new abnormality
of ST segment elevation in V2.
acetaminophen for pain control. Laboratory data revealed ele- Our patient developed acute myocarditis after a bee sting.
vated troponin of 5.39 ng/mL, creatine kinase MB isoenzyme of The pathophysiology behind insect envenomation and myocar-
21.6 ng/mL, and myoglobin of 207.5 ng/mL. Erythrocyte sedi- ditis is unclear.3 Several sources hypothesize cardiotoxicity
mentation rate was 2 mm/h and C-reactive protein was elevated from envenomation, Kounis syndrome (cardiovascular event
at 29.2 mg/L. Complete blood count showed the following: white from allergy or anaphylaxis), Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, or
blood cell count, 16.1 109/L; hemoglobin, 15.6 g/L; hematocrit, any combination of these events. 4–6 A literature search for
46.6%; and platelets, 256 109/L. Basic metabolic panel and instances of cardiac events after insect envenomation yielded
urine drug screen was unremarkable. Chest radiography was nor- only adult cases of cardiac pathology after envenomation, in-
mal without cardiomegaly. A repeat ECG performed 90 minutes cluding type I atrioventricular block, myopericarditis, and
later was similar to the first, except that the ST segment depres- myocardial infarction.3–5,7–9 The most comparable cases reported
sion in lead V1 was no longer present and new ST segment eleva- in the pediatric population were not of insect envenomation but
tion was seen in lead V2 (Fig. 2). Our overall concern for possible involved arachnid envenomation and M. pneumoniae
acute myopericarditis prompted us to transfer the patient to a infection.6,10–12 Although our patient had a positive Mycoplamsa
tertiary care pediatric facility for admission and further evaluation pneumoniae antibody screen, he did not acutely present with any
and treatment. infectious complaints.
The patient underwent a 5-day hospital course. His echo-
cardiogram showed mild left ventricular dilatation and dimin- CONCLUSIONS
ished left ventricular ejection fraction (50%) and systolic function This is the first reported pediatric case of insect envenom-
(26%). Subsequent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging dem- ation triggering subsequent cardiac pathology. The patient's
onstrated mild myocardial edema involving the apical segments clinical presentation and results of his diagnostic studies were
with corresponding hyperemia, suggestive of acute myocarditis. consistent with acute myocarditis. Given the close proximity
Infectious work-up revealed positive titers for Mycoplasma in time of the bee sting to the presenting chest pain, we believe
pneumoniae IgM and IgG antibodies. He was started on a that the envenomation was the key inciting event for his
milrinone infusion and intravenous immunoglobulin. His chest acute myocarditis.
pain resolved shortly after admission, and he was eventually
discharged on a medication regimen of azithromycin, carve-
REFERENCES
dilol, spironolactone, enalapril, aspirin, and ibuprofen.
1. Ghelani SJ, Spaeder MC, Pastor W, et al. Demographics, trends, and
outcomes in pediatric acute myocarditis in the United States, 2006 to 2011.
DISCUSSION Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:622–627.
Myocarditis is a rare condition in the pediatric population.1 2. Canter CE, Simpson KE. Diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis in
The most common causes of myocarditis are infectious in etiology children in the current era. Circulation. 2014;129:115–128.
and include coxsackie B, adenovirus, influenza, hepatitis B virus, 3. Vishwanath P, Adhikari D, Akila P, et al. Myocarditis and mobitz type I
β-hemolytic streptococcus, M. pneumoniae, mumps, cytomegalo- heart block following wasp sting. Internet J Cardiol. 2009;8.
virus, Toxoplasma, Chagas disease, Trichinella, Corynebacterium 4. Aminiahidashti H, Laali A, Samakoosh AK, et al. Myocardial infarction
diphtheriae, and Lyme disease.2 Drug etiologies include doxoru- following a bee sting: a case report of Kounis syndrome. Ann Card
bicin and cocaine. Anaesth. 2016;19:375–378.
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e213
5. Scherbak D, Lazkani M, Sparacino N, et al. Kounis syndrome: a stinging 9. Yang HP, Chen FC, Chen CC, et al. Manifestations mimicking acute
case of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24: myocardial infarction after honeybee sting. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2009;25:31–35.
e48–e50. 10. Formosa GM, Bailey M, Barbara C, et al. Mycoplasma pneumonia – an
6. Yaman M, Mete T, Ozer I, et al. Reversible myocarditis and pericarditis unusual cause of acute myocarditis in childhood. Images Paediatr Cardiol.
after black widow spider bite or Kounis syndrome? Case Rep Cardiol. 2006;8:7–10.
2015;2015:768089. 11. Park IH, Choi DY, Oh YK, et al. A case of acute myopericarditis associated
7. Dinamithra NP, Sivansuthan S. Giant Asian honeybee stings induced acute with Mycoplasma pneumonia infection in a child. Korean Circ J. 2012;42:
myocarditis: a case report. Anuradhapura Medical Journal. 2013;7:12–15. 709–713.
8. Puvanalingam A, Karpagam P, Sundar C, et al. Myocardial infarction 12. Agarwala BN, Ruschhaupt DG. Complete heart block from mycoplasma
following bee sting. J Assoc Physicians India. 2014;62:738–740. pneumonia infection. Pediatr Cardiol. 1991;12:233–236.
e214 www.pec-online.com © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
abnormalities. In the first years of life, she was diagnosed with relative
Abstract: We report a case of an uncommon sacrococcygeal anomaly in a anal stenosis, which was treated with Hegar dilators until she was
healthy girl initially presenting to the emergency department with coccygodynia 3 years old without improvement. Percentiles of weight and height
and a past history of longstanding constipation. The clinical evolution was were stable in p25-p50 during infancy. Afterward, the diagnosis of
satisfactory once the bony anomaly was removed (coccygectomy). This functional constipation was established according to the Roma III
unusual case exemplifies the importance of the medical history and phys- criteria, as the patient reported 3 defecations per week, straining
ical examination to make an accurate diagnosis. An inadequate interven- in >25% of defecations, hard stools in >25% of defecations, sensa-
tion may result in persistent pain, worsening longstanding constipation, tion of anorectal obstruction in >25% of defecations, and some ep-
and psychosocial and medical consequences. isodes of mild rectal bleeding.
Key Words: coccygodynia, sacrococcygeal anomaly, coccygectomy, Physical examination revealed a well-appearing girl with nor-
organic constipation mal vital constants, a weight of 50 kg (p42), and a height of 1.61 m
(p65). Her abdomen was soft, nondistended, with palpable stool.
(Pediatr Emer Care 2021;37: e215–e217)
She referred pain when coccyx was examined, but there were no
local skin lesions. The digital anorectal examination revealed a
C occygodynia is defined as the presence of pain in the coccyx.
It is also referred to as coccydynia or tailbone pain. It exacer-
bates with any increase of pressure, such as defecation, sexual ac-
slightly patulous rectum full of stool with an adequate anal tone
and the coccyx clearly protruding in the posterior wall just above
dentate line. No abdominal or pelvis masses were palpable, and no
tivity, sitting position, or transitioning from sitting to standing.
anorectal malformations were found.
The etiology is broad, with the most common causes being related
Anteroposterior and lateral sacrococcygeal radiographs were
to trauma. Rare abnormalities of the sacrum and coccyx may ex-
obtained, showing an angular coccyx of almost 90 degrees (Fig. 1).
plain some cases of coccygodynia.1–3
Considering this abnormality, the patient was referred to the
Constipation represents a common problem throughout child-
pediatric surgery department. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
hood and a frequent symptom in those visiting the emergency depart-
was performed to rule out any other abnormalities. The MRI showed
ment (ED).4–6 Although functional constipation represents more than
an anterior curvature of the fifth sacrum vertebra and confirmed an
95% of cases, organic causes like endocrine and metabolic diseases,
angle of almost 90 degrees in the first coccygeal vertebra. The rest
neurologic disorders, or anorectal or anatomic anomalies must be
of vertebrae were normal. Presacral or pelvic masses were not present
recognized by ED pediatricians. A focused history and a physical
(Fig. 2).
examination are essential at the first evaluation.7–10
The patient was admitted for schedule surgery, and the coc-
We describe a case of a 13-year-old girl who presented to the
cygeal bone was removed without incidents (coccygectomy).
ED with coccygodynia and a past history of longstanding constipa-
After a follow-up period of 1½ year, she referred a complete
tion. Imaging examinations revealed a sacrococcygeal anomaly.
resolution of coccygodynia and constipation (she reported a bowel
The patient was referred to the department of pediatric surgery,
habit of 1–2 soft stools daily).
and she experienced a noticeable improvement after coccygectomy.
CASE DISCUSSION
A 13-year-old girl presented to the ED with 7-day history of This case illustrates how a rare sacrococcygeal anomaly may
worsening coccygodynia. She referred pain since she was 11 years be responsible of coccygodynia and may explain a longstanding
old, that had got much worse during the last week. She reported in- constipation. Similar cases have not been reported in the literature.
creased pain with defecation and in the seated position. No traumatic It also exemplifies the fact that a focused history and an exhaus-
antecedent was referred. She denied fever or urinary infections. tive physical examination remain key for the accurate diagnosis.
Her past medical history included a delayed passage of meco- Our patient presented to the ED with two symptoms: first, a
nium and a history of chronic constipation treated by her pediatrician, worsening coccygodynia, which increased with defecation and in
the gastroenterology department, and the pediatric surgery department. the seated position, and second, a persistent constipation despite
She was treated with different laxatives with partial improvement dur- different treatments. The digital anorectal examination revealed a
ing her childhood. Initially, a contrast enema was performed with no coccyx clearly protruding in the posterior wall. Clinical suspicion
of a bony abnormality was essential to stablish the final diagnosis.
In the literature, several authors have reported sacrococcygeal
From the *Pediatric Emergency Department, †Pediatric Department of Radi-
ology, and ‡Department of Pediatric Surgery, La Paz University Hospital,
anomalies responsible for coccygodynia, such as sacrococcygeal
Madrid, Spain. ribs, human pseudotails, or excessive curvature of the coccyx.11–13
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Some of them could be explained by failure of formation or seg-
Reprints: Paula García Sánchez, MD, Pediatric Emergency Department, La Paz mentation of coccygeal vertebrae.12
University Hospital, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
(e‐mail: paula.garsa@gmail.com).
Referred to the configuration of the coccyx, Postacchini and
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Massobrio14 classified the coccygeal bone in 4 types, being types
ISSN: 0749-5161 II to IV more prone to become painful:
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com e215
e216 www.pec-online.com © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
12. Hamoud K, Abbas J. A tale of pseudo tail. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;19: 16. Vargas-González R, Paniagua Morgan F, Victoria G, et al. Currarino
E1281–E1284. syndrome. A rare cause of severe constipation. Case report and literature
13. Turk CC, Kara NN, Bacanli A. The human tail: a simple skin appendage or review. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2008;73:80–84.
cutaneous stigma of an anomaly? Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26:140–145. 17. Calleja Aguayo E, Estors Sastre B, Bragagnini Rodríguez P, et al. Currarino
14. Postacchini F, Massobrio M. Idiopathic coccygodynia. Analysis of triad: different forms of presentation. Cir Pediatr. 2012;25:155–158.
fifty-one operative cases and a radiographic study of the normal coccyx. 18. Phipps KD, Wrogemann J, El-Matary W. A rare cause of chronic
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:1116–1124. constipation. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1090–1091.
15. Duru S, Karabagli H, Turkoglu E, et al. Currarino syndrome: report of five 19. Tobias N, Mason D, Lutkenhoff M, et al. Management principles of organic
consecutive patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;30:547–552. causes of childhood constipation. J Pediatr Health Care. 2008;22:12–23.
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com e217
e218 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021
“Second Wave” of and epidemiological characteristics of all Daniel Mata Zubillaga, MD, PhD
patients (Table 1). Department of Paediatrics. Hospital Vital
COVID-19 Pandemic During the “second wave,” coincid- Álvarez Buylla. Servicio de Salud de
Admittance on Pediatric ing with the onset of the state of alarm, Principado de Asturias, Mieres del Camino
Emergency Department of a we have observed a significant decrease Av. del Camino, 1B, 33619 Santullano
in the use of the pediatric emergency de- Asturias, Spain
Regional Hospital From North partment by the population, as in the first dmatzub@yahoo.es
of Spain During State of Alarm half of the year. This decrease has been
progressively accentuated during the pre- Lara Gloria González García, MD
vious weeks. The distribution of patients Cristina García Aparicio, MD
by sex and age has been similar. The Ana Elisa Laso Alonso, MD
greatest decrease in incidence was observed Silvia Rodríguez Manchón, MD
To the Editors: in infectious processes and their complica- Sara Corral Hospital, MD
FIGURE 1. Patients admitted on pediatric emergency department during state of alarm (October 25, 2020 to November 8, 2020).
Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 37, Number 4, April 2021 www.pec-online.com e219
TABLE 1. Clinical Characteristics of the Patients During the State of Alarm (October 25, 2020 to November 8, 2020)
Year 2020 (October 25, 2020 Year 2019 (October 25, 2020 Statistical
to November 8, 2020) to November 8, 2020) Significance, P
n 39 84
Median age in months (range) 52 (2–166) 47 (0–162)
Age group
<1 y, n (%) 12 (30.8%) 14 (16.7%)
1–2 y, n (%) 6 (15.4%) 15 (17.9%)
2–3 y, n (%) 6 (15.4%) 14 (16.7%)
3–6 y, n (%) 3 (7.7%) 24 (28.6%)
6–14 y, n (%) 12 (30.8%) 17 (20.2%)
Male sex, n (%) 24 (61.5%) 47 (56.0%)
Duration of symptoms: median, h 70 ± 146 45 ± 91
Diagnosis
Upper respiratory infections, n(%) 6 (15.4%) 21 (25.0%)
Skin lesions, n (%) 6 (15.4%) 3 (3.6%)
Abdominal pain, n (%) 7 (17.9%) 8 (9.5%)
Febrile syndrome, n(%) 10 (25.6%) 3 (3.6%)
Traumatic head injuries, n (%) 3 (7.7%) 3 (3.6%)
Pneumonia, n (%) 0 1 (1.2%)
Acute gastroenteritis, n (%) 0 15 (17.9%)
Asthma/bronchiolitis, n (%) 2 (5.1%) 4 (4.8%)
Urinary tract infections, n (%) 0 1 (1.2%)
Streptococcal tonsillitis/otitis media, n (%) 1 (2.6%) 9 (10.7%)
Others 4 (10.2%) 16 (19.0%)
COVID-19 in health records
Suspected COVID-19 infection, n (%) 21 (53.9%)
Confirmed cases COVID-19 (positive PCR), n (%) 1 (2.6%)
Treatment
Antibiotic prescription, n (%) 4 (10.3%) 7 (8.3%)
Oral corticosteroids, n (%) 3 (7.7%) 6 (7.1%)
Complementary tests, n (%)
Chest x-ray, n (%) 0 2 (2.4%)
Blood analysis, n (%) 9 (23.1%) 7 (8.4%)
Urine analysis, n (%) 7 (17.9%) 5 (6.0%)
Ultrasound, n (%) 3 (7.7%) 1 (1.2%)
Oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal swabs for respiratory virus 4 (10.2%) 1 (1.2%)
testing
Discharge/follow-up
Hospital admission, n (%) 6 (15.4%) 6 (7.1%)
Return within 15 d, n(%) 3 (7.7%) 1 (1.2%)
Primary care follow-up, n (%) 18 (46.2%) 16 (19.0%) 0.002
Telephone follow-up, n (%) 13 (76.5%) 0 <0.0001
PCR indicates polymerase chain reaction.
e220 www.pec-online.com © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.