Professional Documents
Culture Documents
o FRAMING SYSTEM
• TENSION MEMBERS
• COMPRESSION MEMBERS
o STEEL TRUSS DESIGN
o STEEL CONNECTIONS
• STEEL PLATES AND BOLTS
o MODERN ARCHITECTURAL STEEL DESIGN AND CONNECTIONS
o TECHNICAL DESIGN OF STEEL 56
FRAMING SYSTEM
TENSION MEMBERS
Tension members may consist of round bars, wire cables, plates, and rolled sections. End
connections may consist of threaded ends, eyebars, pinned, (a) bolted, and (b) welded
connections.
The limiting states for the tensile members and the connecting elements are controlled by the
following modes:
1. Tensile strength
2. Shear strength of connection
3. Block shear strength of connection along the shear/tension failure path
Theoretically, the tension member transmitting a direct tension between two points in a structure
is the simplest and most efficient structural element. In many cases this efficiency is seriously
impaired by the end connections required to join tension members to other members in the
structure.
57
FRAMING SYSTEM
EYE BAR
PIN CONNECTED
58
FRAMING SYSTEM
60
FRAMING SYSTEM
61
FRAMING SYSTEM
Screwed ends and turnbuckles can be used to adjust lengths of bars and cables after they are in place.
Bracing members fabricated from rolled sections should be installed and properly tightened before other
connections and column base plates are bolted up, to bring the structure into line and square. Bracing
members are usually specified slightly shorter than the exact length to avoid sagging and allow them to be
immediately effective.
62
FRAMING SYSTEM
COMPRESSION MEMBERS
A compression member is a structural element that supports loads applied along its longitudinal
axis. Axially loaded members are compression members that are nominally free from applied
bendingg moments
1. Local instability: If the parts (elements) comprising a column are relatively very thin, a localized
buckling or winkling of one or more of these elements may occur prior to the instability of the entire
column. Based on the ratio of width to thickness of the element, a section is classified as a slender or a
non-slender section for the purpose of local instability.
2. Overall instability: Instead of an individual element getting winkled, the entire column may bend or
buckle lengthwise under the action of the axial compression force. This can occur in three different
ways.
64
FRAMING SYSTEM
65
FRAMING SYSTEM
TRUSSES
The most common use of trusses in
buildings is to provide support to
roofs, floors and such internal loading
as services and suspended ceilings.
There are many types and forms of
trusses; some of the most widely used.
The type of truss adopted in design is
governed by architectural and client
requirements, varied in detail by
dimensional and economic factors. A
structural steel grid system simply
establishes the location of the structural
steel columns so that beam spans will
not be uneconomically long and steel 66
(a) Pratt – pitched, (b) Howe, (c) Fink, (d) mansard,
fabrication costs will be reasonable. (e) Pratt – flat, (f) Warren, (g) modified Warren, (h) saw-tooth
FRAMING SYSTEM
TRUSS - GUIDANCE ON OVER-ALL CONCEPT.
For pitched-roof trusses such as the Pratt, Howe or Fink, Fig. (a), (b) and (c), the most economical span-to-depth
ratio (at apex) is between 4 and 5, with a span range of 6m to 12m, the Fink truss being the most economical at
the higher end of the span range. Spans of up to 15 m are possible but the unusable roof space becomes excessive
and increases the running costs of the building. In such circumstances the span-to-depth ratio may be increased to
about 6 to 7, the additional steel weight (increase in initial capital expenditure) being offset by the long-term
savings in the running costs.
For spans of between 15m and 30m, the mansard truss, Fig. (d), reduces the unusable roof space but retains the
pitched appearance and offers an economic structure at span-to-depth ratios of about 7 to 8.
The parallel (or near parallel) chord trusses (also known as lattice girders) such as the Pratt or Warren, Fig. (e)
and (f), have an economic span range of between 6m and 50m, with a span-to-depth ratio of between 15 and 25
depending on the intensity of the applied loads. For the top end of the span range the bay width should be such
that the web members are inclined at approximately 50° or slightly steeper. For long, deep trusses the bay widths
become too large and are often subdivided with secondary web members.
For roof trusses the web member intersection points with the chords should ideally coincide with the secondary
transverse roof members (purlins). In practice this is not often the case for economic truss member arrangements,
thus resulting in the supporting chord being subject to local bending stresses.
The most economical spacing for roof trusses is a function of the span and load intensity and to a lesser extent 67
the span and spacing of the purlins, but as a general rule the spacing should be between 1/4 and 1/5 of the span,
which results in a spacing of between 4m and 10 m for the economic range of truss spans.
FRAMING SYSTEM
TRUSS DESIGN PRINCIPLE.
FRAMING SYSTEM
69
FRAMING SYSTEM
FRAMING SYSTEM
72
FRAMING SYSTEM
STEEL CONNECTIONS
In general the cost of the design, fabrication and erection of the structural frame in a steel framed
building is approximately 30% of the total cost of construction. Of these three items, fabrication and
erection account for approximately 67%. Any savings in the fabrication and erection costs can
significantly reduce the overall cost of construction. The majority of the fabrication costs are
absorbed by the connections, and the choice of connection also has a significant influence on the
speed, ease, and, therefore, the cost of erection. It is evident that the potential for reducing the cost
of steel construction lies in the suitable choice of the beam-to-column and beam-to-beam
connections. Indeed, because of the repetitive nature of connections, even small material and labour
savings in one connection can have an important effect on the overall economy of the building.
73
FRAMING SYSTEM
Care should also be taken to ensure that the assumptions made for the design of the various
elements of the connection are compatible. For example, in a cover plate splice, sharing the load
between ordinary bolts (in shear and tension) and a fillet weld is not acceptable because the
deformation characteristics of ordinary bolts and fillet welds are incompatible. The fillet welds are
stiff compared with the bolts in clearance holes, and as the load is applied the welds will initially
carry most of the load. Then due to their limited ductility, the fillet welds will break before the
bolts can take up their share of the load.
74
FRAMING SYSTEM
Based on the mode of load transfer, the connections are categorized as:
• Simple or axially loaded connection when the resultant of the applied forces passes through the
center of gravity of the connection.
• Eccentrically loaded connection when the line of action of the resultant of the forces does not
pass through the center of gravity of the connection
75
FRAMING SYSTEM
FRAMING SYSTEM
TYPES OF CONNECTORS
The connectors (bolts or welds) are subjected to
the following types of forces (and stresses).
77
FRAMING SYSTEM
TYPES OF CONNECTORS
78
FRAMING SYSTEM
STEEL CONNECTIONS – DESIGN PRINCIPLE
Flexible end-plates
Typical flexible end-plate connections about the major and minor axis of a column are shown. These
connections consist of a single plate fillet welded to the end of the beam and site bolted to a supporting
column.
This connection is relatively inexpensive but has the disadvantage that there is no room for site
adjustment. Overall beam lengths need to be fabricated within tight limits although packs can be used 80
to compensate for fabrication and erection tolerances. The end-plate is often detailed to extend to the
full depth of the beam but there is no need to weld the end-plate to the flanges of the beam.
FRAMING SYSTEM
STEEL CONNECTIONS – DESIGN PRINCIPLE
Fin plates
This type of connection is primarily used to transfer beam end reactions and is
economical to fabricate and simple to erect. There is clearance between the ends of
the supported beam and the supporting column, thus ensuring an easy fit. Figures
show a typical bolted fin plate connection to the major and minor axes of a column 81
respectively. These connections comprise a single plate with either pre-punched or
pre-drilled holes that is shop welded to the supporting column flange or web.
FRAMING SYSTEM
STEEL CONNECTIONS – DESIGN PRINCIPLE
FRAMING SYSTEM
83
Illustration:
RSHM-QM1166-L200 - STRUC
FRAMING SYSTEM
FRAMING
AMING SYSTEM
85
PLAN VIEW ELEVATION VIEW
Illustration:
RSHM-QM1166-L200 - STRUC
STANDARD STRUCTURAL BEAM SYMBOLS
FRAMING SYSTEM
ELEVATION VIEW
86
STANDARD STRUCTURAL
COLUMN SYMBOLS
FRAMING SYSTEM
Beam Symbols.
The double-line elevation views under each symbol show that the beams could either be bolted to a
steel cap plate on top of the column or fastened to the column flanges directly with clip angle con-
nections. In either case, the single-line representation would be the same, so a detail would be
required.
A very important point to notice is that the single heavy lines representing the center lines of the
beams stop short of touching the column. On most structural steel framing plans, the open distance
between the end of the beam and the column to which it connects will be approximately 1/16".
87
STANDARD
STAN
STANDA
DARD
RD S
STRUCTURAL
TRUC
TRUCTU
TURA
RAL
L ST
STEE
STEEL
EEL
L
CONNECTION SYMBOLS
FRAMING SYS
YSTEM
STE
T M
FRAMING SYSTEM
Column Symbols.
Beams framing into structural pipe
or tube columns are also denoted
by symbols on framing plans. But
once again, the symbol does not
clearly indicate the type of
connection desired. The figure
illustrates how symbols of W-
shape beams connecting to pipe or
tube columns might indicate that
the beams could fasten either to a
column cap plate or to a shear
plate
FRAMING SYSTEM
FRAMING SYSTEM
FRAMING SYSTEM
COLUMN TO CONCRETE
ELEMENT CONNECTIONS
95