Writing coursework, especially on a complex topic like Geography River Coursework Analysis, can

be a challenging task for many students. It requires a deep understanding of the subject matter,
strong research skills, critical analysis, and the ability to articulate findings coherently. Here are some
reasons why writing coursework can be difficult:

1. In-depth Research: Geography coursework often demands thorough research, including data
collection, analysis, and interpretation. Gathering relevant information about river systems
and their geographical features can be time-consuming and challenging.
2. Analytical Skills: Interpreting data and drawing meaningful conclusions requires strong
analytical skills. Students need to demonstrate a clear understanding of the geographical
processes involved in river systems and their impact on the environment.
3. Writing Skills: Articulating thoughts and findings in a well-structured and coherent manner
is crucial. This includes presenting arguments, supporting them with evidence, and
maintaining a logical flow throughout the coursework.
4. Time Management: Balancing coursework with other academic and personal commitments
can be tough. Meeting deadlines and managing time effectively to conduct research and write
can be a significant challenge.

For those finding it difficult to cope with these challenges, seeking assistance from professional
writing services like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ could be a viable option. These services often have
experienced writers with expertise in various subjects, including Geography. They can provide well-
researched and customized coursework, helping students meet their academic requirements.

However, it's important for students to approach such services cautiously. They should ensure the
legitimacy and reputation of the service, and use any external assistance as a supplement to their
own learning rather than a replacement for it.

In conclusion, while writing a Geography River Coursework Analysis can be difficult, seeking help
from reputable sources like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ may offer valuable support for those who need
it. Nevertheless, it's essential for students to approach such services responsibly and maintain
academic integrity throughout the process.
I would make if I were going to undertake this river study again. We could have improved this by
doing pedestrian counts in time slots.for example form 9-10, 11-12 and so on. In this section I will
be analysing my results to see if my hypothesis were correct and. Flow Rate (s) 3 100 45.7 17.06 15.9
22.69 18.97 43.99 100. This resource may be used as an example, however, it should NOT be copied
and resubmitted for external examination. The beaker is not very precise, it does not measure to a
great deal of detail, and more than one small pebble can accidentally be placed in the beaker. The
plot of 0.572 above gives a significance level of under 5% which tells us that it is. At some sites we
were very near to confluences and this could have affected our. Predicted that the core would have
more litter than the frame, our environmental surveys showed this. The width of the river starts to
increase as we go from site1to site 4 by 2.95m. At site. East of the centre of Epping Forest is
Loughton Brook, which runs through Loughton after leaving Epping Forest. Flow Rate (s) 3 100
45.7 17.06 15.9 22.69 18.97 43.99 100. In the higher profile of the river mainly vertical erosiontakes
place. It was important that we all counted pedestrians at the same time. To improve this method I
feel that we could have just worked out the volume of the. At the first 3 sites when we were
measuring the velocity, using a hydroprop and an. Limestone’s permeability meant that water in the
channel was going to percolate. A result of this was that Humic acid was formed and. One of these
changes is that I would have taken ten depth readings at each site rather. A further technique is now
required to test the significance of the relationship. The. As you can see from the table above, this
hypothesis. As the River Holford flows along its course, tributaries. For this hypothesis I believe that
my methods were very good, and not much could be done to improve them. Site’s 6 cross sectional
area was 0.23142 m2 which was an increase from the last site. There was a lack of rain before we
went on this field trip which meant that the river in. My evaluation for measuring cross-section area
is shown on page.. This shows all of the problems with my methods, and how they could have been
fixed, and they all are applicable here. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for
our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to
let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Hypothesis 3 was rejectedwhen it came to the
data being analysed using Spearman’s. During our four day field trip we stayed in a mansion called
Nettlecombe Court which. We chose to sample eight sites along the River Holford’s course because
this would.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?1.00 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later ?1.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 23
December 2020 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest GCSE and A-Level Revision's Shop Not the right resource.
National Park and is set in a valley just north of the Brendon Hills. This would have highlighted any
issues which would later occur. The river increased in depth at site 2 where it was 0.14m. We have
shown this in all the investigations we carried out. Width from source to mouth along the River
Holford (m). If I could, I would collect more many more pebbles and measured them and then the
accuracy of my results would be increased. Any tributaries flowing into the River Bourne would
have a profound affect on our results, as the river does not carry much. This was measured by timing
how long it took for an orange to travel 10 metres downstream. A further technique is now required
to test the significance of the relationship. The. Spearman’s rank technique is a statistical test which
will be used for each hypothesis. This was measured by putting a metal chain on the river bed, and
measuring its length which was in contact with the perimeter of the river (its banks and bed only). A
result of this was that Humic acid was formed and. This is the equation to work out Spearman’s
Rank Correlation. This could help us to find out the boundaries between the core and frame, the
larger shops would be in the frame and smaller shops, restaurants etc would be in the frame. The
banks erode downstream through hydraulic action and the load increases; this would suggest that the
water width would increase as well because of the load eroding away at the banks allowing even
greater corrasion to occur. We started the stopwatch as soon as the cork was just beside the 1 metre
ruler at the beginning of it. There are three types of sampling methods which could have been used
on this river. My first hypothesis was that the width of the channel would increase as you went. The
depth stayed the same at readings 1 and 2 and was 0.105m. It then increased. Site 4 was near an
urban area, (Holford), which meant that there was concrete and. At site 7 the cross sectional area was
0.219 m2 which was a decrease from site 6.The. This would have ensured that the sites I had chosen
typified that stretch of river. At site 2 the cross sectional area was 0.28035 m2 which was higher than
at the. There are three types of sampling methods which could have been used on this river. PLEASE
NOTE: material written by me and in my own words, except for quotations from published and
unpublished sources which are clearly indicated and acknowledged as such. My evaluation for
velocity is on page., and my evaluation for cross-section area is on page.. The reasons for these
evaluations are all applicable to this one. In the lower course of the river there is lateral erosionwhich.
Clast Size (cm) 2 12.5 11.2 10.7 5.4 11.2 8.4 8.2 8.1. These will be the width of the river channel, the
average depth.
Depth (m) 1 0.015 0.045 0.037 0.105 0.105 0.055 0.043 0.092. Spearman’s Rank is a statistical
technique which is used to see if there is a correlation. These all led me into producing a good piece
of coursework. There seems to be a pattern that follows for the M depth in all 3 sites as it increases at
all 3 sites. I have chosen to represent the depth of the river as a bar chart because it is very easy. The
gradient of the river starts to decrease rapidly as you go from site1 to site 2. Then. However, at site
4, the width decreased by 1.38m from the previous site. At site 5 the cross sectional area was 0.18216
m2 which was lower than the previous. The depth increases until plot 3, until plot 4 where there is a
decrease. The width. The water vapour produced from transpiration advances the formation of
clouds and the process of precipitation. There were many problems that we encountered on our river
study. Hypothesis 2- The depth of the river will increase as you go from source to mouth. Flow Rate
(s) 3 100 45.7 17.06 15.9 22.69 18.97 43.99 100. The fact that we only took 15 pebbles from each
site most probably was not enough and also maybe the fact that I only did the graph for the means
which doesn’t show the individual outliers for the pebble size. Also, when the pebbles are very small,
this method is crude. The orange was difficult to keep in the middle of the river. The velocity was
measured using a hydroprop and an impeller. The picking up of the bedload was not random enough,
and I only selected the bedload which was nearest to the bank, this was therefore the easiest to
access. Limestone is well jointed which means that the rock has vertical and horizontal. Spearman’s
Rank correlation must be undertaken to see the strength of this. We were undertaking this study in
the autumn and so there were many rotting leaves. The depth then increased until plot 5, (where the
water was at its deepest), and then. This is a summary table showing if my hypotheses were accepted
visually, by looking. An investigation into how physical channel characteristics. Clast Shape - Enter
the number of each shape found at each site. Below is how we found r2 using the Spearman’s rank
equation. In my introduction I will be talking about where in the UK the River Holford is.
Accessibility of land was a human limitation because part of the river was blocked. I could have
improved these methods, by using a metal tape measure instead of the plastic one, which would not
have bent in the wind. You would also be able to see if the new depth readings followed the same
trends as.
We used the cailleux roundness index chart and a ruler when measuring the clast size. As you can see
from the table above, this hypothesis. However, at site 4, the width decreased by 1.38m from the
previous site. Eclow80 a year ago report 5 Really useful, thank you. It was originally built with the
intentions of it being a. Not a lot could have been done to improve the methods used to measure the
depth of the river. There are three types of sampling methods which could have been used on this
river. Near the mouth of the River Holford, (the Bristol Channel), we expected the river to. We had
some trouble identifying which brand or type some shops were as many were in-between two or
more categories. One reason why the depth increased at some sites and then decreased at others was.
In this section I will be seeing if my hypotheses were correct overall using data from. The depth
increases until plot 4 where it is 0.2 and. It was hard to get an exact depth reading because the water
was always moving. This. One of these changes is that I would have taken ten depth readings at each
site rather. Being an urban river is a problem, because the bedload could be affected by rubbish
dumped into the river (I saw a lot of rubbish in the river, such as computers, cables, paperwork and
even needles) and also affect results on river depth and silt depth. Our gradient data was mostly
secondary data because we did not physically take all of. This is the Spearman’s Rank formula
written in mathematical notation. In the lower course of the river there is lateral erosionwhich. In my
introduction I will be talking about where in the UK the River Holford is. The river increased in
depth at site 2 where it was 0.14m. The last reading that we had to take at each site was the Gradient.
Overall this study along the River Holford was highly successful in that we collected. As the River
Holford flows along its course, tributaries. This is due to the fact that there will be less friction.
Noise was obvious because if there are more people then there will be more noise. Graphs to show
the depth of the river along all eight sites. Our customer service team will review your report and will
be in touch. ?1.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?1.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY
NOW Save for later Last updated 23 December 2020 Share this Share through email Share through
twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest GCSE and A-Level
Revision's Shop Not the right resource. In this section I shall be describing the different sites at
which we collectedour. Niranjan Chavan Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research,
International FDP on. During our four day field trip we stayed in a mansion called Nettlecombe
Court which.
It will be sent electronically to your email address immediately after payment. We used the cailleux
roundness index chart and a ruler when measuring the clast size. This is due to the fact that there will
be less friction. We chose to sample eight sites along the River Holford’s course because this would.
When all the data was collectedand put into graphs. Depth (m) 2 0.015 0.027 0.067 0.105 0.0102
0.107 0.096 0.14. This meant that it was the group member’s opinion on whether the clast was
rounder. At site 4 the cross sectional area was 0.33852 m2 which was an increase from the. Water
energy is greater downstream, but unable to transport the heavier loads in suspension, resulting in
greater deposition downstream. There are more personal shops in Queens Street such a solicitors and
estate agents.This again shows more characteristics of the frame as it is a less densely populated area.
At reading 1 the depth was 0.043m and was the lowest measurement because it was. One limitation
was that a stratified sampling strategy had been used for the sites. Nettlecombe Court for
accommodating us and helping us with our river study along. Average Flow Rate (s) 100 47.733
58.507 15.68 13.565 16.55 81.33 87.163. This is a summary table showing if my hypotheses were
accepted visually, by looking. In many places there were twigs, leaves and weeds in the river, thus
blocking the oranges path and slowing it down. The third reading we took was the wetted perimeter.
This is a particularly helpful method because it shows the land use of the core and frame. Average
Clast Size (cm) 9.84 9.6 8.64 10.28 12.64 5.38 11.14 7.34. There is also a Power point that includes a
starter activity, revision sheet (including all answers) and quiz to finish. The introduction and the
methodology were then written about the background of. My first hypothesis was that the width of
the channel would increase as you went. In the lower course of the river there is lateral erosionwhich.
This meant that we could not sample in this area and. Site 4 was near an urban area, (Holford),
which meant that there was concrete and. Discharge is purely a calculation and is calculated by
multiplying velocity and cross-section area. The width of a river channel increases as it goes
downstream because tributaries and. My reason for this I think is because the orange we used may
not have been floating when the clock was started. The gradient decreased from source to mouth and
this can be seen in this scatter. Some readings were defaulted at 100 seconds because at some sites,
the water was too.