Writing coursework, particularly on a complex topic like Rivers for a GCSE level, can be a

challenging task. It requires thorough research, analysis, and the ability to present information in a
structured and coherent manner. Here are some of the challenges students may face:

1. Research: Gathering accurate and relevant information about rivers, their geography,
ecology, and related topics can be time-consuming. Finding reliable sources and data is
crucial for a well-rounded coursework.
2. Analysis: Once the information is collected, students need to analyze it effectively. This
involves understanding the significance of various aspects of rivers, interpreting data, and
drawing meaningful conclusions.
3. Writing Skills: Articulating ideas clearly and concisely is essential. Many students struggle
with expressing their thoughts in a coherent and organized manner. A coursework demands a
good command of language and the ability to convey complex concepts.
4. Time Management: Balancing coursework with other academic and personal commitments
can be challenging. Meeting deadlines is crucial, and poor time management can lead to
rushed work and a lower quality outcome.

While completing a coursework independently is a valuable learning experience, some students may
find themselves overwhelmed. In such cases, seeking assistance from professional services like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ could be an option. It's important to note that using such services should be
approached with caution, ensuring that ethical guidelines are followed, and the work is used as a
reference or a learning aid rather than submission as one's own.

If you decide to seek help, make sure to communicate clearly with the service provider about your
expectations, provide guidelines and materials you have, and carefully review the final work before
submission. Remember that the goal of coursework is not just to get a good grade but to deepen your
understanding of the subject.
A x-y plot was chosen to represent the cross sectionof the river because it is easy to. In many places
there were twigs, leaves and weeds in the river, thus blocking the oranges path and slowing it down.
However, the most greatly affected hypothesis was discharge. The results show this, shallower banks
rather than deeper river beds in the middle. Overall, our river study on the River Holford was very
successful because we took a. This would have ensured that the sites I had chosen typified that
stretch of river. Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on.
The depth stayed the same at readings 1 and 2 and was 0.105m. It then increased. Objectives: We
will be looking at a number of different factors that change throughout. I ensured that the metre rule
was perpendicular to the riverbed, and that it was pushed in sideways, so as not to create a large
amount of resistance from the water. For this hypothesis I believe that my methods were very good,
and not much could be done to improve them. We had to measure the long axis of the pebble to see
if this was true. Discharge is purely a calculation and is calculated by multiplying velocity and cross-
section area. From secondary to post-16, we have everything from French lessons to algebra
activities, as well as GCSE revision guides and more. At site 5 the five readings taken across the
width of the channel were quite varied. Flow Rate (s) 3 100 45.7 17.06 15.9 22.69 18.97 43.99 100.
It is hard to read a very small change in volume displaced. The depth increases until plot 3, until plot
4 where there is a decrease. The width. This reduces the river water volumes preventing floods and
decreasing erosion rates. We could have compared data with other groups taking part in this study to
see if we. As you can see from the table above, this hypothesis. I will also be justifying why I used a
particular type of graph as. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to
leave some feedback. There seems to be a pattern that follows for the M depth in all 3 sites as it
increases at all 3 sites. However, as a large quantity of pebbles was measured, mistakes could have
been made in the writing down of the number or the category which the pebble falls into. Overall,
all the depth readings at this site were what was expected to be seen at this. The velocity was
measured using a hydroprop and an impeller. My hypothesis would have been answered correctly,
and may well have given me a different outcome. At site 4 the cross sectional area was 0.33852 m2
which was an increase from the. Epping Forest Field Centre offers throughout the year many
educational and recreational events for all.
My third hypothesis was that gradient would decrease as you went from source to. It was originally
built with the intentions of it being a. Land use along the course of the River Holford is important to
look at because it could. As the river was small, this would have affected my hypotheses. The depth
then increased until plot 5, (where the water was at its deepest), and then. To measure the size of the
bedload, callipers were used to measure the length, width and height of the pebbles. See other similar
resources ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for.
Farming plays a major role in Somerset because it does not only take up most of the. Reviews Select
overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. Depth (m) 1 0.015 0.045
0.037 0.105 0.105 0.055 0.043 0.092. Reading 2 was the lowest measurment that was taken and was
0.0102m. This may. Measurements 1 and 2 are the same at 0.015m and this was correct because the.
The depth increases until plot 3, until plot 4 where there is a decrease. The width. I would make if I
were going to undertake this river study again. This reduces the stream water volume and rates of
lateral and vertical erosion, also the speed velocity of the river. The River Holford is 7.4 km long and
has three main types of geology throughout its. A systematic sampling method could have been used
rather than a stratified one if we. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's
good to leave some feedback. A further technique is now required to test the significance of the
relationship. The. I could have improved these methods, by using a metal tape measure instead of the
plastic one, which would not have bent in the wind. Another explanation of why the width readings
were not as the hypothesis had. The gradient of the river starts to decrease rapidly as you go from
site1 to site 2. Then. This could have lead me to conclude wrongly about the hypothesis. A x-y plot
was chosen to represent the cross sectionof the river because it is easy to. There are three types of
sampling methods which could have been used on this river. One limitation was that a stratified
sampling strategy had been used for the sites. Any incorporation of material from this work or a
paraphrase of such material without acknowledgment will be treated as plagiarism on your behalf.
This meant that we expected the river to be shallow at these. See other similar resources ?2.00 (no
rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. We chose to sample
eight sites along the River Holford’s course because this would.
At site 2 the cross sectional area was 0.28035 m2 which was higher than at the. Wetted Perimeter (m)
0.74 2.4 2.48 2.08 2 3.13 2.84 2.92. Also, as I did not do a pilot study, and only measured the river
once in the summer, my results and conclusions could be affected. At site 3 the cross sectional area
was 0.155036 m2 which shows that there was an. The depth stayed the same at readings 1 and 2 and
was 0.105m. It then increased. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's
good to leave some feedback. However, as a large quantity of pebbles was measured, mistakes could
have been made in the writing down of the number or the category which the pebble falls into. My
hypothesis’ account for many of the key river features like the depth, velocity, width etc, making it
all possible of investigating at Loughton Brook. Site 1 was upland near the surface close to the
source; Site 2 was near the middle of the river focused mainly around the meanders and ox-bow
lakes and Site 3 was at a lowland land area of the river close to the mouth. See other similar
resources ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for.
Bradshaw’s model is generalised in the way that it tells you what is expected to. Our customer service
team will review your report and will be in touch. ?1.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for
later ?1.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 19 March 2020 Share this
Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share
through pinterest jkett Not the right resource. At site 1 the cross sectional area was 0.008418 m2,
which is the lowest result out of all. Geography Field Study River Investigation Coursework. You
had to look through the surveyor’s level at an E-. Epping is in South West Essex and is part of South
East England. Depth (m) 5 0.016 0.51 0.083 0.04 0.07 0.089 0.053 0.15. My results were affected
because the above factors denied the reading from being accurate and in some cases gave a false
result for velocity. At site 5 the five readings taken across the width of the channel were quite varied.
It will also erode the banks by attrition because of the rocks that have been carried along by the river,
will smash into the sides of the banks and erode more of the earth away causing the width to
increase. Hypothesis 1- The width of the river will increase as you move from the source to. I have
chosen to represent my data for width as a lateral bar chart because it is very. Firstly, the orange used
was quite heavy, and when in the water, most of it was submerged, therefore it moved more slowly.
In this section I will be analysing my results to see if my hypothesis were correct and. Being a Site of
Specific Scientific Interest (SSSI), research is undertaken here. In Kilve the channel has been altered
by man making them more. At the first three sites there was dense forest to both sides of the river,
(which can be. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some
feedback. We had to measure the long axis of the pebble to see if this was true.