All the allegations in paragraph 7Every time he shouted at the respondent and used to throw vessels

while quarreling. One day he destroyed the television which had been gifted by the mother of the
respondent after marriage. This respondent knew cooking but this petitioner was not ready to buy
vegetables and grocery items. He was reluctant even to buy milk for making tea. The gas stove, utensils,
mixer etc. had been given by the mother of the respondent as a gift. He never spent even a single penny
for buying household articles and other things. The respondent’s life was miserable and she was locked
in the said house by the petitioner all the day. One day the house owner of the rented house enquired
the respondent the reason why she was locked inside and on the very next week he shifted to another
house in a remote area where inhabitants were very less. She sacrificed everything for the sake of family
life. Even then she was ousted from the rented house all of a sudden because of the greediness of this
petitioner. The marriage alliance came during the COVID pandemic. The respondent did not get an
opportunity to enquire about the petitioner, yet a politician residing in the neighborhood of the
respondent enquired and informed the mother of the respondent that this petitioner was a fraud and
thereby the marriage once fixed between the petitioner and the respondent was cancelled and amount
given to book wedding hall was also refunded. Thereafter one of the friends of the petitioner called the
mother of the respondent and told him that the petitioner was crying and threatening to commit
suicide. Then only feeling sympathy towards him the mother of the respondent decided to confirm this
alliance. Actually, the petitioner was a fraud, aiming at the money and property of the respondent. The
allegations in Paragraph 8 are utterly false and hence denied. The petitioner and the respondent resided
together in the second house till 26-3-2022. The respondent’s father passed away on 1-1-2007 and he
had some immovable property near Thaliyal, Thiruvananthapuram. To make registration of the property
in the name of this respondent, she went from the rented house in the morning and returned in the
evening. While coming back, she was not allowed to enter into the rented house. She was forcefully
ousted from the said house since she was not ready to transfer the property in the name of the
petitioner. He was very greedy and after taking all the gold ornaments weighing 65 sovereigns, money
worth Rs. 100000, Toyota Glanza car worth rupees 10 lakhs and household articles into his custody,
deserted this respondent all of a sudden. All the allegations in Paragraph 9 of the OP are false and hence
denied. On 3-8-2022, two relatives of the respondent went to the office of the petitioner and talked for a
settlement. They begged him to return the articles, car and gold ornaments. They asked him to file a
mutual petition before the honorable family court. But he shouted at them saying that he was not ready
to return anything and threatened that he would file complaint with police and filed a complaint.