Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Prisma

    Uploaded by

    Shanna Famaloan
    3 views1 page
    This document outlines the process for identifying new studies for a review. 452 records were initially identified from databases and registers, with 30 removed as duplicates. The remaining 422 records were screened, with 56 excluded, leaving 366 to be assessed for eligibility. No records met the eligibility criteria to be included in the review. The process did not identify any new studies to include.

    Original Description:

    prisma sample

    Original Title

    prisma

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines the process for identifying new studies for a review. 452 records were initially identified from databases and registers, with 30 removed as duplicates. The remaining 422 records were screened, with 56 excluded, leaving 366 to be assessed for eligibility. No records met the eligibility criteria to be included in the review. The process did not identify any new studies to include.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Prisma

    Uploaded by

    Shanna Famaloan
    This document outlines the process for identifying new studies for a review. 452 records were initially identified from databases and registers, with 30 removed as duplicates. The remaining 422 records were screened, with 56 excluded, leaving 366 to be assessed for eligibility. No records met the eligibility criteria to be included in the review. The process did not identify any new studies to include.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Identification of new studies via databases and registers

    Records removed before screening:


    Identification

    Records identified from: Duplicate records (n = 30)


    Databases (n = 0) Records marked as ineligible by automation
    Registers (n = 0) tools (n = 0)
    Records removed for other reasons (n = 0)

    Records screened Records excluded


    (n = 452) (n = 56)
    Screening

    Reports sought for retrieval Reports not retrieved


    (n = 6) (n = 6)

    Reports excluded:
    Reports assessed for eligibility Reason1 (n = xxx)
    (n = 0) Reason2 (n = xxx)
    Reason3 (n = xxx)

    New studies included in review


    Included

    (n = 0)
    Reports of new included studies
    (n = 0)

    You might also like