Professional Documents
Culture Documents
80
the Friend
discover the contemporary quaker way
Cathars and
Quakers
the Friend Independent Quaker Journalism Since 1843
Cover image:
The Château de Puilaurens, one of the Cathar castles of the Languedoc region.
Photo: Andy Hay / flickr CC.
See pages 10-11.
the Friend 173 Euston Road, London NW1 2BJ Tel: 020 7663 1010 Fax: 020 7663 1182 www.thefriend.org
Editor: Ian Kirk-Smith editorial@thefriend.org • Sub-editor: Trish Carn trishc@thefriend.org • Production and office manager: Elinor Smallman
production@thefriend.org • Journalist: Tara Craig news@thefriend.org • Arts editor: Rowena Loverance arts@thefriend.org • Environment editor:
Laurie Michaelis green@thefriend.org • Subscriptions officer: Penny Dunn subs@thefriend.org Tel: 020 7663 1178 • Advertisement manager:
George Penaluna, Ad department, 54a Main Street, Cononley, Keighley BD20 8LL Tel: 01535 630230 ads@thefriend.org •
Clerk of the trustees: Nicholas Sims • ISSN: 0016-1268 • The Friend Publications Limited is a registered charity, number 211649 •
Printed by Headley Bros Ltd, Queens Road, Ashford, Kent TN24 8HH
Keep the
memory alive
T
he 27 January is the seventieth anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-
Birkenau concentration camp. Holocaust Memorial Day, held annually on this
day, will be commemorated in homes, schools and communities both nationally
and internationally. This year the theme is ‘Keep the memory alive’.
Holocaust Memorial Day is a day when people can pause to remember the millions
who have been murdered or whose lives were changed beyond recognition during
the Holocaust/Shoah. The Day is also dedicated to the memory of those killed in
subsequent genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia and Darfur. 2015 is the twentieth
anniversary of the massacre in Srebrenica.
In its immediate aftermath, the Holocaust went largely unacknowledged. Perpetrators
and bystanders preferred to forget. A painful reality for European Christians is the
complicity of many Christians and churches in the Nazis’ attempt to exterminate the
Jewish people - a shameful chapter in a long history of Christian anti-Semitism.
The Holocaust is a sad reminder of what people are capable of. Commemoration
gradually began in Israel, where many survivors had gathered. The industrial slaughter
of European Jews, however, was viewed by some of those building a new country as an
image of passivity. Today, times have changed.
Holocaust Memorial Day reminds us of a statistic: six million dead. Every one
had a name and a story. At the heart of the event this year are human stories. One is
highlighted in the news pages of the Friend this week. There is a review, in the books
pages, of a novel based on the lives of real people who assisted Jews escape from the
Nazis. A central character was involved in the Quaker response to the crisis faced by the
Jewish people in the 1930s. Friends were there when it mattered.
The Day also challenges us to honour the survivors by learning lessons from the
past. Discrimination and persecution, sadly, still haunt our society. Fear of the ‘other’
is part of the human condition. Stereotypes, and the hatred that often goes with them,
continue. They simplify, distort and demean. Quakers have a clear position. There is
‘that of God’ in every individual and this belief compels us to action. It is morally wrong
to apply stereotypes to any group who share a common identity and sense of belonging.
They are made up of individuals. Faith groups, who are particularly vulnerable to being
defined as ‘the other’, need support, love and understanding at this time, as Christopher
Bagley reminds us in his opinion piece.
There have been very disturbing incidents of anti-Semitism across Europe, including
Britain, in the wake of the recent murders in Paris. They are of grave concern.
The lessons of the past mean nothing if non-Jewish people today care more about the
historical tragedy of dead Jews than the plight of living ones.
Ian Kirk-Smith
Editor of the Friend
Mosques
and swords
I
n 1969 I was a student in Paris, disillusioned with Charlie Hebdo’s insistence on provoking all Muslims.
organised religion and excited and alarmed by the The day after the attacks I was at Jordans Meeting
revolutionary fervour of post-1968 France. One house. There I made my first visit to the graves of
day, on a wander through the fifth arrondissement, Isaac Penington and William Penn. Driving home to
I chanced upon the main Paris Mosque. I remember Suffolk, I found that both helped me.
my amazement at the beauty of the mosaic tiling and As I listened to the radio I heard of the young
a conversation that I had with an Imam, or perhaps he Muslim worker at the Jewish supermarket and Isaac
was merely a local Muslim, and the revelation during Penington’s phrase ‘helping one another up with a
that conversation that there is great beauty and power tender hand’ came to mind. Amidst the extremity
in not revealing the nature of God or his prophets and the horror the young man had done just that. A
pictorially. Perhaps this set me on a track towards picture came to my mind, too, of the furious, angry
Quakers. young William Penn rushing to defend his new found
Every week, at that time, I would buy or borrow Quakers with his sword – the sword that he put
a copy of Le Canard Enchaîné, the French satirical down when he was ready and found a way to create
magazine. I became acquainted with the work of community without it.
Georges Wolinski, who was murdered in the attack on As we witness angry, vengeful youths wielding
the Charlie Hebdo offices. I would enjoy wry smiles as Kalashnikov rifles and, indeed, angry vengeful police
he poked fun at the French establishment. He would and soldiers bent upon killing the evil ones, we need,
often fuel fervent discussions with French friends on more than ever, to hear and understand the injunction
politics and religion and the brave new world that in Isaiah to beat swords into ploughshares (Isaiah 2:4).
we could not agree about, but was surely around the We all need a sense of humour, Quakers no less than
corner. Then Charlie Hebdo came along a year or so anyone. All the more so when we are gently chided,
later. as in the cartoons of Gerard Hoffnung or some of UA
Today, the fact that it emerged from the ashes of a Fanthorpe’s poetry. We can warm, too, to the glorious
scabrous banned journal called Hara-Kiri feels bitterly spiritual chortles of Desmond Tutu or the Dalai Lama.
ironic. I must confess that I rarely managed to read My feelings are mixed, again, on seeing the cover of
more than a page or two. Nor did I laugh or smile the latest edition of Charlie Hebdo: sorrow at the loss
much, even at Wolinski. I would feel angry at the of the journalists and the need to provoke, but hope
magazine’s confrontational tone and its desire to show in the words used that ‘All is forgiven’. Nobody should
disrespect to all. have the last word, but William Penn helps me again
So, when the murderous, suicidal assassins struck in when he said: ‘We are too ready to retaliate, rather
France, venting their anger at journalists, policemen than forgive, or gain by love and information.’
and women, Jewish shoppers and children, I felt, along
with my shock and sorrow, extreme discomfort. I was
painfully aware that I shared some of the anger about Martin is a member of Bury St Edmunds Meeting.
Charity
and restraint
T
hose who claim journalistic privilege in seeking the right to satirise religion,
and religious figures, may have never viewed the original cartoons that
enraged some Muslims to the point of murderous madness. During the Paris
massacre I was in Europe and viewed with horror and sadness certain cartoons
that some journals had seen fit to reproduce in the wake of the mass fugue that
‘We are all Charlie now’.
Consider one such cartoon: the blessed prophet Muhammad is kneeling in
prayer. His robe is uplifted revealing his naked backside. Out of this backside
emanates a speech bubble making a statement which sneers at Allah, implying that
Muhammad is a self-serving hypocrite.
Cartoons such as this are vile, obscene and cruel. The vicarious insult expressed
against religion that they offer cannot be justified by any events in recent history.
Muslims are hated by many Europeans and this kind of cartoon, I believe, serves
the same purpose as Nazi propaganda cartoons that depicted Jews as rat-like
money grubbers, seeking to take over the world in the name of their god, which
was lucre.
The reason that most Britons have not viewed cartoons such as these is because
of a sensible and balanced piece of legislation: the Racial and Religious Hatred Act
2006, which prescribes severe penalties for the press and others who use speech
and mass communication devices to publish messages (including cartoons) that
are likely to stir hatred, and hateful acts, against religious and racial minorities. No
other European country, I believe, has legislation of quite this kind.
At Didsbury Mosque in Manchester this week an Imam gave an inspired sermon,
comparing Muhammad and Jesus. Both men suffered numerous insults and
scourges, but always restrained their followers from any violent retribution. We
were enjoined to do likewise, returning good to the malefactor, not punishing or
killing them. This, of course, is a message for Quakers as well as for all Christians,
Jews and Muslims.
We do not seek the freedom to cruelly criticise the theologies, Gods, preachers
and prophets of other religions. We seek instead understanding, love, and interfaith
understanding, knowing that sometimes we may be wrong.
C
athars and Quakers both grew from a strong centuries, especially in the former county of Toulouse,
desire to find a personal spiritual reality. This, which stretched from Germany to Spain and was
in many ways, reflected that of the earliest greater than the king of France’s domain to the north
Christians and was not found in the orthodox church. (although in theory its subject). Rich in trade for many
Both met with persecution. It is more a product of hundreds of years since the Roman ‘civilisation’, it was
their different historical times that the Cathars were also an exceptionally rich and tolerant mix of learning
ruthlessly eradicated in the twelfth century while the and religion – a predecessor to the Italian renaissance
Quakers survived persecution in the seventeenth and in its ideals.
continue today. Some regions, such as Carcassonne and Foix, were
The Cathar ‘church’ is now a popular study, even if more beholden to the king of Aragon than to Toulouse
not an ongoing organisation, and its ideals are finding and practiced a great independence. Tolerance of Jews
new resonance in the wider religious consciousness of and of Judaic and Islamic teachings was widespread.
our times. Quakers talk of ‘a light that is shining from The Cathar ‘heresy’, which sprang partly from east
within’. This echoes the Cathar evocation of weaving a European Bogomil beliefs, found open minds at this
garment of light, of being re-clothed (révetu) in spirit. time, alongside the movement of chivalry and its poems
Both movements are mystical, Gnostic, of courtly love, the legends of the Grail, reverence of the
nonconforming, nonhierarchical, nonpatriarchal, Magdalene and the sacred feminine, the esotericism
pacifist, believers in personal salvation or enlightenment of the Templars and the music of the Troubadours.
without need of priests or altars. They have an open This sophisticated flowering of culture and tolerance,
tolerance of others’ beliefs and inspirations. Both also moving out of the feudal into the democratic, was
share a firm commitment to living your spiritual values too fragmented and independent to resist the heavily
in community more than preaching them: people of organized crusade against it. This crusade crushed
faith, vision and service. a whole society, along with its religious heresy, for
political more than religious motives.
The grassroots
Brutal extermination
What was to become known as Catharism grew strongly
at a grassroots level in a time of remarkable freedom The Cathars and their sympathisers were brutally
and cultural development in the twelfth and thirteenth exterminated by an armed crusade that began in 1209.
Enlistment:
a case for disownment?
Janet Scott highlights a fierce debate
F
rom early in the first world war there was superior officer, although his whole moral sense may
discussion amongst Friends about the attitude to recoil therefrom. This surrender of that which is one
be taken to members of the Religious Society of of God’s most precious gifts is, we think, disastrous,
Friends who enlisted in the armed forces. By 1915 the and is a negation of the fundamental principle for
debate was becoming fierce and it eventually reached which Friends are called to stand. Added to this is
the Yearly Meeting. The essential question, which the fact, obvious though perhaps not always realised,
should still concern us today, was how to weigh the that he who enlists in the fighting line enlists to kill,
freedom of the individual to follow the Light as he or a purpose utterly out of harmony with allegiance to
she saw it against the religious Truth encapsulated in the commands of Christ and with Friends’ idea of
the teaching and tradition of the Society. the nature of human personality. For these reasons it
appears to us that military service in any form, whether
In December 1914 Warwickshire North Monthly in the regular Army or Navy or Territorial Forces, is
Meeting received and discussed a report which included: incompatible with true membership of the Society
of Friends. In justice to those members who have
‘We think it will be the wish of the Monthly Meeting maintained their testimony, and to those outside the
to act towards the enlisters in a spirit of tenderness Society who are looking anxiously to us for a lead, we
and sympathy, and to avoid any semblance of harsh think the Monthly Meeting should make it clear that
judgment. In the absence of specific inquiry, we can we cannot permanently retain as members those who
only speak from common report as to the question of demonstrate by their action that they differ from us in
motive. This probably varies much in different cases. a matter so vital.’
We shall be on the safe side, however, if we take it for
granted that most of those who have enlisted did so The Friend, 18 December 1914
from a real sense of duty, and we may believe that their
obedience to what they conceived to be a call to self- The Friend commented in the same issue:
surrender will be the means of their advancement and
enlightenment in the things of God. And we remember ‘Our readers will be aware that this subject of the
that their response is a step which implies a willingness relation of the Society to members who have enlisted
to part with life itself, at an age when life is attractive has deeply exercised various Monthly Meetings – the
and full, and it cannot therefore be without an element disciplinary bodies primarily concerned – and we
of true goodness. have received many letters and communications on
the subject. We thankfully acknowledge that with
‘Yet we cannot but recognise that their action has few exceptions the matter has been considered in
gravely compromised the witness of the Society of a constraining and restraining spirit, and with that
Friends, more especially that part of it which relates to “tender and watchful care” which we should all desire
the essentially peaceable character of the Kingdom of to cultivate. We think Friends generally will feel that the
Christ. Any man entering the Army or Navy, whether document quoted above is a witness to the moderation,
the fighting department or the R.A.M.C. [Royal Army gravity and patience, the sympathy and regard, the
Medical Corps], by taking the enlistment oath hands sense of inward guidance, which should characterise
over his conscience without reserve to the keeping of the attitude of the Society and all of us as individuals to
another, and may not decline action ordered by his this difficult question.’
‘I hope that no absolute rule will be followed in ‘The Society appealed to me as a refuge from the
separating them all from the Society, either now or later. false standards of our time, and from the formalism of
There will be cases where the membership is merely the churches. I looked to it as the witness of the great
nominal and may be dropped without loss; but I plead principle which I believe is to regenerate our national
against an invariable rule. I know that I have but little and social life…
to urge, and that the plain, logical and straight-forward
course would be loss of membership by a soldier. It is an ‘The desire of John W. Graham to save for the Society
instinct rather than a logical process which leads me to the young men who have enlisted, and his concern for
wish to save these young men for the Society.’ the meetings of thirty years hence, are quite natural
and laudable. But what shall it profit if, in saving the
John W Graham young men, we lose the Society? It is not reasonable to
The Friend, 1 January 1915 expect that the Society will be strengthened by means of
the forces that have made a weakening of its principles
‘It is of far more importance that the testimony against necessary.’
all war should be maintained distinctly and untarnished,
especially in time of war, like the present, than that the John Moyle
individual love and sympathy for young Friend recruits The Friend, 8 January 1915
should lead to a lowering of the flag. Clearly, if there
were no soldiers, there would be no war.’ ‘Let me say that I have no wish whatever to disown any
young Friend who, in a moment of patriotic fervour
Robert Alsop Milner and enthusiasm, has enlisted. It may be that he will
The Friend, 1 January 1915 return a far more able advocate for Peace than those of
us who have remained at home.
‘Wrong and hideous as war is, there must be many
members of the Society who do not hold that “Peace ‘The men whom I would disown are those who
at any price” is a more “vital” doctrine than that of the have used their position as members of our Society
“Inward Light”; who think that once in a thousand years to encourage their younger brethren to join the army,
(perhaps oftener) the price may be too high, and that and in other ways have lent their support to militarism.
such a case has arisen now. If the young men who enlist This is a form of disloyalty which we have no right to
are to be disowned for obeying their consciences, does condone.’
it not follow that those of us who think that they are
acting rightly should be disowned also?’ E Vipont Brown
The Friend, 22 January 1915
Juliet M Godlee
The Friend, 1 January 1915 ‘My son is one of the “sinners” in the eyes of some, but
there are very many Friends who don’t put their views
‘It may be worthwhile to consider what we actually into writing, who quietly approve of the action of those
do in disowning a member. Beside severing a formal who are helping in the war, even by actual service. Not
connection, to my mind we first and foremost confess a single Friend of my acquaintance, and I include those
our own failure in the object of our institution. That is whom we call “good Friends”, has said, “I am sorry
the cardinal fact in every such act. We have had – in to see your son has enlisted.” They one and all have
these cases – our young men from youth up and have expressed approval…
failed adequately to impress them with the basis of
our belief in a moral and spiritual foundation to the ‘It is little use saying, “Wait until the war is over
world. We who are older should feel that these things and we will give them a talking to.” Friends had better
are largely our fault, and act accordingly. Our actions be content with their protest and leave well alone.
must therefore be based upon love, sympathy and with They will be up against a much bigger question than
the weakness of human understanding, and the sense of voluntary enlistment before very long.’
our own responsibility.’
Alfred Rawlings J George Brockbank
The Friend, 8 January 1915 The Friend, 22 January 1915
I
t is hard to explain anti-Semitism. The Christian from the mob that destroyed their home, breaking
church once held the Jews responsible for the death every piece of furniture and even smashing the pots
of Jesus, despite the fact that his execution was of jam and preserves that her mother had laid by for
carried out by Roman authority. Antipathy toward the the winter, ‘the liquid mess oozing blood red through
Jewish race has persisted throughout European history, broken glass’ on the floor.
denying citizenship and restricting Jews to ghettos Ruth was fortunate not to have perished in the gas
where they had no chance of making a living except ovens along with the million and a half Jewish children
by money-lending – a trade forbidden to Christians murdered in Hitler’s ‘final solution’. Instead, she was
by the church’s fatuous refusal to allow the charging of one of nearly 10,000 children rescued and brought to
interest. Jews were thus obliged to live apart from the England in 1939 in the so-called Kindertransport –
rest of society, envied for their wealth and blamed for organized by Quakers and others to save them.
all manner of crimes that they almost certainly didn’t Ruth’s book tells the story of how she was treated in
commit. England. The Jews who fled Hitler were regarded by
Simon de Montfort was one of the first to court most uncomprehending locals as ‘Germans’ (officially
popular favour by banning all Jews from Leicester in called ‘enemy aliens’) and even suspected of being
1231 – a move copied by Edward I, sixty years later, for spies. Ruth was interrogated as an eleven year old by
the whole country. Jews were eventually allowed back the police after a vigilant neighbour saw her hiding
into England and anti-Semitism has not been among a note to one of her school friends in the crevice of a
our more prominent national failings. So, it is difficult dry-stone wall!
for most of us to appreciate how prevalent persecution There are heroes and heroines in this story as well
of Jews was in many other countries. In France, as villains. Above all there was Mina, the family
Russia and Poland periodic Jew-baiting was endemic. retainer – cook, housekeeper and surrogate mother to
Germany and Austria were notably less guilty, but in Ruth – who refused to obey Nazi orders by working
the economic depression brought about by the peace for the family and befriending them whenever she
settlement after the first world war, when Germany could. It was Mina who accompanied Ruth’s mother
was forced to make crippling payments – so-called and father up to the time when they boarded the train
reparations – to the allies, massive inflation followed, that took them on their final journey to their deaths at
for which Adolf Hitler blamed the Jewish community. Auschwitz.
Ordinary Germans were mesmerised by Hitler’s vision When they made their farewell, Ruth’s mother
of a proud and revitalised fatherland. They learned to thrust a bundle of papers into Mina’s hands. They
shut their eyes to the fate of their Jewish neighbours. were the letters sent by her four older children, who
Ruth David in Child of Our Time shows us what it had all managed to escape abroad. These letters are
was like to be on the receiving end of this policy. Her the topic of Ruth’s other book, Life Lines, which forms
father owned a cigar factory in Germany and was the a companion volume to Child of Our Time. Together
biggest employer in the locality. Ruth and her brothers they form an important contribution to the historical
and sisters went to school and played with the other record of what is, arguably, the greatest crime in
children. But, after 1934, Nazi laws made normal life human history.
more difficult. Ruth could no longer go to school or
play with ‘Aryan’ children.
Persecution came to a head in Kristallnacht, when Malcolm is a member of Leicester Meeting.
mobs smashed the windows of Jewish shops and
houses, and brutal attacks were officially encouraged Child of Our Time: A Young Girl’s Flight from the
against Jewish people and property. Ruth tells how Holocaust by Ruth David, I.B.Tauris, 2003, ISBN:
she and her sister cowered in the family car to hide 9781860647895, £22.50. Order form on page 18.
D
uring the first two years of the second world novel. On one occasion 600 meals were delivered to
war America was a neutral country and a shipment of Jews and others – men in bare cattle
American Quakers, unlike British ones, were trucks and women and children in old coaches with
able to conduct relief work in mainland Europe. A loos – when the train stopped briefly in Toulouse
glimpse into the records has enabled Bernard Wilson, before leaving for the unknown east.
a Canterbury Friend, to write a young person’s The history of the camps is one of blistering heat,
novel about how a family fared when occupation, sand-laden winds, treeless scrub, tangled barbed
racism, internment, death and the issue of refugees wire, shelter-less cold and stinking latrines. Children
hit southern France. In See you soon Caroline! the who received portions of rice gobbled them from
romantic dimension in the novel – for intended young discarded Nestlé tins, but many adults starved to
readers – is wrapped up in historical insights, which death. Some American rations supplied by Quakers
can seriously grip those who lived through the very were blockaded by Britain lest they fall into military
dark year of 1940. rather than refugee hands. The first internees, half a
When a totally English teenager finds, unexpectedly, million of them, arrived almost overnight after the fall
that a grandparent had – as a baby – been a Jewish of Barcelona. Next came Germans, gypsies, democrats,
Holocaust survivor in a camp at the foot of the Jews, pacifists, Jehovah’s Witnesses – all equally
Pyrenees, the fast-paced story unwinds. The American unwelcome in an impoverished French province.
Friends Service Committee (AFSC), the Paris Among the courageous women who tried to bring a
Holocaust Museum, remote Catholic monasteries breath of humanity to the camps – risking months in
and philanthropic food banks all jostle to provide prison for their efforts – were members of the Swiss
interesting and often surprising insights into a Red Cross. One of them, like the Irish heroine of this
terrifying world that France has not yet managed to book’s historical chapters, recently received an Israeli
forget but which is barely known in the Anglo-Saxon medal of recognition for saving the lives of many
world. children. One ended up in Surrey as the grandfather of
The fictional social worker at the centre of the story the fictional child who tells the story.
is based on the courageous life of an Irish woman A saccharine romance for sixteen-year-olds may
who worked for the AFSC. Bernard Wilson was not appeal to all readers of the Friend. However,
able to interview her children seventy years after the remembering the historical horrors we Europeans
horror, which accompanied the closing of the camps inflicted upon one another seventy years before the
at Perpignan and the railing of thousands of victims horrors began unfolding in Greater Syria is icily
to Poland for extermination. This refugee service had sobering.
begun in 1939 when it was Spaniards fleeing Francisco
Franco, rather than Germans fleeing Adolf Hitler, David is a member of East Kent Area Meeting
who were temporarily protected from starvation and
persecution. Documented accounts of the camps, the See you soon Caroline! by Bernard S Wilson, Shore
bureaucracy and the trains, are interwoven into the Books and Design, 2014, ISBN: 9780993022227, £6.99.
The Salter statues. Left: Alfred. Centre: Joyce. Right: Ada. Photos: Jamie Simonds.
pl
e Friends&Meetings
m
e
sa y
p
Changes of clerk London Quakers
e
Fr co Friday 20 February, 6.30pm
HORSHAM QUAKER MEETING
From 1 January, clerk: Ruth Hodgson
01444 401586. Mail to Horsham
Bring and sing
Meeting House, Worthing Road, Friends House
William Penn suite
Horsham RG12 1SL. Email
horshamquakermeeting@ Run by Patrick and Millie of
phonecoop.coop the Leaveners. Just turn up,
ready to enjoy yourself!
If you want to eat, bring food for
Diary yourself. Room opens at 6.30,
singing at 7, ends 8.30pm
2015: CRUNCH TIME IN EUROPE All welcome.
Quaker Council for European Affairs
Study Tour in Brussels and Strasbourg,
18-25 April 2015. Find out more at Meeting for
www.qcea.org/events or phone 0032 Sufferings
2230 4935. Register by 7 February.
Review Group
FAITH & ACTION: QUAKERS AND
THE FIRST WORLD WAR Relationships with
1914-18 Stories of peace, war, conscience, relief
and faith. Exhibition, Birmingham
Listed Informal Groups
Digital Archive Museum and Art Gallery, curated by Meeting for Sufferings is
reviewing the way Britain
Central England Area Meeting.
The Friend 1914-18 Digital 17 January – 7 June 2015. Yearly Meeting relates to Listed
Archive offers a unique wwone.ceq@btinternet.com Informal Groups and other
treasure trove of Quaker Quaker bodies in Britain. It has
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL DAY appointed a small group which
and social history. See the ‘Etty’ one woman play based on the wants to contact all Quaker-
fascinating extracts from diaries and letters of Etty Hillesum, related groups and organisations.
our archive in this issue. performed by Susan Stein. 7pm
If you have not been contacted
Tuesday 27 January. Amersham
For a free sample copy of Meeting House HP7 OJB. Tickets and would like to be included in
our 7 August 1914 issue £10/£6 from: 01494 876594 or our review, please let us know
office@jordansquakercentre.org by contacting:
visit our website at
www.thefriend.org/archive A Chilterns Quaker Programme Event. Juliet Prager
and select ‘free sample’. Deputy Recording Clerk
WHAT DO WE THINK ABOUT GOD? Friends House, 173 Euston Rd,
The full 1914–18 archive is London Quakers, Quaker Dialogue 17. London NW1 2BJ
Saturday 7 February, 10.30am-1pm. 0207 663 1101
available to individual No charge. No need to book. Friends
subscribers of the Friend at sufferings@quaker.org.uk
House, 173 Euston Road, London
the reduced rate of just NW1 2BJ. www.londonquakers.org.uk Registered charity no. 1127633
£12 a year (usual rate £50).
Simply phone Penny Dunn Luton and Leighton Area Meeting
on 020 7663 1178 to con- Pre-election conference
firm the sum due to cover
the remaining balance of Watford Meeting House, Sunday 8 February. 2 – 5pm
your current subscription. Making Us More Equal in the UK:
To take a new subscription What We Ask of Politicians
to the Friend with access Tax Justice – The Pay Gap – Fuel Poverty – Fair Money
Presentations - Workshops – Discussions
to the 1914-18 Digital With expert speakers from a range of organisations
Archive see the subscription Some places still available – contact Don Atkinson at
form overleaf or visit don@dcat12.com or 01582 762837
www.thefriend.org Changing the national narrative on equality
Classified ads
Hull Local
Quaker where to stay
Meeting GUESTHOUSES, HOTELS, B&BS
su
b S
an scr tart
d ipt 2
Fr io 01
ie n 5
vol 173 No 4
ADVERTISEMENT DEPT EDITORIAL
the Friend
54a Main Street 173 Euston Road
Cononley London NW1 2BJ
Keighley BD20 8LL T 020 7663 1010
T 01535 630230 F 020 7663 11-82
E ads@thefriend.org E editorial@thefriend.org