Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shi 2020
Shi 2020
1558-1748 © 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See https://www.ieee.org/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Imperial College London. Downloaded on June 20,2020 at 09:48:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
7348 IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. 20, NO. 13, JULY 1, 2020
Authorized licensed use limited to: Imperial College London. Downloaded on June 20,2020 at 09:48:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SHI et al.: MONITORING WATER CONTENT OF BLOOD DURING HEMODIALYSIS BASED ON COMPLEX 7349
TABLE I
Fig. 3. Measured relative permittivity of pure water and apple juice.
B RIX VALUE AND WATER C ONTENT OF A PPLE J UICE
TABLE II
PARAMETERS OF A PPLE J UICE D ETERMINED BY C ALIBRATION
This technology has since been extended to higher frequencies TABLE III
and measurement accuracy has been improved [13]–[15], but E STIMATED WATER C ONTENT OF J UICE S AMPLES W ITH C ALIBRATION
the basic principle is as described above.
Fig. 2 shows the setup of complex permittivity measure-
ment and water content estimation. The picture was taken
for validation experiment with juice and aqueous solution of
glucose. At first, we employed a kind of apple juice of 100%
pure fruit as a sample. Then we diluted it with pure water
and produced another two kinds of diluted samples. So each
sample was mainly composed of water and sugar content, and apple juice. The curves of the relative permittivity versus
a Brix meter was used to measure the Brix value defined as frequency for the diluted juices are between the two curves,
a value corresponding to the mass percentage of the sucrose although they are not shown to avoid having too many curves
solution at 20o C. The water content in each sample was then to make the figure difficult to see. The relative permittivity of
converted from the Brix value based on the density of sucrose the pure water agrees with the theoretical value [20], and the
of 1.587g/cm3. Table I shows the measured Brix values and relative permittivity of apple juice decreases when decreasing
converted water contents for the samples. Similar to blood, the water content or increasing the sugar content.
juice is also composed of the water content and other contents. As the first step of verification, we employed the 100%
Why we used juice for validation is because we can know its apple juice with known water content (91.5%) for calibration.
correct water content using a Brix meter. In addition, there is The calibration aimed to determine the two parameters of
no difference in composition between apple juice and other εm and τm of sugar by Eq. (4) with known α. Applying
juices, since they all made of water and other ingredients. the least-square-method-based curve fitting tool in Matlab to
The apply juice used was commercially available, and its the measured relative permittivity values of 100% apple juice,
ingredients were 100% from apple. we determined the two parameters εm and τm of sugar.
The calibration procedure consists of two steps. The first Table II shows the determined two parameters from the 100%
step is to calibrate the dielectric probe and the network apple juice. The two parameters were assumed not to change
analyzer. The dielectric probe is connected to short and open when diluting the juice with pure water.
terminals, respectively, and inserted into pure water to perform After knowing the two parameters of εm and τm of sugar
the calibration process of S-parameter and complex permittiv- by calibration, we used the proposed method to estimate
ity measurement. The second step is a calibration to determine the water contents for the two diluted juice samples based
the two parameter εm and τm in the Debye expression. But on the measured relative permittivity. Table III shows the
this step is not always possible, especially in actual use. It can estimation results of water content. Also shown in the table for
be omitted as described later. In that case, only the first step comparison are the converted water content from Brix values.
is required in the calibration process. As can be seen, the estimated water contents are within a
Fig. 3 shows the curves of relative permittivity versus range of difference of 1% from the Brix meter’s results. So the
frequency from 2.5 to 3.0 GHz, measured using the network method is feasible to estimate the water content as long as a
analyzer and dielectric probe, for pure water and 100% calibration is adequately conducted.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Imperial College London. Downloaded on June 20,2020 at 09:48:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
7350 IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. 20, NO. 13, JULY 1, 2020
TABLE IV
E STIMATED WATER C ONTENT OF J UICE
S AMPLES W ITHOUT C ALIBRATION
TABLE V
SSE AT D IFFERENT F REQUENCY R ANGES
TABLE VI
PARAMETERS OF G LUCOSE D ETERMINED BY C ALIBRATION
Authorized licensed use limited to: Imperial College London. Downloaded on June 20,2020 at 09:48:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SHI et al.: MONITORING WATER CONTENT OF BLOOD DURING HEMODIALYSIS BASED ON COMPLEX 7351
TABLE VII
E STIMATED WATER C ONTENT OF AQUEOUS S OLUTIONS
OF G LUCOSE W ITH C ALIBRATION
TABLE VIII
E STIMATED WATER C ONTENT OF AQUEOUS S OLUTIONS
OF G LUCOSE W ITHOUT C ALIBRATION
Fig. 6. Relative permittivity versus frequency for blood, water, and the
other materials in the blood.
TABLE IX
G ENDER AND AGE OF 18 H EMODIALYSIS PATIENTS
TABLE X
E STIMATED WATER C ONTENTS OF B LOOD FOR 18
H EMODIALYSIS PATIENTS B EFORE D IALYSIS
Authorized licensed use limited to: Imperial College London. Downloaded on June 20,2020 at 09:48:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
7352 IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. 20, NO. 13, JULY 1, 2020
TABLE XI
AVERAGE AND S TANDARD D EVIATION OF WATER C ONTENT OF B LOOD
of blood and other parameters. As can be seen, the variations VII. C ONCLUSION
in εm and τm are small which suggests an insignificant In this paper, we have proposed a method for estimating
individual difference in the blood. We further compared the the water content of blood during dialysis based on the
estimated water contents for the 18 hemodialysis patients complex permittivity measured using a network analyzer and
before and after hemodialysis. Fig. 7 shows the results. It can an open-loaded probe. To verify its effectiveness, we have first
be seen that the water content decreased for all the patients by applied this method to apple juice and then to an aqueous
the hemodialysis. The estimated water contents of blood are solution of glucose. The results have shown that the measure-
between 35% and 45% after dialysis, which basically falls in ment error is within 9% regardless of whether a calibration
the range of usual value of water content of blood. Therefore, solution could be prepared. We have applied this method
a change in water content of blood was indeed estimated to monitor the water content of blood for 18 hemodialysis
from a change in complex permittivity of blood, and there patients during dialysis. The water contents after dialysis have
is sufficient possibility of using it for real time monitoring of shown an obvious decrease in the blood, ranging between
the amount of water during hemodialysis. 35% and 45%, that roughly fall in the reasonable range of
water content of blood. Moreover, the correlation analysis
VI. C ORRELATION OF WATER C ONTENT between the water content and the hematocri in the blood
W ITH H EMATOCRIT has shown a strong correlation with a correlation coefficient
In addition, it is also possible to link the water content to as high as −0.8. These results demonstrate the feasibility to
other biochemical components of the hemodialysis patients. monitor the water content of blood as well as the hematocrit or
Hematocrit is a numerical value indicating the ratio of the anemia state based on the complex permittivity measurement
volume of blood cells in the blood. It is almost equal to the during dialysis.
volume ratio of erythrocytes, and is usually used for anemia One limitation of the proposed method is that in most cases
examination. If the water content of blood is large (the blood we have to estimate the three parameters εm , τm and the
is thin), the hematocrit will decreases, so that a negative water content α at the same time. This does not guarantee
correlation should be observed. This suggests a possibility that the solution is unique, and some estimation errors may
of also observing the hematocrit of hemodialysis patients occur if the estimation range is not properly chosen. Another
from the water content of blood. In view of the usefulness limitation is the use of expensive network analyzer. To make
of hematocrit for anemia examination, we investigated the the method more practical, a compact complex permittivity
correlation between the water content and hematocrit. The measurement sensor is required instead of a network analyzer,
values of hematocrit for the 18 homedialysis patients were and its implementation is our future subject.
measured by usual biochemical analysis in a hospital, and
the water contents of blood were obtained in the previous
section. As a result, the correlation relationship between the ACKNOWLEDGMENT
water content of blood and the hematocrit is shown in Fig. 8. The authors would like to thank Dr. A. Takeda, Chubu
The correlation coefficient between them was found as −0.8, University, Japan, for providing the blood samples.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Imperial College London. Downloaded on June 20,2020 at 09:48:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SHI et al.: MONITORING WATER CONTENT OF BLOOD DURING HEMODIALYSIS BASED ON COMPLEX 7353
Authorized licensed use limited to: Imperial College London. Downloaded on June 20,2020 at 09:48:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.