Professional Documents
Culture Documents
powered by
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
Since 2021, the MSC and Kekst CNC have collected data to answer core
questions that help understand global risk perceptions: Do people think
that the world is becoming a riskier place? Is there a global consensus on
some of the grave risks that humanity is facing today? And how prepared
do societies feel to tackle these threats? By combining five metrics, the
index provides an in-depth view of how 12 countries view 32 major risks
over time. This edition of the MSI is based on representative samples of
1,000 people from each G7 country and BRICS countries except Russia
(“BICS”). A survey with selected questions was also conducted in Ukraine.
The total sample thus amounts to 12,000 people. Polling was conducted
between October 24 and November 16, 2023, using industry-leading online
panels. The local surveys were carried out by trusted and reputable
fieldwork partners in compliance with the European Society for Opinion
and Market Research code. Respondents were selected according to
stratified quotas for gender, age, residency, formal education, and income
to ensure representativeness. The final data was then weighted to exactly
match the quotas. The margin of error was 3.1 percent. Polling in autocracies
always comes with difficulties, as respondents may not feel like they can
freely express their views. The results from China in particular should
therefore be interpreted with caution.
Following last year’s record-high threat perceptions, the MSI 2024 registers
aggregate decreases in 21 risk indicators, while ten indicators saw overall
increases (Figure 1.6). Almost all indicators related to Russia’s war on
Ukraine have fallen, including the use of nuclear weapons by an aggressor
and energy supply disruptions. While Russia was still the top risk for five G7
countries last year, only the citizens of the UK and Japan still consider it so.
German citizens now only see Russia as the seventh greatest concern and
Italians see it as the 12th. Other prominent risks have fallen, too. Strikingly,
2
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y I N D E X
citizens in all but three countries – Brazil, Japan, and South Africa – have
lesser economic anxieties than last year. And both the perceived risk of
Covid-19 specifically and a future pandemic generally have dropped.
Russia’s war and the wider geopolitical competition still shape citizens’
views of other countries, but less intensely than last year. Belarus, China,
Iran, and Russia are the only countries that are seen more as threats than
as allies in aggregate (Figure 1.9). After Russia’s standing plummeted last
year, it has modestly recovered in all countries except Japan, but it remains
very low. China, India, and South Africa still consider Russia more an ally
than a threat, with Brazil undecided, which stands in marked contrast to
views among citizens in the G7 countries. Five of the G7 countries have a
more favorable view of China than last year, with Canada and Japan being
the exceptions. Strikingly, China sees all countries except Russia and
Belarus as more threatening than last year. It is also the only country that
sees the US as a threat, if by a fine margin. Ukraine, which enjoyed the
greatest increase in last year’s index, is still considered an ally by all states,
in particular the G7 countries, but to a lesser extent than last year.
Thus, the Munich Security Index 2024 signals a moderation, but not a rupture,
of the post-Russian-invasion trends (Figure 1.7). Traditional hard security
threats appear to have peaked in 2022, but they remain higher than in 2021.
Among the G7 countries, the threat of Russia, for instance, rose from being
the 15th greatest concern in 2021, to the top concern in 2022, and dropped to
fourth in 2023. The risk of nuclear aggression follows a similar pattern. In the Munich Security
Index
BICS countries, risk perceptions have been less volatile since 2021, suggesting
that citizens see Russia’s war to be less of a turning point (Figure 1.8). The fact powered by
that perceptions of Iran and Russia have remained static, and views of China
have even improved, also contrasts markedly with views in the G7 countries.
3
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
Index scores To produce the final risk index score for each risk in each country we add the
mean scores for all five of the inputs above – overall risk, trajectory,
severity, imminence, and preparedness. The resulting total is then rescaled to
run from 0 to 100 for ease of interpretation. The final risk index score is an
absolute figure (with 100 the highest and 0 the lowest possible risk index
score) that can be compared between demographics, countries, and over time.
4
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y I N D E X
rescaled
+ reversed
reversed
Mean
scores 0 – 10 + 0 – 10 + 0 – 10 + 0 – 10 + 0 – 10
added
0 – 50
rescaled
0 – 100
0 – 10 11 – 20 21 – 30 31 – 40 41 – 50 51 – 60 61 – 70 71 – 80 81 – 90 91 – 100
Besides a risk heatmap (page 6) that features the G7 countries, Brazil, China,
India, and South Africa and how they score on each of the 32 risks covered,
the index also includes an overview of how risk perceptions have changed
over time (pages 7–9) as well as an overview of how countries perceive other
states (page 21).
The index also provides more detailed insights into the individual risk Country profiles
profiles of the countries surveyed (pages 10–20).
5
6
34
Figure 1.5
The risk heatmap, October–November 2023, score
r
e s so
g es
an i on gr
ch ut ag
e s tit r a n
rt y at s in o
n im ie d or r y ss by ce
cou r cl e m an ress unt g re ns en
o g re
s g ltu
s o ur ar o n en er agg co n
a ois elli
t u
re m w y a p n c
t fi
ts i n y f w
o ry at
io e ro e p o an m y nd al i ’s
i ta nt sf tr y ic
res lly ab risis ult u n m
in crim n e nc tern by y in n s b s a fici
i n
co t io c a ig i p o on rt ou em
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
d
fo ra l h l c res ism
e a r r i s
ri ed
p v
ol es ons rac
c a p /a c d
n n ur cia a ro u up n iz m l W p o e e a ts y m n
r a ge at an as ter y yo sr tio r d an ica st ea m ic l w w o m is pa
n
ca s to rror us n
t he ge of n fin ion ic alit on y
di iza the org
r e o lit ong r w f de em ica cal rob e ir s io
ea han on or rat lam qu cks p pl ola d o nal a t i o ta g
r o r p m lea o nd log mi us
a c n a e o r s re a nge g t av ate Un
n t
e
w c ti su p an io u p io a n n
i c i g I s i n e tt a
y cal m at rm o ar ns f n dow re f b f ch om wa Ko ch -wi oro d S ea
m te uc om m al g ra a fo sh w io u n t c p
t re ima estr on ass dic sin be ssi erg liti cis tern ina isin od n vil ivis se o eak fut se o se o to ade orth pid igh he nite uro
Ex Cl D Ec M Ra Ri Cy Ru En Po Ra In Ch D Fo Ira Ci D U Br A U U Au Tr N Ra R T U E
Brazil 80 79 79 69 60 53 71 66 51 52 69 65 64 47 69 58 47 62 59 56 56 61 56 56 57 54 41 47 41 47 39 34
South Africa 73 73 71 83 62 42 75 66 51 90 68 71 65 48 62 78 40 66 61 53 67 56 53 54 55 54 37 56 45 42 47 41
Italy 78 75 73 66 67 67 64 64 59 44 48 62 62 50 60 42 59 45 55 51 39 48 52 52 49 53 41 38 37 33 30 26
Japan 68 70 68 61 55 52 65 72 74 62 45 46 61 73 61 57 52 47 45 66 43 57 63 62 51 54 69 42 44 48 33 27
France 69 69 65 62 71 80 64 65 66 59 52 66 55 54 60 51 64 60 58 53 48 52 54 54 49 53 46 49 49 41 21 19
Germany 66 63 68 63 80 74 68 70 67 48 64 62 69 57 61 41 60 52 60 55 42 44 53 53 55 51 41 52 57 31 28 23
Canada 68 62 66 62 57 56 53 63 64 48 54 51 52 62 61 54 56 44 50 54 40 49 52 52 55 46 47 46 48 39 22 15
United Kingdom 60 61 62 58 60 59 54 61 66 55 49 51 54 56 55 48 55 41 48 51 39 46 51 51 53 39 44 42 45 32 16 15
United States 57 50 56 61 56 58 48 65 62 54 64 49 49 63 61 49 61 54 52 53 56 45 53 52 52 47 49 53 41 35 22
India 48 54 50 37 40 46 40 50 18 36 47 41 42 47 47 34 23 41 40 42 34 41 42 42 42 38 22 39 40 33 18 15
China 40 42 38 32 29 30 33 42 18 23 29 29 34 40 20 18 24 32 39 18 35 41 36 34 39 16 28 29 33 42 31
In the United States and China, citizens were not asked to assess the risk from their own country.
0 – 10 11 – 20 21 – 30 31 – 40 41 – 50 51 – 60 61 – 70 71 – 80 81 – 90 91 – 100
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
Figure 1.6
The change heatmap, October–November 2023, change in index score since October–November 2022
r
e s so
ng es
a ti on gr
ch i tu ag
e t r an
e at i ns tr y o y
nc lim i d es ry un ss sb or
e c m re an nt co g re n e ss
g or e u s u g o g r
lli er co ur a is
te ar s en ult
w y yo an po ag
l in e f w fi re tion om ’s c y ts p o m n y d a n
a r y r a ce i n
cia im o st in s f ntr nt bit rn y in s sb sa by ic
tifi cr ult re n u a e l en y isi
e d res fo crim aig cou r co l h est ral i ol rac l cr p on ion
t p on o ns d em
r ism /ar a n l v o c ia e a p a p
rro ts iz a m and dis mp y ou ur t W ene
an s ris r a m y at s g io ca m nc w ru ic we ea an
te bo n z at l u sp
o rg n a rro her the n c to on f n ng ge o i o a
i t i l i ty d e n a
f fi i cal dis em al es r w
ly d i c g a i r
ic s ro l ar g av
am u na ra g
tio te eat d o tio ge ks n o mo an tes Uni a
a n c a e ol r p qu n o or s lo pp an em rta cle
l Isl mo t io ig in e w an rm cha tta ctio ns e ch Sta an Kor al p a r o ine ow mic ar bio su re p ch ho nu ron
o na m t- w w
ca n m m fo d ra ru io at ed pe h ic a w g kd o e of gy u of od s e of ssia e co
di to n ter ass gh tre cis isin pi be est ivis im nit ro ort lit in vil sin ea on ad se er fut se s u h
Ra Au Ira In M Ri Ex Ra D Ra Cy D D Cl U Eu N Po Ch Ci Ri Br Ec Tr U En A U Fo U R T
Germany +13 +10 +4 +2 +5 +5 -7 +3 +0 +5 -4 -5 +2 -7 -3 -1 -1 +2 -6 +1 -6 -1 -12 -9 -9 -20 -6 -9 -15 -10 -11 -11
South Africa +0 +8 +1 +0 +1 +0 +3 -3 +2 -3 +0 +1 +3 +1 +5 +3 -2 -2 -6 -2 -1 -2 +2 +0 -1 -1 -5 -2 +1 -3 -6 -7
India -2 -1 -6 -1 -1 -6 +1 -3 +0 -1 +0 +1 -2 +1 -8 -10 -8 -2 -4 -2 -5 -5 -8 -4 -5 -6 -4 -5 -5 -8 -9 -9
China -7 -5 -14 -6 -11 -10 -6 -9 -4 -11 -3 -6 -8 -5 -4 -9 -14 -10 -14 -7 -17 -9 -5 -5 -15 -13 -8 -16 -8 -15 -18
In the United States and China, citizens were not asked to assess the risk from their own country.
-25 – -21 -20 – -16 -15 – -11 -10 – -6 -5 – -1 +0 – +5 +6 – +10 +11 – +15 +16 – +20
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y I N D E X
35
7
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
8
36
Figure 1.7 The G7 risk bump chart, aggregate ranking of risks by the G7 countries, 2021−2023
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference -21--25 -11--20 -1--10 +0 +1-+10 +11-+20 +21-+25
Figure 1.8 The “BICS” risk bump chart, aggregate ranking of risks by Brazil, China, India, and South Africa, 2021−2023
379
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference -21--25 -11--20 -1--10 +0 +1-+10 +11-+20 +21-+25
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
Canada
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Extreme weather 68 +0 67 28
and forest fires 1 Like several other
Destruction of natural habitats 66 -2 65 27 countries, Canada has
seen a considerable increase
Russia 64 -5 63 39 in its level of concern
about radical Islamic
Cyberattacks on your country 63 +2 65 25
terrorism. Since last year,
Climate change generally 62 -3 62 29 the risk has climbed from
Economic or financial crisis
26th place to tenth place.
62 -5 66 29 Despite this, Canada has a
in your country
China 62 +2 56 37 relatively low level of overall
concern on this issue –
Disinformation campaigns
from enemies
61 +4 67 25 among the G7, it is only more
Mass migration as a result of concerned than Japan.
57 +3 56 28
war or climate change
Radical Islamic terrorism 56 +13 50 27 2 Canadian concern about
the threat posed by
Iran 56 +5 51 33
autonomous robots and
Autonomous robots/
55 +13 45 26 artificial intelligence has
artificial intelligence
Use of nuclear weapons
also seen a striking increase,
54 -3 47 42 up from 28th place to
by an aggressor
Political polarization 54 -1 61 24
12th place of 32 risks
surveyed. Among
Food shortages 54 -4 60 29 respondents from G7
countries, Canadians
Rising inequality 53 +0 62 24
(and Germans) are the
Use of biological weapons
52 -3 49 44 most concerned.
by an aggressor
Use of chemical weapons and
52 -2 46 44
poisons by an aggressor 3 Canadian concerns about
International organized crime 52 +1 56 26 the impact of the Russian
invasion of Ukraine have
Racism and
other discrimination 51 +2 64 20 declined over the last year.
Divisions amongst Western Energy supply disruption
50 +2 48 26
powers and institutions has also dropped in the risk
A future pandemic 49 -2 54 21 ranking, from 15th place
to 24th place.
Right-wing terrorism 48 +3 52 26
North Korea 47 +1 42 35
Rapid change
46 +5 42 26
to my country’s culture
Trade wars 46 +0 51 23
38
10
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y I N D E X
France
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Right-wing terrorism 49 +4 52 19
Autonomous robots/
49 +7 44 20
artificial intelligence
Rapid change to
49 +2 41 27
my country’s culture
Breakdown of democracy
48 +0 42 28
in my country
North Korea 46 +0 39 25
39
11
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
Germany
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Mass migration as a result
of war or climate change 80 +5 70 39 1 Russia, last year rated as
Radical Islamic terrorism 74 +13 67 31 Germany’s most serious
threat, has fallen by 11 index
Cyberattacks on your country 70 -4 74 36 points and is now ranked the
seventh most serious threat.
International organized crime 69 +2 72 31
Germans are similarly less
Destruction of natural habitats 68 -5 68 37 concerned now about the
threats posed by nuclear,
Rising inequality 68 -6 71 39 chemical, and biological
Russia 67 -11 67 45 weapons, with each falling
by nine to ten index points.
Extreme weather and forest fires 66 -7 71 37
Political polarization 64 +2 68 27
2 Economic anxieties are also
weaker than they were this
Climate change generally 63 -7 64 35 time last year. The perceived
Economic or financial risk posed by an economic or
63 -12 72 36
crisis in your country financial crisis has fallen out
Racism and other
62 +3 68 27 of the top ten threats facing
discrimination
Disinformation campaigns
Germany – from third to
61 +0 69 29 11th place – while that of
from enemies
Divisions amongst Western
60 +2 56 33
energy supply disruption has
powers and institutions dropped dramatically from
Iran 60 +4 54 38 ninth to 25th place.
Right-wing terrorism 57 +5 64 25
3 As in many other countries,
China 57 -6 57 45 the Hamas terrorist attack on
Use of nuclear weapons October 7 appears to have
55 -10 51 54
by an aggressor prompted a spike in German
Autonomous robots/ 55 +10 51 31 concern about radical Islamic
artificial intelligence terrorism, which increased
Use of biological weapons
by an aggressor
53 -9 50 54 by 13 index points, climbing
Use of chemical weapons and from 16th place to second
53 -9 51 53
poisons by an aggressor place. Mass migration as a
Civil war or result of war and climate
52 +1 53 37
political violence
Rapid change change has increased by five
52 +5 50 33 index points to take first
to my country’s culture
Trade wars 51 -9 59 37 place. Germany now has the
highest level of concern about
Energy supply disruption 48 -20 67 39 mass migration among the
countries surveyed.
A future pandemic 44 -6 62 27
Breakdown of democracy
42 -1 36 40
in my country
Food shortages 41 -15 59 34
North Korea 41 -1 43 37
40
12
M
MUUN
NIIC
CHH SSECU
ECURRIIT
TYY IIN
NDDEEX
X
Italy
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Extreme weather 78 -4 73 37
and forest fires 1 Among the G7, Italians are
Climate change generally 75 -7 69 36 the most concerned about
the threat posed by climate
Destruction of natural habitats 73 -5 68 36 change, giving the issue an
index score of 75. Environmental
Radical Islamic terrorism 67 +19 54 27
issues – extreme weather and
Mass migration as a result of forest fires, the destruction
67 +4 61 35
war or climate change
Economic or financial crisis
of natural habitats, and climate
66 +10 71 35 change generally – make up
in your country
Cyberattacks on your country 64 -1 70 26 Italy’s top three threats, as
they did last year.
Rising inequality 64 -3 65 32
Iran 59 +8 50 35
3 Italy has seen a considerable
Divisions amongst Western 55 +0 58 28 increase in the level of
powers and institutions
concern about radical Islamic
Trade wars 53 -5 58 30 terrorism, increasing by 19
Use of biological weapons
52 -6 47 53
index points since last year
by an aggressor (the biggest increase seen
Use of chemical weapons and on any issue) and climbing
52 -6 47 52
poisons by an aggressor
Use of nuclear weapons from 22nd place to fourth
51 -9 48 53
by an aggressor place in Italy’s rankings.
China 50 +0 48 39
Autonomous robots/ 49 +9 46 27
artificial intelligence
A future pandemic 48 -3 54 21
Political polarization 48 +1 54 22
Food shortages 42 -9 48 34
North Korea 41 +2 40 34
Breakdown of democracy 39 +0 35 34
in my country
Rapid change to 38 +3 34 33
my country’s culture
Right-wing terrorism 37 +7 41 25
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
41
13
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
Japan
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Iran 52 +6 34 30
Autonomous robots/ 51 +3 44 22
artificial intelligence
The coronavirus pandemic 48 -10 68 16
Political polarization 45 +3 38 25
Divisions amongst Western 45 +4 31 24
powers and institutions
Right-wing terrorism 44 +6 31 26
Breakdown of democracy 43 +3 25 27
in my country
Rapid change to my country’s 42 +4 26 25
culture
74
United States 33 +2 22 25
is Japan’s risk index
European Union 27 +0 18 26 score for Russia
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
42
14
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y I N D E X
United Kingdom
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Right-wing terrorism 45 +0 56 17
North Korea 44 +0 43 22
Rapid change to
42 -2 46 25
my country’s culture
Civil war or political violence 41 -4 48 23
Breakdown of democracy 39 -10 47 29
in my country
Trade wars 39 -9 57 20
43
15
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
United States
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Cyberattacks on 65 +1 64 19
your country 1 Among US respondents,
Political polarization 64 +0 65 23 concern about political
polarization remains high,
China 63 +2 60 21 increasing two places
since last year to become
Russia 62 -4 62 22
the second-greatest
Disinformation campaigns 61 +1 65 19 perceived threat. This is
from enemies
Economic or financial crisis
the highest ranking for the
61 -5 64 27 risk of polarization among
in your country
Iran 61 +7 57 17 countries surveyed.
North Korea 49 -3 53 17
Rising inequality 48 -3 58 20
Trade wars 47 -2 56 18
A future pandemic 45 -7 54 19
Righ-wing terrorism 41 -5 53 18
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
44
16
M
MUUN
NIIC
CHH SSECU
ECURRIIT
TYY IIN
NDDEEX
X
Brazil
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Extreme weather
and forest fires 80 +9 66 34 1 Concern about the climate
Climate change generally 79 +8 66 33 and environmental threats
has been increasing among
Destruction of natural habitats 79 +8 64 34 Brazilians. The risk of extreme
weather and forest fires is up
Rising inequality 71 +4 63 34
nine points compared to last
Disinformation campaigns 69 +3 63 32 year, replacing climate change
from enemies
as the top perceived risk.
Political polarization 69 +0 68 29
Economic or financial crisis 69 +3 62 35 2 The risk of political
in your country
polarization is down two
Cyberattacks on your country 66 +5 57 35 places this year.
Racism and other discrimantion 65 +0 67 28
3 The risk posed by international
International organized crime 64 +9 52 38 organized crime is up five
Civil war or political violence 62 -2 60 34
places since last year, now
ranked 10th overall. The risk
A future pandemic 61 +2 54 30 posed by autonomous robots
Mass migration as a result of and artificial intelligence has
60 +5 57 27
war or climate change jumped up eight places,
Divisions amongst Western 59 +3 55 27 consistent with an upward
powers and institutions
trend among all countries
Food shortages 58 +1 51 35 surveyed.
Autonomous robots/
57 +11 49 35
artificial intelligence
Use of nuclear weapons 56 +3 44 52
by an aggressor
Use of biological weapons 56 +3 43 52
by an aggressor
Use of chemical weapons 56 +3 43 51
and poisons by an aggressor
Breakdown of democracy
56 -2 51 34
in my country
Trade wars 54 +1 56 29
Russia 51 +3 45 42
Iran 47 +10 36 37
Right-wing terrorism 41 -2 46 37
North Korea 41 +5 35 38
is the index score
increase of the
+9
United States 39 +5 37 36
perceived risk of
European Union 34 +3 36 34 extreme weather
and forest fires
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
45
17
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
China
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Rising inequality 33 -7 41 6
Divisions amongst Western
32 -8 41 5
powers and institutions
Economic or financial crisis 32 -9 40 5
in your country
European Union 31 -9 41 9
Russia 18 -15 35 11
Iran 18 -14 34 10
3rd is the ranking
of the threat posed
North Korea 16 -14 32 11
place by the US
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
46
18
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y I N D E X
India
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
Trade wars 38 -4 45 13
Economic or financial crisis
in your country 37 -8 48 12
Foot shortages 34 -5 43 12
Iran 23 -6 33 13
North Korea 22 -8 35 11
Russia 18 -9 36 13
is the share of
10%
United States 18 -8 32 11 respondents who feel
unprepared for the
European Union 15 -10 32 13
threat posed by China
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
47
19
M U N I C H S ECU R I T Y R E P O RT 2 0 2 4
South Africa
Index score Change in Share thinking Share feeling
index score risk is imminent unprepared
China 48 -6 47 43
United States 47 +5 39 40
Right-wing terrorism 45 +0 43 34
European Union 41 +3 36 39
is the South African
90
Iran 40 +1 40 41 risk index score
for energy supply
North Korea 37 -2 35 43
disruption
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference
48
20
Figure 1.9
Citizens’ perceptions of other countries, share saying country is an ally minus share saying country is a threat,
October–November 2023, percent
om
gd a es
y i n o re tat ica
n a l a K d n e i a a K S v a Afr ry s
a i d d n i ru i a
n ce rm y
l a n ad stra ite lan ede lan zil iwa rain an org ton uth ited ldo uth ael ia nga rkey ina n
u ra p e n o r h e l a u ss
ra e ta
F G I
n in w o
C A U F S P B T U J a k a s o
G E S U M S I o s I n d u u
H T C I ra B R
Ukraine 83 85 80 89 72 87 80 78 87 28 45 70 57 82 36 90 62 -1 56 19 -14 39 -33 -62 -76 -96
India 40 38 32 23 37 37 31 32 31 36 27 22 39 26 19 35 41 26 37 28 26 19 -9 8 24 34
China 27 24 30 19 17 14 30 31 22 43 19 -2 28 33 14 -1 33 40 14 12 34 32 38 49 59
Brazil 26 25 27 26 25 28 18 12 15 10 13 28 7 9 18 38 4 24 21 13 11 7 17 -12 -3 -1
South Africa 20 18 16 22 24 25 18 20 13 29 11 8 28 8 6 8 15 6 7 27 11 15 27 -2 6 16
M
MUUN
NIIC
CHH SSECU
ECURRIIT
TYY IIN
-100 – -61 -60 – -51 -50 – -41 -40 – -31 -30 – -21 -20 – -11 -10 – -1 0 – 10 11 – 20 21 – 30 31 – 40 41 – 50 51 – 60 61 – 70 71 – 80 81 – 90
NDDEEX
49
X
21
Data and illustration: Kekst CNC, commissioned by the Munich Security Conference