Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCHOOL OF CRIMINOLOGY
Overview:
Methods of recognition, development and proper preservation of latent prints
Methods in comparison
Different principles, jurisprudence and related laws in the application of the Fingerprint
Identification Technique
Introduction:
Evidence is vital in every case presented in court. Evidence can be anything associated
with a crime scene that may determine innocence or guilt in a court of law. It can determine
whether a crime occurred or not.
Fingerprint, before it will be presented as evidence, must undergo process of development,
preservation and analysis. Latent fingerprints are compared with known fingerprints. It is done to
show the similarities between two prints in order to prove the identity or did it originate from a
common source. It is very crucial that the evidence will be accepted or else everything will just
be futile. That is why fingerprint experts adhered properly to principles and methods, especially
in handling such evidence.
Learning Outcomes:
a. Explain the methods of recognition, development and the proper preservation of latent prints
b. Understand the method in comparison
c. Discuss different principles, jurisprudence and related laws in the application of the
Fingerprint Identification Technique
Learning Objectives:
1|P age
CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION
a forensic analysis of the location and circumstances surrounding a crime.
It comprises gathering investigative, forensic, and physical evidence to link a
sequence of events to reconstruct the crime scene.
Once the area of interest has been identified, a visual examination of the surface is the
first step in fingerprint processing.
Oblique lighting can be used to visualize fingerprint that may not be clearly visible in
daylight or direct white light.
If fingerprints are observed, they are photographed in situ (in place)
When all visible fingerprints are recorded, the surfaced is processed for fingerprints using
the appropriate processing technique.
1. Ink roller – refers to an instrument used for spreading the ink into the slab.
2. Ink slab – refers to a piece of metal or a plane glass with as much as ¼ inch thick and 6 or
more inches long where the fingerprint ink is distributed for fingerprinting.
2|P age
5. Magnifying glass – used in examining developed latent prints. A 3-inch wide reading glass
is required.
1. Linen tester – has an opening one-inch square, with fixed focus, and which can be
folded and carried in the pocket when necessary.
2. Bausch and Lomb magnifier – also known as “Horse-shoe magnifier.” A magnifying
glass with a built-in stand and an adjustable lens to suit the visual sight of the
examiner.
3. Hand lens – used in examining developed print.
6. Fingerprint powder – refers to the powder used in developing latent prints found in the
scene of crime; They are normally found in two: the black and the white or gray, which is
applied depending upon the contrasting background.
7. Fingerprint brushes – refers to an instrument used for powdering latent prints. There are
three variations of brushes used: the fiberglass, magnetic and feather type. Appear in
various design.
3|P age
8. Fingerprint lifting tapes – It refers to tapes used for
lifting of developed latent prints which is quite
harder than an ordinary tape. It has three varieties:
frosted, rubber and transparent.
10. Fingerprint card – Refers to a piece of card used for recording the ten fingerprints for
comparison.
11. Flashlight – refers to a device used for searching and focusing on developed latent prints.
4|P age
14. Graph paper – used for sketching purposes to indicate proper locations and measurements
of objects in the crime scene.
15. Evidence identification tape or tag – used to properly identify objects or physical evidence
gathered from the crime scene.
16. Pair of Scissors – used in cutting fingerprint tapes and for other purposes.
17. Rubber gloves – used primarily to avoid the technician to leave his own fingerprints in the
object being collected or examined.
5|P age
20. Inkless inking device – a porelon pad, sensitized fingerprint cards that is used to record
fingerprints without staining the fingers.
21. Ridge counter – next to magnifier, this is a tool most utilized by a latent print examiner
for identification of fingerprints characteristics.
6|P age
4. To check whether or not the ink was spread properly or whether it is enough or not, try to
print one of your finger or put the slab near the light and if brownish reflection is observe
it means you have a good ink for used.
5. Place the fingerprint card on the cardholder properly to ensure that proper entry will be
easy.
6. Check the hands of the subject: Make sure that it is clean and dry. If it is perspiring freely,
wipe them off with a soft, clean cloth dampened with alcohol.
7. The technician should stand at the left of the subject in taking fingerprint.
8. Subject should be instructed to stand straight but relax and not to assist the technician in
rolling his finger. Subject should be standing not too close or too far facing the ink slab.
9. In taking the rolled impression, technician should place first the right thumb to be rolled
towards the body of the subject. Then ink the remaining fingers (index, middle, ring and
little finger) and rolled it away from the body of the subject. Roll the thumb and fingers
from tip to tip.
10. The same should be done in the left hand.
11. Apply only moderate amount of pressure in printing subjects’ fingers to avoid blurred
prints but hold the subject hand firmly so as to prevent pulling that may cause smeared
impression.
12. To obtain the plain impression, all the fingers and thumb should be pressed lightly upon
the inking plate, then press simultaneously on the space in the fingerprint card.
1. A penetration of a depth of more than one millimeter is necessary where the organs or
process responsible for the growth of ridge elements are damaged or interrupted in their
activities.
2. Due to the destruction of these organs and deprivation of the power to produce new ridge
elements, the process of fission is affected.
3. Because of the extensive damage the skin is rendered incapable to fusing.
Skin deformities sometimes prevent correct pattern interpretation and classification but in
totality do not prevent identification. As long as the pattern is not totally disfigured
classification can still be worked out.
7|P age
COMMON ERRORS IN RECORDING FINGERPRINTS
1. Dusting Method – is done with the use of fingerprint brush and powder by applying amount
of powder that is lightly swept on the suspected area to little by little reveal the print caused
by the powder.
This is called as the “brush on” or “powder” method.
3. The Spray Method - The powder is put into an empty container specially designed for
spraying.
- Suspected areas where fingerprints are suspected to be present are sprayed to let latent
print appear.
8|P age
POROUS, NON-POROUS & SEMIPOROUS SUBSTRATES
FINGERPRINT POWDERS
9|P age
2. Photograph any visible prints in situ (in place).
3. Pick a color powder that contrasts with the surface.
4. Put a light layer of powder onto a fingerprint brush and shake off the excess
5. Lightly pass the brush over the surface until friction ridges are visualized.
6. Photograph the visible fingerprints.
7. Lift the fingerprints onto a contrasting fingerprint card using fingerprint lift tape.
8. Fill out all known case info, completer a sketch, and note the “up” direction of the print.
Preparation:
Solution A – 100 ml Ethanol consist of 0.5 ml of TMB powder solution
Solution B – Ethanol added to the same amount of distilled water, and 30% peroxide
mixed up in 9:1 ratio.
4. NEO SPWA METHOD – This was invented by Nobuo Yamauchi, a Japanese Fingerprint
Expert, who authored a book entitled “Fingerprints Identifications.” This method is applied
on wet surfaces (plastic bag, metal product, plastic product, vehicle body, bathroom tiles,
weekly magazine cover, glass product, smooth surface with no water absorbent), adherent
surface of adhesive tape, the magnetic card and crappy plastic bag.
o Method of preparation: Few drops of Isopropyl alcohol (70% alcohol content) added
to 1 gram of black powder. Add 7 – 10 ml of water and mix well.
o Method of use: Dip brush on the reagent and brush it over the suspected surface.
Leave for 30 seconds and wash away excess powder. When prints are detected,
photograph it.
Procedure:
o Before starting to work on the suspected area, take a photograph to record the original
appearance.
o Apply solution A using a brush, then solution B after it dries.
o If there is an existing blood-stained fingerprint, it will turn into blue green color.
o Photograph such print.
5. VICTORIA PURE BLUE METHOD – This is used to detect latent prints on leaves,
scotch tape, and masking tape.
10 | P a g e
o Preparation: 1 gram of Victoria pure blue mix with 1 liter of ordinary water to make
0.1% of Victoria pure blue solution.
Procedure: Dip or soak the suspected object in a tray containing the solution for 30
seconds to one minute and observe how the prints appears, then wash it with water.
Photograph the developed print. The developed print can remain for several months and
years depending on its preservation.
6. EMULGEN BLACK.
- Used to develop latent prints on Glass, plastics, tin cans, metals, smooth surfaces of
cars, doorknobs, etc.
GAS METHOD
FINGERPRINT COMPARISONS
The purpose of processing latent fingerprints and collecting the known fingerprints is to
compare one to the other to determine whether they come from a common source.
A comparison of fingerprints can lead to one of three conclusions: an exclusion,
identification, or inconclusive result.
11 | P a g e
Level two detail – refers to the minutiae within the pattern. An analysis of the level two
details includes not only the types of minutiae but also the relative positions of the
minutiae along the friction ridges.
Level three detail – refers to the minute features and dimensions of the friction ridges. It
is an examination of the shapes, sizes, and relative positions of the pores along the ridge,
as well as the examination of the edge shapes and widths.
1. Recognition – This includes processing of latent prints in the crime scene, preliminary
screening, photography and lifting of the prints.
2. Identification – includes laboratory processing, enhancement, comparison of known and
unknown prints.
3. Individualization – includes the method of matching the prints for identification purposes
followed by evaluation.
4. Reconstruction – this will be done if there was non-matching of prints. The condition and
position should be identified and the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS)
may be used.
12 | P a g e
3. Thenar – is the portion of the palm at the base of the thumb
DOCUMENTATION
Each step in the process is recorded in detail, along with a detailed description of the item
itself. Any authorized personnel involved with the case should be able to understand
exactly what was done and how the photographs can be accessed. The following is an
example of fingerprint comparison notes written in an outline form.
13 | P a g e
Case #2021-01487 was received on January 21, 2021, at 0800h from the evidence
storage facility. Fingerprint comparisons were completed on the same date.
o Latent fingerprint L001 is sufficient for comparison purposes.
o Latent fingerprints L002 and L003 are of poor quality and are not sufficient
for comparison purposes.
o L001 was compared to the victim (Jane Doe, dob July 06, 1994) with negative
results.
o L001 was compares to the suspect (John Smith, dob September 15, 1990).
o L001 was identified as originating from the #1 finger of the suspect.
o The identification (ID) was verified by Juan Dela Cruz on January 26 2021.
FINAL REPORTS
A final report is a summary of all the work done on a case and the implications of
forensic analyses.
A final report is written as narrative, like an essay.
It is the last step in the documentation process, unless court demonstrations are created
at a later date.
Photos and notes can be used to write a detailed, thorough final report.
In order to write an unbiased, scientific narrative of a case, the report must be:
o Objective
o Clear and concise
o Organized
o Thorough
o Written in accordance with your agency/department SOP’s
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
The chain of custody accounts for an item of evidence from the time it is collected until it
is destroyed or stored at the conclusion of the case.
When an item of evidence is collected, a chain of custody form is attached to the evidence
packaging.
The chain of custody is a critical document that must always remain with the evidence.
BIOMETRICS
LIVESCAN AND AFIS
Biometrics from the root words (“bio” meaning life and “metric” meaning measure) refers to
using unique biological measurements or features to identify individuals.
14 | P a g e
Anthropology
DNA
Examples of modern digital biometrics
Iris scan
Retinal scans
Facial recognition
Voiceprint identification
Gait pattern
Hand geometry
Vascular patterns
History of AFIS
The current, efficient use of fingerprints as biometrics is only possible due to the advent
of the silicone microchip, and consequently the computer, in the early 1970’s.
The FBI’s identification bureau, known as the Identification Division, was established in
1924 “to provide a central repository of criminal identification data for law enforcement agencies.
The original collection of fingerprint records contained 810,188 records.”
The technicians employed in the Identification Division were responsible for classifying,
filing, and searching approximately 30,000 ten print cards submitted by law enforcement agencies
around the country every day.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police – put a system into place in 1977.
The city of San Francisco was the first jurisdiction to use the AFIS on a routine basis in
the United States.
It was installed in San Francisco in 1983, and a new unit called Crime Scene
Investigations, was formed.
1992 – IAFIS imported 32 million fingerprint cards into its database.
1997 – the United Kingdom installed its own national AFIS database.
LIVESCAN – this device scan and digitizes fingerprints similar to a document scanner. This
method does not require ink, powder or any other medium to capture the print.
- The livescan operator, the individual taking the fingerprints, rolls the individual’s
fingerprints onto a plastic or glass plate in a manner similar to rolling inked prints onto a
ten-print card.
- The livescan acquires the image and the computer processes it using a computer
algorithm: a set of procedures the computer follows to process data.
Livescan fingerprinting has several advantages over and is quickly replacing inked fingerprinting
for the following purposes:
1. Livescan prints are digital and can be stored on computers rather than in large numbers of
file cabinets required by manual ten prints cards.
2. Unlimited numbers of exact copies of the fingerprints can be reproduced on the computer
printer.
3. Livescan prints can be instantly transmitted between agencies using computer networks.
4. Image quality is more uniform due to the quality control standards built into the livescan
device.
15 | P a g e
5. Livescan devices directly connect to AFIS. This makes it possible to take a person’s prints;
search them automatically against local, and national records; and get results back, often
in minutes.
A. What is an Expert Witness? An expert is any person who is skilled in a specific trade, science
or occupation. Because of this particular knowledge, the expert is qualified to analyze or
compare a stated set of facts and to give an opinion based on those facts. This opinion is
admissible because this special knowledge is not often possessed by laymen.
B. Knowledge of the Fingerprint Expert – the expert must be knowledgeable in the following
areas: Fingerprint History, Fingerprint Classification, Latent Print Development
Procedures, Scientific Publications and Evidence Examination.
C. The Examiner have developed a “work sheet” that serves as a record of the investigation.
D. Appearance of the Witness – the appearance and clothing of the expert witness are important
factors in the process of “selling yourself” to the jury. Sometimes these non-verbal forms of
communication are as important as the factors of the case. Wearing of complete uniform is
desirable.
E. Delivery – After being sworn in, sit or stand confidently. Do not slouch in the seat. Keep both
feet on the floor and sit toward the front edge of the chair. Keep your hands folded on your
lap until it becomes necessary to handle reports, evidence, etc.
a. Avoid technical jargon unfamiliar to laymen. Use easy to understand language. Speak in
first person.
b. Address your answer to the jury. Eye contact with each juror at some point during
testimony is important.
c. Always pause after hearing a question from the defense attorney to allow time for the
prosecutor to offer any objection.
d. When introducing your display, make every effort to tie each new point mentioned to a
previous one like “point number three is a bifurcation and is six ridges to the left of point
number two.”
F. Conclusion – Once earned, the professional status of a fingerprint expert demands
preservations. It is a standard of excellence by which you and your peers are judged. To
preserve the status of expert witness, you should continue to study and use the latest
technology available. You, as a latent fingerprint expert, perform a vital service while also
maintaining and enhancing a priceless heritage.
16 | P a g e
FIRST CONVICTION IN U.S.A.
PEOPLE vs JENNINGS
In 1911 the Illinois Police Department arrested a man named Thomas Jennings for murder. The
evidence against Jennings was slim except for fingerprint evidence. The prosecution wanted to
ensure the fingerprint evidence would be admitted before the Illinois Supreme Court.
LAMBLE VS STATE (Lamble vs. State, 96 N.T.L., 231; 114 ATL., (N.J.) 364 (1921)
- This involved the discovery of fingerprints on the door of an automobile, the court believed it
was not necessary to produce the door as an evidence. The court stated that a photograph of the
fingerprints noted on the door should be sufficient along with the identification of the fingerprints
by expert to show of these of the defendant. The court referred to the previous decided case in
State vs. Conners (Supra)
PHILIPPINES
BINGALAWA VS AMADOR (CA, 36320-B)
The fingerprint expert and constabulary sergeant/ investigator testified and successfully
defended fingerprint evidence based on eight (8) identical ridge points.
The court stated that admissibility was based on rare identical characteristics compared
from both true and questioned prints.
17 | P a g e
PP VS MEDINA (59 PHIL. 330)
The first leading judicial decision in Philippine Jurisprudence on the Science of
Fingerprinting.
On the night of February 12, 1932, Mariano Medina broke into and entered through the
window of the house of Mr. James C. Rockwell. Once inside, Medina took several
properties of the Rockwell’s and one among them was a jewelry box, which was later on
recovered by the intelligence division of the Philippine Constabulary, Officer Agripino
Ruiz. The latter was able to develop and lift a fingerprint on top of the box. Ruiz took the
fingerprints of the accused and found similarities when he compared them with his
records. Further investigation revealed that the accused had served three terms in the
Bilibid prison.
Ruiz then compared a photograph of the impression of the middle finger of Medina’s right
hand with the photograph fingerprint on top of the box stolen from the bedroom of the
Rockwell’s and established that they coincided in ten (10) points. He concluded that the
two (2) impressions were from the same person.
18 | P a g e