Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Conventional protection coordination approach
The maximum PSQ pre-fault current
Transformer
SBDER
DER
I H0
Distributed
converter
VE I E0 Z1u VH
DC link
Output
resources
G UL
filter
Microgrid
energy
Unbalanced
VSC
control loads
center
(a) The studied system. (b) The PSQ equivalent circuit for prefault situation.
L J
R5 R 6 S3
H. Muda and P. Jena, "Sequence IBDER Currents based adaptive protection approach for
distribution networksUL with distributed generation" IET Generation Transmission and
Distribution, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 154-165, 2017
4
The PSQ Prefault Current at the Relay Bus-G
The voltage equations
VE I EO (Z1p Zu ) I HO Zu 0
I HO (Z1q Zu ) VH I EO Zu 0
The PSQ Prefault Current at the Relay Bus-G
Z1u Z1p Z1u
I1pre VE VH I H0
Z1pq Z1pq
I1E I1H
I1pre is depended upon Z1u of the DN.
5
PSQ Fault Current for Fault at F1 Point
• Voltage equations E G H H
R3 F1 R4 S2
F2 AC
VE I E Z1r IG ZF 0 Grid
S DC
Transformer
DER
SBDER
converter
Output
I G Z1s Z1U EI E Z F I H Z1U 0 G UL
filter
Microgrid
Unbalanced
VSC
S1 R1 R2 control loads
Grid
I H Z1U Z1q VH I G Z1U 0 center
E UL UL H
G J
Z1E Z1EF F1 Z1FG I1F1 Z1GH ZR
1H5 R6 S3
IBDER
I1a I1LF UL
VE IE ZF IG Z1U I H VH
6
PSQ Fault Current for Fault at F1 Point
Z1U Z F Z1qrs Z1U Z1U Z1r
I1F1 VE VH I H
Z1qrs Z1qrs (Z1U Z1q )
I1EF I1HF
•The I1EF and -I1HF PSQ fault currents contributed by the grid and DER respectively, at the relay
location during the fault at F1 side.
•PSQ Fault Current for Fault at F2 Point
E G H
Z1E Z1EG I1F2 Z1GF F2 1FH
Z Z1H
'
I1LF I1a'
VE I E' '
Z1U I G' Z F' I H' VH
7
PSQ Fault Current for Fault at F2 Point
The voltage equations
VE I E (Z1p Zu ) I G
Z1U
0
I G Z1U
Z1r I H Z F I E Z1U
0
Z1s
I H VH I G
Z F 0
A superimposed component
I1F I1F I1pre
8
Fault direction estimation using superimposed currents
I1pre
I1pre
I1F1 I1F2 I1F1 I1F2
I1pre
I1pre
F 1 I1F1 F1 II1F1 I1F2F 1 I1F1
F 1 I II1F1 1F1 I1F1
I1F2 I
F 1IF
1pre1F1
1 I1F1 VE F1F 2I1F1 F 1 F 1 V
I1pre VE F 2 1F1
I1pre
VH I1F1
F 2 F 2
I1preE V E2 F 2
VH VHV
I1F2 I1pre F
VEV
I1F2 I1F2 I I1F2 I
F 2FV21F2 VH V 1pre I E
I1F2 I
I1F2
1F1
E
FH2I1F2
1F1
VH V
I1F2 I(a) I1F2 I1F2
(b) I1F1
(a) (b) 1F2
I1F2 I1F2
E
(a) (b)
Phasor diagrams (a) (b)
(a) For downstream power flow condition. (b) For upstream power flow condition. (a)
9
Rule base for directional element
10
Description of the proposed protection approach
Start
11
Simulation results for 4-bus distribution network
H
R3 F2 R4 S3
4.25 km SBDER1
E G ULH
S1 R1 F1 R2
Grid
3.5 km
ULE ULG J
R5 F3 R6 S2
2.2 km SBDER2
ULJ
12
Results for Grid-connected mode of operation
Results of the calculation of fault currents, settings and time of operation of
DOCRs for grid connected mode
Adaptive approach Conventional approach
FP
PR/ f M p / bj
(j)
BR I cp / bj , I1cF / 2 Fij t1cF / 2 Fij , I cp / bj , I1cFij t1cF / 2 Fij ,
(i) TDS cp / bj CTI TDS cp / bj CTI
A A s A A s
R1 0.636 0.150 6.856 0.431 - 0.049 0.636 0.150 6.856 0.431 -
R2 0.608 0.050 1.842 0.312 - 0.022 0.608 0.050 1.842 0.312 -
F1
R4 0.252 0.142 1.245 0.613 0.301 0.032 0.437 0.142 2.058 0.631 0.319
R6 0.270 0.113 0.954 0.618 0.306 0.023 0.467 0.113 1.493 0.673 0.360
R4 0.437 0.142 2.872 0.518 - 0.038 0.437 0.142 2.872 0.518 -
R3 0.450 0.100 4.077 0.311 - 0.045 0.450 0.100 4.077 0.311 -
F2
R1 0.367 0.150 1.970 0.615 0.304 0.034 0.636 0.150 3.012 0.665 0.354
R6 0.270 0.113 0.959 0.616 0.305 0.026 0.467 0.113 1.466 0.684 0.373
R6 0.467 0.113 3.142 0.407 - 0.039 0.467 0.113 3.142 0.407 -
R5 0.477 0.100 3.952 0.324 - 0.043 0.477 0.100 3.952 0.324 -
F3
R1 0.367 0.150 1.762 0.659 0.335 0.032 0.636 0.150 2.694 0.717 0.393
R4 0.252 0.142 1.214 0.623 0.299 0.032 0.437 0.142 1.854 0.678 0.354
13
Results for Islanded mode of operation
Results of the calculation of fault currents, settings and time of operation of DOCRs
for islanded mode
Adaptive approach Conventional approach
PR/ f new
FP c
I new ,A
BR I1cF /2 Fij t1cF /2 Fij , I cp / bj , I1cFij t1cFij ,
M p / bj
c
TDS new
(j) _ p / bj CTI TDS cp / bj CTI
(i) _ p / bj
, A s A A s
R2 0.153 0.085 1.012 0.309 - 0.038 0.608 0.050 1.012 0.683 -
F1 R4 0.158 0.130 0.682 0.613 0.303 0.030 0.437 0.142 1.043 1.133 0.450
R6 0.189 0.119 0.728 0.612 0.302 0.027 0.467 0.113 1.114 0.902 0.219
R4 0.273 0.123 1.405 0.518 - 0.033 0.437 0.142 1.405 0.841 -
F2 R3 0.282 0.050 0.852 0.312 - 0.022 0.450 0.100 0.852 1.090 -
R6 0.189 0.122 0.744 0.616 0.303 0.028 0.467 0.113 1.138 0.880 -0.20
R6 0.328 0.119 2.418 0.407 - 0.041 0.467 0.113 2.418 0.473 -
F3 R5 0.334 0.063 1.278 0.324 - 0.027 0.477 0.100 1.278 0.703 -
R4 0.158 0.130 0.665 0.623 0.299 0.029 0.437 0.142 1.017 1.167 0.437
14
Performance evaluation of the proposed directional components
I1pre I1F ΔI1F
Mode
FP Mag Ang Mag Ang Mag Ang Φ1 D
Fault
(A) (rad) (A) (rad) (A) (rad) H
Results for superimposed F1 0.450 1.59 4.077 -2.28 4.423 -2.21 2.48 +1
R3 F2 R4 S3
M1 4.25km SBDER1
F2 0.450 1.59 1.209 -0.40 1.451 -0.69 -2.28 -1
PSQ directional element F1 0.282 1.53 0.852 1.25 0.586 1.12 -0.41 -1 E
S1 R1 F1 R2
G ULH
AG
M2 Grid
F2 0.282 1.53 0.967 -1.91 1.239 -1.84 2.91 +1 3.5km
at R3 for different Mode of M3
F1 0.527 1.82 4.833 2.89 4.603 2.99 1.17 +1 ULE ULG J
R5 F3 R 6 S2
F2 0.527 1.82 0.765 -1.08 1.282 -1.18 -3.00 -1
system operations M1
F1 0.450 1.59 10.98 -2.84 11.11 -2.80 1.89 +1 2.2 km SBDER2
M2
F2 0.282 1.53 2.153 -2.63 2.313 -2.53 2.23 +1
F1 0.527 1.82 12.99 2.22 12.50 2.24 0.42 +1
M3
F2 0.527 1.82 2.215 0.74 2.020 0.51 -1.31 -1
15
Results for superimposed directional element
Results for superimposed PSQ directional element at R3 for different Mode of system
operations
/2 /2 /2 /2
2/3 /3 2/3 /3 2/3 /3 2/3 /3
I1F
5/6 /6 /6 5/6 I1pre I1F /6 5/6
I1pre
/6
I1pre 5/6 I1pre 1
2.28
1 0
1 0 1 0
0 0.41 2.91
2.48 I1F
-/6 -/6 -5/6 -/6
-5/6 I1F -5/6 I1F -/6 -5/6 I1F
I1F -2/3
I1F -/3
-2/3 -/3 -2/3 -/3 -2/3 -/3 -/2
-/2 -/2 -/2
Phasor diagrams for ag-type fault. (a) For FP F1 during grid connected mode. (b)
For FP F2 during grid connected mode. (c) For FP F1 during islanded mode. (d) For
FP F2 during islanded mode.
16
Laboratory arrangement
17
Hardware results
Trip signal Creation of ag type
is at 1.19s fault at t=0.1s
Ia , I b , Ic (2.5A / div) Ia , I b , Ic (2.5A / div)
Trip signal
is at 0.98s
1.090s 0.880s
I1F , 2.5A / div (a) 120ms/div I1F , 2.5A / div (b)
120ms/div
Ia , I b , Ic (2.5A / div) Ia , I b , Ic
(2.5A / div)
Trip signal
Trip signal is at
is at 0.716s
0.412s
0.312s 0.616 s
I1F , 2.5A / div 120ms/div I 2F , 2.5A / div 120ms/div
(c) (d)
Real-time three phase current signals for fault F2 during Islanded mode. (a) For conventional
DOCR R3. (b) For conventional DOCR R6. (c) For adaptive DOCR R3. (d) For adaptive DOCR
R6.
18
Superimposed adaptive sequence current based protection
technique
E G H H
R3 F1 R 4 F2S2 A
• The NSQ and PSQ based superimposed Grid
S DC
Transformer
components SBDER
DER
Output
E G MicrogridUnbalancedUL
filter
VSC
• The reverse andSforward
1 R1faults R2 control loads
Grid
• The sequence diagram for the prefault situation Singlecenter
line diagram of a three-phase power
system with DERs and unbalanced loads.
UL UL J
R5 R6 S3
H. Muda and P. Jena, "Superimposed adaptive sequence current based microgrid protection:
A new technique" IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 757-767, 2017
IBDER
UL
19
Thank You
20
Superimposed adaptive sequence current based protection technique
Adaptive Technique
• If the fault current seen be the relay is due the contribution of only IBDERs, ΔIF
is expressed as
I1F I1pre
I F
I1F
I F I1F I 2F I F
21
Protection Coordination
• IDMT characteristics
0.14
t TDS f M TDS
M 0.02
1
22
Prefault NSQ and PSQ Currents
E G H H S1F1 S1F2 Z1L I1L
R3 F1 R4 F2S2 AC E I1a G I1a' H
Grid Z1E Z1EF Z1FG Z1GF Z1FH Z1H
S DC F2
Transformer
F1
SBDER
DER VE VH
Distributed
converter
I1pre / I1F1 / I1F2
DC link
Output
resources
G MicrogridUnbalancedUL
filter
S 2F1
energy
S 2F2
VSC
R2 control loads
3RF Z 2L I 2L
I 2a G '
I 2a
E H
center Z 2E Z 2EF Z 2FG Z 2GF Z 2FH Z 2H
23
Superimposed adaptive sequence current based protection
technique
• Superimposed NSQ directional element I 2F1 I 2F1 I 2pre
The NSQ superimposed current (ΔI2F) F1 I 2F1 I 2pre
I 2pre VE I 2pre VE
F1
I 2E
F2
I 2F2 I 2F2 I 2F2 I 2pre
I 2E
I 2F2
F2 I 2F2 I 2pre
I 2F1
I 2EF
VH I 2HF VH
I 2H
I 2H
I 2F1 I 2HF
I 2EF
(a) (b)
25
Simulation Results for IEEE 34-Bus Microgrid
848
SG1 846 PV1
844 DC
T1 R12 AC
F12 T4
Exciter PV2
F11
R11
842
R10 DC
864 F10 AC
F9
R9
822 858 F3 F4 F5 F6 860 F7 F8 T3 840
R3 R4 834 R5 R6 R7 R8 836
820 R2
F2 SG2 T5 862
818 F1
Grid R1
802 806 808 812 814 850 824 826 832 838
888 890 Exciter
816
Switch
800 T1
852 DC AC
810
AC DC DFIG
26
Results for the Islanded Mode of Operation having
IBDERs
27
Performance Evaluation of the Proposed Directional
Elements (NSQ Directional Relaying Technique)
Superimposed NSQ Directional Relaying Technique
• The selectivity property
• The F3 and F5 fault points
• The NSQ prefault and fault current
angle data
Results for superimposed NSQ
directional element at R5 for ag-type fault
and microgrid operation.
28
Superimposed PSQ Directional Relaying Technique
Results for superimposed PSQ directional element at R5 for abcg-type
fault and microgrid operation.
29
Hardware Results
Laboratory setup for ASSCR technique in the Hardwar-in loop (HIL) test using
real-time digital simulator and dSPACE.
30
Hardware test results
Ia , I b , Ic Ia , I b , Ic DOCR
DOCRR6 trip R8 trip
ag fault at ag fault at
F6 point F6 point
Iphase Iphase
ag fault at ag fault at
F6 point F6 point
IF IF
Three current and observed relay current signals for fault F6 during Islanded mode
(a) For traditional OC primary relay R6, (b) For traditional OC backup relay R8, (c)
For primary ASSCR R6 (d) For backup ASSCR R6
31
Hardware test results
Three current and observed relay currents for fault F6 during Island (IBDERs)
mode: (a) For traditional primary overcurrent relay R6; (b) For traditional backup
overcurrent relay R8; (c) For primary ASSCR R6; (d) For backup ASSCR R6
32
THANK YOU
33