Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/368818514
CITATION READS
1 204
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Khaerul Fadly on 26 February 2023.
EXTENDED ABSTRACT
SUMMARY
Alternative Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) could be developed using locally available protein sources. This
study aimed to formulate RUTF comparable with standard specifications and suitable for Indonesia. Milk, legumes,
or fish were added to provide the formulas with minimum protein content of 10% from total energy. Samples were
analysed for sensory acceptance and nutritional compositions. Milk-based RUTF was the most preferred, and the
Fish-based RUTF was the least-preferred formula. All RUTFs had slightly higher energy contents with lysine as a lim-
iting amino acid. The addition of vitamin and mineral premix is recommended due to the tendency of lower vitamin
and mineral contents below the specifications.
product used as a home-based intervention for managing Maize (%) 0.00 5.00 7.86 7.86 0.00 5.00
severely acute malnourishment in under-five children Soybean (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.50 18.00
with no clinical complication (1). The peanut and milk- Mung bean (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00
based paste combination is the most used RUTF, called Coconut oil (%) 20.00 21.30 0.00 27.30 28.80 0.00
standard RUTF. Several studies developed alternative Palm oil (%) 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 28.00
RUTF using locally available ingredients such as fish, Milk powder (%) 21.50 32.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
soybean, sorghum, maize, and mung bean. However, Catfish flour (%) 0.00 0.00 13.93 13.63 0.00 0.00
until now, in Indonesia, RUTF is still imported (2,3). The Other ingredients
58.50 41.10 51.21 51.21 48.70 44.00
alternative RUTF demonstrated no inferior recovery- (%)
F2: Milk-based non-maize; F4: Milk-based with 5% maize; F7: Fish-based with coconut oil;
related outcomes compared to standard RUTF (2). This F8: Fish-based with palm oil; F10: Legume-based with coconut oil; F11: Legume-based with
study aimed to formulate RUTF that is more locally palm oil; Other ingredients: rice flour, peanut, and sugar
Proceedings of the 2nd IPB International Conference on Nutrition and Food 2022 149
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences Vol.19 Supp 1, Jan 2023 (eISSN 2636-9346)
chromatography methods). Data were processed by sufficient protein and omega-3 fatty acid contents.
One-way ANOVA and the significant results (p<0.05) The lower micronutrient contents in this study were
were subjected to post-hoc Duncan analysis. inconsistent with (2), which suggested that vitamin and
mineral premix should be used in the RUTF formulation
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION to achieve all of the micronutrient specifications.
A total of 6 formulas were selected after initial sensory Lysine was found as a limiting amino acid among all
evaluation from 12 formulas (data were not published). formulas due to the quite high (>20%) use of rice flour
Table II shows that the fish-based formulas tended to have (4). Thus, the amount of protein sources (milk and
the lowest acceptance of each organoleptic attribute due soybean) should be increased, and the amount of peanut
to the highly pronounced fishy flavour, while the Milk- and rice should be reduced so that they do not exceed
based formula (F2) was the most preferred. A similar the maximum protein content but could achieve the
result was found in a study using fish ingredients on the optimum amino acids score. Combining fish with soy
RUTF (3). Thus, the following fish-based formulation could result in better amino acids score and nutritional
should involve the pre-treatment process or additional composition in the fish-based formula.
ingredients that can minimize the fishy flavour of the
product. CONCLUSION
Based on the results above, F2, F8, and F11 were selected The milk-based RUTF was the most accepted formula
for nutritional composition analysis (Table III). All regarding organoleptic characteristics compared to
formulas had higher dietary fibre and total energy. Milk- legume-based and fish-based formulas. Improvement
based RUTF had adequate fat, selenium, and omega-6, of the methods, premix, and ingredients composition
while fish-based RUTF contained higher macronutrients is needed to optimize the amino acid and fatty acid
but complied with the specifications of the selenium composition and better nutrient composition to
and omega-6 fatty acids. Legume-based RUTF provided compromise the RUTF specification.
Table II: Sensory acceptance scores of RUTF paste products
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Sensory acceptance scores
RUTF Overall
Colour Aroma Texture Taste
Acceptance The authors would like to express their gratitude to
F2 5.56±1.05 a 5.09±1.30a 5.06±1.50 a 5.81±1.26 a 5.81±0.10a Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN) and
F4 5.50±1.11a 4.91±1.51a 4.25±1.70 b 5.31±1.61a 5.03±1.51b Indonesian Ministry of Health that supported this study.
F7 3.88±1.24b 4.88±1.29 a 4.53±1.24ab 3.44±1.48c 3.69±1.33d
150 Proceedings of the 2nd IPB International Conference on Nutrition and Food 2022