Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Core Subject
I. Title: TAUTOLOGY
II. Objectives:
After accomplishing this module, you must be able to:
1. identify a tautologous propositions.
2. construct a truth table for Tautology, Contradiction, Contingency and Equivalent
Propositions; and
3. judiciously apply logic in real – life arguments
III. Material/s:
For Reference/s: You may visit our Google Classroom for power point presentations and
sample computations.
V. Concept:
WEEK 1 DAY 2 (Study the concept below, then proceed to the part VI Activity - A)
Can you think of a statement that could never be false? How about a statement that could
never be true? It is harder than you think, unless you know how to identify the truth value of
each arguments.
A truth table shows how the truth or falsity of a compound statement depends on the truth
or falsity of the simple statements from which it’s constructed (Ikenaga, 2019) There are
different types of compound proposition depending on its truth value on a truth table namely
Tautology, Contradiction and Contingency.
TAUTOLOGY CONTRADICTION
A compound proposition which is always A compound proposition which is always
TRUE FALSE.
Example. Example.
p ~p p v (~p) p ~p p ^ (~p)
T F T T F F
F T T F T F
Therefore, p v (~p) is a Tautology Therefore, p ^ (~p) is a Contradiction.
CONTINGENCY
A compound proposition which is sometimes TRUE and sometimes FALSE.
Example.
p ~p p^q
T T T
F F F
F T F
F F F
Therefore, p ^ q is a Contingency.
2. If the demand for sugar continues and the supply decreases, then the price will
inflate.
p: The demand for sugar continues.
q: The supply decreases.
r: the price will inflate.
Symbol: (p ^ q) → r
Truth Table
p q r p^q (p ^ q) → r
T T T T T
T T F T F
T F T F T
T F F F T
F T T F T
F T F F T
F F T F T
F F F F T
Conclusion: Therefore, (p ^ q) → r is a Contingency.
LOGICAL EQUIVALENCE
In logic, two propositions are logically equivalent if they have the same truth value.
1. If roses are red and violets are blue, then roses are not red.
Symbols: Truth Table:
Conclusion:
Conclusion:
3. If the water is clear, then Juan can see the bottom of the pool.
Symbols: Truth Table:
Conclusion:
WEEK 1 DAY 3 (Answer the Formative Assessment, part VII Evaluation and part VIII
Reflection)
B. Formative Assessment
Directions: Construct a truth table for the following propositions and identify if it is
Tautology, Contradiction or Contingency. (RUBRIC: Truth Table = 2 points,
Conclusion = 1 point)
1. p → ~ p 2. (p ^ q) → p
Conclusion: Conclusion:
3. (p ↔ q) ^ (~p ^ q) 4. p → (q ^ r)
Conclusion: Conclusion:
5. (p v q) → (p ^ q)
Conclusion:
C. Formative Assessment
Directions: Construct a truth table for each proposition below, then determine which
two are logically equivalent. (RUBRIC: Truth Table = 2 points, Conclusion = 1 point)
1. ~q → p 2. ~ (p → q)
3. p v q Conclusion:
A. Directions: Construct a truth table for each proposition below, then determine which
two are logically equivalent. (RUBRIC: Truth Table = 2 points, Conclusion = 1 point)
1 – 2. p → (q ^ ~q)
3 – 4. ~p → ~q 5 – 6. ~p v ~q
7 - 8. p → q 9. ~p
10. Conclusion:
B. Directions: Construct a truth table for the following propositions and identify if it is
Tautology, Contradiction or Contingency. (RUBRIC: Truth Table = 2 points,
Conclusion = 1 point)
11 – 12. ~ p → p
13. Conclusion:
14 – 15. (p ^ q) ↔ (q ^ p)
16. Conclusion:
17 – 18. (p ↔ q) ^ (~p ^ q)
19. Conclusion:
22. Conclusion:
23 – 24. ~ (p ^ q) ^ (~r)
25. Conclusion:
2.
Truth Table